First Chance To Buy Brandy That Stalin Served Churchill

FIRST CHANCE TO BUY BRANDY THAT STALIN SERVED CHURCHILL

23 March 2012

Joseph Stalin and Winston Churchill at Yalta, where the prime minister
first tasted Stalin later sent him 400 bottles a year

Jonathan Prynn, Consumer Business Editor

Sir Winston Churchill’s favourite Armenian brandy – said to have
played a key role in the shaping of postwar Europe – has gone on sale
in Britain for the first time.

The prime minister developed a taste for the ArArAt brandy when it
was served by Stalin at the Yalta conference in February 1945. After
the Second World War, the Soviet leader arranged for Churchill to be
sent 400 bottles every year.

However, it was not available to the British public because the
Soviet government only allowed a small number of spirit brands, such
as Stolichnaya, to be exported. Most supplies of ArArAt were reserved
for the Communist Party elite.

Now, more than 20 years after the collapse of the Iron Curtain, East
European drinks distributor Vinorium has brought 10,000 bottles to
London, to be sold from Monday in the city’s specialist wine merchants,
such as

Gerry’s of Soho, priced at about £29. Vinorium’s Laszlow Puskas hopes
eventually to sell ArArAt throughout Britain and Ireland if it proves
a success. He said: “Everyone seems very surprised that it is finally
coming to the British market. Liquor shops told us they were getting
regular requests for it, but nobody knew where to get it.”

The company is also bringing other “lost” Eastern European spirit
brands to Britain, including Ruskova vodka.

The brandy, which was also a favourite of Agatha Christie and Frank
Sinatra, has been made in the Ararat Valley since 1887. The brand is
now owned by French drinks giant Pernot Ricard.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/uk/first-chance-to-buy-brandy-that-stalin-served-churchill-7582925.html

Prosperous Armenia Prospective Winner – European Friends Of Armenia

PROSPEROUS ARMENIA PROSPECTIVE WINNER – EUROPEAN FRIENDS OF ARMENIA

Tert.am
22.03.12

Today, European Friends of Armenia () publishes
the results of its poll titled “Poll: A Snapshot of Pre-Electoral
Armenia”. The poll was conducted by IPSC and EuFoA, with TNS opinion
providing extensive quality control and supervision.

The fieldwork was conducted between 29 February and 5 March 2012.

One of the questions was: “If the Parliamentary Elections were held
next Sunday, which party would you vote for?” The responses were
as follows:

Prosperous Armenia Party (41%) Republican Party of Armenia (37%) ARF
Dashnaktsutyun (5%) Armenian National Congress (5%) Rule of Law Party
(5%) Heritage Party (4%)

At the beginning of the campaign period, the two largest parties
score results without significant differences (error margin: 2.4%),
but far ahead of any other party. Meanwhile, four smaller parties
are all equally likely to pass the 5% threshold and move into the
National Assembly, or not. “It is stunning that at the beginning of
the campaign period, nobody can say if we will have a parliament made
up of 6, 5, 4, 3, or even just 2 parties! This also means that nobody
can today predict a specific outcome. The only thing we know is that
already today, a very large number of people is already certain to
vote.” comments Dr Michael Kambeck, EuFoA’s Secretary General.

Gagik Tsarukyan is the most popular party leader in Armenia, while
Serzh Sargsyan still has a strong lead when asking for Presidential
preferences. People across the country show dissatisfaction or
distrust in political institutions, and the “perceived” situation in
the country today is rather negative. However, the picture becomes more
positive when the respondents were asked about the real situation of
their own families, and when they evaluate the change of the general
situation in Armenia over the last 5 years.

EuFoA provides this poll as non-Armenian and therefore non-partisan
NGO. To ensure the highest level of independence and quality, this
poll has been entirely supervised by the renowned international
polling company TNS opinion. “We have assessed the methodology and
supervised all steps of this poll. I am happy to say that this poll
absolutely meets international standards and we were very satisfied
with the level of quality” says Dr Steve Schwarzer, Methodology and
Statistics Manager at TNS opinion, Brussels.

The poll involves 1,600 people in Armenia’s capital and regions.

www.EuFoA.org

Playing With Oligarchy

PLAYING WITH OLIGARCHY
JAMES HAKOBYAN

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 10:44:09 – 22/03/2012

A few days ago when the executive body of the Republican confirmed
the draft election list and the nominees of precincts, Member of
Parliament Ruben Hairapetyan, member of the Republican board, was not
among them. Hairapetyan had earlier announced in a press conference
that Serzh Sargsyan told him not to run in the elections.

Hairapetyan announced that the president had told him to deal with
football seriously [Hairapetyan is the president of the Armenian
Football Federation] to ensure our participation in World Cup 2014
in Brazil.

In the evening of March 21 Ruben Hairapetyan’s nomination became
known. Interestingly, when he announced that he would not run in
the elections because he will be busy dealing with football, he also
said that only his friend Samvel Alexanyan can tell him into running
for parliament.

Afterwards Alexanyan announced that he will persuade his friend
Hairapetyan because he does not want to be in parliament without him.

Apparently, he did, and Hairapetyan is now running for parliament.

How about the president’s task? Is Samvel Alexanyan’s word more
important for Ruben Hairapetyan than Serzh Sargsyan’s task? Or has the
task been cancelled? If Ruben Hairapetyan is running for parliament,
does it mean that he will not focus on the national team’s performance
or does he think that the national team will do well in the qualifiers
than Serzh Sargsyan can imagine?

At least, Hairapetyan’s case is really very interesting. After all,
it was a surprise that the government running almost all the oligarchs
and local strongmen for parliament in precincts under the majority
system make an exception for Hairapetyan, placing his name on the
party ticket.

However, one wonders whether the government is taking Hairapetyan to
parliament or Hairapetyan is the government and conveys to the public
that he will do whatever he wants, and he will change his decision
in any way. Or maybe Serzh Sargsyan wants to convey to the public,
and perhaps first of all to the criminal and oligarchic system that he
keeps the situation under control and can easily handle the oligarchs.

However, the fact is that the entire criminal oligarchy is headed
for parliament, on party lists or in precincts, which prompts that
Serzh Sargsyan is playing with the public and international partners.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments25539.html

Bribe Is Part Of "election" Ritual – Armenian Opposition Member

BRIBE IS PART OF “ELECTION” RITUAL – ARMENIAN OPPOSITION MEMBER

news.am
March 22, 2012 | 12:49

YEREVAN. – Armenia’s current system is formed by those in the
proportional election lists; they are the protectors of these systems,
opposition member-and former member of the Karabakh Committee-Ashot
Manucharyan said, during a press conference on Thursday, reflecting on
the political parties’ electoral lists for the upcoming parliamentary
elections. He also stressed that the outside world will play a very
big role in these elections.

In Manucharyan’s words, the sad thing is that the people agree
with this game; they deem unjust not the fact that the oligarch is
plundering, but rather why they are not oligarchs instead.

Commenting on the bribe being distributed in the lead-up to
the elections, Ashot Manucharyan noted that bribe is part of the
“election” ritual.

And speaking about the ways out, he stated that the newly-engaged
civil initiatives are the embryos of the new social order.

Ashot Manucharyan is convinced that the pseudo wise men are Armenia’s
first traitors; and the “rich man’s” entry to the tools of power
is the most extreme crime, and, consequently, execution by shooting
needs to be restored for that man.

Samvel Nikoyan: Parliament To Condemn Genocides Committed In Turkey

SAMVEL NIKOYAN: PARLIAMENT TO CONDEMN GENOCIDES COMMITTED IN TURKEY WITH DIGNITY

Panorama.am
22/03/2012

Heritage faction MPs have put on the agenda a draft of law on
“condemning genocide committed under Ottoman Empire against Pontic
Greeks, Assyrians and other nations”, which, according to local mass
media, has been withdrawn by the Parliament.

Panorama.am asked Parliament Speaker Samvel Nikoyan to remark on
the issue, who said that more prudent draft of law has been demanded
to develop.

“Condemnation of genocides is one of the issues deserving national
consensus. And Armenian Parliament, being the highest representative
body of a nation having survived genocide, cannot treat any decision
or draft of law condemning genocide negatively, particularly if it
concerns genocide supported by Ottoman Turkey and committed there. The
issue of condemning genocide never loses its timeliness as a preventive
measure to stop such crimes in the future, especially for Armenia,
especially when the civilized world decisively rejects the denial of
genocide in legal field,” said the Parliament Speaker.

Samvel Nikoyan has emphasized that the decision to be adopted should
be perfect, consistent and solid.

“Thus, regarding the draft of law put on agenda by the Heritage
faction, Armenian Parliament hasn’t withdrawn it, but has been
committed to pass a more prudent decision. Hailing the idea we must
restrain from emotional treatment. Hence, the draft of law remains
on our political agenda, and having greatly signified the issue,
we’ll again hold a discussion after it is drafted. I’m sure Armenian
Parliament will react with dignity to condemn a crime committed against
humanity, which Turkey, successor of Ottoman Empire, persistently
avoids to hold responsibility.”

Armenia To Benefit From Polish Government’s Assistance Program

ARMENIA TO BENEFIT FROM POLISH GOVERNMENT’S ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Tert.am
22.03.12

The Polish government has approved its 2012-15 assistance program
for developing countries, putting a special emphasis on former Soviet
republics, including Armenia.

According to the Georgian news website Aspny.ge, the program envisages
assistance for Georgia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine,
Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

Poland is planning to allocate financial resources to the above states
in an effort to promote democracy and respect for human rights.

Other countries listed in the assistance program are Burundi, Ethiopia,
Kenya, Rwanda, Somali, South Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Afghanistan,
Palestine, Tunisia and Libya.

Reponse Des Autorites Armeniennes Aux Mensonges Turco-Azeris

REPONSE DES AUTORITéS ARMéNIENNES AUX MENSONGES TURCO-AZéRIS
Jean Eckian

armenews.com
jeudi 22 mars 2012

La déclaration du Ministre arménien est un document dont tous les
Arméniens, en particulier ceux de France, des USA et d’ailleurs
devraient avoir connaissance et s’y référer.

Une idée répandue dans la diaspora parisienne est qu’il vaudrait
peut-être mieux, vis-a-vis des événements de Khodjalou, admettre
avoir abattu des civils. Cela pourrait mettre un terme aux accusations
de génocide qu’Azéris et Turcs brandissent avec de plus en plus
d’insistance devant l’opinion internationale.

A trois reprises, et avec effarement, devant des Arméniens, j’ai
du exprimer mon désaccord et protester de la totale innocence des
Arméniens dans cette sombre histoire. Lorsqu’on demande a Bakou
autre chose que des déclarations mettant en cause les forces armées
arméniennes dans les assassinats de civils, elle répond en produisant
des documents. Lorsqu’il s’avère que ces documents sont des faux
grossiers, la République d’Arménie le relève et produit des faits et
des arguments attestés par des documents vérifiables, c’est-a-dire
par des preuves * – que des Arméniens se mettent a admettre une
certaine responsabilité des Arméniens, c’est l’indication que la
propagande turco-azérie nous a atteints. Rien moins… A moins que
cela ne soit que notre version du “politiquement correct”, autrement
dit, de la critique systématique des autorités de l’Arménie et
de l’Artsakh.

Ce sont des dérives qui ne servent que les ennemis de notre cause
et il faut arrêter ca.

(*) Voir Khodjalou : Ã~Itablissement de l’indubitable Vérité /
Armenews 11 mars 2012 – ICI

Déclaration Faite le 3 mars 1997 par le Ministre des Affaires
Etrangères de la République d’Arménie

La déclaration des Azerbaïdjanais du 22 février 1997, relative a
ce qu’ils appellent les événements de Khodjalou, est la déclaration
la plus cynique et la plus perverse jamais faite par l’Azerbaïdjan.

L’Azerbaïdjan évoque effrontément un événement militaire de 1992,
au cours duquel, selon le Président d’Azerbaïdjan de l’époque,
Mutalibov, la responsabilité du massacre de la population en
majorité azérie de Khodjalou, près de la capitale Stépanakert
du Haut-Karabagh, incombe totalement au groupe azéri d’opposition,
le Front National Azerbaïdjanais.

Dans les jours qui ont suivi l’événement, le Président Mutalibov,
dans une entrevue avec la journaliste tchèque Dana Mazalova publiée
dans le numéro du 2 avril 1992 du quotidien russe Nisavisimaya Gazeta,
a déclaré que la milice du Front National Azerbaïdjanais avait
fait délibérément obstacle et interdit l’exode de la population
locale par les passages de montagne volontairement laissés ouverts
par les Arméniens du Karabagh, afin de permettre l’évacuation de
la population civile. (A ce propos, le rapport de septembre 1992
de l’organisation non gouvernementale internationale Helsinki Watch
cite une femme azerbaïdjanaise qui dit que les Arméniens avaient
notifié la population civile azerbaïdjanaise de quitter la ville
en brandissant un drapeau blanc). En fait, la milice azerbaïdjanaise
a tiré sur ceux qui tentaient de fuir.

L’espoir et l’intention de l’opposition azerbaïdjanaise étaient de
susciter des pertes civiles d’une telle ampleur qu’un soulèvement
populaire ait lieu contre le régime de Bakou, pour accéder au
pouvoir.

L’Azerbaïdjan ne s’en tient pas a une simple distorsion de
la vérité, accusant les Arméniens du massacre impitoyable
de la population civile de Khodjalou commis par l’opposition
azerbaïdjanaise du moment : il qualifie sans honte les tueries de
“clairement inhumaines et cruelles”, et de “massacres”. Ce faisant,
l’Azerbaïdjan recourt a des termes évoquant inévitablement chez les
Arméniens massacres et génocides de leur passé ancien et récent.

Ce n’est pas une simple coïncidence que l’Azerbaïdjan ait osé faire
cette déclaration a la date anniversaire de l’événement le plus
sanglant de l’histoire récente de l’Arménie. Le 28 février 1988,
tandis que le peuple du Haut-Karabagh manifestait par des moyens
pacifiques et constitutionnels pour la mise en application de leur
droit d’autodétermination, les autorités d’Azerbaïdjan organisaient
et armaient la foule, qui entreprit des pogroms contre les Arméniens
a Soumgaït, une ville d’Azerbaïdjan. Les massacres de Soumgaït ont
été suivis par les assassinats et des pillages en novembre 1988 a
Gianja et a Bakou en janvier 1990.

Au printemps 1991, les dirigeants du régime actuel d’Azerbaïdjan
eux-mêmes, avec le soutien de l’armée soviétique, ont organisé
le dépeuplement des régions arméniennes du nord de l’Artsakh, et
la déportation de la population arménienne du Haut-Karabagh et des
24 régions avoisinantes. Helsinki Watch, dans le rapport mentionné
ci-dessus, témoigne que “l’intention derrière ces événements
était d’exacerber la peur et l’horreur chez les Arméniens des
autres régions de l’Azerbaïdjan”, et parvenir a la déportation et
au nettoyage ethnique de plus de 600 000 Arméniens.

Ces atrocités ont été suivies par une séquence d’offensives et
d’opérations militaires azerbaïdjanaises a grande échelle destinées
a donner au conflit une solution militaire par l’annihilation de la
population du Haut-Karabagh.

De tels actes qui se sont produits au cours des dernières décennies
du vingtième siècle, ont fait écho au sort que le peuple du
Haut-Karabagh avait subi au cours des deux premières décennies de
ce siècle : les massacres et les pogroms de 1905 a Bakou, de 1918
et 1920 a Chouchi, au cours desquels la ville entière de Chouchi fut
brÔlée et sa population entière exterminée, sont encore vifs dans
les mémoires.

Par conséquent, cette déclaration ne peut pas être vue autrement
qu’une violation brutale et grossière des normes et principes du
droit international. Tout en promouvant un nationalisme agressif et
exclusif, l’Azerbaïdjan appelle et incite ouvertement a la haine
ethnique envers la population du Haut-Karabagh, avec laquelle il ne
cesse d’affirmer vouloir vivre paisiblement et harmonieusement. En
outre, l’Azerbaïdjan proclame qu’il est en son pouvoir de garantir la
sécurité et l’existence paisible du Haut-Karabagh, tout en favorisant
la méfiance et l’animosité en accusant faussement les Arméniens
et en déformant cyniquement son propre rôle et sa responsabilité
dans les événements récents.

Le Ministère des Affaires Etrangères de la République d’Arménie
réitère une fois de plus l’avertissement exprimé par le Président
de la République d’Arménie, Levon Ter Pétrossian, au cours du
sommet de Lisbonne de l’Organisation pour la Sécurité et pour la
Coopération en Europe, que si on impose au Haut-Karabagh l’autorité
azerbaïdjanaise, le peuple du Haut-Karabagh sera exposé a la menace
d’un génocide.

(Nations Unies A/52/85 – Assemblée Générale Distr. Générale

3 mars 1997

Original : Anglais

Assemblée Générale

Conseil de Sécurité

Cinquante Deuxième Session

Item 114 (b) de la liste préliminaire*

AFFAIRES DE DROITS DE L’HOMME : QUESTIONS RELATIVES AUX DROITS DE
L’HOMME, Y COMPRISES LES APPROCHES ALTERNATIVES POUR AMELIORER
LA JOUISSANCE EFFECTIVE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME ET DES LIBERTES
FONDAMENTALES *A/52/50

Lettre datée du 3 mars 1997 du chargé d’affaires par intérim de
la Mission Permanente d’Arménie auprès des Nations Unies, adressée
au Secrétaire Général.

J’ai l’honneur de vous remettre ci-joint le texte d’une déclaration
rédigé le 3 mars 1997 par le Ministre des Affaires Etrangères de
la République d’Arménie.

Je vous serais reconnaissant de bien vouloir diffuser la déclaration
comme un document de l’Assemblée Générale, sous l’item 114 (b)
de la liste préliminaire, et du Conseil de Sécurité.

(Signé) Movses ABELIAN Chargé d’Affaires)

ISTANBUL: US Senators Introduce ‘Armenian Genocide’ Resolution

US SENATORS INTRODUCE ‘ARMENIAN GENOCIDE’ RESOLUTION

Today’s Zaman
March 21 2012
Turkey

US Senators Robert Menendez and Mark Kirk officially introduced on
Monday a new resolution in the US Senate recognizing the mass killings
of Armenians in 1915 as genocide.

Senators Barbara Boxer, Michael Bennet, Dianne Feinstein, Carl Levin,
Joseph Lieberman, Jack Reed, and Sheldon Whitehouse also joined as
original cosponsors, a powerful Armenian lobby group Armenian Assembly
of America (AAA) said in a press statement on Tuesday. It said Senator
Charles Schumer, Chair of the Democratic Policy Committee, has also
agreed to cosponsor the bill.

“It is time for the United States to join the nineteen nations
including Belgium, Canada, France, Italy and the European Union that
have formally recognized the actions carried out by the Ottoman
Empire from 1915 to 1923 as genocide,” Menendez said, adding that
“the Armenian Genocide” is a historical fact and was one of the
incidents upon which the Genocide Convention was predicated.

“Only by accurately acknowledging the crimes of the past can we ever
hope to move forward in a legitimate manner and prevent such human
rights crimes from happening in the future,” he said.

In January, Turkey cancelled all economic, political and military
meetings with its NATO partner France after the French National
Assembly voted overwhelmingly in favor of a draft law outlawing
genocide denial.

Successive Turkish governments and the vast majority of Turks feel the
charge of genocide is an insult to their nation. Ankara argues that
there was heavy loss of life on both sides during fighting in the area.

A spokesman for Senator Kirk said 1915 events are well-documented
and formally recognized by 11 NATO allies and the European Union as
genocide. He added that this resolution accurately characterizes the
events of 1915-1923 as a genocide, honors the memory of the victims,
and strengthens America’s moral leadership on human rights and the
prevention of mass atrocities around the world.

AAA’s Executive Director Bryan Ardouny said “we commend Senator
Menendez and Senator Kirk for introducing this important human rights
legislation,” adding that his assembly also recognizes and appreciates
the support of those senators who joined as original cosponsors.

“We will continue our advocacy efforts to ensure additional cosponsors,
and urge its timely adoption,” Ardouny added.

The bill will first be sent to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
where Senator Menendez serves as a Subcommittee Chairman. The Committee
is chaired by Senator John Kerry, who has a long record in support
of US affirmation of the “Armenian Genocide,” the statement said.

In March in 2010, after the House Foreign Affairs Committee endorsed
the proposed resolution, Turkey, which sees the measure as a historical
affront, withdrew its ambassador from Washington.

US lawmakers then avoided a diplomatic clash with ally Turkey by
deciding not to take up the resolution. Supporters of the resolution
made a push for approval in the final days of Congress in late 2010,
despite opposition from the Obama administration. The measure was
opposed strongly by Turkey, and the administration feared it would
have damaged relations with the NATO ally.

A similar resolution that will most likely be introduced in the House
this year is unlikely to be passed after Republicans took control
of the chamber in 2011 because the new House speaker, John Boehner,
opposes it.

OSCE Says Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Deal Could Be Close

OSCE SAYS NAGORNO-KARABAKH PEACE DEAL COULD BE CLOSE

Vestnik Kavkaza
March 21 2012
Russia

Azerbaijan and Armenia are probably closer to settling the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict than they believe, US co-chair of the OSCE
Minsk Group Robert Bradtke said today, Trend reports.

The official noted that the Minsk Group helped them agree on basic
principles of settling the conflict, but their lack of trust and
cooperation hinder the process.

The Minsk Group will mark its 20th anniversary on March 24.

Anthropology Meets Food In ‘Armenian Cuisine’ Cookbook

ANTHROPOLOGY MEETS FOOD IN ‘ARMENIAN CUISINE’ COOKBOOK
Aline Kamakian

The Daily Star

March 21 2012
Lebanon

BEIRUT: Cooking is a form of storytelling according to the authors of
“Armenian Cuisine” – a vibrant, new cookbook that captures Armenian
cooking traditions and a slice of their history through home recipes
and personal accounts.

“As always the kitchen is the place where stories come out,”
says Barbara Drieskens, co-author of “Armenian Cuisine” and an
anthropologist who teamed up with the co-owner of the restaurant
Mayrig, Aline Kamakian, to help Kamakian achieve her dream of
publishing her mother’s recipes.

“Armenian Cuisine,” launched in December, is first and foremost a
cookbook – an introduction to the cuisine featuring more than 139
recipes, from basic to elaborate dishes. Kamakian, who is Lebanese
of Armenian origin, wanted to showcase Armenian food and show it as
its own cuisine originating from distinct circumstances.

“After having the restaurant [Mayrig] and hearing people say,
‘this food is not Armenian,’ I wanted to prove that it is definitely
Armenian,” she explains, seated at a table in her popular Beirut
restaurant.

The main components of Armenian cuisine are based on a few simple
ingredients or recipes, according to Kamakian, with pepper paste,
yogurt and nuts among the most important.

The pepper paste is “aromatized but not hot,” and each Armenian home
prepares its own version as well as its own yogurt which is combined
into many classic dishes, such as mante (baked meat dumplings) or
stuffed vegetables. Many dishes are also made from a combination of
fish, rice and nuts, with nuts as the basic element.

But Kamakian did not want to stop with just a description of Armenian
cuisine and needed help to accomplish her goals for the book.

“I’m a cook. I know how to cook but I don’t know how to write. … I
wanted [Barabara] to write this book. And her first reaction was
definitely no. A doctorate in anthropology and [a] cookbook? This
was too different. So when I started to explain to her what I saw
for this book and what I wanted people to know about Armenians, she
found a lot of anthropology in it – discovering Armenian culture and
writing about it through food.”

The first step for Drieskens was to get in the kitchen with Kamakian’s
mother to document her cooking – a task made difficult by having
her explain routines that had become second nature after years of
producing the same recipes.

“In the beginning I spent time with Aline’s mother in the kitchen,
just writing down the recipes and trying to follow the way she cooks.

You know the way a mother cooks – Aline told her, ‘you have to tell
her the measurements, you have to tell her how much,’ and then she
would be adding things saying, ‘so I put some water in,’ and I ask,
‘how much water?’ She says, ‘it’s already in it! You see it!’ Then
she’d say put four or five garlic cloves and you go count and there
are 12.”

Drieskens began to spend time in the kitchens of Kamakian’s aunts and
friends and soon learned that the ritual of cooking could lull people
into a frame of mind in which they felt comfortable sharing moving,
personal stories.

“It was also really touching to see how food is a form of consolation.

A woman would start to tell about the place she comes from, Urfa [a
city now situated in southeast Turkey], and she tells an incredibly
touching story about her mother. She cries, Aline cries, I almost cry
and then the woman starts to talk again about food … It’s a way of
talking about things that are otherwise difficult to speak about.”

These stories became a part of the book, adding a narrative from the
cooks who gave their recipes.

Kamakian and Drieskens eventually embarked on a literal, culinary
journey to eastern Turkey toward the end of the writing process, to
trace recipes back to where they originated. The trip was especially
emotional for Kamakian, who was visiting for the first time the
homeland her ancestors had fled long ago.

Together, the pair covered 2,800 km to source ingredients and recipes.

“We traveled through all these places and saw where the recipes come
from. You start to understand more and more why. Because in certain
places there is a lot of cheese, certain places produce honey, or
you have all these sheep. In Urfa I had a crisis: no more aubergine,
too much aubergine!” says Drieskens.

For Kamakian, finding the towns where various ingredients come from
is a part of the narrative connecting ancient Armenia and current
Armenian traditions.

“Sometimes people say show me your friends and I’ll tell you who you
are. I say, tell me what you’re eating and I’ll tell you who you are.

It’s history. I can tell you from what you’re eating, which region of
old Armenia your parents are from – from how you use the ingredients
to what kind of ingredients,” she says.

Kamakian sees this cookbook as her contribution to preserving the
traditions of those who preceded her.

“It’s my way of thanking each Armenian mother by keeping up their
recipes, keeping the tradition and keeping a sense of who you are.”

For more information or to purchase “Armenian Cuisine,” visit the
website:

Spicy sausages with lemon-tomato sauce

INGREDIENTS:

– 4 spicy sausages (soujouk)

– 1 tablespoon sunflower oil

– 6 tomatoes peeled and diced

– 1 tablespoon pepper paste

– 2 tablespoons lemon juice

INSTRUCTIONS:

Put the sausages in hot water for a minute to peel them easily. Make
a cut in the skin lengthwise and remove the skin. Cut in slices of
1 1/2 cm.

Fry the slices in sunflower oil for 2 to 3 minutes until they change
color. Add the tomatoes and stir-fry until they change color. Blend
in the pepper paste and the lemon juice.

Serve warm as mezze.

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/Culture/Lifestyle/2012/Mar-21/167429-anthropology-meets-food-in-armenian-cuisine-cookbook.ashx#axzz1pmkmoVvI
http://www.armenian-cuisine.com/index.htm