Les rapports des médias sur la réunion Sarkissian-Tsarukyan non conf

ARMENIE
Les rapports des médias sur la réunion Sarkissian-Tsarukyan non confirmés

Les représentants du parti républicain d’Arménie (RPA) et son
principal challenger, le parti Arménie prospère n’ont pas confirmé que
leurs dirigeants, Serge Sarkissian et Gagik Tsarukyan, se sont
récemment réunis.

Plus tôt, un certain nombre de médias ont rapporté que cette réunion a
eu lieu samedi.

Le président du Parlement Galust Sahakian, qui est un vice-président
du RPA a dit qu’il n’a aucune information sur une telle réunion.

Il a dit qu’il ne pensait pas qu’elle ait eu lieu, mais il a ajouté
que si Gagik Tsarukyan a cherché une telle réunion, le Président
Sarkissian ne lui aurait certainement pas refuser une telle
opportunité.

Mikayel Melkumyan, un représentant du Parti Arménie prospère (PAP) de
Gagik Tsarukyan, a également déclaré qu’il ne possédait pas
d’informations sur la prétendue réunion.

samedi 8 novembre 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

Les Communistes d’Arménie ont commémoré le 97e anniversaire de la Ré

ARMENIE
Les Communistes d’Arménie ont commémoré le 97e anniversaire de la
Révolution d’octobre en Russie

Le 7 novembre, les Communistes d’Arménie -il en reste encore- ont fêté
le 97e anniversaire de la Révolution d’octobre en Russie. A Erévan,
une foule de quelques centaines de personnes était présente aux
cérémonies de dépôts de fleurs devant les statues dédiées au Premier
président-commissaire du peuple en Arménie, Alexandre Miasnikian ainsi
que le président de la Commune de Bakou et proche compagnon de Lénine,
Stépan Chahoumian. Yertchanig (> en arménien) Ghazarian, le
deuxième Secrétaire du Parti Communiste d’Arménie a dans son discours,
rappelé l’importance de la Révolution d’octobre pour l’ensemble de la
planète. Il a également prédit un> aux valeurs du
socialisme tant en Arménie que dans le monde car

Inauguration des fondations du futur mémorial du génocide arménien à

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN-100e ANNIVERSAIRE
Inauguration des fondations du futur mémorial du génocide arménien à
l’Université de Californie de Fresno

Des centaines de personnes ont assisté dernièrement aux fondations du
mémorial du génocide arménien à l’Université de Californie de Fresno.
Le mémorial devant être inauguré l’an prochain à l’occasion du 100ème
anniversaire du génocide arménien.

Selon le journal > parmi le public qui assistait à
cette cérémonie on notait, outre les membres de la communauté
arménienne, de nombreux représentants politiques et responsables de
l’Université de Californie de Fresno. Le président de l’Université,
Joseph Castro a indiqué dans son discours

No consensus between authorities and public until fair elections

No consensus between authorities and public until fair elections held
in Armenia – expert

12:00 / 08.11.2014

Nyut.am conducted interview with the expert of political and electoral
technology Armen Badalyan.

– Mr Badalyan, what are the new qualities in the current movement of
the trio? Is there anything with which this movement differs from the
previous ones?

– Naturally, there are some differences. In particular, one of the
forces comprising the trio has television, has other mass media means
while previously the rest forces were deprived of it. It expands their
audience. The difference is great in financial respect as well.
Previously, the organizers of the movement faced certain financial
issues while today it is not so as one of the forces of the trio has
big financial resource. The third difference is connected with the
number of MPs. The previous ones either did not have them or just
one-two. For instance, during the 2008 presidential elections just two
MPs were engaged who later were arrested in connection with March 1
developments. The one was arrested, the other went into hiding for
quite a long time.

– And what about content? Is there a difference of content?

– As to the content, more right to say in political respect the
difference is that previously when movements were being formed Armenia
was not in such dependence from geo-political centers and Russia in
particular, while now it is. And whether it wants or not, the
circumstance of this dependence must be taken into consideration. If
to be clearer, you must come to terms with Armenia’s membership to the
Eurasian Economic Union.
If to view wider, we’ll see that just like during the previous
movements, during this time as well, the main content of the
opposition’s activity is to present its programs, criticize the
authorities and try to come to power and implement own programs.
That is to say the main function of the opposition the main essence of
the movement is the same with just organizational differences.

– It may be concluded that the success of this movement is mostly
agreed with outside, in our case with Russia.

– Yes, it is so.

– Mr Badalyan, many are speaking about public consensus. Does it really exist?

– There is public consensus but not over the movement but over leaving
the homeland. If to view the immigration rate, we see a new phenomenon
which did not exist previously. In particular, in 2008, when the big
flow of immigration just started a tendency was being noted in public
moods: the people were a bit freezing their decision to immigrate to
show what the public fight will give. Currently, the consensus has
been formed in public and people are not waiting for hot autumns and
springs. As soon as they get an opportunity they leave immediately. I
mean that the public consensus is in immigrating and not in the
movement.

– Is there consensus between authorities and opposition, or more right
to say in authorities-public core?

– It will happen only in case of normal elections take place in
Armenia because the consensus between the public and the authorities
are free, fair and transparent elections. As far as the election
institute is not working in Armenia there cannot be consensus between
the people and the authorities.

– Do the authorities have enough resources to be able to confront the
movement if critical mass of people gathers in the square?

– It depends on vassalization process of Armenia. The issue is not
whether the authorities can confront if hundred thousand of people
gather in the streets. It can confront and even carry out what it did
on March 1, 2008. Theoretically everything is possible. The issue is
whether the authorities will be allowed to confront or not. The
permission is being given by Moscow.

– Many think that oligarch cannot fight against oligarchic system of
the authorities? Do you think so too?

– No, I do not. The world experience shows quite the opposite. The
best example is Ukraine’s. Oligarch Poroshenko went against the system
he used to make part of. During Yanukovich’s presidency he was economy
minister, he was foreign affairs minister and secretary of the defense
and security council. By the way the latter post is quite influential
in that country. Despite the circumstance that he was one of the
creators of the system people were complaining of, he went against the
authorities he fought and now he is the president of the country.

– Why do many political and public forces accept this movement rather painfully?

– About 75 parties are registered in Armenia’s Justice Ministry but
only few are actually operating – Republican party, Prosperous Armenia
party, Armenian National Congress, ARF-D a bit and Heritage with some
restrictions. There are no other influential political forces,
parties.
The same related to the public organizations or the so-called active
political unions. They are not influential. They are rather small with
their resources and their influence.

http://nyut.am/archives/278250?lang=en

Turkish Intellectuals Who Have Recognized The Armenian Genocide: Fik

Turkish Intellectuals Who Have Recognized The Armenian Genocide: Fikret Adanýr

By MassisPost
Updated: November 7, 2014

By Hambersom Aghbashian

Fikret Adanýr (born Oct. 3, 1941 in Foca, Turkey) is a Turkish
professor of history and philology. He studied English Philology at
the University of Istanbul(1962-1964), worked as a Turkish Language
Instructor in Vermont, USA(1964). During the years (1965 -1971), he
studied English Philology, History and Philosophy at the University of
Frankfurt am Main (M.A. in English Literature), then studied Slavic
Languages (Russian and Bulgarian) (1971-73) and completed his
post-graduate studies and research at University of Frankfurt am Main
(PhD in History, 1973-77). He held many academic positions where he
served as Research Assistant (East European History), University of
Frankfurt am Main(1978-79), Assistant Lecturer (East European
History), University of Giessen(1979-84), Assistant Lecturer (History
Department), Free University of Berlin(1984-86), Professor for
Southeast European History (with special focus on Ottoman-Turkish
History), Ruhr University Bochum(1986 to Present), and visiting
professor, Sabanci University, Istanbul (October 2002-February 2003).
He is the author of many books and has a very long list of published
books.(1)

Prof. Fikret Adanir participated in the Conference entitled The
Armenians during the Collapse of the Ottoman Empire that was held at
Istanbul’s Bogazici University in September 2005. In his speech, he
said, “a Turkish government may have to accept genocide accusation one
day due to impositions. This may please some circles. But, I don’t
think a concession made as a result of such impositions will be
beneficial for the future of Turkish-Armenian relations.” Adanir also
said that he was using the expression ‘Armenian Genocide’ in his
academic works, and added, “the dimension of the 1915-16 relocation is
far beyond than mass killings. A whole nation, regardless of whether
they were women, men, elderly or children, were relocated and died on
the roads. Their properties were seized, while those who survived this
incident were not allowed to return.” (2)

The Danish Royal Library has, together with the Armenian embassy, held
an exhibition on “The Armenian genocide and the Scandinavian
reaction”. Due to protests from the Turkish embassy, the library’s
director, Erland Kolding Nielsen, has agreed to hold an alternative
exhibition titled, “The so-called Armenian genocide.” This decision
has caused widespread debate and 37 Turkish intellectuals, including
Fikrat Adanýr, Taner Akçam, Cengiz Aktar, Murat Belge, Baskýn Oran and
Ýpek and Oral Çalýþlar, have in an open letter in Dec.2012 in
Denmark’s leading daily Berlingske, called on the library’s director
to reconsider his decision. They mentioned in their letter “By giving
the Turkish government the opportunity to present an “alternative
exhibit”, you support their policy of suppression and intimidation.
The support that you are extending to a regime that has made
opposition to confronting history and denial of the truth a
fundamental principle is equivalent to supporting a regime of
apartheid. We want to remind you that your support constitutes an
obstacle to democratization efforts in Turkey today.”(3)

In his research “The Reality and Relevance of the Armenian Genocide”,
1999, Prof Richard Hovannisian (UCLA), mentioned that “Fikret Adanir
explains the lack of readiness in Turkish society to face the truth of
the Armenian Genocide as being in large measure is the result of the
“official history” taught and propagated in the Republic of Turkey. He
offers an overview of Turkish nationalist historiography and how it
shapes public opinion.”(4)

According to ESI (European Stability Institute), Turkish historian
Halil Berktay, a professor at the prestigious Sabanci University in
Istanbul told ESI in early 2009, “Every country has foundation myths.
Turkey’s, however, thanks largely to the perseverance of Kemalist
dogma, has been virtually uncontested – at least till the 2000s.
Turkey was a late nation state. The hegemony of state Kemalism allowed
foundation myths to survive longer than in most nation states. He
added ” A few Turkish intellectuals, such as Taner Akcam or Fikret
Adanýr, addressed the Armenian issue in the 1990s. But they were
isolated from Turks in Turkey. The press did not cover their views.
Marginal journals or printing houses printed 1500 copies of one of
their books, for example.(5)
According to , (Oct 16, 2006), “Some
Turkish intellectuals also support the genocide thesis despite
opposition from Turkish nationalists; these include Ragip Zarakolu,
Ali Ertem, Taner Akçam, Halil Berktay, Fatma Muge Gocek and Fikret
Adanir.The reasons are: First, they cite the fact that the
organization members were criminals, and that those criminals were
specifically sent to escort the Armenians. This is regarded as
sufficient evidence of the government’s criminal intent. Second, the
fact that Armenians living outside the war zone were also removed.
Thirdly, it is argued that the thesis of simple relocation is flawed
due to the absence of the preparations which resettlement would
require. Fikret Adanir suggested that over a million lost their lives
during the events.(6)

A group of academics, journalists, artists and intellectuals have
released a statement condemning in the harshest terms what they define
as expressions that include “open hatred and hostility” towards
Armenians in Turkish schoolbooks, which were recently exposed by the
newspapers Agos and Taraf. The two newspapers recently published
reports on hateful remarks targeting Armenians in the textbooks used
in history classes, according to Today’s Zaman.

A letter accompanying the text of the condemnation, written by
historian Taner Akçam, notes that including such expressions as lesson
material to teach children is a disgrace. Prof. Fikret Adanir was one
of the academics who have participated in releasing the statement.(7)

—————-

1-
2-
3- genocide.aspx?
pageID=238&nID= 37144 &News CatID =396
4-
5-
6-
7- Turkish Intellectuals Condemn Anti-Armenian Textbooks.
Asbarez.com.Sept. 30th, 2014

http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/soeg/adanir.html
http://www.armeniapedia.org/wiki/Fikret_Adanir
http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/a-controversial
http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/history/centers/armenian/source109.html
http://www.esiweb.org/index.php?lang=en&id=322&debate_ID=2&slide_ID=3
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Armenian_Genocide
http://massispost.com/2014/11/turkish-intellectuals-who-have-recognized-the-armenian-genocide-fikret-adanyr/
www.newworldencyclopedia.org

Le film The Cut à la fête du cinéma à l’Egyptienne

Le film The Cut à la fête du cinéma à l’Egyptienne

Levée de rideau cette semaine sur la 36e édition du Festival
International du Film du Caire, prévue du 8 au 19 novembre. 16 longs
métrages sont en compétition, notamment en provenance des Etats-Unis,
d’Italie, de Chine, d’Iran et de Palestine. D’autres nouveaux-venus
sont également à découvrir.

Le Festival International du Film du Caire s’ouvre le dimanche 8
novembre à 19h15, avec la projec-tion du film The Cut du réalisateur
allemand d’origine turque, Fatih Akin, sur le génocide arménien. 16
films représentant 14 pays concou-rent cette année pour la Pyramide
d’or, qui sera attribuée le 18 mai à l’Opéra du Caire, qui accueille
cette année toutes les activités du Festival. >, affirme le critique Samir Farid, nouveau président du
festival, lors de la conférence de presse tenue la semaine dernière.

dimanche 9 novembre 2014,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=105093

Serge Avédikian magistral dans << Le scandale Paradjanov >>

Cinéma
Serge Avédikian magistral dans >

Dans ce film co-réalisé par Serge Avédikian (1) et Olena Fetisova,
avec dans le rôle de Serguei Paradjanov (1924-1990), un Serge
Avédikian éblouissant de vérité dans l’interprétaion de son modèle à
l’extravagance bien connue des cinéphiles, auteur du triomphe
international des Chevaux de feu (1965), trouve là un rôle à sa
démesure qui devrait faire date.

Une histoire allégorique, à l’esthétique léchée, qui nous entraîne
dans une libre fiction biographique de celui qui sera inquiété et
emprisonné par le pouvoir communiste pour trafic d’objets d’art et
homosexualité.

Outre le destin chaotique du grand cinéaste présenté tel un biopic
réaliste, le film est traité également sous deux angles, onirique et
surréaliste, tel que Paradjanov réalisait lui-même ses films. Il
montre certains moments importants de la vie et de l’oeuvre du poète.
En langue russe sous-titrée en français.

Lorsque Paradjanov sera libéré de prison en 1979, après cinq années
d’internement dans un camp de travail, il déclarera : >

Pour aider le film à atteindre un large public, tout en rendant
l’hommage mérité à Pardjanov, rejoindre le site de financement
participatif ICI

Sortie en salles le 7 janvier 2015. Une distribution Zootrope.

Jean Eckian

(1) Palme d’Or au Festival de Cannes 2010 pour le court-métrage
d’animationChienne d’histoire, Serge Avédikian a joué dans une
quarantaine de fictions. Outre de nombreux prix décernés
principalement en Europe de l’Est, en 2014, il a reçu le Prix Henri
Langlois de la Révélation et celui du Meilleur Réalisateur, Meilleur
Acteur, Meilleur Décor et Meilleur filmHayak 2014 en Arménie
(équivalent des Césars).

Éléments d’information

Extraits de la filmographie de Sergueï Paradjanov

1959 : Le Premier gars
1961 : Rhapsodie ukrainienne
1962 : Une fleur sur la pierre
1964 : Les Chevaux de feu
1967 : Hagop Hovnatanian (court-métrage)
1968 : Sayat Nova / censuré (La couleur de la grenade)
1984 : La Légende de la forteresse de Souram
1988 : Achik Kérib, conte d’un poète amoureux
1992 : Paradjanov : La Confession

dimanche 9 novembre 2014,
Jean Eckian (c)armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=105124

The Cut, de Fatih Akin, le film qui va faire grincer les dents en Tu

Cinéma
The Cut, de Fatih Akin, le film qui va faire grincer les dents en Turquie

Présenté en avant-première le 7 novembre à Paris, le film du cinéaste
germano-turc Fatih Akin, risque de faire grincer plus d’une dent en
Turquie. Il devrait en effet sortir sur les écrans de 5 villes, le 5
décembre, Ã Ankara, Istanbul, Izmir, Antalya et EskiÅ?ehir.

En France, le film sera projeté dans environ 120 salles, Ã partir du
15 janvier 2015, avec des dialogues doublés en Arménien, Turc et Arabe
sous-titrés en français. Distribution Pyramide Films.

Il s’agit là d’un film épique dont la toile de fond retrace le
génocide des Arméniens. L’histoire en elle-même amène le héros
(Nazaret Manoogian), forgeron de son état -interprété par l’acteur
franco-algérien Tahar Rahim- qui a été astreint par les autorités
ottomanes à des travaux de force après avoir refusé de se convertir Ã
l’Islam. Laissé pour mort après une tentative d’évasion, il sera sauvé
par Mehmet, mais perdra l’usage de la parole.

Certaines scènes de violence seront probablement relevées dans la
presse, tant elles sont semblables aux exactions montrées sur internet
et qui ensanglantent actuellement le Moyen-Orient.

Vivant un calvaire au quotidien jusqu’en 1923, humiliation sur
humiliation, le seul but qui maintient en vie Nazaret est de retrouver
sa femme et ses deux filles, dont on imagine qu’elles font partie des
convois de déportés qui menèrent les survivants jusque dans le désert
de Syrie. Nombre d’Arméniens auront la gorge serrée à l’approche de la
dernière image.

A l’issue de la projection en avant-première, Fatih Akin a bien voulu
se plier au jeu des questions-réponses posées par les journalistes sur
les conditions de tournage et la problématique turco-arménienne (Voir
ICI). Parmi celles-ci, Ã la question de savoir s’il avait été inquiété
pour avoir réalisé ce film, Fatih Akin confie que seuls des
`fachistes` turcs l’ont menacé.

Jean Eckian

dimanche 9 novembre 2014,
Jean Eckian ©armenews.com

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=105107

Respected Judge Joins Board Of Pasadena Genocide Memorial Project

RESPECTED JUDGE JOINS BOARD OF PASADENA GENOCIDE MEMORIAL PROJECT

Friday, November 7th, 2014

Dikran Tevrizian

Retired Federal Court Judge Dikran Tevrizian Re-joins the Board of
the Pasadena Armenian Genocide Committee

PASADENA, Calif.–Continuing a wave of positive momentum, the
Pasadena Armenian Genocide Memorial Committee announced today that
Retired Federal Court Judge Dikran Tevrizian has rejoined the Board
of Directors of the local non-profit. Judge Tevrizian was the first
Federal Court Judge in US history of Armenian ancestry and widely
regarded throughout California as a civic leader of impeccable
reputation.

“I am extremely pleased and honored that Judge Tevrizian has returned
to our Board for the home stretch of this important project. Judge
Tevrizian is one of the most admired and respected Armenian Americans
in our country and to have him add his name, support and work ethic
to our project continues to showcase our positive momentum and wide
support from the Armenian American Community,” commented Interim-Board
Chair Bernard Melekian.

The Pasadena Armenian Genocide Memorial Committee is in the final plan
check stages with the City of Pasadena and will be breaking ground
shortly. The memorial project is deeply symbolic of the events of
99 years ago and appropriately respects the memories of the fallen
martyrs and their descendants. Judge Tevrizian joins a board with
exciting new leadership under Former Pasadena Police Chief Melekian’s
Chairmanship and the addition of Geragos and Geragos as legal counsel.

The Board includes: Sandra Siraganian, Shoghig Yepremian, Greg
Afsharian, David Gevorkyan and Retired State Assemblymember Anthony
Portantino. Its non-profit fiscal agent is the Community Foundation
of the Verdugos.

http://asbarez.com/128717/respected-judge-joins-board-of-pasadena-genocide-memorial-project/

BAKU: Keeping Up Paris Dialogue Between Azerbaijani, Armenian Presid

KEEPING UP PARIS DIALOGUE BETWEEN AZERBAIJANI, ARMENIAN PRESIDENTS VERY IMPORTANT – JAMES WARLICK

APA, Azerbaijan
Nov 7 2014

[ 07 November 2014 19:16 ]

“We fully expect that the two Presidents will continue to meet on a
regular basis”

Baku. Rufat Ahmadzada – APA. “The presidents’ meetings have helped to
move forward the process of a negotiated settlement, and it’s important
to continue these meetings”, U.S. Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Group,
James Warlick, who have undertaken mediation for the settlement of
the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, told APA.

“Speaking for the US, we fully expect that the two Presidents will
continue to meet on a regular basis as they have done recently. Their
meetings have helped to move forward the process of a negotiated
settlement. We will also continue to meet with the Foreign Ministers,
including at the OSCE ministerial in Basel next month. It is important
to keep up the dialogue which took place most recently at the Paris
summit”, said James Warlick.