Turks Were Giving Death Warrant To A Whole Race – NY Times Overview

TURKS WERE GIVING DEATH WARRANT TO A WHOLE RACE – NY TIMES OVERVIEW ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

15:18 * 02.12.14

On the eve of World War I, there were two million Armenians in the
declining Ottoman Empire. By 1922, there were fewer than 400,000. The
others — some 1.5 million — were killed in what historians consider
a genocide.

As David Fromkin put it in his widely praised history of World War I
and its aftermath, “A Peace to End All Peace”: “Rape and beating were
commonplace. Those who were not killed at once were driven through
mountains and deserts without food, drink or shelter. Hundreds of
thousands of Armenians eventually succumbed or were killed .”

The man who invented the word “genocide”– Raphael Lemkin, a lawyer
of Polish-Jewish origin — was moved to investigate the attempt to
eliminate an entire people by accounts of the massacres of Armenians.

He did not, however, coin the word until 1943, applying it to Nazi
Germany and the Jews in a book published a year later, “Axis Rule in
Occupied Europe.”

But to Turks, what happened in 1915 was, at most, just one more messy
piece of a very messy war that spelled the end of a once-powerful
empire. They reject the conclusions of historians and the term
genocide, saying there was no premeditation in the deaths, no
systematic attempt to destroy a people. Indeed, in Turkey today it
remains a crime — “insulting Turkishness” — to even raise the issue
of what happened to the Armenians.

In the United States, a powerful Armenian community centered in
Los Angeles has been pressing for years for Congress to condemn the
Armenian genocide. Turkey, which cut military ties to France over a
similar action, has reacted with angry threats. A bill to that effect
nearly passed in the fall of 2007, gaining a majority of co-sponsors
and passing a committee vote. But the Bush administration, noting that
Turkey is a critical ally — more than 70 per cent of the military
air supplies for Iraq go through the Incirlik airbase there —
pressed for the bill to be withdrawn, and it was.

The roots of the genocide lie in the collapse of the Ottoman Empire.

The empire’s ruler was also the caliph, or leader of the Islamic
community. Minority religious communities, like the Christian
Armenians, were allowed to maintain their religious, social and legal
structures, but were often subject to extra taxes or other measures.

Concentrated largely in eastern Anatolia, many of them merchants and
industrialists, Armenians, historians say, appeared markedly better
off in many ways than their Turkish neighbors, largely small peasants
or ill-paid government functionaries and soldiers.

At the turn of the 20th Century, the once far-flung Ottoman empire was
crumbling at the edges, beset by revolts among Christian subjects to
the north — vast swaths of territory were lost in the Balkan Wars
of 1912-13 — and the subject of coffee house grumbling among Arab
nationalist intellectuals in Damascus and elsewhere.

The Young Turk movement of ambitious, discontented junior army officers
seized power in 1908, determined to modernize, strengthen and “Turkify”
the empire. They were led by what became an all-powerful triumvirate
sometimes referred to as the Three Pashas.

In March of 1914, the Young Turks entered World War I on the side
of Germany. They attacked to the east, hoping to capture the city of
Baku in what would be a disastrous campaign against Russian forces in
the Caucuses. They were soundly defeated at the battle of Sarikemish.

Armenians in the area were blamed for siding with the Russians and
the Young Turks began a campaign to portray the Armenians as a kind
of fifth column, a threat to the state. Indeed, there were Armenian
nationalists who acted as guerrillas and cooperated with the Russians.

They briefly seized the city of Van in the spring of 1915.

Armenians mark the date April 24, 1915, when several hundred Armenian
intellectuals were rounded up, arrested and later executed as the start
of the Armenian genocide and it is generally said to have extended
to 1917. However, there were also massacres of Armenians in 1894,
1895, 1896, 1909, and a reprise between 1920 and 1923.

The University of Minnesota’s Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies
has compiled figures by province and district that show there were
2,133,190 Armenians in the empire in 1914 and only about 387,800
by 1922.

Writing at the time of the early series of massacres, The New York
Times suggested there was already a “policy of extermination directed
against the Christians of Asia Minor.”

The Young Turks, who called themselves the Committee of Unity and
Progress, launched a set of measures against the Armenians, including
a law authorizing the military and government to deport anyone they
“sensed” was a security threat.

A later law allowed the confiscation of abandoned Armenian property.

Armenians were ordered to turn in any weapons that they owned to the
authorities. Those in the army were disarmed and transferred into
labor battalions where they were either killed or worked to death.

There were executions into mass graves, and death marches of men,
women and children across the Syrian desert to concentration camps
with many dying along the way of exhaustion, exposure and starvation.

Much of this was quite well documented at the time by Western
diplomats, missionaries and others, creating widespread wartime outrage
against the Turks in the West. Although its ally, Germany, was silent
at the time, in later years documents have surfaced from ranking German
diplomats and military officers expressing horror at what was going on.

Some historians, however, while acknowledging the widespread deaths,
say what happened does not technically fit the definition of genocide
largely because they do not feel there is evidence that it was
well-planned in advance.

The New York Times covered the issue extensively — 145 articles in
1915 alone by one count — with headlines like “Appeal to

Turkey to Stop Massacres.” The Times described the actions against
the Armenians as “systematic,” “authorized, and “organized by the
government.”

The American ambassador, Henry Morganthau Sr., was also outspoken. In
his memoirs, the ambassador would write: “When the Turkish authorities
gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving
the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well, and
in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to
conceal the fact.”

Following the surrender of the Ottoman Empire in 1918, the Three
Pashas fled to Germany, where they were given protection. But the
Armenian underground formed a group called Operation Nemesis to hunt
them down. On March 15, 1921, one of the pashas was shot dead on a
street in Berlin in broad daylight in front of witnesses. The gunman
pled temporary insanity brought on by the mass killings and a jury
took only a little over an hour to acquit him. It was the defense
evidence at this trial that drew the interest of Mr. Lemkin, the
coiner of “genocide.”

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/12/02/genocide/
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/timestopics/topics_armeniangenocide.html

Tournee Mondiale De System Of A Down Pour Les 100 Ans Du Genocide Ar

TOURNEE MONDIALE DE SYSTEM OF A DOWN POUR LES 100 ANS DU GENOCIDE ARMENIEN LA TOURNEE SE TERMINERA AVEC UN CONCERT A EREVAN LE 23 AVRIL

GENOCIDE ARMENIEN

Le groupe americain d’origine armenienne annonce une tournee qui aura
pour but premier de marquer la celebration du centième anniversaire
du genocide armenien

Connu egalement sous l’acronyme SOAD, le groupe US dechaîne les
passions depuis sa creation en 1994 dans l’Etat de Californie. Serj
Tankian (voix), Daron Malakian (guitare, voix), Shavo Odadjian (basse,
voix) et John Dolmayan (batterie) prouvent qu’il est possible de
maîtriser l’agressivite du metal tout en evitant les cliches trop
souvent lies au genre. Leurs origines armeniennes leur confèrent une
dimension spirituelle supplementaire et une vision de la musique comme
moyen d’expression unique. Ils abordent des sujet profonds tels que
la drogue, les enfants soldats, l’emprisonnement, les guerres et les
genocides avec delicatesse, conviction et intelligence.

Quelque part entre Faith No More et Rage Against The Machine, SOAD
presente le rock dur avec finesse. Leur style interpelle dès la
sortie de leur premier disque en 1998. Cet album est porte par des
titres aussi puissants que Suite Pee et le succès est immediat. Leur
collaboration avec le producteur de Slayer, Rick Rubin, continue sur
leur deuxième opus. Toxicity est encore plus etoffe. SOAD, nous offre
d’ailleurs son succès le plus emblematique avec Chop Suey (231 401
514 vues sur YouTube). Le quatuor sortira ensuite Steal This Album
(2002) et le diptyque Mezmerize/Hypnotize (2005).

Plusieurs fois nomine et recompense aux Grammy Awards, System Of A
Down annonce son retour sur scène pour une tournee bien particulière

04/10 – London, England @ Wembley Arena

04/13 – Cologne, Germany @ Lanxess Arena

04/14 – Lyon, France @ La Halle Tony Garnier

04/16 – Brussels, Belgium @ Forest National

04/17 – Amsterdam, Netherlands @ Ziggo Dome

04/20 – Moscow, Russia @ Olympisky

04/23 – Yerevan, Armenia @ Republic Square

>
a dit le chanteur Serj Tankian. >.

Le batteur John Dolmayan a ajoute : >. Le groupe, cependant, vise a preciser qu’ il
n’est pas contre le peuple turc et que

Ashot Gulian A Rencontre Frank Pallone

ASHOT GULIAN A RENCONTRE FRANK PALLONE

Artsakh-USA

Washington – Le 1er decembre, le president de l’Assemblee nationale
du Haut-Karabagh, Ashot Gulian, a rencontre Frank Pallone, membre du
Congrès, co-president du Caucus sur les questions armeniennes. Les
deux responsables ont discute du règlement pacifique du conflit du
Haut-Karabakh et du large eventail de questions liees a la mise en
oeuvre des programmes humanitaires.

Ashot Gulian a remercie le Congrès americain qui a condamne la
destruction de l’helicoptère de l’Arstakh Air force, consideree comme
une provocation de l’Azerbaïdjan.

mardi 2 decembre 2014, Jean Eckian (c)armenews.com

Week-End Difficile Pour Deux Cadres De La Selection Armenienne

WEEK-END DIFFICILE POUR DEUX CADRES DE LA SELECTION ARMENIENNE

FOOTBALL

Les deux joueurs majeurs de la selection armenienne que sont
l’attaquant Yura Movsisyan et le meneur de jeu Henrikh Mkhitaryan
ont joue ce dimanche. Malheureusement, Les deux numeros 10 ont connu
la defaite.

Yura Movsisyan affrontait le Lokomotiv Moscou avec son equipe du
Spartak Moscou dans un derby moscovite opposant deux equipes du
haut de tableau du championnat russe. Après un match serre et âpre,
l’attaquant armenien a connu la defaite (1-0 pour le Lokomotiv) et
a meme ete remplace a la 70ème minute de jeu. Le Spartak reste 6ème
au classement du championnat russe, et pourra tenter de se racheter
dès jeudi face a Rostov pour se rapprocher du podium.

La situation d’Henrikh Mkhitaryan est plus compliquee que celle
de son compatriote. Son club du Borussia Dortmund est dernier du
championnat allemand et a connu une nouvelle defaite – sa 8ème en 13
matchs de championnat – ce dimanche face a Francfort. Mkhitaryan, en
difficulte dans le jeu et en manque de confiance, n’a pas pu eviter
a son equipe de perdre sur le score de 2-0. Le Borussia connaît une
saison pour l’instant paradoxale : Première de son groupe en coupe
d’Europe après 4 victoires en 5 matchs, l’equipe reste dernière en
championnat allemand. Ce nouveau mauvais resultat enfonce un peu plus
Dortmund dans la crise et le prochain match de championnat de vendredi
face a Hoffenheim (7ème au classement) apparaît comme primordial pour
se relancer.

Arthur Altounian

mardi 2 decembre 2014, Ara (c)armenews.com

Nuclear Chicken in the Middle East

Nuclear Chicken in the Middle East

By Eric Margolis

November 30, 2014 “ICH ” – To no
surprise, nuclear talks between Iran and major world powers have become
stalemated.

Iran will not sink “to its knees” to win a nuclear deal with the great
powers, said its leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, after the failure of six
months of talks in Vienna.

However, the talks will continue until at least next March. Pity the poor
negotiators: besides being excruciatingly boring, dealing with the tough,
savvy Iranians is like pulling teeth. The only nationality I ever saw get
the better of Iranians in negotiations were Armenians.

The United States has been waging economic and political warfare on the
Islamic Republic since 1979. Only Cuba has been pounded longer. Both have
suffered hugely.

Of late, Iranian nuclear scientists and technicians have been murdered in
broad daylight. Nuclear installations have been sabotaged. The Stuxnet
virus allegedly unleashed by the US and Israel against Iran’s centrifuges
risked a catastrophic explosion or the release of nuclear contamination. In
neighboring, Iraq, some 300 of its former nuclear technicians and
scientists have been mysteriously murdered during the US occupation.

Iran’s economy has been very seriously damaged by the US-led boycott and
commercial restrictions. Iranians are suffering mounting inflation,
shortages of goods, and a collapsing currency. Iranians are fed up being
the target of western sanctions.

In a major concession, last summer Iran converted or diluted 200kg of
uranium enriched to 20%, rendering its unusable for any potential further
enrichment into nuclear weapons fuel.

The UN Atomic Energy Agency certified this procedure. The balance of Iran’s
uranium stockpile is at 5% – adequate for energy production but not for
weapons. Half its 20,000 centrifuges used to enrich uranium are shut down.
UN inspectors or cameras closely watch Iranian nuclear installations – not
to mention American and Israeli satellites.

So why does Iran stick to its guns – at least so far – and refuse make a
deal limiting or ending its production of nuclear fuel? Why endure all the
political and economic punishment and the never very distant threat of
attack by the US and/or Israel?

First, because nuclear energy has become a potent nationalist symbol for
Iran. Ayatollah Khomeini has repeatedly asserted that what he calls the
“western colonial powers” (read the US, Britain, France) have long sought
to deny modern technology to the Muslim world in order to keep it backward
and dependent on them. This is, of course, just what Imperial Britain did
with India.

Iranians point to the dire example of Iraq – the most industrialized and
technologically advanced Arab nation – that was destroyed, they say, for
this very reason.

A self-sufficient nuclear power industry will help assure Iran’s economic
and political independence and a time when oil reserves in this nation of
70 million are falling. Nuclear power is a UN-granted right so long as it
stays peaceful. Iran’s nuclear industry has been vigorously inspected for
over a decade by the UN, with no major violations discovered.

Ayatollah Khomeini has issued a fatwah (religious decree) banning nuclear
weapons, vowing that Iran would never possess or use them. US intelligence
has repeatedly stated that Iran has no nuclear weapons.

Ironically, its is the existing declared nuclear powers – the US, Russia,
China, France, Britain – who are in violation of the 1970 Non-Proliferation
Treaty. The pact denied nuclear weapons to other nations provided that the
signatories rapidly eliminate their nuclear arsenals. Four decades later,
none have complied with the treaty, while Israel, India, Pakistan and North
Korea have all secretly built nuclear arsenals.

But this does not matter to Iran’s many enemies. They continue to raise a
hue and cry. Way back in 2006, Israel was claiming Iran would have a
nuclear weapon “in six months.” We have heard similar claims ever since.

Since no nuclear weapons have been identified in Iran, its enemies now
insist Tehran is taking peaceful nuclear energy to the “breakout” point,
from which a dash to nuclear weapons in 3-6 months will be possible. What
they don’t discuss is that besides Iran not having any nuclear weapons, it
will have a very difficult task miniaturizing and hardening one to fit it
into a missile warhead. Tehran lacks reliable, accurate medium-range
missiles to deliver a nuclear strike. Its Shahab-3 is a glorified
Soviet/North Korean Scud that is wildly inaccurate, mechanically
unreliable, and slow to fuel.

Even so, Israel and its US Congressional allies now insist the danger is a
mad mullah in Tehran deciding to commit nuclear hara-kiri to destroy
Israel. The “mad mullah” was a favorite bogeyman of the Victorian British
Empire. Iran’s leadership is neither mad, stupid nor suicidal.

Far more important, who would Iran attack if it had nuclear weapons? The
USA or Israel? Iran has no long-range missiles. Iran would be vaporized
minutes after launching a nuclear strike. Israel’s extensive nuclear
arsenal – missiles, strike aircraft, submarine launched missiles – would
survive any surprise first strike. Iran would be quickly destroyed by
Israel’s counter-strike.

The real reason for simmering hostility between Israel and Iran is
Palestine. Now that most of the feeble Arab states have been removed from
the former anti-Israel coalition, the only remaining stalwart defender of
Palestinian rights – and opponent of Israel’s total absorption of the West
Bank and Golan – is Iran.

For Israel’s security, the best option is to make peace with Iran – which
used to be a close Iranian ally. But Israel’s current hard right leaders
are determined to cement Israel’s rule over the West Bank even if it means
risking war with Iran.

Israel cleverly concealed its nuclear weapons program from American
inspectors, according to defector Mordechai Vanunu. Israel no doubt fears
that Iran is doing exactly the same. My long-standing proposal has been for
Israel and Iran to mutually inspect one-another’s nuclear facilities along
with UN staff.

But time for a reasonable solution to Iran’s nuclear challenge is running
out. Once the Republicans take over the US Senate is January, 2015,
Israel’s influence over Congress will become decisive and irresistible.
Iran knows this and is feeling the pressure mounting.

Copyright Eric S. Margolis 2014

Click for Spanish
,
German
,
Dutch
,
Danish
,
French
,
translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

Armenia Applauds Hejinian Art Exhibit

Armenia Applauds Hejinian Art Exhibit

By Tom Vartabedian on November 29, 2014

YEREVAN–Artist Daniel Varoujan Hejinian of Chelmsford, Mass., is not
one to sit idle very long, not when his heritage is at stake.

Armenia’s First Lady Rita Sargsyan greets Hejinian at the Presidential
Palace in Yerevan.

Weeks after his annual billboard blitz throughout Greater Boston and
watching the monument he designed dedicated in Lowell, off he went to
Yerevan for a personal exhibit at the National Gallery of Armenia.

Called “Peace of Art” (), the exhibition was part of
the 5th Armenia-Diaspora Conference organized by the Republic Ministry
of Diaspora and dedicated to the 23rd anniversary of Armenian
independence and to the Armenian Genocide Centennial in 2015.

Some 2,000 guests piled into the National Gallery to view the artist’s
work, including Prime Minister Hovik Abrahamyan, Diaspora Minister
Hranush Hakobyan, leaders and representatives of Diasporan Armenian
organizations, public and political figures, as well as artists of
every kind.

According to Hejinian, it was a cultural infusion that left viewers
with an indelible impression.

“I’m truly grateful for having this opportunity to exhibit some of my
best work in a country where my passion exists,” said Hejinian. “The
people here were most receptive. Everywhere I went, hospitality
followed. The honor truly lies with all those who made this moment
become a reality.”

Pieces of artwork ‘From Genocide to Independence’ representing
Hejinian’s exhibit that took place in Armenia this fall.

For openers, Hejinian was welcomed to the Presidential Palace by First
Lady Rita Sargsyan where he donated a three-paneled painting
(triptych) titled, “From Genocide to Independence.” Other
contributions were made to the National Gallery, Ministry of Diaspora,
and Ministry of Culture.

Hejinian was presented the prestigious Arshile Gorky Medal by Hakobyan
as a token of appreciation.

Karen Aghamyan, president of the Union of Artists of Armenia, granted
an honorary membership certificate to the artist.

Artist Daniel Varoujan Hejinian is presented the Arshile Gorky Medal
from Diasporan Minister Hranush Hakobyan.

Hejinian’s portrait later graced the cover of Elite Life Magazine
published in Armenia, together with more photos and an extensive story
inside.

Three showrooms inside the gallery housed the exhibit, featuring 61
works of art in all. The array included 40 graphic pieces and 21
paintings, including 2 triptychs. Aside from the “Genocide to
Independence” panel, there was another titled “Crime of the Century,”
which Hejinian dedicated to the Centennial observance, along with
other “Peace of Art” collectables from his romantic series.

Hejinian was born to a family of Armenians who survived the Armenian
Genocide of 1915 and took shelter in Syria. He heard stories of the
brutal massacres as a child, and saw it repeatedly through the eyes of
his parents.

Since 1996, he has raised signs annually throughout Massachusetts
commemorating the genocide, many times under duress and retaliation
from Turkish naysayers. Despite the resistance, Hejinian has
persevered with his billboard mission, funding the project out of his
own pocket.

Among the artwork exhibited was “Hands of a Mother,” after which a
design was sculptured from stone and placed at the foot of City Hall
in Lowell, Mass.–the first such genocide memorial on government land
in the United States.

The compelling memorial was designed for the Armenian Genocide
Monument Committee of Merrimack Valley, symbolizing the city’s mill
era and the immigrants who toiled there following the genocide.

The design shows two hands weaving fabric above an Armenian cross
(khatchkar), designed to represent the hopes and dreams of those who
survived the atrocity and those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.

“Love for his homeland, family, nature, and heritage prevails in all
of his artwork,” said Hakobyan. “Just as the great writer Daniel
Varoujan portrayed the sorrow of Armenians in his work, so has this
artist with his brushstrokes. The two are mutually connected by their
art form.”

Among those attending the ceremony in Armenia was Middlesex County
Sheriff Peter Koutoujian, who served as honorary chairman of the
Lowell memorial dedication. Koutoujian presented his opening remarks
and expressed gratitude to the Ministry of Diaspora for the invitation
to participate.

The sheriff spoke proudly of his compatriot, lauding his artistic
talents and the message they convey to the world about the crime
perpetrated by the Ottoman Turks in the early 20th century.

Art critic Shahen Khachatryan spoke about Hejinian’s paintings and
praised his unique style and high mastery of the medium.

In the end, Hejinian expressed gratitude to the Ministry and to
Hakobyan, in particular, for turning his dream of having a personal
exhibition in the homeland into a reality. He also conveyed gratitude
to his wife and daughter for encouraging him to organize the
exhibition.

All three showrooms in the National Gallery were agog with visitors.
The first was dedicated to the 100th anniversary, and included pieces
from Hejinian’s “Peace of Art” collection that reflect human suffering
of every magnitude.

Hejinian’s romantic works occupied a second exhibition room,
expressing his love of life, women, and music, while a third gallery
focused on independence, and included a striking image of doves flying
in a peaceful sky while the Armenian Army is engaged in a glorious
parade.

“The most significant achievement of independence is the creation of
the Armenian Army,” Hejinian feels.

The exhibition took place from Sept. 18 to Oct. 20, attracting
everyone from casual townsfolk and students to high-ranking officials
and dignitaries both near and afar.

According to the artist Martiros, “Varoujan is a master of color and
composition, flexible, diverse and honest with his interpretation.
He’s a brilliant representative of 21st-century art.”

“Peace of Art” is a non-profit organization founded by Hejinian in
2003 that uses art as an educational tool to bring awareness to the
universal human condition while promoting peaceful solutions to
conflict.

The artist dedicates his efforts to the peace keepers and peace
achievers around the world, and those who had the courage to place
themselves on the line for the betterment of humanity.

http://armenianweekly.com/2014/11/29/armenia-applauds-hejinian-art-exhibit/
www.peaceofart.org

1000 violations du cessez-le-feu par l’Azerbaïdjan la semaine écoulé

ARMENIE-AZERBAÏDJAN
1000 violations du cessez-le-feu par l’Azerbaïdjan la semaine écoulée

La situation est quasiment normale sur le front arméno-azéri, nous ont
indiqué les ministres de la Défense d’Arménie et de la République du
Haut Karabagh. Néanmoins entre le 23 et le 29 novembre sur la ligne de
front les troupes azéries ont violé à près de 1000 reprises le régime
du cessez-le-feu en tirant plus de 12 000 projectiles en direction des
positions arméniennes. L’armée arménienne s’est toutefois abstenu de
répliquer à chaque tir, répondant

Armenian experts comment on situation in Azerbaijan and internationa

Armenian experts comment on situation in Azerbaijan and international response

13:16 * 30.11.14

The situation involving human rights, development of government and
democratic institutions is getting worse in Azerbaijan day by day, and
Azerbaijan’s society is facing serious challenges, political scientist
Hrant Melik-Shahnazaryan told Tert.am.

“The country has turned into a clan tyranny, which is impossible to
conceal,” he said.

With respect to international reaction, Mr Melik-Shahnazaryan said:

“Official Baku is turning a deaf ear to international response or
criticism. The Aliyev regime must believe Azerbaijan is of much
greater interest to the international community in other respects and,
using its oil and gas reserves and communication network, can hope
that the international community will not focus its attention on the
domestic developments in that country.”

Azerbaijan’s calculations sometimes prove correct.

“However, Azerbaijan is running out of this resource, and public
discontent is growing far beyond official Baku’s expectations. So
Azerbaijan is going to see changes sooner or later,” Mr
Melik-Shahnazaryan said.

The international community has no sufficient means of pressing
Azerbaijan. Criticism does not force Azerbaijan to change anything.

“That is, in Great Britain or Belgium society demands that their
authorities stop cooperating with tyrannical regimes. And the pressure
is growing. If Azerbaijan considers the developments, European states’
leaders cannot ignore public pressure, which is the reason for growing
criticism, while Azerbaijan is running out of its resource to counter
the criticism,” the expert said.

Azerbaijan has not the sufficient political resource to dampen down
public discontent on the one hand, and deceive the international
community on the other hand, doing so for years.

“I am sure that the Aliyev regime will sooner or later find itself in
international isolation,” Mr Melik-Shahnazaryan said.

Expert in Azerbaijani studies Sargis Asatryan believes that the
international criticism over human rights protection is now a means of
pressing Azerbaijan.

“That is, certain circles in the West are making use of it to exert
even greater pressure on Azerbaijan. It is no secret that the human
rights situation is Azerbaijan is poor. But we should not forget
Azerbaijan is a very important partner for the West, especially in oil
and gas cooperation and, to an extent, in the context of anti-Russian
policy,” he said.

International organizations are implementing a “stick and carrot
policy” toward Azerbaijan.

“It is common knowledge that the international community has always
turned a blind eye to different things if it meets its interests,” Mr
Asatryan said.

He does not see any possibility of sanctions against Azerbaijan now.

“Any small structure may turn into a ‘hot spot’ in Azerbaijan. The
country is facing such problems as indigenous peoples, Islamists, a
grave social situation. The authorities appear to be able to control
the situation now, but further developments will show if they will
succeed,” the expert said.

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/11/30/hrant-meliq-shahnazaryan/

Bolivia aprueba por unanimidad una resolución por el Genocidio Armen

Bolivia aprueba por unanimidad una resolución por el Genocidio Armenio

29.11.14

El pasado miércoles 26 de noviembre, laAsamblea de Bolivia aprobó por
unanimidad una resolución en solidaridad con las reivindicaciones del
pueblo armenio y condenando “todapolítica negacionista respecto al
genocidio y los crímenes de lesa humanidad sufridos por la nación
armenia”.

En diálogo con Prensa Armenia, la senadora Zonia Guardia Melgar,
presidenta en ejercicio de la Cámara de Senadores de Bolivia, explicó
que “la declaración camaral se ha sacado por unanimidad tanto en la
Cámara de Senadores como en la Cámara de Diputados, con aprobación de
la Cancillería”.

“Brindamos todo nuestro apoyo, solidaridad y compañerismo al pueblo
armenio y también al pueblo kurdo, porque nuestra Constitución
Política de Estado, que es la ley de leyes, dice no a la
discriminación, no a la violación de los derechos humanos y no al
genocidio”, agregó, en referencia al genocidio contra el pueblo
armenio perpetrado por el Estado turco entre 1915 y 1923.

El texto completo de la resolución dice:

“La Asamblea Legislativa Pluninacional de Bolivia comparte y es
solidaria con el pueblo armenio, por la lucha de sus reivindicaciones,
la conservación por los derechos humanos, y el establecimiento de la
verdad y la justicia.

Declara: su firme compromiso con los derechos humanos, la verdad y la
justicia y su solidaridad y condena contra toda política negacionista
respecto al genocidio y los crímenes de lesa humanidad sufridos por la
nación armenia”.

http://www.prensaarmenia.com.ar/2014/11/bolivia-aprueba-por-unanimidad-una.html

BAKU: Armenian journalist defends Leyla Yunus

Azeri-Press news agency (APA). Azerbaijan
November 28, 2014 Friday

Armenian journalist defends Leyla Yunus

Laura Baghdasaryan, one of the famous journalists of Armenia,
expressed concern over the reports about health problems of the
imprisoned human rights defender Leyla Yunus.

According to the Armenian media outlets, Baghdasaryan, in an open
letter, condemned the persecution of her 58yearold colleague.

Baghdasarian told RFE/RL she had chosen not to speak out for quite a
long time as she feared that support and sympathy from Yerevan would
only aggravate the situation of Yunus.

Leyla Yunus faced charges under articles #274, 178.3.2, 192.2.2
(illegal business), and her husband Arif Yunus 213.2.2 (evasion from
payment of taxes), 320.2 (falsification of official documents), #274
(state betray) and 178.3.2(fraud) of the Criminal Code.

On July 30, Leyla Yunus was sentenced to pretrial detention.