Over 50 foreign jewelry companies ready to open businesses in Armeni

Over 50 foreign jewelry companies ready to open businesses in Armenia

YEREVAN, April 8, / ARKA /. More than 50 foreign jewelry companies
are ready to open businesses in Armenia, according to Gagik Gevorkian,
president of the Armenian Jewelers Association (AJA) and chairman of
the Association of Russian Jewelers Guild.

He said the AJA is currently implementing a program, which calls for
creation of around 1,500 new jobs in its first stage by bringing
foreign jewelry companies, particularly from Russia, USA, France,
Italy and Thailand, to Armenia. “In the long-term we plan to create up
to 3,000 jobs” he said.

He refused to specify how much these foreign companies may invest in
Armenia’s jewelry industry, saying only they will export their entire
output and will not compete with the local market.

According to him, the main obstacle to the implementation of this
program is the lack of suitable space in Yerevan.

“The main purpose of this program is to make Armenia a center of world
jewelry. We need an area of 20 thousand square meters, «he said,
adding that the talks on lease of area have been going on for more
than a year, but with no outcome yet.

On his part, a deputy economy minister Tigran Harutyunyan noted that
the government is assisting this program to materialize by organizing
talks between AJA and companies which could lease their space. He
said the government is not responsible for their outcome.

According to the ministry of economy, production of jewelry in 2012
in Armenia totaled 13.3 billion drams, an increase of 16 percent
compared to 2011. -0-

From: A. Papazian

Georgian brandy sale in Russia not to affect Armenian brandy realiza

Georgian brandy sale in Russia not to affect Armenian brandy realization

16:54 – 08.04.13

The Georgian brandy’s entrance to the Russian market is not expected
to impact the Armenian product’s realization, says the director of the
Yerevan Brandy Company.

According to him, the impact will be almost equal to zero. `As far as
brandy is concerned, I don’t think it the number is so hight to make
us think and draw conclusions. The embargo effect leaves our plans
unaffected,’ Ara Grigoryan told a news conference on Monday.

But the wine market is likely to face certain problems, the Company’s
director added. `The Russian market would realize 34-35 liters of wine
before the embargo took effect. I don’t think now that they will
resume the same volume, but that’s a problem for us, nonetheless
because we did not have firm positions on the Russian market,’
Grigoryan added.

Armenian News – Tert.am

From: A. Papazian

Andranik Mihranyan: Russia is Armenia’s only strategic partner

Andranik Mihranyan: Russia is Armenia’s only strategic partner
18:53 08.04.2013

Anna Nazaryan
`Radiolur’

`It would be incorrect to say that Russia is Armenia’s only ally in
the region, but Russia is the only strategic partner of Armenia,’
Director of the New York based Institute for Democracy and
Cooperation, political scientist Andranik Mihranyan told reporters
today. According to him, Armenia is trying to cooperate with both
Russia and the United States, not contradict the two.

Asked which direction Armenia will chose – the Customs Union or the
European direction – Andranik Mihranyan said `Armenia should conduct a
flexible policy’ and voiced hope that the country will find a formula
to maintain close ties with the European Union and not spoil the
relations with Russia.

As for the Karabakh conflict, the political scientist said its
settlement is possible only when the superpowers reach an agreement.

Speaking about the Armenian-Turkish relations, Andranik Mihranyan
reminded that he was one member of the reconciliation committee and
contacts between Armenians and Turks seemed ridiculous at the time.
`However, today’s situation shows that the picture has changed,’ he
said.

Touching upon the recent presidential elections in Armenia, the
political scientist said `it was the first presidential election to
receive a positive assessment by all countries.’

Andranik Mihranyan said he respects Raffi Hovhannisyan, but added that
he’s a public figure rather than a politician.

From: A. Papazian

`Armenpress’ referred to the only visit of `Iron Lady’ to Armenia

`Armenpress’ referred to the only visit of `Iron Lady’ to Armenia.
photos tell the history

17:59, 8 April, 2013

YEREVAN, APRIL 8, ARMENPRESS: The only female Prime Minister of Great
Britain Margaret Thatcher in June 1990 paid her first and only visit
to Leninakan (Gyumri), Armenia in frames of her visit to the Soviet
Union. The coverage of the visit of the `Iron Lady’ to Leninakan was
assured by `Armenpress’ agency with a number of photos showing the
details of `Iron Lady’s’ visit.

In Gyumri airport British Prime Minister was received by First
Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Armenia
Vladimir Movsisyan, Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the
Armenian SSR V. S. Margaryants and Foreign Minister of Armenian SSR
A.A. Lazarian.

`Children gifted flowers to the respected guest; girls in traditional
Armenian dresses treated her with salt and bread. Afterwards Margaret
Thatcher, leadership and high rank officials of Armenia SSR got into
the cars,’ Armenpress wrote in 1990.

Thatcher participated in the opening ceremony of Byron School in
Gyumri, which was built and gifted by British side after 1988
earthquake.

Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a towering figure in
postwar British and world politics and the only woman to become
British prime minister, died at the age of 87 on April 7. Thatcher’s
funeral will be at St. Paul’s Cathedral, with full military honors,
followed by a private cremation.

Thatcher served from 1975 to 1990 as leader of the Conservative Party.
She was called the “Iron Lady” for her personal and political
toughness. She retired from public life after a stroke in 2002 and
suffered several strokes after that.

She made few public appearances in her final months, missing a
reception marking her 85th birthday hosted by Prime Minister David
Cameron in October 2010. She also skipped the July 2011 unveiling of a
statue honoring her old friend Ronald Reagan in London.

From: A. Papazian

Members of Parliament Raised Carrefour Issue

Members of Parliament Raised Carrefour Issue

In answer to Member of Parliament Samvel Farmanyan’s query Artak
Shaboyan, head of the State Commission for Protection of Economic
Competition, said he has learned about hindrances to the French
retailer Carrefour from the press. He noted that the issue has been
discussed thoroughly, and he has stated during several press
conferences that the representatives of Carrefour are welcome to come
up to the Commission if there are any problems. He notes that he has
received no requests from them.

Artak Shaboyan’s answer angered Member of Parliament Nikol Pashinyan.
`What do you mean we held a press conference, let them come and we’ll
discuss? Why didn’t you contact Carrefour when the diplomats
accredited in Armenia raised this issue? Aren’t you taking care about
competition? You think you are to hold press conferences and invite
those who have problems to come up to you?’ he said.

`I have to repeat that we tried to invite the representatives of
Carrefour for a discussion through all the mass media to figure out
their problem, conduct an objective survey. Substantial facts are
needed, abstract statements are not sufficient for a body that makes
administrative decisions. Carrefour is a company that would feel free
to come and present their problems. If there were problems, they
should have voiced them. We are ready to hold public discussions,’ he
said.

Nikol Pashinyan said the impression is that either the members of
government do not listen to the questions or they use ready texts to
utter. `Why haven’t you written to Carrefour, posted on their
Facebook, twitted your invitation?’ he repeated his question. Artak
Shaboyan assured that they have contacted with Carrefour in all the
possible ways.

16:49 08/04/2013
Story from Lragir.am News:

From: A. Papazian

http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/economy/view/29545

BAKU: Reasons for unresolved NK conflict discussed in Washington

Trend, Azerbaijan
April 7 2013

Reasons for unresolved Nagorno-Karabakh conflict discussed in Washington

Azerbaijan, Baku, April 6 / Trend E. Mehtiev /

One of the leading research centers in Washington, the Jamestown
Foundation has organized an event entitled ‘The United Nations and the
Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict: Back to the Basics’ dedicated to the 20th
anniversary of the adoption of the UN Security Council’s first
resolution on the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Among those delivering speeches at the event were Azerbaijan’s Deputy
Permanent Representative to the United Nations Tofig Musayev and
Senior Research Fellow of the Heritage Foundation Ariel Cohen,
Azerbaijani Embassy in the United States told Trend.

Chairman of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Frederick Starr was
the commentator of the event.

In his speech on ‘International Legal Relevance and Significance of
the UN Security Council Resolution’, Tofig Musayev told about the
necessity to follow the rules and principles of international law from
the point of protecting the security and peace.

One of the main factors preventing the solution of the conflict is
Armenia’s failure to implement the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions demanding the withdrawal of Armenian armed forces from the
territory of Azerbaijan. Armenia’s unconstructive position has no
basis under international law, Musayev said.

Analyzing the conflict in the context of regional realities and
positions of the international forces, Ariel Cohen said the U.S., as
the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair, has to put more efforts to resolve the
conflict.

In turn, Frederick Starr said peace in the South Caucasus region
depends on the cooperation of the three countries of the South
Caucasus.

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20 per cent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group – Russia, France and the U.S. – are
currently holding peace negotiations.
Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

From: A. Papazian

Andrzej Kasprzyk: Reports on the great number of ceasefire violation

Andrzej Kasprzyk: Reports on the great number of ceasefire violations
affect the mood of the society
13:58 06.04.2013

Lusine Avanesyan
“Radiolur”
Stepanakert

Personal Representatives of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Andrzej
Kasprzyk considers that Defense íinistry reports on the great number
of ceasefire violations affect the mood of the society.

“We have no influence on the statements of the Ministry of Defense,
but the reports on the great number of ceasefire violations affect the
mood of the public,” Kasprzyk said in an interview with Radiolur.

“I follow the reports, but I have no opportunity to check the
information,” he said, adding that it’s necessary to have observers to
confirm or refute the information about the exchange of fire all along
the line of contact.

“All I can do it to rely upon official information,” Kasprzyk said.

According to the Personal Representative of the OSCE
Chairman-in-Office, the creation of mechanisms of investigation of
border incidents is still on the agenda. “The issue is being discussed
and we hope to reach an agreement.

According to Ambassador Kasprzyk, the situation at the line of contact
is in the spotlight of all those engaged in the settlement of the
issue.

“One of the tasks of the OSCE Minsk Group is to help exclude the
ceasefire violations. The Co-Chairs’ crossing of the line of contact
on foot two times falls into this framework,” he said.

“They crossed the line of contact to familiarize with the situation on
the spot and calm down the situation at the frontline. This is the
first time they cross the line of contact two times in a week,” he
said, adding that “it’s difficult to conduct negotiations when there
is unrest at the frontline.”

From: A. Papazian

German-Armenians condemn post-election tensions in Armenia

German-Armenians condemn post-election tensions in Armenia

20:56 – 06.04.13

Armenian organizations in Germany have expressed concerns over the
political tensions observed in Armenia following the February
presidential election.

In a statement, they are calling upon the Armenian authorities to
refrain from excessive measures while resolving conflicts and avoid
developments that led to the March 1, 2008 post-election turmoil,
which claimed ten lives, living scores of people injured.

`The political situation in Armenia is extremely tense following the
February 18 presidential election. Despite certain forecasts, the
atmosphere is gradually growing more heated and is expected to reach
its culmination on April 9, the presidential inauguration day.

`It is PREDICTABLE that the civilian population will come into clashes
with the law enforcement bodies, with the developments likely to
follow the March 1 scenario.

`We express solidarity to the people’s fair struggle and STATE with
strong concerns that the use of any violent force or incitement will
have an unprecedented negative impact on the Armenian authorities and
the relations with the Diaspora.

`To the benefit of the Armenian nation and the country’s peaceful and
sustainable development, we call upon the incumbent authorities in
Armenia to adopt only a legal, pro-national and humanistic approach,
which will lay solid foundations for the on-going development of the
Armenia-Diaspora relations and further increase the Republic of
Armenia’s reputation on the international arena,’ reads the statement.

The document has been signed by the Armenian Congress of Europe
(German branch), Central Council of German-Armenians, German-Armenian
Cultural Association, the Armenian Community of Berlin, the Armenian
Cultural Union of Stuttgart, Third Millennium without Wars Union (NGO)
and the Armenian Renaissance organization’s German branch.

Armenian News – Tert.am

From: A. Papazian

Holocaust Memorial Center Hosts Armenian Genocide Speaker April 10

Patch.com
April 6 2013

Holocaust Memorial Center Hosts Armenian Genocide Speaker April 10

Dr. Robert Melson will speak on the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust.

The Holocaust Memorial Center Zekelman Family Campus announced Dr.
Robert Melson as the featured speaker for a presentation on the
Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust at 7 p.m. on April 10.

Titled, `Two Survivors’ Perspectives: The Armenian Genocide and the
Holocaust,’ Melson explores perpetrators’ means and motives, as well
as survivors’ courage and survival during the Armenian Genocide and
the Holocaust, focusing on the stories of Armenian Bishop Grigoris
Balakian and the Jewish Mendelsohn family.

Melson is Professor Emeritus at Purdue University and past president
of the International Association ofGenocide Scholars. His
publications include `Revolution and Genocide: On the Orgins of the
Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust.’ He also has lectured on ethnic
conflict and genocide at venues around the world.

This annual genocide commemoration is presented in cooperation with
the Voice/Vision Holocaust Survivor Oral History Archive, Cohn-Haddow
Center for Judaic Studies, and the Armenian Research Center at the
University of Michigan – Dearborn. Learn more at

Source: Holocaust Memorial Center press release

From: A. Papazian

http://farmington-mi.patch.com/articles/holocaust-memorial-center-hosts-armenian-genocide-speaker-april-10
www.holocaustcenter.org.

The Art of Turning Neighbors into Enemies

Asharq Alawsat (The Middle East)
April 5, 2013 Friday

The Art of Turning Neighbors into Enemies

By all accounts Azerbaijan should be Iran’s closest ally.

The tiny republic on the Caspian Sea is home to nine million people
with strong ethnic, historic, and religious ties to the Iranian
people. Almost 80 percent speak Azeri, an Altaic language with a
vocabulary drawn from Turkish, Persian, and Arabic. Around 12 million
people in five Iranian provinces speak a version of the language.

Azerbaijan also contains Kurdish, Gushtasbi-Talysh, Tat, and Lezgin
minorities; ethnic groups with kith and kin in Iran (ethnic and
linguistic minorities account for 22 percent of Azerbaijan’s
population).

Known as Aran, Shiravan and Nakhjivan, the areas that actually form
Azerbaijan were part of the Iranian heartland for more than 25
centuries. Iran lost them in two disastrous wars with Tsarist Russia
which was pursuing its dream of reaching warm waters through Iran.
With treaties imposed on the Qajar Shahs in 1824 and 1830 Iran ceded
the areas to the Tsars.

When the Tsarist Empire collapsed following the 1917-1918 Russian
Revolution, these areas came together to form an independent state.
The experiment lasted two years before Lenin sent an army of to
reassert Russian domination. Next, Josef Stalin, acting as Commissar
for Nationalities, transformed the territories into a new unit named
Azerbaijan, establishing it as an autonomous republic within the USSR.
The fall of the Soviet Empire in 1991 gave the people of Azerbaijan a
chance to regain their independence.

Due to these events, large numbers fled from the affected territories,
seeking refuge in Iran. Today there are millions of Iranians whose
ancestors fled the Tsarists and the Bolsheviks. The flow of refugees
to Iran from Azerbaijan continued for decades, albeit with varying
intensity. In the 1990s as Armenia invaded and annexed
Nagorno-Karabakh, half a million people fled from Azerbaijan to Iran.

With Shi’ite Muslims representing some 85 percent of the population,
Azerbaijan also shares strong religious ties with Iran.
Linguistically, the Kurdish, Tat, and Gushtasbi-Talysh minorities
belong to the family of Iranic languages. (Iran’s Zoroastrian “holy”
book Avesta was originally written in the Gushtasbi-Talysh language.)

Thus, relations between Azerbaijan and Iran should be at least correct
if not cordial. And, yet, the opposite is the case.

Last week, Iran recalled its ambassador from Baku, capital of
Azerbaijan, and closed border passages.

The move came after Azerbaijan arrested 41 people on charges of
espionage for Iran. Azerbaijani journalist Anar Bayramli, who worked
for Iranian media, was also arrested.

As the drama unfolded, two Azerbaijani writers Farid Hussein and
Shahriar Haji-Zadeh disappeared in Iran, presumably seized as
hostages.

Last week, Tehran’s anger rose when Baku hosted a conference on “The
Future of Southern Azerbaijan”. This was a gathering of militants,
mostly US citizens of Iranian origin, who regard all the various
peoples who speak versions of the Azeri language as Turks. It is not
quite clear what they mean by “South Azerbaijan”. But one must assume
that they want Azerbaijan to merge with the five Iranian provinces
where Azeri is widely spoken to form a single new nation of 22 million
people.

Tehran sees the move as a plot hatched by the United States, Israel,
and Turkey against Iran’s territorial integrity.

However, the “unification” plan would mean the disappearance of the
Republic of Azerbaijan in its present shape. In a “greater” Azerbaijan
the people of the republic would become a minority.

Not surprisingly, on Wednesday the daily Kayhan, reflecting the views
of “Supreme Guide” Ali Khamenei called for the “return” of Azerbaijan
to Iran. It suggested that a referendum be held under international
auspices on the subject, giving the people of Azerbaijan the choice of
“returning to their Iranian homeland.”

Hosting secessionists is not the only reason for Tehran’s anger.
Azerbaijan has close ties with Israel including a USD 1.6 billion
contract to purchase arms from the Jewish state. Tehran media claim
that Azerbaijan would give Israel bases to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites.

Iran also regards Azerbaijan’s ties wit Turkey, a member of NATO, as a
potential threat in case of a military clash with the United States.

To add to Tehran’s anger, Azerbaijan has sided with Russia over
dividing the resources of the Caspian Sea including oil and gas and
caviar-bearing fish reserves.

Iran wants the Caspian to be declared an inland sea jointly owned by
its five littoral states. Under that scheme, Iran’s share would be 20
percent. Russia and Kazakhstan want the sea divided according to the
length of each littoral state’s shoreline. Under this scheme, Iran
would end up with 11 percent. At first equivocating on the issue,
Azerbaijan now tilts towards the Russian position while Turkmenistan,
the fifth littoral state, is hedging its bet.

Azerbaijan, too, has complaints against Iran.

The Islamic Republic supports Christian Armenia in its conflict with
Azerbaijan. Without support from Iran, landlocked Armenia would not
have been able to annex Nagorno-Karabakh. It is clear that as long as
Iran backs Armenia, Azerbaijan will not be able to recapture its lost
territories.

Baku has another complaint.

Iran’s ruling mullahs try to incite Azerbaijan’s Gushtasbi-Talysh
minority against the Azeri majority despite the fact that the majority
of the Gushtasbi-Talysh are Sunni Muslims. Baku also accuses Tehran of
trying to foment nationalism among Kurdish, Tat and Lezgins in
Azerbaijan.

Tehran’s mishandling of relations with Azerbaijan is a classic example
of how ideological blindness could turn a nation’s potentially closest
neighbor into an enemy.

Blinded by its anti-Americanism, the Khomeinist regime not only
ignores deep-rooted cultural and historical ties but has also set
aside Islamic or even Shi’ite sensibilities in shaping relations with
Azerbaijan.

Instead of the current tension, under a normal regime Iran would have
been able to draw Azerbaijan close to its ancestral cultural and
historic homeland by opening the borders, merging markets, and
allowing maximum contact between populations on both sides of the Aras
River.

Sadly, however, tension with Azerbaijan need not be surprising. Today,
Iran’s relations with all its neighbors are marked by varying degrees
of mistrust and hostility. A sad story, all round.

From: A. Papazian