IMF Okays Third Tranche Of $60 Mln Stand-By Loan For Armenia

IMF OKAYS THIRD TRANCHE OF $60 MLN STAND-BY LOAN FOR ARMENIA

Interfax
Nov 3 2009
Russia

The board of directors of the International Monetary Fund has approved
a third tranche of a stand-by arrangement for Armenia worth 37.72
million SDRs (about $69 million), the IMF’s Yerevan bureau said in
a press release.

The tranche was made available following a second review of the
implementation of the program. Taking the approved tranche into
account, the overall worth of IMF loans, provided to Armenia, will
reach 310.94 million SDRs, or about $479 million.

The IMF on March 6 2008 upheld a 28-month $540 million stand-by program
for Armenia. And it increased the sum to $822.7 million on June 22. The
IMF loan is intended for five years with a three-year grace period,
at a 1.56% annual interest on the first 270 million, 2.56% interest on
the following $135 million and 3.56% on the remaining part of the loan.

"The global crisis has continued to have a serious impact on the
Armenian economy," the IMF bureau in Yerevan said, citing Takatoshi
Kato, the IMF’s Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chair.

"While output appears to be stabilizing, the fall in remittances and
the collapse in the construction sector have caused a more severe
economic contraction and lower fiscal revenue than anticipated
in the first review. In light of continuing weak domestic demand,
the authorities will maintain fiscal easing this year, with external
resources taking up the revenue slack. As external conditions improve,
growth is expected to resume gradually in 2010," Kato said.

The IMF recommended that Armenia continue reforms, especially in the
tax and finance sectors.

NKR MFA Information Department Chief Marsel Petrosian’s Commentary O

NKR MFA INFORMATION DEPARTMENT CHIEF MARSEL PETROSIAN’S COMMENTARY ON THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN SABAH TURKISH NEWSPAPER

Ministry of Foreign Affairs
2009-11-03 11:09
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic

A Turkish popular proverb reads that a man going to the hell seeks for
a friend. Azerbaijan found this friend long ago – it’s Turkey, the core
of their relations being not the implementation of the principle of
"one nation, two states" or impartial and stable friendship, but their
hatred towards Armenians, in particular, their pathologic attempts
to undermine the international image of Nagorno Karabakh.

>From this viewpoint, the October 20 article by a certain Nazyl Hyldrjak
published in SABAH Turkish newspaper isn’t accidental at all.

According to the article, it appears that from the 11th century up to
the 1800s Karabakh was under the Turkish authority. Though the same
article emphasizes quite needlessly that "Tayip Erdogan has bright
memory", however, the Turkish newspaper’s memory is questionable.

Otherwise, they would remember that between the 11th century and the
1920s of the 20th century their predecessors were repeatedly defeated
in Karabakh and its approaches, and saving their lives, they cut and
ran without glancing back.

The fact that Azerbaijan has a great experience in distorting
and falsifying historical matters and events is well-known. So, to
console fraternal Azerbaijan, the Turkish SABAH, excelling its younger
brother, demonstrates a bright example of disseminating fabrications,
misinforming and misleading its multi-thousand readers. Probably,
the newspaper’s editorial staff is well aware of its readers’ being
ignorant of the historical events related to the region. So, they
can be inspired with any nonsense, such as the misinformation that
Karabakh was once part of the Ottoman Empire, and when it passed to
Russia, 95% of its population made the Turks.

SABAH newspaper’s hyperbolic imagination has no limits. Outbidding
the Azerbaijani mass media in this issue as well, the newspaper blames
Russia for allegedly expelling the Turkish population from Karabakh in
the past centuries, instead populating this territory with Armenians.

Fortunately, this newspaper doesn’t know from what planet the Armenians
have arrived in this region. If it knew, it would surely write about
this too. With a small dash of the pen, the newspaper trebles the
number of Azerbaijanis displaced as a result of the Karabakh war,
bringing it to 1,5 million. Moreover, it turns out that the ancient
manuscripts kept in the Shushi Museum were stolen by Armenians. The
newspaper considers it needles to note what alphabet the nomadic
tribes (now Azerbaijanis), which had no script of their own, used
while creating those manuscripts in the ancient period and what
they represent.

The newspaper also keeps silence about the Azerbaijanis’ atrocities
towards the peaceful Armenian population of Sumgait, Baku, Kirovabad,
Maragha, and tens of other settlements. Instead, the newspaper
considered it to be its sacred duty to touch upon the events in
Khojalu, surely, exaggerating sufficiently the number of killed
and wounded and representing Armenians as monsters. Naturally,
we shouldn’t expect true information about the Karabakh events from
SABAH newspaper. Certainly, it will not state that Armenians provided
the civilian population of Khojalu with a special corridor for safely
leaving the scene of the military actions and that the tragic events
took place not in the territory of Khojalu, but at the approaches
to Aghdam – a territory controlled by the Azerbaijani armed forces,
specifically, by the hordes of the Azerbaijani National Front. How
could the Armenians guess that for the change of the leadership, the
National Front adventurers could open fire on their own compatriots
and kill the unarmed and helpless people? Maybe, the "hotheads"
of the Azerbaijani National Front had no alternative for coming to
power – they would, first, ascribe the incident to Armenians, then,
which is most important, will blame the authorities for their criminal
indifference about ensuring the security of the Azerbaijani civilian
population. Generally, the Azerbaijanis filled the Internet with false
propaganda of the so-called "Khojalu Genocide", its main organizer
being the State Heydar Aliyev Foundation, which, in particular,
for exaggerating the situation, used outright forgery and presented
the photos of disfigured corps in Kosovo as those of the Khojalu
tragedy victims.

SABAH newspaper seems to be infected with senile marasmus from the
Azerbaijani media, since they have similar symptoms. Otherwise,
it would have slightly cited Ayaz Mutalibov – the ex-president of
Azerbaijan and another hater of Armenians. However, the Azerbaijani
National Front leaders should be given credit for their calculations
with extremely high precision. The SABAH deliberately keeps deathly
silence about all this and instead, as if by chance, writes: "Maybe,
the Turkish Public Television should start showing a TV serial about
the occupation of Nagorno Karabakh and the pogroms in Khojalu?"

Surely, coming forth with a suggestion is not a sin. A sin is
distortion of the truth. I don’t think that SABAH newspaper can
ever remit its sins. But, it’s worth striving for this, at least,
for self-cleaning. And maybe, the Turkish Public Television should
start its TV serials with the events of 1915? Will SABAH newspaper
ever have the courage to come forth with such a suggestion?

As for Turkey’s position on Karabakh, the NKR takes it, to say the
least, with cool indifference.

ANKARA: Nalbandian Claims Nagorno-Karabakh And Turkish-Armenian Rela

NALBANDIAN CLAIMS NAGORNO-KARABAKH AND TURKISH-ARMENIAN RELATIONS ARE SEPARATE ISSUES

Journal of Turkish Weekly
Nov 2 2009

Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian has stated that the
improvement of Turkey-Armenia relations and the Nagorno-Karabakh
issue are completely separate processes. Rejecting Turkish calls
for concessions over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Nalbandian said
that this would not be given in exchange for the recently signed
rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia.

Speaking in an interview in Yerevan, the Armenian foreign minister
stated that since the negotiations were over, both Yerevan and Ankara
were obliged to open the border and move to establish diplomatic
relations, as was agreed. "Why did we sign two protocols if we
are not going to ratify and implement them?" Nalbandian asked. He
continued, "I think the whole international community is waiting for
quick ratification and implementation and respect for the agreements
which are in the protocols…If one side will delay and create some
obstacles in the way of ratification and implementation, I think it
could bear all the responsibility for the negative consequences."

The rapprochement protocols, signed October 10, caused trouble between
Turkey and its ally Azerbaijan, which is embroiled in a conflict with
Armenia over Nagorno-Karabakh. According to those familiar with the
situation, Turkey is hoping for at least some progress in the peace
negotiations over the region. The international mediators involved
in the conflict, the United States, Russia, and France, state that
progress is being made between Yerevan and Baku, but the chance of
an imminent solution is slim.

Japanese Ambassador To Armenia Hands Over His Credentials To The Arm

JAPANESE AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA HANDS OVER HIS CREDENTIALS TO THE ARMENIAN PRESIDENT

ARMENPRESS
Nov 2, 2009

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 2, ARMENPRESS: Japanese ambassador to Armenia
Masaharu Kohno (residence Moscow) handed over his credentials to the
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

Presidential press office told Armenpress that congratulating the
ambassador on assuming the office, the president said that Armenia
is interested in boosting Armenian-Japanese relations. Serzh Sargsyan
thanked the Japanese government for the support to Armenia.

"The grants, technical support and the privileged credits provided by
the Japanese government are of big importance for us. I particularly
highlight the program of upgrading of the Yerevan thermo power plant
which will give Armenia’s economy an opportunity to develop and will in
some extent smooth the social tension," the head of the country said.

President Sargsyan said that in development of bilateral economic
relations there is much to be done. In this respect the president
underscored the visit of the Armenian foreign minister to Tokyo,
noting that it will give an opportunity to continue the political
dialogue and discuss opportunities of boosting the cooperation in
different spheres. The parties agreed that the two countries have
great potential for economic cooperation which must be fully used.

The ambassador said that he will do his best for the further
development of bilateral relations. The interlocutors also exchanged
thoughts over the Armenia-Turkey relations.

Peter Semneby: ‘Urrent Situation Between Armenia And Turkey Cannot L

PETER SEMNEBY: ‘URRENT SITUATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND TURKEY CANNOT LAST FOREVER

ArmInfo
2009-11-02 12:59:00

ArmInfo. The current situation between Armenia and Turkey cannot
last forever, everyone have to adapt to normalization, open borders,
and so on, EU Special Representative for South Caucasus Peter Semneby
says in an interview with "Vremya Novostey".

"It’s necessary to consider how to protect and develop own interests in
region under new situation. The war in Georgia showed that proceeding
territorial conflicts bring great risks. This developing moved
Armenian- Turkish relations," he says.

When asked whether Russian influence in Caucasus fines down due to
normalization between Armenia and Turkey, Peter Semneby said so far
as Russia invests in Armenia’s infrastructure and builds railways it
can benefit only from open borders.

Agopyan family wins 60-year lawsuit

AGOS WEEKLY, Istanbul
Oct 25 2009

Agopyan family wins 60-year lawsuit

25 Ekim 2009

Fighting through legal channels for the return of their property in
Tarabya that was confiscated by the Treasury in 1949, the Agopyan
family won a legal battle that has been going on since 1991.

When 11 of the family’s 25 acres of land in Kirecburnu and Tarabya
were transferred to the Treasury during the cadastral surveys in 1949,
the land owner Marten Agopyan had filed a lawsuit. Then, while the
lawsuit was still in progress, the events of September 6-7, 1955 came
to pass and the family had to leave for the U.K.

After the death of Marten Agopyan, his son Bedros Agopyan restarted
the legal struggle. The court ruled for return of the land to the
Agopyan family in 2005. The Treasury filed a lawsuit for `annulment of
title deed’ against this decision, but the court rejected the
Treasury’s request on January 2008. The Treasury then appealed the
decision. During the course of the legal process, on June 18, 2008,
Bedros Agopyan passed away. Agopyan’s wife and daughters intervened in
the lawsuit after his death.

Agopyan family’s attorney Cafer Gül answered our questions regarding
the lawsuit.

In a news story in Agos newspaper dated January 11, 2008, we reported
that Bedros Mardiros Leon Agopyan had managed to take back 8,5 of 24
acres of land, winning the title deed annulment lawsuit filed by the
Treasury, and that the court had rejected the counter lawsuit of the
Treasury. How did the process go on after that date?

After we won the lawsuit, the Treasury demanded retrial on the grounds
that Agopyan’s father made a speech in Bucharest to provoke people
against the Ottomans before World War I. Considering that Marten
Agopyan never went to Bucharest and was a U.K citizen, the Sariyer
Civil Court of First Instance rejected the request for retrial. Then,
they applied to the Court of Appeals, but the decision of the Sariyer
Civil Court of First Instance was sustained. So, there was no reason
to renew trial. Now the Treasury has the right of correction of
decision, and we are waiting for that.

The land is gained back in part. What are your expectations for the rest?

We primarily deal with lost lands. We’ve managed to take 8,5 acres so
far, and there are 15,5 acres lost. We recovered them partially. There
are lands registered in the name of municipalities and individuals. We
are waiting for enactment of a new law regarding the return of
minority properties or compensation for lost ones. Otherwise, we will
resort to the ECtHR because the land cannot be recovered. We filed a
lawsuit in Civil Court, but we could not recover the land. Thus we
have come to the end of local legal channels, and we have to resort to
the ECtHR.

There are many buildings on the land. What will happen to them?

We applied for prevention of action on the land, but our request for
destruction was rejected. We won the lawsuits filed for compensation.
They paid partially, and there are ongoing trials. We collected part
of the payments.

Son of an Armenian family from Kayseri, Marten Agopyan established a
bank in the early 1900s in Istanbul, but went to Romania with his
family upon the British Consulate’s warning that `we cannot ensure
security of your life against Germans’ at the beginning of the First
World War in 1914. The family had returned to Istanbul after
non-Muslims were given the right of property as part of the foundation
of the Turkish Republic.

Fear of police curbs Armenian dissent

Institute for War & Peace Reporting, UK
Oct 30 2009

FEAR OF POLICE CURBS ARMENIAN DISSENT

Opposition say they are subjected to police persecution and their
business supporters are intimidated.

By Gegham Vardanian in Yerevan

Armenia’s political opposition, which was strong enough to dominate
the streets of the capital just last year, has withered away, the
result, its activists say, of heavy-handed police repression.

During mass protests against the results of 2008 presidential
elections, in which official results recorded opposition candidate
Levon Ter-Petrosian as losing heavily, clashes between activists and
police resulted in ten deaths.

Dozens of activists from the Armenian National Congress, ANC, which
backed Ter-Petrosian, were arrested. Most have now been released, but
Armin Musinian, Ter-Petrosian’s spokesman, said 16 were still behind
bars.

`In Armenia, being in the opposition means working in conditions of
complete terror. The special services are monitoring your actions; the
police are following you; your comrades are imprisoned and beaten up;
small, medium and large businessmen supporting you are faced with
economic terror; and television is practically closed to you,’ he
said.

The ANC is considered the more radical wing of the country’s
opposition, while two opposition parties ` Heritage and Dashnaktsutiun
` both have seats in parliament. They all say they face police
persecution, although Dashnaktsutiun left the ruling coalition only
this year in protest against a peace deal with Turkey.

Ter-Petrosian’s spokesman said crime in the country had risen by 40-50
per cent in the last year as a direct result of the surveillance.

`Instead of doing their jobs, the police are only taking action
against political nonconformists. Naturally, thieves, pickpockets and
fraudsters are taking to this like fish to water,’ Musinian said.

`The police have fully become a political instrument. Under the
current regime the concepts of the state and the government have
become the same.’

The opposition, he said, was frustrated by this constant attention. He
said that in 2008 the ANC had 94 times asked for permission from the
Yerevan administration to hold a demonstration, and been refused every
single time. It is a serious accusation, but not one taken seriously
by President Serzh Sargsian’s allies.

`At these protests they always repeat the same words about the bright
future of the nation and the country. They say that as soon as they
come to power, everything will be set right. But people do not believe
these protests and actions,’ said Galust Sahakian, who heads the
parliamentary deputies of the president’s Republican Party, with heavy
sarcasm.

`The government also does not pay too much attention to these protests
and actions. These are repetitive, boring and ineffective acts.
Therefore control by the authorities is unnecessary.’

At the Yerevan municipal elections this summer, the ANC received a
solid 17.4 per cent of the vote, ahead of Dashnaktsutiun, which polled
just 4.5 per cent, but far behind the Republican Party, which won 47.3
per cent, and Prosperous Armenia, the other pro-government party, with
22.7 per cent.

The authorities this year began to allow the ANC to hold occasional
protests, although these have become rarer in recent months. Analysts
say the movement, which is made up of 17 small parties, has given up
hoping for Sargsian’s resignation and was preserving its strength for
parliamentary elections in 2012.

The ANC’s leading position in opposition has been taken by
Dashnaktsutiun, which was so angered by the signing of a `road map’
towards peace with Turkey in April that it left the ruling coalition.
The party is particularly strong in the Armenian diaspora, and its
supporters see the deal as a betrayal of the demand that Turkey
recognise as genocide the mass killings of Armenians at the end of the
Ottoman period.

However, analysts say it is not an effective opposition force.

`This party for ten years was in power and was connected in different
ways to the government, so it cannot go into deep opposition,’ Yervand
Bozoian, a political analyst, said.

Armen Badalian, another analyst, said, `People see that when there are
ANC protests all the roads into Yerevan are closed so people from the
regions cannot get to the demonstrations. When there are
Dashnaktsutiun protests, this has not happened. Everyone sees that no
one interferes with Dashnaktsutiun in holding its protests. This might
be normal in a civilised country, but we have other ideas here.’

Dashnaktsutiun is currently pushing for the resignation of Foreign
Minister Edward Nalbandian, who spearheaded the peace negotiations
with Turkey and signed the protocols that should lead to diplomatic
relations being established. Vahan Hovhannisian, head of
Dashnaktsutiun’s parliamentary group, dismissed any suggestion that it
was less sincere in its opposition than the ANC.

`The opposition is divided into those who want regime change, because
they themselves want to be head of the state, and those who just want
to change the course of the current authorities. We are the latter,’
he told IWPR.

He said that the opposition’s freedom of action was severely
restricted, especially when it came to getting their points across to
a television audience.

`There is censorship, and bans on the broadcast of certain opinions
and themes by certain people. This affects, in particular, the six
weeks of so-called discussion of the Armenia-Turkey protocols,’ he
said, adding that only Erkir Media, the party’s own television
station, had broadcast his party’s point of view.

Badalian, the political analyst, said that, while Dashnaktsutiun had
its television channel, ANC had access to the printed media, and
several newspapers supported its position.

`This gives a certain amount of power, which ANC has used well. But in
Armenia the press has little weight,’ he said, adding that the most
widely-read opposition paper, The Armenian Times, has a circulation of
just 7,000, and that does not amount to much in a country with three
million people.

`The printed media is more party-political. However, it is also freer.
The audience is small, which is why the authorities have left it in
peace,’ said Stepan Safarian, head of the parliamentary group of the
opposition Heritage party.

His party has seven deputies, which, along with the 16 from
Dashnaktsutiun make up a small opposition corner in the 131-member
chamber.

`Formally speaking, a political group calling itself the opposition
can work well in parliament. However, parliament itself does not play
a large role in social and political life,’ he said.

Levon Zurabian, a representative of the ANC, cast doubt on the motives
of Dashnaktsutyun, suggesting it was still allied with the government,
but raised hopes that the whole opposition could unite behind one
figure to challenge Sargsian in the future.

`Many people in that party are definitely against [the government’s]
course, and it is possible that the party could move from these
theatrical actions to more serious activities with an aim to restore
legitimate government in the country,’ he said, suggesting that the
ANC could cooperate with its opposition rivals.

But Bozoian, the analyst, doubted any union between the opposition
groups could succeed. He said Armenia lacked the strong institutions
it requires to tolerate a strong opposition.

`In Armenia there is a strong executive branch with broad powers,
which does not let the state develop politically and economically,’ he
said.

Gegham Vardanian is a journalist from Internews Armenia.

Property Rights Focus Of Training Course Supported By OSCE Office In

PROPERTY RIGHTS FOCUS OF TRAINING COURSE SUPPORTED BY OSCE OFFICE IN YEREVAN

armradio.am
31.10.2009 11:33

Some 35 representatives of state and civil society organizations,
lawyers, judges, international and local experts discussed how the
right to property is applied in Armenia and international standards
for such rights at an OSCE-supported training course that started
today in Yerevan.

A non-governmental organization, the Armenian Institute for
Development, organized the two-day event, with support from the
OSCE Office in Yerevan, the Netherlands Helsinki Committee, the
International Centre for the Legal Protection of Human Rights, the
American Bar Association and the British Embassy in Armenia.

Participants discussed how to ensure that public and individual
interests are adequately balanced and considered during the urban
and spatial planning development process. The event focused on how
local courts apply the provisions of the European Convention for
Human Rights.

"Protection of property rights is a fundamental human right and is
critical to the establishment of the rule of law and for economic
development," said the Head of the OSCE Office in Yerevan, Ambassador
Sergey Kapinos. "Armenian legislation and practice must protect
individuals from disproportionate interferences with the right to
property, as required by the European Convention for Human Rights."

Arthur Grigoryan, a defence lawyer who led the training course, said
legal analysis of recent cases of property being claimed for public
interest showed that the legislative regulation was insufficient, and
that domestic legal remedies failed to protect the affected property
owners. He said he hoped that ongoing efforts by the authorities
would provide adequate protection.

VivaCell-MTS Passes The Second Phase Of 3G Network Delivering In Arm

VIVACELL-MTS PASSES THE SECOND PHASE OF 3G NETWORK DELIVERING IN ARMENIA

PanARMENIAN.Net
30.10.2009 12:23 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ VivaCell-MTS completed the next stage of introducing
the third generation (3G) network in Armenia. Now the services of 3G
network will be accessible in all marzes of the country, VivaCell-MTS
management told a press conference in Sevan today.

The 3G mobile network introduced by VivaCell-MTS is the widest
3G coverage in Armenia. Technically it is the most advanced
state-of-the-art network in the country based on the UMTS/HSPA system
(Universal Mobile Telecommunications System/High Speed Packet Access).

Launched by VivaCell-MTS on April 17th, 2009, 3G network has been
operating successfully in Yerevan, as well as Gyumri and Vanadzor. Now
the services of the third generation network are also available in
47 towns and rural communities – from Meghri to Bagratashen.

Taking the popularity of 3G phones among our subscribers and the daily
growing demand for third generation services into account, particularly
what refers to high speed and wireless mobile internet, VivaCell-MTS
continuously increases the number of NODE B third generation sites
with their majority having been installed in the marzes. Along with
the introduction of the 3G technologies the Company also improves the
quality of services that have been provided during the last 4 years
by the 2.5G network.

Furthermore, taken the constantly growing number of VivaCell-MTS
subscribers (exceeding 2 million as of September 30th, 2009), the
company continues to update the 2.5G network by increasing the number
of BTSs.

Within the 3G network coverage VivaCell-MTS subscribers will have
access to all services so far available within the 2.5G network,
and also the novice services like the "Videocall" that gives the
interlocutors a chance to see each other and high speed mobile internet
enabled by the connection of a mobile phone or MTS-Connect wireless
USB flash modem. Moreover, the modem gives access to wireless internet
anywhere, and allows access to the latest news and entertainement
services through VivaCell-MTS wap portal. In case of being outside the
3G coverage MTS-Connect enables using internet via GPRS/EDGE system.

VivaCell-MTS 3G network reaches 47 towns and large rural communities
of Armenia’s marzes in addition to Yerevan, Gyumri and Vanadzor.

"There’s no place too far to reach! On April 17th while launching
our state of the art 3G network in Guymri, Vanadzor and Yerevan we
promised that it was only the the beginning and that the rest of the
regions will be covered, today we deliver the promise. Despite all
the challenges we again strive to provide our subscribers with the
state of the art 3G network all over the country. I am confident, the
accessibility of third generation services particularly to residents
of farther towns and large villages will open new perspectives to
everyone," mentioned VivaCell-MTS General Manager Ralph Yirikian.

After the press-conference the journalists had the opportunity
to try the innovative services offered by VivaCell-MTS, which
will significantly increase also the productivity of the mass media
performance, who will be able to send information from the most distant
borderland regions of Armenia to Yerevan in the fastest possible pace.

Armenia Ratified Agreement On Establishment Of EurAsEC Anti-Crisis F

ARMENIA RATIFIED AGREEMENT ON ESTABLISHMENT OF EURASEC ANTI-CRISIS FUND

Gazeta.KZ
Oct 30 2009
Kazakhstan

Today, the National Meeting of Armenia ratified the agreement on
establishment of the EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund, Kazakhstan Today agency
reports citing Armenia News.

"The National Meeting also ratified the agreement on management of
the EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund’s assets."

According to Vice Minister of Finance of Armenia, Vardan Aramyan,
the funds will be controled by the Eurasian Bank of Development.

Total sum of the initial payments of the state-founders is $8 billion
513 million. Russia’s contribution – $7.5 billion, Kazakhstan – $1
billion, Belarus – $10 million, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Armenia –
$1 million each."Kyrgyzstan will pay 90 % in the form of bills.