Armenian Sheep Shearers Compete At Festival

BARRON’S
  • FROM AFP NEWS

Farmers from across Armenia gather for a sheep shearing festival in the southern Armenian Syunik region. Koryun Baghdasaryan, one of the competitors, says that while competition shearing is supposed to be fast, “the main thing is to shear accurately, avoid damaging the sheep’s skin and keep the wool clean”.

In Meeting with Putin, Pashinyan Discusses Grave Humanitarian Crisis in Artsakh

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi on June 9


“Armenia’s Sovereignty is Not Being Questioned,” Moscow Says

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met with President Vladimir Putin of Russia on Friday in Sochi, where he emphasized the worsening humanitarian crisis in Artsakh.

The two leaders were meeting on the margins of sessions of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council and the Council of Heads of Government of the CIS countries being held in the Russian port city.

“Unfortunately the humanitarian situation there [Nagorno-Karabakh] remains tense. There has been no gas and electricity in Nagorno-Karabakh for several months, the situation in the Lachin Corridor continues to be quite tense,” Pashinyan told Putin, emphasizing that Artsakh is under the “zone of responsibility” of the Russian peacekeeping forces.

He went on to underscore the worsening humanitarian situation in Artsakh, adding that a limited amount of food is being transported there by the Russian peacekeeping contingent.

Meanwhile, Russia’s Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk reassured Armenia that its sovereignty was not being questioned.

The Russian leader made the comments while summing up the result of meetings with his Armenian and Azerbaijani counterparts over the opening of transport links between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Saying that the meeting lasted nine hours, Overchuk said that a draft proposal was in the final stages of completion.

“There are a couple of contradictions which require additional discussions, specifically around issues related to where the railway will pass,” Overchuk said, adding that the railway will operate like any other ordinary rail line.

He also suggested that an agreement was reached on the customs control mechanisms, with border agents carrying out passport and customs checks.

According to Sputnik Armenia, the Russian leader was asked whether the Russian Security Service would be manning the borders, with Overchuk saying that “this would depend on Armenia.”

Gyumri to host opening ceremony of 8th Summer Pan-Armenian Games

 10:12, 9 June 2023

GYUMRI, JUNE 9, ARMENPRESS. The opening ceremony of the 8th Summer Pan-Armenian Games will be held in Gyumri.

The second-largest city of Armenia is getting ready to host the anticipated event.

Local authorities are reconstructing the road of the Shirak arena’s western section.

The Shirak Governor’s Office told ARMENPRESS that all necessary infrastructures are being renovated in order to organize the opening ceremony on a proper level.

The renovation of the road of the Shirak arena’s western section will cost 66,4 million drams.

The Governor of Shirak Province is personally supervising the work.

Armenuhi Mkhoyan




Flyone Armenia launches Yerevan-Tehran flights

 11:15, 6 June 2023

YEREVAN, JUNE 6, ARMENPRESS. Flyone Armenia national airline launched Yerevan-Tehran roundtrip flights on June 6.

The airline will fly from Yerevan’s Zvartnots airport to Tehran’s Imam Khomeini airport four times per week, on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays, offering affordable prices and convenient schedules for everyone.

Flyone Armenia Chairman of the Board Aram Ananyan personally visited Zvartnots airport Tuesday morning for the ribbon cutting ceremony marking the first flight to Tehran.

“The launch of Flyone Armenia’s direct flights from Yerevan to Tehran was a highly anticipated event and we are convinced that this new destination will be as highly demanded as the rest of our nearly two dozen travel destinations. The new flights will create a convenient transport alternative between Yerevan and Tehran, enabling to promote the strong cultural, economic and tourism ties,” Ananyan said at the ceremony.

Armenia is not Russia’s ally in Ukraine war, says PM Pashinyan

Reuters
June 2 2023
Reuters

TBILISI, June 2 (Reuters) – Armenia is not a Russian ally in the Ukraine war and is worried about the impact of that crisis on its relations with other countries, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said, drawing a cautious response in Moscow.

The tiny ex-Soviet nation in the southern Caucasus region has close security and economic ties to Russia, which have been further strengthened by its decades-long dispute with neighbouring Azerbaijan over the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Armenia is a member of the Moscow-led Collective Security Treaty Organisation (CSTO) military alliance, while Azerbaijan is not.

“We are not Russia’s ally in the war with Ukraine. And our feeling from that war, from that conflict, is anxiety because it directly affects all our relationships,” Pashinyan told CNN Prima News in an interview, adding that Armenia felt caught between the two sides.

“In the West they notice that we are Russia’s ally … in Russia they see that we are not their ally in the Ukraine war, and it turns out that we are not anyone’s ally in this situation, which means that we are vulnerable,” he said.

Asked about Pashinyan’s remarks on Friday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov responded with caution, saying Moscow had taken note of what he called “an important statement”.

“We know that there are certain nuances in Armenia’s approach to the conflict over Ukraine. We take them into account, we know them, but at the same time we continue to develop our allied relations with Armenia,” Peskov said.

Former Kremlin adviser Sergei Markov, commenting on Peskov’s statement, said on his Telegram channel that Moscow was “hinting that it sees that Pashinyan is leading Armenia away from friendship with Russia into the arms of Russia’s enemies”.

Armenia and Azerbaijan have resumed talks aimed at clinching a peace accord to resolve their dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, which is recognised as part of Azerbaijan but is populated mainly by ethnic Armenians.

Azerbaijan recaptured in 2020 chunks of territory lost in a conflict as Soviet rule collapsed in the early 1990s.

Reporting by Felix Light in Tbilisi; Writing by Gareth Jones; Editing by Alison Williams

Eurovision 2023: Sweden’s Loreen wins for second time

Save

Share

 03:08,

YEREVAN, MAY 14, ARMENPRESS. Sweden’s Loreen won Eurovision 2023 with the song “Tattoo” in Liverpool on Saturday, becoming the first woman to win twice in the contest.

Loreen is the only person after Ireland’s Johnny Logan to win the Eurovision song contest twice. 

Finland’s Käärijä came second with “Cha Cha Cha”, but he was still behind Loreen’s points after the results from juries from participating countries were announced.

Noa Kirel of Israel came third.

“I am seriously overwhelmed,” Loreen told reporters.

Armenia’s Brunette finished 14th with “Future Lover”. She received 5 points from Italy, 1 point from Latvia, 1 point from Austria, 1 point from Poland, 2 points from Moldova, 6 points from Ireland, 7 points from France, 3 from Estonia, 3 from Spain, 3 from the UK, 4 from Cyprus, 5 from Switzerland, 10 from Georgia, 10 from Albania and 8 from Czech Republic. With another 69 points from the jury, Brunette ranked 14th with 122 points.

Armenia gave to Israel.

RFE/RL Armenian Report – 05/15/2023

                                        Monday, 
Karabakh Leaders Slam EU
Nagorno-Karabakh - Karabakh Armenians rally in Stepanakert against the 
Azerbaijani blockade of the Lachin corridor, May 9, 2023.
Nagorno-Karabakh’s leadership accused the European Union late on Monday of 
turning a blind eye to Azerbaijan’s blockade of the Lachin corridor when it 
reacted to European Council President Charles Michel’s remarks made after the 
latest Armenian-Azerbaijani summit in Brussels.
Michel, who hosted the talks between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and 
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, made no mention of the five-month blockade 
that has caused serious shortages of food and medicine as well as an energy 
crisis in Karabakh.
Instead, he urged Baku to embark on a dialogue with “Armenians living in the 
former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast” for the purpose of “guaranteeing the 
rights and security of this population.”
“This fact shows that the president of the European Council not only does not 
hinder but actually encourages Azerbaijan to use the sufferings of the people of 
Artsakh as a political tool,” the Karabakh foreign ministry charged in a 
statement.
It said Michel’s remarks also demonstrate that “the EU leadership continues to 
ignore the legal rights and interests of the people of Artsakh and is guided 
only by its own geopolitical and short-term interests in the region to the 
detriment of the values of democracy and human rights proclaimed by the EU.”
The statement added that only international recognition of the Karabakh 
Armenians’ right to self-determination can be “the basis for a sustainable 
settlement of the conflict.”
The Armenian government stopped championing that right a year ago. Pashinian 
subsequently declared that it recognizes Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity.
Michel implied after Sunday’s summit that Yerevan is now also ready to recognize 
Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh. The Armenian opposition expressed serious 
concern over this declaration, renewing its allegations that Pashinian is 
forcing the Karabakh Armenians to live under Azerbaijani rule.
By contrast, the strongly-worded Karabakh statement contained no criticism of 
Pashinian.
Pashinian Under Opposition Fire After Fresh Talks With Aliyev
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
Beglium - Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian meets European Council 
President Charles Michel ahead of talks with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, 
Brussels, May 13, 2023.
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian took another step towards restoring Azerbaijan’s 
control over Nagorno-Karabakh during his weekend talks with Azerbaijani 
President Ilham Aliyev, the Armenian opposition claimed on Monday.
The four-hour talks hosted by European Union head Charles Michel in Brussels 
focused on an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty sought by Baku.
“The leaders confirmed their unequivocal commitment to the 1991 Almaty 
Declaration and respective territorial integrity of Armenia (29,800 square 
kilometers) and Azerbaijan (89,600 square kilometers),” Michel said after the 
meeting.
Azerbaijan’s total Soviet-era area cited by Michel includes Karabakh. This is a 
further indication that Pashinian’s administration is ready to recognize 
Azerbaijani sovereignty over the Armenian-populated territory.
Not surprisingly Baku seemed satisfied with the outcome of the latest 
Armenian-Azerbaijani summit. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry emphasized 
“Armenia’s acceptance of Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized territorial 
integrity.”
Tigran Abrahamian, a senior Armenian lawmaker representing the opposition Pativ 
Unem alliance, said this is consistent with Pashinian’s statements on the 
Karabakh conflict made over the past year.
Pashinian stopped invoking the Karabakh Armenians’ right to self-determination a 
year ago. Since then, he has spoken instead of the need to protect their “rights 
and security.”
Abrahamian described his rhetoric as a smokescreen for “surrendering Artsakh to 
Azerbaijan as smoothly as possible.” The Brussels meeting only highlighted this 
policy, he said.
The Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), a key member of the main 
opposition Hayastan bloc, expressed serious concern over Michel’s statement. In 
a statement, the party’s leadership accused Pashinian of helping Baku regain 
full control over Karabakh and force its residents to flee their homeland.
The statement argued that Armenia had signed the 1991 declaration cited by the 
EU chief with reservations relating to Karabakh. It also pointed to a 1992 
parliamentary act that bans Armenia’s governments from signing any document that 
would recognize Azerbaijani sovereignty over Karabakh.
Any Armenian-Azerbaijani agreement running counter to that decision would 
therefore be “null and void,” warned Dashnaktsutyun.
“It is obvious that we are entering the final phase of surrendering Artsakh,” 
claimed Vartan Oskanian, who served as Armenia’s foreign minister from 1998-2008.
“If Pashinian's hand is to be grabbed so that he does not sign such a document, 
then now is the time to do that. Otherwise it will be too late,” he wrote.
Andranik Kocharian, the pro-government chairman of the Armenian parliament 
committee on defense and security, downplayed Michel’s remarks on the 
Aliyev-Pashinian meeting.
“Armenia always recognized Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity … but Artsakh has 
its own territory and status,” Kocharian told reporters.
“Today Artsakh is probably the most independent state in the world; [it will 
remain so] for the next three or four years,” he claimed. “We’ll see what 
happens after that.”
In recent months Pashinian has publicly encouraged Karabakh’s leaders to 
negotiate with Azerbaijan while accusing Baku of planning to commit “genocide” 
in the region. The authorities in Stepanakert have repeatedly denounced his 
public pronouncements on the conflict.
Kremlin Upbeat On Russian-Armenian Ties
Armenia - People carry giant Armenian and Russian flags as they mark the 78th 
anniversary of Soviet victory over Nazi Germany, May 9, 2023.
Russia’s relationship with Armenia has a “bright future” despite current 
friction between the two allies, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov insisted over 
the weekend.
Peskov described bilateral ties as “advanced partnership” and a “special 
relationship that has deep historical roots.”
“We are convinced that they also have a bright future,” he told Russian state 
television.
“Of course, there are certain sensitive points,” he added without elaborating.
Russian-Armenian relations deteriorated in the last several months mainly 
because of what Yerevan sees as lack of Russian support in the conflict with 
Azerbaijan.
In an interview with the Russian opposition newspaper Novaya Gazeta published on 
Sunday, the secretary of Armenia’s Security Council, Armen Grigorian, accused 
Russia of not honoring security obligations to Armenia enshrined in bilateral 
and multilateral treaties.
Moscow is also not supplying Yerevan with weapons despite several defense 
contracts signed by the two sides, he said without going into details. The 
Armenian military has to look for alternative sources of arms supplies because 
“we are not receiving what we ordered from Russia and what we paid for,” added 
Grigorian.
The rift between the two nations deepened further in March after Armenia’s 
Constitutional Court gave the green light for parliamentary ratification of the 
International Criminal Court’s founding treaty. The ruling followed an arrest 
warrant issued by the ICC for Russian President Vladimir Putin over war crimes 
allegedly committed by Russia in Ukraine.
Moscow warned that recognition of The Hague tribunal’s jurisdiction would have 
“extremely negative” consequences for Russian-Armenian relations. Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian’s government appears to have refrained from sending the treaty 
to the Armenian parliament for ratification.
Pashinian was among the leaders of several ex-Soviet states who joined Putin in 
attending the May 9 military parade in Moscow that marked the 78th anniversary 
of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany. Peskov said afterwards that Putin and 
Pashinian held a separate meeting during the celebrations.
EU Envoy Hopes For Armenian, Azeri Troop Withdrawals
        • Anush Mkrtchian
        • Ruzanna Stepanian
Armenia - Andrea Wiktorin, head of the EU Delegation in Armenia, speaks during a 
news conference in Yerevab, .
Not only Azerbaijan but also Armenia should withdraw troops from contested areas 
along the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, a senior EU diplomat said on Monday.
Azerbaijani troops seized chunks of what Armenia regards as its internationally 
recognized territory during border clashes in 2021 and 2022. Speaking shortly 
after the deadliest of those clashes that broke out in September, the EU’s 
foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, acknowledged that they “occupied part of 
Armenia’s territory” and demanded their withdrawal from those border areas.
Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister Paruyr Hovannisian said on Monday that Yerevan 
expects to get back a total of 139 square kilometers of land as a result of 
mutual recognition by the two South Caucasus of each other’s territorial 
integrity reaffirmed by their leaders during weekend talks in Brussels.
European Council President Charles Michel, who hosted the talks, said Armenian 
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, agreed, 
among other things, to revive joint efforts to demarcate the heavily militarized 
border.
Andrea Wiktorin, the head of the EU Delegation in Armenia, essentially equated 
Armenia with Azerbaijan when she commented on the matter during a joint news 
conference with Hovannisian.
“It is really important to come to an agreement,” she said. “Actually it is our 
hope that both sides will withdraw their troops and embark on the work of the 
delimitation and demarcation.”
Asked to elaborate on her comment, Wiktorin said: “It was clearly stated [at 
Brussels] that there are one or two spots where also Armenian forces are, let’s 
say, in border areas and there needs to be a very clear delimitation and 
demarcation.”
Armenia - Yerevan-based foreign military attaches visit an area in Armenia's 
Syunik province where Armenian and Azerbaijani troops are locked in a border 
standoff, May 20, 2021.
The diplomat did not specify those “spots,” saying that she is not aware of 
further details of Armenian-Azerbaijani peace talks.
Hovannisian seemed bemused by Wiktorin’s remarks. “I also find it hard to tell 
what this is about,” he said.
Andranik Kocharian, the chairman of the Armenian parliament committee on defense 
and security, countered, for his part, that it is Baku that occupied Armenian 
territory after the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh.
“What I know is that Armenian troops are where they must be at the moment,” he 
said. “What I know is that Azerbaijani troops violated Armenia’s sovereign 
territory. Again, what is ours is ours.”
In further comments to the press made after his news conference with Wiktorin, 
Hovannisian suggested that the EU envoy referred to several small enclaves 
inside Armenia which were controlled by Azerbaijan in Soviet times and occupied 
by the Armenian army in the early 1990s. Baku wants to regain control over them 
but has yet to clarify whether it is ready to give up a bigger Armenian enclave 
occupied by Azerbaijani forces in 1992.
“It is clear to everyone that at this stage we are talking about [Azerbaijani] 
troop withdrawal from Armenian territory,” stressed Hovannisian.
Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.
 

“Snatching the maximum from Armenia”: opinions on the escalation on the border with Azerbaijan

  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenian-Azerbaijani escalation in Sotk

Tensions remain on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border. On May 12 the Armenian Ministry of Defense reported in the afternoon that the Azerbaijani Armed Forces again violated the ceasefire in the direction of Sotk by using a UAV. Two Armenian soldiers were wounded. Then shelling of Armenian positions was reported around village of Kut, Gegharkunik region, at about 16:50. As of 20:00, units of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces continued shelling Armenian positions located in the Kut and Sot directions.

Armenian analysts believe that the escalation is an instrument of pressure on Yerevan before negotiations, the purpose of which is to achieve additional concessions. Azerbaijanist Tatevik Hayrapetyan explains the logic behind the actions of the Azerbaijani authorities as follows:

“They say we are going to negotiate, then they change the situation on the ground, and then change the nature of the talks.”

On March 11 the Armenian Defense Ministry reported an intensive shelling of its positions in the direction of Sotk from artillery and mortars. The ambulance transporting the Armenian wounded was also fired upon. Four Armenian soldiers were wounded. Azerbaijan reported on May 11 one dead and one wounded. After noon, the situation had relatively stabilized. However, in the evening, the Armenian Defense Ministry again reported shelling from the Azerbaijani side using mortars and artillery in the direction of three border settlements. There were no significant ceasefire violations during the night.


  • Escalation on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border
  • Next Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels: experts do not expect a breakthrough
  • Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan disagree in Washington, but US Secretary of State optimistic

Azerbaijan expert Tatevik Hayrapetyan says that Baku is resorting to escalations to change the content of the negotiations and advance its interests:

“When Azerbaijan understands that, for example, Armenia is ready to recognize Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan, and the Armenian authorities openly declare this, Azerbaijan thinks of how to snatch even more from Armenia.

“There is a high risk that after the elections in Turkey, in the event of a possible re-election of Erdogan, Azerbaijan will undertake more large-scale military operations.”

On May 14, the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet in Brussels through the mediation of the head of the European Council, Charles Michel. Five-party talks are scheduled for June 1 with the participation of the President of France and the Chancellor of Germany. Negotiations are planned with the mediation of Russia. On May 19, a meeting of the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan is scheduled in Moscow.

Negotiations continue in the US between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, but what next?

This is the opinion of MP Tigran Abrahamyan, secretary of the opposition parliamentary faction “I have the honor”. Reminds that Baku began to interfere with the work of the mine a month ago. According to him, the Azerbaijani side is trying:

  • to shut down the mine,
  • take full control of the mine.

In his opinion, having gained full control, Azerbaijan will try to use the mine both to meet the needs of its own economy and to “create a more difficult military situation”:

“These heights are very important, the control of Azerbaijan here can create a much more difficult situation in this direction.”

According to the deputy, it is also problematic for the Armenian side that Azerbaijan is trying to present Vardenis and a number of other settlements in the Gegharkunik region as the so-called “historical Azerbaijan”.

“I think this is being done not just for the sake of propaganda, it is preparing the ground for resorting to aggression in this direction at some stage,” Abrahamyan asserted.

Azerbaijan has installed a Checkpoint on the Lachin road — international and local response to the situation

From Azerbaijan they report that “Armenia went on a provocation”, and this became the reason for the shelling of Armenian positions. Political scientist Tigran Grigoryan says that even in Azerbaijan such statements are not taken seriously. He believes that they do not convince the countries mediating the negotiations either:

“Baku’s attempts to legitimize its actions are failing. It is clear that with the existing military-political balance, Armenia logically cannot take such steps. Armenia does not have such opportunities to escalate the situation or try to get some dividends by escalating the situation on the ground.”

He also believes that the purpose of the escalation on the eve of the negotiations is to put pressure on Yerevan, to force Armenia to make concessions on the main issues on their agenda.

An Azerbaijani soldier kills a guard at a mineral plant in the Syunik region after he and a colleague strayed into Armenia

Commenting on Azerbaijan’s actions around Sotk, Deputy Foreign Minister Paruyr Hovhannisyan said that the mission of EU civilian observers deployed on the Armenian border to monitor the situation could not react in any way. It acts within its mandate, that is, regularly visits the border areas and prepares situation reports:

“Their presence is already an investment in terms of improving the situation. This creates a psychologically safer atmosphere at the border.”

The diplomat said that escalating tension prior to negotiations is “not a new way of doing things for Azerbaijan”:

“I have been working in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs since 1995 and I do not remember a single round of negotiations without such provocations before or after the meeting. Unfortunately, such a tradition has developed.

Next Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels: experts do not expect a breakthrough

  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels

Brussels officially confirmed that on May 14 the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan will meet through the mediation of the head of the European Council, Charles Michel. Although negotiations between Nikol Pashinyan and Ilham Aliyev have not yet taken place, Western mediators have already announced the possibility of their continuation in Chisinau on June 1, and then, in October, in Granada with the participation of the French and German presidents.

Russia is also stepping up mediation efforts. Talks between the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan are expected in Moscow on May 19.

On the other hand, the Armenian authorities have recently been increasingly saying that “there is no progress on the key issues.”

Armenian political scientists also believe that it is not worth expecting resolution of differences between the parties in the near future. They consider “Azerbaijan’s maximalism” to be the main obstacle to progress in the negotiation process.

Pashinyan and Aliyev last met in February in Munich. The meeting was mediated by the US Secretary of State. The latest talks between the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan took place on May 1-4 in Washington. As a result of four days of discussions, Ararat Mirzoyan and Jeyhun Bayramov did not sign a joint statement. However, in the United States, the talks were considered constructive and announced that the delegations participating in them had made significant progress in solving complex problems. Yerevan and Baku believe that “positions on key issues still diverge.”


  • Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan disagree in Washington, but US Secretary of State optimistic
  • Madrid Principles: Interpretation of Pashinyan, Former Armenian Foreign Minister and Expert
  • “The language of threats and terror does not work with Azerbaijan” – Ilham Aliyev

Armen Grigoryan, Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia, told journalists that the discussion that began in Washington will continue in Brussels.

“I think that all meetings, negotiations around the peace treaty are a continuation of each other, because it is known what issues will be discussed,” Grigoryan stated.

He said that during the Washington meeting it was not possible to agree on the most important issues:

“This is the fixation of 29,800 square kilometers of the sovereign territory of the Republic of Armenia, and the creation of the Stepanakert-Baku international mechanism, and the creation of international guarantees [of the implementation of the agreements reached]. Pay attention to the current situation: the elements of the November 9 [2020] tripartite declaration on the cessation of hostilities in Karabakh, signed with the mediation of Russia, cannot be achieved. For example, in the Lachin corridor, according to the trilateral statement, Azerbaijan should not be there, but it is there at the moment.”

As for the forthcoming Armenian-Azerbaijani talks in Brussels, Grigoryan believes that Armenia intends to “bring approaches as close as possible and move forward.”

The Prime Minister of Armenia also talked about disagreements with Azerbaijan. According to Pashinyan, the positions of the parties do not fundamentally coincide regarding ensuring the rights of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh and creating an international mechanism that guarantees the fulfillment of the points of the peace treaty.

“Of course, there is some progress. If earlier there was 1 km between the positions of the parties, now it is 990 meters. This is progress, but the discrepancy is still huge.”

Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels

Negotiations continue in the US between the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan, but what next?

Political scientist Tigran Grigoryan believes that there will be an attempt in Brussels to continue the discussion on key issues and bring the positions of the parties as close as possible, but he does not share the mediators’ optimism:

“There will be an attempt to have in the near future some kind of ready-made text [of a peace treaty] that can be signed. But there are some serious disagreements. I do not think that the parties will be able to come to any compromise or any acceptable agreement, especially on the creation of an international mechanism for direct negotiations on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue.”

Grigoryan also considers it unlikely that “Baku will agree to withdraw its troops from the territories of Armenia occupied since May 2021.”

He notes that on this issue “the differences between the parties are deeper”, so it is difficult to imagine how a compromise can be reached.

Grigoryan recalls that the positions of Yerevan and Baku also differ greatly on the issue of maps that can be used to delimit the border.

“Armenia talks about the recognition of state administrative borders and refers to the maps of the last years of the existence of the USSR. Azerbaijan talks about the so-called “historical maps” and “implementation of delimitation on Azerbaijani terms.” Perhaps, as a result of the intervention of mediators, it will be possible to slightly soften Azerbaijan’s position, but I consider this unlikely, ”he said.

According to Grigoryan, during the meeting in Brussels, special attention will be paid to the topic of unblocking regional roads.

Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels

Political scientist Areg Kochinyan believes that the biggest obstacle to progress in the negotiation process is “Azerbaijani maximalism”:

“Baku is intoxicated with victory in the war and is trying to get everything at once. Destructive behavior and maximalist expectations of Azerbaijan cause great damage when discussing unresolved issues. In particular, the issue of the status of Artsakh and guarantees of security and rights of Artsakh Armenians. Moreover, unlike the issue of status, on the issue of guarantees of ensuring rights in the international community there is a certain understanding of what it should be and it is important that it be.”

According to Kochinyan, the problems lie in the details – what this mechanism should be:

“Will this mechanism be a contingent with a certain right to protect people, some kind of observation mission or some kind of technical and legal complex? So far, there is no concrete answer as to what the international mechanism that should ensure the security and rights of Artsakh Armenians will be.”

https://jam-news.net/pashinyan-aliyev-meeting-in-brussels/

AW: Injustice

The view from the top of Cascade, overlooking Yerevan and Mount Ararat (Photo: Varak Ghazarian)

Injustice done to those so close to home. An injustice that has allowed further injustices to persist. Injustices done prior, allowing this injustice to take place. Injustices on the grandest level, affecting millions, forever altering the paths of the future of a people and its land. Altering its course, yet further deepening the injustice, the hatred, the fear. Allowing it to persist endlessly and rather worsen as time passes. 

When will the next injustice take place, and how will we choose to stand against such an injustice? How can we call ourselves humans if we don’t allow our humanistic side to shine? We pride ourselves on being such advanced and evolved beings and that we are so much greater than animals, but we continuously choose to let our animalistic side reign supreme. Fear, flight or fight, territorialism, inability to establish trust, survival instincts. With such animalistic behaviors, we choose to allow our primal instincts to take over and dictate our lives and future and thus never look past our basic instincts.

How can we allow these injustices to take place and simply decide to stand idly by, or even worse, aid such injustice? To be given a demand or to be presented with an uncomfortable situation, we are thought to believe that we had no other choice and that we were simply just doing what we were told to do. However, we always have a choice in life. Even if the choice might be death, we always have a choice. Yet, we as a human race have decided to trudge on and choose the choice which is the easiest for us; obey and stay obedient. To sit idly by or aid killings, destruction, massacres, violence and genocide. 

When will it stop? When will we decide as a whole that enough is enough? To push aside our animalistic approach to life and allow our humanistic side to shine? Simple. When we say, “Enough is enough.” Kill us all if it must be, and you can sit alone on your throne in this world all for yourself. When we rise up to the apparent evil and disallow it from growing. Disallowing it to hit the ground and begin to root itself in the soil we walk on and spread like an infectious disease to everything that neighbors it. We must be like the wind, and uniformly sweep evil away and blow it somewhere far. Somewhere so far that anything of its nature will never be able to implant in the minds of us humans. 

For if we were to change our mindset and perspective toward such evil, we will never allow it to sow its rotten roots in our minds and souls. Rather, we should choose beauty and love to implant into every corner of the world. To entrench its roots deep into this earth through the constant watering and care we display for it. For one day, this beauty will allow us to take our full form as humans. To take the shape we need to take, in order to thrive and become the beings we think we are today. 

I have and will no longer stand idly by. I no longer fear what the choice of going against injustice will bring, because the fear of simply sitting idly by and watching is far greater. To see what the world will come to due to another injustice isn’t worth seeing. For if death may come of it, so be it, because that is the price I will pay to defend what I believe in. The world may be dark and full of terrors because that is what we have allowed to persist through our constant mismanagement of justice. But it is on us to make the switch, to resist, and thus allow our humanistic side to shine.

Varak Ghazarian is an Armenian-American from Los Angeles who attended a Armenian school his entire life. Upon his graduation from UC Berkeley, he volunteered in Armenia for year with Birthright Armenia. He spent time in Artsakh for a month, where he mentored teenagers in border villages about fundamental topics of health. He currently lives in Armenia, which has opened up a door of imagination that was closed off elsewhere.