Harut Sassounian à Issy-les-Moulineaux à 18h

Conférence
Harut Sassounian à Issy-les-Moulineaux à 18h

Les arméniens demandent justice, pas seulement la reconnaissance du génocide

Éditeur et rédacteur en Chef du California Courrier, chroniqueur,
commentateur télé, analyste politique reconnu et militant des Droits
de l’Homme, Harut SASSOUNIAN donnera une conférence à
Issy-Les-moulineaux, samedi 24 janvier à 18h (1).

Spécialiste des relations géopolitiques au Moyen-Orient, il parle
couramment anglais, français, arabe, turc et arménien. Pendant dix
ans, de 1978 à 1988, il est délégué des Droits de l’Homme auprès des
Nations Unies.

Son rôle a été primordial dans la reconnaissance du Génocide arménien
par la Sous- Commission de Prévention des Discriminations et
Protections des Minorité des Nations Unies.

Profondément attaché à ses racines arméniennes, il a fondé et préside
une coalition de cinq importantes organisations caritatives
arméno-américaines, le Fonds Arménien Uni. Depuis le tremblement de
terre de 1988, plus de 700 millions de dollars d’aide humanitaire ont
été envoyé en Arménie.

En tant que Vice-Président de la Kirk Kerkorian’s Lincy Foundation, il
a également supervisé la construction d’infrastructures en Arménie, à
hauteur de 242 millions de dollars.

Conseiller auprès du Ministère arménien de la Diaspora, il aussi
membre du Conseil Consultatif du Comité National Arménien des
États-Unis. Grce à ses recherches, il a pu écrire de nombreux
ouvrages dont le livre >.

Ses actions pour promouvoir les Droits de l’Homme lui ont valu de
recevoir les plus hautes récompenses et reconnaissances de nombreux
pays et d’organisations internationales, parmi lesquelles la Médaille
d’Honneur d’Ellis Island pour les États-Unis ou encore la Médaille
d’Honneur Anania Shiragatsi par le Président de la République
d’Arménie.

(1) Hôtel de ville – Salle Multimédia : 62 rue du Général Leclerc –
Métro Mairie d’Issy

Photos : 24 avril 2010

samedi 24 janvier 2015,
Jean Eckian (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=107193

Russian Evangelical Bishop Grieves with Armenian Gyumri

Cross Map
Jan 24 2015

Russian Evangelical Bishop Grieves with Armenian Gyumri

By , Christian Telegraph On January 24, 2015

The head bishop of the Russian Church of Christians of Evangelical
Faith (RC of CEF), Edward Grabovenko expressed condolences to the
relatives of the Avetisyan family, killed in the Armenian city Gyumri,
reports The Christian Telegraph.

“On behalf of the Russian Church of Christians of Evangelical Faith,
we express sincere condolences to the relatives and friends of the
Avetisyan family, killed in Gyumri, as well as to the President of
Armenia and all Armenian people. The news about the terrible murder of
innocent people has caused grieve. Together with brotherly Armenian
people, we are upset about this tragedy, and hope that centuries-old
friendship with these people will stand this uneasy test,” said the
appeal, posted on the Church’s website.

“We pray for wisdom for everyone, who is responsible for the
investigation, and believe, that those responsible for the crime
against the peaceful family will be punished,” noted Edward
Grabovenko.

On January 12, 2015 six people were killed in Gyumri, Armenia. The
Armenian Investigative Committee named Valery Permyakov, a Russian
servicemen, who deserted the base, stationed at the Russian 102nd
Military Base in Gyumri, as a suspect. Among the victims were a
couple, their son and daughter-in-law, a 2-year-old granddaughter, an
unmarried daughter and infant, who died of wounds on January 19 in a
Yerevan hospital.

Mass protests took place both in Yerevan and Gyumri on January 15. The
protesters demanded to extradite Permyakov to Armenia and judge him
under the Armenian laws. At least 14 people were injured during the
clashes in Gyumri. Dozens of protesters tried to burn the Russian
flag.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.crossmap.com/news/russian-evangelical-bishop-grieves-with-armenian-gyumri-15880

Russian foreign minister’s annual address, news conference

Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Jan 22 2015

Russian foreign minister’s annual address, news conference

Excerpt of “Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov’s address and annual news
conference on Russia’s diplomatic performance in 2014, Moscow, 21
January 2015”

Address

Ladies and gentlemen,

Welcome to our annual meeting on Russia’s diplomatic performance.

[parts omitted]

Gyumri tragedy in Armenia

Question: The image of the Russian soldier has traditionally been
respected in Armenia. However, a tragedy occurred in the city in
Gyumri, where a Russian soldier killed an entire family. How was that
possible? Has Russia done all it could to resolve this conflict? Has
the issue been over-politicised?

Sergey Lavrov: First of all, I would like once again to express our
profound condolences over the horrible crime that has been committed
against the Avetisyan family. Completely innocent people have been
killed. Yesterday, six-month old Seryozha also died. I called my
Armenian counterpart Edvard Nalbandyan regarding this, and once again
expressed our feelings.

Importantly, the perpetrator has been arrested and has already
confessed to the crime. Our countries’ presidents have been in contact
by telephone. Alexander Bastrykin, the head of the Russian
Investigative Committee, went to Yerevan and yesterday met with
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan. We confirm that a joint, maximally
open judicial investigation and trial will take place in Armenia. I am
confident that the court will quickly deliver an objective verdict
that will be proportionate to this horrible crime.

As for the general context of our relations, I will say this: “There’s
a rotten apple in every barrel.” This is precisely the attitude that
is being shown today by all military servicemen and commanding
officers at the Russian military base in Armenia. I will not cite
examples of people going mad for totally incomprehensible reasons and
doing the unthinkable. There are plenty such examples in other
situations and in other countries.

We are seeing attempts to politicise this situation that are coming
not from the Armenian or Russian leadership. There is no shortage of
those willing to use this tragedy to obtain some geopolitical
advantages. This is disgusting, unacceptable and unworthy of the proud
Armenian people who, I am sure, will never fall for this kind of
provocation.

We are grieving together with Armenia and we will do all we can to
ensure that this crime does not go unpunished, that the perpetrator is
punished severely and that such things do not happen again. Naturally,
it is impossible to ensure a 100 per cent guarantee against any
inconceivable excesses, but everything that needs to be done will be
done. I am confident that Russian-Armenian relations of alliance and
strategic partnership will not be damaged.

[parts omitted]

Detained Russian citizen

Question: This question may not be on Russia’s agenda, but it remains
relevant for Azerbaijan. I’m talking about an ethnic Azerbaijani,
Dilgam Askerov, a Russian citizen, who was detained on Azerbaijan’s
occupied territory and is still held in an Armenian prison. Why has
Russia shown no interest in the fate of its citizen? Why has Russia
failed to make a single statement calling for Askerov’s release?

Sergey Lavrov: You mean that he is a Russian citizen who was detained
by Armenia? If so, we will discuss this issue with Armenia. A number
of Russian citizens are detained in various countries. We are
constantly monitoring what’s happening to them. Taking into account
that we need to receive information on the reasons that led to the
detention and based upon these data, our assessment of the gravity of
accusations against Russian citizens, as well as understanding the
conditions in which they are being held and the plans of the country
regarding Russian citizens it holds in detention, we take the
necessary decisions through channels that exist to this effect within
the framework of Russia’s bilateral relations with the relevant
country.

From: A. Papazian

Lieu d’entrée des Arméniens à Marseille, le J4 est hautement symboli

REVUE DE PRESSE
Lieu d’entrée des Arméniens à Marseille, le J4 est hautement symbolique

Pour la 7ème année, la Jeunesse arménienne de France organise Amnésie
internationale, ce week-end, deux jours de débats et de concerts. Si
la manifestation interroge “tous les génocides du 20e siècle”, en
cette année de centenaire, elle propose un zoom plus particulier sur
le génocide arménien. Fondateurs d’Amnésie internationale et
représentant de la JAF, Pascal Chamassian présente cette édition dont
Marsactu est partenaire.

LIRE LA SUITE…

samedi 24 janvier 2015,
Stéphane (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.marsactu.fr/culture/lieu-dentree-des-armeniens-a-marseille-le-j4-est-hautement-symbolique-37786.html
http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=107340

Remembering the Last Hero of Arara

Remembering the Last Hero of Arara

This is the translation of the eulogy by Alex Kalaydjian at the
funeral of the Battle of Arara hero Hampartsoum Nazrian who died in
Jerusalem in 1984. The Armenian version was published in “Õ. Ôµ. Õ?.”
Armenian quarterly, Number 1 to 4, 1984)’Editor.

Former Legionnaire Hampartsoum Nazrian was born in Hajn in 1889. The
youngest child, he lost his father when he was only six-years-old. In
1896’when he was seven–he witnessed the hanging of his older brother
Haygazoun during the Hamidian massacres of the mid-1890s. Other than
his innate nature, perhaps the slaying of his brother is the event
which made him resolve to avenge the injustice.

When he was a young boy difficult financial and political
circumstances forced him to seek a career rather than attend school.
Growing up, he became more immersed in political-revolutionary
pursuits, and as a young man joined the Social Democrat Hnchagian
Party. In adolescence and later as a member of the Hnchagian Party, he
became a secret messenger and revolutionary worker from Armenian
centres in Cilicia to various regions of the Arab world. As a result,
he established strong friendships with Arab political activists and
leaders.

As is well known, immediately prior to the WWI, the Arab world had
risen against the Ottoman regime and demanded independence. In 1916
the Allies had made many promises to the Arab leaders so that the
latter would rise against Ottoman Turkey. Among the more famous of the
Arab rebel leaders was Sharif Hussein (the great-grandfather of King
Hussein of Jordan) and his son Prince Faisal, the future king of Iraq.
Because of his advanced age, Sharif Hussein had appointed Prince
Faisal as leader of the Arab revolutionary-military movement.

Just prior to the start of the war, Prince Faisal, having known of Mr.
Nazrian’s reputation and his loyalty, invited Mr. Nazrian to join his
bodyguards, along with six other Armenians. Nazrian accepted the
invitation and for the next three years, along with his six comrades,
participated in the Arab liberation struggle, from Mecca-Medina to
Iraq.

In 1917, when they heard of the French government’s plan to form an
Armenian Legion, alongside its Foreign Legion, Nazrian and his armed
companions were among the first to volunteer. Prince Faisal, who by
then had achieved his goal [driving the Ottoman Turks from Arab lands]
allowed his Armenian bodyguards to resign and join the struggle on
behalf of the Armenian people.

By coincidence, the Armenian Legion was ordered to concentrate and
hold positions across from the Arara hills (northern Palestine), where
a Turkish-German united army had established a most important defile.
>From their positions, for eight months, they had managed to halt the
advance of the Allied forces to the south and the east. The head of
the Allied forces was General Allenby while French Commander Jolie had
assumed immediate charge of the Armenian brigade. The months of
inactivity had made the Armenian fighters impatient for action.
Finally, a special delegation, including Nazrian, following long and
arduous negotiations, persuaded a reluctant Jolie to allow them to
attack the enemy positions, according to a plan designed by the
Armenians.

The Armenians, made up of around 200 fighters, went on the attack on
Sept. 10 of 1918. Nazrian and 40 others rushed the enemy’s military
headquarters and surprised its leadership and fighters. The foe, whose
soldiers numbered six to eight times the number of Armenians,
surrendered to a handful of Armenian fighters. Twenty-one Armenians
legionnaires lost their lives in the battle that day. The victory
opened the way to the Allies to advance south, east, towards Jerusalem
and Port Said.

Upon the declaration of Armistice, General Allenby proudly talked of
the bravery of the Armenian fighters. At the end of the war, the
Armenian Legion, including Nazrian, moved to Cilicia upon the promises
of the Allies according to which the Armenians would be granted
freedom.

Nazrian and his friends continued their volunteer work in Adana’s
Yenni Mahalle neighborhood until 1921 when the deportations and the
massacres of Armenians resumed. Together with his mother, older sister
and niece Nazrian hit the road to the Arabian desert’the road which he
had traveled during more hopeful and optimistic circumstances.

Months later the Nazrians settled in Jerusalem. The former warrior
married in the Holy City and had six children. A few years after
settling in Jerusalem, while roaming through the villages around the
city, he discovered that Arara wasn’t too far. After some difficulty,
but with the support and blessing of Patriarch Yeghishe Turian,
Nazrian succeeded in exhuming the 21 Armenian warriors and
transferring their bones from the obscure Arara village to the Saint
Savior National Cemetery, just outside the Armenian Quarter in
Jerusalem.

Years later he would tell that the happiest day in his life was the
day he helped bring his comrades’ relics to Jerusalem and to witness
their burial with prayer, Holy Mass, and incense of Armenian clergy.

>From that day on for the next 59 years the Genocide Day was the
holiest day of the calendar for Nazrian. Every year, on April 24, he
led the national procession, medals on his chest, with a laurel and
group photograph of his comrades in his hands. He maintained the
tradition until he was 95–the last year of his life.

In 1933 the French ambassador, in the name of the French government,
pinned the Croix de Guerre medal on the chest of Nazrian. The ceremony
was attended by religious and government leaders.

In his eulogy of Nazrian Alex Kalaydjian said: ` You are one of the
last ones, who through beautiful coincidence, come to rest next to
your martyred comrades-in-arm, who on a beautiful day, fell on foreign
soil, giving their lives for freedom, justice, and human rights, which
were exiled from this region for centuries.

`This is how Arara’soaked with Armenian blood–speaks to us,’ added
Kalaydjian: `I am a symbol of the vigor of the 20th century Armenian,
his bravery, self-sacrifice, selflessness, martyrdom and patriotism.
There were before me and there will be after me other mountains and
hills, fields and valleys, not to mourn for the tribulations of the
Armenians, but to sing for their unexcelled bravery and heroism. I am
a stranger to you and will remain stranger to you. My slopes are
painted with the blood of many other nations, but I was called to life
only when you blessed me with your blood: with pure Armenian blood.
You made me eternal and immortal. On my slopes, with their death, 21
heroes left an inheritance’to maintain the pure Armenian soul, to
nurse over traditional Armenian sanctities and to protect with my life
everything that belong to the Armenian as a right’character, vigor,
manhood, religion, language and fatherland. This is the Arara soul,
which doesn’t recognize defeat, and which is immortal.’

For 68 years Hampartsoum Nazrian lived in Jerusalem as an ideal
Armenian, always holding high his nation’s integrity, the success of
his fatherland, and the unity of the Armenian Nation. That’s how he
lived. And just an hour before his death, Nazrian asked me to extend
that same message to you.

`May God rest your tired bones and may the earth be light on you.’

From: A. Papazian

http://www.keghart.com/Kalaydjian-Nazrian-Arara

Times: As you reflect on Nazi horrors, remember an earlier holocaust

The Sunday Times (London), UK
January 25, 2015 Sunday

As you reflect on Nazi horrors, remember an earlier holocaust

by DOMINIC LAWSON

Among the evidence brought by prosecutors at the Nuremberg war crimes
tribunal was an account of a speech Adolf Hitler gave in Obersalzburg
to his generals on the eve of the invasion of Poland, to steel them
for the atrocities to come. In it the Nazi leader put the rhetorical
question: “Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the
Armenians?”

If the intention was to suggest that the slaughter of millions of
Polish Jews and other “inferior races” would be forgotten by history,
the Führer has been proved wrong. What became known as the Holocaust
is now seen as one of the defining events of the 20th century. On
Tuesday we will be reflecting on it with particular intensity, as it
marks the 70th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz
concentration camp in Nazioccupied Poland, where an estimated 1m Jews
were exterminated: January 27 is commemorated as Holocaust Memorial
Day.

Yet while the continental scale and industrialised efficiency of the
Nazis’ genocidal campaign against the Jews was unique, there was, as
Hitler implied, an antecedent: and this year marks its 100th
anniversary. As the website of Britain’s Holocaust Memorial Day Trust
points out: “The term ‘genocide’ was first used in 1933, in a paper
presented to the League of Nations by the Polish lawyer Raphael
Lemkin. He devised the concept in response to the atrocities
perpetrated against the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire
between 1915 and 1918.” The website goes on to explain: “It is unknown
how many Armenians were murdered in this period but estimates range
from 1.3m to 1.9m.”

That would suggest roughly threequarters of the Armenian race were
wiped out – a greater proportion than even Hitler managed in respect
of Europe’s Jewish population. Yet this is a remarkably littleknown
fact. There is a curious inverse relation between this genocide and
that of the Jewish people. The latter was downplayed by the British
and American governments while it was taking place, largely because
President Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill were concerned not
to give the public the faintest reason to believe Hitler’s claim that
the war was being fought “for the Jews”. It was only with the
televised trial of Adolf Eichmann in 1961 that the scale and true
nature of the Holocaust impinged on public consciousness in Britain
and America.

The opposite process happened with the genocide of the Armenian
people. The shocked US consul in Aleppo in 1915-16 reported in
dispatches “a gigantic plundering scheme and a final blow to
extinguish the Armenian race”. Churchill in his 1929 book The World
Crisis wrote: “In 1915 the Turkish government began and ruthlessly
carried out the infamous general massacre and deportations of
Armenians in Asia Minor … whole districts were blotted out in one
administrative holocaust … there is no reasonable doubt that this
crime was planned and executed for political reasons.”

But nowadays the British and American governments refuse to attach the
word “genocide”, let alone “holocaust”, to what happened to the
Armenians. This is pure realpolitik. Modern-day Armenia – which
represents about 10% of the landmass of its historic territory – is a
poor landlocked country of no great strategic significance. Turkey, by
contrast, is a vast country, a Nato member of tremendous geostrategic
importance – and its government has long been intensely neuralgic on
the Armenian issue.

As the eminent lawyer Geoffrey Robertson pointed out in his recent
book An Inconvenient Genocide, while the British government
disingenuously states that it has asked Turkey to work with the
Armenians “to address their common history”, “this is not possible as
long as Turkey maintains its obsessive denialism and uses Article 301
of its Penal Code to threaten those of its citizens who ‘insult
Turkishness’ by referring to the treatment of Armenians in 1915 as
genocide.” Even its great novelists, such as Orhan Pamuk and Elif
Shafak, have faced prosecution under Article 301, the latter when some
of her fictional characters spoke about the genocide.

It is not as if the current government of Turkey needs to defend the
reputation of the ultra-nationalist regime that controlled the Ottoman
Empire in 1915-18, any more than the current German government would
feel the need to justify what the Nazis did during the Second World
War. Yet it does: last November the director-general for policy
planning at the Turkish foreign ministry, Altay Cengizer, said his
government was bracing itself for the 100th anniversary of “the
events” of 1915 and that “Turkey does not deserve to appear before the
world as a nation that committed genocide … these claims target our
very identity”.

It seems to be lost on such people – though not on the many wonderful
Turks I have met who despair of their government – that one reason
Germany has such a high standing in international opinion is that it
is open and contrite about the crimes of an earlier era.

Obviously such matters are difficult to talk about, once you get down
to grisly details beyond mere numbers. In essence: because they saw
the presence of the minority Christian Armenians in Anatolia as a
potential threat to the disintegrating Ottoman Empire, the government
known as the Young Turks implemented a plan – to quote that brave
Turkish commentator Cengiz Aktar – “to engineer a homogeneous
population composed of Muslims designated to form the backbone of the
yet-to-be-invented Turkish nation. Thus there was no place for
Christian populations.”

>From April 24, 1915, the Armenian population saw their menfolk
murdered en masse and women and children sent on what amounted to
death marches (or “relocation”) into the Syrian desert. The language
used in justification was a foul foreshadowing of that later employed
by the Nazis against the Jews. Thus Dr Mehmed Resid, the governor of
Diyarbakir province: “The Armenian bandits were a load of harmful
microbes that had afflicted the body of the fatherland. Was it not the
duty of the doctor to kill the microbes?”

Another parallel is that the Armenians, like the Jews of Europe,
tended to be successful traders, wealthier than the general
population. There was similar profit to be made by their expropriation
and removal, with the Ottoman Treasury the principal beneficiary.

While the bacillus of anti-semitism continues to infect men’s minds,
the attempted annihilation of the Armenians – the first nation to
become Christian, long before the Roman Empire – also has its modern
version; though in this case the incubator is a form of religious
rather than racial ideology.

Across swathes of the Middle East Christians are suffering
persecution. In Syria and Iraq the forces of Isis offer them the deal
the Turks made to some of the (more fortunate) Armenian women and
children a century ago: you will be spared, but only if you convert to
Islam. And in a cruel echo of what happened to thousands of Armenian
churches during the massacres, Isis has destroyed the Armenian
Genocide Memorial Church and Museum in the Syrian town of Deir ez-Zor.

Much though some people wish to eradicate or deny the evidence for
what happened to the Armenians a century ago, this year – of all years
– it should be commemorated. But don’t expect Washington or
Westminster to make the effort.

[email protected]

FROM APRIL 24, 1915, THE ARMENIANS SAW THEIR MENFOLK MURDERED EN MASSE

From: A. Papazian

http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/comment/columns/dominiclawson/article1510903.ece

La tragedia degli armeniLo sterminio silenziosodi cui si tace troppo

Il Giorno (Italy)
23 gennaio 2015 venerdì

La tragedia degli armeniLo sterminio silenziosodi cui si tace troppo spesso

La storia della piccola e assimilata comunità italiana

VETRINA; Pag. 16

CENTO ANNI fa, un milione e mezzo di armeni morivano uccisi dalle
milizie dei Giovani Turchi ottomani saliti al potere agli inizi del
Novecento. Accadeva in quella che oggi è la Turchia: uomini, donne,
bambini e anziani massacrati nelle loro case, costretti a marciare
fino alla morte nel deserto dell’Anatolia centrale, deportati e
lasciati morire di stenti. Accadeva a due passi dall’Europa, nel
silenzio della comunità internazionale. QUELLO DEGLI ARMENI è stato il
primo Genocidio del Novecento, inteso come sterminio sistematico
rivolto contro un’intera etnia, al punto che il termine è stato
coniato proprio per dare un nome ai crimini orrendi commessi in nome
del nazionalismo turco, il cui solo obiettivo era l’eliminazione
fisica sistematica delle minoranze.

Quella armena, in particolare, per la sua presenza storica e
numericamente importante in tutta la regione dell’Anatolia, ex Impero
Ottomano, fu la prima a pagare il prezzo del fanatismo. NELL’IMMINENZA
del Giorno della Memoria del 27 gennaio, quando ci si interroga su
come la Shoah abbia potuto consumarsi nel cuore dell’Europa civile di
quegli anni, può essere utile ricordare la frase attribuita ad Adolf
Hitler nel 1939 e rivolta ad alcuni diplomatici britannici in servizio
a Berlino: Chi parla ancora oggi dell’annientamento degli armeni? (Wer
redet noch heute von der Vernichtung der Armenier?). Erano passati
solo vent’anni e quello che sarebbe successo da lì a poco è cosa
tristemente nota. Ecco perché è importante la memoria. Nessuno può
dire oggi come sarebbe andata se la Comunità internazionale fosse
intervenuta mentre si consumava il genocidio del popolo armeno con il
suo milione e mezzo di morti. Certamente il fondamentalismo si nutre
dell’indifferenza e, purtroppo, anche dell’ipocrisia di chi si volta
dall’altra parte, per ignoranza o per ragioni di opportunismo politico
o economico. Certo, non tutti si voltarono dall’altra parte. Anche gli
armeni ebbero i loro giusti, persone che seppero opporsi a quanto
stava accadendo al prezzo della vita. UN NOME su tutti, che ci lega in
modo significativo al dramma della Shoah, è quello di Armin Wegner,
ufficiale tedesco di stanza in Turchia durante la Prima Guerra
Mondiale che documentò il genocidio denunciandone gli orrori
nonostante la censura esercitata dal governo e dalle autorità turche.
Tornato in Germania, si oppose alle politiche anti-semite naziste. Mi
auguro che il Giorno della Memoria sia un momento non retorico per
rendere omaggio alle vittime della persecuzione ma anche a chi quella
persecuzione denunciò con coraggio. Sono passati cento anni dai
drammatici eventi che diedero inizio alla diaspora del nostro popolo.
Il 24 aprile, e per tutto il 2015, ricorderemo i nostri morti, ma
soprattutto cercheremo di esercitare la memoria nel senso più alto,
diffondendo la cultura armena per come essa ha saputo esprimersi in
Italia e nel mondo con i suoi tanti figli allontananti dalla terra
d’origine. LO SFORZO per un’integrazione armoniosa nelle società
ospitanti è stata una carta vincente per gli armeni, e ha garantito
loro la loro sopravvivenza. Bisogna valutare e valorizzare, come un
buon esempio, le dinamiche con cui una minoranza di stranieri ha
interagito in modo positivo con la società ospite senza perdere le
proprie originalità costitutive. A poche settimane dall’attacco al
settimanale Charlie Hebdo a Parigi, mi piace ricordare che la Francia
è stata tra i primi Paesi ad aprire le porte alla diaspora armena,
tanto da contare oggi una comunità di oltre 800mila persone. Per
quanto sta accadendo, con pericolosi eccessi di fondamentalismo vicini
e lontani e nell’imminenza del centenario, uno sforzo per il
riconoscimento del genocidio da parte della Comunità internazionale e
dell’Europa, appare ormai irrinunciabile. *Presidente Unioni Armeni
d’Italia

From: A. Papazian

L’ex-président Gül conseille plus de démocratie à son successeur Erd

TURQUIE
L’ex-président Gül conseille plus de démocratie à son successeur Erdogan

L’ancien président turc Abdullah Gül est sorti de son silence pour
recommander la mise en oeuvre de réformes démocratiques dans son pays,
signalant à nouveau sa différence avec son successeur Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, a rapporté la presse vendredi. “Nous sommes confrontés à
d’énormes menaces, de nombreuses menaces qui visent la Turquie. La
seule façon d’y répondre est d’approfondir notre démocratie”, a
déclaré à d’anciens députés M. Gül, cité par le quotidien Hürriyet.

“Nous suivons le chemin de la démocratie depuis longtemps, la plupart
des restrictions ont été levées (…) mais nous devons encore un peu
relever le niveau”, a–il poursuivi, citant “le respect des droits de
l’Homme et l’Etat de droit”. Cofondateur avec M. Erdogan du Parti de
la justice et du développement (AKP, islamo-conservateur) qui dirige
la Turquie depuis 2002, M. Gül a quitté la présidence en août après
l’élection de son compagnon de route dès le premier tour.

Ces dernières années, l’ex-chef de l’Etat a souvent pris publiquement
ses distances avec M. Erdogan, alors Premier ministre, notamment lors
la violente répression de la contestation de juin 2013 ou du blocage
des réseaux sociaux Twitter et YouTube début 2014. M. Gül est resté
discret depuis la fin de son mandat mais il a signalé son intention de
continuer à peser sur la vie de l’AKP, au point que certains
commentateurs en ont fait un possible rival modéré de l’intransigeant
M. Erdogan.

Ses commentaires interviennent alors que quelques dizaines de députés
du parti au pouvoir ont refusé mercredi de voter l’absolution de
quatre ex-ministres accusés de corruption, laissant entrevoir des
failles inédites au sein de l’AKP. “Avoir la majorité ne signifie pas
forcément la stabilité politique”, a commenté l’ex-président, qui
s’est également prononcé contre un changement de régime.

Décidé à garder les rênes du pays, M. Erdogan a rompu avec le rôle
très protocolaire tenu par son prédécesseur pour s’imposer en
président chef de l’exécutif. Il souhaite changer la Constitution en
cas de large victoire de son parti aux législatives de juin prochain.

Istanbul, 23 jan 2015 (AFP) –

samedi 24 janvier 2015,
Ara (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

Armenia’s involvement in Eurasian Economic Union does not look too p

Armenia’s involvement in Eurasian Economic Union does not look too promising

by Arthur Yernjakyan
ARMINFO
Saturday, January 24, 15:28

Armenia’s involvement in the Eurasian Economic Union does not look too
promising as it will curb foreign investments, MP Armen Martirosyan
told journalists on Saturday.

He said that the crisis in Russia will cause a crisis in Armenia.
“With current oil prices, Russia’s stabilization fund will shortly
end. The Eurasian Economic Union will hardly help Armenia to develop.
It is not an efficient structure and will hardly be considering the
plans of Kazakhstan and Belarus to more actively trade with Asia and
the West,” Martirosyan said.

MP Artsvik Minasyan said that Armenia’s economy would decline no
matter if it joined the EEU or not as it is closely related to the
Russian economy. “Our problem is that we have no institutions
protecting foreign investments and human rights and this is the key
factor that deters foreign investments,” Minasyan said.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Soldiers Killed In Border Clash With Azerbaijan

ARMENIAN SOLDIERS KILLED IN BORDER CLASH WITH AZERBAIJAN

Reuters
Jan 23 2015

YEREVAN Fri Jan 23, 2015 9:21pm IST

Jan 23 (Reuters) – At least two Armenian soldiers were killed in
clashes with troops from neighbouring Azerbaijan on Friday, but the
former Soviet republics gave conflicting death tolls and disputed
who was to blame.

Sporadic clashes between the two countries have thwarted international
efforts to end a territorial dispute that broke out in the dying
years of the Soviet Union and has killed about 30,000 people.

Armenia’s Defence Ministry accused the Azeri side of killing two of
its soldiers. “All responsibility for escalation of the situation and
its consequences lies with the political and military leadership of
Azerbaijan,” it said in a statement.

Azerbaijan’s Defence Ministry, meanwhile, accused Armenian soldiers
of trying to cross the border and said 12 of them had been killed
and 20 wounded. It said the Armenians were the first to open fire,
and there were no Azeri casualties.

Skirmishes around the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh and along
the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan underline the risk of
broader conflict in the South Caucasus, a region criss-crossed by
oil and gas pipelines.

Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous region within Azerbaijan, is controlled
by ethnic Armenians who form the majority of its population. The
enclave’s defence ministry said three Azeri soldiers were killed in
skirmishes with ethnic Armenian separatists on Thursday night.

According to reports in Armenia, two Armenian soldiers were killed
and one was wounded in similar clashes earlier this week.

Armenian-backed forces seized Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding
Azeri districts in the early 1990s. Efforts to reach a permanent
settlement have failed, despite mediation led by France, Russia and
the United States.

Oil-producing Azerbaijan, host to global majors including BP , Chevron
and ExxonMobil, frequently threatens to take the mountain region back
by force, and is spending heavily on its armed forces.

Armenia, an ally of Russia, says it would not stand by if
Nagorno-Karabakh were attacked. (Reporting by Hasmik Lazarian in
Yerevan and Nailia Bagirova in Baku; Writing by Margarita Antidze;
Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

From: A. Papazian

http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/01/23/armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-idINL6N0V225A20150123