Armenia needs political diversity – Hakob Avetisyan

Armenia needs political diversity – Hakob Avetisyan

13:58 * 15.03.15

Hakob Avetikyan, Editor of the Azg (Nation) daily, shared his opinion
of constitutional reforms in an interview with Tert.am.

As a member of a traditional Armenian political party, he is not for
party merger. According to him, it is an artificial process.

Mr Avetikyan proposes that Armenia adopt European standards because
Europe affords opportunities for both traditional and new parties.

With respect to the statements that the reason for party merger is
that such a high number of political parties is unacceptable in a
country like Armenia, Mr Avetikyan said:

“Yes, 63 political parties are said to be registered in Armenia. But
being registered is a different thing. We have more than 4,000
non-governmental organizations. But only a few of them are capable of
anything. As regards party merger, it is an artificial process. What
is the basis? Are parties expected to join one another and form new
parties? I cannot understand it.”

Asked about solutions, Mr Avetikyan said:

“A solution would be reducing the threshold for parties running for
Parliament from 7% for political alliances and 5% for political
parties down to 1%. But it may be irrelevant as well. In Israel, for
example, small political parties may be influential reforms or
formation of a new government -even if they have a couple of their
representatives. And two major parties may counterbalance each other.
This is one of the ways of forming a multiparty system in Armenia, but
not by means of artificial party merger. Merger round what? Numerous
parties with different names joined the Prosperous Armenia party (a
list compiled prior to the 2012 parliamentary elections – ed.) What
was the ideological basis of that alliance?”

Elaborating on constitutional reforms, Mr Avetikyan pointed out their
advisability.

“I have not examined the concept so I cannot say anything. But my
principled stand is as follows: when we say ‘Constitution’, it must be
honored at any cost.

“As regards the proportional representation and first-past-the-post
voting systems, I would support proportional representation if
Armenia’s political parties were real political parties. Most of them
are one-man parties or money-parties. Very few parties are of global
importance in Armenia, and they are idle if they have no money or
power. They face serious problems in political integration. Therefore,
proportional representation or first-past-the-post voting systems do
not matter.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2015/03/15/avetikian/1617367

Hovik Abrahamyan meets with Egyptian President

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
March 14 2015

Hovik Abrahamyan meets with Egyptian President

Prime Minister of Armenia Hovik Abrahamyan met with the president of
Egypt Abdel Fattah al-Sisi during his visit to Egypt, the press
service of the Armenian government reported.

The head of the Armenian government noted that Armenia attaches great
importance to developing relations with the Arab countries and that
Egypt plays a special role to it.
In turn, al-Sisi praised the role of the Armenian community in the
development of the country and noted that the Armenian Diaspora is a
good bridge for the expansion and deepening of Armenian-Egyptian
relations.

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/politics/67864.html

Hitler relied on the Armenian Genocide (in German)

RP ONLINE, Deutschland
11 mar 2015

Hitler berief sich auf Armenier-Genozid

Der Völkermörder fragte kurz vor Kriegsbeginn 1939: “Wer redet heute
noch von der Vernichtung der Armenier?” Von Rolf Helfert

1915/16 ließ die türkische Regierung anderthalb Millionen Armenier
töten. Der Orientalist und Theologe Johannes Lepsius (1858-1926)
publizierte mehrere Studien über diesen Völkermord. 1914 gründete er
die “Deutsch-Armenische Gesellschaft”. Rolf Hosfeld, der das Potsdamer
“Lepsiushaus” leitet, analysiert in seinem Buch die armenische
Katastrophe detailreich.

Auf Befehl Sultan Abdul Hamids II. wurden schon 1895/96 rund 100 000
Armenier niedergemetzelt. Türkische Soldaten wüteten mit orgiastischer
Brutalität. “Plötzlich brach eine unkontrollierte Raserei aus. Türen
wurden eingeschlagen, Mauern niedergerissen, Brände gelegt, die Männer
ermordet, die Frauen auf dem Markt zum Kauf angeboten”. Lepsius
schrieb 1915 in Konstantinopel: “Es ist unsagbar, was geschehen ist
und noch geschieht. Die vollkommene Ausrottung der Armenier ist das
Ziel”.

Der stete Niedergang des Osmanischen Imperiums entfesselte jene
tödliche Lawine. Ihrer europäischen Kolonien verlustig gegangen,
glaubten die Türken, dass sogar Konstantinopel bedroht sei. Am meisten
fürchtete der Sultan Russland, das er verdächtigte, die christlichen
Armenier zu unterstützen, die Schutz gegen Plünderer forderten und
größere Autonomie erstrebten. Abdul Hamid wollte das geschrumpfte
Reich festigen, Kleinasien “türkisieren”, wo etwa zwei Millionen
Armenier lebten. Dabei hatte Armenien schon lange vor der osmanischen
Eroberung existiert. Obwohl sie 66 Prozent der Wissenschaftler und
drei Viertel der Industriellen des Reiches stellten, galten Armenier
als “Feinde im eigenen Land”.

“Jungtürkische” Revolutionäre erniedrigten Abdul Hamid 1908 zur
Nebenfigur; seit 1913 regierten sie diktatorisch. Erneut verübten
türkische Truppen Massaker, denen zehntausende Armenier zum Opfer
fielen. Laut Hosfeld habe türkische “Paranoia” die Armeniermorde mit
verursacht. Während des Ersten Weltkriegs kämpfte das osmanische Reich
an der Seite Deutschlands. Ende 1914 erklärte Russland der Türkei den
Krieg, die zahlreiche Niederlagen erlitt, wodurch der Hass gegen
armenische Christen zunahm, die angeblich Russland begünstigten, dem
das östliche Armenien gehörte. Nun verlangten jungtürkische Politiker,
die “Endlösung der Armenierfrage” herbeizuführen. “Wir Türken müssen
die Armenier entweder ausrotten oder zur Auswanderung zwingen”.

Das Militär deportierte die armenische Bevölkerung 1915/16 in Wüsten,
abgelegene Gebirge, unversorgte Gefangenenlager, um sie zu vernichten.
Bereits auf den Märschen dorthin starben viele Armenier bei
systematisch organisierten Massakern. “Wie Holz trieben die Leichen
unzähliger ermordeter Armenier auf dem Euphrat”.

An diesem von oben gelenkten Genozid nahmen Kurden teil. Über
verwaiste armenische Kinder, deren Eltern liquidiert waren, schrieb
ein Deutscher: “Hier saßen sie, Kopf an Kopf, Knaben und Mädchen,
vertiert, verhungert, ohne die geringste menschliche Hilfe”. Die
deutsche Reichsleitung wusste alles, aber Kanzler Bethmann-Hollweg
dachte nicht daran, die verbündeten Türken zu kritisieren. 1918
flüchtete der ehemalige Innenminister Mehmet Talaat, der den
Völkermord gesteuert hatte, an Bord eines kaiserlichen U-Boots nach
Deutschland. In der Berliner Hardenbergstraße erschoss ihn 1921 ein
armenischer Student; die deutsche Justiz sprach den Attentäter frei.
Wer heute in der Türkei die Armenier-Massaker erwähnt, landet oft im
Gefängnis.

Hitler glaubte, dass die Mordtaten, die er plante, irgendwann der
Vergessenheit anheim fielen. “Wer redet heute noch von der Vernichtung
der Armenier?”, fragte er am 22. August 1939 auf dem Obersalzberg.
Dieses Buch macht das Schicksal der Armenier einer breiten
Öffentlichkeit bekannt.

http://www.rp-online.de/kultur/adolf-hitler-berief-sich-auf-armenier-genozid-aid-1.4933639

Berkeley Armenian Alumni (UCBAA): "Armenian Identity in a Changing W

US Official News
March 14, 2015 Saturday

UC Berkeley Armenian Alumni Association (UCBAA): “Armenian Identity in
a Changing World” – Dr. Levon Abrahamian

Berkeley University of California has issued the following news release:

UC Berkeley Armenian Alumni Association (UCBAA): “Armenian Identity in
a Changing World” – Dr. Levon Abrahamian

Social Event | March 15 | 2 p.m. | Vasbouragan Hall

Location: 51 Commonwealth Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94107

Sponsor: UC Berkeley Armenian Alumni Association (UCBAA)

Ô²Õ¡ÖÕ¥Õ¾Õ¶Õ¥Ö Cal Armenian Alumni, students, and friends!

The UCBAA invites you to a unique a talk on “Armenian Identity in a
Changing World” presented by Dr. Levon Abrahamian this Sunday at
2:00pm in San Francisco. Dr. Abrahamian is a visiting professor this
semester at Cal, where he is teaching a course entitled Modern
Discourse on Armenian Identity. We are fortunate to be able to welcome
him back to our community, after his first visiting professorship at
Cal back in 1997-98.

Dr. Abrahamian is an esteemed cultural anthropologist and the Director
of the Department of Contemporary Anthropological Studies at the
National Academy of Sciences of Armenia. He has written four books and
over 150 publications touching on Armenian anthropology and culture.

We hope that you will join for this engaging talk. Copies of Dr.
Abrahamian’s latest book, Armenian Identity in a Changing World (which
is sold out at most major bookstores) will also be available for
purchase during the wine and cheese reception after the event.

Target audience: Alumni

Armenia forces kill second Azerbaijan soldier this week: Baku

Agence France Presse
March 13, 2015 Friday 4:07 PM GMT

Armenia forces kill second Azerbaijan soldier this week: Baku

Baku, March 13 2015

Armenian troops have killed a second Azerbaijani soldier this week,
Baku said Friday, threatening a “severe” response to the latest
violence in a long-standing conflict over the disputed Nagorny
Karabakh region.

“On March 13, the Armenian armed forces violated the ceasefire. An
Azerbaijani soldier was shot dead” in the latest border clash between
the arch-foes, Azerbaijan’s defence ministry said in a statement.

“Azerbaijan’s counter-strike will be severe,” it added.

The incident comes after another soldier was killed in an attack on
Azerbaijani positions on Wednesday.

Baku and Yerevan have been locked in a dispute over Azerbaijan’s
Nagorny Karabakh region since a bloody war in the early 1990s.

Yerevan-backed ethnic Armenian separatists seized control of Karabakh
and another seven adjacent districts of Azerbaijan during the conflict
that left some 30,000 dead.

Despite years of negotiations, the two sides have not signed a final
peace deal, with Armenian-populated Karabakh still internationally
recognised as part of Azerbaijan.

Karabakh’s ethnic-Azeri community — which before the war made up
around 25 percent of the population — was entirely driven out.

Threatening a shaky 1994 truce, clashes between Azerbaijani and
Armenian forces intensified again in January following an
unprecedented spiral of violence last year.

At least 18 people from both sides were reported killed and as many
wounded this year in sporadic flare-ups on the Armenian-Azerbaijani
border, and along the Karabakh frontline.

Baku, whose military spending exceeds Armenia’s entire state budget,
has threatened to take back the territories by force if negotiations
fail to yield results.

Armenia, backed militarily by Russia, says it could crush any offensive.

ANKARA: Plot Concocted Over Dink Murder To Smear Hizmet Movement As

PLOT CONCOCTED OVER DINK MURDER TO SMEAR HIZMET MOVEMENT AS TERRORIST

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
March 13 2015

A new plan attempting to designate the Gulen movement — also known as
Hizmet — as a terrorist organization has been put into practice
following President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hinting that the movement
might be behind the murder of Turkish-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink
in 2007, several lawyers linked to the case have said.

The recent testimony of the hitman who killed Dink, Ogun Samast,
has reportedly been the first step to serve the intended goal by
Erdogan to smear the Hizmet movement.

Speaking with Today’s Zaman regarding the plot against Hizmet,
Huseyin Ataol, a lawyer representing a police chief over accusations
of negligence relating to the Dink murder, stressed that an obvious
attempt is underway to portray Hizmet as a terrorist organization.

“In order to designate a group as terrorist, an armed attack is a
prerequisite and the Dink murder will offer the missing link for those
who are engaged in the plot against Hizmet. Otherwise, their efforts
to convince the people that Hizmet is a terrorist group will yield
no result. They, along with the pro-government media, are trying to
absolve the real perpetrators,” Ataol noted.

The lawyer said the Dink murder has been chosen as one of many
incidents to defame Hizmet as a preparation to designate the movement
as an armed terrorist organization, which President Erdogan desires
and has allegedly instructed the judiciary.

The role of the pro-government media, such as the Sabah, AkÃ…~_am,
Yeni Ã…~^afak and Takvim dailies, in the plot against the movement
is considerable, as Erdogan’s spin-doctors have produced fabricated
reports on a daily basis to create the perception that the movement
has engaged in illegal acts.

In order to put the plan to eliminate Hizmet into action by creating a
connection with the killing of Dink, an application by Dink’s family
made in 2008 requesting an investigation into police chiefs who are
considered to have acted negligently in relation to the killing was
revived in 2014 to go after Hizmet.

Through the investigation, those police chiefs, Ramazan Akyurek and
Ali Fuat Yılmazer, along with several police officers who informed
the İstanbul Police Department and other related departments on the
possibility of the killing of Dink by an ultra-nationalist group,
as official correspondences and reports also confirmed, were put in
jail and chosen as scapegoats to create the required link to designate
Hizmet as a terrorist group.

However, as Akyurek, who was the head of the Trabzon Police
intelligence department at the time of killing, sent a note warning
both the National Police Department’s intelligence unit and the
National Police Department in 2006 that there was going to be an
attempted assassination of Dink, he was arrested on charges of
“causing death by negligence.”

However, Engin Dinc, who headed the intelligence unit in Trabzon at
the time of Dink’s murder and now serves as the head of the National
Police Department’s intelligence unit, has even been asked to testify
in order to reveal the chain of negligence that resulted in Dink’s
death. This double standard upset the Dink family as the lawyer
representing the family applied to the court to request Dinc to be
compelled to testify over the issue.

Akyurek, who passed on the information concerning a possible assault on
Dink to the required departments, is now in prison, but those police
chiefs who served in İstanbul and were informed of the possibility
of Dink’s murder failed to investigate the matter.

The two police chiefs, Akyurek and Yılmazer, who was former İstanbul
Police Department Intelligence Bureau chief, are accused of being
members of an armed terrorist organization, which may later be named
as Hizmet.

Seven years after the murder, Samast suddenly decided to testify
as a witness on Dec. 5, 2014, to Prosecutor Yusuf Hakkı Dogan. His
latest testimony differs from what he said in 2010. Most recently he
claimed that while at the house of Erhan Tuncel, an informant for the
Trabzon Police Department who was accused of initiating efforts to
have Dink murdered, he overheard a conversation between two people
talking about Akyurek and Yılmazer.

Samast said that when he asked Yasin Hayal — another suspect in
the case who was sentenced to life in prison for inciting Samast to
commit the murder — about the names he overheard, he was told that
Tuncel knew these people and that they were behind the plot to kill
Dink. The testimony contradicts Samast’s 2010 deposition that led to
his conviction. He had earlier claimed that he did not know Tuncel
and that Hayal was acting as a liaison with Tuncel.

Also, three police officials — Ercan Demir, Ozkan Mumcu and Muhittin
Zenit — said in their testimonies that Dinc was the highest authority
at the Trabzon Police Department’s intelligence unit. Demir said
during his testimony, “The authority to inform provincial police
departments about suspects or conduct operations against suspects
belonged to Engin [Dinc].”

After the country’s worst corruption scandal became public on Dec. 17,
2013, which implicated Erdogan who was prime minister at that time
and his family, Erdogan pointed to the Hizmet movement and accused
it of plotting against his government via the graft scandal —
a baseless accusation.

However, Erdogan vowed to carry out a witch-hunt against members
of Hizmet after the revelation of the graft scandal and mobilized
the government and judiciary against the movement on the basis of
fabricated evidence linking Hizmet with various political murders
and illegal acts of which, in fact, government-related cliques were
the real perpetrators.

Erdogan and pro-gov’t media main actors of plot against Hizmet

Pro-government media outlets, such as the Sabah daily, used Samast’s
testimony to report on an alleged link between Dink’s murder and
Hizmet.

Lawyer Ataol emphasized that the current political sphere is very
convenient, in the light of Erdogan’s and the government’s attempts
to portray Hizmet as a terrorist group, adding that “the Ergenekon
organization [an armed terrorist group according to Turkish law
under a court’s decision] and the government is in collaboration to
eliminate Hizmet by [linking the murder with it]. It is known that
Ergenekon has a key role in the killing. Portraying Hizmet as being
responsible for the murder will also contribute to absolve members
of Ergenekon of the accusations of bringing down the government. The
government and Ergenekon have reconciled with each other.”

Adnan Ã…~^eker, a lawyer representing Akyurek, also noted that his
client did what his position required in order to prevent Dink from
being assassinated by sending a warning to the heads of all provinces’
intelligence units, in line with tip-offs by intelligence agents, of
planned attacks on the country’s Armenian citizens, as well as on Dink.

“In the light of this information, no one can claim negligence by
Akyurek linked to Dink’s murder. Furthermore, despite Akyurek’s
warnings, neither a bodyguard nor any kind of protection was given
to Dink. Plus, Dink was invited by several high-ranking İstanbul
intelligence chiefs in İstanbul and warned not to write about the
threats against him. Akyurek’s entire warnings were ignored.

“Samast’s changed testimony is full of contradictions when compared
to his previous one. It is obvious that he was instructed [to do this]
and a text of the testimony was delivered to him to accuse these police
chiefs of being members of a terrorist organization, thus clearing
the way to declare the Hizmet movement as terrorist,” Ã…~^eker added.

He underlined that Erdogan is the main figure behind the plot against
Hizmet and went on to say: “The day after Akyurek was arrested, Erdogan
told a group of journalists that instead of negligence [by officials],
a deliberate attempt to murder Dink is in question. These words confirm
that Erdogan is the one who has orchestrated the investigation of the
killing. How can a prosecutor make an independent decision following
Erdogan’s comments aiming to manage the probe in accordance with
his view? Through the subordinated judiciary, Erdogan is targeting
persons or groups.”

http://www.todayszaman.com/national_plot-concocted-over-dink-murder-to-smear-hizmet-movement-as-terrorist_375208.html

Padua Hosts International Conference Dedicated To Armenian Genocide

PADUA HOSTS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE CENTENNIAL

20:40, 13 March, 2015

YEREVAN, 13 MARCH, ARMENPRESS. An international conference on “Armenian
Genocide: 1915-2015: 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide”
was held at the main hall of the University of Padua on 11-12 March.

As the Department of Press, Information and Public Relations of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia reports to
“Armenpress”, the conference was organized by the group studying
the Shoah and massacres and the Department of Political Sciences,
Law and International Studies at the University of Padua.

The event began with welcome speeches by Rector of the University
of Padua Giuseppe Zaccaria, Armenia’s Ambassador to Italy Sargis
Ghazaryan, Head of the Department of Political Sciences, Law and
International Studies Antonio Varsori and representative of Padua
Municipality for cultural affairs Flavio Rodechiero.

In his speech, Ambassador Ghazaryan mentioned that the events
commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide in
Armenia will be in four directions, including tribute to the victims
of the Armenian Genocide and canonization by the Armenian Apostolic
Church of the victims, the gratitude of the Armenian people to those
who helped the Armenians during the difficult days of the Genocide,
support to the international community’s efforts aimed at preventing
new genocides and the renaissance of the Armenians having survived
the genocide and having reestablished independence.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/797630/padua-hosts-international-conference-dedicated-to-armenian-genocide-centennial.html

Events Dedicated To Armenian Genocide To Be Held In Frames Of Golden

EVENTS DEDICATED TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE TO BE HELD IN FRAMES OF GOLDEN APRICOT FESTIVAL

15:17, 13 March, 2015

YEREVAN, MARCH 13, ARMENPRESS: The Golden Apricot Yerevan International
Film Festival this year is devoted to the centennial of the Armenian
Genocide and on that occasion the Festival will have special
programs. The annual Festival will be held on July 12-19 in 2015.

The Project Manager of the Golden Apricot Yerevan International
Film Festival Michael Stamboltsyan stated at the meeting with the
journalists on March 13 that a great attention will be paid to the
Genocide in the framework of the Film Festival.

http://armenpress.am/eng/news/797566/events-dedicated-to-armenian-genocide-to-be-held-in-frames-of-golden-apricot-festival.html

If Putin Is Dead, Who Called The Armenian President?

IF PUTIN IS DEAD, WHO CALLED THE ARMENIAN PRESIDENT?

EurasiaNet.org
March 13 2015

March 13, 2015 – 11:26am, by Giorgi Lomsadze

Reports about Vladimir Putin’s death might be slightly exaggerated,
but they have kept Internet-users entertained for two days now. Yet,
as journalists go chasing the vanished Russian president, perhaps
someone needs to talk to his Armenian counterpart, Serzh Sargsyan,
who insisted that he spoke to Putin over the phone just yesterday.

According to the Armenian president’s office, Putin told Sargsyan
he was planning to come visit Yerevan on April 24 for Armenia’s
commemoration of the 100th anniversary of the massive slaughter of
ethnic Armenians in Ottoman Turkey.

If the chat did take place, Sargsyan may be the last leader to have
spoken to Putin. A trip to Kazakhstan was canceled, as was a meeting
with a delegation from breakaway South Ossetia.

Armenia ranks as Russia’s main ally in the South Caucasus, so,
presumably, Sargsyan would know when he’s talking to Putin himself.

But how did Putin sound to the Armenian leader? For now, Sargsyan’s
office ain’t sayin’.

The chat, though, is likely to feed the fire of speculation since
Putin disappeared from public view after late last week. What began
as a “have you seen Putin?” whisper is turning into a wildly trending
“Putin died” phenomenon that some take seriously and others as a
total joke. Even an oracular website has been set up to let users
ask if Putin is dead or not.

Besieged by questions about the Kremlin chief’s health, Putin’s
irked spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has told reporters that they are
crazy. He insisted that his boss is up and kicking, and still delivers
a bone-crushing handshake.

But suspicions linger. It’s still remembered how, in Soviet times,
the Kremlin kept all hush-hush about leaders’ health, and how viewers
were not sure if Leonid Brezhnev was alive even when he waved his
hand to the Red Square crowds.

The Russian administration’s claim that Putin on March 13 met with the
chairperson of Russia’s Supreme Court, Vyacheslav Lebedev, failed to
dispel the rumors. No visual evidence or details, noted Ekho Moskvy
radio station.

Some media outlets, though, are taking a philosophical view of things..

In a sobering editorial, Russia’s Novaya Gazeta, a Kremlin-critic,
wrote that “Putin did not die. It is you who did if you think that
his death will make you free.”

The Russian gloating over the “dead” Putin is but a reverse of North
Korea lamenting Kim Jong-Il, the editorial said, and does nothing to
end a tradition of tyranny. “In both cases, serfs have one and the
same hope: that the new lord will be better than the last one.”

http://www.eurasianet.org/node/72506

Analyst: Armenia’s joining EEU does not hamper relations with the We

Analyst: Armenia’s joining EEU does not hamper relations with the West

16:54, 14.03.2015

YEREVAN. – Armenia’s recent accession to the Eurasian Economic Union
(EEU) does not interfere and has not interfered at all with the
country’s relations with the West, political scientist Levon Shirinyan
said at a press conference on Saturday.

In his words, Armenia can even become an intermediary between these two.

“What place can Armenia occupy in the EEU? We [, Armenia,] may choose
the optimal options for the recovery of industry. First of all, I mean
fundamental science, theoretical physics, chemistry, mathematics, and
engineering work,” Shirinyan stressed. “If we do that, we definitely
will have our place among the other three EEU countries [i.e. Russia,
Belarus, and Kazakhstan].”

Armenia News – NEWS.am