Shirak Torosyan: Some Political Processes In Georgia Affect The Arme

SHIRAK TOROSYAN: SOME POLITICAL PROCESSES IN GEORGIA AFFECT THE ARMENIAN COMMUNITY
Karen Ghazaryan

“Radiolur”
24.05.2011 16:33

President of the Javakhk Patriotic Union Shirak Torosyan today
refrained from giving any assessment to the political developments
in Georgia. However, there are processes which somehow affect the
Georgian Armenian community, he said. According to him, the Armenian
community faces the problem of what approach to assume and what to do.

“There is no common position among the community organizations,
and that’s incorrect,” the MP said.

According to Shirak Torosyan, Javakhk Armenians should be distinguished
from the Georgian Armenian community, since the political behavior
of the two is somewhat different. There is no common stance, and as
Georgian citizen, every Armenian decides for himself, which one it
wants to support. Usually, the national minorities in any country
support the incumbent authorities.

Shirak Torosyan says the Georgian Armenian community can be united
only in one case. For instance, this may happen if the opposition
gives concrete promises, let’s say regarding the recognition of the
Armenian Genocide or the solution of the issue of the status of the
Georgian Diocese of the Armenian Apostolic Church.

“However, none of the opposition figures has promised anything,
which makes Georgian Armenians act behave as individual citizens,
not as a united community,” the MP said

Genocide Armenien: Strategie Au-Dela De La Penalisation

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN: STRATEGIE AU-DELA DE LA PENALISATION

Source/Lien : Lygeros.org
Publie le : 24-05-2011

Info Collectif VAN – – Le Collectif VAN vous
propose cet article mis a notre disposition par son auteur le Pr N.

Lygeros.

N. Lygeros

Après cet echec cuisant mais previsible dans le cadre du contexte
politique francais, nous ne devons pas seulement nous interroger sur
la cause de son existence mais surtout sur les possibilites de passer
outre la decision du Senat, dans la legalite bien sûr. En effet,
le debat semble clos auprès de nombreux observateurs mais aussi
des combattants de la cause armenienne. Certes les premiers pensent
assister a un jeu couru d’avance et les seconds avoir ete manipules
pour des raisons geopolitiques. Ce n’est pas necessairement faux comme
raisonnement, mais cela ne represente qu’une de ses facettes et le
reduire a celle-ci correspondrait a une erreur strategique pour la
cause. Il est tout d’abord clair que l’ensemble de la problematique
du genocide s’inscrit dans un cadre geopolitique aussi cela n’a pas
de sens de s’etonner des repercussions de celle-ci. Quant au jeu, il
est evident qu’en jouant dans un coin de l’echiquier et uniquement
de temps en temps, cela ne permet pas de prevoir les coups car il
existe d’une part l’effet horizon et d’autre part l’effet horizon.

Il est necessaire de repenser notre approche dans un nouveau champ
d’action tout en restant dans le meme cadre geopolitique puisque
l’exclure de celui-ci relève d’un non-sens. Hors du champ d’action
national nous avons celui de l’Union Europeenne et en particulier
du Parlement europeen où le mode operatoire n’est pas national mais
partisan. Ceci permettra d’ailleurs de clarifier les positions de
chacun vis-a-vis de son parti politique puisqu’il n’existera plus
l’excuse d’ordre national. Dans le Parlement Europeen, nous avons un
element fonctionnel de base, a savoir la reconnaissance du genocide
des Armeniens depuis 1987. Sur celui-ci, il est possible de mener
une action qui semble initialement generaliste mais qui prend tout
son sens, une fois deployee et mise en place. Notre objectif ne doit
pas etre specifique au premier abord pour ne pas avoir a subir les
memes pressions qu’en France. Aussi nous devons nous concentrer sur
sa genericite et appliquer un mix strategique au niveau des pouvoirs
politiques des Etats membres de l’Union Europeenne. Ce qui doit etre
clairement annonce c’est la poursuite du processus de reparation et
presenter la penalisation comme simplement le second stade de celui-ci
après la reconnaissance.

Il suffit donc de prôner et de faire la promotion au niveau des partis
politiques du Parlement Europeen, de la volonte de penaliser toute
negation des reconnaissances passees et futures du Parlement europeen.

Il n’existe rien de specifique, aucune cible particulière. La notion de
genocide via la charte des Nations Unies et la reconnaissance existe
en temps qu’action au niveau du Parlement Europeen. Il s’agit donc
d’effectuer une extension de ces notions, toujours dans le cadre du
processus de reparation et d’appliquer ceci de manière generique a
tout genocide reconnu. Nous pensons d’ailleurs qu’il est possible
d’etendre cette manière d’operer a tous les crimes contre l’humanite.

Seulement, la mise en evidence et exergue de la notion de genocide
permet de traiter le noyau du problème quitte a l’etendre par la
suite. Par ailleurs il permet la convergence assuree du mix strategique
independamment des sensibilites initiales de chacun dans le cadre de
son parti. Cette manière d’agir permet de desenclaver notre approche
actuelle et nous assure une strategie robuste et coherente au-dela
de la penalisation.

Retour a la rubrique

www.collectifvan.org

Une Delegation Du CHP A Visite Le Patriarcat Armenien D’Istanbul

UNE DELEGATION DU CHP A VISITE LE PATRIARCAT ARMENIEN D’ISTANBUL
Stephane

armenews.com
lundi 24 mai 2011

Le vice president du parti du Peuple Republicain ou CHP et le
Representant pour la Politique Etrangère Osman Koruturk et le
Secretaire general Bihlun Tamayligil ont fait une visite au Patriarcat
armenien.

La visite a dure 1h30. Ils ont ete recus par le Patriarche en exercice
l’Archeveque Aram Atesyan au Patriarcat armenien et la reunion etait
interdite a la presse.

Repondant aux questions du journal Hurriyet après la reunion, Osman
Koruturk a parle de 1915 et a dit : ” Les deux côtes ont eprouve des
peines, il serait injuste de dire qu’ils sont unilateraux. Les deux
partis rivaux le CHP et l’AKP ont mis a l’ordre du jour la proposition
d’etablir une commission d’histoire. Neanmoins, la proposition n’a
pas ete approuvee en Armenie “.

Questionne sur l’absence de Arev Cebeci aux elections parlementaires
en tant que candidat de la communaute armenienne Osman Koruturk a dit
que le parti ne selectionnait pas les gens selon leurs identites. ”
Plus de 4300 personnes ont postule et 550 d’entre eux ont gagne. Nous
n’avons pas de depute armenien dans le Parlement de la part de notre
parti. Cependant, nous avons des citoyens d’origine armenienne ayant
de bonnes positions dans l’administration du CHP et a des niveaux
locaux “. Affirmant que les minorites sont cruciales pour le CHP,
Osman Koruturk a dit que la parti respectait tous les droits reconnus
aux minorites dans le cadre du Traite de Lausanne.

Un des presidents de la Fondation armenienne d’Istanbul Bedros
Marzubanyan a affirme que les recentes declarations du chef du
CHP Kemal Kilicdaroglu avaient deplu a la communaute armenienne. ”
Certaines personnes ont dit que la mère de Kilicdaroglu etait une
armenienne du Dersim et il a essaye de prouver que sa mère n’est
pas une armenienne. Je voudrais lui demander si etre un armenien est
vraiment une si mauvaise chose après tout “.

Malgre cela ils sont les bienvenus car la porte est ouverte a
chacun, a dit Marzubanyan. ” Le CHP est le rival le plus proche du
gouvernement. Donc, connaître leurs avis est dans notre interet ”
a-t-il dit.

” Il devrait y avoir au moins deux parlementaires armeniens, un dans
le gouvernement et dans l’opposition. Il est dit a chaque occasion
que la Turquie est une mosaïque. Si le Parlement est une place où
cette mosaïque est representee et c’est le cas autant que je sache,
donc les pièces manquantes de la mosaïque doivent etre achevees. Nous
avons des maires mais maintenant nous voulons envoyer un representant
au Parlement ” a dit Marzubanyan, qui a accentue le fait que les
50000 armeniens en Turquie n’ont pas de simple representant dans
le Parlement.

Former Armenian prisoner to sue Azerbaijan

Former Armenian prisoner to sue Azerbaijan

news.am
May 21, 2011 | 20:58

YEREVAN. – Vanadzor based Popeleks attorney office will sue Azerbaijan
for two-year illegal custody and torture of Armenian citizen. The
office will file the case to European Court of Human Rights next
month.

In May 2010 Azerbaijan handed over to Armenian side a native of Tavush
region Haghartsin village Arthur Badalyan, 32, who lost his way in
forest and, accidentally crossing the border, fell captive to Azeris
two years ago.

The lawyers claim that Azerbaijan violated third article of European
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
which asserts that nobody must be subjected to torture, inhuman and
depredating treatment or punishment.

Before sending the complaint to European Court of Human Rights, the
attorney office will have to contact Azerbaijan authorities from the
territory of a third country, asking to provide information on the
conditions of the custody. This is the general procedure to apply to
European Court.

According to lawyers the Court will take several years to make the
decision. They think this experience could become a precedent for all
other cases reports Radio Liberty.

Boundless Tagore

Shifting Images
Boundless Tagore

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Milia AliRabindranath Tagore’s message of humanity guided me through
the various phases of my life. It sharpened my power of introspection
and helped me develop a compassionate outlook toward the world at
large. In the process I learned to confront life’s challenges with a
degree of equanimity.

“My Golden Bengal, I love you.”

Turbulent tides of change swept through our country in the late
sixties — a change that altered the map of the Indian sub-continent.
It impacted the lives of Bengalis in a major way, leading to the
creation of Bangladesh — a homeland for the people of former East
Pakistan. Even before Bangladesh came into being, the region was
overpowered by a surge of patriotism that sowed the seeds of Bengali
nationalism. Tagore’s literary works were an integral part of this
movement.

Like many of my generation, my pride in Bengali culture and heritage
was rooted in Tagore’s writings. I developed a natural love for
Bengali music early in life when I started to take lessons in Rabindra
Sangeet at home and in the music school, Chhayanaut, under the
tutelage of Wahidul Haq. The latter introduced me to the fascinating
world of Tagore’s songs in a manner that helped me appreciate their
nuances and intricacies. Consequently, Rabindra Sangeet generated an
ownership of Bengali language and ethos in me, to the extent that,
when the movement for a separate Bengali entity took root, I embraced
it as a struggle for my own identity.

If I were to single out the defining moment of my life, it was when I
crossed the border from Bangladesh to India in June 1971, to
participate in the Liberation War. Unwittingly, I had stepped into a
very important crossroad of history and was destined to be a part of a
momentous era. I joined a group of Bangladeshi musicians and roamed
the camps for the displaced Bengalis who had taken refuge in India. We
sang Tagore’s patriotic songs to keep the spirit of a “free
Bangladesh” alive for the unfortunate thousands who were dislocated
and demoralised. Through this rare experience I realised that, along
with the struggle for Bangladesh’s independence, my inner struggle for
a greater identity had begun and continues until today.

The forced exile in India was yet another step toward getting to know
the real “Robi Thakur.” It took me to his ashram “Santiniketan” where
I met my music gurus — legends Kanika Banerjee and Nilima Sen — and
other notable Tagore personalities like Debabrata Biswas and Shubha
Guhathakurta. I was but a novice trying to make a modest entry into
the Rabindra Sangeet world.

What I discovered was that, in the monastic environ of Tagore’s
ashram, egos had been shed. Hence, an insignificant young girl from a
country with only a name but no territory was readily accepted into
the affectionate fold of his disciples! In addition to Rabindra
Sangeet, my gurus taught me the virtues of humility and dedication
through the precept of their own lifestyles. I was offered a small
niche in the extended family of Tagore singers, which I accepted with
immense gratitude.

“Thou hast made me known to friends whom I knew not, thou hast given
me seats in homes not my own.”

Life’s voyage took me to other lands and other cultures. I walked
unknown paths and journeyed through new territory. However, every time
I felt lonely and desolate, I was reconnected to my roots through
Tagore. Every significant interaction and experience was related to
him: whether it was teaching “Ami chini go chini” ( I know you, know
you, Oh, maiden of a distant land) to street children in Yerevan,
Armenia, or organising his birthday celebrations in Bucharest,
Romania, with fellow Bangladeshi and Indian artists Saadi Mohammad,
Nilanajana Sen, Shibli Mohammad and Shamim Ara Nipa.

Tagore provided me with the opportunity to show case the cultural
treasures of my native land and helped me bond with people in most
unusual ways. In Armenia, I developed a unique friendship with a
70-year-old Armenian painter, Armine Kalentz, who, in our first
meeting, recited the Russian translation of Tagore’s “A Tamed Bird Was
in a Cage.” I remember her doleful expression as she repeated the last
lines of the poem:

They flutter their wings in yearning, and sing, “Come closer, my love!”

The free bird cries, “It cannot be, I fear the closed doors of the cage.”

The cage bird whispers, “Alas, my wings are powerless and dead.”

Armine explained that, in the former Soviet Union, she was barred from
expressing her artistic views in the passionate and free style that
she longed for. Therefore, she often recited this poem in solitude to
vent her frustrations. Whenever we met, Armine would invariably ask me
to sing Rabindra Sangeet. I found a friend and confidante in a country
where I knew almost no one. Truly, Tagore “brought the distant near
and made a brother of the stranger.”

“Thou hast made me endless such is thy pleasure. This frail vessel
thou emptiest again and again, and fillest it ever with fresh life.”

Last month, I was sitting in my home in Virginia, USA, on a rainy
afternoon, and humming strands of Rabindr Sangeet. Lost in a daydream,
I felt nostalgic about my childhood friends, the monsoons of Bengal,
the afternoon tea sessions and idle chit-chats with family, and, even
the clamour of loud conversations and honking cars in Dhaka. But above
all, I missed my music which is no longer in the centre stage of my
life, primarily because I am in a setting where Tagore is not part of
the mainstream.

Reluctantly, I have accepted the fact that the singer Milia Ali, like
T.S. Eliot’s Alfred Prufrock, is not destined to play Hamlet on the
Tagore stage, but can at best be described as “an attendant lord
to…start a scene or two.” However, my desire to express myself through
my songs has never waned, although some days I feel Rabindra Sangeet
has deserted me. The thought fills me with a sense of dejection,
because “the song that I came to sing remains unsung to this day ….”

The phone rang, interrupting my reverie. On the other end was my
friend, singer Zafar Billah from New Jersey. After the initial
exchange of niceties, he said: “Mahmud Dulu and a few of us are
staging a show for the Rabindrajayanti celebrations organised by the
Cultural Association of Bengal. We would like you to sing with us. Can
you?” The very thought of singing for Tagore’s birthday with friends
who share my love for his music filled me with joy. “Yes. Of course,”
was my definitive response.

Two weeks later, I was at the Rutgers University campus in New Jersey
with Sharmila Roy Pommot, Zafar, Dulu, Jhumur Chakrabarty, Malabika
Guha and other Tagore enthusiasts, singing “Praner manush ache
prane…”

“The man of my heart, my in-dwelling man

dwells in my heart of hearts

which is why I see him everywhere.”.

I realised how aptly the words expressed my deep relationship with the
poet. Of course, Tagore is and always will be in my heart. Some days I
am deluded into thinking that he has abandoned me since I search for
him in the material world, forgetting that he dwells deep within me.
Each time I feel that I have lost him, he makes his presence felt by
filling up the empty receptacle of my heart with new elixir of life.

Thank you, Gurudev, for making the finite journey of my life an
infinite experience!

The writer is a renowned Rabindra Sangeet exponent and a former
employee of the World Bank

Note: Most of the translations are by Rabindranath Tagore. A few have
been collected from other sources.

http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=186660

Int’l standard cycle track to be opened in Yerevan in early autumn

International standard cycle track to be opened in Yerevan in early autumn

May 21, 2011 – 14:38 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net –

Renco Italian company is working on construction of a cycle track in
Yerevan to be completed in August 2011.

The construction works worth AMD 5 billion 801 million 930 thous. were
launched in June 2010.

On May 21, Armenian President Serzh Sargyan visited the construction
site and was briefed on the works’ progress.

As Renco President Antonio Passeri stated, `the 250-meter cycle track
is built in accordance with international standards; tribune capacity
is 3200 seats. Construction materials were imported from Europe.’

Renco has been operating in Armenia for 10 years.

NKR Pres, RA Agriculture Min discuss ways to boost local production

NKR President, RA Agriculture Minister discuss ways to boost local production

May 21, 2011 – 12:05 AMT
PanARMENIAN.Net –

On May 21, President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan met with
the minister of agriculture of the Republic of Armenia Sergo
Karapetyan and his deputy Grisha Baghiyan.

Issues related to agriculture developement as well as cooperation of
the two Armenian states in this sector were discussed during the
meeting.

Special attention was given to the issues of introducing advanced
technologies in agriculture and stimulating local production.

Artsakh Republic minister of agriculture Armo Tsatouryan partook in
the meeting, Central Information Department at Artsakh President’s
Office reported.

Karabakh hosts play on ‘The Forty Days of Musa Dagh’

Karabakh hosts play on ‘The Forty Days of Musa Dagh’

15:50 – 21.05.11

President of the Artsakh (Karabakh) Republic Bako Sahakyan received a
group of cultural workers and actors from Armenia and US on Saturday.

According to a press release by the Karabakhi presidential
administration, the actors who will organize a literal-musical
performance on the motives of Franz Werfel’s `The Forty Days of Musa
Dagh’ novel in the capital city of Stepanakert.

Bako Sahakyan noted the importance of combining the efforts of
Armenia, Artsakh and the Diaspora for mass coverage of the
pan-national events, `which is among the pivotal directions of
patriotic education of the younger generation, as well as introducing
the history of the Armenian people to the international community’.

It was mutually underlined that such events should be organized
periodically in different hearths of Armenia, Artsakh and the
Diaspora.

Karabakhi Minister of Culture and Youth Affairs Narine Aghabalyan and
the head of the NKR Writers’ Union Vardan Hakobyan also attended the
meeting.

Tert.am

ISTANBUL: Education Min. makes surprise visit to Armenian foundation

Turkish education minister makes surprise visit to Armenian foundation

Sunday, May 22, 2011
VERCİHAN ZİFLİOÄ?LU
ISTANBUL – Daily News with wires

Å?irinoÄ?lu claimed there is underlying sympathy within the Armenian
community toward the ruling AKP for its role in passing new laws about
minority foundations.

Education Minister Nimet �ubukçu paid a surprise visit to the Surp
Pırgiç Armenian Hospital Foundation and held an exclusive meeting that
lasted for roughly half an hour with the foundation’s president Bedros
Å?irinoÄ?lu on Saturday afternoon.

Despite objections to such meetings from certain quarters within
Turkey’s Armenian community, Å?irinoÄ?lu claimed there is underlying
sympathy within the Armenian community toward the ruling AKP for its
role in passing new laws about minority foundations.

`All visits to the hospital are [normally] scheduled from many days
ahead, whereas Minister Ã?ubukçu’s visit was quite abrupt. Frankly that
was quite a surprise. We primarily spoke about the election process,’
Å?irinoÄ?lu, the foundation’s president and a businessman, told the
Hürriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

After the meeting, �ubukçu also spent some time with the occupants in
a retirement house that operates under the hospital foundation and
distributed flowers to them. The minister did not make any comments
regarding her conversation with Å?irinoÄ?lu.

`Turkey is undergoing a process of change. The Turkish people want to
know more about the peoples they are living together with. As of
course, there is also some curiosity within political parties, [and]
that is very favorable,’ said Å?irinoÄ?lu, who met with Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an on March 26 and told the Daily News at the time
that he was warm on the idea of running for a seat in Parliament.
Å?irinoÄ?lu, however, also said he was not going to declare himself a
parliamentary candidate unless the AKP made an official proposal to
him.

The Surp Pırgiç Armenian Hospital Foundation in Istanbul’s KazlıçeÅ?me
neighborhood is only second to the Armenian Patriarchate in terms of
its protocol status in Ankara. Political party leaders, however, have
paid frequent visits to Å?irinoÄ?lu over the past year, rather than
going to the Patriarchate itself.

These visits were quite natural, frank and sincere, said Å?irinoÄ?lu,
despite occasional objections arising from the Armenian community.

`I have difficulty understanding why [the Armenian community] reacts
[to these meetings.] If it were not me but some other foundation
president, these appointments would still have been granted.
Unfortunately, I end up having to give the same explanation to the
community on each occasion. Our protocol status in Ankara ranks in
second place after the Patriarchate. These visits, therefore, are paid
to the foundation president, and not to my person as such,’ said
Å?irinoÄ?lu.

New laws passed during the AKP’s rule have allowed the Armenian
community to reclaim their foundations through lawsuits in recent
years. These gains have created sympathy for the ruling AKP, according
to Å?irinoÄ?lu.

`It will be easier to maintain the community’s balance thanks to the
property we retrieved due to the changes enacted in laws pertaining to
foundations. All community institutions are kept through donations,’
said Å?irinoÄ?lu and also added they were holding cordial meetings with
the government in Ankara to retrieve the currently occupied area
across from the hospital.

Å?irinoÄ?lu further said they were hopeful about regaining the area and
that another fully equipped Armenian hospital was also in the works;
if such a hospital is opened, it will be the third in the Republic’s
history.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=turkish-armenians-sympathize-with-the-ruling-akp-says-foundation-president-2011-05-22

Russia Sabotaged Iran Nuclear Programme: Report

Russia Sabotaged Iran Nuclear Programme: Report

By AFP

May 20, 2011 “AFP” — -JERUSALEM (AFP) – Then Russian president
Vladimir Putin ordered the sabotage of Iran’s nuclear programme in
2006, according to WikiLeaks documents published by Israeli daily
Yediot Aharonot on Thursday.

The leaked documents, which were not immediately available on either
the Yediot or Wikileaks websites, purportedly detail talks between the
head of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission and then-US ambassador to
Israel Richard Jones.

During a February 2006 meeting, Gideon Frank told Jones “at length
about the results of his secret meetings with top figures in the
Russian security establishment and intelligence community,” Yediot
reported.

Among the officials he met were then defence minister Sergei Ivanov,
foreign minister Sergei Lavrov and the chairman of the Russian Atomic
Energy Commission, Sergei Kiriyenko.

He told Jones Putin had personally ordered measures to delay progress
at Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant. Under a 1995 deal, Russia agreed to
complete the plant and provide the fuel, with Iran committing to
return the spent fuel.

“Frank said that Kiriyenko had told him that he intended to delay the
process of sending the nuclear rods to the reactor in Bushehr for an
extended period of time and that he had no intention of supplying the
reactor with ‘fresh fuel’ at the current stage,” Yediot reported.

Kiriyenko told the Israelis “the Russians intended to explain the
deliberate delay by means of ‘technical problems,'” adding that “Putin
had personally ordered that deliberate delay in delivery,” the
newspaper said.

Frank also said the Russians had told him “they had made changes to
the hardware that they were supposed to send to the Bushehr reactor so
as to slow down the Iranian nuclear program even further.”

Russia, which has been a long-standing nuclear partner of Iran, voted
in favour of UN sanctions against the Islamic republic last June.

Israel and much of the international community fear that Iran’s
nuclear programme masks a push to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran
denies the charge, saying the programme is for civilian energy
purposes only.