The Conflict Has No Military Settlement

THE CONFLICT HAS NO MILITARY SETTLEMENT

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
Published on July 23, 2008
Armenia

The statement made by OSCE Minsk group co-Chairmen runs Karabakh
conflict has no military settlement. The statement was included in
OSCE official site.

The statement also runs OSCE Minsk group co-Chairmen welcome the
constructive stance of Presidents Ilham Aliev and Serge Sargsyan
towards the negotiation process. "At this important stage the
co-Chairmen appeal to all the sides to avoid bellicose announcements
both during the negotiations and their public speeches, because we
all make efforts to achieve peaceful settlement of the conflict,"
was written in the document.

Armenia: Economic Growth Rate Exceeds 10% In H1

ARMENIA: ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE EXCEEDS 10% IN H1

Esmerk Armenia News
July 23 2008

ABSTRACT According to the National Statistical Service of the Republic
of Armenia, in the first half of 2008, economic growth rate accounted
for 10.3%. GDP reached Dr 1,320bn (US$ 4.28bn EUR 2.73bn). Consumer
prices rose by 9% year-on-year. Foreign trade turnover in Armenia
increased by 28.9% to US$ 2.43mn. In the first half of 2007, economic
growth rate accounted for 11.2%.

BAKU: Nikolai Bordyuzha: "Armenia Plans To Solve Big Problems During

NIKOLAI BORDYUZHA: "ARMENIA PLANS TO SOLVE BIG PROBLEMS DURING ITS CHAIRMANSHIP IN THE COLLECTIVE SECURITY TREATY ORGANIZATION"

Azeri Press Agency
July 21 2008
Azerbaijan

Secretary General of the Collective Security Treaty Organization
Nikolai Bordyuzha has started his visit to Armenia on Monday.

He will discuss the work to be done during the Armenia’s chairmanship
in the organization, APA reports. Bordyuzha said Armenia would take
over the chairmanship as the results of CSTO summits scheduled for
August-September. "We need to discuss the big problems to be solved
during Armenia’s chairmanship in the Collective Security Treaty
Organization". Bordyuzha will meet with Armenia’s president, foreign
minister, emergency and police ministers, secretary of the National
Security Council and parliament speaker.

CSTO unites Armenia, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.

Azeri Media Reports On ‘Penetration Of Armenian Subversives Into Aze

AZERI MEDIA REPORTS ON ‘PENETRATION OF ARMENIAN SUBVERSIVES INTO AZERBAIJAN’ FALSE

PanARMENIAN.Net
19.07.2008 17:59 GMT+04:00

Azeri media reports on penetration of Armenian subversives into
Azerbaijan do not correspond to the truth, RA Defense Minister’s
Spokesman, col. Seyran Shahsuvaryan told PanARMENIAN.Net. "Such
reports are nothing but a regular propagandistic trick," he said.

Earlier, Azeri media with a reference to the Azerbaijani Defense
Ministry reported that "Armenian subversives tried to cross the
Armenian-Azeri border. One of them was killed in a skirmish. His body
and weapon were left on the Azerbaijani territory."

Thomas Hammaberg: "Resolution Incomplete"

THOMAS HAMMABERG: "RESOLUTION INCOMPLETE"

Panorama.am
15:16 16/07/2008

"If I have to present the report to the Monitoring Committee tomorrow,
then I would say that June requests remained incomplete," said the
Commissioner for Human Rights of Council of Europe Thomas Hammaberg,
in a press conference.

He said that much should be done to guarantee the expectations of
PACE and reminded that On September 11 he is going to make a report
in the PACE session. He said that hopefully till that visible changes
will be made.

The Commissioner said that although PACE gave time to Armenian
authorities to fulfill the recommendations of the resolution till
January, it does not mean that the authorities should wait for the
very last day. He said that it is quite possible that final decision
will be made even in autumn session.

Tourism Dream For Southern Enclave Of Nagorno Karabakh

TOURISM DREAM FOR SOUTHERN ENCLAVE

RussiaToday
July 14 2008
Russia

Nagorno-Karabakh, an unrecognised republic that proclaimed independence
in 1991, is surrounded by Azerbaijan. Now it survives on subsistence
agriculture and inward investment from Armenians across the world.

Cows, goats and sheep, wheat and potatoes, the odd vineyard sprinkled
through the countryside and the absence of virtually any industry –
that’s the life of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Leonard Grigoryan used to be a bus driver, but now he’s a shepherd. He
lives kilometres away from the nearest village and once a week he
heads there to see his friends and buy some bread.

"I trade in my beef, and I have milk from my cows. Everything I do,
I do it for my family and grandchildren. But of course it’s hard work,"
Leonard says.

But Armenians around the globe are supporting Nagorno-Karabakh,
and this is the main source of income for the republic.

A Russian businessman whose family is Armenian has given money to
build a school in Nagorno-Karabakh and he has a number of other
projects in the area, including a restaurant and swimming pool.

He says his aim is to ignite tourism.

"You know, there are huge prospects for tourism development here. You
can see the beauty of this place, and the ecology is great. No doubt
it’ll be a paradise in the near future," says Sergey, a businessman.

People who have visited Nagorno-Karabakh as tourists agree.

Shane Leahy is a tourist from Dubai, and it’s his second trip to
Karabakh. He says Nagorno-Karabakh has a lot of advantages as a
tourist spot.

"It’s safe, it’s not expensive, and it’s a relatively short trip to
fly here from Dubai and back. And the people here are very friendly
compared to other places of the world," he says.

But it could take a long time before tourists invade in larger numbers,
as Nagorno-Karabakh has no airports or railways.

‘Frozen conflict’

Nagorno-Karabakh is the source of a dispute between two former Soviet
republics, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and is now one of the world’s
‘frozen conflicts’.

The region was devastated by a war fought over its independence at
the beginning of the 1990s. It lasted three years taking the lives of
over 30,000 people. The conflict ended in a ceasefire with Armenian
army units defending the republic’s unofficial borders.

Both Speculations And Confusions Over The President’s Statements

BOTH SPECULATIONS AND CONFUSIONS OVER THE PRESIDENT’S STATEMENTS
Lilit Poghosyan

Hayots Ashkhar Daily
Published on July 11, 2008
Armenia

The representatives of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation –
Dashnaktsutyun (ARFD) have had the occasion to touch upon Serge
Sargsyan’s statement on the regulation of the Armenian-Turkish
relations, a statement which the press supporting the Armenian
Pan-National Movement immediately distorted, representing it as an
"abrupt turning point" in the policy of the international recognition
of the Armenia Genocide.

But considering that the pro-Ter-Petrosyan propaganda machine
assiduously continues to speculate the obviously false thesis (that
has become the top hit of the season) as though the President has
thus "questioned the fact of the Armenian Genocide", we again asked
Dashnaktsutyun, a party supporting the claims of ‘Hay Dat’ (Armenian
Cause) to express its opinion.

KIRO MANOYAN, Person in Charge for the ARFD Bureau’s Central Office of
‘Hay Dat’ and Political Affairs, gives answers to our questions.

"In the statement released after the plenary session, Dashnaktsutyun
ruled out the possibility that the attitude of any senior Armenian
official might differ from the approach adopted in 1998. Is it possible
to state that the rumors on the "divergence of approaches" between
the second and the incumbent Presidents of Armenia are exaggerated?"

"We have said and continue holding the viewpoint the statement Serge
Sargsyan made in Moscow with regard to setting up a committee of
Armenian and Turkish historians has given rise to some confusions,
and it would be more preferable if he hadn’t made any statement of
the kind.

At the same time, both the President’s statement and the clarifications
made thereafter show once again that Serge Sargsyan does not consider
the fact of the Armenian Genocide a disputable issue, and the
conversation may go around studying the details and not recognizing
the fact of the Genocide.

However, before doing that, it is necessary for Turkey to open the
border and establish diplomatic relations with Armenia.

Is there any difference between the approaches of the two
Presidents? In some respect, there is. As you know, in response to
Prime Minister Erdoghan’s letter proposing to set up a bilateral
committee of historians with the purpose of discussing the issue
of the Genocide, President Kocharyan clearly stated that it was
not right and fair to lay the whole burden of the problems existing
between the two countries upon the shoulders of historians, and it
was more advisable to set up an inter-parliamentary committee which
will discuss all the matters of concern.

However, it’s one thing when you say that you are ready to discuss
all the problems and quite a different thing when you emphasize that
it is possible to discuss any question including the issue of setting
up a committee studying the historical facts even though those facts
are confirmed and not subject to any dispute. This may give rise to
various interpretations, and Armenia is not the only place where the
issue is being speculated.

In foreign countries there are also people who, during official
discussions and meetings, raise the following question: if the
President of Armenia is inclined to approve the proposal of setting
up a committee of Armenian and Turkish historians, is there any need
to adopt a resolution recognizing the Armenian Genocide."

"Anyway, is it possible to conclude from here that Armenia has
officially ‘approved the proposal of setting up a committee questioning
the fact of the Armenian Genocide’?"

"Should Turkey make response, it will clearly express the country’s
attitude towards the whole proposal. That is, it will have to answer
the question whether it is ready to open the border and establish
diplomatic relations with Armenia and only thereafter raise the
question of the committee. Nevertheless, the truth is that the
statement of the President gives rise to both speculations and
confusions. Our concern is this and not the fact that the President
considers the historical fact of the Genocide disputable or promotes
the implementation of Turkey’s proposal.

By making this statement, inviting the Turkish President to Yerevan
and publishing an article on the Armenia-Turkey dialogue, President
Sargsyan is probably trying to create some atmosphere. It rests with
us to wait and see how far he can go for satisfying the preconditions
advanced by Turkey and not only."

"What do you mean?"

"Of course, S. Sargsyan hasn’t made any statement with regard to
yielding to the preconditions of Turkey, but just a day before
the President’s official visit to Moscow some preconditions were
advanced by the American officials. The conversation was about the
statements on Armenia’s recognizing the Turkish borders and waiving
its territorial claims.

Those statements are a little bit unclear, at least as far as the
United States is concerned because there’s no US-Turkey agreement in
which the United States recognizes the present-day Armenian-Turkish
borders. In 1927, they wanted to sign such a treaty, or rather, they
did sign it, however, the Senate refused to ratify the document. In
case of establishing diplomatic relations without preconditions,
Armenia and Turkey will be neither the first nor the last countries
to face the problem of borders despite having diplomatic relations."

Group’s stance on Armenian Genocide questioned

The Marshfield Mariner
Marshfield, Mass.

Group’s stance on Armenian Genocide questioned
By Lydia Mulvany
Tue Jul 08, 2008
Marshfield

With help from the Anti-Defamation League, the Marshfield community
recently met on the Town Green to observe a vigil against hate crimes,
alarmed and disgusted by the alleged beating and stabbing of an
African-American teenager by a group of white people.

But Sharistan Melkonian, chairwoman of the Armenian National Committee
of Massachusetts, has called Marshfield’s resurrection of its No Place
for Hate committee "irresponsible." NPFH is a registered trademark of
the ADL, which the ANC calls a questionable ally.

The ANC has been working with towns to find alternatives to No Place
For Hate since last July because of the ADL’s stance on the Armenian
Genocide. During World War I, the Turkish government killed more than
1 million through massacres and forced marches, but today denies that
a genocide took place.

"(The ADL) has gone to great length to actively oppose Congressional
affirmation of the Armenian Genocide, and they have refused to
unambiguously acknowledge it," Melkonian said. "When you couple the
two together, it leaves concern as to whether or not they are an
appropriate partner for this kind of work. They’re engaging in what
they have identified as the ultimate form of hate speech: genocide
denial.’

As part of statement he made Aug. 21, 2007, ADL National Director
Abraham H. Foxman said, `We have never negated but have always
described the painful events of 1915 to 1918 perpetrated by the
Ottoman Empire against the Armenians as massacres and atrocities. –
If the word genocide had existed then, they would have called it
genocide. – Having said that, we continue to firmly believe that a
Congressional resolution on such matters is a counterproductive
diversion and will not foster reconciliation between Turks and
Armenians and may put at risk the Turkish Jewish community and the
important multilateral relationship between Turkey, Israel and the
United States.’

Marshfield Town Administrator Rocco Longo said that although he
doesn’t take what the Armenians say lightly, the town has to look at
local needs and take a closer look at the issue – a complex,
international issue whose effects in Marshfield don’t translate
easily.

"Clearly there was a genocide against the Armenians, but it’s such a
heavy-duty issue,’ he said. `We’re still going to fight hate in
Marshfield, and the ADL has been very supportive of our fight against
hate. We’ve got a lot more to learn, but it doesn’t mean locally that
we’re going to give up."

Jen Smith, the associate regional director for the Anti-Defamation
League, said the ADL does use the word genocide.

`It was certainly never denied, the historic suffering of the Armenian
people, and we now do use the term genocide to describe that tragic
period of history,’ she said.

Smith, who was named Person of the Week at the selectmen’s June 30
meeting, said that NPFH’s track record of providing support,
strategies and resources to unite is solid, and that the organization
has been serving communities in Massachusetts for nearly 10 years.

`There’s really no other program out there that’s quite like it, and
I’m proud to be a part of it, because you see what’s possible when you
all come together. We’re proud of what the communities have been able
to do,’ Smith said.

Smith said that the network of support, which Marshfield has now
joined, is one of the most valuable aspects of the program.

`I see scores of local communities who are committed to this work, and
have found that this program is the best way for them to be able to
get a network of support to do this work,’ Smith said. `In the South
Shore alone, which Marshfield is a welcomed member of, there are 13
communities who implement this program and support one another, so you
don’t have to reinvent the wheel every time.’

Marshfield’s NPFH program was reinvigorated with help from
Duxbury. Hingham, Randolph and Plymouth, Smith said.

However, Melkonian argued that it’s harder for No Place For Hate to do
human rights work because it is tainted by the national ADL’s actions.

"In Lexington, a woman who was a victim of a hate crime stood up at a
board of selectmen meeting, during a discussion of whether to maintain
No Place for Hate," Melkonian said. "The woman said the No Place for
Hate committee was very helpful and helped her understand, personally
respond to and come away from that crime in a positive way. She said
it would have been difficult to get through it without them. But had
she been an Armenian-American, she would not have been able to go to
them. It was very powerful for me to hear that from someone who
benefited from the good that No Place for Hate can do. But there are
genocide survivors or descendants of survivors that would go to them,
and now cannot." Lexington no longer has a No Place For Hate
committee, along with 12 other towns in the state that have
withdrawn. Some of those towns have merely dropped the NPFH name, and
continue the work in their own human rights committees or diversity
task forces.

Scituate selectmen voted last year to send a letter of disappointment
to the ADL regarding its statements about the Armenian Genocide, but
never got around to it. Scituate Selectman John Danehey, whose wife is
Armenian, wanted to terminate the town’s No Place For Hate committee,
but it had already been inactive.

`No matter what, the issue of hate needs to be addressed, whether
through the ADL or not,’ Danehey said. `But the Armenian Genocide also
needs to be addressed.’

While praising the work done by NPFH, the Massachusetts Municipal
Association, previously an official sponsor of NPFH, severed ties with
the program in April because of its affiliation with the national
ADL. It now recommends the National League of Cities Inclusive
Communities program, which can be accessed via nlc.org.

"Many towns have moved beyond NPFH because it’s just not possible,"
Melkonian said. "We know they have done good work and there are good,
committed people behind those programs. Unfortunately they’re now
tainted with this hypocrisy and leaves them unable to do their job in
the manner they would like to do it."

David Boyajian, a freelance journalist and activist, has been asking
towns simply to change the name of their former NPFH programs. He said
his campaign has been "very well received."

"There are other human rights programs," he said. "It’s not as if
we’re against anti-bias programs. It’s just that if you’re an
anti-bias program, you can’t engage in genocide denial and
discriminate against Armenians. It contradicts NPFH’s entire mission."

Norayr Muradkhanian Appointed Head Of Visa And Passport Department

NORAYR MURADKHANIAN APPOINTED HEAD OF VISA AND PASSPORT DEPARTMENT

NOYAN TAPAN

Ju ly 9

By the order of Police Major-General Alik Sargsian, the Head of the
RA Police, Norayr Muradkhanian has been appointed Head of the Visa
and Passport Department. Noyan Tapan was informed about it by the
RA Police Public Relations and Information Department. It should
be mentioned that Alvina Zakarian taking that post formerly has been
lately dismissed by the order of the Police Head, on the basis of point
2, part 1, Article 45, RA law On Service in the Police: a person is
dismissed from service in the Police on his own initiative, on the
basis of a written report, including in connection with retiring on
a long-term service pension.

http://www.nt.am/news.php?shownews=115444

VivaCell participated in the homeblessing ceremony of the Aslanyans

VIVACELL PARTICIPATED IN THE HOMEBLESSING CEREMONY OF THE ASLANYANS

armradio.am
08.07.2008 16:58

Today, the General Manager of VivaCell, a subsidiary of Mobile
TeleSystems OJSC Ralph Yirikian participated in the homeblessing
ceremony of the Aslanyan family house, which is the first out of 15
houses sponsored by the company this year. The cermony was held by
priest Der Dachat Davidyan.

Following the homeblessing ceremony, Ralph Yirikian handed the father
of the family Melikset a Bible. An international volunteer team from
New Jersey who have arrived with the Global Builders Program of Fuller
Center for Housing also participated in the homeblessing event.

The Aslanyans in one of the families who have chosen the hard way of
coming back to homeland. In 2000 leaving their birthplace Javakhq,
Melikset and Yelena came to Armenia wth their 3 children to build
their new home in their historical homeland. In 2002 they bought land
in the village of Arinj and started constructing their own house. But
because of construction material prices getting higher and having
to pay for their children’s education, for more than 5 years they
couldn’t finish the construction of their house and had to rent a flat.

Thanks to VivaCell and Armenian Habitat the family at last had the
opportunity to finish their home and have own corner in their homeland.

Back in 2007 thanks to VivaCell 10 families had an oppotunity to move
to their simple, decent and affordable houses before the Armenian
frozy winter started and to meet the New Year with rebuilt hope and
new dreams.

This year also, in line with its CSR committment, VivaCell will
help 15 more families in 8 communities of Armenia to complete their
half-bult houses and escape from the claws of poverty housing in the
regions. Currently these families live in metal containers, unfinished
houses, in houses in emergency conditions or in rented houses.