CivilNet: 30 Days of War in Karabakh

CIVILNET.AM

19:48

It’s been a month now since the Azerbaijani attack on the population of Nagorno Karabakh on September 27.

Azerbaijan has been shelling civilians for 30 days non stop. In total, 7800 homes and 1310 public buildings have been damaged or destroyed. More than 900 Armenian soldiers aged 18 and over, are dead, more than 40 civilians lost their lives and more than a hundred have been wounded. In four weeks, approximately 60% of the Artsakh population, which represents 90,000 people, have left their homes.

This is an overview of a month of war in Nagorno-Karabakh. 

Despite Ceasefire, Fate Of The Nagorno-Karabakh May Turn On The Lachin Corridor

Forbes
Oct 26 2020

On Sunday, the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan signed on to a U.S. State Department-brokered humanitarian ceasefire that took effect at 8 a.m. local time this Monday.

In theory, the ceasefire should bring a temporary halt to nearly a month of fighting over control of the mountainous Nagorno-Karabakh region that Russian President Putin claims has already cost over 5,000 lives.

After the ceasefire was supposed to take effect, Azerbaijan accused Armenian forces of of violating it by 8:05 a.m with shelling. An Armenian spokeswoman counter-claimed that the Azerbaijani complaints had been mistakenly tweeted prior to that time.

An hour later, Armenia reported shelling by Azerbaijani forces. There have since been more reports on major fighting in multiple sectors and military aviation activity near the Armenia/Azerbaijan border.

Azerbaijan’s Pres. Ilham Aliyev also gave a speech today objecting to international interference in the conflict, asserting that “in the current situation, we see there is a military solution.” He also warned in the speech that Turkish F-16 fighters based in Azerbaijan would be used to retaliate in the event of foreign intervention, likely referring to Russia in particular.

Given that two prior ceasefires almost immediately fell apart, the odds of the current one lasting are tenuous unless the belligerents are genuinely willing to make a serious and sustained diplomatic effort. A meeting involving the Minsk Group (France, Russia and the United States) is set to convene on Thursday.

Without diplomatic progress, the ceasefire may merely give both sides a brief breather as they prepare for an even more intense round of fighting focusing on the so-called Lachin Corridor.

That’s because the corridor contains the only major highway connecting the de-facto Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (also called Artsakh) to the country of Armenia.

The Lachin corridor refers to the loan road running through Lachin that connects Stepanakert, … [+] regional capital of Nagorno-Karabakh, to Armenia.

Author, using Google Maps Imagery

After capturing most of the southern border with Iran, on October 22, Azerbaijani forces appeared to turn northwest. A cellphone video posted on the internet showed an Azerbaijani mechanized column temporarily delayed by a vehicle immobilized by a mine.

Geo-location suggested the Azerbaijani column had closed within 6 miles (10 km) of the Lachin artery.

If Lachin were seized by Azerbaijani forces, not only would it cut of the NKR capital of Stepanakert from receiving fuel, ammunitions and reinforcements; it would also cut off the only the route by which refugees in Nagorno-Karabakh could flee to Armenia.

Last Saturday, Armenian forces apparently mounted a counterattack against the forward Azerbaijani elements. An NKR official claimed in a recorded briefing that it had repelled these forces southward down the highway.

Armenian and Azerbaijani authorities have frequently released contradictory claims as to territorial control. But a conservative interpretation suggest that the advance in this sector was at least temporarily stalled short of the coveted corridor.

Armenian forces also began a counter-offensive near the far southwestern border of Armenia and Azerbaijan. Possibly staged from Armenian territory, the offensive may be aimed at diverting pressure away from Lachin. An Armenian video showing seven captured Azerbaijani BTR-70 armored personnel carriers has been geolocated to that sector.

The Pass Running Through Decades of War

Lachin, which means “hawk” in Azerbaijani, is itself is emblematic of the contradictions that have made the war so bitter. It is one of seven rayons (districts) outside of Nagorno-Karabakh occupied by Artsakh, which are a particular source of grievance to Azerbaijanis.

A truck drives on the so-called Lanchin corridor in 2007 in Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijan. The Lachin … [+] corridor is a mountain pass amidst de-jure borders of Azerbaijan, it is the shortest route which connects Armenia with Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

Getty Images

Soviet-era survey show that Armenians were generally the majority population of the Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous region. But surveys also showed the Lachin rayon, situated in between Nagorno-Karabakh and the Soviet republic of Armenia, as being 80% to 94% Azerbaijani.

Nonetheless, when Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh fought to secede from Azerbaijan in 1992, they seized Lachin to create a land corridor between Armenia and the NKR. Most of Lachin’s Azerbaijani population were forced to flee, becoming refugees in their own country.

Azerbaijan. Nagorno-Karabakh, Lachin City was captured by Armenian military units. Photo ITAR-TASS / … [+] Andrei Solovyov; Gennady Khamelyanin (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

TASS via Getty Images

The NKR renamed Lachin town by the Armenian name of Berdzor. Later, as civil war ravaged Syria, Syrian Armenians fled to Armenia and were resettled in this sector of the NKR.

Azerbaijan. Lachin is captured by Armenian military units. Photo ITAR-TASS / Andrei Solovyov; … [+] Gennady Khamelyanin (Photo by TASS via Getty Images)

TASS via Getty Images

The NKR’s occupation of Lachin was premised on strategic reasons: if Azerbaijani forces succeed in closing the corridor, they could completely isolate the NKR from external support. If the logistical link is severed, NKR forces would be cut off from the flow of fuel, munitions and reinforcements.

The town of Lachin/Berdzor in 2010 and the critical road running through it.

User Lyonking, released for public use under CC3.0 BY-SA license.

Even seizing terrain affording a good view of the road could render daytime transit on it impossible as convoys would be exposed to observed indirect fire from mortars and artillery, or even direct-fire from armored vehicles and anti-tank guided missiles. Even night travel would be perilous due to the prevalence of infrared sensors on armored vehicles and drones.

With supply lines severed, civilians in Nagorno-Karabakh could be cut off from food, running water and heat during the forthcoming Caucus winter. Furthermore, they may be denied a route by which to flee to Armenia. The result could be a humanitarian disaster in which casualties of trapped civilians spike due to lack of food and medical supplies, exposure to cold, and non-stop artillery bombardment.

A medical worker talks to a sick woman in a bomb shelter in Stepanakert, the separatist region of … [+] Nagorno-Karabakh, Thursday, Oct. 22, 2020. Heavy fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh continued Thursday with Armenia and Azerbaijan trading blame for new attacks, hostilities that raised the threat of Turkey and Russia being drawn into the conflict. (AP Photo)

ASSOCIATED PRESS

The extent of Azerbaijani President Aliyev’s objectives in the current conflict remain unclear. If he hopes to recapture all or most of Nagorno-Karabakh, he might see isolating it to be a means to weaken its heavily fortified defenders. However, the humanitarian disaster that could ensue would cause international pressure to mount on Baku, and increase pressure on Russia to intervene.

Azerbaijan might instead see capture of the highway as a way to gain leverage when seeking to secure less absolute objectives, notably regaining control of the Azerbaijani rayons outside of Nagorno-Karabakh held by Armenian forces.

GORIS, ARMENIA – OCTOBER 24: Refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh board a coach as they flee to safety in … [+] Yerevan on in Goris, Armenia. As Azerbaijan makes attempts to break through to the Lachin corridor – a key location linking the contested Nagorno-Karabakh region with the rest of Armenia – the young and elderly are fleeing to Armenia before the road to safety might be cut off entirely. (Photo by Alex McBride/Getty Images)

Getty Images

However, Lachin’s pivotal geographic position as one of those rayons underscores why Armenians fear compromise could render Nagorno-Karabakh difficult to defend in future conflicts.

For example, Aliyev has identified regaining control of the NKR-controlled town of Shusha/Shushi as a priority. Formerly a mixed-ethnicity community of cultural and religious importance to both Armenians and Azerbaijanis, its Armenian population was driven out in a pogrom in 1920; Azerbaijanis were forced out in May 1992. That town is not only situated a short distance away from the capital of Stepanakert, but lies in between it and Armenia.

View from a broken window of a building near the Shushi cathedral, Ghazanchetsots Cathedral, after … [+] Azerbaijan shelling that destroyed part of roof in a double attack on October 11, 2020. (Photo by Celestino Arce/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

NurPhoto via Getty Images


Border War Risks

Prior to the ceasefire, Armenian troops appear to have been committed to containing the Azerbaijani advance towards Lachin. Because the Azerbaijani advance units approaching Lachin themselves likely depended on narrow, extended lines of communication, they too may have been vulnerable to having their supply lines cutoff.

Observers have also noticed a trend in recent combat footage suggesting that Armenian troops may have fallen back from fortifications on relatively open ground to forested positions.

Not only would forested terrain inhibit observation and attack from drones, but the short lines of sight on the ground limit their exposure to observed artillery fire and make it easier to ambush enemy forces piecemeal.

However, forces confined to the woods may be less effective in interdicting the movement of Azerbaijani forces beyond, which could pose problems when it comes to defending Lachin.

Furthermore, a battle for Lachin would intrinsically take place next to the border with Armenia and Armenian town of Goris. And that carries significant risks for both sides.

Both Yerevan and Baku lean on Artsakh’s status as a de facto secessionist republic in what is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani territory to manage escalation risks. Officially, Armenia is not at war with Azerbaijan and vice versa, and the fighting is ostensibly between Azerbaijan and the NKR.

This dubious technicality provides a legal rationale for both sides to avoid waging more unrestricted warfare. While some cross-border attacks appear to have been mounted, they have been limited in scale and cloaked in ambiguity.

For example, there appear to have been some limited missile and/or drone attacks on targets in Armenia which Azerbaijan has not taken credit for. Armenian troops have launched Scud and Tochka ballistic missiles at Azerbaijani cities—but truthfully or not, Yerevan denies they were fired from inside the country of Armenia.

One risk for Baku is that an attack on target in Armenia could inadvertently strike, or come close to hitting, Russian military units in Armenia. That could compel Moscow to intervene in the war. If inclined, Putin might also position Russian units in the country to shield Armenian formations. Indeed, Russian formations reportedly have been stationed directly adjacent to Lachin.

In an intense fight for Lachin, Armenian commanders may be tempted to provide artillery support from across the border. But doing so too extensively might incite Azerbaijani escalation, or upset Moscow if it feels that Yerevan is trying to exploit its alliance.

Ultimately, the Lachin corridor seems destined to become a major flashpoint unless diplomatic efforts can capitalize on the ceasefire to explore a new status quo for the region. That might require finding ways to decouple the role that military force wielded by both sides has historically played in determining which ethnicity is permitted to dwell within a community, and which are compelled to flee.

Updated 10:45 a.m. EST with details on the fraying of the ceasefire, new comments made by Pres. Ilham Aliyev, and mention of Russian deployment near Lachin.

Armenia denies Azeri accusations, highlights launch of ICRC humanitarian actions

Save

Share

 11:31,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 26, ARMENPRESS. The Armenian Ministry of Defense reiterated that the Armenian side is strictly adhering to the humanitarian ceasefire set from 08:00 a.m. today.

“The statements of the Azerbaijani side that the Armenian side has allegedly violated the humanitarian ceasefire do not correspond to reality and are of provocative nature.

In this regard Armenia’s Ministry of Defense highlights the immediate introduction of parameters for monitoring the ceasefire and the start of the process of exchanging bodies and prisoners of war with the mediation of the ICRC,” Armenian Defense Ministry spokesperson Shushan Stepanyan said.

The Azerbaijani military violated the new humanitarian ceasefire agreement just 45 minutes into the deal and launched artillery attacks at Artsakh’s military positions in the north-eastern direction, the Armenian Defense Ministry spokesperson Shushan Stepanyan said on October 26. 

“Grossly violating the ceasefire agreement reached in the USA, starting from 8.45 a.m. today Azerbaijani armed forces opened artillery fire at the positions of Artsakh’s Defense Army in north-eastern direction,” Stepanyan said in a statement.

Another Azeri violation took place at 09:10. Azerbaijani forces fired 5 artillery shells at the Artsakh positions in the south-eastern direction.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Artsakh’s MFA applies to ICRC over footages released by Azerbaijan

Artsakh’s MFA applies to ICRC over footages released by Azerbaijan

Save

Share

 22:04,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 24, ARMENPRESS. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Artsakh appealed to the Stepanakert Office of the Mission of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on October 23 in connection with the publication in the Azerbaijani mass media of videos of soldiers of the Defense Army of the Republic of Artsakh and a civilian held captive by the Azerbaijani side, ARMENPRESS was informed from the press service of the Foreign Ministry of Artsakh. 

The need for the ICRC representatives to visit the prisoners of war and the hostage held captive in Azerbaijan and to ensure compliance by official Baku with its obligations under international humanitarian law regarding the captives’ treatment and conditions of their detention was underlined.

ANN/Armenian News – Week in Review – 10/18/2020

Armenian News Network / Armenian News

Armenian News: Week in Review

ANN/Armenian News

October 18, 2020

  • Asbed Kotchikian

  • Emil Sanamyan

  • Asbed Bedrossian

  • Hovik Manucharyan

Hello, and welcome to the Armenian News Network, Armenian News, Week in Review.

This Week we’re going to continue to talk about the ongoing war in Artsakh. We’re going to consider the following major aspects:

  • In retrospect: tracing our steps back to September 27.

  • Call from the extra parliamentary opposition to establish a War Council.

  • Mobilization of the Armenian Diaspora.

To talk about these issues, we have with us:

Asbed Kotchikian, who is a senior lecturer of political science and international relations at Bentley University in Massachusetts.

And

Emil Sanamyan, a senior research fellow at USC’s Institute of Armenian Studies specializing in politics in the Caucasus, with a special focus on Azerbaijan.

YouTube           Apple            Google         Spotify       Facebook

Today we’re exploring where the diplomacy stood On Sep. 27, – essentially from the Turkish/Azeri threats of war, for the 2 months since July, – and then why it took a long time for anyone in the international arena to react and even recognize that there was a real war in progress; and finally how the world reacted and what it means, and where we’re headed.

On Friday, 13 extra-parliamentary political parties in Armenia called on the government to create a coordinating and executive council which includes former presidents, FMs and DM with the authority to make executive decisions regarding the military/political developments and to strategize a common action.

The Armenian diaspora has been mobilized since the first day of the war and worldwide Armenian communities have been engaged in fundraising, gathering medical and humanitarian assistance as well as organizing protests in major cities around the world. The communities have also activated in urging their governments to #RecognizeArtsakh. How important has this been in the overall war effort? 

That concludes our program for This week’s Armenian News Week in Review. We hope it has helped your understanding of some of the issues from the previous week. We look forward to your feedback, and even your suggestions for issues to cover in greater depth. Contact us on our website, at Armenian News.org, or on our Facebook PageANN – Armenian News”, or in our Facebook Group “Armenian News – Armenian News  Network.

Special thanks to Laura Osborn for providing the music for our podcast. I’m Hovik Manucharyan, and on behalf of everyone in this episode, I wish you a good week. Thank you for listening and talk to you next week.

Armenia, Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Negotiations, Lavrov Plan, Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan

Nagorno-Karabakh locals inspect damage to their houses after shelling

Republic World, India
Oct 18 2020
Written By

Associated Press Television News

Residents in Nagorno-Karabakh assessed damage to their properties on Saturday as Armenia and Azerbaijan announced a new attempt to establish a cease-fire in their conflict in the disputed region.

The new agreement, which starts from midnight, was announced following Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s calls with his counterparts from the two nations, in which he strongly urged them to abide by the Moscow deal.

The move comes a week after a Russia-brokered truce frayed immediately after it took force.

On Saturday, several properties were seen destroyed in Stepanakert, the main city in disputed Nagorno-Karabakh.

The region lies within Azerbaijan but has been under the control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia since a war there ended in 1994.

The latest fighting that began on September 27 has involved heavy artillery, rockets and drones, killing hundreds in the largest escalation of hostilities between the South Caucasus neighbors in more than a quarter-century.

(Disclaimer: This story has not been edited by www.republicworld.com and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Saying Turkey is ‘Increasing Risk,’ Pompeo Hopes Armenia Can Defend Itself

October 15,  2020



Secretary of State Mike Pompeo during a press briefing on Oct. 14

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Thursday acknowledged that Turkey is assisting Azerbaijan in its attacks on Artsakh, but offered little assurance that the United States would step up, as a co-chairing country of the OSCE Minks Group. Instead, he expressed hope that Armenians would be able to defend themselves against the ongoing attacks.

“We now have the Turks, who have stepped in and provided resources to Azerbaijan, increasing the risk, increasing the firepower that’s taking place in this historic fight over this place called Nagorno-Karabakh, a small territory with about 150,000 people,” said Pompeo during his daily briefing on Thursday when asked to comment about the ongoing military aggression against Artsakh, saying “It is dangerous.”

“We’re hopeful that the Armenians will be able to defend against what the Azerbaijanis are doing,” said Pompeo. “…and that they will all, before that takes place, get the ceasefire right, and then sit down at the table and try and sort through this – that is – what is a truly historic and complicated problem set.”

“Yeah, it’s a longstanding conflict. The resolution of that conflict ought to be done through negotiation and peaceful discussions, not through armed conflict, and certainly not with third party countries coming in to lend their firepower to what is already a powder keg of a situation,” explained Pompeo.

“Secretary of State Pompeo – who is only now starting to acknowledge the obvious truths about the brutal, ongoing onslaught against Armenian civilians by Azerbaijan and its Turkish/ISIS allies – has yet to take a single concrete step to halt this killing,” said Armenian National Committee of America Executive Director Aram Hamparian.
“Aside from passive remarks about how he’s ‘hopeful that the Armenians will be able to defend against what the Azerbaijanis are doing,’ he has yet to publicly condemn Aliyev, cut off a single dollar of U.S. military aid to Azerbaijan, or sanction even one official in Ankara or Baku for war crimes,” added Hamparian.

During his Wednesday press briefing, Pompeo suggested that President Donald Trump was aware that Turkey was “reinforcing” Azerbaijan. Saying the State Department was following the developments in the region, he again did not offer any insight on the steps the U.S. would take to quell the fighting. He just simply called for the sides to adhere to the ceasefire agreement and negotiate a settlement.

Alumni of program of U.S. Department of State address a letter to U.S. Ambassador to Armenia

Save

Share

 18:48,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 14, ARMENPRESS. 40 alumni of the Professional Fellows Program funded by the U.S. Department of State addressed a letter to the Ambassador of the USA to Armenia Lynne M. Tracy, with a call to prevent the Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression against the civilian population of Artsakh. ARMENPRESS reports, the letter runs as follows,

Honorable Lynne M. Tracy,

It is with the extreme concern we, the Professional Fellows Program Armenia alumni network, write you this letter to one more time bring to your attention the unprovoked ignition of war by  Azerbaijan and Turkey against Artsakh Republic and its civilian population, and call upon the United States to take all possible actions to cease the Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression.

Since the start of the war late September Azerbaijan with the direct support of Turkey has been using cluster munitions and indiscriminately attacking civilians, civilian objects and entire cities and villages of Artsakh Republic. All these violent acts have caused the death of the peaceful population of Artsakh Republic and brought about grave human rights violations, destruction of homes, and infrastructures. The direct targeting of civilians, the repeated bombardment of cities of Artsakh, including the spiritual and ethnic symbol of Armenians – the Ghazanchetots cathedral in Shushi – leaves us with no doubt that the Azerbaijani-Turkish army, backed by thousands of terrorist mercenary groups from Syria, pursue a clear objective of ethnic cleansing of Artsakh from Armenians. That being said, we witness yet another genocide of Armenians, this time in Artsakh.

As you know, Azerbaijan broke the cease-fire agreement reached in Moscow on the 10th of October, and as of October 12 almost all the civilian settlements of Artsakh are again the target of Azerbaijani-Turkish terrorist forces. The situation is on the brink of humanitarian crisis and requires immediate intervention of the international community to contain Azerbaijan’s and Turkey’s genocidal war against Armenians.

As part of the Armenian youth, we are firm, both in Armenia and Artsakh, in our choice of building Armenian statehood that hinges on democracy, rule of law, respect for human dignity, rights and freedoms which was even more strengthened during our fellowships in different parts of the United States. But today, not only massive violations of international human rights and humanitarian law are taking place in Artsakh, but also the very existence of Armenians is under imminent threat. This war is not only a threat for us, Armenians, but is also a global threat as we are dealing with international terrorism, obvious violation of human rights, and crimes against humanity.

Recalling our experiences in the United States, the necessity to bring and implement best practices and values and seeing your commitment, as a US Ambassador to Armenia, to the sustainable and democratic development of our country, we are hopeful  that United States will

-take immediate and vigorous action to stop the aggression of Azerbaijan and Turkey against Artsakh Republic and the Armenians,

-recognize the independence of the Republic of Artsakh, respecting the right of self-determination exercised by the people of Artsakh,

-call into questions the direct support of terrorism and aggression by Turkey, a member of NATO.

The letter is an individual initiative of Professional Fellows Program Alumni and does not represent the opinion of American Councils or the PFP Program




CivilNet: Statement by Armenian Studies Chair holders and Armenian Studies Program and Center Directors in the United States

CIVILNET.AM

02:35

The following is a statement by Armenian Studies Chair holders and Armenian Studies Program and Center Directors in the United States

We have been following with great concern the war being waged against the Republics of Artsakh (Nagorno-Karabagh) and Armenia. We condemn the large-scale military offensive against the Republic of Artsakh by the Republic of Azerbaijan which began in the early morning hours of September 27, targeting civilian populations in the capital Stepanakert and other cities. We wish to express our full solidarity with the citizens and the governments of Artsakh and Armenia and support the inalienable right of self-determination for the people of Artsakh. This is the largest military assault since the ceasefire signed in 1994, and shows the reckless disregard of the governments of Azerbaijan and Turkey for the peace efforts brokered by the OSCE Minsk Group. The involvement of the Republic of Turkey in the conflict is specially alarming given the Republic’s long history of anti-Armenian policies and persecution. Its aggressive involvement poses serious danger to the security of the entire region and to the physical existence of the Armenian people both in Artsakh and Armenia.

We believe that war and violence cannot take precedence over diplomatic negotiations that were under way for many years. We believe that working within OSCE Minsk Group framework is the only way to come to a peaceful resolution of the conflict. We call on the international community to exert their influence on Azerbaijan and Turkey immediately to put an end their military activities and to stop the war.

Hakem Al-Rustom
Alex Manoogian Professor of Modern Armenian History
Assistant Professor of History and Anthropology
Department of History
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Sebouh David Aslanian
Professor of History
Richard Hovannisian Endowed Chair in Modern Armenian History, UCLA
Inaugural Director, the Armenian Studies Center at the Promise Armenian Institute
University of California, Los Angeles

Stephan H. Astourian
William Saroyan Director, Armenian Studies Program Associate Adjunct Professor,
Department of History
University of California, Berkeley

Melanie Tanielian
Associate Professor of History
Director, Armenian Studies Program
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Kevork B. Bardakjian
Marie Manoogian Professor of Armenian Language & Literature
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Houri Berberian
Professor of History
Meghrouni Family Presidential Chair in Armenian Studies
Director of the Armenian Studies Program
University of California, Irvine

Peter Cowe
Narekatsi Chair of Armenian Studies Near Eastern Languages and Cultures
University of California, Los Angeles
Bedross Der Matossian President of the Society for Armenian Studies (SAS)
Associate Professor of History
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Barlow Der Mugrdechian
Berberian Coordinator of the Armenian Studies Program
California State University, Fresno

Salpi Ghazarian
Director, USC Institute of Armenian Studies
USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences
University of Southern California

Sergio La Porta
Haig and Isabel Berberian Professor of Armenian Studies
California State University, Fresno

Marc A. Mamigonian
Director of Academic Affairs
National Association for Armenian Studies and Research (NAASR)
Belmont, MA

Christina Maranci
Arthur Dadian and Ara T. Oztemel Professor of Armenian Art
Tufts University

Ina Baghdiantz McCabe
Professor of History
Darakjian Jafarian Chair of Armenian History
Tufts University

Simon Payaslian
Charles K. and Elisabeth M. Kenosian Chair in Modern Armenian History and Literature
Department of History
Boston University

Ara Sanjian
Associate Professor of History
Director, Armenian Research Center
University of Michigan, Dearborn

Vahram Shemmassian
Director of the Armenian Studies Program
California State University, Northridge

Will Iran’s past become prologue for Nagorno-Karabakh?

AXIOS
Oct 8 2020
 
 
Behnam Ben Taleblu

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is calling for “stability” and an “end” to the current fighting between Armenia and Azerbaijan — but should the conflict between its northern neighbors escalate, Tehran may well deepen its involvement.

What to watch: Iran’s recent history — specifically the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988) — provides a model of how that escalation might happen.

The big picture: The foreign-supplied arsenals boasted by both Armenia and Azerbaijan carry the risk of missile salvos targeting one another’s population centers, as seen in the “War of the Cities” between Iran and Iraq.

Another similarity between the two conflicts is the role of proxy forces.

  • Iran created Lebanese Hezbollah in 1982, the same year it invaded Iraq. During the war, Tehran relied on the Badr Organization, a group of Iraqi Shiite exiles to fight Saddam Hussein’s army.
  • Now, there are reportedly Syrian jihadists fighting on Azerbaijan’s side, with support from Turkey, a development Iran’s Rouhani called “unacceptable.”

The Iran-Iraq War also demonstrates that new alliances can come together, and multiple conflicts can converge, over the course of a larger war.

  • For example, Iran unsuccessfully took on the U.S. Navy in the Persian Gulf during its war with Iraq.
  • Where things stand: Turkey is already playing an active role in the conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh and another neighbor, Russia, clearly has interests to protect as well.

What to watch: Less attention is being played to the role of a third neighbor, Iran, which previously backed Christian Armenia rather than Shiite Azerbaijan when the two went to war in the 1990s, a decision best explained by geopolitics.

  • Tehran officially supports Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity (Nagorno-Karabakh is inside Azerbaijan’s borders), but has been accused of favoring Armenia and providing supplies to the Armenian-aligned government in Nagorno-Karabakh prior to the recent flare-up (Iran denies that).
  • There have been at least two indications that Iran may take a larger role now: ethnic Azeri protests in Iran in favor of Azerbaijan, and warnings by Iranian security officials that a spillover of shelling into Iranian territory won’t be tolerated.
  • Iran may also seize any opportunities to export weapons and offset adversaries like Israel, which is a leading arms exporter to Azerbaijan.

The bottom line: If the peaceful settlement Rouhani and others are calling for arrives soon, those calculations won’t come into play. If not, we could see shadows of another war that began four decades ago.

Behnam Ben Taleblu is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies