Latvian President Arriving In Armenia On Official Call

LATVIAN PRESIDENT ARRIVING IN ARMENIA ON OFFICIAL CALL

Pan Armenian
06.10.2005 08:41

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ October 6-8 Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga
along with her husband Imants Freibergs will be in Armenia on
an official call on the invitation of Armenian President Robert
Kocharian. As the Press Service of the Armenian leader had told
PanARMENIAN.Net before, the Latvian delegation will include Ministers
of Economy, Transport and Communication, Culture, other officials,
some 50 entrepreneurs. The visit main goal is to encourage development
of inter-state relations, strengthening cooperation, as well as
determination of priority directions of economic cooperation. The two
state leaders will discuss EU-Armenia cooperation, regional issues
and will exchange views over urgent international problems. It should
be noted that in April 2005 UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan included
Vaira Vike-Freiberga in the group of world leaders, who will promote
UN reforms as delegates of the Secretary-General.

Armenian-Italian Friendship Days Begin In Yerevan

ARMENIAN-ITALIAN FRIENDSHIP DAYS BEGIN IN YEREVAN
By Gohar Gevorgian

AZG Armenian Daily #179
06/10/2005

Event

“Armenians in Italy. Armenian Community of Italy” discussion will
open the Days of the Armenian-Italian Friendship. Vartan Oskanian,
RA foreign minister, will receive Adolfo Urso, Italy’s trade
minister. They will officially open the Days of the Armenian-Italian
friendship and “Armenian Venice. Treasures of St. Lazarus.” Gala
concert of classical concert at Aram Khachatrian Philharmonic Concert
Hall will complete the day.

Economic Potential Of Armenia And Ukraine Underused In Goods Turnove

ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF ARMENIA AND UKRAINE UNDERUSED IN GOODS TURNOVER BETWEEN THEM

Pan Armenian
04.10.2005 10:48

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today Armenian PM Andranik Margaryan met with
newly appointed Ukrainian Ambassador to Armenia Aleksandr Bozhko,
reported the Press service of the Armenian Government. Having
congratulated the diplomat with appointment to the office for a
second time, A. Margaryan said he hoped for the Ambassador to promote
Armenian-Ukrainian relations further. Mr.

Bozhko informed the Armenian PM on latest developments in the political
and economic life of Ukraine. The situation in the region is stable
at present, a new Government is formed, headed by an experienced PM,
relations in the international arena are also being regulated, he
emphasized. Having noted the importance of further strengthening of
political and diplomatic relations between the two countries that have
chosen the way of European integration, the interlocutors discussed
the current state and prospects of development of bilateral trade and
economic relations. They specifically highlighted cooperation within
international organizations. The economic potential of Armenia and
Ukraine is underused in goods turnover between the two countries, the
interlocutors noted. The parties expressed confidence that the previous
sessions of the Armenian-Ukrainian Inter-Governmental Commission for
Trade and Economic Affairs, as well as a range of agreements signed
between the parties would encourage bilateral economic relations. A.

Margaryan and A. Bozhko agreed to speed up the holding of the
Commission fourth session upon the appointment of its new Ukrainian
co-chair to deal with accumulated matters more efficiently.

Former Iranian President Warns US Against Military Attack On Iran

FORMER PRESIDENT WARNS US AGAINST MILITARY ATTACK ON IRAN

Voice of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran
Sept 30 2005

Former Iranian president and long-time Chairman of the Expediency
Council Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani has reiterated Iran’s intention to use
nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. He reminded the worshippers
at Tehran Friday prayers earlier today that despite being a victim of
Iraqi chemical weapons “Iran could have used chemical weapons. But it
did not”. Rafsanjani said: ” Our main task is to prove that we are not
the sort of people to utilize nuclear weapons… This shows that we are
not the people to resort to such ugly calamities… However, we must
prove this in practice to them [to IAEA and EU]. This is a difficult
task and requires talks and the delicate job of diplomacy.” The
following are excerpts from a live broadcast of Friday prayer sermons
by Iranian radio on 30 September, subheading inserted editorially.

[Rafsanjani] In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate.

[Passage on the forthcoming month of Ramadan, Iran-Iraq war
anniversary, omitted.]

The issue I want to talk about here is the nuclear issue. We are
facing a very serious and crucial situation. The issue is extremely
serious. Our nation should not be influenced by misleading comments
made to undermine the importance of the issue. Our nation has accepted
the main point and knows that nuclear technology is crucial to the
country and that it can not be ignored. Nothing is hidden from the
nation on the issue. The main challenge we are facing with at this
point in time is the conflict we have with those who want to create
nuclear apartheid and want to be the only ones to have this vast
power and important technology. We are not seeking the technology
for military purposes. We are pursuing it for peaceful purposes. We
want to utilize this technology for agriculture, energy, industry
and health. This technology is among the most advanced and up-to-date
technologies in today’s world and one cannot forgo this right.

If we forgo this right, it will be registered in the history of our
country, just like the Treaty of Turkmanchai [Agreement signed by
Russia and Persia in 1828 by which Persia was forced to cede part of
Persian Armenia to Russia and grant extraterritorial rights] or the
Treaty of Vosouq ol-Dowleh, and the officials of the country will
never be forgiven throughout history in the eyes of the nation.

Therefore we, the whole system with the guardianship of the leader,
are determined to defend this right with our full determination
and power. [Crowd chanting: God is great, Death to America, Death
to Israel]

But this challenge is not an easy one. Sometimes it is believed that
by looking at the matter optimistically, the morale of the people
will be boosted and it will increase their resistance. I, too, believe
that people should not despair and should be hopeful and resist. But
I do not believe that people should be given false hope in thinking
that others will resolve the issue for them. The issue is extremely
serious. Our opponents are explicitly and firmly stating that Iran
should not have the nuclear fuel cycle and we are explicitly and
firmly saying that we must have this technology. There is no other
alternative. Of course we are trying to resolve the matter through
negotiations. Because they are claiming that they do not trust Iran
and that they cannot be sure that Iran will not use the technology for
military purposes, we should prove to them that we are not doing so.

Our main task [over the nuclear issue] is to prove that we are not the
sort of people to utilize nuclear weapons. And we have a proud record
to prove this. I mean [at the time of the Iran-Iraq war] when our
combatants were martyred by [Iraqi] chemical weapons in such oppressive
manner, Iran could have used chemical weapons. But it did not. They
[Iraqis] were hitting our cities in the most despicable manner. But we
were instructed that before hitting any [Iraqi] city in retaliation,
we had to give a warning 48 hours in advance in order to give people
a chance to leave. This shows that we are not the people to resort
to such ugly calamities. Therefore, this is our nature. However,
we must prove this in practice to them [to IAEA and EU]. This is a
difficult task and requires talks and the delicate job of diplomacy.

Two points are important here. Firstly, our opposite side comprises
America, Europe and others. We tell them: To you, this [oily?] arena
is not a highway to cross. This is a mined battlefield and dangerous
for you. If you were to enter this arena, you will impose heavy losses
on the region, on yourself and on the rest of the world. Iran is not a
sort of state to raise its hands in surrender as soon as you pick up
your weapon and draw your dagger. Such a thing will not happen. You
should therefore act wisely and prudently. If by uttering words and
issuing resolutions, you intend to intimidate us, you must realize
that the Iranians are not scared and will not be intimidated.

If you truly wish to get somewhere, this cannot be achieved by
issuing resolutions, by intimidating us, by publishing articles and
by delivering speeches. Instead, one [you and Iranian authorities]
should sit around to talk and reach trust. And you will become certain
that Iran is not adventurous over this issue. Iran wishes to acquire
peaceful nuclear technology. This is a right that no country will
justify itself to sign away and deny itself the right. This will not
happen in Iran, if this is what you are pursuing.

I would like to let the [Iranian] managers in this sector know that
here you need diplomacy and not slogans. This is the place for wisdom,
the place for seeking windows that will take you to the objective,
the place for negotiations and extensive diplomatic activities to
say that we are present all over the world. This is the place for
utilizing all the levers at our disposal, but prudently, wisely and
with patience – without provocation and slogans that may please the
enemy and give him an excuse. We must avoid providing the enemy the
weapon that we could deploy in the world to gain victory.

We must properly resolve this sensitive problem facing our country,
with the goal of safeguarding our nation’s right and preventing others
violate the rights of our own people. God willing, we shall benefit
from the plentiful advantages of nuclear technology. [Shouts of
“God is great” from the conjuration]

Iraq and Palestine

I wanted to speak about Iraq and Palestine, but my second sermon went
on longer than I expected. I’m just going to point out that we are
witnessing mischievous and harmful actions that are hurting Iraqi
people. The three car bombs in Balad yesterday killed and injured
close to 200 people. There were more explosions in Hilla today –
these crimes usually occur in Shi’i sections. It would appear that
certain mysterious characters don’t want security to be restored
in Lebanon. Lebanon was the victim of civil war for years, which
destroyed it.

And It would appear that Israel has reduced its vulnerability
by withdrawing from Gaza. Because it was involved in clashes with
Palestinian combatants. These days it is attacking Palestinian areas
by tanks, fighter jets and helicopters. It has escalated its attacks
instead of working towards peace.

Syria is being threatened. We need Islamic unity today. We need
solidarity among those forces loyal to Islam and the revolution. God
willing, we will be able to strengthen our correct diplomatic actions
in the region and the world, thereby reducing the chances of harms
to the regions.

Delegation Headed By Greek DM To Arrive In Armenia On Oct.4

DELEGATION HEADED BY GREEK DM TO ARRIVE IN ARMENIA ON OCT. 4

Noyan Tapan News Agency
Oct 3 2005

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 3, NOYAN TAPAN. The delegation headed by Greece’s
Defence Minister Spilios Spiliotopulos will come on a two-day official
visit to Armenia on October 4.

According to the RA Defence Minister’s spokesman Colonel Sayran
Shahsuvarian, meetings with the RA President Robert Kocharian, Prime
Minister Andranik Margarian and Defence Minister Serge Sargsian are
scheduled within the framework of the visit.

The Greek delegation will attend the Museum Institute of the Armenian
Genocide, lay a wreath at the Memorial to the 1915 Genocide Victims,
and visit the Mother See of Holy Echmiadzin to meet with Catholicos
of All Armenians Karekin II.

RA Lost Security System

RA LOST SECURITY SYSTEM

A1+
| 15:31:52 | 01-10-2005 | Politics |

Former chairman of the NA permanent commission for foreign affairs
Hovhannes Hovhannisyan, who has held numerous meetings with leaders
of other states, insists that Europeans do not admit complementation
policy.

Chairman of the Liberal Progressive Party Hovhannes Hovhannisyan
considers that there was time when complementation was essential
for Armenia, but presently this policy may prove dangerous. “It is
especially dangerous at present, when serious geopolitical changes
are taking place. Such policy would make Armenia more vulnerable.”

H. Hovhannisyan considers that Armenia’s participation in the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) is senseless. He
explains it by the following fact: Kazakhstan, the second major CSTO
members is aspired for presidency in the organization. Armenia is
against it, since Kazakhstan pursues pro-Azerbaijani policy. Azerbaijan
is not CSTO member. Which state will Kazakhstan support if problems
arouse?

Proceeding from these conclusions the LPP leader says that the CSTO
has lost its actuality and the security system does not exist. He is
convinced that Armenia should take decisive moves towards the NATO,
the organization, which during 50 years has proved capable of solving
all the internal issues.

However in this case there exist some problems as well. There are NATO
members-states which rate oil as a priority factor. “is fifty states
unite and set the rules, no other state can break them. Azerbaijan
has oil. Thus the attitude towards this country will be always
special. We must keep it in mind. What can we offer instead of oil? Our
democracy?” he says.

The RA authorities do not wish to joint the NATO and admit the rules,
since corruption and disorder have no place in the NATO member-states,
H. Hovhannisyan resumed.

Ankara Speaks a Language of Threats to EU

AZG Armenian Daily #175, 30/09/2005

Turkey-EU

ANKARA SPEAKS A LANGUAGE OF THREATS TO EU

Turkish Delegation Will Not Leave for Luxemburg if the Phrase ‘Privileged
Partnership’ Is Not Removed from Documents

Speaking about European parliament’s resolution, Turkish Prime Minister
Tayyip Erdogan said: “This resolution is not mandatory. No matter what
resolution they passed, we shall not renounce our stance”. The International
Herald Tribune referred yesterday sources standing close to PM Erdogan
writing that the Parliament’s resolution was in fact a sting for him despite
PM’s outwardly calm response. The paper says that Erdogan at first wanted to
boycott the negotiations.

The representatives of EU member states tried to set the format of Turkey-EU
talks in Brussels yesterday. The EU ambassadors failed to come to a
unanimous decision. Meanwhile Austria proposed the status of “privileged”
partner, which Ankara rejected. Austria’s chancellor Wolfgang Schlussel
declared yesterday that his country will agree to start negotiations for
Turkey’s full membership if the EU reopens talks with Croatia halted because
of Zagreb’s refusal to hand a war criminal over to the Court of Hague.

The Great Britain, which holds the EU presidency, confirmed yesterday that
foreign ministers will meet on Sunday. In effect, the ministers will try to
save EU-Turkey talks slated in Luxemburg, October 3.

Abdullah Gul, Turkey’s foreign minister, called his British counterpart
earlier threatening that the Turkish delegation will not leave for Luxemburg
unless final negotiation documents lay bare on the table. According to
Hurriyet, the Turks will not leave for Luxemburg if EU does not remove
“privileged partnership” wording from the documents and does not withhold
Cyprus’ right for veto on Turkey’s participation in international meetings.

The September 28 speeches at the European Parliament as well as opinion
polls in different EU countries show that the Europeans are not inclined to
accept Turkey as a full member of the European family. Most of the French,
Germans and Austrians are against Turkey’s membership and the Danes would
prefer Ukraine to agricultural, Islamic Turkey. One of Greek deputies said
in his speech: “It’s inadmissible to make a positive decision hoping that
Turkey will some day become a democratic country. Following that logic we
can admit to EU countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Cambodia, Iran and other
undemocratic states”.

The International Herald Tribune writes that pessimism in Europe about
Turkey will deepen in near future. In case Angela Merkel wins the elections
in Germany her government will not go beyond “privileged partnership” with
Turkey. Presidential candidate in France, Nikola Sarkozy, is also against
Turkey’s membership.

By Tatoul Hakobian

Euro Parliament green lights Ankara’s EU talks, adds criticism

EuroNews – English Version
September 28, 2005

Parliament green lights Ankara’s EU talks, adds criticism

Even on the threshhold of formal discussions on joining together,
Europe and Turkey tensions continue. Parliament deputies in
Strasbourg have demanded that Ankara recognise the 1915 Armenian
genocide.

They also strongly criticised Turkey’s human rights record today.
‘Recognise Cyprus soon,’ they said. But the majority approved the
start of EU membership negotiations with Turkey next week.

The assembly postponed a vote to ratify Turkey’s extended customs
union with the EU. This was the doing of the conservative group,
which favours something short of full membership for Turkey in the
bloc. The postponement was a bid to put pressure on Ankara to open
its ports and airports to traffic from EU member Cyprus.

Meanwhile, EU governments remain deadlocked on a negotiating mandate
for the talks. Austria has informally linked its acceptance of the
start of the Turkey talks to an agreement to begin talks with
Croatia.

Ankara rejects anything less than full membership. Opinion polls show
a majority of EU citizens, especially in Austria, France and Germany
oppose this.Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan dismissed
parliament’s decisions as unimportant.

To seek an accord, diplomats say, an emergency meeting of the 25 EU
foreign ministers is likely on Sunday night. That is just hours
before the Turkish negotiations are meant to start, in Luxembourg.

Arlene Voske Avakian will be reading from her work in Montreal 10/17

The Simone de Beauvoir Institute
Concordia University

is pleased to have organized
a reading by

Prof. Arlene Voski Avakian,
Director, Women’s Studies, U. Mass. Amherst

On October 17, 2005
at 7:15 PM
MU 101
2170 Bishop
Montreal

Avakian is going to read from her work on her grandmother’s survival story
of the 1915-1923 Genocide of the Armenians

Copies of Arlene’s Lion Woman’s Legacy will be there as well.

Arlene Avakian’s reading is part of the Institute’s Genocide Seminar WSDB
498X/2/A that meets on Monday nights 6 PM to 8:15 PM.

Free admission!
———————————————————————–
For more on the Seminar contact the Institute
514-848-2424 ex. 2370, or 2373
See this article in Thursday Report on the co-organizers of the seminar.-

http://ctr.concordia.ca/2004-05/jul_28/12/

Rustamian: Accepting Turkey, EU stops being repository of values

Noyan Tapan News Agency
Sept 23 2005

ARMEN RUSTAMIAN: ACCEPTING TURKEY, EUROPEAN UNION STOPS BEING
REPOSITORY OF SYSTEM OF VALUES AROUND WHICH CREATED

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 23, NOYAN TAPAN – ARMENIANS TODAY. If today’s
Turkey which doesn’t correspond to European values. enter the
European Union, the European Union will stop being the repository of
the system of values around which that structure was first formed.
Armen Rustamian, a representative of the ARF Supreme Body of Armenia,
the Chairman of the NA Standing Committee on Foreign Relations stated
about this at the September 22 press-conference.

According to him, the fear of the peoples of France and Holland, that
the European Union can lose its essense being strengthened by means
of new bureaucratic mechanisms and becoming a political structure,
was one of reasons of failure of the referendum of the EU
Constitution in these countries. Particularly, interviews held in
France showed that the most part of those saying “no” sees danger in
Turkey’s membership to the EU.

According to Rustamian, if Turkey completely correspond to the
European system of values, it will recognize the Armenian Genocide
immediatly. According to him, refusal of the fact of the Genocide
shows that today’s Turkey doesn’t differ from the Ottaman Turkey, and
it’s not excluded that it should take similar steps again.

According to him, the issue of the Genocide can’t be considered as a
historical or moral problem as it’s more than modern and relates to
geographic-political developments of the South Caucasus and the whole
eastern region, That’s why, according to the rapporteur, the issue is
replaced on the political field and “cut off its source and reasons.”
“We should be able to touch upon the problem of the Genocide in right
time and in right way and never make it a subject of trade, a subject
of hagglings,” Rustamian stated.