People In Need: Black PR Tactics Against Critics In Azerbaijan

PEOPLE IN NEED: BLACK PR TACTICS AGAINST CRITICS IN AZERBAIJAN

11:16 * 03.12.14

In recent days, some Azerbaijani media outlets have launched a black
PR campaign against People in Need (PIN), labelling the organization
as pro-Armenian, Contact.az reports.

The concerted media effort started after PIN presented an exhibition
on political prisoners in Azerbaijan during Eastern Partnership Civil
Society Forum in Batumi in late November.

“The accusations of being pro-Armenian are a common, old method used
by Azerbaijani propaganda to brush off any criticism and to divert
attention from the country’s disastrous human rights record.

This is yet another example of what other international organizations
working on Azerbaijan have faced,” says PIN director ©imon Panek.

Independent and respected international organizations such as Human
Rights Watch and Amnesty International have regularly been accused
of prejudice, bias and “pro-Armenian position”.

PIN has been supporting Azerbaijan’s civil society since 2013. The
Azerbaijani government launched an unprecedented crackdown on country’s
civil society by introducing harsh NGO legislation and jailing human
rights defenders over the past year. “Such an intense and focused
crackdown has no compare in other Eastern Partnership countries
recently. Not even in Belarus,” adds Simon Panek.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/12/03/pin/

Public Is Annoyed With Positive Conclusion On Amulsar Gold Project G

PUBLIC IS ANNOYED WITH POSITIVE CONCLUSION ON AMULSAR GOLD PROJECT GIVEN BY “ENVIRONMENTAL EXPERTISE” SNCO, PRESS CONFERENCE AT “ECOLUR” PRESS CLUB

15:24 December 01, 2014

EcoLur

“Environmental Expertise” SNCO gave a positive conclusion on Amulsar
gold opencast exploitation and cyanide plant construction project.

What do the 6 requirements of Amulsar project realizers mentioned in
the conclusion mean?

What will Gndevaz villagers do who are against cyanide plant
construction in their community?

Under what conditions and pressure was the whole process of expertise
conducted?

The guests at “EcoLur” press club, a resident of Gndevaz village,
journalist Tehmine Yenokyan, member of Teghout Protection Civil
Initiative Artur Grigoryan, member of Pan-Armenian Environmental
Front Levon Galstyan, President of ‘EcoLur” Informational NGO Inga
Zarafyan will speak on the following and other issues. The press
conference will take place at 12 o’clock on December 2, 2014 at
“EcoLur” press club (Hanrapetuyun 49, the building opposite hotel
“Europe”, the entrance from the yard, first floor, penultimate door).

http://ecolur.org/en/news/quotecolurquot-press-club/public-is-annoyed-with-positive-conclusion-on-amulsar-gold-project-given-by-quotenvironmental-expertisequot-snco-press-conference-at-quotecolurquot-press-club/6833/

Turkey Seeks Higher Gas Discounts From Russia

TURKEY SEEKS HIGHER GAS DISCOUNTS FROM RUSSIA

16:16 â~@¢ 02.12.14

Turkey’s counter-offer to Russia for a natural gas discount has not
been finalized yet, the Turkish energy minister said on Tuesday.

“Russia’s discount offer is a positive step towards strengthening
our collaboration, yet we hope to receive a higher discount,” Taner
Yıldız, Turkey’s Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, told
journalists during a press conference in Ankara.

Speaking at a joint press conference with Erdogan on Monday, Putin
had said Russia would reduce the gas price for Turkey by 6 percent,
starting next year, and had agreed to supply Turkey with an additional
3 billion cubic meters. Last year, 13.7 bcm of gas were pumped to
Turkey via Blue Stream.

It is too early now to reflect Russia’s discount offer to Turkish
natural gas consumers, Turkey’s Energy Minister told the press on
Tuesday. He said Turkey’s oil and gas pipeline distribution company
BOTAÃ…~^ still conducts the negotiations over its losses, not profits.

Russia is also thinking of scrapping the South Stream natural gas
pipeline project and may cooperate with Turkey on building a gas hub
for southern Europe, according to the President Vladimir Putin.

Putin said Russia can’t implement the project because of the European
Union’s opposition to it. The $40 billion Gazprom-led project would
have involved running a pipeline under the Black Sea to Bulgaria and
further on to southern Europe.

Armenian News – Tert.am

TripAdvisor: Yerevan 9th Best Travellers’ Choice Destination On The

TRIPADVISOR: YEREVAN 9TH BEST TRAVELLERS’ CHOICE DESTINATION ON THE RISE FOR 2015

13:10, 02 Dec 2014

TripAdvisor announced the winners of its Travellers’ Choice awards for
Destinations on the Rise today. The awards highlights 52 spots around
the world that have seen the greatest increase in positive feedback
and interest from the TripAdvisor community, year-over-year. Lists
were unveiled for World, Asia, Europe, South America, South Pacific
and the United States.

Southeast Asian destinations dominate the awards for places to see in
2015 with the rapidly developing Da Nang, Vietnam named top destination
on the rise in Asia and the world. Other winners include Sihanoukville,
Cambodia which ranks second in Asia and the world while Ao Nang,
Thailand ranks third in Asia and fourth in the world.

Award-winners were determined using an algorithm that primarily
measured the year-over-year increase in positive TripAdvisor traveller
review ratings on accommodations, restaurants, and attractions,
across destinations worldwide.

Travellers’ Choice Destinations on the Rise — Asia:

Da Nang, Vietnam — 122 Hotels, 203 Restaurants, 74 Attractions
Sihanoukville, Cambodia — 53 Hotels, 197 Restaurants, 61 Attractions
Ao Nang, Thailand — 87 Hotels, 157 Restaurants, 78 Attractions Naha,
Japan — 102 Hotels, 1,059 Restaurants, 82 Attractions Male, Maldives
— 38 Hotels, 89 Restaurants, 24 Attractions Baku, Azerbaijan —
92 Hotels, 51 Restaurants, 213 Attractions Leh, India — 51 Hotels,
53 Restaurants, 52 Attractions Kandy, Sri Lanka — 50 Hotels,
73 Restaurants, 75 Attractions Yerevan, Armenia — 50 Hotels, 279
Restaurants, 73 Attractions

Yerevan has been the capital of Armenia since 1918. The city is
immensely rich in history, having been under Arab, Ottoman, Persian
and Soviet rule in the past. TripAdvisor reviewers recommend a visit
to The Museum of Ancient Manuscripts for “excellent display of many
Armenian documents going back over a thousand years.” For a taste of
Armenian cuisine with a French twist, travellers should not miss The
Club Yerevan.

10. Rishikesh, India — 40 Hotels, 68 Restaurants, 66 Attractions

The complete list of Destinations on the Rise award winners, as
well as reviews and candid traveller photos can be viewed here. —
December 2, 2014.

TripAdvisor is an American travel website providing reviews of
travel-related content. It also includes interactive travel forums.

TripAdvisor was an early adopter of user-generated content. The
website services are free to users, who provide most of the content,
and the website is supported by an advertising business model.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/12/02/tripadvisor-yerevan-9th-best-travellers-choice-destination-for-2015/

Une Activiste Armenienne Lance Un Appel Au Soutient A Leyla Yunus Em

UNE ACTIVISTE ARMENIENNE LANCE UN APPEL AU SOUTIENT A LEYLA YUNUS EMPRISONNEE EN AZERBAIDJAN

ARMENIE

Une militante des droits civiques armenienne a exprime sa grave
preoccupation sur le sort de Leyla Yunus, une eminente defenseure des
droits humains emprisonne en Azerbaïdjan sur des accusations douteuses,
a la suite de rapports de deterioration de sa sante.

Laura Baghdasarian, qui dirige un centre de recherche base a Erevan,
a publie jeudi une lettre ouverte a sa collègue azerbaïdjanaise de 58
ans avec qui elle avait realise des projets de medias communs pendant
près d’une decennie, condamnant la poursuite et la pressant de >. Parlant au service armenien de RFE / RL (Azatutyn.am),
Laura Baghdasarian a declare qu’elle avait prefere ne pas parler
jusqu’a maintenant de peur que son soutien et sa sympathie aggravent
la situation de Leyla Yunus et de son mari Arif.

Le couple a ete arrete cet ete sur des accusations de haute trahison
et d’espionnage en faveur de l’Armenie. Les accusations, fermement
dementis par les Yunus, proviennent en grande partie de la cooperation
de Leyla avec des dirigeants d’ONG armeniennes impliquees dans les
initiatives de paix avec d’autres militants de l’Azerbaïdjan. Les
autorites azerbaïdjanaises ont qualifie ces dirigeants, y compris
Laura Baghdasarian, d’agents secrets armeniens.

Laura Baghdasarian, qui riait des affirmations de Bakou a son sujet
plus tôt, a dit qu’elle pensait que l’etat de Yunus ne pouvait pas
etre pire qu’aujourd’hui. Plus tôt cette semaine, l’avocat de Leyla
Yunus, Elchin Qambarov, a parle d’une deterioration drastique de sa
sante. Qambarov a declare a RFE / RL que le medecin qui l’a examine
en prison lui a recemment diagnostique une maladie du foie avancee
et une haute glycemie. >
a ecrit dans sa lettre Laura Baghdasarian, exprimant son indignation
a la recente declaration de Leyla Yunus qu’elle pourrait ne pas vivre
assez longtemps pour voir la prochaine fete du Nouvel An.

>
a declare Laura Baghdasarian.

Elle a decrit le calvaire des Yunus comme une > par les autorites azerbaïdjanaises d’une militante très critique
sur les droits de l’homme. > a-t-elle dit au service armenien de RFE / RL (Azatutyun.am).

Un certain nombre d’organisations internationales ont denonce
l’emprisonnement des Yunus ainsi que des dizaines d’autres detracteurs
du gouvernement azerbaïdjanais. Mais selon Laura Baghdasarian, la
communaute internationale ne fait pas assez pour tenir compte de
Bakou. Elle a parle notamment des instances europeennes, affirmant
qu’ils ferment les yeux sur les violations des droits humains en
Azerbaïdjan et appliquent > pour le
pays riche en petrole et son leadership autocratique.

mardi 2 decembre 2014, Stephane (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=105727

Armenian Genocide Film And Discussion Take Centre Stage In London

ARMENIAN GENOCIDE FILM AND DISCUSSION TAKE CENTRE STAGE IN LONDON

14:14, 02 Dec 2014

On Tuesday, 25 November 2014, the Armenian clubs at the School of
African and Oriental Studies (SOAS) and University College of London
(UCL) screened an unusual and compelling observational documentary on
the Armenian Genocide, “The Blue Book. Political Truth or Historical
Fact ,” by Gagik Karageuzian (Ani Sounds, London). The screening took
place at SOAS and drew a good number of students. Among the guests
were filmmaker Gagik Karageuzian and the historian Ara Sarafian
(Gomidas Institute), who featured prominently in the film.

“The Blue Book” is an observational documentary following Ara
Sarafian between 2006-2008, when he engaged the Armenian Genocide
issue in London, Istanbul, Ankara and Elazig in Turkey. Much of the
film was shot in archives, conferences, TV studios, and the killings
fields of eastern Turkey. His discussions with Turkish intellectuals,
journalists and deniers are particularly interesting, giving viewers a
unique perspective into the Armenian Genocide as a contemporary issue.

The screening of “The Blue Book” led to a fascinating discussion.

Following the London screening, Gagik Karagheuzian agreed to an
interview with Nora Vosbigian about his film.

N.V.: How do you know Ara Sarafian and why did you approach him to
make such a documentary?

G.K.: I met Ara in the late nineties. I wanted to make a documentary
film about the Armenian Genocide and its denial. My background was
very much in the observational style of documentary filmmaking. At
the time I didn’t think I would be able to film on this subject in
Turkey, but once I met Ara I realised that with his involvement this
was possible. We needed to find the right approach to the subject. In
2005 the Turkish Grand National Assembly (TGNA) presented a petition
to the British Parliament saying the 1916 Blue Book on the Armenian
Genocide authored by British parliamentarians was based on lies
and the British should apologise to Turkey. Ara had republished the
critical edition of the Blue Book in 2000 and he was the expert on
this subject. So I asked him to allow me to make an observational style
documentary about his efforts to respond to the TGNA accusations. The
filming started in 2005 and the final sequence was shot in 2009.

N.V.: Did you expect him to agree to such a documentary and what were
your expectations?

G.K.: When I met Ara he was interested in working with film makers
on the issue of the Armenian Genocide, but he was very careful who
he worked with. When I told him I wanted to make films on this issue
he suggested we work on a few smaller projects first, to get know
each other’s working style. By 2005, when the TGNA petition arrived
in London, we had already been working together for six years and
had been to Turkey twice to make other films. When I approached him
about making the Blue Book documentary, the issue was not whether
we could work together but could we sustain working on a demanding
project like this. I knew I wouldn’t be able to take a film crew with
me, I had to be subtle and not attract attention to me while he was
dealing with Turkish and other politicians and historians. I knew he
was apprehensive, but he also knew these events were very important
and needed to be documented. So both of us felt we had to take on
these risks.

N.V.: What were Sarafian’s conditions for your co-operation? Was he
easy to work with?

G.K.: Ara’s main concern was that filming did not interfere with his
work. For example, my presence stopping people from talking to him,
because they did not want to be on camera. Also he did not want to
“act for the camera” – he wanted a very honest depiction of the
events. Not only did I feel these demands were possible, this was
the style of film I wanted to make!

N.V.: What were the dynamics of actually working with Sarafian? How
were decisions made to do things? Did he discuss what he was doing
with you? How were you prepared for shooting your footage on a day
to day basis?

G.K.: As I mention earlier, when I started filming the Blue Book,
I had already worked with Ara on other smaller projects, so we had
established a working relationship. He would explain to me what
was going to happen in any particular day, and whether it would be
interesting to film it or not. I would discuss with him what I had
filmed and what would be useful to portray what was happening. For
example he would ask if he should agree to an interview with
a particular journalist, I would say it could be useful way of
summarising the events of that day and give us an insight into the
thinking of the people at that place and time.

N.V.: How much footage did you shoot, and how did you come up with
the final cut?

G.K.: I filmed Ara from 2005 until 2009. The total footage shot
during this time came to about 100 hours. I made two versions of the
Blue Book. First one subtitled “Witnessing History” (77 minutes)
focused on his overall approach in dealing with the TGNA petition
and the denial of the Armenian Genocide. The second version which
I am releasing this year, “Political Truth or Historical Fact” (54
minutes) still shows the denial process but concentrated on the 2006
symposium where Ara came face to face with the Turkish historians
and politicians who deny the Armenian Genocide.

N.V.: What were some of the memorable moments, on or off camera?

G.K.: While filming in the Kharpet region, where Consul Leslie Davis
had witnessed the remains of massacred caravans of Armenians, we got
a flat tyre. I stayed with the car while Ara went off with a local
18 year old to find a jack to prop the car up. It turned out that
the uncle of the 18 year old had the right jack, but he refused to
help, advising his nephew, the son of the mayor of that village, not
to help this “gavour” (infidel, unbeliever). Ara said the boy told
his uncle that he could not help how he (the uncle) behaved but he,
as a good Muslim, had to help a person in need. He managed to find a
jack from elsewhere and helped us change the tyre. In my experience,
this 18 year old was not in the minority in the region or in most
areas that we visited in Turkey. Most of the people that we met,
when they realised we were Armenian, expressed sorrow at what had
happened in 1915.

N.V. What do you hope to achieve with such a film?

G.K.: I have seen many films dealing with the Armenian Genocide.

Obviously all of them portray Armenians as victims. While this was
true of Armenians in 1915 and immediately after the Genocide, it is
not true of Armenians today. We are not victims. My intentions as an
Armenian filmmaker is to show this. Ara Sarafian’s approach to his
work and his ethics, I find, are empowering. I hope to share these
experiences through this documentary. In fact, I recently re-edited the
original cut of “The Blue Book, Political Truth or Historical Fact,”
to bring focus to the issue of empowerment as part of the upcoming
100th year Armenian Genocide commemoration.

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/12/02/armenian-genocide-film-and-discussion-take-centre-stage-in-london/

ANKARA: Four Churches Meet in Turkey as Pope Aims for Christian Unit

Daily Sabah, Turkey
Nov 30 2014

FOUR CHURCHES MEET IN TURKEY AS POPE AIMS FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY

The spiritual head of the Catholic world, Pope Francis, and the
ecumenical patriarch of the Eastern Orthodox Church, Bartholomew I,
issue a message of unity from Istanbul and call for an end to the
millennium-old schism that divides Christianity

Daily Sabah

ISTANBUL ‘ Spiritual leaders from the Catholic and Orthodox Churches
signed a Common Declaration on Sunday in an attempt to forge stronger
ties between the two flocks and called for interfaith dialogue.
Leaders of the Armenian and Assyrian Orthodox Churches of Turkey were
also present at the joint Mass conducted by Ecumenical Patriarch
Bartholomew and Roman Catholic Pope Francis.

The Mass was interpreted by some as cementing efforts to heal the
1,000-year-old schism between the 300 million followers of Orthodox
Christianity and the world’s 1.2 billion Roman Catholics. “We cannot
resign ourselves to a Middle East without Christians,” the pope and
patriarch said in a joint statement, noting that members of the faith
have lived in the region for 2,000 years.

Pope Francis and Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew, the Istanbul-based
leader of many of the world’s Orthodox Christians, met at the
Patriarchate in Istanbul as part of the three-day visit of the 77-year
old pontiff in Turkey. The two leaders emphasized the importance of
the declaration for “Christian unity and momentous impact on the
suffering of Christians in the Middle East.”

“We also recognize the importance of promoting a constructive dialogue
with Islam based on mutual respect and friendship,” the joint common
declaration said. “Inspired by common values and strengthened by
genuine fraternal sentiments, Muslims and Christians are called to
work together for the sake of justice, peace and respect for the
dignity and rights of every person, especially in those regions where
they once lived for centuries in peaceful coexistence and now
tragically suffer together the horrors of war.”The declaration was
signed after the Divine Liturgy to commemorate the feast of St. Andrew
the Apostle on Nov. 30. Along with Pope Francis, Greek Foreign
Minister Evangelos Venizelos, Turkey’s chief rabbi, Itzhak Helava, as
well as senior figures from other Christian churches attended the
service celebrated by Bartholomew.

Bartholomew became the first Orthodox patriarch to ever attend a papal
inauguration ceremony since the split between the two churches when he
took part in Pope Francis’s inauguration last year at the Vatican. The
leaders of Catholic and Orthodox Christianity also called for an end
to the conflict in Ukraine and “respect for international law” in
resolving the violence. Vatican spokesman Federico Lombardi said there
was still a way to go before there could be true and total unification
of the churches, but noted that the pope and patriarch have been
meeting frequently in an “incredibly friendly, cordial way.”

As part of his interfaith efforts during the trip, Francis also met
Turkey’s chief rabbi on Sunday, after spending time with Muslim
leaders on Saturday.

During the second day of his visit, Francis and Bartholomew prayed for
world peace on Saturday in the Church of St. George. The service took
place after Francis celebrated a special Mass at the Catholic
Cathedral of the Holy Spirit in the city’s BeyoÄ?lu district.

In 2006, Pope Francis’ predecessor, Benedict XVI visited the same
mosque during a visit to Turkey.

http://www.dailysabah.com/politics/2014/11/30/four-churches-meet-in-turkey-as-pope-aims-for-christian-unity

ISTANBUL: Muslims discovered Earth is round – Turkey’s science min

Hurriyet Daily News, Turkey
Nov 29 2014

Muslims discovered Earth is round, Turkey’s science minister says

ISTANBUL

Muslim scientists working around 1,200 years ago were the first to
determine that the Earth is a sphere, Turkey’s science, industry and
technology minister, becoming the latest Turkish official to inform
the world about apparent scientific firsts on the part of Islamic
world.

Speaking at a reception for business leader in the Central Anatolian
province of Konya late Nov. 28, Minister Fikri IÅ?ık stressed the
contributions of the Islamic world to science throughout history.
“Some 700-800 years before Galileo, 71 Muslim scientists led by
al-Khwarizmi convened by the order of the Caliph Al-Ma’mun and
revealed that the Earth is a sphere,” he said. IÃ…?ık added that a copy
of the original document is currently in the Museum of Islamic Science
and Technology in Istanbul.

The museum was founded by Fuat Sezgin, a Turkish professor emeritus on
Arabic-Islamic science who was recently referred by Turkish President
Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an, too. During a speech on Nov. 18, ErdoÄ?an quoted
Sezgin’s theories for his controversial claim that the American
continent was “discovered by Muslim sailors” some 300 years before
Christopher Columbus.

The concept of a spherical Earth remained a matter of philosophical
speculation until the 3rd century BC, when Hellenistic astronomy
established the spherical shape of the earth as a physical given.

Galileo Galilei, on the other hand, was put to trial and convicted by
the Roman Catholic Inquisition in 1616 and 1633 for his support of
heliocentrism, a theory which is not directly related to the notion
that the Earth is a sphere. Heliocentrism, the theory that the Earth
was a planet that revolved around the Sun, contradicted geocentrism,
the Aristotelian view that the earth was the center of the universe,
which agreed with a literal interpretation of the Bible.

Around 830 AD, Caliph Al-Ma’mun commissioned a group of Muslim
astronomers and geographers to measure the distance from Tadmur
(Palmyra) to Raqqah in modern Syria. They calculated the Earth’s
circumference, reaching to numbers very close to the currently modern
values.

Today, the war-torn Raqqah is known as the stronghold of the Islamic
State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) militants.

November/29/2014

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/Default.aspx?pageID=238&nID=74989&NewsCatID=338

Pope Francis’ visit to Turkey puts spotlight on region’s Christians

Los Angeles Times
Nov 30 2014

Pope Francis’ visit to Turkey puts spotlight on region’s Christians

By Umar Farooq

Dressed in a neatly pressed dark suit, Bedri Diril, 41, stood
patiently Saturday among a crowd of hundreds in front of St. Esprit
Cathedral in Istanbul awaiting the arrival of Pope Francis.

“We Christians do have problems here, but they are not brought up in
public much,” Diril said, clutching a cherished invitation to Mass
with the pontiff, one of only a few hundred such invites distributed
among the city’s dwindling Christian communities. “Me and some of my
friends, we no longer wear crosses, or we put them inside our shirts,
[to hide] being Christian,” he said.

Francis arrived in Istanbul on Saturday on the second day of his
three-day visit to this overwhelmingly Muslim nation. His agenda
included meetings with fellow clerics, both Muslim and Christian, and
visits to the city’s landmarks, including Sultan Ahmed (the Blue
Mosque), and Hagia Sophia, the former Orthodox cathedral that was
converted into a mosque and then into a museum, its status for most of
the last century.

In Ankara on Friday, the pope cast a spotlight on the flight of
religious minorities from Iraq and Syria, where Christians and others
face persecution by Sunni Muslim extremists.

“Hundreds of thousands of persons have been forced to abandon their
homes and countries in order to survive and remain faithful to their
religious beliefs,” the pope said.

For many Christian Turks, the exodus reminds them of their own
nation’s legacy of intolerance for Christians, a history that Turkish
society has still not entirely accepted.

A century ago, Christians accounted for as much as 20% of the
population of Turkey. Today, Christians and other non-Muslims make up
less than 1% of all Turks.

An Assyrian Christian turned Roman Catholic, Diril moved to Istanbul
with his family 22 years ago, a time when violence between the Turkish
military and Kurdish rebels made life difficult in their village in
eastern Turkey. Nationalist Turks antagonistic to the Kurds were also
hostile to Assyrians, Diril said.

“Even though we were Turkish citizens, they called us foreigners,” he said.

Religious diversity was once much more a part of life in Turkey. A
hundred years ago, in the waning days of the Ottoman Empire, Istanbul
was home to large numbers of non-Muslims, including Greek and Armenian
Christians and a sizable Jewish community. Today, about 120,000
Christians remain in the entire country.

Hundreds of thousands of Armenian Christians were deported in 1915-18,
many violently, resulting in the deaths of as many as 1.5 million
people, the first genocide of the 20th century. The Turkish
government, successor to the Ottoman empire, rejects the term
“genocide” and says the deaths of Armenians and others at the time
were the result of war, displacement, disease and other factors.

After World War I, hundreds of thousands of Greek Orthodox Christians
were forced out as part of a population exchange that saw Muslim
Greeks sent to Turkey. Additional expulsions of Greek Orthodox
Christians followed.

Decades later, many Christians say they still sense resentment.

“They hate us, they want to finish us off,” Simon Barsamian, a young
Armenian said at the Armenian Patriarchal Church, one of only 34
functioning Armenian churches in Turkey.

The Armenian Patriarchate was established in 1461, eight years after
Ottoman Turks overran Constantinople, now Istanbul.

“We don’t get much trouble from the Islamists,” Barsamian said. “Our
problems are usually from nationalists.”

In the last decade, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and
Development Party, or AKP, which has Islamist roots, has made a series
of conciliatory overtures. Universities have held conferences to
discuss the Armenian deaths, the centenary of which will be marked
next year throughout the Armenian diaspora community.

The Turkish government has returned some property seized from
minorities, introduced Christianity into theology classes in schools,
and publicly acknowledged the events of 1915-18, while still denying a
mass extermination of Armenians.

“We don’t know the AKP’s real intentions,” said Nejla Karabulut, one
of a small number of Turkish Muslims hoping to catch a glimpse of the
pope at St. Esprit Cathedral. “They use religion for politics.”

The reforms are inadequate, she says, attributing them to the ruling
party’s desire to build support among minorities against a secular,
often nationalist, opposition.

“There is still a very long way to go,” said Karin Karakasli, a former
editor of Agos, a prominent Armenian-Turkish newspaper, pointing out
that Turkey’s border with Armenia remains closed, and leading
politicians still refer to Armenians as “traitors.”

In 2007, a Turkish nationalist gunned down the newspaper’s editor,
Hrant Dink, after he highlighted the fate of Turkey’s Armenians. One
person was convicted of the murder, but a wider investigation that
appeared to implicate the military, police and politicians was
abruptly halted.

(In 1981, Mehmet Ali Agca, a member of a Turkish ultra-nationalist
organization known as the Gray Wolves, shot and wounded Pope John Paul
II in St. Peter’s Square in Vatican City. The pontiff recuperated and
later forgave Agca for the assassination attempt.)

Karakasli says many Turks are moving on in regard to the Armenian
issue, even if their government remains reticent about the
catastrophic events.

“Younger Turks have questioned the official history … [for] more
than a decade,” she said. “There are alternative sources for research;
talking about the issue is no longer a taboo.”

Farooq is a special correspondent. Times staff writer Patrick J.
McDonnell in Beirut contributed to this report.

http://www.latimes.com/world/europe/la-fg-pope-turkey-20141129-story.html

BAKU: Azerbaijani expert on West’s attitude to Azerbaijan, Iran’s n-

Trend Oil & Gas – Azerbaijan
November 27, 2014 Thursday 5:01 PM GMT +4

Azerbaijani expert on West’s attitude to Azerbaijan, Iran’s n-program,
oil prices

Baku, Azerbaijan, Nov. 27
Trend:

Trend Agency conducted a Q&A with Sidqi Shevket, Ph.D. in Law, head of
the Azeri Daily website, to discuss such topics as West’s attitude
towards Azerbaijan, Iran’s nuclear program of Iran, oil prices and
more.

Q: How do you assess the international response to the incident with
the Armenian helicopter? How in fact is Azerbaijan’s position
currently being estimated in the West – as of an ally? Why is it
possible to observe the so-called ‘witch-hunt’ against Azerbaijan in
the Western media, given that Azerbaijan has already proved to be a
genuine ally of the West? Can we then talk about the impact of certain
influential groups on the western politicians?

A: In general, the international response to the incident with the
downed Armenian helicopter was quite predictable. We have heard before
those time after time repeated statements about the inadmissibility of
escalation of the conflict, the need to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict by peaceful means, etc. Probably, it would be naive on our
part to expect that a violation of the airspace of Azerbaijan by
Armenian military aviation could somehow impel the international
community to act more forcefully against Armenia as an aggressor.

At the same time, the Armenian side too should not expect any
condemnation of Azerbaijan for the downed helicopter. Perhaps now more
than ever, the international community, at least in words, has
estimated the incident, well, not quite objectively yet, but at any
rate without a clear bias towards one side. As for the West’s attitude
towards Azerbaijan, it is worth noting that this attitude is not only
determined by the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh, but also by many
other factors of a geopolitical nature.

As you know, Azerbaijan is situated in an extremely important
geostrategic position at the junction of transport corridors
North-South and East-West. Therefore, the foreign policy of our
country interests not only our immediate neighbours, but also many
other global players. And no matter how balanced is our foreign
policy, there will always be centers of power, which will be
dissatisfied with one or another of our initiatives in the
international arena.

At the same time Azerbaijan indeed proved itself a reliable ally of
the West, at least in matters of energy security and the fight against
terrorism, which today is so important for the West and the European
Union in particular. However, if in the past Baku’s relatively neutral
position suited the powers competing at the geopolitical field, today,
these key actors crossed the Rubicon, and there is a strong likelihood
that the world is once again entering an era of a new Cold War. In
this case, it will be extremely difficult to remain neutral.
Apparently, the era of balanced foreign policy is nearing its end.

With regard to certain groups, which could influence the Western
governments, then, first of all, it would be worth noting a rather
strong and cohesive Armenian diaspora, which, in particular, has a
special weight in such key countries as the United States and France.
The fact that the OSCE Minsk Group consists of these two countries,
plus Russia, whose preferences are well known, leads us to question
the impartiality of this structure. If the co-chairs do come out with
balanced and diplomatically consistent statements, including about the
latest incident, it does not mean that they, or rather the countries
they represent, act in the same manner. Unfortunately, here as well we
are faced with the notorious policy of double standards, well, even
triple ones, I would say. Of course, we need to work more closely with
these countries, especially in the sphere of information policy, which
today is not at the proper level.

Q: How do you think will the talks between Iran and ‘5+1’ go, given
that at the last meeting an agreement has been postponed once more?

A: Indeed, despite all efforts to reach a comprehensive agreement on
the Iranian nuclear program by the November 24 deadline, the sides
failed to do so. And the extension of the deadline obviously raises
many questions about what direction will the sides now move in, and,
in general, whether such an agreement is possible at all. However,
there are no reasons yet to talk about the failure of the
negotiations. And that is a plus.

The parties have agreed on a new seven-month extension of the
negotiation process; and they do speak quite optimistically about the
prospects of reaching the final agreement. Both Iran and the United
States expressed confidence that such an agreement would still be
concluded. Apparently, the parties today genuinely benefit from such
an extension of the negotiation process, as the only alternative would
be their complete failure. And the latter is fraught with major shocks
for quite an unstable region of the Greater Middle East.

One way or another, but even during the last round of negotiations,
the parties apparently managed to get closer on a number of positions,
which gives hope to reach the long waited comprehensive agreement in
the new year. Especially, since the Republican control of the US
Congress gained at this year’s midterm elections is also, oddly
enough, of some help to the American delegation at the talks.

Any problems with the tightening of sanctions against Iran can now be
attributed to political opponents, whereas any breakthroughs can be
presented to the Iranian side as a manifestation of the White House’s
good will. Kind of a carrot and stick tactics. And given Iran’s
current somewhat uneasy economic situation, Tehran will still have to
compromise in order to finally get rid of the suffocating sanctions
imposed by the West. In any case, the parties are clearly aware of
their responsibility in this explosive geopolitical situation.

Q: The trend of falling oil prices continues at the world oil market;
the price has fallen to the lowest level in four years. What in your
opinion is the optimal oil price today? And to what extent could
non-OPEC oil-producing countries, such as Russia, Azerbaijan and
Kazakhstan affect the situation at the market; and is it possible in
the future to increase their role in the management of price trends?

A: First, I would like to note that the drop in oil prices is not
solely the result of objective tendencies of the world economy.
Although the market is still the basic factor. The market determines
the demand and supply, on basis of which the price of oil or any other
commodity is formed. At the same time, geopolitical factors,
certainly, play a very important role here. The largest oil fields are
known to be highly concentrated in volatile regions; and any political
crisis in one or another oil-producing country or a group of them
immediately echoes at the world markets.

As for the impact on global markets, probably in the near future it
will be very difficult to undermine the leading position of the OPEC
oil cartel, which actually has been created to coordinate the actions
of the largest oil producing nations to build their competitive
prices.

It is worth noting that according to the available official data, the
OPEC countries together produce about 33 million barrels of crude oil
per day, accounting for nearly 40 percent of world production. In
addition, the OPEC member-countries account for almost 81 percent of
all proven reserves of crude oil in the world.

The combined share of Russia, Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan in world oil
production is only just over 18 percent. That is not taking into
account the fact that recently Russian production rates declined
slightly. In order to have an impact on pricing in the oil sector it
would be necessary to create a new cartel at least equal to the OPEC,
and to do so will be even more difficult in the future, given the
mentioned figure of proven global oil reserves. And we should bear in
mind that interests of the oil-producing countries, which are outside
the OPEC, are too different for them to manage reducing to a common
denominator. Thus, today, the last word remains with the OPEC.

Edited by SI