Vahagn Khachatrian: Authorities Will Agree To Go To Special Presiden

VAHAGN KHACHATRIAN: AUTHORITIES WILL AGREE TO GO TO SPECIAL PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

Noyan Tapan
March 19, 2009

YEREVAN, MARCH 19, NOYAN TAPAN. For the Armenian National Congress
(ANC) Yerevan council of elders elections are not means of seizing
Mayor’s post, but an occasion to prove that it was first President,
ANC leader Levon Ter-Petrosian who won the 2008 presidential
elections. Vahagn Khachatrian, a member of the Alternative
political-public initiative, an ANC representative, the former Yerevan
Mayor, stated at the March 19 press conference. According to him,
judging by the circumstance that in the 2008 elections L. Ter-Petrosian
received most of votes in Yerevan and the authorities always had
difficulties in rigging the elections in Yerevan, the ANC victory in
the May 31 elections is beyond any doubt.

"Winning the council of elders elections we will continue demanding the
authorities’ resignation and special state elections," the opposition
figure said. According to his prediction, the authorities will not be
able to resist the political and socio-economic challenges faced by
the country and as a result will agree to go to special presidential
elections. Those elections, according to V. Khachatrian, will be held
either in 2009 or at the worst in early 2010.

Touching upon ANC’s and Zharangutiun’s discussions on running for
Yerevan council of elders elections with a common electoral roll,
the former Mayor expressed the hope that these two political forces,
nevertheless, will find common verges. V. Khachatrian repeated that
not a problem of a post will be solved, but Armenia’s further fate
will be decided on May 31.

US Reps remind Obama of his pledge to recognize Armenian Genocide

PanARMENIAN.Net

U.S. Congressmen remind President Obama about his pledge to recognize
Armenian Genocide
12.03.2009 18:02 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ In advance of the upcoming 94th Anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide, Representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA), George
Radanovich (R-CA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and Mark Kirk (R-IL) wrote a
letter to President Barack Obama commending him on his record of
supporting the truth about the Armenian Genocide and urging the
President to make a strong statement of recognition on April 24th.

`Throughout his career, President Obama has always demonstrated a
profound understanding of history and the moral courage to speak
plainly about the horrors of genocide,’ said Schiff. `We applaud his
strong recognition of the Armenian Genocide as a Senator, and look to
him for continued strong leadership on this issue as President.’

`Over the years, the President of the United States, regardless of
political party, has done a great disservice by refusing to properly
recognize the Armenian Genocide,’ said Radanovich. `As a proud
representative of the Armenian American community, and co-author of
the Armenian Genocide Resolution, I commend President Obama for his
previous commitment to the truth and I eagerly await the fulfillment
of his promises to recognize the Genocide as President.’

`As a senator and as a candidate, President Obama demonstrated a clear
record of supporting recognition of the Armenian Genocide,’ said
Pallone. `As Co-Chair of the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues,
I am hopeful that both the President and Congress will not waiver in
their efforts to discuss the past openly and honestly.’

`As a U.S. Senator and as a presidential candidate, President Obama
made unprecedented commitments to recognize the Armenian Genocide,’
Kirk said. `Knowing his personal commitment to ending genocide and
promoting human rights, we are hopeful President Obama will keep his
promise.’

Preservation Of Historical Monuments In BSEC Countries To Be Discuss

PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN BSEC COUNTRIES TO BE DISCUSSED IN YEREVAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
27.02.2009 20:22 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ A number of cultural events will be launched in
Yerevan on Mar. 4 within the framework of Armenia’s chairmanship in
Black Sea Economic Cooperation Organization. Round table discussions
on preservation of historical monuments in BSEC will be organized by
the Ministry of Culture.

The following BSEC member states will participate in the discussion:
Bulgaria, Turkey, Armenia, Greece, Romania, Russia, Serbia and
Georgia. From Mar 4-11 an exhibition and a screening of documental on
preservation of historical monuments will be conducted in the National
Gallery of Armenia. Armenia’s National Esthetic center will host a
"Cloudless sky above the Black Sea" exhibition featuring the drawings
of children from BSEC member states.

Turkey warns US over Armenian massacres dispute: report

Agence France Presse
January 17, 2009 Saturday 11:13 AM GMT

Turkey warns US over Armenian massacres dispute: report

ANKARA, Jan 17 2009

Turkey’s foreign minister has warned Barack Obama’s incoming
administration that any US recognition of Armenian massacres by
Ottoman Turks as genocide could derail reconciliation efforts between
the two neighbours.

"It would not be very rational for a third country to take a position
on this issue… A wrong step by the United States will harm the
process," the Anatolia news agency quoted Ali Babacan as saying late
Friday.

Turkey has "never been closer" to normalising ties with Armenia, its
eastern neighbour, and a breakthrough could be secured in 2009, the
minister said.

Obama, who takes office Tuesday, pledged to his Armenian-American
supporters during his election campaign to recognise the World War I
killings as genocide.

Washington has traditionally condemned the massacres, but has so far
refrained from terming them genocide due to concern about straining
relations with Turkey, a NATO member and a key ally in the Middle
East.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their kin were killed between 1915
and 1917 as the Ottoman Empire fell apart, a claim supported by
several other countries.

Turkey rejects the genocide label and argues that 300,000-500,000
Armenians and at least as many Turks died in civil strife when
Armenians took up arms for independence in eastern Anatolia and sided
with invading Russian troops.

Babacan said the dispute was among the issues that Ankara and Yereven
had been discussing since reconciliation efforts gathered steam in
September when Turkish President Abdullah Gul paid a landmark visit to
Armenia.

"Turkey and Armenia have never been closer to a plan on normalising
relations," Anatolia quoted Babacan as saying.

The fence-mending process, he said, was boosted by similar
reconciliation efforts between Armenia and Azerbaijan, a close ally of
Turkey.

"The prospect of normalising relations both between Azerbaijan and
Armenia and between Turkey and Armenia in 2009 is not a dream," he
added.

Ankara has refused to establish diplomatic ties with Yerevan on
account of its campaign to have the killings recognised as genocide.

In 1993, it also shut its border with Armenia in a show of solidarity
with Azerbaijan, then at war with Armenia over Nagorny-Karabakh,
dealing a heavy blow to the impoverished nation.

Gul became the first Turkish head of state to visit Armenia when he
travelled to Yerevan in September to watch a World Cup qualifying
football match between the two countries on the invitation of his
Armenian counterpart Serzh Sarkisian.

BAKU: Mediators Forcing Baku To Agree To Karabakh Peace Plan – Azeri

MEDIATORS FORCING BAKU TO AGREE TO KARABAKH PEACE PLAN – AZERI PUNDIT

Yeni Musavat
Nov 15 2008
Azerbaijan

A leading Azerbaijani political analyst has said attempts are under
way to force Baku to accept an unfavourable Nagornyy Karabakh
conflict settlement plan. Vafa Quluzada said Baku has rejected
the plan which sought a special status for Azerbaijani districts
of Lacin and Kalbacar, as well as a self-determination referendum
in Nagornyy Karabakh. The following is the text of Orxan Qaracayli
report by opposition Azerbaijani newspaper Yeni Musavat on 15 November
headlined "The emerged ‘Madrid agreement’ is not fake" and subheaded
"Vafa Quluzada: ‘It has emerged in order to make our ears and eyes
accustomed to the points contained there"; subheadings have been
inserted editorially:

It has become known that the Azerbaijani-Armenian talks on resolving
the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict are being conducted within the framework
of the "Madrid agreements". Armenia’s Aravot newspaper has obtained
the text of "Madrid principles" from an internet blog in English. The
text of the document that appeared in the foreign media was published
in full in the previous edition of Yeni Musavat.

The document was put forward by the OSCE Minsk Group. Although it
does not contain specific points on settlement of the conflict, it
gives grounds for genuine fear over Nagornyy Karabakh. For example,
it contains a recommendation to the Armenian government to vacate
districts adjacent to Nagornyy Karabakh, with special provisions for
Kalbacar and Lacin districts [of Azerbaijan that are located between
Armenia and Nagornyy Karabakh]. It also said that the final status
of Nagornyy Karabakh is to be decided in a referendum.

The document did not state clearly whether the Karabakh conflict
is to be resolved within the framework of Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity or self-determination of Nagornyy Karabakh.

Government statements "absurd"

In no way can it be considered a coincidence that the "Madrid
agreement" emerged following the Moscow declaration [signed by the
Azerbaijani and Armenian presidents on 2 November]. It appears that
Armenians were interested in having this document come to light
because of differences in points of the Moscow declaration and the
"Madrid principles". In any case, it was an Armenian newspaper that
searched for and found the document called "Madrid principles"
from English-language websites. It is also possible that this
English-language blog is being controlled by the Armenian lobby.

An interesting aspect of the issue is that both Azerbaijani and
Armenian officials have given absurd statements after the document
emerged. Armenian Foreign Minister Edvard Nalbandyan said that
Azerbaijan and Armenia have not signed documents on the resolution of
the [Nagornyy Karabakh] conflict. It follows from his remarks that
the "Madrid principles" were not a draft of a final resolution. The
Azerbaijani government claims that the document published by newspapers
is not "Madrid principles". The government is saying that the document
has been distorted, faked by somebody and then passed on to the press.

However, a number of experts say that the document is not a fake. In
their view, the document is being described as false in order not
to violate the principle of keeping the negotiations secret. On the
other hand, if it is admitted that this is the original document,
the room for manoeuvre for the government will shrink.

Attempts to impose "Madrid principles" on Azerbaijan

Political analyst Vafa Quluzada said that he does not believe the
claims that the published "Madrid principles" are fake.

"I think this is the original document. The reason why it has emerged
is to make our eyes and ears accustomed to these developments. This
is the objective. However, it must be admitted that the Azerbaijani
leadership did not accept these principles. Therefore, all efforts
by [OSCE Minsk Group] co-chairs are directed at making Azerbaijan
accept the principles in question. That is, Azerbaijan needs to let
the Armenians in Karabakh to conduct a referendum and make a decision
through voting. This means that Azerbaijan will voluntarily legitimize
the independence of Nagornyy Karabakh or let it remain a part of
Armenia. And this is not all. The issue of Lacin and Kalbacar is
being differentiated, special provisions are in place for them. That
is, these two districts either remain under the control of Russian
or Armenian troops, or they are returned to Azerbaijan on certain
conditions. In this case, Lacin and Kalbacar nominally belong to
Azerbaijan, but are controlled by Armenians. The reasoning for this
is that allegedly if Azerbaijan receives back Lacin and Kalbacar,
it will be able to attack Armenians from there. This is complete
nonsense because it was Armenia that attacked Azerbaijan and seized
its territories. There has never been a fact of Azerbaijan attacking
Armenia. The real objective of the ‘Madrid principles’ is to declare
Nagornyy Karabakh independent and make it de-facto part of Armenia."

Vafa Quluzada said it would be wrong to describe the "Madrid
principles" as a document. "This is not a document, but a draft
by three co-chairs. It would have been a document if the sides
had accepted it. These are so far recommendations and some of the
recommendations have already been implemented. For example, the
point on restoring visits between Armenia and Azerbaijan has been
realized. Azerbaijani intellectuals have gone to Armenia and Armenian
citizens have visited Baku. This was an attempt to implement the
‘Madrid principles’."

Warring Monks Threaten Destruction Of The Church Of The Holy Sepulch

WARRING MONKS THREATEN DESTRUCTION OF THE CHURCH OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE
Sheera Frankel in Jerusalem

Times Online, UK
October 15, 2008

Church of the Holy Sepulchre. The Deir al-Sultan monastery on its
roof is judged to be in an "emergency state" of degeneration

A long-running row over the rights to a rooftop section of the Church
of the Holy Sepulchre could bring the entire structure tumbling down,
destroying Christendom’s holiest site.

While renovations are needed across the church, the small Deir
al-Sultan monastery on its roof has reached an "emergency state",
according to engineers who completed an evaluation this month.

The Times has learnt that in 2004 the two chapels and twenty-six
tiny rooms that comprise the monastery were pronounced in dire need
of reinforcement. They have since deteriorated to the point where
engineers now fear that they will crash through the roof and into
the church, venerated by millions of Christians as the site of the
Crucifixion and burial of Jesus.

Yigal Bergman, the engineer who led the investigation, reported that
the church, situated in the Christian Quarter of the Old City of
Jerusalem, was in a dangerous state of construction. "The structures
are full of serious engineering damage that creates safety hazards
and endangers the lives of the monks and the visitors. This is an
emergency".

Local officials are pressing the church to begin repairs before
the heavy autumn rains begin but have stopped short of interfering
directly in its notoriously acrimonious affairs.

The church has been vigilantly managed by six competing and often
fractious Christian denominations — Roman Catholic, Greek Orthodox,
Armenian Orthodox, Coptic, Syrian Orthodox and Ethiopian — since an
agreement reached under Ottoman law in 1757.

Rival denominations often battle for access or space and the
congregation at the annual Easter service sometimes resembles the
terraces of a boisterous football match. The keys to the main entrance
of the church have been held by a Muslim family since the 12th century
because the Christians do not trust one another.

The dispute over the Deir al-Sultan monastery is a more recent
phenomenon dating back to Easter 1970. When the Coptic monks, who
had controlled the area, went to pray in the main church and left the
rooftop unattended, Ethiopian monks seized the opportunity to change
the locks at the entrances before the Copts returned.

Relations between the two groups have remained tense ever since,
with the Coptic Church refusing to relinquish its claim to the
monastery and posting a single monk there at all times. In the midst
of a blistering heatwave in the summer of 2002, the Coptic monk on
duty moved his chair from its agreed spot to a shadier corner. The
move was taken as a hostile manoeuvre by the Ethiopians and 11 monks
needed hospital treatment after the ensuing fracas.

The rest of the church factions have been unable to mediate between
the two groups, even in the case of minor repairs or renovations to
the rooftop. Archbishop Matthias, head of the Ethiopian Church in
Jerusalem, wrote a letter to the Israeli Interior Ministry and the
Bureau of Jerusalem Affairs this month describing the dire state of
the buildings.

The Archbishop stated in the letter that he did not recognise the
right of the Coptic Church in any part of the disputed area. He said,
according to the Haaretz Hebrew daily, that it was "inconceivable
that the implementation of emergency repairs at the holy site would
be conditioned on the consent of the Coptic Church". The Archbishop
added that he was turning to the Israeli authorities, as a neutral
party, to carry out the repairs.

Israel has offered to shoulder part of the cost of repairs but will
do so only if the Christian factions first come to an agreement
among themselves.

The Copts, who are mainly of Egyptian origin, received preferential
treatment during Ottoman, British and Jordanian rule. That changed
after Israel took control of Jerusalem in the 1967 Six-Day War, fought
against a combined Arab force, including Egypt. The Copts accused
Israel of using its position in Jerusalem to aid the Ethiopians in
1970 in their takeover of Deir al-Sultan.

Nine years later, when Israel and Egypt signed the Camp David peace
accords, Coptic officials hoped that the rooftop monastery would
be restored to them. Israel, however, is mindful of its sensitive
relations with Ethiopia, where hundreds of thousands of Ethiopian
Jews lived and were brought to the Jewish state in the 1980s and 1990s.

The Greek Orthodox Patriarch Theophilus III said: "There is a greater
issue here, something that has to be addressed sooner or later. To
be honest, so far the [Israeli] Government has tried to keep out of
the dispute. But now it seems that the Government is under pressure
to demonstrate concern in helping resolve the issue."

Bible bashiing

— In the 19th century a ladder was placed on a ledge above the main
entrance to the church. A priest from another denomination accused the
man of trespassing and a row began that has yet to be resolved. The
ladder is still there

— In 1995 the church announced it had reached a decision on how
to paint a part of the dome in the central part of the structure —
but only after 17 years’ debate

— In 2004 during Greek Orthodox celebrations of the Exaltation of
the Holy Cross, a door to the Franciscan chapel was left open. This
was taken as a sign of disrespect by the Greek Orthodox faction and
a fight broke out. There were several arrests

— Another fight broke out on Palm Sunday this year when a Greek
monk was ejected from the building by a rival faction. Police were
attacked by the feuding monks and several people were taken to hospital

‘Open Skies’ Contract Between Armenia And The USA

‘OPEN SKIES’ CONTRACT BETWEEN ARMENIA AND THE USA

ArmInfo
2008-10-09 12:30:00

ArmInfo. Armenia and the USA have made the "Open Skies" contract,
head of US Transport Department Mary Peters reported.

"This is the first contract between the two countries in the sphere
of air transport. Armenia has become the 94th partner of the USA on
the Open Skies’, – she said. The Open Skies removes all the limits
on air transport for contract member-states. For this reason it will
make it possible for the American and Armenian air companies to use
these countries as transit ones when implementing flights to America
and Armenia.

BAKU: Minister notes Iran "new ideas" for regional peace, stability

ITV, Azerbaijan
Sept 13 2008

Minister notes Iran’s "new ideas" for regional peace, stability

[Presenter] Today Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev received Iranian
Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki. The development of relations
between the two countries in various areas was underlined at the
meeting. It was noted that the visit was important for the overall
development of mutual relations and for the discussion of future
relations.

In the course of his visit to Baku the Iranian foreign minister was
also received by Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov. At
the meeting, where the future of mutual cooperation was discussed, the
Azerbaijani foreign minister noted the importance of continuing these
kinds of discussions. Elmar Mammadyarov also stressed that he would
meet his opposite number on the sidelines of the next session of the
UN General Assembly. Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki, who
had fruitful discussions with Azerbaijani officials, said that
official Tehran has new ideas designed to serve stability and peace in
the region.

[Manuchehr Mottaki addressing reporters, with Azerbaijani translation
superimposed] During my meetings that lasted several hours, I and
Azerbaijani officials discussed the latest situation in the
Caucasus. The Iranian state is putting forward new ideas serving peace
and stability in the region. I am confident that these ideas will be
supported by the countries of the region and contribute to the
development of the region. I have also planned visits to some European
states as well as to Armenia. During those visits, I will also promote
these ideas. The latest developments show that there should be close
cooperation among the regional countries. I asses my visit to Baku as
very efficient.

Full Comment in Briefs: We’re all Nagorno-Karabakhians now

National Post, Canada
Aug 17 2008

Full Comment in Briefs: We’re all Nagorno-Karabakhians now

Posted: August 16, 2008, 10:00 AM by Kelly McParland
Full Comment, Kelly McParland

By Kelly McParland

John McCain, feeling his oats, announced the other day that `we are
all Georgians’ now.

Georgia was under attack by Russian troops, you see, and since we’re
supposed to sympathize with them, that makes us all Georgians.

It may not surprise you to know that this is not the first time we’ve
all had our identities changed by a politician in the throes of
oratory. John F. Kennedy famously declared himself a Berliner on a
visit to the city. Ronald Reagan went a step further, declaring:
`Standing before the Brandenburg Gate, every man is a German,
separated from his fellow men. Every man is a Berliner, forced to look
upon a scar.’

Reagan liked the line, which he had used earlier in another variation,
declaring `In this profound sense, we are all Americans,’ in a 1982
speech referring to two dozen countries in and around the Caribbean. A
similar line, `Today we are all Americans’ was widely used by
U.S. allies after 9/11, including in a statement by Israel’s Benjamin
Netanyahu.

So we’re all Georgians, we’re all Berliners and we’re all Americans. I
just hope no one attacks Nagorno-Karabakh. I don’t think I could fit
it on my passport.

Photo, above: Ronald Reagan at the Berlin Wall in September, 1990
(REUTERS/Michael Probst/Files)

blogs/fullcomment/archive/2008/08/17/184555.aspx

http://network.nationalpost.com/np/

Expert: Iran’s Willingness To Mediate For Turkey-Armenia Reconciliat

EXPERT: IRAN’S WILLINGNESS TO MEDIATE FOR TURKEY-ARMENIA RECONCILIATION IS A TOOL OF PRESSURE ON ANKARA

PanARMENIAN.Net
22.07.2008 14:32 GMT+04:00

Iran’s willingness to mediate for Turkey-Armenia is an peculiar
tool of pressure on official Ankara, and is a response to Turkey’s
mediation between Syria (Iran’s ally) and Israel (Iran’s opponent).

"Iran wants to bring pressure on Turkey with using the Armenian
factor," Iranian expert Hatam Ghaderi said.

"The Armenian lobby in Iran is strong, and using this factor, Armenians
urge Iran to mediate for normalization of relations with Turkey,"
Ghaderi said in a phone conversation.

As Turkey mediates between Syria and Israel, Iran also wants to "play"
with Turkey using the Armenian factor, according to him.

"Actually, Turkey first started to play with Iran and ‘put its cards
on the table’ against this country. Teheran, in response, wants to
put pressure on Turkey, using Armenia as the trump card," Ghaderi said.

Ufug Cosgun, a Turkish political scientist, supposes that Iran’s
statements about willingness to act as a mediator between Turkey and
Armenia was made as an alternative to Turkey’s mediation between Syria
and Israel. According to Cosgun, this mediation may prove effective.

"Ankara has a series of principal and unchangeable conditions on
normalization of relations with Armenia. If the latter accepts them,
reconciliation will be beneficial for Azerbaijan as well," Cosgun said,
Trend Azeri news agency reports.

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki offered mediation during
a phone conversation with his Armenian counterpart Edward Nalbandian.