Music: Ruzan Mantashyan To Sing At Dresden Opera Ball

Opera Wire
Jan 27 2020
 
 
Ruzan Mantashyan To Sing At Dresden Opera Ball
 
By Francisco Salazar
 
Ruzan Mantashyan is set to perform at the Dresden Opera Ball.
 
After reports alleged that Yusif Eyvazov refused to perform the singer earlier this month, the Semperoper released a statement confirming the participation of the soprano.

Semper Opernball stated, “the 30-year-old soprano, born in Yerevan, will sing Tatyana’s great aria from the opera ‘Eugene Onegin’ by Peter Tchaikovsky in Dresden.

Hans-Joachim Frey, first Chairman of the Semper Opera Ball added, “The Semper Opera Ball follows its general philosophy of speaking the language of art, bringing artists and cultural workers together and building bridges between nations, cultures and perspectives. I am pleased that Ruzan Mantashyan has finally been able to accept a role in Dresden and that all other artists and colleagues who appear at the ball also support this. Mantashyan will be with the MDR Symphony Orchestra under the direction of Kristjan Järvi together with performers such as the tenor Yusif Eyvazov, the violinist Pavel Milyukov, the soprano Julia Muzychenko, the pianist Alexander Kashpurin etc.”

The soprano Mantashyan also released a statement noting, “I was convinced that culture knows no borders and I’m glad this belief is shared by so many people who supported me with their words and deeds these past few days. I am pleased to inform my listeners that on Feb. 7th, I will sing Tatiana’s aria at the Dresden Opera Ball.”


168: The government’s measures tantamount to expropriation in the media industry

On , the Prime Minister of Armenia has launched attack on television companies in Armenia labelling them as “the corruptioners’ TV networks”. He went further saying that those TV channels must use “corruption” logos when they broadcast. Interestingly, the Government also discussed the need for transparency in business, including in the media industry, especially in relation to ownership and tax requirements (ultimate beneficial ownership). Furthermore, the Chairman of the Competition Commission surprisingly declared that the abuse of dominant position is available in the media industry.

It is apparent that the various state institutions have conspired together to attempt to silence critical media voices which are the threats to the independence of the media sector. The Government’s intent is to make the press serve those in power rather than the public. It is apparent the Government has no an evidence-based policy at all which would enable to assess the risks and implement the reforms.

Apart from the threats to media freedom, the Government intends to undertake regulatory measures which would be tantamount to expropriation which represents the most serious infringement of private property rights. The authorities must realize that at its essence, an expropriation is the taking of private property by a government acting in its sovereign capacity. If the Government decides to expropriate those television companies, it has two options: “lawful” and “unlawful” expropriations.

A “lawful” expropriation must be, at a minimum, for a public purpose, non-discriminatory and accompanied by a prompt, adequate and effective compensation. The principles of Armenian legislation recognize a similar standard and generally include the further requirement that expropriation be conducted according to due process of law. However, if it is an “unlawful”, the Government would open a floodgate for claims in courts and international arbitrations where the standard of compensation would be different and extremely high.

It is important to note that the authorities have already taken measures in the medial industry which have risen to a substantial deprivation (indirect expropriation) by arresting the owner of TV 5, Armen Tavadyan.

It is to be noted that the Government is already facing expropriation cases in international arbitration which have a negative impact on the country’s investment environment. The Government has failed to provide the minimum standards of protection – Lydian and Sanitek are likely to bring their arbitration claims against Armenia.

Furthermore, if the Government decides to revoke the TV licenses, it may result in an interference with the rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention of Human Rights which guarantees the right to property. Any such interference with the rights protected by Article 1 would fail to meet the requirement of lawfulness. It is the first and most important requirement and It must be compatible with the rule of law which includes freedom from arbitrariness. If there is an alleged violation, Armenia is required to compensate for expropriation. In addition, those TV companies can argue in the Strasbourg Court that there is a violation under Article 14 in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 i.e., the applicant has been denied all or part of a particular asset on a discriminatory ground and it was a politically-motivated deprivation under Article 18 of the Convention.

Concluding, the Government’s duty must be to ensure the sustainability of independent media in Armenia and ensure that its actions do not amount to a deprivation of property.

 GPARTNERS LAW FIRM

Sargis Grigoryan, Partner




International brands with Made In Armenia label: 4 major garment factories opened in Armenia

International brands with Made In Armenia label: 4 major garment factories opened in Armenia

Save

Share

 17:59, 1 November, 2019

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 1, ARMENPRESS. From now on the clothes of several international brands will be produced in Armenia and will be exported to the European and Russian markets with “Made in Armenia” label.

The opening ceremony of 4 garment factories of Sartex, Asa Garment, Alex Textile and Texas Production was held on November 1 in Yerevan. The ceremony was attended by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pahsinyan who toured the factories, got acquainted with the production process and the products.

“More than 3000 people will work here in the future. The production will be exported mainly to the European, also Russian markets. All products are with Made in Armenia label”, director of the Asa Garment, Alex Textile and Texas Production companies Marat Movsisyan said.

Sartex has been founded by the Italian Sartis and Armenian Alex Textile companies. Sartex represents Sartis Italian company in Armenia. The company is engaged in production of clothes of MaxMara, Moncler, Peuterey, Dolce&Gabana, Dainese and other famous brands. Director of the company Mkhitar Aghabekyan said they want the Made in Armenia label become a quality guarantor.

Asa Garment is an Armenian-Chinese company engaged in production of the French Jennifer brand’s clothes. The company also holds talks for producing ZARA brand clothes. At the moment the company has 300 employees, but soon this number will reach 1000.

Alex Textile produces clothes for the Russian companies.

Armenia keen on boosting electricity coop. with Iran

Mehr News Agency, Iran
Nov 2 2019

TEHRAN, Nov. 02 (MNA) – Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure of the Republic of Armenia expressed Fri. his country’s willingness to increase the level of cooperation with Iran in the power sector.

During a visit to the 19th Iran International Electricity Exhibition in Tehran, Suren Papikyan said Armenia has maintained good ties with Iranian companies in the electricity field and is keen on boosting the relations in a broader aspect.

The Armenian official, who is scheduled to hold meetings with Iranian power officials on Saturday, expressed hope the talks would result in signing good agreements on boosting cooperation.

He added that Armenian companies welcome participating in the 20th Iran International Electricity Exhibition.

Iran and Armenia have been cooperating for years in gas and electricity swap, and two-way economic and political ties have grown in tandem with an increase in trade.

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 30-10-19

Central Bank of Armenia: exchange rates and prices of precious metals – 30-10-19

Save

Share

 17:47,

YEREVAN, 30 OCTOBER, ARMENPRESS. The Central Bank of Armenia informs “Armenpress” that today, 30 October, USD exchange rate up by 0.05 drams to 476.20 drams. EUR exchange rate up by 1.82 drams to 529.20 drams. Russian Ruble exchange rate up by 0.02 drams to 7.46 drams. GBP exchange rate up by 3.16 drams to 613.63 drams.

The Central Bank has set the following prices for precious metals.

Gold price down by 84.10 drams to 22762.42 drams. Silver price down by 6.02 drams to 270.38 drams. Platinum price down by 44.45 drams to 14054.75 drams.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 10/30/2019

                                        Wednesday, 
U.S. House Recognizes Armenian Genocide
        • Emil Danielyan
U.S. – Capitol Building dome detail with US flag waving.
After decades of lobbying by the Armenian community in the United States, the 
U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed on Tuesday evening a 
landmark resolution recognizing the 1915 genocide of Armenians in Ottoman 
Turkey.
The resolution adopted by 405 votes to 11 calls on the U.S. government to 
“commemorate the Armenian Genocide through official recognition and 
remembrance” and to “reject” Turkish efforts to deny it. It says the government 
should also “encourage education and public understanding of the facts of the 
Armenian Genocide” and their “relevance to modern-day crimes against humanity.”
The resolution was introduced by several pro-Armenian U.S. lawmakers, including 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, in April. It reached the 
House floor after being backed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader 
Steny Hoyer. They both reaffirmed their support during an hour-long debate on 
the bill that preceded the vote.
“It’s a great day for the Congress,” Pelosi said, urging a “strong vote” for 
acknowledging “one of the greatest atrocities of the 20th century.”
“This was genocide and it is important that we call this crime what it was,” 
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel said as he presented the 
resolution to fellow legislators. He called on them to finally “set the record 
straight.”
U.S. -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam 
Schiff, D-CA, speak during a press conference in the House Studio of the US 
Capitol in Washington, October 2, 2019
More than a dozen other lawmakers, most of them Democrats representing 
constituencies with large numbers of Armenian Americans, spoke during the 
ensuing debate. They all made a case for recognizing the World War One-era 
slaughter of some 1.5 million Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire as 
genocide.
“This is a vote which I have waited for 19 years to cast,” declared a visibly 
emotional Schiff.
"We cannot pick and choose which crimes against humanity are convenient to 
speak out against,” said the prominent Democrat from California. “What we must 
do is to state the fact that the Ottoman Empire committed this grotesque crime 
against the Armenians."
“Genocides, whenever and wherever they occur, cannot be ignored,” said Gus 
Bilirakis, a Florida Republican and a co-sponsor of the resolution.
Another Republican congressman, Christopher Smith of New Jersey, blasted Turkey 
for its “well-funded aggressive campaign of genocide denial”
The two leading Armenian-American lobby groups swiftly hailed the passage of 
the resolution. Bryan Ardouny, the executive director of the Armenian Assembly 
of America, said it “reflects the best of America.”
“Today’s watershed vote for human rights represents the culmination of decades 
of tireless work by members of Congress, the Armenian Assembly of America and 
the Armenian American community from across the country,” Ardouny told RFE/RL’s 
Armenian service.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) likewise praised the U.S. 
House for ending “Ankara’s gag-rule against American remembrance of the 
Armenian Genocide.”
The Assembly and the ANCA have spent decades campaigning for such a measure. 
Genocide resolutions drafted by pro-Armenian lawmakers have been repeatedly 
approved by congressional committees in the past. But they never reached the 
House or Senate floor because of opposition from former U.S. administrations 
worried about their impact on U.S.-Turkish relations.
U.S. -- Demonstrators commemorating the 103rd anniversary of the Armenian 
genocide rally outside the Turkish Consulate in Los Angeles. April 24, 2018.
Like his predecessors, U.S. President Donald Trump avoided using the word 
genocide in his annual statements on the mass killings and deportations of 
Armenians. But Trump, whose relationship with the Democratic leadership of the 
House is very strained, appears to have made no attempts to thwart the passage 
of the latest genocide bill.
Successive Turkish governments have vehemently denied a deliberate Ottoman 
government effort to exterminate the Ottoman Empire’s Armenian population.
The Turkish ambassador in Washington, Serdar Kilic, sent last week letters to 
House members warning that the resolution will “considerably poison the 
political environment between the United States and Turkey.” Ankara was quick 
to condemn its adoption as a “meaningless political step” and “grave mistake.”
The Turkish Foreign Ministry also said that it will damage U.S. interests in 
the region. “On the other hand, it is also noted that the attitude of the U.S. 
Administration on 1915 events remains the same,” it added in a statement.
Predictably, Armenia welcomed the U.S. recognition of the genocide, with Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian describing it as “historic.” “Resolution 296 is a bold 
step towards serving truth and historical justice that also offers comfort to 
millions of descendants of Armenian Genocide survivors,” Pashinian wrote on 
Twitter early on Wednesday.
“Thank you, U.S. Congress,” Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian tweeted for 
his part. The U.S. lawmakers have sent a “massive message” against Turkish 
denial of the genocide, he said.
The resolution made rapid progress in the Congress following Turkey’s military 
incursion into northern Syria largely controlled by U.S.-backed Kurdish forces. 
The operation was strongly condemned by many Democratic and Republican 
lawmakers.
Immediately after passing the Armenian bill, the House voted overwhelmingly for 
a resolution calling on Trump to impose sanctions on Turkey.
U.S. House Recognizes Armenian Genocide
        • Emil Danielyan
U.S. – Capitol Building dome detail with US flag waving.
After decades of lobbying by the Armenian community in the United States, the 
U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed on Tuesday evening a 
landmark resolution recognizing the 1915 genocide of Armenians in Ottoman 
Turkey.
The resolution adopted by 405 votes to 11 calls on the U.S. government to 
“commemorate the Armenian Genocide through official recognition and 
remembrance” and to “reject” Turkish efforts to deny it. It says the government 
should also “encourage education and public understanding of the facts of the 
Armenian Genocide” and their “relevance to modern-day crimes against humanity.”
The resolution was introduced by several pro-Armenian U.S. lawmakers, including 
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, in April. It reached the 
House floor after being backed by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader 
Steny Hoyer. They both reaffirmed their support during an hour-long debate on 
the bill that preceded the vote.
“It’s a great day for the Congress,” Pelosi said, urging a “strong vote” for 
acknowledging “one of the greatest atrocities of the 20th century.”
“This was genocide and it is important that we call this crime what it was,” 
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot Engel said as he presented the 
resolution to fellow legislators. He called on them to finally “set the record 
straight.”
U.S. -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam 
Schiff, D-CA, speak during a press conference in the House Studio of the US 
Capitol in Washington, October 2, 2019
More than a dozen other lawmakers, most of them Democrats representing 
constituencies with large numbers of Armenian Americans, spoke during the 
ensuing debate. They all made a case for recognizing the World War One-era 
slaughter of some 1.5 million Armenian subjects of the Ottoman Empire as 
genocide.
“This is a vote which I have waited for 19 years to cast,” declared a visibly 
emotional Schiff.
"We cannot pick and choose which crimes against humanity are convenient to 
speak out against,” said the prominent Democrat from California. “What we must 
do is to state the fact that the Ottoman Empire committed this grotesque crime 
against the Armenians."
“Genocides, whenever and wherever they occur, cannot be ignored,” said Gus 
Bilirakis, a Florida Republican and a co-sponsor of the resolution.
Another Republican congressman, Christopher Smith of New Jersey, blasted Turkey 
for its “well-funded aggressive campaign of genocide denial”
The two leading Armenian-American lobby groups swiftly hailed the passage of 
the resolution. Bryan Ardouny, the executive director of the Armenian Assembly 
of America, said it “reflects the best of America.”
“Today’s watershed vote for human rights represents the culmination of decades 
of tireless work by members of Congress, the Armenian Assembly of America and 
the Armenian American community from across the country,” Ardouny told RFE/RL’s 
Armenian service.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) likewise praised the U.S. 
House for ending “Ankara’s gag-rule against American remembrance of the 
Armenian Genocide.”
The Assembly and the ANCA have spent decades campaigning for such a measure. 
Genocide resolutions drafted by pro-Armenian lawmakers have been repeatedly 
approved by congressional committees in the past. But they never reached the 
House or Senate floor because of opposition from former U.S. administrations 
worried about their impact on U.S.-Turkish relations.
U.S. -- Demonstrators commemorating the 103rd anniversary of the Armenian 
genocide rally outside the Turkish Consulate in Los Angeles. April 24, 2018.
Like his predecessors, U.S. President Donald Trump avoided using the word 
genocide in his annual statements on the mass killings and deportations of 
Armenians. But Trump, whose relationship with the Democratic leadership of the 
House is very strained, appears to have made no attempts to thwart the passage 
of the latest genocide bill.
Successive Turkish governments have vehemently denied a deliberate Ottoman 
government effort to exterminate the Ottoman Empire’s Armenian population.
The Turkish ambassador in Washington, Serdar Kilic, sent last week letters to 
House members warning that the resolution will “considerably poison the 
political environment between the United States and Turkey.” Ankara was quick 
to condemn its adoption as a “meaningless political step” and “grave mistake.”
The Turkish Foreign Ministry also said that it will damage U.S. interests in 
the region. “On the other hand, it is also noted that the attitude of the U.S. 
Administration on 1915 events remains the same,” it added in a statement.
Predictably, Armenia welcomed the U.S. recognition of the genocide, with Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian describing it as “historic.” “Resolution 296 is a bold 
step towards serving truth and historical justice that also offers comfort to 
millions of descendants of Armenian Genocide survivors,” Pashinian wrote on 
Twitter early on Wednesday.
“Thank you, U.S. Congress,” Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian tweeted for 
his part. The U.S. lawmakers have sent a “massive message” against Turkish 
denial of the genocide, he said.
The resolution made rapid progress in the Congress following Turkey’s military 
incursion into northern Syria largely controlled by U.S.-backed Kurdish forces. 
The operation was strongly condemned by many Democratic and Republican 
lawmakers.
Immediately after passing the Armenian bill, the House voted overwhelmingly for 
a resolution calling on Trump to impose sanctions on Turkey.
Press Review
“Zhamanak” reports that the Armenian government is planning to increase 
budgetary funding for the national police by 500 million drams (over $1 
million) next year. The paper welcomes this intention, saying that the state 
must “financially motivate” the police. “This is certainly not the most 
decisive thing in the important task of reforming the [law-enforcement] 
system,” it says. “But it is one of the important things and starting points of 
the reform.”
“Hraparak” predicts that controversial decisions made by Armenian 
law-enforcement authorities in their high-profile investigations into current 
and former state officials will eventually be overturned by the European Court 
of Human Rights (ECHR) and cost Armenia millions of dollars in damages. “Every 
case that is investigated by the Special Investigative Service, the National 
Security Service and the Investigative Committee will come back in the form of 
a slap in our face after reaching Strasbourg,” claims the paper.
“Aravot” says that voicing baseless allegations against the incumbent 
authorities has been the norm for various Armenian opposition forces for the 
last 27 years. For instance, the paper says, political opponents of the current 
authorities deliberately mislead the public about a European convention on 
violence against women in an effort to discredit Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian. It says that Pashinian himself attacked Armenia’s former government 
with similarly unfounded claims when he was in opposition. “Politics is like 
this all over the world,” writes the newspaper editor.
“Haykakan Zhamanak” defends Foreign Minister Zohrab Mnatsakanian against strong 
domestic criticism of his interview with the BBC which touched upon the 
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, among other issues. The pro-government paper 
dismisses claims by former government officials and their supporters that the 
current Armenian leaders’ harsh criticism of their predecessors is now 
exploited abroad to the detriment of the official Armenian position on the 
conflict.
(Tatevik Lazarian)
Top Investigator Coy About Indicting Constitutional Court Head
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
        • Narine Ghalechian
Armenia -- The head of the Special Investigation Service, Sasun Khachatrian, 
holds a press conference in Yerevan, September 11, 2018.
The head of Armenia’s Special Investigative Service (SIS) declined to say on 
Wednesday whether it will bring criminal charges against Constitutional Court 
Chairman Hrayr Tovmasian recommended by another law-enforcement body.
“This is a legal dispute, a legal issue, and I will not talk about it now,” 
Sasun Khachatrian told reporters.
The Investigative Committee on Tuesday claimed to have collected sufficient 
evidence that Tovmasian abused his powers when he served justice minister from 
2010-2013. The latter denied the allegations through his lawyers.
The committee stopped short of indicting him, saying that it has sent the case 
to the SIS for further investigation. Crimes allegedly committed by senior 
state officials are normally investigated by the SIS.
“We received the criminal case yesterday and are still examining it,” said 
Khachatrian. “I won’t make any comments on this case at the moment.”
The SIS already launched a separate inquiry into Tovmasian on October 17 two 
days after the Constitutional Court dismissed a parliamentary resolution 
demanding his ouster. Five days later, the law-enforcement body effectively 
declared illegal Tovmasian’s appointment as court chairman in March 2018, 
saying that it amounted to a “usurpation of power” by former state officials. 
One of them, former parliament speaker Ara Babloyan, was indicted on Monday.
Babloyan was not arrested, unlike Arsen Babayan, a former senior parliament 
staffer facing the same coup charges leveled last week. The SIS says that 
Babayan illegally backdated in March 2018 an official document to enable the 
former Armenian parliament to install Tovmasian as court chairman before the 
entry into force of sweeping constitutional amendments.
The amendments introduced a six-year term in office for the head of Armenia’s 
highest court. Tovmasian, 49, took up the post under previous constitutional 
provisions allowing him to run the court until the age of 70.
Both indicted men flatly deny the accusations of forgery and “usurpation of 
power.” Critics of the Armenian government say Babayan’s arrest is part of its 
efforts to force Tovmasian to resign.
Armenia -- Arsen Babayan, the deputy chief of the parliament staff, April 6, 
2018.
Khachatrian dismissed suggestions that Babayan would not have been arrested had 
the Constitutional Court chairman bowed to the government pressure. “Hrayr 
Tovmasian’s resigning or not resigning does not matter for the criminal case,” 
said the SIS chief. “Again, the Special Investigative Service does not engage 
in politics.”
Senior parliamentarians from Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s My Step alliance 
have also denied any political motives behind the criminal proceedings.
It emerged on Wednesday that a prominent Armenian human rights campaigner, 
Avetik Ishkhanian, and Nagorno-Karabakh’s human rights ombudsman, Artak 
Beglarian, have appealed for Babayan’s release from pre-trial custody. In a 
petition sent to relevant authorities, they said that they can guarantee the 
“proper conduct” of the former official if he is set free.
Ishkhanian has been very critical of the high-profile cases, saying that they 
are politically motivated.
One of Babayan’s lawyers, Yervand Varosian, insisted, meanwhile, that his 
client should not have been arrested and prosecuted in the first place. 
Varosian claimed that a judge in Yerevan failed to present any legal grounds 
when he sanctioned Babayan’s arrest on October 24.
Babayan was detained on October 21 and initially suspected of only forgery, a 
crime covered by a general amnesty declared by the Armenian parliament last 
year. His lawyers protested against what they see as an illegal detention 
before the SIS leveled the more serious coup charge against the former deputy 
chief of the parliament staff.
Press Review
“Zhamanak” comments on concerns voiced by Gianni Buquicchio, the president of 
the Venice Commission, about the Armenian government’s standoff with the 
Constitutional Court. The paper says that Buquicchio used diplomatic language 
to say that the Armenian parliament has a bigger role to play in reforming the 
country than the court’s chairman, Hrayr Tovmasian, and his supporters. “It is 
evident that Armenia’s new leadership does not need an ‘open conflict’ with the 
Council of Europe,” it says. “Having disagreements with the Venice Commission 
would effectively mean a conflict with the Council of Europe.” The question is, 
the paper goes on, whether Tovmasian’s resignation is so vital for the 
government that it is ready to risk being censured by the Council of Europe.
Alvina Gyulumian, a member of the Constitutional Court, tells “Haykakan 
Zhamanak” that government allegations that the court is hampering political 
reforms in Armenia are “attempts to manipulate the public.” Gyulumian says she 
and her colleagues will resign only if the authorities abolish the 
Constitutional Court through constitutional changes approved by Armenians in a 
referendum. “After all, we work for the public,” she says. “But nobody will 
resign from this court if that is demanded by ten or a hundred persons who feel 
offended for some reason and think this court has not protected their 
interests.”
“Hraparak” reports on unfolding parliamentary discussions of the Armenia’s 
state budget for next year drafted by the government. The paper quotes Finance 
Minister Atom Janjughazian as saying that the spending bill is significantly 
better than previous Armenian budgets. “But this does not mean that we will be 
starting to build a country from scratch,” Janjughazian says. Both the current 
and former governments have strived for macroeconomic stability in the country, 
he says.
(Anush Mkrtchian)
Reprinted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2019 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
www.rferl.org

Karabakh General threatens to ‘destroy’ Armenian PM

JAM News
Oct 12 2019

The sharp attacks on the Armenian authorities by Vitaliy Balasanyan, running for the presidency of Nagorno-Karabakh, and the opinions of Armenian politicians

Major General Vitaliy Balasanyan, the former secretary of the Security Council of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic and a national hero of Artsakh, has criticised the authorities of Armenia on many occasions.

This time around, he has not limited himself to harsh attacks against the Prime Minister of Armenia and accusations, in particular, of “usurping” the authorities, but also threatened physical punishment for Nikol Pashinyan.

Answers from Armenia did not have to wait long. Local politicians do not hide their indignation regarding Balasanyan’s statements and demand that he be held accountable.

All this is happening on the eve of the upcoming presidential elections in Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020, in which one of the contenders for the presidency is Vitaly Balasanyan.

Armenian PM lists impressive long-term development goals at opening of Pan-Armenian games

The seven most important events in Armenia in 2018

The Karabakh general expressed his opinion about the post-revolutionary authorities of Armenia in an interview with LIVEnews.am which lasted almost two hours.

Below, the most scandalous statements by Vitaliy Balasanyan, which provoked quite the reaction in Armenia.

Firstly, he stated that the current Prime Minister of Armenia came to power thanks to the “well-known centers” in the West, and that they continue to rule Nikol Pashinyan and dictate further actions to him.

He expressed the opinion that in the spring of 2018, Nikol Pashinyan came to power, having carried out a coup, and in fact “usurped” the government.

Secondly, Balasanyan stated that in 2016 Nikol Pashinyan was trying to control the protest that arose after the Sasna Tsrer group seized the building of the police patrol and police regiment in Yerevan.

Balasanyan was referring to the events of July 2016, when an armed group seized a police station and demanded the release of opposition leader Zhirayr Sefilyan from arrest, but protest gradually grew into a demand for the resignation of then-President Serzh Sargsyan.

Nikol Pashinyan at that time was an opposition politician and openly spoke about the need for a change of government. But the armed group voluntarily surrendered, the protests did not reach that critical point, and thus the change did not take place.

Vitaly Balasanyan called Sasna Tsrer a terrorist group and linked it to the prime minister.

In his opinion, Nikol Pashinyan and Sasna Tsrer “are elements of one terrorist group.” And the recent meeting of the prime minister with the leaders of the Sasna Tsrer he assessed as an attempt to put pressure on dissidents:

“Nikol Pashinyan is trying to terrorize everyone, including me, saying: ‘Look, I have a combat wing that will physically deal with you at the click of a finger.’  I want to tell Pashinyan and Sasna Tsrer, that they shouldn’t hold such conversations, they will answer for it …

“In 2016, we forgave these terrorists and did not kill them, but now I declare: we will physically destroy everyone, those who try to carry out provocations and terrorist acts against me, our people, state, statehood, borders, authorities – that is, the Karabakh authorities.”

Armen Grigoryan, Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia, wrote on his Facebook page:

“Vitaly Balasanyan behaves like a bully, and not as a candidate for the presidency of Artsakh. Each time after meeting in Stepanakert with Serzh [meaning Serzh Sargsyan, the former president of Armenia, who left power under the pressure of thousands of people during the “velvet” revolution of 2018 – JAMnews], Vitaly begins to stroke tension.

“Balasanyan, who connected his political career with Serzh Sargsyan back in 2016, will be in the political dump where his leader is located.”

The Sasna Tsrer All-Armenian Party also issued a statement:

“It is disturbing and perplexing that the law enforcement agencies of Armenia have not yet taken any steps to check the likelihood of these threats being realized and to prevent violence against citizens and the state …

“We urge the authorities to show the necessary political will and instruct law enforcement agencies to fulfill their direct responsibility and eliminate real threats to state security and the lives of citizens. The collective source of these threats is the 5th column known to everyone: Robert Kocharyan, Serzh Sargsyan [second and third presidents of Armenia – JAMnews].”

Arman Babajanyan, a deputy of the National Assembly of Armenia, also spoke out on Facebook:

“This is not the first public threat from Vitaly Balasanyan.  Due to the lack of an adequate reaction in previous similar cases, Balasanyan allows himself … to speak the language of threats and blackmail against the legitimate authorities of Armenia, its leader.

“Unfortunately, this happens with the tacit consent of the current Artsakh authorities and the obvious enthusiasm and support of the revenge-seeking forces of Armenia.  The honorary title of the hero of Artsakh does not give anyone the right, including Vitaly Balasanyan, to go beyond  morality and the law…”

Bagramyan 26 telegram channel published the following text:

“Vitaly Balasanyan has given every reason to be held accountable for calls to physically destroy Pashinyan and co. He is actually threatening to kill the country’s leader and his supporters.  Does Balasanyan not understand this? His goal is to provoke the authorities to prosecute him, in order to then try to tear at their throats and shout that look, ‘they are persecuting me for political reasons!’

“He purposefully goes into this tough confrontation, hoping to receive political dividends on the eve of the election of President Artsakh and for the future struggle. The authorities are in a difficult position.  On the one hand, it is necessary to force Balasanyan to answer before the law for such threats, and on the other hand, one must not succumb to his gross provocations.

“What is the way out of this situation?  The process of punishing Balasanyan begins in Artsakh itself, at the hands of local authorities, and not the authorities of Armenia. Pashinyan’s supporters in Artsakh appeal to the local prosecutor’s office to consider Balasanyan’s statement and give a legal response, according to the laws of Artsakh.”

https://jam-news.net/karabakh-general-threatens-to-destroy-armenian-pm/




Artsakh’s President meets with delegation of Armenian Union of Russia

Artsakh’s President meets with delegation of Armenian Union of Russia

Save

Share

 20:00, 4 October, 2019

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 4, ARMENPRESS. President of Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan met with the delegation of the Armenian Union of Russia on October 4.

As ARMENPRESS was informed from the Office of Artsakh’s President, issues related to the implementation of different projects in Artsakh were discussed during the meeting. President Sahakyan highly appreciated the role of the Armenian Union of Russia in strengthening the Motherland – Diaspora ties, developing Artsakh and maintaining Armenian national identity.

168: Catholicos awaits PM’s return for “elucidations” regarding church comments

Category
Society

Catholicos Garegin II of the Armenian Apostolic Church told reporters today that after PM Nikol Pashinyan’s return to Armenia from the United States he will “most probably have elucidations” regarding the latter’s statement in Los Angeles.

“In this regard the church has already voiced an opinion. Most probably upon the prime minister’s return to Armenia we will have elucidations regarding this issue. We are periodically meeting with the prime minister and discussing problems and issues of concern for the church and the fatherland,” the Catholicos said.

Speaking about the political life he said there are issues facing the country which concern the people, and “these concerns, naturally, find their manifestation in our national life and the Diaspora’s life”.

“We are hopeful that all problems will be resolved, we pray for our country to live in peace and be stable,” the Catholicos added.

At a news conference in Los Angeles on September 23rd, a reporter from the Hay Kyank (Armenian Life) news website asked the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan to comment on his earlier statement that the government should not interfere in church affairs.Pashinyan had responded by saying: “I’d like to understand, do we want the government to enter church affairs? If it turns out that the Armenian people want the government to enter church affairs, the government will discuss this demand of the Armenian people, will understand what practical possibilities exist”.

He continued: “When we are saying that we aren’t entering the internal life, some clergy conclude that we are not like the former government, that we are a weak government”. He added that those who are thinking about conspiring and sabotaging the government will receive “a very heavy counterblow and will be brought down to their knees both literally and figuratively”.

“I’d like to warn anyone against mistaking our smiles and respect as weakness. Those who perceive our methods as weakness perceive the people as a weak, opinionless entity,” the PM said.

Long-awaited trial of Armenian ex-president begins in Yerevan

EurasiaNet.org
Sept 12 2019
Ani Mejlumyan Sep 12, 2019