Sukhoi Director General Quits Job As Design Bureau Chief – Company

SUKHOI DIRECTOR GENERAL QUITS JOB AS DESIGN BUREAU CHIEF – COMPANY

RIA Novosti
12:22 | 01/ 08/ 2007

MOSCOW, August 1 (RIA Novosti) – Mikhail Pogosyan, director general of
the Sukhoi Aircraft Holding Company, has resigned his post as the head
of the Sukhoi Design Bureau, the company said in a statement Wednesday.

The Sukhoi Design Bureau’s board of directors accepted Pogosyan’s
resignation at a July 30 meeting, citing the official’s desire to
focus on managing the Sukhoi Aircraft Holding Company.

Pogosyan currently holds several posts, including board member of the
United Aircraft Corporation (UAC), a majority state-owned corporation
consolidating aircraft-building companies and state assets engaged
in the manufacture, design, and sale of military, non-military,
transport, and unmanned aircraft.

The board also appointed Igor Ozar as managing director of the Sukhoi
Design Bureau starting July 31.

The bureau is part of the Sukhoi Aircraft Holding Company, which is
100% state-owned.

Armenians Angry At ADL (Anti-Defamation League )

ARMENIANS ANGRY AT ADL

Jewish Telegraphic Agency, NY
.html
Aug 1 2007

A nationwide program sponsored by the Anti-Defamation League is
prompting an angry response from Armenians upset by the organization’s
stance on the Armenian genocide.

Armenian residents of the Boston suburb of Watertown want the local
"No Place for Hate" program to sever its ties with the ADL, the Boston
Globe reported. "No Place for Hate" certifies individual communities
that undertake anti-bias programming.

At issue is the ADL’s refusal to endorse a proposed congressional
bill that would recognize the Turkish murder of an estimated 1.5
million Armenians during World War I. Turkey refuses to acknowledge
the genocide, and has enlisted the help of several prominent political
figures to help defeat the bill.

The ADL contends that it doesn’t take positions on historical issues.

Other Jewish groups, including B’nai B’rith, the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee and the American Jewish Committee have taken
no position on the resolution.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/103379

BBG Renews Contract With Private Station In Armenia: RFE/RL Armenian

BBG RENEWS CONTRACT WITH PRIVATE STATION IN ARMENIA: RFE/RL ARMENIAN SERVICE STILL OFF PUBLIC RADIO

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Aug 1 2007

(Washington, DC–August 1, 2007) The Broadcasting Board of Governors
(BBG) has renewed a contract to carry the programs of Radio Liberty’s
Armenian language service on a private radio network based in the
Armenian capital, Yerevan.

The contract with AR Radio Intercontinental runs from August 15,
2007 until September 14, 2008. The network has 23 transmitters,
which cover Yerevan and a number of outlying districts.

"We are pleased that many Armenian listeners will be able to
continue to hear our programming on AR Radio Intercontinental," said
Jeffrey Gedmin, President and Chief Operating Officer of Radio Free
Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL, Inc.).

However, Gedmin noted that efforts to renew a contract with Armenian
Public Radio, which has transmitters covering the entire country,
have so far proven unsuccessful.

"We remain deeply committed to nationwide coverage of Armenia.

Hundreds of thousands of listeners rely on Radio Liberty’s Armenian
Service and depend on us for accurate, comprehensive news," said
Gedmin, noting that the latest national surveys indicate 15 percent
of Armenians tune in each week.

Armenian Public Radio announced in mid-July that it would stop carrying
Radio Liberty broadcasts on August 9, 2007 on the 80 transmitters in
the network.

"We have worked diligently to settle any legal and contractual issues,
and believe there is no reason the broadcasts shouldn’t continue,"
said Gedmin.

RFE/RL Armenian programs have been aired on Armenian Public Radio —
Armenia’s top radio network — since 1998. Three days of contract
discussions in Yerevan in mid-July ended without resolution.

James K. Glassman, Chairman of the Broadcasting Board of Governors,
said at the time, "We value our relationship with Armenian Public
Radio, and certainly want it to continue."

RFE/RL’s Armenian Service has been on the air since 1953 and produces
more than three and one half hours of Armenian-language programming
daily in Prague and its Yerevan Bureau. Armenian Service programming
is available via satellite, local affiliates and the Internet,
at the service’s website and at ;
English-language news about events in Armenia can be found on the
RFE/RL website, at

www.azatutyun.am
www.rferl.org
www.rferl.org.

Destination: Iran

DESTINATION: IRAN
By Helena Garan

Press & Sun-Bulletin, NY
Post Comment
July 31 2007

Mission of peace met with favorable response from citizens

As part of an effort to strengthen peaceful relations between
the United States and Iran (formerly Persia), I joined a group of
civilian diplomats traveling to the Middle East in May 2007. The
group was sponsored by the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR, see
) which is an almost 100-year-old non-denominational
organization dedicated to working towards peace through citizen
diplomacy. It was our group’s sincere hope that by immersing ourselves
in the Iranian culture and by getting to know its people firsthand,
we could help foster better relations between our countries at a
time when tensions are so high. We need to do everything possible to
prevent the start of a war with Iran.

Our delegation consisted of 16 people who came from a variety of
backgrounds — 14 of us from the United States. The group included
professors, ministers, peace activists, students and two documentary
filmmakers from the Netherlands who were making a movie about how we
as Americans experienced Iran.

The trip demanded significant preparation including a lengthy list
of required reading, a condensed course on the Iranian culture and
customs and weekly conference calls with the group. We were divided
into three groups: religious, political and cultural.

After much energy and effort had been put into our preparations,
we were disheartened to receive word from the Iranian government
10 days prior to our intended departure that approval of our visas
was still pending. We were notified that our documents would not be
granted unless we agreed to travel exclusively as tourists and not
move forward with the meetings we had scheduled with Islamic clergy,
government officials, university students and professors, health
organizations, and leaders of religious minorities such as Christians,
Jews, Zoroastrians and Armenians. Disappointed, we all agreed and
the visas were finally granted — only six hours prior to departure.

Some friends and family of the delegates were quite concerned because
they felt that the stage is being set for an attack on Iran by the
United States. Also, several Iranian-Americans were detained in Tehran
and accused of spying for the United States.

The United States issues about 100 visas annually to Iranians. And
Iran issues 300 to 500 visas a year to Americans. Tourism has
suffered enormously in Iran, a country with a rich, long history and
breathtaking beauty. We did, however, encounter a French and a Dutch
tour group and another peace group from the States.

My daughter and travel companion, Farrah, and I met our fellow
travelers at JFK Airport several hours before boarding the
plane that would take us to this country shrouded in mystery and
misunderstanding. After a lengthy meeting and further instruction
by the two FOR officials who were part of our delegation, we were on
our way via Amsterdam to Tehran.

Upon arrival at the airport in Iran, a government official collected
our passports and disappeared through a door. Anxiously, we waited.

And waited. After what seemed like an eternity, with many of us hoping
we wouldn’t be sent home, the gentleman returned, flashed us a warm
smile and said "Welcome to Iran. I hope you will love my country. I
wish you a wonderful trip." It certainly would not be the last time
our group encountered such an amicable reception.

The bus we would be using for the next two weeks was waiting for us,
along with the driver and his assistant who would serve us tea and
snacks during our lengthy trips. We were welcomed with roses for all
participants by our Iranian tour leader and our travel agent. All
the hotels we stayed in were impressive and exceeded all expectations.

Our first full day in Iran was spent sightseeing in Tehran, a clean
and beautiful city with modern high-rises, lots of construction,
great highways. It is settled in the foothills of the Alborz Mountains
with its snow-topped peaks. The traffic is rather chaotic, to say
the least. Then we went shopping for culturally appropriate clothing
for the women in our group. Since the revolution in 1979, Iran has
become an Islamic republic. All women — including tourists — are
required to show only their face and hands and to wear loose-fitting
clothing that hides the curves of their body. So we bought veils or
head scarves and chadors or coats and wore them the entire duration
of our visit, even in 95-degree temperatures. One of the delegates
got creative and wore her son’s graduation gown, which turned out to
be a great substitute for the chador.

Some other Iranian cultural rules we learned while there: Do not shake
hands or have any physical contact with the opposite sex in public;
always remove your shoes when visiting a mosque; always refuse at
least twice before graciously accepting a gift.

In spite of the rules by which they are required to live, we
consistently found the Iranian people to be hospitable, outgoing,
sophisticated, generous and very willing to talk to us, which enabled
bonds of friendship to form quickly. Politeness and hospitality rank
high in their culture.

The people we met openly expressed dissent toward their government and
its restrictive Islamic regulations. Only a few women we encountered
claimed to appreciate the dress code as a traditional symbol of their
Islamic faith, and they enjoyed the freedom of going out in public
without being looked at inappropriately by strange men.

Iran, with a population of about 71 million people, has one of the
oldest civilizations in the world. Now it is a very young country:
about 70 percent is under the age of 30. Iranians are not Arabs
but Indo-Europeans. The size of Iran equals about 18 percent of the
United States, and their language is Farsi. Sixty-five percent of the
university students are female and seem to dress very fashionably
under their Islamic cover-up. They drive cars and work outside the
home just like we do in the States.

We were strongly encouraged by our Iranian tour guide to be extremely
cognizant of what we said, how we behaved and how we dressed, so that
we would not inadvertently disrespect the Iranian traditions or in
some way create an incident that the government could use against
the United States.

We had absolutely no problems while in Iran. Our movements were not
restricted. We were never frightened, intimidated or concerned for
our safety. We stayed in luxury hotels, ate delicious Persian food
and enjoyed what many of our group believed to be the best ice cream
in the world — saffron and rosewater. We consistently experienced
kindness from strangers, who gave freely of their time, food, drink
and stories. Everywhere we went, people approached us and wanted to
engage in conversation. When asked where we were from, contrary to
what many Americans may have expected, the Iranian people delighted
in our answer. "We love America! Welcome! Welcome to our country!" At
the end of my conversations, I always asked if they would like to
accept a letter from a caring American friend.

I brought 200 letters with me from peace-loving people in America.

The letters were filled with friendship, compassion, understanding
and love. Because of them, I had so many opportunities to interact
in a warm and meaningful way with the people of this ancient country.

The women showed their appreciation for the letters with hugs and
kisses. Though a letter is such a small gesture, my hope was that
if they were to share it with their extended family and neighbors,
it might be a catalyst for a positive change in perception and
understanding. Mother Teresa once said, "What we are trying to do may
be just a drop in the ocean, but the ocean would be less because of
that missing drop."

While our trip was informative and a success based on the
positive interactions we had, much more needs to be done to promote
understanding between our two countries. Our goal should be to prevent
the tragedy of war by fostering peace and understanding between the
people of Iran and the United States. Direct diplomatic negotiation
is the way to resolve the issues with Iran. Responsible, farsighted
problem-solving is needed to help stabilize the Middle East. I don’t
want to see a nuclear-armed Iran. There is still time to dissuade
Iran from going after the higher levels of uranium enrichment that
are needed to make nuclear weapons. However, I strongly believe
that bombing Iran will create another Iraq. Dialogue and diplomacy
with Iran, including people-to-people diplomacy, is the best way to
protect America.

We also visited the Caspian Sea (think: caviar), bazaars, mosques
and shrines of Iran’s famous poets, mountains, deserts, palaces
and museums. We flew to Shiraz on an old Russian plane and were in
awe of Persepolis, which was discovered in the 1930s by an American
professor of the University of Chicago. We also saw Esfahan, said to
be the most beautiful city in the world, the Holy City of Qom, where
the majority of the people seem to be clergy in tulbans and cloaks,
and many more places.

Any group interested in seeing a photographic presentation about the
places we visited in Iran can contact me at [email protected]. To
find out more about the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR) and past
and future delegations all over the world, please visit their web
site at

I’d like to finish with a poem by one of Iran’s famous poets, Sa’di,
that is very special to me and so appropriate:

The Sons of Adam are the members of a whole.
Each is created from a greater, single soul.
Whenever Fate to one of them brings pain
No other can without distress remain.
You, who for others’ torment do not care
Cannot the name of ‘human’ rightly bear.
Garan is a Johnson City resident.

www.forusa.org
www.forusa.org.

Three Conflicts Of The South Caucasus As A Theme Of The Oskanian- Be

THREE CONFLICTS OF THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AS A THEME OF THE OSKANIAN-BEZHUASHVILI MEETING
By Aghavni Harutyunian

AZG Armenian Daily #142
28/07/2007

The meeting of RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian with his Georgian
counterpart

Gela Bezhuashvili took place in Tbilisi. At the meeting, the two
Foreign Ministers discussed issues concerning the cooperation
between both countries in the political, economical and cultural
spheres. Vardan Oskanian and Gela Bezhuashvili also discussed regional
issues, relations with the neighboring countries and partnership in
international structures, according to RA MFA Press Office.

Vardan Oskanian drew his Georgian counterpart’s attention to arrests
of Armenian citizens by Georgian law enforcement bodies near the
Georgian-Armenian border. The two FMs also discussed issues concerning
delimitation of the Armenian-Georgian border. Touching upon settlements
of regional conflicts Vartan Oskanian underlined adherence of the
Nagorno Karabakh people to democracy and familiarized Gela Bezhuashvili
with the latest developments in the peace process. In his part, Gela
Bezhuashvili presented his guest Georgia’s approach to the settlement
of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict and steps to give the South Ossetian
problem an international character, PanArmenian.Net informs.

Armenian Justice Minister, U.S. Judge Discuss Armenian Judge Conduct

ARMENIAN JUSTICE MINISTER, U.S. JUDGE DISCUSS ARMENIAN JUDGE CONDUCT CODE

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
July 25 2007

YEREVAN, July 25. /ARKA/. Armenian Justice Minister Gevorg Poghosyan
met John Walker, U.S. District Court Judge engaged in judge ethics
and conduct, on Tuesday in Yerevan.

Armenian Justice Ministry’s press office reports that they discussed
Armenian Judge Conduct Code.

The minister described the procedure of punishment applied to those
judges violating the code.

The American specialist approved the procedure.

Comments on the Armenian Judge Conduct Code are published in Armenia
on the instruction of the Ethics Commission of Armenian Court Chairmen
Council and Armenian Judges Union. The comments edited by Armenian
Cassation Court Chairman Hovhannes Manoukyan are published with USAID
Armenian Office and ABA/ROLI support.

Richardson Pledges Cosponsorship Support Of Armenian Genocide Resolu

RICHARDSON PLEDGES COSPONSORSHIP SUPPORT OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION

armradio.am
24.07.2007 11:17

The Armenian National Committee – Western Region has learned that
California State Assembly member Laura Richardson (D-55), Democratic
Party Candidate for the 37th Congressional District of California,
has agreed to cosponsor the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H. Res. 106)
if elected to Congress. Richardson is currently vying to represent
the 37th District in a Special Election.

"If elected to Congress, I will be proud to add my name to the long and
distinguished list of H. Res. 106 cosponsors," said Richardson. "We
need to formally recognize this unfortunate chapter of history, so
as to prevent any future genocides and promote regional stability,"
she added.

Congresswoman Juanita Millender-McDonald, a strong supporter of issues
of concern to Armenian Americans and a cosponsor of H. Res. 106,
represented the 37th Congressional District of California until her
passing on April 22, 2007. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger,
acting under California law, then announced a special election date
to fill the vacant seat.

Richardson succeeded in the June 26, 2007 primary, besting California
State Senator Jenny Oropeza. Because no candidate received 50% of the
vote, the Special Election will continue to a run-off on August 21,
2007. The other candidates facing Richardson are John M. Kanaley (R),
Herb Peters (L), and Daniel Brezenoff (G).

Everyone Will Crack Down On CFE

EVERYONE WILL CRACK DOWN ON CFE;
by Artem Yerkanyan

Agency WPS
Source: Novoe Vremya (Yerevan), July 19, 2007, p. EV
DEFENSE and SECURITY (Russia)
July 23, 2007 Monday

Azerbaijan stated its claims against the CFE after Russia

A LOOK FROM YEREVAN: THE CFE CONTRADICTS THE INTERESTS OF AZERBAIJAN;
Will the withdrawal of Moscow from the CFE change the geopolitical
situation in the South Caucasus?

Will the withdrawal of Moscow from the CFE change the geopolitical
situation in the South Caucasus? Most likely, we will notice
repercussions of the harsh step taken by the Kremlin too. The matter
is about our main ally and the country that has a military presence in
four of the six recognized and recognized states of the South Caucasus.

The stance of Yerevan is unambiguous and very simple. Armenia believes
in the efficiency of the CFE and sees in it efficient mechanisms
for restraining the armament race. Expressing its regret about the
disputes that have appeared between Russia and Western countries,
Yerevan expects that by the way of a dialogue it will be possible to
smooth down the contradictions and the CFE will remain a guarantee
of stability on the continent. The reaction of Azerbaijan was not
as clear. As usual, Baku used this pretext for verbal attacks at
Armenia again.

Azerbaijan tries to attract attention to its claims that Baku
accuses it of not only all mortal sins but also of breaching the
CFE requirements.

Let us try to find out which breaches are meant. It is known that
the CFE stipulates quotas for conventional arms for all participating
countries. Having signed the CFE 15 years ago, Armenia and Azerbaijan
undertook the observance of these quotas and the provision of
transparency of the process of refilling arsenals. So, Azerbaijan
breaches the limits set for it according to all parameters. Let
us start with tanks. Armenia and Azerbaijan are allowed to have
no more than 220 tanks. Meanwhile, according to Russian military
sources, at the end of 2006 there were 296 tanks and 706 combat
armored vehicles in Azerbaijan (the information was published in
Russian Voenno-Promyshlenny Kuryer). Armenia stringently observes
the undertaken obligations and feels content with 192 tanks and 338
armored personnel carriers. The military aviation fleet of Azerbaijan
is oversaturated too and does not fit CFE requirements. According
to the same source, currently Azerbaijan has 61 combat airplanes and
helicopters and 46 airplanes and helicopters of auxiliary aviation.

In the air force of Armenia, everything is within the limits of the
quotas: seven combat airplanes, 12 combat helicopters and 26 airplanes
and helicopters of auxiliary aviation, overall 45 aircraft.

This is quite sufficient for the provision of its defense capability
because the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic has a well armed army of its
own too. According to independent Russian experts, the air force of
Nagorno-Karabakh has 11 combat aircraft. According to various sources,
the army of Nagorno-Karabakh has from 177 to 316 tanks and about 300
combat infantry vehicles. Incidentally, armament of the army of the
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic is not within the quotas of Armenia because
Nagorno-Karabakh is not a part of our country.

Unfortunately, being an unrecognized state, the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic cannot join the CFE. At any rate, being isolated by the
international community, Stepanakert manifested good will and undertook
unilateral obligations to follow CFE limitations.

Nagorno-Karabakh has not breached requirements of the CFE, which
cannot be said about Azerbaijan.

Incidentally, Baku diplomats recognize the fact that Azerbaijan
breaches the CFE terms indirectly. Commenting on claims of
international experts who confirm significant exceeding of the
established limits, the head of the press service of the Foreign
Ministry of Azerbaijan tells fairy tales that the Defense Ministry
simply does not manage to scrap the old one on time. This is reportedly
the reason why experts notice non-compliance of the arsenals with
the stipulated quotas.

It is clear that the CFE contradicts the interests of Azerbaijan
because monitoring done by international organizations in the framework
of the CFE allows revealing of the militarist course pursued by
Baku. Azerbaijan, continuing the armament race, tries to avoid
international control. That is why Aliev’s Administration tries
to discredit the CFE using a convenient pretext. Along with this,
whereas Moscow has had sufficiently serious reasons to refuse to
participate in the CFE, Baku cannot invent any serious arguments yet.

That is why it has to confine its efforts to accusing of the CFE of
"inability to hinder the threat of Armenian aggression."

Saakian officially proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh president-elect

Saakian officially proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh president-elect

Interfax Russia
July 21 2007

STEPANAKERT. July 21 (Interfax) – The Central Election Commission (CEC)
of the self-proclaimed republic of Nagorno-Karabakh has officially
announced that Bako Saakian was elected president in the July 19
elections.

Saakian, a former chief of the Nagorno-Karabakh National Security
Service, garnered 81.1% of the vote, and Deputy Foreign Minister
Masis Mailian came in second with 12.5%, the CEC said. A total of
five people were running in the elections.

According To Artsvik Minasian, It Is Not Compulsory At All That Pres

ACCORDING TO ARTSVIK MINASIAN, IT IS NOT COMPULSORY AT ALL THAT
PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE NOMINATED BY ARFD IS MEMBER OF ARF DASHNAKTSUTIUN

YEREVAN, JULY 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The ARF Dashnaktsutiun cannot be
considered as a party backing the authorities as it does not always
support the bills presented by the authorities. This statement was
made by Artsvik Minasian, a member of the ARF Dashnaktsutiun faction
of the National Assembly, during the debate held on July 20. According
to him, Dashnaktsutiun is the opposition in terms of the fact that
it has its own position concerning every question. The current
political attitude of the ARF Dashnaktsutiun faction, according to
Armen Minasian, is characterized as "left pro-central" in politology.

Touching upon the 2008 presidential elections, the MP declared:
"It is not obligatory at all that the ARFD candidate is a member of
the ARF Dashnaktsutiun faction." Armen Minasian added that the ARF
Dashnaktsutiun is simply obliged to offer an alternative to people. "We
cannot wholly return to the institute for the defence of one person,"
the MP of the Dashnaktsutiun faction mentioned.

He also added that the ARF Dashnaktsutiun supported the candidature
of Bako Sahakian in the presidential elections of the Republic of
Armenia, taking into consideration the situation created in Artsakh.