Putin notes stable growth of trade with Armenia

ITAR-TASS, Russia
May 8, 2014 Thursday 11:03 PM GMT+4

Putin notes stable growth of trade with Armenia

MOSCOW May 8

– Trade turnover between Russia and Armenia is growing steadily,
President Vladimir Putin said at a meeting with Armenian President
Serzh Sargsyan on Thursday, May 8.

“Last year, trade turnover increased by 10.6 percent from the previous
year and keeps growing this year too. And Russia remains the leading
investor in Armenia,” he said.

Putin recalled that during his latest visit to Armenia important
agreements had been reached and invited Sargsyan to “synchronise
watches” and see “what else needs to be done and where we should speed
up our work”.

Sargsyan said Russian-Armenian relations were developing dynamically
and assured Putin that Yerevan would seek to intensify them.

“We are ready for active work. This is consistent with the historical
tradition of friendship between our nations,” he said.

Russian-Armenian relations are regulated by more than 160 treaties and
agreements, including on friendship, cooperation and mutual
assistance, as well as on allied relations.

In 2012, trade turnover between the two countries exceeded 1.2 billion
U.S. dollars. In the first eight months of 2013 it increased by 10.3
percent year on year.

Before leaving his post in April 2014, Armenian Prime Minister Tigran
Sargsyan said Russia and Armenia cooperated most actively in all areas
of interstate relations without exception. Over the past years,
Russian-Armenian cooperation has developed into a rather complex and
multifaceted structure.

He stressed that Russia plays a key role in ensuring Armenia’s
security and has a leading position in its economy.

“Today Russia plays a key role in Armenia’s security system and it
occupies a leading position in our economy,” he said. “Russia is the
main investor in the Armenian economy, one of its main creditors and
one of the major foreign trade partners.”

“We are interested to improve these relations further, which is fully
consistent with our national interests,” the prime minister said.

“Over the past 20-odd years we have not only preserved the
centuries-old friendship between our peoples but we have also enriched
it with new content and raised it to a qualitatively new level,”
Sargsyan said, adding, “Strategic partnership between Armenia and
Russia has crowned this friendship.”

“We give priority among others to diversification of economic
cooperation between our countries. We are convinced that intensive
interaction in sectors that build up innovation potential will give a
boost to our economic cooperation. This will also allow us to fill our
strategic partnership and allied relations between Russia and Armenia
with new substance,” he said.

The two countries have good prospects in many sectors of the economy,
primarily in the energy sector, the power industry, atomic energy, and
many other serious projects.

There is also a big potential in joint development of the
agro-industrial sector in Armenia.

Putin stressed earlier that Russian-Armenian relations had deep
historical roots, had grown into allied partnership and continued to
develop further.

He also expressed confidence that together Russia and Armenia would be
able to further strengthen their relations and expand cooperation in
various multilateral formats, including in the context of Armenia’s
accession to the Customs Union.

Russia promised active support to Armenia’s efforts to join the Customs Union.

The Customs Union between Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia came into
existence on January 1, 2010. Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia are to go
on with economic integration and vowed to remove all customs borders
between their countries after July 2011.

From: A. Papazian

Concertos As Sounds Of Spring

CONCERTOS AS SOUNDS OF SPRING

New York Times
May 9 2014

Young Concert Artists, which has been fostering the careers of gifted
musicians since 1961, mostly presents the winners of its auditions in
recitals, including a popular series in New York. But it has become
a spring tradition for this essential organization to present a
gala concert featuring select winners from recent years in concerto
performances. Hearing young musicians in concertos reveals further
dimensions of their artistry.

So it was on Wednesday night at Alice Tully Hall for the 53rd Young
Concert Artists Gala Concert, hosted by the organization’s founding
director, Susan Wadsworth. With Carlos Miguel Prieto conducting the
Orchestra of St. Luke’s, three impressive young musicians played
concertos by Copland, Barber and Rachmaninoff.

Narek Arutyunian, an Armenian-born clarinetist currently studying at
the Juilliard School, opened the program with an alluring, stylish
account of Copland’s compact, two-movement Clarinet Concerto, a 1948
work commissioned by Benny Goodman. Mr. Arutyunian brought a rich,
reedy sound to the beguiling first movement, marked “slowly and
expressively,” which has the quality of a mellow, almost lazy waltz.

He brought out pensive, subtle depths in the music while shaping the
winding melodic line in arching phrases. And he excelled in the jazzy,
playful second movement, which is like a 1940s American version of
Stravinsky’s Neo-Classicism, impishly dispatching riffs and bopping
lines while incisively executing the music’s rhythmic gyrations and
irregularities.

The Taiwanese-American violinist Paul Huang, a boyish-looking 23,
gave a masterly account of Barber’s Violin Concerto. His warm, glowing
sound and youthful energy were perfect for the opening movement of
this justly popular work, in which a soaring melodic line flows atop
the harmonically charged, restless orchestra. Yet, Mr. Huang was also
alert to surprising melodic shifts and rhythmic twists in the violin
part. There was nobility and wistful longing to the searching slow
movement. In the fiercely difficult perpetual-motion finale, Mr.

Huang, supported by Mr. Prieto and the orchestra, reined in the
breathless tempo just enough to bring clarity and bite to constant
streams of notes in the violin part, which actually made the music seem
more dangerous and exciting. Mr. Huang was given a rousing ovation.

After intermission, Andrew Tyson, a pianist in the artist
diploma program at Juilliard, gave a coolly commanding account of
Rachmaninoff’s Piano Concerto No. 2. Rather than just tossing off the
scurrying passagework and virtuosic flights, he dug into the music,
bringing out thematic intricacies, making the notes matter. There
are several beloved big-tune moments in this popular concerto, and Mr.

Tyson played them with pliant Romantic expressivity. But his use of
rubato was tasteful and his playing refreshingly direct.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/09/arts/music/three-rising-stars-perform-in-young-concert-artists-gala.html?_r=0

Pope Francis’ Address To Patriarch Karekin II

POPE FRANCIS’ ADDRESS TO PATRIARCH KAREKIN II

Zenit, Italy
May 8 2014

“The ecumenism of suffering and of the martyrdom of blood are a
powerful summons to walk the long path of reconciliation between the
Churches, by courageously and decisively abandoning ourselves to the
working of the Holy Spirit.”

Vatican City, May 09, 2014 (Zenit.org) | 320 hits

Pope Francis received in private audience on May 8 His Holiness Karekin
II, supreme patriarch and catholicos of all Armenians. Here below we
publish the full text of the Holy Father’s discourse.

Your Holiness,

Dear Brothers in Christ,

I gladly offer a most heartfelt welcome to you and to the distinguished
delegation accompanying you. Through Your Holiness, I also extend
respectful and affectionate greetings to the members of the Catholicate
family and to all Armenians around the world. It is a particular
grace to greet you here so close to the tomb of the Apostle Peter
and to share this moment of fraternity and prayer.

With you, I praise the Lord, because in recent years relations
between the Armenian Apostolic Church and the Church of Rome have been
strengthened, thanks to the events which are so dear to our memory.

Here I recall the visit of my sainted predecessor to Armenia in 2001,
and the welcome presence of Your Holiness in the Vatican for the
official visit to Pope Benedict XVI in 2008 and for the inauguration
of my ministry as Bishop of Rome last year.

Here I wish to recall another occasion full of meaning in which Your
Holiness participated: the commemoration of the witnesses to the faith
of the twentieth century, which took place in the context of the Great
Jubilee of the Year 2000. In truth, the number of disciples who shed
their blood for Christ during the tragic events of the last century
is certainly greater than that of the martyrs of the first centuries,
and in this martyrology the children of the Armenian nation have a
place of honour. The mystery of the Cross, precious to the memory of
your people and depicted in the splendid stone crosses which adorn
every corner of your land, has been lived as a direct participation in
the chalice of the Passion by so many of your people. Their witness,
at once tragic and great, must not be forgotten.

Your Holiness, dear Brothers, the sufferings endured by Christians in
these last decades have made a unique and invaluable contribution to
the unity of Christ’s disciples. As in the ancient Church, the blood
of the martyrs became the seed of new Christians. So too in our time
the blood of innumerable Christians has become a seed of unity. The
ecumenism of suffering and of the martyrdom of blood are a powerful
summons to walk the long path of reconciliation between the Churches,
by courageously and decisively abandoning ourselves to the working
of the Holy Spirit. We feel the duty to follow this fraternal path
also out of the debt of gratitude we owe to the suffering so many of
our brothers and sisters, which is salvific because it is united to
the Passion of Christ.

In this regard, I wish to thank Your Holiness for the effective support
given to ecumenical dialogue, and in particular to the work of the
joint commission for theological dialogue between the Catholic Church
and the Oriental Orthodox Churches, and for the skillful theological
contributions offered by representatives of the Catholicate of All
Armenians.

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father
of mercies and the God of all consolation, who consoles us in all
our affliction, so that we may be able to console those who are in
any way afflicted with the consolation with which we ourselves are
consoled by God” (2 Cor 1: 3-4). Full of trust, may we walk the path
that lies ahead of us, sustained by so great a cloud of witnesses
(cf. Heb 12:1), and implore the Father for the unity which Christ
himself prayed for at the Last Supper (cf. Jn 17:21).

Let us pray for each other: may the Holy Spirit enlighten us and
lead us to that day, so greatly desired, in which we can share the
Eucharistic table. We praise God in the words of Saint Gregory of
Narek, “Accept the song of blessing from our lips and deign to grant
to this Church the gifts and graces of Zion and of Bethlehem, so that
we can be made worthy to participate in salvation”. May the all-holy
Mother of God intercede for the Armenian people now and always.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/pope-francis-address-to-patriarch-karekin-ii?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zenit%2Fenglish+%28ZENIT+English%29

Enduring Exile

ENDURING EXILE

By Alia Malek for GUERNICA: A Magazine of Art & Politics

October 15, 2013
A family’s journey from Armenia to Syria and back again.

Members of the Knadjian family at the Abu Artin restaurant and inn,
1959. Courtesy of the Knadjian family Two years ago, in September,
Anto’s neighbors warned him: it was time for him to go. He would no
longer be safe in these hills above the city of Idlib in northwestern
Syria. He knew better than to doubt them.

A descendant of Armenians from Ottoman Turkey, he had inherited a
dormant vigilance that now came to life. Anto’s father used to tell
him, repeating what had been passed down through four generations:
“Like we came from Turkey, we may also one day leave from Syria.”

With his neighbors’ warnings in his ears, Anto scrambled to secure
some cash. He started to quietly sell off whatever he could from Abu
Artin, a restaurant and inn that his family had operated every spring
and summer since 1938. His grandfather had built Abu Artin, named for
Anto’s great-grandfather, high in these hills as an escape for Syrians
living in the swelter of those months in the cities and towns below.

The land offered fresh air, their kitchen delectable food, and the
men–Anto and his father and grandfather before him–impromptu musical
performances that had made them famous with customers.

Anto sold the restaurant’s cutlery and dishware, and the inn’s AC and
heating units, in another village, and at a fraction of their value.

Sentimental items–the portraits of his grandfather and father–he
took to his house in Aleppo, where he lived in the off-season. He
made sure not to tell anyone in the hills when he was coming or going.

Even though he tried downsizing as slowly and as inconspicuously as
possible, soon people began to notice, to circle, and to ask. Syrians
were accustomed to the peering eyes of the government’s many informers,
and generally understood the difference between what information
could get someone in trouble and what just accumulated.

But now, in the chaos that had been building in a speedy crescendo
since spring, no one knew what detail would be damning, and to
which fate.

Anto was marked, a Syrian-Armenian Christian in a Syria of looming
sectarianism. “You’re like an Arab in Tel Aviv,” a man from Idlib
told him.

January and February had brought an end to the dictatorships in
Tunisia and Egypt. By March, it was clear that Syrian President
Bashar al-Assad, who had inherited power from his father, bringing
Assad family rule to a total of forty-one years, did not intend to
follow suit. At the end of the month, his forces had killed 103 unarmed
protesting civilians and had disappeared many more; the exact number,
no one would ever quite know.

So in April 2011, when Anto would have usually opened Abu Artin,
he kept it shuttered instead. No one was driving the 70 kilometers
from Aleppo, Syria’s largest city and home to much of the family’s
clientele over the last seventy-three years. Syrians still untouched
by the violence, in cities like Aleppo, were staying closer to home,
hoping that by ignoring the war in other parts of the country, it
might just go away.

With summer, fruit had ripened, uneaten on the trees in the surrounding
garden. Both restaurant and inn remained idle and empty.

But by September, six months into the uprising and crackdown,
no one could avoid a certain vulgar calculus: Anto was marked,
a Syrian-Armenian Christian in a Syria of looming sectarianism.

Aleppo was home to tens of thousands of other Syrian Armenians, but
in these hills, Anto was alone. “You’re like an Arab in Tel Aviv,”
a man from Idlib told him.

Idlib and the surrounding area were becoming strongholds for opposition
fighters, both secularists and jihadists. In the growing chaos,
religion and ethnicity had become a congenital liability: the wrong
belief or background, at the wrong moment, could be fatal. Guilt had
become collective; one individual could be traded for another of the
same sect or community in escalating cycles of brutality and vengeance.

To the more conservative people in the hills, Anto was already an
affront, with the alcohol serving, singing, and gender-mixing in
his restaurant. For the more ignorant, his being neither Muslim nor
Arab–despite his being Syrian–made him fair game as a scapegoat for
a regime that claimed to be supported by minorities. It also made him
an easy target for kidnappers hoping to net a pretty ransom without
the risk of angering a much more numerous or powerful community. For
those who, in their fervor, believed a better Syria required that
everyone be the same, there would be little room for him. Pragmatic
Syrians reasoned that the casualties would be many before anyone
would stop to consider or even question the hell that they had just
meted upon each other.

Anto had little time to waste, and didn’t want to gamble on the hope
that people might come back to their senses. On an early morning
in October 2011, a month after his neighbors warned him he would
not be safe, Anto went up to the hills. One of the locals joked,
“Why didn’t you tell us you were coming? We were going to kidnap you.”

Anto laughed it off but didn’t say he had come for the last time. He
silently bid goodbye to the trees, the hills, the ground itself. He
nodded to the statue of the Madonna and the little masjid he had
built so Muslim workers or guests could pray.

He paused at the chair where he used to sit with his arghileh,
a water pipe, and gazed at the spot where, as a boy and as a man,
he watched his father and grandfather sing to the rapt diners. He
caressed the walls his great-grandfather had built from the stones
turned up in the dirt all those years ago. This was history; it
was real and couldn’t be erased. Abu Artin was there before Bashar,
before Hafez, before all the presidents.

He fed the stray dog they had taken in and went into a small room
and cried. He wanted to die; he thought his heart might stop of his
own will right there. Where am I going to go? How am I going to take
care of Matilda and the girls?

He dried his tears and went to Mahmoud who had worked for his family
for years, who had held Anto’s father’s hand in the hospital when
he had died. Mahmoud now had a little dikan, a convenience store,
close to Abu Artin.

Anto asked Mahmoud to try to spare some food for the dog each day;
he then handed him the keys to Abu Artin and told him he was returning
to Aleppo.

Anto kissed Mahmoud and said, “May god protect you. God willing we
will see each other again.”

“Don’t come back, mualem,” Mahmoud said.

A week later, Mahmoud told Anto over the phone that the door to the
inn had been broken. What Anto had left behind–toilets, vanities,
mirrors–had all been stolen by some neighbors. Displaced Syrians
from Jisr-al-Shagour had also moved into the empty rooms.

Anto cursed the thieves but didn’t begrudge the squatters; they needed
a place to sleep. They were escaping violence that had claimed their
only homes. Where else should they go?

Anto, his wife, and his three young children all had a place to sleep,
even if he wasn’t sure what would come next, what he would do, how
he would provide. But he would figure it out. He had saved enough and
sold enough that for the next several months, he–they–could survive,
as their ancestors had before them, in the safety of Aleppo.

* * * Before winter gave way to spring in 1915, Abkar’s
Turkish neighbors warned him: something was coming. Armenian subjects
of the Ottoman Empire–like Abkar and his family–would soon be in
great danger. Abkar was a puppeteer, and the stories he would weave
and animate by night with his marionettes had made Abkar beloved by
Armenians and Turks alike. So they gave him a head start.

He packed his puppets, dug up his gold, and stole away quickly,
under darkness, on foot with his wife and six children.

On his heels was one of the twentieth century’s first genocides.

The Ottoman Empire’s extermination of its Armenian population is
generally said to have begun on the night of April 24, 1915, when
the Ottoman government rounded up and imprisoned over two hundred
Armenian notables and leaders, the majority of whom were summarily
executed shortly after.

Inhabitants of Armenian villages–men, women, children, and the
elderly–were massacred, butchered, burned, or drowned in the
Black Sea.

Extermination camps were set up. The vast majority was deported to
Aleppo, a city in Ottoman-controlled Syria, literally at the end of
the line of the railroad. Since its founding in the sixth millennium
B.C., Aleppo had been populated by Muslims, Christians, Jews, and a
small local Arabicized Armenian community.

>From Aleppo, the Ottomans forced the corralled Armenians to march
into the Syrian Desert, ostensibly to another deportation center,
but the death march was in fact the point. They were not provided
cover from the sun, nor food or water. Sometimes they were marched
in circles until they collapsed. Most died in the desert, the dust
of their bones still discernable today among the grains of sand.

In August of 1915, the New York Times cited an account that reported
“the roads and the Euphrates are strewn with corpses of exiles,
and those who survive are doomed to certain death since they will
find neither house, work, nor food in the desert. It is a plan to
exterminate the whole Armenian people.”

Though Aleppo in the beginning was a point of transfer, it later
became a place of rescue and relief, and even later a site of memory.

The city was already home to an Arabicized Armenian population that
had been in Syria since at least the eleventh century. In fact,
religiously inspired Armenians–Armenia was one of the world’s first
Christian countries–had been traveling and settling long before
among northern Syria’s sites of Christian pilgrimage.

Armenians who survived the 1915 genocide and moved around the world
all passed first through Syria. In the Armenian imagination, Syria
is a place of refuge and rebirth.

By late 1915 and onwards, aid efforts were concentrated in Aleppo and
sprawling refugee camps were set up to care for the Armenians. They
would later become bustling Armenian neighborhoods, as tents became
cement, and the camps evolved from limbo to permanency. What was
considered by Armenians “Western Armenia”–delineated from Eastern,
modern-day Armenia by the magnificent summit of Ararat–ceased to exist
as its people and its traces were cleansed from lands that became
modern-day Turkey. Its language, churches, schools, and its people
were instead resuscitated, rebuilt, and preserved in Aleppo. Many
Armenians stayed, made Syria their home, and became Syrian, the
community numbering an estimated 150,000 at its peak in the 1990s.

Others left to Lebanon, Europe, South America, or the United States,
the many communities that today make up the Armenian Diaspora. But
they all passed first through Syria, and in the collective Armenian
imagination, Aleppo in particular and Syria in general is a place of
refuge and rebirth.

When Abkar and his family left their land in Urfa, they walked on
foot to Antep, then Killis, finally arriving in Aleppo. There, he
kept his puppets packed, worked as a portrait photographer, and soon
started a small restaurant to serve the growing community of genocide
survivors, nostalgic for home. Abkar also wanted to seduce the local
Syrian population with the spicier flavors of the Anatolian kitchen.

Abkar’s son, Artin, who had arrived in Syria as a little boy, would
later open a summer restaurant and rest-house in the untouched hills
above Idlib. Artin named his getaway with the epithet Syrian Arabs
used for his father: Abu (father of) Artin. He had chosen to marry a
local Armenian woman named Zakeya, who spoke Arabic, not his native
Western Armenian. Music was the language they shared; he had fallen
in love with her the moment he had heard her strum the melancholy
notes of the oud. She was widowed, and Artin married her and raised
her three children with her, to which they added two of their own,
Bedrous and Antranig, who died at age eighteen. Bedrous would name
his own son, Anto, for that lost brother.

Song, theater, and storytelling remained in their homes and souls,
and there, in the safety of Aleppo, Abkar’s family and his descendants
would flourish.

* * * In 1993, the first time Anto went to Armenia,
he arrived with only the clothes on his back and the traditional
Armenian costume he wore when he performed. He was twenty-five years
old and traveling with a dance troupe of Syrian Armenians to a music
festival across Armenia; somewhere between Aleppo and Yerevan, their
belongings had been lost.

Armenia was newly independent, having, like other republics,
broken away in nationalist catharsis from the Soviet Union as it had
disintegrated. Armenians from across the Diaspora would be performing
over the next two weeks, and Anto relished the opportunity to do what
he loved best, what was in his family’s blood: to sing, to dance,
and to play music.

He was curious to visit Armenia, even if it wasn’t really Armenia,
and he wasn’t really from this Armenia.

For him and the other Syrians, their homeland lay to the west of
towering Ararat, the snow-capped mountain that dominated Yerevan’s
horizon. Like Ararat itself, their Western Armenia lay across a
sealed border in Turkey. This Armenia, what they called Eastern
Armenia, was all that remained of the erstwhile kingdom. Genocide
and expulsion had erased Western Armenia, leaving it to memory. Its
culture, institutions, cuisine, and language–different than those of
Eastern Armenia–had been carried into exile by those who had fled and
survived the slaughter, resuscitated and reconstituted in their homes,
their kitchens. If the heritage of Western Armenia lived anywhere,
it was in Aleppo.

Yet Ararat, so looming in the sky that it seemed easy enough to touch,
was also an open wound, a constant reminder of that other side and
all that was lost to it.

The summit had cleaved history, dividing the destinies of these
two Armenias. There was Western Armenia, once brutalized but now
thriving in the Arab World and on the Mediterranean Sea, and there
was Eastern Armenia, impoverished and hungry in the rugged Caucuses,
in the spheres of Persia and Russia, in both ancient and modern times.

It wasn’t only Armenia that had to navigate the USSR’s demise; Syria
too had benefited from Soviet patronage, which it sought to replace
with American friendship. Syria joined the U.S.-led coalition to
invade Iraq in 1991 and was rewarded with an occupation, green-lighted
by the United States, of Lebanon and with peace negotiations with
Israel. Yet, after nearly five thousand years in historic Syria, the
last fifty years of conflict between the modern-day states of Syria
and Israel had made Jews an uncomfortable inconvenience for both. In
1992, Syria’s remaining four thousand Jews left in quiet exodus.

This excision did not go unnoticed by Anto or other Syrians, who
wondered whether a precedent had just been set–that “being Syrian”
could be qualified and classified in tiers. But such thoughts were
quashed and eyes were averted; this was a “special case” after all.

Jewish nationalism and war with Israel–that essential conflict in the
Arab world–was what had made being Jewish and Arab a contradiction.

There were, they thought, no other such contradictions.

If for Syria it was an era in which the country seemed to be coming
out of isolation and into the light, in Armenia it was one of darkness,
literally. A war with neighbor Azerbaijan had brought an energy embargo
to Armenia. Without enough electricity, the nights in this fledgling
state were passed by candlelight. There were also shortages of food,
and the Armenian Diaspora, including the wealthy community in Syria,
had to bolster its homeland’s economy with remittances. Georgia and
Iran, on Armenia’s other shared borders, were the country’s only
lifeline to the rest of the world.

When Anto told his mother in early 2012 that he was leaving Syria
and moving to Armenia, she was aghast. “The mafia will kidnap you,”
she said. “And you and Matilda will get divorced.”

The organizers of the festival had warned the Syrians and the other
international Armenians not to stay out after dark. It seemed to Anto
as if they were in another century, tied as they were to the presence
of the sun in the sky. Fitting then, that they were wandering around
Yerevan in costumes from a bygone time and world.

He pitied this place. Was it any wonder most Syrian Armenians had
ignored Armenian nationalist calls to “come back” to Armenia? He
fell into easier conversation with the other Diaspora performers who
had traveled from as far away as Argentina and who spoke in the same
Western Armenian cadence as he. Anto was also hungry, having refused to
eat the food, which he found inedible. Even bread was hard to come by.

Yet some things felt familiar–the architecture of the churches,
the contours of the faces, and mostly, the songs. Musically, Anto
felt like he had been in Armenia for a hundred years.

On their third night in this not-quite homeland, after the troupe had
performed in the mountains outside of Yerevan, they were hurtling
down dark and curving roads in a bus provided by the festival. It
was already past midnight, and the driver seemed eager to drop
them at their hotel and continue to his own destination. Finally,
he pulled over and told the Syrians to get out: they had arrived
where they would be sleeping. Barely able to see their own hands in
front of them in the darkness, they found their way to the door and
knocked. The driver had already sped away.

A woman dressed all in white answered, her face lit only by the candle
she held.

“We are the group from Syria,” they announced to her.

“Welcome,” she said. “We are waiting for a group from Syria.”

As they followed behind her, barely able to see anything in the
blackness, Anto could hear the woman rapping on doors and saying, “The
Syrian troupe is here. Get up! There are people who want to sleep.”

He felt hurried movement in response and sensed something was amiss.

He whispered to one of the Syrians, “We’re not in the right place.”

The woman showed the eighteen of them to empty rooms with scant
furniture and offered them vodka and cognac in dirty glasses. They
could hear dogs howling outside. Anto pulled back the curtains to see
what could be seen, only to discover there were no windows, only the
plaster of the walls.

Left to themselves, the men assured the women that there was nothing to
fear. They arranged themselves on the floor or on whatever furniture
they found. Anto didn’t plan to sleep; he had heard back home that
Armenia was a country of thieves. Yet, despite himself, he drifted off.

He woke only when he was shaken. “Wake up, wake up!”

A member of the troupe had come running in from another room. “The
government has been looking for us,” he said. “Thank God they
found us.”

Only in the light of day, after they had emerged from the secondary
darkness of their windowless room, did they see that their driver
had not delivered them to a hotel.

The woman in white was a nurse. They had taken refuge from the darkness
in an asylum for the abandoned and insane.

* * * When Anto told his mother in early 2012 that he was
leaving Syria and moving to Armenia, she was aghast.

“There, the mafia will kidnap you,” she said. “And you and Matilda
will get divorced.”

She was convinced, like many others in the Armenian community and in
Aleppo itself, that what was happening in other parts of Syria would
not–could not–reach them.

What Anto had lost in Idlib made him believe otherwise. After
retreating to Aleppo, living off the revenue he had raised from
selling what he could at Abu Artin, he also decided to sell his house
in the city. The community gossiped. Why would he do such a desperate
thing? He told them he had debts to pay, letting people speculate
about which way he had failed as a man and as a provider.

With Aleppo oblivious to what was coming, he got a price for the
house that suggested nothing of a country at war. He took his head
start and the money and went in February to scout a life in Yerevan.

The city had changed since his first visit in 1993. Diaspora money
had poured in, and there were glitzy new hotels, offices, shops, and
streets in the city center. Anto had continued to come frequently to
Armenia, where he had pursued and exercised his musical ambitions,
recording and producing records–singing in Armenian came easier
than Arabic. He knew Yerevan well enough, and he wanted to start a
restaurant in Armenia. Quickly, he found the space he thought perfect
to rent.

He could barely afford the modest place, which had previously been
occupied by another restaurant named “New Antep,” after a city in
Ottoman Turkey that had been home to Armenians for centuries before the
genocide. New Antep had scaled up, and Anto decided that at the old
New Antep, he would open New Urfa, named for his great-grandfather’s
city, similarly cleansed of its Armenians. He would serve the same
food that had travelled with his family and survivors over a century
and across borders.

But when he went back to Aleppo, he had second thoughts. This was a
land that he loved. This was his city, and maybe it really would all
be over as quickly as it had started.

Then he thought of his young children and found his resolve again. By
May, he moved them and Matilda to Yerevan. Slowly, customers began to
arrive at New Urfa. He knew that in summer, when many Syrian Armenians
and other Western Armenians would come for vacation, insistent on
the food of home, business would pick up.

Armenia fast-tracked visas and citizenships for Syrian Armenians,
many of whom had long scoffed at the idea of a passport from Armenia,
seeing no need.

In June, Syrians arriving from Aleppo told him that the troubles
would all be resolved–even before their vacations ended. Then, in
July, began the battle for Aleppo itself. Fighting engulfed the city
and would eventually leave much of it in ruins. Syrians–including
Anto’s brother and sister–extended their stays in Armenia, saying
they would wait out the rough period in Yerevan. Many still thought
it would all be over in weeks.

When September came, their summer clothes and shoes were no longer
enough to keep them warm against the chill of evening. In October, with
the school year about to begin in Syria and their children stranded in
Yerevan, Syrian Armenian families approached the government for help
opening a school that would follow the Syrian curriculum. From a single
set of Arabic textbooks flown out of Syria, they made photocopies,
hoping that when they returned to Syria, the children would not have
missed a step.

Armenia fast-tracked visas and citizenships for Syrian Armenians,
many of whom had long scoffed at the idea of a passport from Armenia,
seeing no need. The government also offered Syrians free medical
care and allowed them to pay tuition at the universities at the low
local rate. The country waived certain fees and taxes involved in
longer-term stays, and soon cars with Syrian license plates could be
seen all over Yerevan.

Governmental and private groups helped Syrian Armenians find jobs and
transfer their businesses to Armenia. After all, the community in
Aleppo was industrious and prosperous, and Armenia needed people,
investment, and a jolt to an economy that depended greatly on
remittances. Many saw an answer to Armenia’s problems in Syria’s loss.

Some in Armenia also seized on fears of violence in Syria and memories
of the Ottoman genocide to push nationalist goals, particularly
the return or “repatriation” of all Armenians to the country. They
argued that the “it will all work out” mentality had cost them lives
in the genocide.

At New Urfa, Anto mounted a large flat screen TV and set the satellite
dish to channels from Syria. In September 2012, a year after that first
warning to leave Idlib, Anto watched the historic souks of Aleppo burn.

“I cannot cry now,” he said. “I have no time. I have to feed my
family. I have to survive in this new country. If my situation gets
better and I can relax, I will cry.”

In December, on the eve of Christmas Eve, his mother died alone in
her house in Aleppo. She had chosen to remain, even as snipers and
violence trapped her, like many Aleppans, inside. She had passed the
time in front of the television, ignoring the news and watching the
Turkish soap operas she adored, in a language she still knew better
than Arabic.

Last month marked Anto’s second year in Yerevan, and the first
anniversary of Aleppo’s destruction. But he is no longer sure how to
measure time. Are the events to be marked, to be mourned, in Urfa,
or in Idlib, or Aleppo, or Yerevan?

“I miss the past,” he says, but keeps moving forward, every day making
more grape leaves and manti and kibbeh and kababs at New Urfa, still
unsure, like his patrons, if permanence is always illusory.

This article was supported by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting,
and is published in collaboration with the Ochberg Society for Trauma
Journalism.

Alia Malek is Senior Staff Writer at Al Jazeera America. She is a
civil rights lawyer and journalist who has lived and worked in the
U.S., Lebanon, the West Bank, Syria, and Italy. She is the author of A
Country Called Amreeka: U.S. History Retold Through Arab American Lives
and the editor of Patriot Acts: Narratives of Post 9/11 Injustice. Her
work has appeared in the New York Times, The Nation, Foreign Policy,
Salon, The Christian Science Monitor, The Columbia Journalism Review,
Granta, andMcSweeney’s.

Alia Malek is an author and civil rights lawyer. Born in Baltimore
to Syrian immigrant parents, she began her legal career as a trial
attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division.

After working in the legal field in the U.S., Lebanon, and the
West Bank, Malek, who has degrees from Johns Hopkins and Georgetown
Universities, earned her master’s degree in journalism from Columbia
University. Her reportage has appeared in The New York Times, Granta,
The Nation, Foreign Policy,Salon, The Christian Science Monitor, The
WashingtonPost.com, The Columbia Journalism Review, and McSweeney’s.

A Country Called Amreeka is her first book:

From: A. Papazian

http://www.guernicamag.com/features/enduring-exile/
http://www.aliamalek.com/amreeka/

Vache Kahramanian Announces Run For Local Australian Council

VACHE KAHRAMANIAN ANNOUNCES RUN FOR LOCAL AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL

May 8, 2014

Vache Kahramanian

WILLOUGHBY, Australia–Lifelong Willoughby resident, accountant and
human rights lobbyist, Vache Kahramanian has announced that he will
contest the vacant Willoughby City Council seat in the electorate’s
Sailors Bay ward.

Kahramanian, 28, aims to bring “fiscal professionalism” and “youthful
dynamism” to Willoughby City Council if elected on Saturday, 14th
June 2014. The election is a by-election for the sole available seat
on Council, which opened up when Councilor Gail Giles-Gidney was
elected Mayor to replace the late Pat Riley.

The Sailors Bay ward encompasses Castlecrag, Northbridge and South
Willoughby; all areas well known to Kahramanian, who said: “Willoughby
is the only City I’ve known. I was a Willoughby son, a Willoughby
student, a Willoughby professional, and now a Willoughby husband,
a Willoughby ratepayer, a Willoughby shopper and a Willoughby diner.”

Kahramanian is a certified practicing accountant (CPA), who has
worked for global firms including PricewaterhouseCoopers and CoverMore
Travel Insurance.

“We have all read about the concerns Willoughby residents have about
the state of the City’s finances, especially since the development of
The Concourse,” he said. “I, for one, will feel a lot more comfortable
if at least one of my Councilors was an accountant. I intend to be
your fiscal professional in Council.”

Kahramanian, who also holds a Graduate Diploma in International Law
and International Relations from the University of New South Wales,
currently heads the Armenian National Committee of Australia (ANC
Australia); an advocacy group that lobbies all levels of government
for its community’s local, national and international interests.

“I know how politics works,” Kahramanian continued. “I know my way
around the Parliament Houses in Canberra and on Macquarie Street. I
have legislative runs on the board, having led the passage of multiple
motions in the NSW and South Australian governments, among others.”

On local issues, Kahramanian said he intends to be a politician in
the word’s “purest definition”, explaining: “If elected as councilor,
I will always default to what the majority of my constituents demand,
while always trying to represent and incorporate the minority view.”

He did outline his positions on key local issues, though.

On rate increases, Kahramanian says: “At my core, I am against
increasing rates, or increases on any types of taxes for that matter.

That is the easy way out. It should always be the very last resort,
and even then, it should be taken to an election.”

On traffic congestion and overdevelopment, he says: “Overdevelopment
is unacceptable to me. Willoughby needs to remain pure and only grow
to the extent that its roads and infrastructure allows.”

On the Willoughby Leisure Centre, Kahramanian says: “The Willoughby
Leisure Centre is where I learned to swim, and watched many games
of basketball. It is tired and needs to be redeveloped in one swoop,
as quickly as possible.”

On the divisive issues surrounding Northbridge Plaza, he says: “The
Northbridge Plaza expansion-slash-carpark situation is problematic. I
understand the corporate realities of operating a mall, while I also
realise that expansion could mean hell for traffic, and hell for
other smaller shopping villages and businesses. The end resolution
must be to the benefit of the community.”

And on the unique Haven Amphitheatre, he states: “The Haven
Amphitheatre is an area close to my heart, having performed on that
stage as a student at Willoughby Public School. I’ll work with all
stakeholders to find the best solution to ensure that the amphitheatre
is reopened so that generations to come can enjoy this unique space.”

Kahramanian also plans to ensure that more of the local community is
able to make use of The Concourse, which is a world class entertainment
venue developed by Council and managed by a private firm.

Kahramanian said: “The Concourse is the greatest infrastructure project
in our great City’s recent history, but unfortunately many groups have
been priced out of using this venue. I’ll fight to ensure fairer use
of The Concourse for all.”

Vache Kahramanian has taken leave from his duties as the Executive
Director of ANC Australia while he runs his Willoughby City Council
campaign.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.horizonweekly.ca/news/details/38005

President Sargsyan Participates In Victory Day Events In Artsakh

PRESIDENT SARGSYAN PARTICIPATES IN VICTORY DAY EVENTS IN ARTSAKH

13:31 09.05.2014

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has left for the Nagorno Karabakh
Republic for a working visit, President’s Press Office reported.

The President participates in the events dedicated to the 69th
anniversary of the Victory n the Great Patriotic War, the Day of the
NKR Defense Army and the 22nd anniversary of liberation of Shushi.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armradio.am/en/2014/05/09/president-sargsyan-participates-in-victory-day-events-in-artsakh/

Shoushi Liberation Proved That Armenian Soldier Is Invincible- May 9

SHOUSHI LIBERATION PROVED THAT ARMENIAN SOLDIER IS INVINCIBLE- MAY 9 IS TRIPLE VICTORY DAY FOR ARMENIANS

11:36 â~@¢ 09.05.14

It is exactly 22 years that the May 9 Day of Victory and Peace has
been having a triple significance for the Armenian nation.

The liberation of Shoushi, a town-fortress in the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic (Artsakh), added to the glorious victory in the Great
Patriotic War in the 1940’s. The Nagorno-Karabakh Army came into
existence shortly afterwards.

“The liberation of Shoushi can be definitely described as a drastic
landmark in the Artsakh War, which eventually shattered our belief
that the Turk is invincible. No wonder that Shoushi marked the chain
of victories: Artsakh was liberated in 1993-1994, the long-awaited
ceasefire being concluded in 1994. ” historian Ashot Melkonyan told
Tert.am.

He described the liberation of Shoushi as an outstanding victory in
the history of Armenians. “Shoushi came to prove that the Armenian
soldier is undefeated. When condemned, [an Armenian] prefers the most
difficult path in the most inextricable situation. In a blockade and
isolated from Armenia, Shoushi was liberated on the night of May 9.

And a week later, it opened way to the Republic of Armenia through
the Lachin corridor,” the historian added.

He said it isn’t right to attribute the military operation that led
to the town’s liberation to single individuals. “The entire Armenian
nation had its contribution here without any exaggeration,” he said,
naming all the legendary hero veterans who had developed the plan.

The historian said he doesn’t agree with those who underestimate the
younger generation’s potential of committing heroic feats. “I do not
absolutely share that opinion. I am sure that this generation will
fight if destined to. Many young people who are next to us may become
heroes tomorrow,” he noted.

Melkonyan further stressed the importance of strengthening the freedom
and turning it into an enduring peace, without losing an inch of land.

Shoushi, a strategically important town of Artsakh from where
Azerbaijanis continuously bombed capital Stepanakert, was fully
liberated 22 years ago this day.

The event is considered the first big victory in the Artsakh liberation
war. The heroic operation also created economic advantages for the
entire country which was in a state of collapse in the wake of missile
attacks against Stepanakert and the neighboring towns and villages.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.tert.am/en/news/2014/05/09/shushi/

L’assemblee De Californie Vote Pour L’independance Du Haut-Karabagh

L’ASSEMBLEE DE CALIFORNIE VOTE POUR L’INDEPENDANCE DU HAUT-KARABAGH

ETATS-UNIS

Avec une majorité écrasante de 70 voix contre une l’Assemblée
d’Etat de Californie a voté le 8 mai son soutien au droit a
l’autodétermination du Haut Karabagh et a appelé les Etats-Unis
a la reconnaissance de son indépendance. Le texte doit désormais
être proposé au Sénat pour être ratifié. ” Avec une majorité
écrasante l’ Assemblée de l’Etat de Californie appuie la population
du Haut -Karabakh et réaffirme son engagement indéfectible a la
cause de la liberté et de l’autodétermination de tous les peuples
“, a souligné le Président de l’Assemblée John A. Perez .

“Cette résolution représente une étape importante dans la
reconnaissance de la République du Haut-Karabakh en tant que nation
indépendante . Je tiens tout particulièrement a remercier mon
collègue M.Gatto qui porté cette question devant l’Assemblée. Je
suis fier de l’état de Californie qui a adopté cette résolution AJR
32 qui soutient la lutte de la RHK pour la liberté ” , a déclaré
Katcho Achadjian, co-auteur de cette résolution et membre de
l’Assemblée de Californie.

vendredi 9 mai 2014, Ara ©armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=99732

BAKU: U.S. Plan For Nagorno-Karabakh Resolution To Unlock Era Of Pro

U.S. PLAN FOR NAGORNO-KARABAKH RESOLUTION TO UNLOCK ERA OF PROSPERITY

AzerNews, Azerbaijan
May 8 2014

8 May 2014, 12:47 (GMT+05:00)
By Sara Rajabova

U.S. co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group James Warlick spoke about the
keys to a settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Warlick’s speech “Nagorno-Karabakh: The Keys to a Settlement” took
place on May 7, at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
the U.S. Department of State said.

“Our goal should be to find a pragmatic way forward to bring about
a lasting settlement,” Warlick said.

He noted that his statement reflects official U.S. Government policy
that guides the U.S. engagement as the country helps the parties
find peace.

“And peace is within reach. The sides have come to a point where
their positions on the way forward are not that far apart. They
have almost reached agreement on several occasions – most recently
in 2011. And when they inevitably returned to the negotiating table
after each failed round, the building blocks of the next “big idea”
were similar to the last time,” Warlick said.

“There is a body of principles, understandings, and documents
already on the table that lay out a deal, and no one has suggested
we abandon them,” he said, noting that the challenge is to find a
way to help the sides take last, bold step forward to bridge their
remaining differences and deliver the peace and stability that their
populations deserve.

Warlick said for two decades, however, peace has been elusive. “All
parties distrust each other and a generation of young people has
grown up in Armenia and Azerbaijan with no first-hand experience of
each other. As many have noted, older generations remember a time
when Armenians and Azerbaijanis lived side-by-side and differences
did not need to be resolved through the barrel of a gun.”

He noted that resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will unlock
a new era of prosperity across the region.

Warlick said the benefits of peace far outweigh the costs of
continued stalemate, and avoid the catastrophic consequences of
renewed hostilities.

“Armenia would immediately benefit from open borders, greater
security, and new opportunities to trade, travel, and engage with
all its neighbors. Azerbaijan would eliminate a key impediment to its
growth as a player on the world stage, regional trade hub, and strong
security partner, while giving hundreds of thousands of refugees and
internally displaced persons a prospect for reconciliation and return,”
Warlick said.

He noted that a peace agreement, properly designed and implemented,
would also eliminate the tragic, steady stream of casualties – both
military and civilian – along the border and the line of contact.

“Numbers are hard to pin down, but there have already been at least
a dozen killed and even more injured on the front lines this year so
far. This is unacceptable,” Warlick said.

“Next week will mark 20 years since a ceasefire agreement was signed.

While we can take some pride in having avoided a return to outright
war, we must also agree that the current state of affairs is
unacceptable, and unsustainable,” Warlick noted.

He said the sides live under threat from sniper fire and landmines,
they are concerned for the lives of their civilian populations and
their access to farmland, cemeteries, and buildings that happen to
fall “too close” to the line of contact or the international border
between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Warlick further noted that the OSCE monitors have been working for two
decades to keep an eye on this fragile peace, but have neither the
mandate nor the resources to put a stop to the frequent casualties,
or even to identify responsibility.

He informed that he will visit the Nagorno-Karabakh region next week
together with the other co-chairs.

Warlick pointed out that both presidents want to make progress and
agree that the series of documents negotiated over the past several
years contains the outlines of a deal.

“The co-chairs hosted the presidents in Vienna last November. This was
their first meeting since January 2012 – and the first time since 2009
for them to meet one-on-one. We were encouraged by their conversation,
and by their stated commitment to find a way forward. Since that
time, we have met on ten separate occasions with one or both foreign
ministers to keep the discussion alive,” Warlick said.

He noted that only the presidents have the ability to conclude a deal
with such transformative consequences for their countries. “It is the
presidents who must take the bold steps needed to make peace. The
United States has pressed both leaders to meet again soon and take
advantage of this window of opportunity when peace is possible.”

Warlick said the time had come for a renewed effort to bring peace
to the region.

He highlighted the joint statements by Presidents Barack Obama, Dmitriy
Medvedev, and Nicola Sarkozy in L’Aquila in 2009 and Muskoka in 2010,
saying these principles and elements form the basis of U.S.

policy toward the Minsk Group and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

“At the heart of a deal are the UN Charter and relevant documents
and the core principles of the Helsinki Final Act. In particular,
we focus on those principles and commitments that pertain to the
non-use or threat of force, territorial integrity, and equal rights
and self-determination of peoples,” Warlick noted.

He said there are six elements that will have to be part of any peace
agreement if it is to endure. “While the sequencing and details of
these elements remains the subject of negotiations, they must be
seen as an integrated whole. Any attempt to select some elements over
others will make it impossible to achieve a balanced solution.”

Warlick further went over these elements:

“First, in light of Nagorno-Karabakh’s complex history, the sides
should commit to determining its final legal status through a mutually
agreed and legally binding expression of will in the future. This is
not optional. Interim status will be temporary.

Second, the area within the boundaries of the former Nagorno-Karabakh
Autonomous Region that is not controlled by Baku should be granted an
interim status that, at a minimum, provides guarantees for security
and self-governance.

Third, the occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh should be
returned to Azerbaijani control. There can be no settlement without
respect for Azerbaijan’s sovereignty, and the recognition that its
sovereignty over these territories must be restored.

Fourth, there should be a corridor linking Armenia to
Nagorno-Karabakh. It must be wide enough to provide secure passage,
but it cannot encompass the whole of Lachin district.

Fifth, an enduring settlement will have to recognize the right of
all IDPs and refugees to return to their former places of residence.

Sixth and finally, a settlement must include international security
guarantees that would include a peacekeeping operation. There is
no scenario in which peace can be assured without a well-designed
peacekeeping operation that enjoys the confidence of all sides.”

Warlick said the time has come for the sides to commit themselves to
peace negotiations, building on the foundation of work done so far.

He noted when such negotiations commence, the parties should not
only reconfirm their commitment to the ceasefire but also undertake
much-needed and long-sought security confidence-building measures.

Warlick said the Minsk Group co-chairs share a common interest in
helping the sides reach a peaceful resolution. “We intend to continue
working through the Minsk Group as the primary channel for resolving
this conflict. The United States stands ready to help in any way
we can. I would also call on the diaspora communities in the United
States and around the world to speak out for peace and to help bring
an end to this conflict.”

He said it is up to the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan to take
the first step, noting they should consider measures, even unilateral
ones that will demonstrate their stated commitment to making progress,
reducing tensions, and improving the atmosphere for negotiations.

Warlick underlined that a lasting peace must be built not on a piece
of paper, but on the trust, confidence, and participation of the
people of both countries.

From: A. Papazian

http://www.azernews.az/azerbaijan/66842.html

Analyst: Intensified US efforts on Karabakh conditioned by Crimea de

Analyst: Intensified US efforts on Karabakh conditioned by Crimea developments

May 10, 2014 | 18:33

YEREVAN. ` The United States are intensifying their efforts on
Karabakh issue, political analyst Manvel Sargsyan said.
He believes this can be explained by geopolitical reasons, namely
necessity of finding solution to Karabakh conflict amid Crimea crisis.

The American side, in particular, Co-Chair James Warlick hinted at
intensification of efforts, Sargsyan told Armenian News-NEWS.am.

As to address of the U.S. Embassy to those criticizing Warlick’s
remarks, the analyst said American side in fact highlighted three
equal possibilities for Karabakh settlement.

`Interestingly, the Americans pointed at three variants [a negotiated
settlement, unacceptable status quo, or war ` ed.]. They could have
other wordings, for example compromise or war, so they gave `broader’
opportunities,’ he emphasized.

In his latest speech James Warlick outlined U.S. position on the peace
process, and presented six elements that have to be part of peace
agreement on Karabakh.

News from Armenia – NEWS.am

From: A. Papazian