Armenia’s 20th Anniversary To Be Marked On Capitol Hill

ARMENIA’S 20TH ANNIVERSARY TO BE MARKED ON CAPITOL HILL

armradio.am
22.10.2011 13:31

Armenian Americans will join on Capitol Hill with the Congressional
Caucus on Armenian Issues on Tuesday, October 25th to celebrate the
20th anniversary of the Republic of Armenia’s rebirth as an independent
country, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).

The program will be held in the historic hearing room of the U.S.
House Foreign Affairs Committee, 2172 Rayburn House Office Building.

This room has been the setting for many watershed meetings on
Armenian issues, including the approval of a series of Armenian
Genocide Resolutions and, just this past July 20th, the adoption of
a Return of Churches amendment calling on Turkey to restore Christian
religious properties to their rightful owners.

The event is organized by the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues,
in coordination with the Embassy of the Republic of Armenia and
Armenian American organizations.

The Catholicos Of All Armenians Hosts The Minsk Group Co-Chairs At T

THE CATHOLICOS OF ALL ARMENIANS HOSTS THE MINSK GROUP CO-CHAIRS AT THE MOTHER SEE

armradio.am
22.10.2011 14:07

His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All
Armenian, received the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs and the Personal
Representative of the OSCE chairman-in-Office.

His Holiness appreciated the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group towards
the settlement of the Karabakh issue and establishment of peace in
the region. The Catholicos presented the involvement and contribution
of the Armenian Church to the establishment of an atmosphere of peace
and solidarity in the region.

His Holiness Karekin II informed the mediators about the meetings
between the religious leaders of Armenia, Russia, Georgia and
Azerbaijan, during which they call on the peoples of the region to
live in peace.

“We are optimistic, because there is no alternative to peace and
solidarity,” The Catholicos noted.

During the meeting the interlocutors exchanged views on the process
of peaceful settlement fo the Karabakh conflict.

L’Iran Renonce A Confier A La Russie Le Developpement D’Un Important

L’IRAN RENONCE A CONFIER A LA RUSSIE LE DEVELOPPEMENT D’UN IMPORTANT CHAMP PETROLIER
Stephane

armenews.com
samedi 22 octobre 2011

L’Iran a renonce a confier a la compagnie russe Gazprom le
developpement du champ petrolier d’Azar en raison des tergiversations
du groupe russe sur un contrat en negociation depuis 2009, selon le
PDG de la compagnie nationale petrolière iranienne NIOC.

Nous avons decide de cesser notre cooperation avec cette compagnie
et d’attribuer le contrat a des societes iraniennes, a declare Ahmad
Ghalebani, PDG de la NIOC, cite lundi par le quotidien economique
Donyaye Eghtesad.

Malheureusement le compagnie russe a tergiverse quant a ses engagements
vis a vis de l’Iran, a explique M. Ghalebani en precisant que la NIOC
a donne a plusieurs reprises des avertissements a cette compagnie
qui n’en a pas tenu compte.

Gazpromneft, filiale petrolière du geant rus Gazprom, avait signe en
novembre 2009 un accord de principe pour le developpement du gisement
petrolier d’Azar, decouvert en 2005 a la frontière irano-irakienne
au sud-ouest de l’Iran.

Ce gisement est evalue a quelque 2 milliards de barils, partages entre
l’Iran (40%) et l’Irak (60%) où Gazprom est egalement concessionnaire,
selon les experts petroliers.

Teheran a accuse a plusieurs reprises ces derniers mois Gazprom de
traîner les pieds pour signer l’accord final avec l’Iran, qui est
soumis a de sevères sanctions occidentales frappant notamment son
secteur petrolier et gazier.

Ces sanctions et les pressions americaines et europeennes pour empecher
tout investissement ou toute cooperation avec l’Iran ont entraîne le
depart depuis deux ans de la plupart des grands groupes petroliers
occidentaux, remplaces essentiellement par des entreprises chinoises
et iraniennes.

Les Etats-Unis ont multiplie les pressions sur les principaux
partenaires de l’Iran comme la Chine, la Russie, la Turquie ou les
Emirats arabes unis pour les convaincre de suivre les sanctions
occidentales, qui frappent egalement le secteur bancaire.

L’Iran est par ailleurs sous le coup de quatre trains de sanctions de
l’ONU contre ses programmes nucleaire et balistique et son industrie de
defense, la communaute internationale soupconnant Teheran de chercher,
en depit de ses dementis repetes, a se doter de l’arme atomique.

Appel D’Offres International Annonce Pour Choisir Un Operateur Pour

APPEL D’OFFRES INTERNATIONAL ANNONCE POUR CHOISIR UN OPERATEUR POUR GERER LA COLLECTE DES DECHETS D’EREVAN
Stephane

armenews.com
samedi 22 octobre 2011

Un appel d’offres international est annonce pour choisir un operateur
pour gerer la collecte des dechets d’Erevan a indique le service de
presse de la municipalite d’Erevan.

Karen Karapetyan, le maire de la ville, a demande aux maires de tous
les districts de la capitale de l’Armenie pour sceller des contrats
avec les particuliers et les entreprises pour collecter des ordures
et accorder une attention particulière aux frais pour la collecte
des ordures.

Le maire a egalement demande aux administrations des districts de
coller environ 8.000 affiches sur les murs a l’entree des immeubles.

Ces affiches seront la pour rappeler aux residents les droits des
coproprietes et leurs devoirs.

L’Armenie 46ame Au Classement De La FIFA

L’ARMENIE 46AME AU CLASSEMENT DE LA FIFA
Krikor Amirzayan

armenews.com
samedi 22 octobre 2011

La FIFA vient de publier son dernier classement des selections
nationales. L’Armenie avec 608 points est 46ème. Après sa victoire
sur la Macedoine (4-1) a Erevan et sa defaite (1-2) contre l’Irlande a
Dublin, l’Armenie perdu deux rangs. Le mois dernier l’equipe d’Armenie
etait 44ème au classement de la FIFA, son meilleur classement depuis
la fondation de la Federation armenienne de football. Dans les dix
premières equipes mondiales nous trouvons l’Espagne, les Pays-Bas,
l’Allemagne, l’Uruguay, le Bresil, l’Italie, l’Angleterre, la Grèce,
le Portugal et l’Argentine. L’Armenie est devant la Georgie et
l’Azerbaïdjan.

BAKU: Military Doctrine Of The Republic Of Azerbaijan – Analyse

MILITARY DOCTRINE OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN – ANALYSE

Milaz.info

Oct 21 2011
Azerbaijan

South Caucasus and Caspian Sea region being a sensitive and
complicated area from the geo-political, geo-strategic, geo-economic
and geo-cultural point of view, open for foreign influences in a great
extent. Military doctrines of regional countries and their defense
and military policies implemented based on these doctrines also play
significant role in establishment and development of regional peace
and stability, as well as on the contrary in violation of stability,
in creation of tension and confrontations, crisis and conflicts in
the whole region.

Military doctrine being an officially announced system of views in
state’s military security field. determines political-military,
political-strategic and political-economic basis of its military
security, including the directions of combat preparation of state
and armed force, methods and forms of its implementation.

The provisions of military doctrine of every state may alter depending
on thorough change of military security environment, military-political
situation, as well as on internal political development and radical
changes regarding strategic choice. In this regard, revision and
update of military doctrine from time to time is expectable. In order
to evaluate influence of military doctrinal views on establishment
of peace and stability, development of freedom and democracy, people
welfare integration in South Caucasus, first of all military doctrines’
of the region countries (Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan), as well as
military doctrines of Russia, Iran and Turkey, which have traditional
interests in the region should be studies and evaluated in this regard.

The Center of Military Analyses and Research has prepared the document
“Military doctrines of regional countries – stability or the threat
of confrontation?” by support Open Society Institute – Assistance
Foundation. Today we publish the Military Doctrine of the Republic
of Azerbaijan.

Military Doctrine of the Republic of Azerbaijan

Azerbaijani Republic (AR) is only state, which did not make its
strategic choice in the region. Although AR proclaimed its main target
to Euro-Atlantic integration in its military security concept adopted
in 2007, together with not transition to democracy, it also has not
announced target to become a member of neither NATO, not EU yet.

Azerbaijani hesitations regarding strategic choice are also reflected
its Military Doctrine (after this, it will be called “Military
doctrine”), adopted in a hurry without any public and parliament
discussions.

Military doctrine “analyzes conditions, processes and factors creating
threats and preventing implementation of security environment and
national interests of Azerbaijani Republic (the article 1.5), as
well as bases on the principle of necessary and efficient defense”
(the article 1.7).

Analyze of existed state of regional security environment, including
security environment of Azerbaijan:

– its gradual complication and aggravation, especially after Georgia
crisis in 2008, its becoming more complicated and aggravated;

– increase and strengthening of military existence and participation
of Russia in the region, which is political-military ally of aggressor
Armenia, at the same time it is the leader of regional military block
– CSTO;

– arming of Armenia, defense of its land and air borders by Russia

– Continuation of Dagliq Qarabag conflict, war situation between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, increase of violation of ceasefire;

– Continuation of instability in S. Caucasus, RF gathering of armed
forces in this region under the name of fight against terrorism;
– violation of its naval and air borders by Iran Islam Republic’s
(IIR), which is its south neighbor, pursue militarist policy, steadily
develops missile and nuclear programs;

on the other hand, Azerbaijan, which although being in war, has no
military-political ally, is not a member of any military block, has
weak, undeveloped strategic and military potential and unable to settle
sharp military security problems since restoration of its independency.

Azerbaijan’s pursued policy in this field openly demonstrates not
answering to the indicated below provisions of its military doctrine.

This situation does not give an opportunity to balance the sharply
violated regional strategic and military-strategic state, to create
efficient situation for settlement of the conflicts, as well as to
improve security environment.

Strategic hesitations of Azerbaijani Republic, which is in the border
with authoritarian Russia in the north, authoritarian Armenia in
the west, totalitarian Iran in the south, despite announcing about
the choice of democratic way of development, its taking opposite way
acting in the same line of policy together with authoritarian regimes
instead of being in the same way with its natural allies, democratic
Turkey and Georgia, on the one hand, have a negative influence on
development of democracy and security in the region, on the other
hand, it does not meet the requirements of the article 2.10 (security
environment of the Republic of Azerbaijan is determined with various
interrelated factors in present existed global and regional levels
and in future factors which may be emerged) of its military doctrine.

Strategic hesitations of AR in its military doctrine on the one hand,
does not give an opportunity to get sufficient strategic potential, on
the other hand, not only demonstrate disloyalty to all sides, as well
as opens a way to doubtful attitude of its natural, potential allies.

This situation, of course, also does not serve to strengthening of
regional peace and stability, security.

It is stated in the article 2.14 of MD that, “Occupation of some
part of the territory of Azerbaijani Republic by Armenian Republic,
carrying out of ethnic cleansing policy in the regions of Armenia,
where Azerbaijanis lived before and continuation of aggressor action
resulted with destruction of economic and social infrastructure are
the main factor having negative influence on national security of
Azerbaijani Republic”.

In the article 2.16 of the document is truly noted that, “Occupied
territories’ by Armenian Republic temporarily remaining out of the
control of government bodies of Azerbaijani Republic damages not
only on national security, but have a serious negative influence of
regional security as well. This situation become worse as a result
of inefficiency of international union’s efforts in the settlement
of the problem”.

The provision regarding “continuation of stirring up the separatist
tendencies in different regions of Azerbaijan by separate forces”
is also reflected in the article 2.17 of MD. Certainly, though it is
not openly noted here, but considering of RF and IIR together with
Armenia is apparent.

>From these indicated reasons, Armenian Republic’s noting as one of the
main foreign factors having negative influence on national security
of Azerbaijani Republic may be considered right from the viewpoint
of enumerating of open and direct foreign threats. However, if to
take into consideration, Russian role both in creation of conflicts
and their managing, support of Armenian separatism, or in arming
of aggressor Armenia and its throughout support, at the same time
the scale of its negative influence on strategic development of the
region, including Azerbaijan, it is the main factor with deep strategic
character having a negative influence on national and military security
of Azerbaijani Republic. Regarding this, even mentioning of RF among
the foreign threats for any reason is one of the main problems in views
system of official Baku in military security field and demonstrates
strategic uncertainty of its political elite once more.

In the article 2.18 of MD, it is noted among “the other various foreign
factors complex having a direct or possible influence on national
security of the Republic of Azerbaijan” that, ….significance and the
role of military power in international relations, in implementation
of political and economic interests increases distinctly”. In the
article 3.2 of the document among the military and political threats:

“-violation of regional military balance and going beyond the defense
proficiency, including creation of military bases in the region or
directly near the state borders and water territories of Azerbaijani
Republic, gathering of army groups, increase of weapons and other
military participation;

– violation of Azerbaijani Republic’s state borders by military units
and armed groups, intensification of border debates or conflicts
take place.

However, if to take into account, coming of open and potential
foreign threats as well as military threats directed to Azerbaijan
mainly from RF, Iran and aggressor Armenia, it is not reflected the
ways of neutralization of this complex of foreign factors in the
military doctrine. This is an approach with negative effect not only
on stability and security of Azerbaijan, its long-term development,
but as a whole of the region.

According to the 4.25 article of MD, defense policy of Azerbaijani
Republic with the purpose of military security guarantee of the state,
is formed on the basis of military, political, economic and social
measures and serves to creation of efficient internal and foreign
conditions for implementation of national interests of Azerbaijani
Republic.

Creation of efficient internal and foreign condition in the modern
world, especially in Euro-Atlantic space, to which Azerbaijan intends
to integrate (according to National Security Concept) first of all,
is implemented by the way of democratic development, democratic
reforms and as it is noted in the article 4.26 of that document,
“carrying out of non-military measures – establishment, development
and strengthening of friendship, partnership or alliance relations
with neighbor and other countries”.

It is noted in the MD that “Defense policy basis on system analysis
of military-political condition in the region and its development
tendencies, evaluation of real and potential military threats complex
against (directed – author) Azerbaijani Republic and in order to
guarantee military security takes into consideration objective demands
and real opportunities, including the country’s geographic position
and territorial landscape” (article 4.27).

The present security and foreign policy of AR, including foreign
military policy, the character of its relations with natural and
potential allies (first of all, Turkey, Georgia, U.S., NATO and EU)
together with not meeting the below indicated provisions of MD and
its national interests, also does not serve to the regional stability,
security and democracy development.

According to the article 4.29 of MD, “Azerbaijani Republic does not
allow placing of foreign military bases within its territory, except
the cases stipulated in the international treaties, which it supports.

However in case of fundamental changes in military-political
conditions, Azerbaijani Republic has a right to place foreign military
bases within its territory or temporarily to allow foreign military
participation in other form”.

After the Georgian crisis (2008) and 25-years extension of contract
term (2010) of military base placed in Armenia by Russia, although
this fundamental alteration made in AR MD opened the way of necessary
steps in the direction of creation of military-political balance in
the region, not implementation of these steps until today increase
concerns in front of growing threats. We should also note that
even concluding of treaty about “Strategic partnership and mutual
assistance” (2010) between AR and Turkey, did not have a significant
effect on the actual situation.

According to the article 5.42 of MD, “committing of aggression against
Azerbaijan by any state (excluding Armenian Republic) at the current
stage is in the low level”.

Azerbaijan’s being in war situation with Armenia, which is
military-political ally of RF, easy potential of again stirring
up the conflict, Russian military aggression against Georgia
under the pretext of regional conflict in 2008 and as a whole,
increase and reinforcement of its military presence in S. Caucasus,
as well as despite of all international community calling, Iranian
development of its nuclear program and in the case of aggravation
of military-political situation in the region and around the region
because of rapidly spreading of national movement started in Muslim
world, assessment of less probability level of military threat coming
from Russia is a serious military-political mistake. This situation
is a serious threat not only for Azerbaijan, but also as a whole for
regional stability and security.

By the way, the same mistaken assessment cost very expensive for
neighbor Georgia. It was necessary to get lesson from this for
Azerbaijan as well without wasting time.

The Center of Military Analyses and Research

http://milaz.info/en/news.php?id=6544

RA NA President Receives The Delegation Of The Italian Senate

RA NA PRESIDENT RECEIVES THE DELEGATION OF THE ITALIAN SENATE

National Assembly of RA

Oct 21 2011
Armenia

On October 21 the RA NA President Hovik Abrahamyan received the
delegation of the Committee on Political Affairs of the European Union
of the Italian Senate, led by the Committee Chairperson Ms. Rossana
Boldi, which arrived in Armenia on three-day working visit. The members
of the Committee, the Chairperson of the Italy-Armenia Friendship
Group Albertina Soliani and De Eccher Christiano are in the delegation.

Welcoming the Italian senators the NA President has noted that he
is glad to greet the parliamentarians of the friendly country, with
which Armenia shares centuries-old history, Christian and cultural
common heritage. In his conviction, the Italian parliamentarians’
visit to Armenia will promote the activation of cooperation between
the two countries. Touching upon the relations of the two countries
Hovik Abrahamyan has noted that the Armenian-Italian cooperation in
the political, economic, cultural spheres has good perspectives of
development. From the view of boosting bilateral political dialogue
the NA President has highlighted the Armenian-Italian high-ranking
mutual visits. In his word, with respect to more efficient development
the Armenian-Italian inter-parliamentary relations it is necessary
to use all the possible dimensions of cooperation. Hovik Abrahamyan
considered important to make regular such visits in order to make
closer the relations between the two countries, which will contribute
to the exchange of information, discussion of themes on common
interest and formation of united position in different parliamentary
assemblies. Taking the advantage the NA President Hovik Abrahamyan
congratulated the guests on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of
the Unification of Italy.

Expressing her gratitude for warm reception Rossana Boldi, Committee
Chairperson on Political Affairs of the European Union of the Italian
Senate, has mentioned that such visits boost the Armenian-Italian
cooperation and promote the advancement of the inter-parliamentary
relations.

“I visit Armenia for the first time, but I am sure that I’ll come
again,” the senator said. She also emphasized their visit in the
context of integrating Armenia into Europe , particularly, on the
margins of the “New Neighborhood Policy” and “Eastern Partnership.”

She has agreed the NA President’s observation that the contacts with
different dimensions are necessary, and they promote the deepening
of friendship between the two countries and peoples.

The Chairperson of the Italy-Armenia Friendship Group, senators
Albertina Soliani and De Eccher Christiano also emphasized the
inter-parliamentary mutual visits, the cooperation of the friendship
groups, as well as the activation of relations in economic, cultural
and scientific-educational spheres. They congratulated the NA President
on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the RA independence and
stated that during this period Armenia had had big progress.

At the end of the meeting the NA President Hovik Abrahamyan asked Ms.
Boldi to convey his invitation to the President of Senate to visit
Armenia on an official visit.

www.parliament.am

Azerbaijan’s Free Speech Is A PR Myth

AZERBAIJAN’S FREE SPEECH IS A PR MYTH
Mary Fitzgerald

guardian.co.uk
Friday 21 October 2011 17.09 BST

The Eurovision victory as a harbinger of new tolerance and social
reform? The truth is not so convenient for the west

Azerbaijan win this year’s Eurovision song contest. Azerbaijan won
this year’s Eurovision song contest. Photograph: John MacDougall

When the invite to the Azerbaijani reception at Westminster City Hall
arrived, and I saw that top of the bill was Ell and Nikki, the pop
duo who romped to victory at this year’s Eurovision song contest,
I figured, why not?

Many of the Azerbaijani elite in attendance that night had much more
than Eurovision glory to celebrate. Speaking ahead of the concert,
the ambassador recalled how, when his country won its independence
from the Soviet Union 20 years ago, he would not have believed it
could come as far as it has – indeed, that it would be independent
at all. Nestled between some of the world’s most imposing neighbours
– Russia to the north and Iran to the south, with Armenia to the
west and a chunk of hotly, often violently, disputed territory,
Nagorno-Karabakh, lying between the two nations – few would have
rated Azerbaijan’s chances of survival too highly back in 1991.

But survive it has – and as a secular state, despite an 85% Shia
majority and Iran pumping propaganda into its airwaves across the
southern border. Also, as much as possible, with an independent
foreign policy, despite Russia breathing down its neck from the
north. The former Soviet Republic has forged closer links with Europe
and the west, and is now a member of the UN, the Council of Europe,
the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe and Nato’s
Partnership for Peace Program. Thanks to a healthy endowment of oil
and gas, its economy is booming despite the global recession. On
one of the thoroughfares into the capital, Baku, a sign proclaims:
“Democracy is our path.”

Except that the last part – even in the most generous analysis –
is not entirely true. The country has embarked on a major PR drive
to sell a story of promise and growth: one that appeals easily to
European business, eager to strike lucrative oil and gas contracts,
and to European politicians seeking energy security in the face of
resurgent Russia, and unfriendly or unstable regimes in many of its
satellites. Representatives from both camps were out in force at
Westminster City Hall on Wednesday night: “friends” in the region
come at a premium these days.

But the facts are these: the country’s president, Ilham Aliyev, is
the son of the country’s last president, Heydar Aliyev; the family
has ruled Azerbaijan since a coup in 1993. President Aliyev doesn’t
even bother with the formalities of switching to prime minister for
a term, as his neighbour, Vladimir Putin, chose to. In 2009, the
two-term limit on the presidency was lifted via a referendum, which
he won comfortably. International observers have been critical of
all the elections held since independence; opposition demonstrations
have repeatedly been met with police violence, and there have been
widespread allegations of torture and ill-treatment in custody.

Apologists for the regime – and I met many that night – will tell you
that the last presidential election was not “quite as bad” as the ones
preceding it. The evidence supports this – yet all have been marred
by violence, intimidation, allegations of fraud and suppression of
dissent. Last year, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) reported that
journalists and bloggers “work in a climate of endemic impunity and
under persistent pressure from the authorities”. A number of activists
are currently staging a hunger strike in protest at the harsh sentences
meted out to opposition activists involved in a quashed demonstration
in April this year.

It’s embarrassing, to say the least, for those who want to befriend
this energy-rich republic. Responding to the April incident, the
European parliament’s president Jerzy Buzek called for the release of
all political prisoners in Azerbaijan, and stressed that Azerbaijan’s
relationship with the EU “would become even stronger with more progress
on human rights and political freedoms”.

The logic behind this carefully worded censure is the same that guides
“uncomfortable” but strategic relationships the world over: the carrot
is better than the stick. Hold out the carrot of friendship with
Europe and liberalisation will follow, so the argument goes. Fraser
Nelson even seems to think that the Eurovision victory will spark some
sort of outpouring of tolerance and social reform. (In the meantime,
of course, we can all carry on doing business as usual.)

You don’t need to look far to see how short-sighted this is: the
post-Soviet states Ukraine and Belarus provide ready examples. It’s
true that the Azerbaijani regime’s record is not quite as stained as
some others in the region. As one insider put it, it’s not like they’ve
not had a “year zero” like Turkmenistan. But to use such levels of
depravity as a yardstick against which to measure anything is, well,
depraved. We cannot be blind to what is happening in Azerbaijan simply
because it suits us. History shows that such strategies often end
badly for western powers, too.

We should judge all purported “democracies” by the same standards – and
this includes our own. This week the British government moved to ban
the legal principle that exposed British collusion in torture of “war
on terror” detainees. Also this week, in Prospect, Geoffrey Robertson
points to the danger posed by the upcoming Leveson inquiry into media
standards. Many British politicians, sensing an opportunity in the
wake of the phone-hacking scandal, have called for statutory laws to
curb the powers of the press. This would be a disaster for freedom of
speech. As Robinson writes: “Journalism is not a profession. It is the
exercise, by occupation, of the right to free expression available
to every citizen.” Azerbaijanis do not have this right. We must be
vigilant in protecting our own.

Atom Egoyan Takes Post At Ryerson University

ATOM EGOYAN TAKES POST AT RYERSON UNIVERSITY

AZG DAILY
21-10-2011

Canadian director (of Armenian origin) Atom Egoyan works with students
at Ryerson’s faculty of communication and design after being appointed
as a distinguished scholar in residence at the Toronto university.

The director of The Sweet Hereafter and Adoration mentors film students
after accepting the role for the 2011-12 academic year.

Egoyan also participates in a discussion series and a public
retrospective of his work at Ryerson.

Selected students work with Egoyan as he prepares for the North
American premiere production of Martin Crimp’s Cruel and Tender for the
Canadian Stage theatre company. Egoyan has directed productions in both
opera and theatre, including Salome for the Canadian Opera Company.

Ryerson provost Alan Shepard said students would benefit from the
opportunity to learn from a master of film and performance arts.

Egoyan is notable for continuing to make films in Canada, despite
achieving international recognition.

Egoyan was nominated for writing and directing Oscars for The Sweet
Hereafter and earned Genie Awards for Where the Truth Lies, Ararat,
Exotica and Felicia’s Journey.

A University of Toronto alumnus, he praised Ryerson in a statement
for encouraging “expression and creativity” in its students.

Energy Ministry: Nobody Dismissed From Armenian Nuclear Power Plant

ENERGY MINISTRY: NOBODY DISMISSED FROM ARMENIAN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

/ARKA/
October 21, 2011
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, October 21. /ARKA/. Not a single employee of Armenian Nuclear
Power Plant in Metsamor has been dismissed since 158 workers and
engineers unhappy about their salaries submitted their resignations
on September 20, Lusine Harutyunyan, press secretary of energy and
natural resources ministry, said on Thursday.

Earlier, a source from the nuclear plant told ARKA New Agency that
the plant’s administration has declined the workers’ request to raise
their salaries and dismissed the revolted workers.

According to Orakarg newspaper, 40 evening shift workers have already
returned their passes.

“Nobody has been dismissed and no decision has been made,” Harutyunyan
said.

She said that regular repair is under way now at the nuclear power
plant. The plant, she said will resume operating on October 27 upon
completion of the repair.

Reports in Armenian media in late September said the re-launch of the
palnt was under threat after 158 staff members submitted resignation
applications demanding an increase in their wages.

The Armenian Nuclear Power Plant, the only nuclear power plant in the
Sourth Caucasus, which accounts for about 40 percent of Armenia’s
electricity, is located in Metsamor, some 30 kilometers west of
Yerevan.

The plant was launched in 1997. Now only the second, 107.5-megawatt
unit of the plant operates. It generates about 50% of the country’s
electricity.

The plant’s financial flows have been managed since 2003 by Russian
Inter RAO UES, owned by Russian Rosatom.