Génocide : capitulation face aux lobbies

Génocide : capitulation face aux lobbies

Jean-Pierre Chevènement, candidat MRC à l’élection présidentielle, a
estimé vendredi que le texte de loi réprimant la négation des
génocides, notamment arménien, voté par l’Assemblée nationale,
“portait la marque chez les partis” de la “capitulation face aux
lobbies”.

“Les lois mémorielles, qu’elles soient de repentance ou d’ingérence,
portent en elles-mêmes atteinte à la liberté d’expression,
c’est-à-dire à la République elle-même”, écrit le sénateur de Belfort
dans un communiqué.

Pour Jean-Pierre Chevènement, “le texte voté hier par l’Assemblée
nationale porte la marque chez les partis de la perte du sens de
l’intérêt national et de la capitulation face aux lobbies”.

L’Assemblée nationale a adopté jeudi une proposition de loi pénalisant
la contestation de tout génocide, dont celui des Arméniens en 1915
dans l’Empire ottoman, provoquant la colère du gouvernement turc, qui
a annoncé des représailles politiques et diplomatiques, et a rappelé
son ambassadeur à Paris.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2011/12/23/97001-20111223FILWWW00306-genocide-capitulation-face-aux-lobbies.php

Figaro: Erdogan accuse la France de génocide en Algérie

Le Figaro, France
23 dec 2011

Erdogan accuse la France de génocide en Algérie

Jérémy Maccaud

VIDÉO – Après le vote d’une proposition de loi pénalisant la
contestation du génocide arménien, le premier ministre turc estime que
Nicolas Sarkozy joue sur «la haine du musulman et du Turc» à des fins
électoralistes.

Le ton monte entre la France et la Turquie. Recep Tayyip Erdogan, le
premier ministre turc, a accusé vendredi la France d’avoir commis un
génocide en Algérie. L’accusation intervient au lendemain du vote par
l’Assemblée nationale d’une proposition de loi pénalisant la
contestation de tout génocide, dont celui des Arméniens en 1915 par
les Turcs. «On estime que 15% de la population algérienne a été
massacrée par les Français à partir de 1945. Il s’agit d’un génocide»,
a déclaré Erdogan lors d’une conférence, faisant référence aux
violences commises tout au long du processus d’indépendance de
l’Algérie entre 1945 et 1962.

Le premier ministre turc propose même au président de consulter son
père à ce sujet. «Si le président français ne sait pas qu’il y a eu un
génocide, il peut demander à son père, Pal Sarkozy, qui a été
légionnaire en Algérie dans les années 1940. Je suis sûr qu’il a
beaucoup de choses à dire à son fils sur les massacres commis par les
Français en Algérie», affirme-t-il. En réponse à ses accusations, le
père du président de la République a affirmé n’avoir «jamais été en
Algérie». Pal Sarkozy, à la Légion durant quatre mois, n’aurait, selon
ses dires, «jamais dépassé Marseille». Il a par ailleurs qualifié les
propos du premier ministre turc de «ridicules».

Désolé, cette vidéo n’est pas disponible sur votre mobile.

«Le président français Sarkozy a commencé à rechercher des gains
électoraux en utilisant la haine du musulman et du Turc», déplore
encore le chef du gouvernement turc, avant d’ajouter: «Ce vote qui a
eu lieu en France, une France où vivent environ cinq millions de
musulmans, a clairement montré à quel point le racisme, la
discrimination et l’islamophobie ont atteint des dimensions
dangereuses en France et en Europe».

Sarkozy demande le respect des «convictions» de chacun
Nicolas Sarkozy, en déplacement à Prague pour les funérailles de
l’ancien président tchèque Vaclav Havel, a réagi à ces accusations
moins d’une heure plus tard. «Je respecte les convictions de nos amis
turcs», a-t-il dit. Tout en avertissant la Turquie, «un grand pays,
une grande civilisation», qu’elle devait elle aussi respecter les
convictions de la France.

De son côté, le chef de la diplomatie française, Alain Juppé, a appelé
la Turquie à faire preuve de «sang froid» et de «retenue», tout en
regrettant des «déclarations sans doute excessives» de la part du
premier ministre turc. «Il y a beaucoup de raisons de maintenir entre
la France et la Turquie des relations de confiance et même d’amitié,
j’ose le mot», a exprimé le ministre des Affaires étrangères, tout en
concédant que la proposition de loi votée jeudi «n’était pas
opportune». «Essayons maintenant de reprendre des relations apaisées.
Ce sera difficile, j’en ai conscience, mais le temps fera son `uvre.»

L’ambassadeur turc a quitté la France

En votant jeudi une proposition de loi réprimant d’un an de prison et
d’une amende la contestation du génocide arménien de 1915-17, la
France a suscité une vive colère en Turquie, qui réfute le caractère
génocidaire des massacres survenus dans les dernières années de
l’empire ottoman. Peu avant les déclarations lapidaires du premier
ministre Erdogan, il avait été confirmé que l’ambassadeur de Turquie
avait quitté la France. L’ambassadeur Tahsin Burcuoglu «est rentré
pour consultations», a déclaré à l’Agence France Presse le
porte-parole de la représentation diplomatique à Paris, Engin
Solakoglu.

Ce départ de l’ambassadeur turc avait été annoncé en représailles par
le premier ministre turc Erdogan, juste après le vote de l’Assemblée
nationale. Ce dernier avait ajouté que «les exercices militaires
communs avec la France et toutes les activités militaires avec ce pays
avaient été annulés». Le chef du gouvernement turc avait expliqué
qu’il s’agissait là d’un premier train de sanctions contre la France,
alliée de la Turquie au sein de l’Otan, et que, «progressivement»,
d’autres mesures pourraient être mises en `uvre.

Désolé, cette vidéo n’est pas disponible sur votre mobile.

Le président turc demande à la France de quitter le groupe de Minsk
Dans la foulée, le président de la Turquie, Abdullah Gül, a pour sa
part prévenu que la France devrait se retirer du groupe de Minsk, créé
pour trouver une solution au conflit entre l’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan,
si elle adoptait définitivement une loi réprimant la contestation du
génocide arménien de 1915. «Si une telle proposition de loi prend
force de loi, ce que je n’espère pas, alors il faudra très
probablement que la France se retire immédiatement de tous ces travaux
de médiation car elle aura adopté une attitude qui manque clairement
d’impartialité et officialise sa partialité.»

Le Groupe de Minsk a été créé en 1992 par la Conférence sur la
sécurité et la coopération en Europe (CSCE, l’actuelle OSCE) afin
d’encourager la recherche d’une résolution pacifique et négociée entre
l’Arménie et l’Azerbaïdjan du conflit les opposant sur le Nagorny
Karabakh. Ce groupe, auquel participe la Turquie, est coprésidé par
les États-Unis, la France et la Russie.

L’Azerbaïdjan, allié de la Turquie, a par ailleurs aussi «condamné»
vendredi l’adoption la proposition de loi française, la jugeant
«inacceptable» et «non conforme» aux principes de la liberté
d’expression.

http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2011/12/23/01003-20111223ARTFIG00293-erdogan-accuse-la-france-de-genocide-en-algerie.php

Ceasefire violated for 185 times

Ceasefire violated for 185 times

yerkir.am
14:13 – 24.12.2011

The Karabakh-Azerbaijan antagonistic forces of the contact line have
violated the ceasefire regime for 185 times last week.

The vanguard forces of Azerbaijan have shot over 850 times from
different caliber armors.

Press department of NKR Defense army informs Yerkir.am that besides
the ceasefire violations, there have also been flies of drones in the
air. Despite this sort of activation from Azerbaijan, the Armenian
side did not answer back and have realized its military duty both on
the ground and in the air equally good.

Erdogan Counters French Law With Accusations of Colonial-Era Genocid

December 23, 2011

Turkey’s Leader Counters French Law With Accusations of Colonial-Era Genocide

By DAN BILEFSKY

ISTANBUL – In a deepening diplomatic rupture, Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey accused France on Friday of genocide against
Algerians in the period of French colonial rule, one day after France
made it a crime to deny the Armenian genocide by the Ottoman Turks.

`Approximately 15 percent of the population in Algeria have been
subjected to a massacre by the French starting from 1945,’ Mr. Erdogan
said of the French dominion, which ended in 1962. `This is genocide.’

Mr. Erdogan’s sharp remarks seemed to severely dent Turkey’s already
fraught talks on joining the European Union. But more immediately,
they underscored concerns both at home and abroad that Turkey’s
expansive new sense of self-confidence – buttressed by its emerging
role as a leader in the Middle East – might be tipping into arrogance,
threatening to alienate allies and foes at a critical time.

Turkey halted diplomatic consultations and military dealings with
France on Thursday after the lower house of the French Parliament
backed the bill, which would impose a fine of about $58,700 and a year
in jail for those who deny the genocide of up to 1.5 million Armenians
between 1915 and 1918. Turkish lawmakers also called on France to
investigate its own atrocities in Algeria.

Turkey faces a raft of foreign-policy challenges on its doorstep, any
one of which could derail its long-term goal of obtaining regional
power status. France, a powerful member of the European Union, has
played a leading role in thwarting Turkey’s efforts to join the group,
so the latest clash is likely to harden French attitudes even more.

An increasingly outsize national ego, analysts say, had already helped
to fray ties with Europe. With talks to join the union hopelessly
stalled, many of Turkey’s 79 million people have greeted the euro
crisis with barely concealed glee, saying Europe has rejected them
because they are Muslim.

Closer to home, three of the most volatile states in the world –
Syria, Iraq and Iran – are lined up along Turkey’s southern and
eastern borders. Syria is already in a state of civil war, and Iraq
seems to be flirting once again with sectarian strife and dissolution.
Throw in an alienated Kurdish minority combined with an Iran that
erupted in 2009 and is now struggling with economic sanctions and
inflation, and the possibilities of regional destabilization, mass
refugee flows and even war do not seem terribly remote.

Facing such threats, analysts and diplomats say, Turkey needs to
resist the temptation to gloat and swagger. Soli Ozel, professor of
international relations at Istanbul’s Kadir Has University, said that
European and American economic decline, coupled with the Arab Spring,
were magnifying Turkey’s sense of its own importance as it evolves
into the model of democracy for the Arab world.

`Turks are saying, `We are now on the rise, you are running out of
steam and we don’t have to take any nonsense from Westerners,” he
said. But he added, `There is a fine line between self-confidence and
hubris.’

Turkey and its charismatic prime minister, Mr. Erdogan, could be
forgiven for displaying some vanity. He has overhauled a country once
haunted by military coups into a regional democratic powerhouse. He is
so popular in the Arab world that there has been a surge in babies
named Tayyip.

While Turkey’s economy surges – growing by 8.2 percent in the third
quarter, second only to China – Europe is sputtering and Greece, a
longtime rival, has been flattened by the sovereign debt crisis. With
its new clout as a leader in a region long dominated by the United
States, Turkey has also been basking in its roles as the voice of
regional indignation against Syria and the chief critic of Israel.

Earlier this month a deputy prime minister boldly lectured Vice
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. that it was Turkey, and not the
struggling economies of the United States and Europe, that would win
the 21st century.

`The fast fish, not the big fish, eats the small fish,’ said the
official, Ali Babacan, who oversees the economy. Challenging his
host’s boastful tone, Mr. Biden reminded the audience that in a sea of
young sharks, the United States was still the whale.

Six years ago, Burak Turna, a Turkish writer, was mocked here as a
literary shock jock after he wrote a futuristic novel in which Turkish
commandos besiege Berlin, lay waste to Europe and take control of the
Continent. Now, he says, the same people who once dismissed him are
celebrating him. `There is a new air being pumped into the Turkish
consciousness,’ he said. But, he warned, `We shouldn’t be too brave or
overconfident.’

Indeed, for all of Turkey’s recent achievements, its aim of having
`zero problems’ with its neighbors has shown few successes.

Turkish officials tried in vain for months to persuade President
Bashar al-Assad of Syria to halt his violent crackdown against
civilians, before finally turning against him. Turkey has been unable
to resolve conflicts with Cyprus and Armenia. Its recent decision to
host a NATO radar installation has rankled Iran. Relations with Israel
collapsed after Israeli troops killed nine people aboard a Turkish
flotilla trying to break the blockade of Gaza.

In September, the limits of Turkey’s appeal as a political model were
laid bare when Mr. Erdogan told the Egyptian satellite channel Dream
TV that secularism was not the enemy of religion and that Egypt should
embrace a secular constitution. A spokesman for Egypt’s Muslim
Brotherhood, which won first-round parliamentary elections there, told
the Egyptian daily Al Ahram that Mr. Erdogan was interfering in
Egyptian affairs. (Mr. Erdogan’s aides said the term secularism had
been mistranslated as atheism.)

Nor were many Kosovar Albanians amused in August when Turkey’s
minister of education, Omer Dincer, asked his Kosovo counterpart to
alter offending paragraphs from history textbooks, which he said
insulted the Ottoman Turks. Local historians protested that Turkey was
trying to whitewash centuries of Ottoman subjugation.

The perils of standing in Turkey’s way became abundantly clear at the
United Nations during the annual General Assembly meeting of world
leaders this fall.

Mr. Erdogan was on the fourth floor of the General Assembly hall when
he learned that the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, whom he
ardently supports, was making his address demanding full United
Nations membership for Palestine. When Mr. Erdogan rushed to the
nearest entrance to take Turkey’s seat on the main floor, a security
guard refused to let him pass. When Mr. Erdogan pressed forward, a
loud scuffle erupted that was audible four flours below.

One Western diplomat noted that `the Turks were literally throwing
their weight around.’

Yet Turkey’s many defenders say the West cannot expect Turkey to play
regional leader and then criticize it when it flexes its muscles.
Moreover, they note, the country is entitled to defend its dignity.

At the summit meeting of the Group of 20 major economies in Cannes,
France, in November, cameras showed Mr. Erdogan suddenly kneeling down
when he noticed a sticker of the Turkish flag on the floor to mark the
position where he was supposed to stand for a group photo, near
President Obama.

He gently folded it and put it in his pocket.

Sebnem Arsu contributed reporting.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/world/europe/turkey-lashes-out-over-french-bill-about-genocide.html

Kurds touched upon Armenian Genocide in Turkey

Kurds touched upon Armenian Genocide in Turkey

Aysor.am
Saturday,December 24

`After the parliamentary elections in Turkey the number of the Kurds
is became bigger in the parliament. They have raised the issue of
Armenian Genocide for several times in the parliament, which is a kind
of incredible thing,’ said Artak Shakaryan today.

He said the Kurds use the fact of the Armenian Genocide to hit the
opposition and the authorities of Turkish Parliament.
`We have one more probably temporary companion in Turkish Parliament
in the person of the Kurds,’ he said.

A.Shakaryan also attached importance to one of the events that took
place in 2011at Diarbekir city of Turkey. The opening of St. Kirakos
church here was a great event and it was done by the help of the Kurds
and the Turkish authorities didn’t interfere.

ANCT Welcomed the Passage of French Bill

ANCT Welcomed the Passage of a Bill Criminalizing the Denial of the
Armenian Genocide

noyan tapan
2011-12-23 23:11:11 | | Press release

Toronto, Canada – The Armenian National Committee of Toronto (ANCT)
welcomed the passage of a bill criminalizing the denial of the
Armenian Genocide, and rendering it punishable with a year in jail and
a fine of 45,000 euros ($ 58,000). The bill was voted on the morning
of December 12, 2012 in the lower house of French parliament and is
now scheduled to come before the Senate early in the new year, where
if passed, will become part of French law.

France formally recognized the Armenian Genocide in 2001, though at
the time, there were no laws criminalizing its denial. France, as well
as many other European countries, already has laws banning the denial
of the Jewish Holocaust.

In the days leading up to the vote, the Turkish government threatened
its relationship with the French government, in an attempt to sway the
vote. Many French Members of Parliament spoke against these bullying
tactics, including the bill’s author, Valerie Boyer, who has
maintained that the bill is not aimed at any particular country, but
instead is based on European laws that reprimand genocide denial in
all forms.

“The statement issued by some of Turkey’s main political parties
claims the bill ‘denigrates Turkish history’; this is yet another
example of the Turkish government trying to force its own views not
only on the French government, but also the Canadian government, the
U.S government and other governments around the world,” said ANCT
Chairman Jack Tchakmakian. “We applaud the French government for
refusing to heed to Ankara’s attempts at bullying and blackmail.”

Soon after word of the bill being passed, Turkish Prime Minister Recep
Tayyip Erdogan followed through on many of the threats made, halting
bilateral political and economic contacts, suspending military
cooperation and recalling Ambassador Tahsin Burcuoglu.

Turkey has also argued that the bill passed in France encroaches on
freedom of expression however, the Turkish government has long been
reproached for its own questionable freedom of speech record,
including Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code, which makes it a
crime to “denigrate the Turkish Nation” and its government. Many
well-known Turkish authors, such as Orhan Pamuk, the late Hrant Dink
and most recently, Ragip Zarakolu, have all been charged under Article
301 for publicly speaking about the Armenian Genocide.

About ANCT

The Armenian National Committee of Toronto is a chapter of the
Armenian National Committee of Canada, grassroots organization that
was founded in 1965 to address the concerns of the Canadian Armenian
community of a broad range of issues.

BAKU: Position of Azerbaijan in NK conflict meets position of world

news.az, Azerbaijan
Dec 22 2011

‘Position of Azerbaijan in Karabakh conflict meets position of world community’
Fri 23 December 2011 10:18 GMT | 12:18 Local Time

The document of the US Congress on foreign assistance for 2012 for the
first time calls for assistance to conflict parties in relation to
Nagorno Karabakh.

The statement came from spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry
Elman Abdullayev.

`Azerbaijanis, who because refugees and displaced persons are the
direct victims of this conflict and victims of ethnic cleansing held
by the Armenian leadership against the Azerbaijani population’, he
said.

According to Abdullayev, it proves that the position of Azerbaijan in
the resolution of the Karabakh conflict meets the position of the
world community, here the US position.

On Wednesday the Senate and House of Representatives of the US
Congress approved a document on allocation of financial aid to foreign
states for 2012.

The aid to Armenia was set at $40m and to Azerbaijan at $16.6m as a
result. Meanwhile, the US lawmakers urged the sides for the peaceful
settlement of the conflict and urged the White house to parity in
provision of military assistance to the conflict parties-Armenia and
Azerbaijan’.

The amount allocated to the separatist regime of Nagorno Karabakh is
not fixed in the document. It was only noted that it will be provided
`on the levels, corresponding to previous years’.

The level of mutual expenses of the United States for assistance to
Nagorno Karabakh made about $2m.

Another part of the document speaks of the support to trust building measures.

Abdullayev noted that Azerbaijan’s stance in this issue has always
aimed to support such measures and establish intercommunity dialogue
between Azerbaijani and Armenian communities of the Nagorno Karabakh
region of Azerbaijan.

`The intercommunication dialogue is a natural component of the trust
building measures. However, the occupation of Azerbaijani lands and
presence of Armenian soldiers there make it impossible to carry out
any measures to raise trust in these areas’, he said. In fact it is
impossible to carry out trust building measures under pressure’.

The process cannot proceed without withdrawal of Armenian troops from
the occupied lands, Abdullayev said.

Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno Karabakh remains unsettled
for already 20 years. Mediation efforts of the Minsk Group co-chairs
are also ineffective.

Four resolutions of the UN Security Council on liberation of the
Karabakh region and adjacent areas are still not fulfilled by Armenia.

As a result, 20% of Azerbaijani lands are still under occupation by
the Armenian armed forces.

News.Az

BAKU: Ganira Pashayeva: `Azerbaijani Parliament must address French

APA, Azerbaijan
Dec 23 2011

Ganira Pashayeva: `Azerbaijani Parliament must address French Senate’

[ 23 Dec 2011 18:41 ]

Baku. Parvin Abbasov – APA. Member of the Azerbaijani Parliament
Ganira Pashayeva called the lawmakers to address the French Senate
before its voting on so-called `Armenian genocide’.

`We have to note that the decision of the French National Assembly has
negative effect on both French-Turkish and French-Azerbaijani
relations. It is serious blow on the France’s co-chairmanship in the
OSCE Minsk Group. If the Senate doesn’t reject this draft law, it will
cause next serious blow on the bilateral relations and French
politicians will have responsibility for it. We should note that if
the decision is approved by the Senate, France can not continue its
co-chairmanship in the Minsk Group because Azerbaijani society
entertains doubts about the France’s fair and unbiased role in the
solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict’.

BAKU: Azerbaijan disseminates sensational information about Gandzasa

Trend, Azerbaijan
Dec 23 2011

Azerbaijan disseminates sensational information about Gandzasar church

23 December 2011, 17:12 (GMT+04:00) Azerbaijan, Baku, Dec. 23 / Trend
M. Aliyev /

Azerbaijan disseminates the sensational information about the history
of Gandzasar church.

According to the historical documents, the Gandzasar church was
historically belonged to the ancient Albanians, Head of the political
studies and analysis department of the socio-political department of
the Presidential Administration Fuad Akhundov said.

The Armenians call the Gandzasar church as “Notre Dame”.

“Even the book by the famous Soviet scientist of Armenian descent
Joseph Orbeli, published in 1919, was withdrawn the same year, because
when the Armenians tried to appropriate Karabakh, the book proved that
the Gandzasar church belongs to the Albanian culture,” Akhundov said.

He said that the obtained information will be posted on the website

After gathering all the materials, they are planned to be published in
the form of a book in the future, Akhundov said.

www.erevangala500.com.

BAKU: Study of Erivan fortress’s history to benefit Armenian people

Trend, Azerbaijan
Dec 23 2011

Study of Erivan fortress’s history to benefit Armenian people

23 December 2011, 18:30 (GMT+04:00) Azerbaijan, Baku, Dec. 23 / Trend
M. Aliyev /

The study of the history of the Erivan fortress will benefit primarily
the Armenian people because Armenian people live in Yerevan today. I
distinguish the Armenians from the Armenian nationalists, Head of the
Caucasian Center at the Russian State Humanities University Ismail
Agakishiyev said today at a presentation of the historical and
analytical portal , dedicated to the 500th
anniversary of Erivan fortress.

He said that unfortunately, the materials which can not be represented
outside the Absheron Peninsula appear in Azerbaijan today. It would be
better if no efforts are made to this.

“Today, I distinguish Armenian fascism from the Armenian people, as
well as German fascism from the German people,” he said. “We can not
call Goethe as a fascist, but we call Hitler as a fascist.”
He said that perhaps, every person, including every Azerbaijani, has
the national feelings.

“The Azerbaijanis do not forget about their national feelings,” he
said. “They have been always able to have close relations with other
countries. Academician Likhachev said that nationalism is weakness of
the nation, rather than strength. “I am glad that such an event took
place today. One can often hear that the history is not the science.
One can inscribe anything, any lie in history. I tell these people
that one can write a false article, a false book and even a lot of
false books. But they will have no relation to the historical science,
because, whether we want or do not want, the history is formed on the
facts irrespective of our consciousness, emotions, power, interests.
These facts are objective.”

He said that the false articles are called as falsification in
historical science.
“Today, I appeal to publicists. Do not write these articles and know
that historical science, as oppose to other science, requires a lot of
energy and work. It is necessary to write a treatise on the basis of
the facts, rather than to make a mosaic. Not everyone can do this.
While studying at the Moscow State University, we Azerbaijani
students, saw how the defence of scientific work forced historian –
professor Farid Mammadov to overcome many obstacles and difficulties.
Unfortunately, there are these obstacles. They are very significant.
Why I came here today? I came here because much work was done today.
We see the website and the materials placed here.”

He said that many large and beautiful buildings are being built in
Moscow today. But none of them can replace Saint Basil’s Cathedral.

“Today, one can build a great building on the site of St. Basil’s
Cathedral,” he said. But how much money would have been spent, this
building will not be able to replace the cathedral, because it is a
spiritual value. Today, there are not only mosques in Baku, but
synagogues, churches. They are also our values. We consider them from
this point of view. Today, those who blew up the Erivan fortress,
destroyed the value of the Armenian people. But it showed that,
besides the Armenians, the representatives of other nations lived in
Erivan and had relations. The history is not only 1988, 1918 and 1905.
The history will have not only current but also future processes.
Let’s not stoop to the level of the nationalists. Much work was done.
This is the foundation of the universal project. I would really like
professional historians to do their best for broad masses of the
population to know about these historical facts.”

http://en.trend.az/news/politics/1973155.html
www.erevangala500.com