Le CICR Confirme La Liberation D’un Prisonnier Armenien D’Azerbaidja

LE CICR CONFIRME LA LIBERATION D’UN PRISONNIER ARMENIEN D’AZERBAIDJAN

ARMENIE

Le Comite international de la Croix-Rouge (CICR) a publie une
declaration sur le rapatriement du citoyen armenien qui a ete capture
par les Azerbaïdjanais.

La delegation du CICR en Azerbaïdjan a declare aux medias
azerbaïdjanais qu’un citoyen armenien qui avait ete capture par les
forces armees azerbaïdjanaises a ete renvoye en Armenie aujourd’hui
sous les auspices du Comite international de la Croix-Rouge (CICR).

La declaration affirme egalement que les delegues du CICR ont visite
l’homme avant son rapatriement afin d’evaluer les conditions dans
lesquelles il avait ete detenu et le traitement qu’il avait recu. Les
representants de l’organisation ont egalement ete en contact avec sa
famille en Armenie.

Rappelons que les medias azerbaïdjanais avaient diffuser l’information
que Mamikon Khojoyan etait un saboteur et etait arme lors d’un acte
de >. Plus tard, il est devenu evident que Khojoyan
77 ans resident de la region de Tavoush dans le village de Verin
Karmiraghbyur s’etait perdu.

mercredi 5 mars 2014, Stephane (c)armenews.com

Un Expert A Erevan Ne Voit Aucune Similitude Entre La Situation De L

UN EXPERT A EREVAN NE VOIT AUCUNE SIMILITUDE ENTRE LA SITUATION DE LA CRIMEE ET DU KARABAGH

ARMENIE

Les evenements qui se deroulent ces jours-ci dans la Republique
autonome de Crimee, qui fait partie de l’Ukraine, n’ont pas de
similitudes avec ce qui s’est passe dans le Haut-Karabagh, et c’est
pourquoi il est impossible d’etablir des parallèles entre ces deux
choses, a dit le directeur de l’Institut du Caucase base a Erevan
Alexander Iskandaryan.

" Armenia " Debat Sur " Le Haut Karabagh, Poudriere Aux Portes De L’

> DEBAT SUR invite le public a une table-ronde et debat
sur le thème mais egalement correspondant de la presse armenienne qui
suit et rapporte quotidiennement pour les Nouvelles d’Armenie Magazine
(armenews.com) les informations liees au conflit du Haut Karabagh. A
l’issue du debat, > invitera le public a terminer la
soiree autour du verre de l’amitie et des pâtisseries armeniennes.

Le bureau d’Armenie, au centre Krikor Amirzayan (president d’Armenia)

Il y a 20 ans, le 12 mai 1994 un cessez-le-feu etait signe au Haut
Karabagh, au terme des negociations organisees dans le cadre du Groupe
de Minsk, une instance creee en 1992 par l’OSCE et copresidee par la
France, la Russie et les Etats-Unis. Ce cessez-le-feu mettait un terme
precaire a un conflit qui fit entre 1988 et 1994 près de 30 000 morts
(7 000 Armeniens et 23 000 Azeris) et des centaines de milliers de
deplaces. Les Armeniens, victorieux de la guerre de liberation du joug
de l’Azerbaïdjan avaient le 2 septembre 1991 declare l’independance
de la Republique du Haut Karabagh. Une enclave offerte par Staline a
l’Azerbaïdjan en 1923 et peuplee a 90% par des Armeniens qui retourna
ainsi dans le camp armenien a l’issue du conflit sanglant. Mais
cette Republique d’une superficie de 11 500 km2 peuplee par 145
000 habitants. Avec l’eclatement de l’URSS, en 1991 l’Armenie et
l’Azerbaïdjan avaient declare leur independance. La Republique du Haut
Karabagh n’est toutefois pas reconnue par la communaute internationale
en vertu du principe d’> qui s’oppose
a l’autre principe, celui de >. Mais ce > aux portes
de l’Europe peut a tout moment redemarrer. Les forces armeniennes
et azeries surarmees se faisant face, parfois distantes de seulement
quelques dizaines de mètres. L’Azerbaïdjan dans sa course a l’armement
-suite aux mannes petrolières- est aujourd’hui l’un des pays les plus
armes de la planète. Face a cela, l’Armenie, n’est pas en reste.

Erevan qui a signe un accord de cooperation militaire de plus de
vingt-cinq ans avec la Russie qui beneficie du soutien implicite de
Moscou. Elle s’arme egalement afin de garder un equilibre. Un equilibre
qui reste neanmoins precaire. Le nombre de violations du cessez-le-feu
par l’Azerbaïdjan sont croissant chaque annee et arrachent quelques
vies de soldats dans chaque camp.

, vendredi 7 mars a 20h30, salle Cheneviers, MJC Jean
Moulin (20 avenue Jean Moulin a Bourg-Lès-Valence). Entree libre.

Contact : >, 130 rue Marcel Paul (Bourg-Lès-Valence). Tel
04 75 83 80 58

mercredi 5 mars 2014, Stephane (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=97830

Confessions Of A Former White Guy

CONFESSIONS OF A FORMER WHITE GUY

The Moderate Voice
March 3 2014

It came to my attention recently that I’m no longer white.

by RICK BAYAN

Don’t get me wrong: I’m still a certifiable Caucasian. My ancient
Armenian ancestors hailed from the high plateau below the mountain
range that lent its name to the so-called white race. I’m more a child
of the Caucasus than your average Dane or Irishman. But it seems that
history and politics have exiled me from the realm of whiteness. Let
me explain.

After 9/11, I began to notice that “Middle Eastern” had become a
separate racial designation on application forms – along with the
customary “white,” “black,” “Asian,” “Pacific Islander,” “Native
American,” “Hispanic” and “other.” Apparently I had lived half a
century under a grievous misconception: that “Caucasian” was synonymous
with “white.”

It was a natural mistake. After all, vintage comedian Danny Thomas
was a Middle Easterner like me. With that majestic honker of his,
he could have passed for one of my uncles. And most of us still would
have regarded him as white.

But the controversy came to a head this past Christmas, when
conservative pundit Megyn Kelly had the audacity to proclaim that
Jesus was white. In the firestorm that followed, it became manifestly
clear that the Son of God was to be regarded as a person of color –
along with Omar Sharif, Andre Agassi, Sandy Koufax, Tiny Tim, William
Saroyan and everyone else of Middle Eastern origin.

That bit of news sealed it for me: the writing was on the wall, and
I had no choice but to bid farewell to whiteness. No matter that the
title role in the latest Jesus movie went to a man who looks like a J.

Crew model. Jesus was now a former white guy, and by extension,
so was I.

I should have known all along. I was always the darkest denizen of
my grade-school class, even though I never felt slighted on account
of my swarthy complexion. Still, I used to notice that the ideal
American kid – especially as portrayed in Walt Disney films of the
pre-diversity era – was almost always blue-eyed and freckle-faced.

That wasn’t me up there on the screen. Plunk me down in a desert for
a week, and I’d be as brown as any Bedouin.

Another former white guy of Middle Eastern parentage: the late
Danny Thomas

I have to confess that part of me is relieved to be a person of color.

After all, white people have been taking it on the chin ever
since the Civil Rights era. I’m grateful that I no longer have to
shoulder the blame for slavery, Jim Crow, systematic oppression,
colonial imperialism, hegemonic dominance and whatever else they’ve
been teaching about white people (and especially white Christian
heterosexual males) in today’s academic Grievance Studies departments.

Living under such opprobrium can weary the soul.

In fact, now that I’m nonwhite, I can start railing against “white
privilege” – that most diabolically ingenious of grievances. You
see, white people can’t do anything about the fact that they’re
white. It’s a designation that will haunt them for life and render
them helpless fodder for all manner of race-based accusations. We can
wag our fingers at them and they’re not allowed to wag back. In short,
we have them trapped.

As a former white guy, I can safely raise the spectre of “white
privilege” whenever I’m rejected by a publisher or snubbed by the
membership committee of the local country club. I can seethe inwardly
whenever I think about white investment bankers making deals with
white politicians (as we all should).

But as a former white person and a student of history, I also know
that white people aren’t some unified, monolithic juggernaut. Just
look at the record: these folks have been fighting one another for
centuries. The Hundred Years’ War… the War of the Roses… the War
of Jenkins’ Ear… even World War I – these were whites-only conflicts,
declared by white alpha males upon other white alpha males, and fought
almost entirely by lower-ranking white males who willingly gave their
lives to oblige their masters.

Foreground: Specimen of a Caucasian who is also certifiably white.

Background: A certifiably white polar bear for comparison.

It becomes apparent, if you do a little cursory research, that white
people are divided into dozens of distinct nationalities – not all of
whom have enjoyed special privileges in the past or present. I mean,
can I really point to Romanians and Bulgarians as the authors of
my systematic oppression? No? How about Serbs, Hungarians, Czechs,
Poles, Latvians, Finns and Norwegians? If they’re off the hook,
who do I blame?

I suppose I can always aim a self-righteous barb at the WASPs, whose
British ancestors were – along with the Spanish conquistadors — North
America’s first illegal immigrants. After all, those WASPs swiped a
continent from its original inhabitants, introduced slavery to these
shores and dominated American life until the Irish, Italians, Jews,
Asians and other upstart groups forced them to share the glory. The
fact that they also gave us George Washington, Ben Franklin, Abraham
Lincoln, Mark Twain, Susan B. Anthony and Elvis Presley is almost
irrelevant.

But which WASPs should I blame? The farmers and townspeople of New
England? No, they may have been starchy and antagonistic to the
notion of pleasure, but they were, on the whole, sturdy and virtuous
folk. Do I blame the good Quakers of Pennsylvania or the enterprising
Knickerbocker merchants of old New York? No again; they did little
or nothing to oppress me and my kind; in fact, they were generally
liberal in their attitude toward minorities and newcomers.

Well, then, how about the Southerners who profited from the
back-breaking servitude of enslaved Africans? Now I’m ready to pounce.

But the problem here is twofold: first, only a tiny fraction of
Southerners ever owned slaves. Second (and probably even more
important), every last one of those slave-owners is DEAD. Not only
dead, but currently crumbling to dust in their graves.

I don’t know about you, but I generally have a hard time blaming
crumbling skeletons for ruining my life. And because I don’t endorse
the Old Testament concept of collective guilt, you won’t find me
castigating today’s white folks for the sins of their great-great-great
grandfathers. This former white guy will always judge individuals as
individuals. It might be a better world if we all did.

Rick Bayan is founder-editor of The New Moderate.

(The+Moderate+Voice)

http://themoderatevoice.com/192194/confessions-of-a-former-white-guy/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+themoderatevoice+

A Genocide Gone Unpunished

A GENOCIDE GONE UNPUNISHED

Pogroms of Armenians in Sumgait (February 1988)

As it happened

“No half-measures or arguments about friendship of nations can calm
down the people. Even if some doubted it before Simgait, no one
sees a moral opportunity to insist on territorial unity of NKAO and
Azerbaijan after the tragedy happened”.

Andrei Sakharov, renown Soviet physicist and human rights activist

Pogroms, beatings and murder of Armenians in Sumgait, which is a town
30-minutes drive from Baku, took place in broad daylight as passersby
kept looking. The crimes committed by Azeri thugs reached their high
point on February 27-28. These events were proceeded by a wave of
anti-Armenian rallies that shook entire Azerbaijan in February 1988.

Almost the entire territory of the city with a population of
250,000 became an arena for unobstructed mass pogroms of its Armenian
population. Azeri thugs broke into apartment buildings with prepared in
advance lists of Armenian tenants residing there. Azeries were armed
with iron rods (armature pieces), hatchets, knives, broken bottles,
rocks and gas tanks. The number of these thugs can be determined by a
simple fact that according to many witnesses, 50-80 people attacked
each apartment. Similar crowds (numbering up to one hundred people
each) went on a rampage in the streets.

Dozens of Armenian were killed (according to verified but
incomprehensive data, number of murdered Armenians reached at least
53), majority of whom were set afire alive after being beaten and
tortured. Hundreds of innocent people recieved injuries of different
severity and became physically impaired. Women, among them minors,
were raped. More than two hundred apartments were robbed, dozens of
cars were destroyed and burned, dozens of art and crafts studious,
shops and kiosks were demolished. Thousands of people became refugees.

At best Azeries kept silence, some, calling themselves the
intelligencia or the “salt” of Azeri nation, tried to justify what
happened. These were Sumgait’s true colors, which put the first mark
on the long list of crimes against humanity committed by Azerbaijani
authorities during the past decade.

Pogroms of Armenians in Sumgait amounted to genocide organized on
the governmental level. In his address to the Supreme Council of the
Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Region, a leader of the Communist Party
of Azerbaijan Mr. Hidayat Orujev, stated days before the massacre
of Armenians in Sumgait: “If you do not stop campaigning for the
unification of Nagorno Karabakh with Armenia, if you don’t sober up,
100,000 Azeris from neighboring districts will break into your houses,
torch your apartments, rape your women, and kill your children.” The
same Orujev is currently the State Advisor for Ethnic Policy in Heidar
Aliyev’s presidential staff.

This crime was not given its adequate political and legal evaluation.

Not only its organizers and primary executors were set free, but also
until today their names remained unknown to the world. Despite the
fact that everything possible was done to conceal the circumstances
of the crime committed in Sumgait and to distort its nature, there
are enough documents, witness accounts and other facts that lead to
one and only conclusion: the pogroms were organized and executed on
high governmental level. Moreover, prime organizers and executors of
the crime were the authorities of then Soviet Azerbaijan and certain
nationalistic pro-Turkish Mafia circles linked in different ways to
Azerbaijani authorities.

During 18 October-18 November 1988, the Supreme Court of the USSR
reviewed one of the eighteen criminal cases filed after the Sumgait
atrocities, in which, as the prosecution stated in its conclusion,
“hundreds of people of Azeri nationality” participated. During the
investigation many witnesses were questioned, the testimony of which
stated the unusual cruelty and their organized nature of the crimes.

Enraged mobs threw furniture, refrigerators, television sets and beds
out of balconies and set them afire. Tenants were dragged from their
apartments. If they tried to run and escape, the mob attacked them.

The mob used metal rods, knives and hatchets, after which bodies were
thrown into the fire. “He was still moving, trying to escape from
fire, but five young men were pushing him back into the fire with
metal rods” (witness A. Arkhipov). The Internal Ministry troops did
nothing. Witness S. Guliyev revealed during the trial how they reacted
to pogroms and killings: “A man was being beaten near the windows of
a police station. The police gave up the town to dishevel. It was
not [present] in town. I did not see it [there].” “The Police knew
everything”, — stated witness D. Zarbaliyev, a son of an Internal
Ministry major himself.

Division of one organized crime into separate and independent cases
testified to the fact that the trial was biased and had an aim to
conceal true organizers and perpetrators of the crime. The court
qualified mass murders of Armenians as murders committed by hooligans.

Moreover, during the trial, the criminal idleness of local party
and soviet structures as well as the military regiments present in
the city was not taken into consideration. By February 29 the army
troops were in Sumgait. However, they were not defending Armenians,
but rather defending themselves from the enraged mob, which was
throwing rocks at the army troops.

Mass rallies, which gathered thousands and where direct calls to kill
Armenians and begin with pogroms were made, also allow concluding that
tragic events in Sumgait were organized. So does the obvious assistance
of Sumgait law enforcement bodies to the mobsters and murderers, and
later the involvement of officers of the Azerbaijani Interior Ministry
and the KGB in the sabotage of criminal investigations and covering of
criminals. The weapons of murder (sharpened armature pieces, spears and
knives) were manufactured at Sumgait factories, rocks were delivered
to the areas of pogroms in advance, roadblocks were installed on the
escape routes from the town, lists of Armenian residents were given
to the mobsters, telephones were disconnected by the workers of the
local telephone company, electricity was shut off in entire blocks and
neighborhoods of the town during the days that the pogroms took place,
the mobs were well disciplined and subordinated hierarchically to one
another. All of these contradict to the allegations that the crime
had a spontaneous nature. It should be noted that immediately after
the pogroms, following the orders of the Chairman of the Cabinet of
Ministers (Prime Minister) of Azerbaijani SSR G. N. Seidov and an
Azerbaijani Communist Party’s Central Committee official Ganafayev,
the belongings of Armenians, which were thrown out of their apartments
to the streets, were hastily removed, yards and building entrenches
were wash, and mobbed apartments and public buildings were frantically
repaired. Seidov headed the government delegation that arrived to
Sumgait on March 1, 1988. Thus, the physical evidence of the crimes
was destroyed, which noticeably hampered the investigation. The bodies
of many victims were later found in the morgues of Baku and other
towns near Sumgait. During the May 21, 1988 plenum of the Central
Committee of the Azerbaijani Communist Party, the former Secretary
of Sumgait Committee of Communist Party D. M. Muslim-Zadeh blamed
the authorities of Azerbaijan for the Sumgait tragedy.

The policy of silence around the genocide committed in Sumgait as well
as the permissive attitude of the international community towards the
Azeri perpetrators of the Sumgait genocide allowed the organizers and
active participants of pogroms to avoid criminal punishment. Thus, the
bloody campaign continued and soon embraced the entire territory of
Azerbaijani SSR, reaching its high point in January of 1990 in Baku,
when hundreds of Armenians fell victim to the pathological hatred of
Azeri nationalists. In May, 1988 the Shushi regional Communist Party
Committee initiated deportations of Armenians from Shushi. In September
1988, tragic events took place near Kojalu village (Nagorno Karabakh),
where several Armenians were wounded and killed and the last Armenian
residents were expelled from Shushi. In November-December of the same
year, Azerbaijan was swept with a wave of Armenian pogroms. The most
brutal of them tool place in Baku, Kirovabad (Gyanja), Shemakha,
Shamkhor, Mingechaur and Nakhichevan Soviet Autonomous Republic of
Azerbaijan. In Kirovabad, for example, Azeri mobsters burst into a
retirement living community, took its residents away to the outskirts
of the city and brutally murdered twelve old men and women, of which
some were disabled.

The Sumgait tragedy and its bloody repetitions in Azerbaijan in
1988-1991, led to the disappearance of a 450,000-strong Armenian
community of Azerbaijan and the military aggression against the
Armenians of Nagorno Karabakh in 1992-1994. Although this has been
commonly perceived as the main and only reason for pogroms, the roots
of this tragedy are to be found not only in the unique mentality of
the Azeris as a people, which, allegedly, could not do otherwise but
to answer with pogroms and murders to Karabakh Armenian’s peaceful
demands for self-determination. Certainly, psychological and historic
motives, which determined the social climate in Azerbaijan, are very
important in order to understand why all of a sudden thousands of
people grabbed hatchets and started killing their harmless neighbors.

Certain social climate, which would trigger a psychosis of murder,
had to exist in order for an explosion of aggression and violence of
this magnitude to occur. Recollections of a famous French writer of
Azeri descent Um-al-Banin, who spent her childhood in Baku is a good
illustration of this. Her writings demonstrate how an atmosphere of
massacres (pogroms of Armenians in 1905-1906) can affect a child’s
mind. This is how she describes the games of Baku children in her book
entitled “Caucasian Days”: “On holidays we used to played a game called
“Armenian Massacres”, which we preferred of all others. Drunk with our
racist passion, we would sacrifice Tamar (whose mother was Armenian)
on the altar of our atavistic hatred.

First we would arbitrarily accuse her of killings of Muslims and then
immediately shoot her several times over and over in order to renew our
pleasure. Then we would tear off her limbs, tongue, head and innards
and threw it to the dogs to show our disdain for Armenian flesh.” In
this environment several generation grew up – fathers and grandfathers
of people who live today. It was then that the foundation for mutual
hatred, which would burst into flames during the times of change in
1918-1920 and in 1988-1991, was cemented. But the serious reason, which
led to the massacres, continued to exist. They were implicit but real.

Beginning from creation of Azerbaijani state in 1918, genocide was and
still remains a tool in the arsenal of Azerbaijani politicians. The
organizers of the Armenian genocide in Azerbaijan (1920-1991) were
certainly inspired by the results of Turkey’s anti-Armenian policy –
a country, in which more than one and a half Armenians were killed by
local nationalists as a result of an unpunished genocide of 1915-1923.

Today, just as ten years ago, it is obvious that the architects of the
Azerbaijani state were concerned the least with the issue of ensuring
prosperity for its national minorities. Instead they continued their
policy of Turkization in all aspects of the state. This can be seen
in the numerous public statements of top Azerbaijani state officials,
including those of President Heydar Aliyev. Denial of the guilt of
Azeries and Turks in the organization and execution of the Armenian
genocide, shifting the blame to Armenians themselves, the policy
of steeling the cultural heritage created by Armenians during many
centuries in their homeland and territorial claims on a large part
of Armenian historic lands put in doubt the possibility, which is
expressed in the West, of co-existence of Azeri Turks and Armenians
in the same state in the foreseeable future.

1334 G Street, Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005 tel: (202) 223-4330,
fax (202) 223-4332, e-mail: [email protected]

Internet Replacing Traditional Communications In Armenia – Study

INTERNET REPLACING TRADITIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN ARMENIA – STUDY

15:00 * 04.03.14

Traditional services of communication are stepping back in Armenia
little by little to give way to the internet, according to Haykaz
Fanyan, an advisor of Ameria Group.

“Beeline is the leader on the internet accessibility market; we
have also studied the most frequent activities on the internet. They
are the visits to the social networking sites and the video calls,”
he told a news conference on Tuesday.

The expert said that the company conducted a survey among 200,000
people to obtain a statistics on the demand for cable and TV systems’
services and use, mobile communication, internet access and landline
telephones.

The company’s director, Tigran Jrbashyan, said he finds the studies
a good opportunity to evaluate the situation on the market and reveal
the main competitors, as well as develop appropriate strategies.

“It also has a certain business objective, so we can say today that
the culture is already developing,” he said, adding that the full
package of studies costs 1,200,000 Armenian Drams (approx. $30,000).

Armenian News – Tert.am

How Russia Changed State Of Things In Turkey’s Favor

HOW RUSSIA CHANGED STATE OF THINGS IN TURKEY’S FAVOR

Igor Muradyan, Political Analyst
Comments – Tuesday, 04 March 2014, 15:55

Despite the artificial upheaval of the Russian chauvinism engaging
the representatives of the establishment of the transition period who
have retired a long time ago, Moscow cannot hide that it is lost and
does not understand the meaning and perspectives of Putin’s policy. It
is becoming clear that Putin is mad, he is in a hysteria and Olympic
self-importance.

The only real force that is able to curb Putin’s ambitions is the
General Staff which is trying to verify and clarify the information
that is put on the president’s table by different information agencies.

A lot of high-ranking military officials are risking their careers to
try to influence the political leadership and convey that a radical
policy is useless, and other ways of settlement of the problem should
be sought for.

Moscow is imposing the autonomous path onto the political activists in
Donetsk, Lugansk and Crimea, hoping that in a state of federalization
Ukraine will remain on the orbit of Russian influence. It is not ruled
out that the Ukrainian elites have made a decision and are ready to
give up on those regions to keep their sovereignty.

If Russia hopes to incorporate Dnepropetrovsk and Kharkov as well,
it is really fraught with a war, that will be Russia’s nightmare
because it will have to fight with not only the Ukrainian army but
also the Ukrainian people, well-armed and, unlike the Russian people,
aware what it is fighting for.

Now the Russian politics addresses its only allies, Chechens and
Tatars, but the Russians remembered about them too late, and it is not
known how the Tatars of Crimea and Volga region will react. Recently
a big delegation of Tatars visited Crimea and supported the Tatars of
Crimea and Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The question occurs why
the Tatars should support oligarchic Moscow. There is no motivation.

Is a second front emerging in the territory of Russia?

What will the new geopolitical configuration in Western Europe mean if
Russia gets the three regions of Ukraine? The Russians risk running
into the deadlock they created themselves for decades in favor of
those who have been trying to arrange this deadlock for 20 years.

In addition, a deadlock will occur in the Black Sea as well. Russia is
pushed to focus attention and efforts on Central Asia, and many people
are sincerely interested in having Russia as a significant power in
the direction of Central Asia. However, change of vector is possible
after erecting a wall in the Western direction. This is happening now.

“Maidan” simply triggered activation of foreign policy of Obama’s
left liberal administration that had fallen in lethargy. Without
Obama’s interference Maidan would not be able to make corrections
in the European geopolitics. However, Russia has set out to deal
with this perspective, actively pushing itself towards deadlock,
isolation and blockade.

Over the past few months Lragir.am has been using the key words
“isolation” and “blockade” in regard to Russia. Now these key words
are the most adequate notions describing the current situation. Moscow
will not be able to format the situation in a way that is acceptable
for the West. The regions that Russia intends to separate from Ukraine
are populated, aside from Russians, by millions of Ukrainians who are
not motivated to fight for the independence of Ukraine but this will
make a long-term issue for Moscow. The main concept of the Russian
propaganda is that there is no Ukrainian ethnicity and any attempt to
defend the independence of Ukraine is referred to as “Banderovshina”.

Let’s see what this concept will cost.

How can this new geopolitical situation be assessed in terms of
national interests of Armenia? In this case one may consider three
underlying factors.

Having appeared in international isolation Russia will drag its
vassals, primarily Armenia, into this abyss of isolation. Now it is
impossible to imagine what this will cost Armenia.

Aside from this, it is already clear that the United States and NATO
which skillfully handled the strategy of blockade and containment of
Turkey (which became a favorable perspective for Armenia) will now
have to recognize the Turkey’s irreplaceability in the Euro-Atlantic
politics and resort to its help and services. The role of Armenia as
a participant of the policy of containment of Turkey is obsolete.

Having been left without partners, Russia uses its chauvinistic
propaganda to call for help the countries and nations whose interests
are not in line with the interests of Armenia. The colors of the
Slavic-Islamic-Turkic union are hoisted. What will these allies demand
from Russia in return for their services?

These topics will be discussed widely and substantively. They will
have to be.

– See more at:

http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/32028#sthash.Di2ugKYn.dpuf

Numerous Traces Of Violence Found On Body Of Released Captive Khojoy

NUMEROUS TRACES OF VIOLENCE FOUND ON BODY OF RELEASED CAPTIVE KHOJOYAN

Tuesday,
March
04

Numerous traces of violence have been found on the body of Mamikon
Khojoyan, a 77-year old Armenian citizen who had been held captive in
Azerbaijani in recent months and was released today, Armenian Defense
Ministry’s spokesman Artsrun Hovhannisian told Aysor.am.

“He has a broken arm, a gunshot wound and bruises,” Hovhannisian said,
adding that other details of the medical examination will be released
tomorrow after the man’s blood tests are carried out.

Mamikon Khojoyan is a resident of Varin Karmiraghbyur village in
Armenia’s Tavush province. He was taken captive on January 28, 2014.

He suffers from a mental disorder.

The press service of the ICRC earlier confirmed information about M.

Khojoyan’s return. According to the ICRC, the Armenian citizen was
handed over under the patronage of ICRC employees in the border zone,
on the highway between the Armenian city of Ijevan and the Azerbaijani
city of Ghazakh.

Aysor.am

Armenian Scholarship Gets Short Shrift

ARMENIAN SCHOLARSHIP GETS SHORT SHRIFT

28.02.2014

Dear Editor,

I read with surprise the repeated assertion of Dr. Rouben Galchian’s
that “Armenia and Iran [Persia] could claim an existence of over
2,000 years… while Georgia became to be known as they are now, only
after 2,000 years”. The author shows lack of awareness of primary
sources. What European cartographers present is not the whole ‘truth’.

For his knowledge of the period in question, he should rely on the
Classical Armenian sources such as Movses Khorenatsi, Goryoun, Pavstos
Puzant, Movses Dskhurantsi, the Ashkharhatsoyts, and the countless
colophons and chronicles of Armenian manuscripts. In Classical Armenian
sources the name for Georgia is Õ~NÕ”O~@O~D [ Virk’], the name of the
country from which derives the modern Armenian name Õ~NO~@Õ¡Õ½Õ¿Õ¡Õ¶
[Vrastan]. The English name Georgia is used in modern cartography to
refer to the geographical territory K’art’li and for united country,
Sak’art’velo, the Armenian of which is Virk’. None of the maps the
author is referring to have the name Hayastan or for that matter
Iran. Do we then conclude that Hayastan and Iran did not exist? Of
course they existed. They were called Armenia and Persia respectively.

Khorenatsi says, “For whilst he assembled his legions of Atrpatakan,
he summoned the powerful mountain peoples of the Caucasus and the
armies of Albania and Georgia [Ô±Õ²Õ¸O~BÕ¡Õ¶Õ”O~A Õ¥O~B Õ~NO~@Õ¡O~A]
and descended into Mesopotamia”, or ‘The Albania and part of Georgia
[Ô±Õ¬Õ¡Õ¶O~D…Õ´Õ¡Õ½Õ¶ Õ”Õ¶Õ¹ Õ” Õ~NO~@Õ¡O~A] joined forces with all
the mountain peoples and invaded the land of Armenia in great force”.

Movses Dskhurantsi in his History of the Caucasian
Albanians (English translation by Prof.C.J.F.Dowsett,1961)
chapter 14 is headed by ‘A short account of St. Gregory, the
Illuminator of Armenia…as catholicos of Albania and Georgia [Õ”
Õ¯Õ¡Õ©Õ¸Õ²Õ”Õ¯Õ¸Õ½Õ¸O~BÕ©Õ”O~BÕ¶Ô±Õ²Õ¸O~BÕ¡Õ¶Õ”O~A Õ¥O~B Õ~NO~@Õ¡O~A],
his arrival in Albania'(p.19). In chapter 47, the historian gives an
account of the separation of the Georgian Church from the Armenian
Church in 608/609 AD

“Õ” ÕªÕ¡Õ´Õ¡Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ½ Ô±Õ¢O~@Õ¡Õ°Õ¡Õ´Õ¸O~BÕ~] Õ°Õ¡ÕµÕ¸O~A
Õ¯Õ¡Õ©Õ¸Õ²Õ”Õ¯Õ¸Õ½Õ”, Õ¢Õ¡ÕªÕ¡Õ¶Õ¥O~AÕ¡Õ¶ Õ~NÕ”O~@O~D Õ” Õ~@Õ¡ÕµÕ¸O~A
Õ´Õ”Õ¡Õ¢Õ¡Õ¶Õ¸O~BÕ©Õ¥Õ¶Õ§” [in the days of Abraham, Catholicos of
Armenia, the Georgians separated from the Armenians].

Goryoun, the biographer of Mesrob Mashtots, makes St. Gregory the
Illuminator’s grandson St. Grigoris bishop of ‘Virk’ [Vrastan] and
Aluank’ [Albania]. When referring to the missionary work of St. Mesrob
in chapter 21 Goryoun informs “And thus all over Armenia, Georgia, and
Albania, throughout his lifetime, in summer and winter” he witnessed
“the name of Jesus the Saviour” [ÔµO~B Õ¡ÕµÕ¶ÕºÕ§Õ½ ÕµÕ¡Õ´Õ¥Õ¶Õ¡ÕµÕ¶
Õ¯Õ¸Õ²Õ´Õ¡Õ¶Õ½ Õ~@Õ¡ÕµÕ¸O~A,Õ~NO~@Õ¡O~A Õ¥O~B Ô±Õ²Õ¸O~BÕ¡Õ¶Õ”O~A
Õ¦Õ¡Õ´Õ¥Õ¶Õ¡ÕµÕ¶ ÕªÕ¡Õ´Õ¡Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯Õ½…].

S.T. Eremyan in his magnificent introduction to the ‘Armenia According
to the [Ashkharhatsoyts] while commenting on Ptolemy’sAsiae tabula
tertia, writes “in his map of Sassanian Iran he represents the
political divisions, which existed in his time, which included also
the Transcaucasian countries, i.e. marzpanide Armenia (Arm[which
stands for Hayk’], Virk'[ Varjan which is Virk’ andAluank’ (p.26).

Eremyan provides an exhausting commentary on the name Virk’. I
will only present here the first few lines: “The territory
of Õ~NÕ”O~@O~D-also known as Õ~NO~@Õ¯Õ¡Õ¶; in Persian Gurgan; in
Syriac Gurzan; in Arabic Jurzan; in Greek Ibiria; in Latin Hiberia;
in Georgian K’art’li” (pp.83-84).There is no difference here to the
name used for our country. We, Armenians, call ourselves Hay, the
country Hayastan, and the entire Western world knows us as Armenians,
the country Armenia and the language as Armenian.

It is not desirable to ignore or deliberately falsify Classical
Armenian sources, which are significant primary sources for the study
of the peoples and countries neighboring Armenia. It is also not
desirable to be disrespectful regarding the achievement of Armenian
Armenologists [Adontz, Manadyan, Eremyan, Hovsepiants, Khatchikyan] in
order to score cheap points. The author can make a rapid survey of the
colophons of thousands of Armenian manuscripts to realize how damaging
his type of declarations are to the reputation of Armenian scholarship.

Yours,

Rev. Dr. Vrej Nerses Nersessian

http://www.keghart.com/Rev-Nersessian-Sources

RA Embassy To U.S.:Azerbaijan Prepares Ground For New Aggression Aga

RA EMBASSY TO U.S.:AZERBAIJAN PREPARES GROUND FOR NEW AGGRESSION AGAINST KARABAKH BY DISTORTING HISTORY AND ESSENCE OF CONFLICT

17:21 04/03/2014 >> REGION

Azerbaijani diplomacy and propaganda continue to mislead the
international community as well as the society of Azerbaijan by
falsifying the essence and history of Nagorno Karabakh conflict,
specifically Aghdam events. It is said in the statement released
yesterday by Armenian embassy to Unites States. The statement has been
published by several American competent media agencies such as the
Sacramento Bee, Digital Journal, One News Page, L.A. Biz, Ulitzer,
the Street etc.

By distorting the Khojaly events, Azerbaijani regime attempts to
escape the responsibility for the Armenian massacres in Sumgait
(February, 1988), Kirovabad (November, 1988), Baku (January, 1990),
Maragha (April 1992) and slaughter of its own population in Khojaly,
the document states.

“Azerbaijan strives to portray itself as a victim, thus trying to
prepare a moral ground both domestically and internationally to unleash
another war against Nagorno Karabakh,” it is said in the statement.

The Armenian embassy has noted that Azerbaijan rejects all
international appeals, including the appeal by the European Court
of Human Rights, to openly debate about Aghdam events of 1992. “In
that regard one can only ask why all who have expressed points of
views differing from Azerbaijani official version of the events have
been either killed, like journalist Mustafaev, or imprisoned like
journalist Fatullayev, or politically persecuted like Ayaz Mutalibov,
the first president of Azerbaijan?” the statement reads.

“In reality Khojaly was one of the Azerbaijani strongholds in the
heart of Nagorno-Karabakh which for many months as Human Rights
Watch put it pounded the capital of Nagorno Karabakh, Stepanakert
(). The
indiscriminate shelling and sniper shooting killed or maimed hundreds
of civilians, destroyed homes, hospitals and other objects that
are not legitimate military targets, and generally terrorized the
civilian population. Therefore, suppressing the Azerbaijani fire
had become a matter of survival for the people of Nagorno-Karabakh,”
it is said in the statement of the embassy.

As Azerbaijani journalist Eynulla Fatullayev noted “And even several
days prior to the attack, the Armenians had been continuously warning
the population about the planned operation through loudspeakers
and suggesting that the civilians abandon the town and escape from
the encirclement through a humanitarian corridor. According to the
Khojaly refugees’ own words, they had used this corridor and, indeed,
the Armenian soldiers positioned behind the corridor had not opened
fire on them.”

However, goes on Fatullayev “… part of the Khojaly inhabitants
had been fired upon by our own [Azerbaijani troops]… Whether it
was done intentionally or not is to be determined by investigators
… [They were killed] not by [some] mysterious [shooters], but by
provocateurs from the battalions of the National Front of Azerbaijan
… [The corpses] had been mutilated by our own …”

According to the statement, Ayaz Mutalibov, then the president of
Azerbaijan blamed his political opponents for killings in Khojaly. He
stated in an interview that “…the corridor, by which people could
escape, had nonetheless been left by the Armenians. So, why did they
have to open fire? Especially in the area around Aghdam, where there
was sufficient force at that time to get help to the people. As the
Khojali inhabitants, who narrowly escaped, say, it was all organized
in order to have grounds for my resignation. Some forces functioned
for the effort to discredit the president”

“The fact that Khojaly inhabitants felt victim of fierce domestic
political strife for power in Azerbaijan was confirmed also by then
Chairman of Azerbaijan’s Supreme Council Karayev and his successor
Mamedov, Azerbaijani Human Rights Activist Yunusov and others,”
the diplomatic mission of Armenia emphasized.

Heydar Aliyev, then a presidential hopeful in Azerbaijan stated that
“…the bloodshed will profit us. We should not interfere in the
course of events”

“Eynulla Fatullayev, the Chief Editor of the Azerbaijani newspaper
“Realny Azerbaijan” spent many years in prison for alleged defamation
of inhabitants of Khojaly. He appealed to the European court of Human
Rights, which ruled that the Azerbaijani government shall immediately
release Fatullayev. He was eventually released in 2011 and shortly
after confirmed to Radio Liberty that he has not changed his views
on Khojaly events and held “Azerbaijani fighters, not Armenians,
responsible for the 1992 killings” of Khojaly inhabitants” the
statement reads.

The Armenian embassy has noted that The Azerbaijani aggressive rhetoric
and distortion of history, backed by the billions worth acquisition of
offensive weaponry, bares serious threat to the security and stability
for the whole region and thus should be adequately countered by the
international community.

Source: Panorama.am

http://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/WR93/Hsw-07.htm#TopOfPage