ISTANBUL: A dark episode in Turkish history

Hurriyet, Turkey
Nov 22 2011

A dark episode in Turkish history

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

These days, the Turkish media is full of discussions about `what
really happened’ in Dersim in 1937 ` an eastern province in which a
`rebellion’ was brutally crushed. The victims, whose numbers exceed
10,000 and included many women and children, are remembered with
grief. Now Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the ever-venerated and
never-questioned `father of all Turks,’ is getting the questioning he
deserves for the first time.

Dersim, a tribal province of Alevi Kurds, was a `lawless’ region even
under the Ottomans, who did not interfere in the affairs of the local
communities unless they created big problems for the center. The
Turkish Republic that was founded in 1923, however, had its own
version of the `mission civilisatrice,’ or the self-declared right to
tame `uncivilized’ peoples. Therefore, tension emerged in the 1930s
between the tribes of the region and the government in Ankara, which
wanted to impose `law and order,’ including, of course, taxes.

Word has it that the first spark that lit the violence was the attempt
of a Turkish officer to rape the beautiful wife of a local chieftain
in March 1937. The chieftain killed the soldier, fled to the mountains
to avoid the army backlash and burned a bridge that was recently built
by the government for apparent military purposes. This incident was
regarded by Ankara as the beginning of a rebellion. Large numbers of
troops were deployed to the region, turning Dersim into a war zone.

In the following months, the city and the surrounding mountains turned
into a huge occupied territory, where the soldiers killed not just
armed rebels but also many non-combatants. War planes dropped bombs on
the population, and even poisonous gas was used. In his memoirs, the
late İhsan Sabri Ã?aÄ?layangil, a former prime minister, wrote that
people who fled into caves were `gassed like rats.’

In brief, what happened in Dersim in 1937 is a perfect example of
`state terrorism’ against a disobedient population. The closest
parallel I have in mind is the mass murder in Hama perpetrated in 1982
by the tyranny of Hafez al-Assad ` the father of Syria’s current
tyrant. It is a horrendous episode that we Turks should be ashamed of.

But those who deserve the most shame are the ones who have knowingly
hidden the responsibility of the masterminds of the massacre: For
decades, they have said Atatürk was `unaware’ of the operation against
Dersim as he was `too ill’ at the time.

Indeed, not just the perpetrators but the tragedy itself has been
whitewashed. Today, you can’t find the word Dersim on any Turkish map,
for the province was renamed by law as `Tunceli.’ And when you use
Istanbul’s second airport named after Sabiha Gökçen, the adopted
daughter of Atatürk, you can read on a plate that she was `Turkey’s
first female war pilot.’ They just don’t tell you that she had tested
her bombing skills on nowhere other than Dersim.

But facts can’t be hidden forever, and we owe their current resurgence
to an outlier in the arch-Kemalist CHP, or the Republican People’s
Party’s Hüseyin Aygün, a deputy from Tunceli, who dared to expose that
the emperor has no clothes. `It is impossible to think that Atatürk
was unaware of Dersim,’ Aygün said. `Atatürk must be held
responsible.’

It took only a few days for prominent members of his party to protest
Aygün, and for his party’s central committee to ask for his `defense.’
I will not be surprised if he gets excommunicated ` the CHP is a party
of Kemalist dogma, not reason.

But the genie is out of the bottle. Daily Radikal has published
various documents and photos showing that Atatürk ordered and oversaw
the whole `operation.’ In just a few days, millions have realized that
the history of our Republic is much less clean than they used to
believe.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Anti-trust commission to fine fake butter dealers

Anti-trust commission to fine fake butter dealers

15:31 – 21.11.11

The Commission for Protection of Economic Competition has imposed a
fine on several companies which were recently found to have breached
competition rules by importing and selling cream spread instead of
butter.

The fake butter dealers will have to pay 30 million Drams (about
$78,000) for cheating consumers by offering a higher price for a
cheaper product.

Inspections revealed that such companies as Bio Food, Brand Leader,
Kartel Anna, Felix Sarg and Ardis managed to realize their imported
cream spread as butter. The Commission also uncovered cases when
supermarkets themselves cheated consumers, having officially purchased
spread from suppliers and sold it as butter. Those companies included
Alex Grig, SAS Group, Star Divide, Fresh and Nor Zovq.

Most of the companies admitted the violations, promising to rule out
the repetition of such cases in future.

The Commission’s monitoring has revealed the companies no longer break
the competition rules.

The entire package of the inspections will be sent to the Ministry of
Agriculture and the Sate Food Security Service.

Tert.am

BAKU: L’Arménie cherche à occuper des terres turques et géorgiennes

AZERBAIDJAN
« L’Arménie cherche à occuper des terres turques et géorgiennes »
affirme un politicien azéri

« L’Arménie cherche à occuper non seulement des terres azéries mais
aussi turques et géorgiennes » a affirmé Ziyafat Asgarov premier
vice-président du parlement azéri ( Majlis Milli).

« L’Arménie a très tôt cherché à occuper les terres des autres et
aujourd’hui elle continue ces déclarations guerrières non seulement
pour occuper des terres azéries mais aussi turques et géorgiennes »
a-t-il dit.

Il a toutefois noté que le peuple arménien veut rendre ces terres à
l’Azerbaïdjan.

« Tôt ou tard l’Arménie acceptera le fait que le Karabakh appartient à
l’Azerbaïdjan et qu’il est nécessaire de le rendre. Le peuple de
l’Arménie le souhaite aussi. La preuve est la situation que des
millions de citoyens arméniens quittent leur pays frappé par la famine
et le chaos » a dit M. Asgarov.

Selon le vice-président le conflit du Nagorno Karabakh sera réglé dans
le cadre de l’intégrité territoriale de l’Azerbaïdjan.

« Le gouvernement arménien doit prendre une décision en lien avec le
règlement du conflit et accepter le fait que l’Azerbaïdjan est un
leader régional dans tous les paramètres incluant politiques,
économiques et militaires » a dit le vice-président du Majlis Milli.

mardi 22 novembre 2011,
Stéphane ©armenews.com

L’Iran et l’Arménie toujours en contact

ARMENIE
L’Iran et l’Arménie toujours en contact

Les présidents arménien et iranien ont eu un entretien téléphonique le
18 novembre, au cours duquel ils ont réaffirmé la nécessité de
renforcer les liens entre leurs pays et de developper le plus possible
leurs relations bilatérales. Lors de cet entretien, le président
iranien Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a fait savoir à son homologue arménien
Serge Sarkissian qu’il y avait un terreau fertile pour le
développement dans nombre de domaines des liens et de la coopération
entre Téhéran et Erevan. `La République islamique d’Iran salue le
renforcement continu des relations entre les deux pays, dans
différents domaines, culturel, économique et politique et encourage
toute initiative en ce sens », aurait déclaré M.Ahmadinejad. Ce
dernier a aussi exalté les ‘relations historiques et culturelles »
entre les deux pays, en indiquant que les « peuples iranien et
arménien sont liés par une sincère estime réciproque » et que ` cela a
créé les conditions d’un renforcement des liens entre les deux pays’.
`L’Arménie cherche à developer les relations entre les deux pays dans
différents domaines, spécialement l’économie, et estime que des liens
étroits avec Téhéran servent les intérêts des deux nations et des
autres nations de la région’, a indiqué de son côté M.Sarkissian. Le
président iranien devrait effectuer une visite officielle à Erevan
avant la fin de l’année. Selon le service de presse de la présidence
arménienne, les modalités pratiques de cette visite ont été aussi au
centre de la discussion entre les deux chefs d’Etat. Au début du mois,
le directeur-général du service des affaires internationales de la
présidence iranienne avait fait savoir que le président Ahmadinejad
visiterait dans un proche avenir l’Arménie. La dernière visite du
président iranien en Arménie remonte à octobre 2007.M. Ahmadinejad
avait à cette occasion rencontré des universitaires et des étudiants
ainsi que des représentants de la communauté iranienne en Arménie, et
avait signé quatre accords de coopération avec l’Arménie. Durant sa
visite, il avait été aussi honoré du titre de doctor honoris causa par
l’Université de Erevan. Pour des raisons qui n’ont pas été clarifiées,
M. Ahmadinejad avait différé la visite qu’il devait effectuer en
Arménie il y a quelques mois. Le président Sarkissian visitait pour sa
part Téhéran en mars dernier, au moment où le pays célébrait le nouvel
an iranien.

mardi 22 novembre 2011,
Gari ©armenews.com

Maxime Verner-Krekdjian candidat aux élections présidentielles

Maxime Verner-Krekdjian candidat aux élections présidentielles

Jean Eckian / Paris
armenews.com
PRÉSIDENTIELLES FRANÇAISES
Des nouvelles de Maxime Verner-Krekdjian

Alors qu’une enquête Ipsos-Le Monde, publiée mercredi, indique que les
jeunes sont, égoïstes à 63%, paresseux pour 53%, intolérents (53%) et
pas assez engagés politiquement, le candidat de la jeunesse, Maxime
Verner, 22 ans, fait le pari d’inverser la donne, au moins sur le
dernier point en étant son porte-parole et en lui donnant tout
simplement la parole. Ce que ne font pas les autres candidats, selon
lui.

D’origine arménienne par sa mère, Maxime Verner-Krekdjian, est
candidat aux élections présidentielles en France.

Il donnait hier une conférence de presse à l’Assemblée nationale,
hébergé au 4ème bureau par Jean-Christophe Lagarde (Nouveau Centre),
où étaient réunis une trentaine de jeunes journalistes de la presse
écrite et des télévisions.

Première nouvelle, le postulant a d’ores et déjà collecté 203
parrainages sur les 500 signatures nécessaires au dépôt de candidature
à l’élection présidentielle.

Pour indication, Jean-Pierre Chevènement a recueilli à ce jour 250
signatures, Marine Le Pen 118 et Christine Boutin la centaine.

Seconde information, il estime que pour réaliser un programme en 12
mesures «pour une jeunesse intégrée et créatrice», l’investissement
serait de l’ordre de 4 milliards d’euros, financés pour 2,8 milliards
par des acteurs public et 1,2 milliards par des acteurs privés.

Troisième point, Maxime Verner compte absolument se confronter
publiquement à Marine Le Pen aux fins de la pousser dans ses
retranchements, estimant que «son programme est vide» et simple à
démonter. Ces dernières semaines, il a visité les dix départements où
le Front national est le plus implanté pour déconstruire le discours
du Front national et initier un mouvement de résistance aux idées
défendues par Marine Le Pen.

Son crédo «Toucher du doigt le réel et rendre la confiance, l’espoir,
la foi en la France, notre chance commune»

C’est ce qu’il fait depuis déjà trois ans, après s’être présenté aux
municipales de 2008 à Bron (Rhône) et revendiqué la paternité de la
loi du 14 avril 2011, abaissant l’ge d’éligibilité des députés, de 23
à 18 ans, et de 30 ans à 24 ans pour les sénateurs.

Il faut dire également qu’il mouille la chemise en parcourant la
France à la rencontre des jeunes et des élus de la République afin de
recueillir les fameuses 500 signatures provenant d’au moins 50
départements.

Rappelons que Maxime, issu de la classe moyenne, ne vit actuellement
qu’avec un peu plus de 700 euros par mois, logé dans une chambre de
bonne. C’est grce à l’aide du réseau de son Association des Jeunes de
France qu’il peut faire campagne.

Ses

12 mesures pour la Jeunesse

1 – Nommer un ministre auprès du Premier ministre, chargé de la jeunesse

2 – Installer un Comité pour la consultation de la jeunesse

3 – Créer une Fondation de la mobilité, organisant le permis gratuit
pour les jeunes majeurs

4 – Supprimer le redoublement au collège et le remplacr par des
classes soutenues par des programmes d’école ouvertes

5 – Installer un guichet unique de l’orientation

6 – Créer les carnets d’autonomie en première année universitaire

7 – Améliorer la condition des jeunes étudiants stagiaires en
instaurant un baromètre national de rémunération

8 – Lancer un programme national d’éducation à la santé, de la
maternelle à l’université

9 – Renforcer l’ouverture de logements sociaux sous la forme de
résidences intergénérationnelles

10 – Suivre un service civique d’un mois rétribué, avant ses 25 ans

11 – Mettre en place une éducation civique plus concrète et complète

12 – Ouvrir des écoles de l’entrepreneuriat social, dans les
universités et les grandes écoles

Si sa candidature prenait officiellement effet, l’étudiant à la
Sorbonne se dit persuadé d’obtenir au moins 5% des suffrages exprimés
au premier tour. Ce qui lui permettrait de peser dans la balance. S’il
n’atteint pas le seuil des 5%, il sera remboursé de ses frais de
campagne à hauteur d’un maximum de 808 000 euros.

vendredi 25 novembre 2011,
Jean Eckian©armenews.com

Russia’s Fruitless Efforts

Russia’s Fruitless Efforts

Igor Muradyan
Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 22:02:31 – 26/11/2011

Russia is facing the bitter reality – Turkey is keeping a distance from
Russia to please the United States. Ankara makes no statements, the Turkish
media prefer not to comment on this circumstance. Certainly, turkey will
try to maneuver within the permitted scope and hopes to get more than
appears possible in this stage.

Turkey views Russia as a possible partner which is always ready to hug any
Turkish proposal, and Turkey has reason for that. It should be noted that
Turkey did not get from the relations with Russia what it needed because
Moscow demanded more accessible guarantees for future but the notion of
`future’ does not fit the Turkish foreign policy.

Turkish politicians are trying to avoid so-called long-term strategic
relations with the great powers because they have no vision of their own
future, even the nearest future. For the Turks it is important to keep the
freedom of foreign political maneuvers, which is considered as a basic
principle of Turkey’s multifaceted goals.

However, Russia cannot afford to build relations on short-term agreements
with Turkey and other states, especially if energy infrastructures and
supplies are concerned.

Such a mode of relations, in which long-term goals are considered primary,
favors the United States because the U.S. policy has a global nature, and
long-term commitments may not favor the Americans.

The United States built and conducts a situational policy on Turkey,
considering that even if Turkey desires independence, it cannot survive
without the assistance and support of the United States, NATO,
international financial organizations.

At the same time, Russia takes steps which are intended not to let Turkey
go to farther. For this purpose, Russia uses intellectual resources,
organizes conferences and forums where the idea of archaism of certain
visions is expressed always, connected with the historical stereotypes, and
first of all the issues of Armenia are taken into account.

In the relations with Turkey, Russia continues to use the `Armenian
resource’ to `hand over’ the interests of Armenia, this is beyond doubt.
This task was assigned not only to some centers in Moscow but also the
Russian embassies in those regions where problems may occur in regard to
the activities of Armenians.

There are signs that in parallel with the relations with Turkey the reason
for such a position of Russia is the `new’ foreign policy which is aimed at
getting certain partners in the West.

It is obvious that Russia is taking steps to put strong pressure on Armenia
using political and economic levers. Moscow thinks that they will hardly be
able to pressure Armenia regarding the elections, which seems to be
insulting for the Russians. It irritates the Russians.

What is the way out? Perhaps, the pursuit of the `new’ policy.

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics24336.html

Chess: Armenia’s Aronian Sole Leader In Tal Memorial

ARMENIA’S ARONIAN SOLE LEADER IN TAL MEMORIAL

news.am
Nov 24 2011
Armenia

MOSCOW. – Levon Aronian won Peter Svidler at the 8th round of Mikhail
Tal Memorial tournament in Moscow. Aronian is the sole leader with
5 points. The other matches ended in a draw.

The 8th round

Anand – Nakamura 0.5:0.5

Aronian – Svidler 1:0.5

Carlsen – Nepomniachtchi 0.5:0.5

Ivanchuk – Gelfand 0.5:0.5

Kramnik – Karjakin 0.5:0.5

1. Aronian 5

2. Carlsen 4.5

3. Nepomniachtchi 4.5

4. Karjakin 4.5

5. Ivanchuk 4.5

6. Anand 4

7. Svidler 4

8. Kramnik 3.5

9. Nakamura 3

10. Gelfand 3

BAKU: ‘Armenian Armed Forces Drive Azerbaijani Population Out Of Geo

‘ARMENIAN ARMED FORCES DRIVE AZERBAIJANI POPULATION OUT OF GEORGIA’

news.az
Nov 24 2011
Azerbaijan

News.Az interviews head of the Human Rights Monitoring Group of
National Minorities, human rights activist Elbrus Mammadov.

The activity of MRMG&TOLERANCE is known in Georgia and beyond its
bounds, Council of Europe and UN use and adopt resolutions on the
basis of documents and reports of your organization. What are the
main directions in the activity of this organization?

The main directions in protection of interests of national
minorities, provision of their legal assistance, consultations, as
well as preparation of reports about negative facts, violations in
relation to national minorities. We send these reports to all Georgian
instances, up to the president of the country, as well as international
organizations, UN, European structures. We do not only raise issues
and problems of national minorities of Georgia but also influence
Georgian authorities, initiate changes in legislation through appeals
to international and European organizations which Georgia joins to.

Our organization has prepared an alternative report ‘On execution by
Armenia on the convention about prevention of racial discrimination
in relation to frontier villages in Kvemo Kartli region of Georgia
at the 78th session of the Committee for prevention of racial
discrimination of UN. The alternative reports “Muslim Community of
Georgian Azerbaijanis” and “Recovery of toponyms as one of the real
steps to restore interethnic dialogue in Kvemo Kartli” at the 79th
session of the UN Committee for Prevention of Racial Discrimination.

The alternative report is “On execution of the Framework Convention on
Protection of National Minorities in relation to frontier villages in
Kvemo Kartli region of Georgia by Armenia”. The alternative report is
‘On execution by Georgia of the Framework Convention on Protection of
National Minorities in Kvemo Kartli region of Georgia” in the Council
of Europe.

For many years, the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict over Nagorno
Karabakh had its negative impact on the state of Azerbaijani villages
of Georgia, bordering Armenia. What are the problems in this sphere?

Georgian territories bordering Armenia have been settled by
Azerbaijanis since ancient and now in these regions we see gradual
annexation and eviction of ethnic Azerbaijanis who are the citizens
of Georgia. The most critical situation established in the villages
of Sadakhlo, Burma Tezekend, Tezekend, Beytarabchi, Mollaoghlu and
others, where ethnic Azerbaijanis constitute the greater part of
the population.

The Armenian-Georgian border in this area goes deeper into Georgia as
an appendix and Georgian villages of ethnic Azerbaijanis are stuck
by Armenia from east and west. The gradual eviction of Azerbaijani
population from their native lands by Armenia is seen in these frontier
villages with the absolute connivance of the Georgian authorities. We
see the loss of Georgian lands and do not witness the reaction of
the relevant Georgian bodies who have to protect these lands.

How do they carry this eviction policy on the Armenian-Georgian border?

The situation in this region remains unclear, because given the
constitutional inviolability of Georgian lands, our human rights
recommendations and monitoring must be welcomed, but we see no
reaction. Our authorities have not created and seem not willing to
create favorable, safe conditions which would allow the residents
of these villages to stay in this region. Moreover, unfortunately,
the all state officials from among Azerbaijanis who work and are
represented in the state bodies of Georgia remain indifferent to this.

The coefficient of efficiency in both the state interests of Georgia
and Azerbaijan can be reduced to zero.

Then what is Armenia’s role in the outflow of Azerbaijani population
from frontier Georgian villages?

Our authorities keep silent about the violation of rights of their
citizens-Azerbaijanis in Georgia by neighbor Armenia. Unfortunately,
we have to note that the absence of the real border between Georgia
and Armenia in this direction, the absence of the frontier guard of
Georgia here makes the local Azerbaijani population vulnerable in the
face of armed threat from Armenia. Making use of the absence of the
border limits, for many years Armenian side has been extending the
frontier strip inside the Georgian territory, evicting Azerbaijani
population out of there and settled Armenian residents in these
‘acquired’ lands. We have repeatedly spoken about this problem on
most high level meetings and get the following answer: “This border
section has not yet passed delimitation and demarcation process”.

However, this does not hamper Armenia to build frontier posts and
military units along the border line. Why do they build them? Not
only we but also most leading Georgian public figures, journalists
of leading mass media say it almost every month, but the result is
that Azerbaijanis abandon their villages.

Armenian military base on Georgian border near Sadakhlo village.

Additionally, currently this has started to be promoted by the Russian
program “Compatriot” thanks to which over 3000 Azerbaijanis of Georgia
have left to Russia.

How does it take place, considering that Armenia and Georgia are
sovereign states and it seems paradoxical that Georgian authorities
watch the annexation of their sovereign territories without saying
a word of protest?

Armenian frontier guards drive away cattle belonging to Azerbaijanis,
capture residents of Azerbaijani villages, shoot them from their
frontier Armenian posts, as well as at night they move frontier
columns, capturing the sowing area, pastures and even houses of
Azerbaijanis.

For example, Georgian frontier lands were captured in 2007. At that
time, at the desire of Armenian frontiermen, the frontier columns
passed tangent to the villages of Sadakhlo, Burma and Tezekend,
making a number of houses belong to Georgian Azerbaijanis illegal.

Under psychological pressure of Armenian militaries, these residents
abandoned their homes. Unfortunately, our authorities did not react
to this or make effort to protect both the rights of their citizens
and inviolability of state border, thus inspiring the Armenian side
to a new capture of frontier lands.

One more example, the resident of Beytarabchi village which is also
on the Georgian-Armenian border, paid taxes on time to the regional
tax bodies of Georgia for almost 15 years, but all of a sudden this
sowing land and the garden of the Georgian citizen-Azerbaijani was
captured and annexed to Armenia.

Making use of unclear borders and lack of strict control of our
authorities, the Armenian armed forces started to apply direct
discrimination on ethnical belonging in this region, accompanied
with illegal arrests of Georgian citizens, ethnic Azerbaijanis, under
pretense of violating the state border of Armenia. We have the lists
of arrested Azerbaijanis, most of whom were then returned from Armenian
captivity where they were beaten and abused. Some hostages were brought
to the center of Armenia and there are facts when those people went
missing there. There was an attempt of raping an Azerbaijani woman
working in the field. We collect claims on all facts and document it,
holding regular monitoring.

Why don’t the Georgian frontier guards and authorities react adequately
to such lawlessness of the Armenian side?

The matter is that unlike Georgian frontier guards, who can be counted
on fingers, Armenian frontier guards build their frontier units along
the border, many along a short section of border,m by the way, the
section which is spoken of as non-demarcated and non-delimitated.

Meanwhile it is almost empty on the Georgian side. As a result,
Armenian frontier guards move the border right to the sown land,
where Azerbaijanis work.

We have documented information about invasion of Armenian frontier
men and illegal search in the houses of Azerbaijanis in Georgia,
without notification to Georgian authorities. From here Armenian
frontier guards often shot at the residents of Azerbaijani villages,
which also promotes the outflow of Azerbaijanis from these regions. The
factor of psychological instability and psychological pressure goes
beyond the limit. But it is the positive factor that local authorities
recently started to react promptly and return their citizens back but
not always cattle and livestock, which Armenian side drives away. In
such cases, material damage has never been compensated.

What are the results of such creeping annexation by Armenia?

In a short period, over 500 citizens of Armenia illegally settled
and use the lands that are considered Georgian. Georgian Azerbaijanis
say this in open seeing no assistance of their authorities.

As a result of occupation by Armenian armed forces of woods,
pastures in the territories of Georgia and the threats to occupy
the sowing lands near Sadahlo, Tazakand, BurmaTazakand, Beytarapchi,
Mollaoghly villages, with predominantly Azerbaijani population, most
of the residents left the indicated villages. By some estimates, of
15,000-18,000 ethnic Azerbaijanis -citizens of Georgia, just nearly
4000-6000 are left. The emigration process has not stopped yet.

The regional market in Azerbaijani village Sadakhlo was shutdown a few
years ago. This dealt a big blow on the village, since it deprived
the residents of their main source of income. Over 400 families,
who borrowed loans in the banks to set up small business, bankrupted
and stuck in debt pit. As a result, this impoverished the residents
and promoted their gradual outflow. The village residents did not
conceal their outrage that after the market shutdown, a similar market
opened nearby in Armenia in the former Azerbaijani village of Lembeli,
present-day Bagratashen.

It all proves that the direct and veiled discrimination and violation
of the framework agreement on protection of rights of national
minorities signed by both Georgia and Armenia are seen towards
Georgian Azerbaijanis. The Azerbaijanis of Georgia need protection
of their constitutional rights and constitutional inviolability and
integrity of Georgian territory, each section, each meter of the
Georgian territory, regardless of where in Georgia it is.

As far as I know, along with MRMG&TOLERANCE, you also head the
recently created “Coalition on protection of public interests of
ethnic Azerbaijanis of Georgia”. What does this organization deal with?

The Coalition for the Protection of the public interests of ethnic
Azerbaijanis in Georgia, which included first 11 public Azerbaijani
organizations in different directions was created in September 2011.

Now their number is13, but there those willing to join and we are
consulting with them.

The aim is to integrate and coordinate methods and measures to protect
the public interests of ethnic Azerbaijanis in Georgia, since it
requires strong leadership and action from all groups and levels of
society. There is a need for greater involvement of all sectors of
society to the current process. The Coalition for the Protection of
the public interests of ethnic Azerbaijanis in Georgia is intended
to mobilize key stakeholders at the regional and central level for
common efforts and joint action.

Of course, we intend to operate and maintain close cooperation with
both regional and central authorities of Georgia. The latest example
of the joint monitoring of the cultural heritage of Azerbaijanis in
conjunction with the Ministry of Culture of Georgia gives us a reason
to be positive.

BAKU: Azerbaijan Does Not Expect Anything New From OSCE MG’s Upcomin

AZERBAIJAN DOES NOT EXPECT ANYTHING NEW FROM OSCE MG’S UPCOMING VISIT TO REGION

Trend
Nov 24 2011
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan does not expect anything new from the upcoming visit of the
OSCE Minsk Group to the region, Azerbaijani Deputy Foreign Minister
Araz Azimov told journalists on Thursday.

“Armenia, as before, takes advantage of the situation for its own
selfish ends. Rather than responding to Azerbaijan’s constructive
proposals, Armenia chooses a different way, uses occupied Azerbaijani
territories for its selfish ends and, thus, shows no interest in
moving the process forward,” Azimov said.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France, and the U.S. –
are currently holding the peace negotiations.

Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

He said though the situation clarified after Azerbaijani and Armenian
presidents’ Kazan meeting, which was held with the mediation of
the Russian president, but stagnation ensued. On the other hand,
French President’s visit to Yerevan and Baku also yielded no results,
Azimov said.

Azimov said that Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov
will attend a conference of the Council of OSCE Foreign Ministers in
Vilnius in early December.

He said Mammadyarov is not yet scheduled to meet with his Armenian
counterpart in Vilnius.

Azerbaijan is ready to continue negotiations, he added.

ANKARA: Records In Hrant Dink Trial Handed In To Court

RECORDS IN HRANT DINK TRIAL HANDED IN TO COURT

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 24 2011
Turkey

Dink was the chief editor for weekly Agos, a bilingual newspaper.

Turkey’s Telecommunications Directorate (TÝB) has finally delivered
the phone records requested by the court overseeing the case of Hrant
Dink, a Turkish-Armenian journalist assassinated in 2007, after months
of dawdling.

TÝB had earlier rejected two other court demands to disclose the
relevant phone records, first by indicating to the court that no
phone calls were made in the area in question, then by claiming
that the disclosure of such information would amount to a “violation
of privacy.”

In October, however, TÝB responded to the same demands by a higher
court with a counter request. The TÝB demanded that a series of
simulated phone calls be made and that other relevant information
about the calls, such as their duration and date, also be recorded.

The request could be in vain, however, as the locations of the base
stations in the area might have changed, or the base stations may
have been removed altogether in the four years that have passed since
the assassination.

TÝB offered no explanation as to how placing such simulated phone
calls might shed light on the events surrounding Dink’s murder.

Dink, a journalist of Armenian origin, was the chief editor for
weekly Agos, a paper published in both Turkish and Armenian. He was
shot in front of his office in January 2007. Triggerman Ogun Samast
was sentenced to 22 years in prison in July for the murder.