Spain Hosts Genocide Commemorative Events

SPAIN HOSTS GENOCIDE COMMEMORATIVE EVENTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
May 3, 2012 – 18:11 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – Spain hosted a number of events dedicated to the
97th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

On April 29, commemoration evening was held at Barcelona’s Santa Maria
del Pi Church, RA MFA reports. The event launched with a mourning
liturgy and was followed by prayers by representatives of Catholic,
Protestant and Lutheran Churches.

The cultural program featured performances by soloist of National
Academic Opera and Ballet Theatre Anahit Mkhitaryan and prominent
Spanish organist Juan de la Rubia.

From: A. Papazian

A War That Has Been Neglected Since 1994

A WAR THAT HAS BEEN NEGLECTED SINCE 1994
BY HOVHANNES NIKOGHOSYAN

MAY 3, 2012

Using the infamous quote of former British Prime Minister Neville
Chamberlain, this story below is about “a quarrel in faraway
countr[ies] between people of whom we know nothing”. And this
is not about Europe of late 1930’s, but about the periphery of
Europe of 2012. I marked this quote listening to a Member of the
Legislative Assembly from Northern Ireland, Mr. John McCallister,
who was delivering a speech about the conflict settlement process in
Northern Ireland at the Organization for Security and Co-operation
in Europe (OSCE)-hosted Ministerial conference in Dublin on April 27.

Fortunately enough for all Irishmen, who suffered three decades of
Troubles in their recent history, through the inclusive contribution of
international mediators, and chief of them US Senator George Mitchell,
as well as the maturity of the leaderships in London, Belfast, and
Dublin, they became able to seal the Good Friday Agreement in 1998.

When foreign diplomats or my fellow colleagues from political science
disciplines elaborate on commonalities between the conflict in Ulster
and others in, for example, the former Soviet Union areas, including
Nagorno Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia (both now partially
recognized by few states), and Transdniestria, I always pinpoint on
two key differences: a) decisive international involvement; and b)
maturity of political and community leaderships.

A smoldering conflict is often not about absence of any peace
initiatives. It is substantially about an unwillingness of either
of the parties to commit to negotiated agreements once out of the
meeting room. This is especially true about the peace talks on Nagorno
Karabakh, where the geography of negotiations since the ceasefire
was established in 1994 (and even between the war of 1992-94) covers
the most beautiful cities on the planet-Rome, Helsinki, Prague,
Lisbon, Moscow, Paris, Key West, Madrid, etc.-while any progress is
hardly visible. A “no war, no peace” situation has been the only and
appreciated result of peace talks, which is now under increasing risk
to erupt into conflict as both sides are engaged in a Cold war-style
“deterrence” with extensive military buildup.[1]

Instead of going into the substance of current talks, here I want to
offer another key difference, which still makes it impossible to heal
wounds of enmity.

One of the most tragic events in the Troubles, “Bloody Sunday” of
January 1972, may serve as an example to show one difference between
Great Britain and Azerbaijan-two metropolises that had been trying
to keep their conflict regions inside the common area. While after
“Bloody Sunday” the Westminster immediately rushed into whitewashing
the tragedy and justifying the killings of mostly unarmed civilian
protesters in the streets of Derry, the Tony Blair Cabinet established
the so-called Saville Inquiry in 1998, which came out with a final
report in 2010 and contained rightful and lawful elaborations on the
“usual suspects”. This bloody event might be much similar to what
happened in Sumgayit, a town in still Soviet Azerbaijan in February
1988, where Armenians were being executed for the sake of their
ethnic origins, just because few days before, on February 20, the
legislature in the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) capital
Stepanakert applied with a petition to the Kremlin to re-join Soviet
Armenia. The same policy of pogroms against Armenians later unfolded
in Baku, Kirovabad, and other cities and villages of Azerbaijan in
the late years of the Soviet Union’s existence. Though the Soviets
staged some prosecutions to punish anti-Armenian pogroms in Sumgayit
(and not anywhere else), only few suspects got prison terms for
“hooliganism and mass riots”. Instead of blaming and shaming for
the ethnic cleansings, which might have put the follow-up events
into another channel, most suspects were freed in the courtrooms or
sentenced to conditional terms. Absence of any “Saville Inquiry”,
and moreover a policy of whitewashing the history and blaming
Armenians themselves “for provocations that led to pogroms”, is what
qualitatively distinguishes the Karabakh case from the success story
in Northern Ireland. This is what I think the next similar conference,
hosted by Irish Chairmanship of the OSCE, will need to address.

Before conflicting diplomats and mediators may come to terms for
conflict resolution, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Nagorno Karabakh are
still fighting.

The official releases from the Armenian Defense Ministry reported on
April 27 that the Azerbaijani army has been shelling with sniper and
artillery fire the borderland villages of Tavush region in Armenia,
including onto a school and kindergarten.[2] Three soldiers of the
Armenian army are reported to have been killed, another one wounded.

Azerbaijani officials and the media indirectly confirmed the
incident.[3] The Armenian Foreign Ministry urgently asked the Personal
Representative of OSCE CiO to dispatch an emergency monitoring mission
to the Armenia-Azerbaijan border.[4] The two OSCE observers were
already in place on April 30 and recorded the incidents carefully.

Recalling the vocabulary of the so-called Caroline affair, common
in international law to describe justifications of legitimate
self-defense, now the threat to Armenian frontlines is imminent.

Immanency is vested on daily violations of ceasefire regime, including
the recent shelling upon the borderland school and kindergarten,
where ordinary civilians must enjoy the protection of their government
against any threat to their life and health by any force- internal or
external. This quite simple erga omnes obligation is enshrined in any
Constitution across the globe, which gave rise to “Responsibility
to Protect”, or R2P doctrine, affirmed by UN Security Council in
Resolution 1674 (2006). As parliamentary elections in Armenia are
due on May 6, this inflammable situation is specifically bold and
affects the domestic political stability and threatens the national
security more than ever, leaving for this tiny country in the Caucasus
no other option than to engage militarily.[5]

Serzh Sargsyan, the President of Armenia, has already manifested an
“inevitable” and devastating answer to punish for the ceasefire
violation,[6] while OSCE Minsk Group co-Chairs (in attendance to
OSCE Dublin conference on April 27) rushed to urge the parties
“to abstain from retaliatory measures”.[7] The co-Chairs, who have
attracted much criticism for a long time now, didn’t utter anything
about strengthening the ceasefire regime monitoring capabilities.

When there are no early warning mechanisms or permanent observer
missions established on site, the sides will always remain prone to
resuming the conflict.

This is exactly the time when the international community should urge
Azerbaijan to comply with long-negotiated confidence-building measures
– pulling back snipers[8] and allowing installation of ceasefire
violation mechanisms to avoid any new escalation that the region
is obviously rushing into while international conferences discuss
“success stories”.

Notes

[1] Military expenditure in the South Caucasus; Stockholm International
Peace Research Institute 2011

[2] News.am agency, 26/04/2012

[3] News.az agency, 30.04.2012 (in Russian)

[4] News.am agency, 28/04/2012

[5] Panarmenian News Agency, 28/04/2012,

[6] Panorama.am News Agency, 27/04/2012

[7] Statement of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, 27 April 2012

[8] Armenia ‘Still Ready’ For Sniper
Withdrawal In Karabakh, RFE/RL, November 25,
2011
ml

From: A. Papazian

http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/05/03/a-war-that-has-been-neglected
http://www.sipri.org/yearbook/2011/files/SIPRIYB1104-04A-04B.pdf
http://news.am/eng/news/102879.html
http://1news.az/politics/karabakh/20120430015641090.html
http://news.am/eng/news/103258.html
http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/105253/
http://www.panorama.am/en/society/2012/04/27/serzh-sargsyan-mil/
http://www.osce.org/mg/90140
http://www.rferl.org/content/snipers_karabakh_armenia_azerbaijan/24402333.ht

Republican Party Candidate – Deep Pockets And Married To Police Chie

REPUBLICAN PARTY CANDIDATE – DEEP POCKETS AND MARRIED TO POLICE CHIEF’S DAUGHTER
Grisha Balasanyan

hetq.am
12:40, May 2, 2012

Artur Gevorgyan, a candidate of the ruling Republican Party, is
running for a seat in parliament in Yerevan’s 5th Election District.

Despite his young age, Gevorgyan has amassed a sizeable amount of
financial resources when compared to his opponents. Another asset
in his favour is that he’s the son-in-law of RA Chief of Police
Vladimir Kasparyan.

Gevorgyan has a number of real estate holdings, including a 634 square
meter private house.

In his financial disclosure statement, Gevorgyan lists his 4 million
AMD salary as his only source of income.

As of March 1, his cash holdings amount to 43 million AMD, $945,000
and 239,000 Euros. Surprisingly, Gevorgyan claims to own no stocks
or other securities.

Souren Sirounyan, his election opponent, is unemployed and reports
no assets at all, either fixed or movable. He reports 5 million AMD
in bank deposits.

Hovhannes Hovhannisyan, a third candidate in the race, is also
unemployed. He does report a house in the Dzoraghbyur village of
Kotayk Marz.

Hovhannisyan claims no movable assets and bank deposits totalling
2.8 million AMD.

From: A. Papazian

Turkish Prof: Turkey’s Thesis Denying Armenian Genocide Sin

TURKISH PROF: TURKEY’S THESIS DENYING ARMENIAN GENOCIDE SIN

Panorama.am
02/05/2012

Turkish Prof. Kemal Cicek said Ankara cannot refute the thesis of
Armenians on Armenian Genocide, Dogan news agency report said. Kemal
Cicek attended a conference on Armenian issue in the city of Kyoln.

“To deny Armenian Genocide is our official thesis. But it’s sin,
without any content. Alas, Turkey has no strategy on this issue.”

Cicek said Turkey is unable to oppose worldwide published books,
information materials on Armenian Genocide.

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijan’s Ultimatum To U.S.

AZERBAIJAN’S ULTIMATUM TO U.S.
Naira Hayrumyan

Story from Lragir.am News:

Published: 15:34:32 – 02/05/2012

Azerbaijan enhances aggressive attacks against the world community
trying to sell its oil and gas at a higher price. The intention is
natural, it is only necessary to find out who will pay for the gas
the high price set by Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan may reconsider its pro-Western stance, and reconstruct
into a “new block” if it doesn’t receive more support, especially
on the issue of conflict with neighboring Armenia. The head of the
foreign department of the Azerbaijani presidential administration
Novruz Mammadov told Bloomberg. He noted that Azerbaijan was asked
to join another political union but “for now it does not care for
this proposal”.

“We expect Western support for the settlement of the Karabakh issue,”
said Mammadov.

President Obama nominated State Dept. Advisor on energy issues
Richard Morningstar as ambassador in Azerbaijan. Morningstar does not
hide that his activities will be directed at persuading Azerbaijan,
Turkmenistan and Iraq to direct their gas into the pipes which provide
gas to Europe bypassing Russia and Iran.

Actually, Azerbaijan gave an ultimatum. It will sell gas to Europe,
it will even agree with a Transcaucasia gas pipe only if the West
helps to resolve the Karabakh issue.

This condition had been put forward before. For example, the former
U.S. Ambassador Matthew Bryza repeatedly called to resolve the Karabakh
issue, to pave the way for the Armenian-Turkish relations and energy
projects. But international actors, even the U.S.

administration is not in a hurry with this decision, preferring to
separate these three problems.

Why does Russia, the U.S., Europe or even Iran, refuse Azerbaijan’s
conditions and insist on the settlement of the Karabakh issue? Once
Moscow tried to do that but it clashed with the resistance by the U.S.
and Iran. Now, apparently, Moscow also refuses trade with Baku over
Karabakh.

Karabakh is a trump card. Without Karabakh, the Turkish-Azerbaijani
belt will close which will continue to the north in the Russian
Caucasus and to the east in Central Asia. None of the international
players will benefit from the creation of such zones which was not
allowed earlier in the 20th century and will not be allowed now.

So, Baku needs to get ready either to give up preconditions on Karabakh
in the energy negotiations or he will be forced to do that under the
threat to isolate Baku. Morningstar will evidently fulfill this task.

Europe also helps him. Azerbaijan’s authorities have been at “a
cold war” with Germany for a couple of weeks. The target of attacks
by pro-governmental mass media became the German ambassador to
Azerbaijan Herbert Quelle because of his participation in a meeting
with representatives of Western diplomats with the opposition of the
Public Chamber.

It is unknown what the destiny of Eurovision in Baku will be. A lot
of European leaders have already announced to boycott the European
Cup in Europe, the same may happen to Baku. The European politicians
are already speaking about the inexpediency to hold the contest
in non-democratic Baku. No one complained that Armenia refused the
contest.

So, Eurovision may be the failure of the ultimatum of Baku’s policy
which will be made clear that everything has its price in the world.

If claims are too many, it is possible to remain with nothing.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments26022.html

Envoy: Armenia Ready To Develop Inter-Parliamentary Ties With Kuwait

ENVOY: ARMENIA READY TO DEVELOP INTER-PARLIAMENTARY TIES WITH KUWAIT

PanARMENIAN.Net
May 2, 2012 – 14:32 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – On April 30, Armenian ambassador to Kuwait Fadey
Charchoghlian met with the country’s National Assembly speaker Ahmed
Al-Sadoun.

Discussion of inter-parliamentary cooperation between the two
countries was in focus of the meeting. Ambassador Charchoghlian
stressed Armenia’s readiness to increase the number of bilateral
visits on parliamentary level, underscoring the importance of Mr.

Al-Sadoun’s visit to Armenia, which will mark a new stage in
inter-parliamentary cooperation.

Armenia’s envoy further dwelt on the recent developments regarding
Nagorno Karabakh conflict, ties with Turkey and the forthcoming
parliamentary elections in Armenia.

Kuwaiti official, in turn, hailed Armenia’s efforts towards peaceful
resolution of the conflict.

From: A. Papazian

Turks Find The Reason Of Failures In Their Fight Against Kurdish Reb

TURKS FIND THE REASON OF FAILURES IN THEIR FIGHT AGAINST KURDISH REBELS

arminfo
Wednesday, May 2, 14:20

Turkish mass media have found the reason of their army’s failure
in the fight against Kurdish rebels. Sabah newspaper reports that
Turkey blames Armenia and Iran for its failures as they allegedly
supply the PKK fighters with Russian and Iranian weapons.

Turkish newspaper writes that during the recent operation conducted by
the Turkish security forces in the Hakkari province the PKK militants
used M-DN 11 grenades made in Iran and F-1 grenades made in Russia.

The captured militants say they have been recently receiving assistance
from Iran. Wounded Kurdish fighters receive treatment at Iranian
hospitals in Urmia Province.

In addition, over 400 fighters crossed the Iranian-Armenian border
as well as the border near Nakhijevan recently, the paper writes.

From: A. Papazian

Azeri Film Fest Causes Storm In Armenia

AZERI FILM FEST CAUSES STORM IN ARMENIA
By Sara Khojoyan

Institute for War & Peace Reporting
CAUCASUS REPORTING SERVICE, No. 638
April 25, 2012
UK

Attempt to build cultural bridges sparks anger, though it’s unclear
whether protests were genuine or stage-managed.

A controversial festival of Azerbaijani films has finally taken place
in Armenia, but not before the venue had to be switched following
angry protests.

The Caucasus Centre of Peacemaking Initiatives, CCPI, an Armenian
organisation, was planning to show the films in several towns in the
north of the country on April 12 and 17.

CCPI director Giorgy Vanyan said the screenings were intended to
promote tolerance and peace.

Relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan have been consistently poor
since the war over Nagorny Karabakh, which ended in 1994 with a truce
but no lasting peace deal.

Feelings of mistrust and resentment run so high in both countries
that most forms of engagement with the neighbouring state are seen
as akin to treason.

The four short films included in the festival were made in 2007-08 by
different directors, and did not touch on the Karabakh conflict. “The
films address social problems and human rights issues in Azerbaijan,”
Vanyan said.

After the screenings were announced, however, protesters took to the
streets of Gyumri and then Vanadzor.

In Gyumri, Vanyan was forced to cancel the April 12 showing at the
Asparez Press Club, to get the crowds outside to disperse. Video
footage posted on YouTube showed him surrounded by heated protesters.

One man tries to attack him but is dragged away by others.

In Vanadzor, some 200 people held a march against the April 17
screening and its hosts, the Helsinki Civil Assembly, HCA, throwing
eggs and stones at the proposed venues.

Demonstrators and other opponents of the festival accused its
organisers of betraying Armenia by showing films from Azerbaijan.

“I believe that no normal Armenian with a sense of decency and clear
view of things will want to see a festival of Azeri films in our
country,” Yury Ghulyan, a lecturer at Vanadzor’s teacher training
institute, said. “In Azerbaijan, they abuse and slander our country
and our good name. So it’s just pointless bringing Azeri films to
show them here.”

Karen Vrtanesyan, who blogs on Azeri-Armenian relations, has
long opposed the festival. On his Facebook page, he claimed that
peacebuilding events of this kind were unilateral, and that in
Azerbaijan, “hate propaganda” directed at Armenians was on the
increase.

Referring to events in the village of Maraga during the Karabakh
war in April 1992, he said that “on the eve of the 20th anniversary
of mass killings of civilians, no country would allow a ‘cultural
event’ by the side that conducted these pogroms. The issue here is
not tolerance, but a premeditated assault on the public’s feelings.”

The reactions were to be predicted. This film festival was supposed to
have taken place in late 2010, but the strength of public opposition
meant no venue could be persuaded to host the screenings. (See Azeri
Film Festival Cancelled in Armenia .)

CCPI eventually succeeding in rescheduling the Gyumri screening,
holding it before a small audience in a restaurant outside town.

After the April 16 scuffles in Vanadzor, the New York-based advocacy
group Human Rights Watch urged the Armenian authorities to investigate
the “mob attack” on HCA’s office.

The CCPI said it had been the victim of a “campaign of intimidation,
slander and disinformation”, and said the protests were not
spontaneous, but staged by local government officials.

“This public opposition was incited,” Vanyan told IWPR. “There is no
constitutional order in Armenia – it has been replaced by a ‘patriotic’
court martial.”

Artur Sakunts of the Helsinki Civil Assembly, who took the decision
to call the Vanadzor screening, said police had been notably absent
when his office was besieged by protesters.

“Although we called them, police took no action to prevent threats
to our employees’ safety, or to stop the incitement to violence
and public disorder, despite the fact that we called them,” said a
statement from his office.

Sakunts said that in both Armenia and Azerbaijan, “the regimes use
cheap populist devices to divert public attention away from the real
problems facing their countries”.

Officials in the two towns denied any connection to that protests.

Gagik Simonian of the Vanadzor municipality said the local authorities
were only informed of the planned protest on the morning of April 16,
shortly before it took place.

“They were acting in line with the law, so there wasn’t anything we
could do about it,” he said. “But we are in no way connected with
these events.”

Opponents of the festival insisted they were acting on their own.

Tigran Kocharyan, a blogger, said Azerbaijanis “at the highest level”
insulted Armenians with no come-back, whereas “tolerance is demanded
only from the Armenians”.

“You need two sides to hold a dialogue,” he added, noting that in the
last two decades, Azerbaijan had never held an analogous festival of
Armenian films.

Since making concessions would be seen as a sign of weakness in
Azerbaijan, he said, then “yes, we must give an appropriate response
to everything they do.”

Levon Barseghyan of the Asparez Press Club said the protesters may
well have had genuine concerns about the festival, but he pointed
out inconsistencies in the level of outrage.

“These same people who were protesting, shouting, and punching Vanyan
never complained about the Turkish and Azeri films that were shown
in Armenia as part of the Golden Apricot festival, or indeed other
screenings. Nor did they protest against cultural exchanges,” he said.

Sara Khojoyan is a reporter for ArmeniaNow.com.

From: A. Papazian

‘To Know Wisdom And Instruction: Library Of Congress’ Exhibit Celebr

‘TO KNOW WISDOM AND INSTRUCTION: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS’ EXHIBIT CELEBRATES 500TH ANNIVERSARY OF ARMENIAN PRINTING
By Aram Arkun

Mirror-Spectator Staff
Posted on May 1, 2012 by Editor

Levon Avdoyan at the opening reception for the exhibit

WASHINGTON – The 500th anniversary of Armenian printing this
year provides an opportunity to highlight the prominent early role
Armenians, who at that time already had lost statehood and had their
homeland come under foreign rule, played in the Near East in this
field. It also is an opportunity to present some of the fruits of
centuries of Armenian literary and cultural work. While the United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
selected Yerevan as this year’s world capital book city, there are
exhibitions and conferences taking place throughout the world. In
the US, the Library of Congress, thanks to the efforts of curator Dr.

Levon Avdoyan and a team of staff members, inaugurated a beautifully
designed exhibit on April 19, titled “To Know Wisdom and Instruction:
The Armenian Literary Tradition at the Library of Congress.” It will
remain on display until September 26 of this year, Monday-Saturday from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. There is no charge for access to this exhibit.

The exhibit includes 76 items from as early as the 14th century,
and as late as 2010. The early manuscripts on display show that
Armenia had a long and illustrious literary tradition which quickly
was transformed by the adoption of printing. The exhibit includes
the first complete Armenian-language printed bible from Amsterdam
(1666), the first modern Armenian novel, the first transcription
of the Armenian liturgy with European musical notation in the 19th
century, an 18th-century phylactery or prayer scroll and various rare
19th-century publications. Maps, such as one of Yerevan in the early
20th century, sheet music and modern diasporan, Ottoman, Soviet and
post-Soviet Armenian books and periodicals show the vitality and
range of Armenian printing. Non-printed items such as manuscript
illuminations, elaborately embroidered fabrics, musical recordings
and photographs highlight the richness and range of the Library
of Congress collection. The exhibit is accompanied by a 100-page
illustrated catalogue compiled by Avdoyan, available at the library
gift shop or at amazon.com.

The exhibition is in a prominent area of the Library of Congress that
already is attracting tourists and passers-by. Avdoyan noted that all
kinds of people are visiting, and hopefully are being educated. One
woman asked, for example, whether Armenia was a country. Of course,
many groups of Armenians are also planning visits, and Avdoyan is
providing guided tours to those who make arrangements in advance.

The exhibition and catalog, like all others produced by the
Library of Congress, were sponsored by outside grants. In this case,
Armenian-American foundations were the sponsors, including the Dolores
Zohrab Liebmann Fund, the Dadian Fund of the Library of Congress, Roger
Strauch and Julie Kulhanjian Strauch, the Vartkess and Rita Balian
Family Foundation and the Sami and Annie Totah Family Foundation.

An evening pre-opening reception on April 18 with Dr. Vartan
Gregorian, president of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, as
keynote speaker attracted approximately 160 people, while another 160
people, coincidentally, attended the next day’s lectures. Dr. Kevork
Bardakjian (Marie Manoogian Chair of Armenian Language and Literature
at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor) delivered the 16th annual
Vardanants Day Lecture on the Armenian alphabet and literary identity,
on April 19, followed by curator Avdoyan’s discussion of the continuity
and change of Armenian identity in “the digital age.” A free concert
by Armenian cellist Narek Hakhnazaryan (tickets are required through
ticketmaster.com) will help celebrate the exhibition and the Armenian
cultural heritage on May 19 at 2 p.m.

The idea of the exhibit originated with Avdoyan, who submitted it
internally through an application process. The library welcomed the
idea. Avdoyan pointed out that “not every country has had an exhibit
at the Library of Congress. This is unusual and is an honor for the
Armenians.” Furthermore, this exhibit is the first in a new series
by the library in its yearlong Celebration of the Book.

Following the acceptance of the project by the library, Avdoyan
lay the matrix for the exhibition and selected items that would
illustrate the theme of the Armenian literary tradition, both from
the Near East Section’s collection of Armenian-language items and
other curatorial divisions such as the Geography and Maps Division
and the Music Division.

Avdoyan began working at the Library in 1977, and as the reference
specialist for Classics, Ancient History, and Byzantine and Mediaeval
Studies in 1982. After 10 years, he became the Armenian and Georgian
Area Specialist, a position he continues to hold today. He actually
is the first to hold this position in the Library, though there were
Armenian cataloguers before him, and during his tenure, the collection
grew from over 7,000 to 45,000 items (comprising 16,300 unique titles)
in the Armenian-language. These items are accessible to readers in the
African and Middle Eastern Reading Room, while non-Armenian language
items pertaining to Armenians are held in different divisions of
the library.

Avdoyan pointed out during this interview that the library’s Armenian
collection is of fairly recent origin. It only possessed some 200 items
before a committee of Armenian Americans chaired by Arthur Dadian
and including noted scholar Sirarpie Der Nersessian was created in
1948 to assist the Armenian language collections at the Library of
Congress. Libraries in other countries have much older collections,
yet the Library of Congress has now turned into a major resource
for Armenian studies. This exhibition serves to call the attention
of scholars worldwide to this resource, in addition to informing a
broader public. Avdoyan is very proud that the Library “is a very
democratic institution. Anyone over the age of 16 can use it, whether
American or not, and without the need for documentation, letters or
recommendation, or similar items. One photo ID and 10 minutes later
you have a user card.”

Avdoyan’s job as area specialist, he explained, includes “anything
associated with the preservation, acquisition or service of the
Armenian collections, general reference and anything involving special
events.” For example, he created the Vardanants Lecture Series in 1994,
and represents the Library at important conferences. He gives briefings
about the collection, and seminars on Armenia for the government. He
also recommends items in non-Armenian languages for other Library
of Congress reading rooms. He helps provide reference information to
visitors and responds to long-distance requests for help.

Avdoyan purchases books for the library from Armenia, Europe and the
Middle East through various vendors around the world, and also engages
in exchange programs. He said, “We do work very closely with partner
libraries in Armenia, especially in book exchanges. We now have 14
exchange partners.” The American embassy in Armenia will transport
books exchanged from Armenia to the United States. Avdoyan feels that
though Armenian-language printing declined initially after Armenian
independence, it has increased again (though it is not as prolific
as in the Soviet period). The cost of new Armenian-language books
has gone up, while their print runs have generally decreased.

Avdoyan is constantly trying to fill in the gaps in the library’s
collections. He said, “We always welcome gifts. Last fall we received
two manuscripts, fabrics and silver objects from American-Armenians
whose ancestors brought these items after the Armenian Genocide. Three
are in the present exhibit.” The library preserves and maintains such
rare items. Although there is a limited budget for purchase of older
items, Avdoyan feels it has been ample for what he has found.

The Library of Congress is not a lending library, so Armenian items
will always be accessible to visitors. However, as the collection
increases in size, more items will be placed in off-site storage
because of space shortages in the library. It generally takes one
day for an item to be brought to the reading room from storage, so
readers have to order such items ahead of time. Avdoyan is allowed
to decide which items are suitable for transferal to storage.

Digitalization may eventually be a partial solution, but at the
moment, it must be largely paid for by outside funds. Avdoyan said that
arranging for it to take place is a matter of workflow in the Library
of Congress. Furthermore, the technology itself is still immature and
being perfected. There is not, for instance, an acceptably reliable
optical character recognition software for the Armenian language,
according to Avdoyan.

from other institutions as well as all sorts of other cooperative
programs. The Library of Congress has also already bought every
microfilm item commercially available on Armenian topics.

Avdoyan became interested in Armenian studies and history from an
early age. His grandparents on both sides of the family were from
Kharpert and Bitlis. He spoke Armenian while a very young child
in his birthplace of Providence, but he and his sister stopped
speaking after their family moved to Florida. He said, “I’ve always
been interested in history. Even in grade school, I loved history,
especially ancient history.”

Avdoyan went to the University of the South in Sewanee, Tenn. as an
undergraduate to study history, and a visit to Dr. Nina Garsoïan of
Columbia University to inquire about how to learn Armenian led to an
invitation to study there. His doctoral dissertation, later published
as a book in 1993, was a translation and analysis of the medieval
Armenian work, The History of Taron. He spent many years learning
languages such as Classical and Modern Armenian and Greek, French,
Georgian, German, Italian, Latin and Russian.

Avdoyan became Columbia Prof. Morton Smith’s research assistant
for several years, which provided an opportunity to learn research
methodology in ancient history. He said that the switch to working in
a library was not that hard. One of his first positions in the Library
of Congress was as a library examiner in its Copyright Office. When he
became a reference specialist, he said, “I came in knowing the sources
and research methodology for my subjects of expertise. It was not all
that hard to transfer that knowledge. It took about a year to learn
general reference in the main reading room. That was one of the best
general learning experiences that I have ever had. You learn so much
while fielding questions about everything.”

Avdoyan has published a number of opinion pieces on Armenian Studies
in the past, and today is troubled by a general shift in education
in the US. He says, “I feel we have in many ways lost our way.” He
would like to see greater support for and strengthening of existing
chairs and programs in the field, and is concerned about the poor
job market for the new doctorates being produced.

“I must say, however, that I spent many years bemoaning the fact that I
was not teaching in academia, until I realized what a truly rewarding
career I had at the Library of Congress. Not only was I allowed
to build an important research collection, but I have also been on
doctoral committees, in essence guided others in the preparation of
their dissertations, and have aided others in their research. With
a little creativity and initiative, and the enlightenment of our
community, I would hope that our gifted young scholars could do the
same rather than being forced to leave the field. It really has been
an honor to serve in this capacity.”

The fate of his own position at the Library of Congress is uncertain
after he retires, as it is unclear what the financial and logistic
situation will be then. He is not sure how long he will continue, as
there is no formal retirement age, but after the exhibition concludes,
Avdoyan plans to rest and think about new library projects and his
own future. He would like to get back to his personal Armenological
research eventually.

From: A. Papazian

"Municipal Authorities Must Submit"

“MUNICIPAL AUTHORITIES MUST SUBMIT”

08:59 pm | Today | Social

The mayor of Yerevan is the one responsible for the illegal stands
at Mashtots Park. The municipal authorities must be subject to the
people in Yerevan.

In relation to President Serzh Sargsyan’s visit to Mashtots Park
and his assignment to the mayor of Yerevan to demolish the stands,
the citizens of Armenia defending Mashtots Park declare:

The demolition of the illegal stands at Mashtots Park and the
elimination of the illegal acts are exclusively part of the powers
of Yerevan Municipality and the law-enforcement bodies according to
the RA Constitution,

For nearly 80 days, Yerevan Municipality and the mayor are inactive
in returning the public territory to the citizens of Yerevan and the
Republic of Armenia,

The mayor of Yerevan must submit to the will of the citizens of
Yerevan and not to the aesthetic preferences and positions of a person.

The evaluations of the police officers’ actions must be based on
the RA Constitution, the protection of public property, as well as
the protection of human rights and liberties. We have to condemn any
show of police brutality and illegal act, and not express gratitude
and consider that an achievement.

Serzh Sargsyan in no way touched upon the rights of RA citizens and
the protection of the people’s primary interests, which lie at the
core of the sovereignty of the Republic of Armenia and are the source
of the legitimacy of state officials (President, mayor and others).

Based on all this, we demand from the Yerevan Municipality to

-immediately annul the decisions on illegal construction at Mashtots
Park and return the park to the people by demolishing all the illegal
stands, -renovate the area, taking into account the opinion of the
public at large and participation in decision-making.

Find and bring to justice all the corresponding bodies of the Republic
of Armenia that made illegal decisions, restore the material damage
caused to the community and bring the officials who violated the RA
citizens’ legal interests and the police officers that applied force
against the people.

We will continue our civil and legitimate struggle to gain and exercise
our constitutional rights for the protection of our public property,
national pride and the primary interests of our people.

“We are the owners of this city” civil initiative “Our City”
civil-social initiative “In Defense of Teghut” civil initiative
“Trchkan” civil initiative Self-determined citizens at Mashtots Park

From: A. Papazian

http://www.a1plus.am/en/social/2012/05/01/purak