Armen At The Bazaar

June 24th, 2010

Armen At The Bazaar – (Independent)

Armen At The Bazaar
Steve Lalla

Montreal’s Armen Bazarian’s debut EP is a soft and short, breezy little
folk/pop package that easily captures the heart. While built firmly on the
foundation of Armen’s clean tone guitar playing and beautiful voice,
excellent studio work subtly introduces harmonic vocal layers, distorted
guitar, echoes and violin into the mix – like a pretty carousel of pastel
sounds blissfully rotating by in the kaleidoscopic background. Brian Wilson
would be proud. Only the minute-long Animal Collective-ish Tribal Interlude
has any percussion and this, combined with the EP’s intelligent songwriting,
carefree spirit, originality and painful brevity, leaves one itching for a
stronger dose from this promising newcomer.

From: A. Papazian

It may take years to move from principles to a peace treaty

It may take years to move from principles to a peace treaty, Alexander
Iskandaryan says

armradio.am
28.06.2010 18:48

Director of the Caucasus Institute Alexander Iskandaryan considers
that the statement of the leaders of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs
countries includes nothing new. `It actually reiterates what had been
declared earlier,’ he said in an interview with `Radiolur.’

`However, this times the presidents of the co-chair countries have
made clear the framework of principles they propose to the parties
without labeling them as Madrid Principles or updated Madrid
Principles. Sure, this does not mean that the proposals are realistic
or realizable,’ Alexander Iskandaryan said.

`This is not a document or a treaty. It’s just a rather fragile
framework of principles,’ the analyst says, adding that proclamation
of principles and signing of a treaty are two completely different
issues.

`It may take years to move from principles to a peace treaty.
Agreement on basic principles does not mean agreement on everything.
There are a number of issues to be clarified for the agreement on
these principles to grow into a concrete treaty,’ he said.

From: A. Papazian

Foreign language schools give birth to`love for foreign languages

Foreign language schools give birth to`love for foreign languages

`Who says that we are against the foreign language, for God’s sake, go
and learn as many languages as you want. It is even very important to
learn the language of the rivaling country. But you shouldn’t do that
instead of your mother tongue,’ said Hovhannes Saroyan and added that
the important thing is not the amount of schools but the pupils.

`Such schools will give birth to a bigger polarization effect,” the
speaker thinks, reasoning that the reopening of the foreign schools
will ruin the bases of our language. He also thinks that the reopening
of the foreign language schools brings to `love for foreign
languages, which has no limits’.

To the question why the state inspection of language is not showing an
adequate reaction to the changes and amendments in the `Law on
Language’ and `the law on public education’ H. Saroyan answered, `no
one is on its place.’

`Everyone should be on his place, but it is not like that, the real
expert is being dismissed and the fellows or relatives take the place.

June 24, 2010
Aysor.am

From: A. Papazian

`VivaCell-MTS Bonus’ for prepaid subscribers

`VivaCell-MTS Bonus’ for prepaid subscribers

VivaCell-MTS, a subsidiary of `Mobile TeleSystems’ OJSC, has announced
that subscribers can get free airtime, SMS messages, gifts and much
more using VivaCell-MTS services.

One just needs to send the word BONUS to the short number 5050 and
start accumulating points. It is also possible to register from the
`Internet Assistant’ portal or by dialing *505#. Registration fee is
AMD 10 (including VAT).

After registration, for each AMD 100 spent on VivaCell-MTS services
the subscriber will get 1 point. Having accumulated sufficient number
of points, one can exchange them for gifts with their list growing
continuously. At the moment the gifts include unlimited on-net calls
and SMS, on-net air-time, SMS and Internet packages, and MTC 236
mobile phones.

The full list of the gifts and other details of the program can be
found at `VivaCell-MTS bonus’ web page – Bonus.vivacell.am.

Jun 23, 2010
Aysor.am

From: A. Papazian

ISTANBUL: A view from Yerevan

Sunday’s Zaman, Turkey
June 27 2010

A view from Yerevan

AMANDA PAUL [email protected] Columnists

I write this column from Armenia, where I have spent a week meeting
with representatives from the government, the opposition and civil
society. Two issues dominated the discussions: the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict and the failed rapprochement with Turkey. As one senior
official put it, `Things are really screwed up now.’
For Armenia the rapprochement with Turkey broke down because of
Ankara’s decision to link it to Nagorno-Karabakh. Yerevan considers
itself blameless, saying it made big concession, with one official
stating, `Armenia made Turkey a very generous offer, we did not even
ask them to recognize the genocide,’ but that, `once again,’ Turkey
cheated them. For Armenia this was the first time they had the
opportunity to be a regional player and Yerevan believes that Armenia
has proved to be a proactive rather than a reactive player and they
have gained from the experience, including now having a far higher
number of experts on Turkey.

Little hope was expressed at new life being breathed into the
rapprochement any time soon. First there will be parliamentary
elections in Turkey in 2011 which will be followed by elections
elsewhere in the region. While President Abdullah Gül is still viewed
positively, Recep Tayyip ErdoÄ?an is not. He is seen as becoming
increasing unreliable and racist. Ahmet DavutoÄ?lu’s policy of `zero
problems with neighbors’ is seen as being only partially successful,
with suggestions that Turkey has no idea where it is heading other
than that Turkey is trying to get the best of both worlds and
endeavoring to be the leader of the Muslim world.

The failed rapprochement also unhinged the Karabakh talks. On the one
side, Armenia’s leadership has felt unable to make progress in fear of
being seen as making concessions in order to get the border with
Turkey opened; on the other hand, it now seems that Azerbaijan feels
cheated by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe
(OSCE) Minsk Group, which has resulted in Baku upping its war
rhetoric. In an apparent move to produce some progress in the Karabakh
talks, the OSCE Minsk group co-chairs (Russia, US, France) produced an
updated version of the Madrid Basic Principles in Sochi in January
2010. Azerbaijan accepted this document, Armenia did not.

Azerbaijan has since been insisting that this again shows Armenia’s
lack of interest in a settlement and that the international community
should do more to push Armenia into accepting. This has not happened.
Rather, the co-chairs re-jigged the document and represented it a few
days ago in St. Petersburg. Azerbaijan, not surprisingly, was not
happy. Armenia believes this led Azerbaijan to leave the meeting early
and to the subsequent violation of the cease-fire agreement and tragic
deaths of four Armenian and two Azerbaijani soldiers. They view this
as Azerbaijan displaying its readiness to resort to war to get back
the seven provinces that Armenia continues to occupy in addition to
Nagorno-Karabakh. They also believe that Aliyev has lost control of
his armed forces.

The increase in military clashes has left many believing that
Azerbaijan is planning a `short war’ in light of the forthcoming
Azerbaijani parliamentary elections. Apparently this would boost
President Ilham Aliyev’s popularity. This would be highly risky, not
least because once a war is in the offing it would be very difficult
(if not impossible) to limit it to a couple of days. It would escalate
into a full-fledged bloodbath with catastrophic consequences.

With both sides now having very advanced military technology, it is
possible for Armenia to hit Baku and the nearby Caspian oil fields as
well as quickly destroy pipeline infrastructure (the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan [BTC] pipeline passes just 15 kilometers from the
line of contact) and important Azerbaijani cities, including Ganja. It
would also be easy for Azerbaijan to hit Armenia. Armenia also does
not rule out carrying a pre-emptive strike, which they consider fair
game if they are convinced Azerbaijan is on the verge of launching an
attack. I am skeptical Azerbaijan would do this. Implications for the
region would be massive, including reactions from both Russia and
Iran, not to mention the US. There is no guarantee Baku would win;
their international reputation would be in tatters and it could result
in Aliyev’s fall. As history has shown, all previous Azerbaijani
presidents have been brought down by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Armenia also believes the international community is too soft on
Azerbaijan and continues to contribute to its isolation. One
particular case they cite is the Nabucco gas pipeline, which would cut
out Armenia — as the BTC did before it. They believe that by backing
such projects the EU is simply supporting the isolationist policies of
Azerbaijan and Turkey. However, while Armenia continues to occupy
around 17 percent of its neighbor’s land, it is unthinkable that it
should be allowed to take part in such initiatives.

However, the EU, at the same time, disregards the realities on the
ground, which is very dangerous. The EU should stop limiting itself to
`balanced’ statements and seriously discuss with both countries the
deployment of a peacekeeping/monitoring mission in order to have
first-hand knowledge of what is happening on the ground. Presently,
the tiny OSCE monitoring mission is only allowed to monitor the line
of contact with the agreement of the Azerbaijanis and Armenians and
not on a daily basis. According to the Armenian side, this is
something they would welcome, but Azerbaijan does not. This region is
a time bomb waiting to explode. It is time to take action now before
it is too late.

27.06.2010

From: A. Papazian

Modern ashoughs perform a concert

Aysor, Armenia
June 26 2010

Modern ashoughs perform a concert

Modern ashoughs (bards) will perform a concert in Aram Khachatryan
Concert Hall on July 1. Concert organizer, Sayat-Nova Ashough Song
Ensemble Art Director, singer Tovmas Poghosyan told a press conference
mentioning that the concert is called `Present-day Ashoughs.’

The concert is organized by the Armenian Ministry of Culture and
Sayat-Nova Ashough Song Ensemble. Concert instrumental part director
is Merited Artist of Armenia, composer Artem Khachatur.

`Attending the concert you will see what expectations people have from
the concert, whether the halls are crowded or empty,’ T. Poghosyan
said in response to the question of whether ashough art is of much
demand n society.

T. Poghosyan is convinced that Armenian society needs ashough art,
however, state and cultural policy is needed to organize concerts and
make ashough art more popular in Armenia.

`Jivani was said to be the last Armenian ashough in the 19th century,
Sheram at the beginning of the 20th century, but in the early 20th
century we had three giants ` Havasi, Ashot, Shahen and many other
talented ashoughs, though there were again people thinking that
ashough art passed away and Havasi, Ashot and Shahen are the last
ashoughs,’ T. Poghosyan said speaking of future possibilities of
ashough art development adding:

`Our people knows that there are ashoughs with popular songs today, we
also have ashoughs of young generation ` the future of Armenian
ashough art.’

The singer also noted that, for instance, Jivani Ashough School has 200 pupils.

From: A. Papazian

Cavusoglu to make PACE deputies wear turbans, Armenian MP says

news.am, Armenia
June 27 2010

Cavusoglu to make PACE deputies wear turbans, Armenian MP says

June 26, 2010 | 14:40

If Turkish deputy Mevlut Cavusoglu continues to preside over the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, all the deputies will
come to the sessions in turbans, Gaigik Minasyan, a Republican Party
of Armenia (RPA) member, stated at a press conference.

Speaking of the candidacy of Goran Lindblad, the newly appointed PACE
co-rapporteur on Armenia, Melikyan said he was appointed under the
Turkish-Azerbaijani lobby’s pressure. `Lindblad is an Azerbaijani
lobbyist and it is clear what reports he will make on Armenia. I think
we should ignore and not to work with him. In this case PACE will see
Armenia’s discontent and replace him,’ Melikyan said.

From: A. Papazian

BAKU: Contrast to Armenia, Azerbaijan will not fight with civilians

Trend, Azerbaijan
June 26 2010

Assistant to Azerbaijani President: Contrast to Armenia, Azerbaijan
will not fight with civilians, but only with aggressor’s armed forces
if war is resumed (INTERVIEW)
26.06.2010 19:45
Trend interviewed Defense Issues Assistant to Azerbaijani President,
Lieutenant-General Vahid Aliyev on the Day of the Armed Forces of
Azerbaijan Republic-June 26

Azɒrbaycan, Bakı, June 26 / Trend P.Kesemenski /

Trend: First, I would like to congratulate you on the Day of the Armed
Forces of the Azerbaijan Republic and wish you success in the service.

Aliyev: Thank you.

I would also like to convey my congratulations to officers and
soldiers of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces – first of all the Supreme
Commander and soldiers who are serving in the army in the most
difficult circumstances, and all the Azerbaijani people on the
occasion of this holiday and wish them success in their difficult, but
honorable service, health, happiness and, of course, victory in the
restoration of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

Q.: How do you assess the current state of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces?

A.: Definitely very high.

Today’s armed forces of Azerbaijan are not the same as they were in
the early years of our independence. Then, if you remember, although
the state had presidents, there was no Supreme Commander, because the
armed forces were simply unmanageable. Only after National Leader
Heydar Aliyev’s returning to the power, he was able to establish a
unity of command in the army, the building of the armed forces gained
a scientific form and our troops began to gain the first victory
within six months.

The present Azerbaijani Armed Forces meet the modern requirements of
tactics and strategy of warfare.
This is primarily moral and psychological mood of the armed forces,
its professionalism, and equipment with the most modern types of
military technique, weapons and ammunition.
Azerbaijan has the most combat-capable armed forces in the region and
it can perform all tasks set fore it. This is, first of all, the
liberation of the occupied territories and the restoration of the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan.

Azerbaijan’s military budget increased has increased by 13 times over
the past seven years and now the figure is about 2.2 billion manat,
enabling us to supply our armed forces with the latest technology and
weaponry.

The country established the Defense Industry Ministry, which is
engaged in research and production of weapons and ammunition needed
for our armed forces.

In addition to the Defense Ministry’s Units, the country has a
strongly developed State Border Service, the Interior Ministry’s
Interior Troops and the Emergency Situations Ministry’s Civil Defense
Service that demonstrated their readiness during the natural
disaster-related flooding in lowland areas of the country, which,
fortunately and of course, with their assistance, pass without
casualties.

I would like to note that the current state of our armed forces mostly
is the result of the fact that they are under the constant supervision
of Azerbaijani President, Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, Ilham
Aliyev. President Aliyev cares about the soldiers, their military
training, logistical support and strengthening of their social
protection. Supreme Commander Aliyev’s participation in the most
recent joint large-scale battle exercises of units and formations of
the Defense Ministry, State Frontier Service and Interior Troops,
which essentially was their report – successful report to the
President and the Azerbaijani people for another year of their
progress, once again proved the correctness of the path and methods
that selected to develop our armed forces.

Q.: Azerbaijan is in the war state, as it is evidenced by reports from
the frontline of the Azerbaijani and Armenian troops. Last week is
remembered with the activity on the frontlines and fatalities. What is
the reason for this activity?

A: We have always stated that the combat operations have not been
frozen, the war was not stopped and there is only a ceasefire regime.
The hostilities can resume at any moment. The status quo is not
satisfactory. Why? Because, we have a million refugees and 20 percent
of our territory is under occupation. Because, this greatly hampers
both development of Azerbaijan and development of the entire region.
Because, the State is responsible for its citizens, who are deprived
motherland. Because, Armenia prolongs the current situation
senselessly. Because, the Armenian side follows the ceasefire regime
only in words, but makes provocations frequently and we are obliged to
reply. And every time our responses are adequate, although we are able
to give a more severe reaction.

But we still adhere to the peace negotiations, as the diplomatic
resource has not yet been exhausted. However, this can not last
forever. There were no results for about 20 years because the Armenian
side holds unconstructive position for many years.

If any sensible person was asked how to solve a big problem, he will
reply that a big problem should be divided into smaller problems and
then solved, so that to solve the very big problem. And this is
correct, and it is scientific mode. But what does Armenia answer to
the same question? They offer to solve everything at once. This is at
least funny.

At the same time, they offer to cooperate as it oddly enough for a
reasonable person. Can one cooperate under the gunpoint or more
caliber weapons? Can one lay infrastructure or trade, sow, plow and
drive to relax under fire? The answer is obvious – no. The troops
should be withdrawn at least to cooperate and thereby create an
atmosphere of minimal trust. The problem should be solved step by
step, but not immediately. The Armenian government’s proposals are
originally a deadlock and unacceptable option. Solution to the
conflict is logically reflected in the updated Madrid principles
proposed by the OSCE Minsk Group.
The current situation of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh is like the old
anecdote about the hunter, who caught a bear. Once a hunter caught
the bear and did not have what to do with it … it is impossible to
keep it and terribly to release. The Armenians cannot bear such a
burden, which is the war, economically, psychologically or morally.

Q.: But Armenia claims that Azerbaijan and Turkey have blockaded it?

A.: One may claim anything he wants. What more you are wrong, more you
look for reasons in others.
Those, who listen to this tale, must simply look at a map and see with
a “surprise” that this is Armenia who occupies another country’s
territory and cut itself off all of those communications, which could
pass through Armenia. That is, Armenia has driven itself to the
blockade. It is a paradox – to drive itself to the blockade and even
not involuntarily, but violently, then accuse us that we keep them in
the blockade?

Their appeals to Turkey that they closed the border are at least
disingenuous. For this, being in Turkey one should look at cars with
Armenian numbers at least (which I personally observed), or listen to
the Armenians themselves, who speak about the Turkish trucks carrying
the Turkish goods to Armenia. The fact is that Turkey is only
symbolically closed the border – the Armenians and the Turks cross the
border freely. There is an air communication between Yerevan and
Istanbul, incidentally, opened by Turkey. Where is the embargo?

The current Armenian government cannot recognize that Armenia has
deprived its people of great economic, energy, transport and other
projects with its short-sighted policy and that will very detrimental
to its development. Armenia does not exist de facto as independent
state. The country’s wealth has been distributed for debt and its
moral values are in the hands of the diaspora. The Armenian leadership
has brought itself to a standstill and the situation will be even
worse. Armenia temporarily captured 20 percent of the Azerbaijani
territory, but has lost its future and its progress. The sooner they
will realize that they must return what does not belong them, the
sooner they will get out of the impasse into which they led themselves
and their people, and the faster they will solve their problems.

Q.: Are the Azerbaijani Armed Forces ready to solve every military
tasks set for them in case hostilities are restored?

A.: The Azerbaijani people do not want war, but we must always be
ready for it. This war is forced upon us, and it was imposed by the
Armenian aggressors.

I would like to tell the history of this issue on three main points.

First, today’s Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are historical Azerbaijani
lands. If we take the maps of the last century and earlier, names of
all areas and settlements are of Azerbaijani origin. As a result of
the Russian-Persian and Russian-Turkish wars in the beginning of 19th
century many Armenians, who are not native and indigenous to the
Caucasus, were deported from the Middle East (Eastern Turkey, Syria,
Iran, Iraq) to the current Armenia, which was Irevan Khanate of
Azerbaijan. So, at least half a million people were resided in today’s
Armenia from 1813 until the present day, for 200 years. Moreover, the
Armenians were also settled in Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenians themselves
have erected a monument to the 150th anniversary of the resettlement
of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh, which they themselves have destroyed
not to leave evidence that the Armenians came to this territory. Whom
do they cheat? Of course, themselves.
The Azerbaijan Democratic Republic had an area of 114,000 square
kilometers, but the Bolshevik Russia gave the Zangezur region and part
of the territory of Goycha and Zangibasar regions to the newly
established Armenian state. In this regard, the Nakhchivan Autonomous
Republic was torn away from the total territory of Azerbaijan. In
addition, since the creation of the Soviet Union the Azerbaijani
population has been deported from Western Azerbaijan (today’s Armenia)
for a complete change in the demographic picture in 1918. The mass
deportation of Azerbaijanis ended with apotheosis after an undeclared
war against Azerbaijan in 1988. The Armenians did absolutely ethnic
cleansing, and now no person of Azerbaijani ethnicity lives either in
Armenia or in the occupied territories. The Armenians have created
mono-national state in Armenia. No one except Armenians lives in
Armenia. What is it if it is not an absolute intolerance of all
non-Armenian? There is no other such nationalist regime in the world,
which would lead to such results – the absence of national minorities.

Second, our rightness is supported by the international law. No
country has recognized the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh. No
country justifies the aggression – occupation of Azerbaijani
territory. The U.N. Security Council adopted four resolutions on the
liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh region and the occupied
territories, but Armenia has not yet implemented them. Finally, the
international law provides us proper basis to restore our borders.

Third, it is our moral right to restore the territorial integrity.

That is, the three key aspects – the historical truth, international
and moral right – give us reason to liberate our territory.

The Azerbaijani armed forces will perform all tasks set for them if
the hostilities resume and will inflict a crushing defeat on the
enemy. The Armenian leadership will bring a military defeat to its
people in addition to the casualties, which it already brought to his
people. Let them ponder – do they need it?

There are also other important issues. Many hope that the global
community allegedly will not allow us to fight, etc., but listen, the
world community, if is not silent, then at least does nothing to
address those effects, which we ALREADY faced today, this is complete
ethnic cleansing of civilians and genocide against Azerbaijanis. So,
what can the world community say us? And this is despite the fact
that, unlike Armenia, we are not going to fight with civilians for one
very simple reason – there is simply no civilian population in the
territories under Armenian occupation by Armenians. We will fight only
with the Armenian Armed Forces and we have an absolute right to return
them to whence they came. I am sure that we will be able to find a
common language and will not fight with our citizens of Armenian
nationality until our troops reach current settlements in the
mountainous part of Karabakh, for example, the Khankendi city.

The people and history demands us to return the lands. If the
aggressor is not stopped, then … you see, how the Armenian media
have launched debating the issue of Nakhchivan? Armenians are so much
in the euphoria of their impunity for Karabakh campaign that already
have the appetite to Nakhchivan. But they should know that Nakhchivan
is impregnable fortress. The armed forces in this region are supplied
with everything necessary to give a fitting rebuff in case of
aggression and if desired and the relevant order is given – not only
rebuff.

Q.: Begs the question – why we do not bring back what belongs to us by right?

A.: Because the diplomatic options have not yet exhausted. Everybody
understands what war is. And, moreover – our Supreme Commander,
President – Creator – wants and takes his utmost for the development,
prosperity and progress of Azerbaijan and the entire region. War
implies something more – blood, tears and destruction. This is the
only and only reason not to resume the hostilities on our part and our
principled position is to continue negotiations.

War is a loss from both sides, but we have taken all measures to
minimize fatalities in modern combat. Many of the operations that were
previously performed by personnel are now performed by using modern
technology, which reduces the loss of human life.

I repeat we do not want to perish our youth and see tears in mothers’
eyes. We have seen these in the first war. But the occupation and the
talks cannot go on forever. There is hope that Armenia understands
this and mindless delay in the withdrawal of the Armenian armed forces
from the Nagorno-Karabakh territory will come to an end in the near
future.

Q.: Armenia has its own vision of history, which must be mixed with
so-called “genocide” of Armenians and stories about “Great Armenia”…

A.: What to say to these people who cheat their own population?
Neither today’s Turkey nor the Ottoman had a goal to destroy the
Armenians ethnically just because they were Armenians. Moreover,
Turkey had ministers of the Armenian nationality. Historical truth is
that Armenians lived in the Ottoman Empire nearly 600 years, and no
Armenian suffered there. There are also many Armenians now in Turkey.
Law-abiding citizens will live and prosper. But, the Armenian
population living in eastern Turkey, armed themselves at the expense
of tsarist Russia and France, and took the side of the opponents of
Turkey in the early last century when Turkey was attacked by outside
forces. The Turkish citizens of Armenian nationality formed the
Armenian regular units and fought against Turkey to seize the
country’s eastern part to establish an Armenian state. They did not
achieve anything. They achieved an Armenian state after the Bolshevik
Revolution and the formation of the Soviet Union already in the
Caucasus. The question of “genocide” – is a myth that Armenians want
to impose on the world. The objective of this myth is territorial
claims to Turkey and Azerbaijan.
The second myth is the so-called Greater Armenia. History shows that
the Middle East fixed many wars, but no Armenian state, which would
counter the great generals of those times, was recorded in the
history. This suggests that there was not an Armenian statehood.
Persians, Caucasians, Indians, Arabs and Turks fought there, but
Armenians never fought with anyone. They have always been a part of
this or that state.

Moreover, even assuming that there was a “Greater Armenia”, what
dividends it gives to Armenia? It is time for ideologues Armenians to
understand that it is the 21st century and people should go forward,
not backward. What is “Greater Armenia”? It is difficult to imagine
what would happen if the Turkish, Russian, French, English, Spanish,
Portuguese and other imperial nations remember their history, not only
in the textbooks, but also begin to implement … do not even want to
think, what would happen if the Mongols remember about the time of
Genghis Khan.

Q.: And what about the right of self-determination of nations plaid up by them?

A.: Where have you heard of such a nation, as Karabakhs?

Q.: May they be called a nation?

A: No, it is impossible. There cannot be a notion as the people of
Karabakh, as it cannot be the people of Kurdamir or any other region.
There lived population, and not just Armenians.
And then – how long one can crush people with this right of
self-determination? The Armenian community of Karabakh appeals for
self-determination, those Azerbaijanis, who were living there, in
their turn, asked their self-determination. In this case one can get
self-determination in every square meter of house …

The Armenian people, the Armenian nation has gained
self-determination. It has Armenian state – the Republic of Armenia.
It does not mean that in the entire world, where Armenians live, they
should demand independence or autonomy. We can guarantee absolute
security of those Armenians who want to live in Azerbaijan.

Q: Let’s back to the establishment of the Armed Forces. What steps are
being taken to ensure the army with modern weapons?

A.: First, we have strengthened the air force and air defense forces.
Our air borders are secured by modern combat aircrafts and helicopters
with modern weapons, radars, missiles, which give us absolute air
superiority.

The artillery, armored forces are also equipped in modern state and we
give a special attention to the development of the Navy. The country
updated small arms, trained the ordinary and the officers’ personal,
transited to the NATO training system and replicated the experience
of local wars. All this allows us to say that our armed forces are the
most capable and combat-ready forces in the region. Azerbaijan has all
what is now required to conduct a successful war.

Q.: What work is carried out for the domestic production of military equipment?

A.: Azerbaijan will produce missiles, shells and modern armored
vehicles and upgrade existing ones, as well as produce unmanned aerial
vehicles, small arms and other. The relevant enterprises have already
been opened in Baku and regions. Much has already been done, but the
plans, as well as the desire and capacity to implement them even more.

Q.: How do you see the cooperation with NATO?

A.: Azerbaijan cooperates with NATO within the “Partnership for Peace”
program and participates in peacekeeping operations in the Balkans,
Iraq and now in Afghanistan. That is, Azerbaijan carries out its
obligations.

We also adopted the NATO Individual Plan of Action and Partnership
(IPAP), participate in planning and analysis program (PARP) and of
course participate in all activities of NATO as allies.

Q.: What is your personal attitude to a professional army?

A.: Sooner or later we will come to this. Azerbaijan is obliged to
keep a large number of armed forces, because its territory is
occupied. I think that after the restoration of the territorial
integrity of our country, we will reduce the armed forces and fully
transit to the professional army.

Q.: Are there many in Azerbaijan wishing to study in military schools?
How do you assess the military and the patriotic spirit of soldiers
and young people?

A.: We are glad to say that the competition among the candidates for
entry to the Jamshid Nakhchivanski Lyceum, Heydar Aliyev Lyceum and
higher military educational institutions increases from year to year.
Young people tuned up patriotic, the youth want to serve and men want
to become professional soldiers.

What cannot be said about Armenia. We know that they have big problems
with a call to active military service and with access to higher
military schools, because they realize they fight in unjust war.

The military-patriotic education begins at home and in school. We have
this and the Azerbaijani youth are ready to defend their homeland.
Young people ready to fight and long to a fight. Is this good or bad –
is another matter, but it is the fact that our enemy does not leave us
a choice. The most amazing thing is that they have enough impudence to
accuse us of Armenophobia. You openly occupied territory, committed a
complete ethnic cleansing of civilians and genocide, and today you
brazenly refuse to return them and ask for good relations? Well, you
know … We can only explain that we do not have Armenophobia, we have
an objective response to what the separatist gangs and armed forces of
Armenia did and continue to do.

Q.: The last question is what is your prediction on future development
of the situation in the region?

A.: Can you imagine what would be the present of our region if there
would not be occupation, refugees and our current military expenses?
Not only Azerbaijan and its integral part – Nagorno-Karabakh, but also
Armenia would live now in prosperity, happiness and look at the future
with more optimism. Unfortunately, Armenia deprived of this
opportunity Karabakh and itself at the moment. How long will this
continue? How long are the people of Karabakh and Armenia ready for
suffering it?

We will return our land. Let nobody doubt in this. By any way!

Only when our lands are returned, our citizens of Armenian nationality
will gain freedom, and hope for bright future. We wish this.

We have developed. We are developing and will develop to the benefit
of the Azerbaijani people.

Thanks for the interview, happy holiday!

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijan may unleash new war

news.am, Armenia
June 26 2010

Azerbaijan may unleash new war

June 26, 2010 | 13:34

Below is an interview with Richard Giragosian, Director of the
Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS).

By Artak Yeghiazaryan

Question: At present, what is the basis for negotiations for the
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as the Saint Petersburg
principles are being talked of?

Answer: Azerbaijan’s latest provocation bereft the principles on the
table ` irrespective of whether they are Madrid principles or any
other ones ` of their importance. I think Azerbaijan is less inclined
to diplomacy now. In other words, before the provocation the OSCE
Minsk Group worked at the Madrid Principles, whereas now they are only
trying to keep Azerbaijan at the negotiating table. On the other hand,
even without that attack, the document on the table was not of
importance. The present negotiations remind me of a computer with one
side using Windows 95, the second Windows XP and the third VISTA as
documents on the table. The problem, however, is not the software, but
hardware. No matter what kind of Madrid principles or Windows we can
use, as the problem is in the computer that does not operate for the
following two reasons: first, Karabakh is absent from the computer;
second, Azerbaijan is constantly hitting the computer with a hammer.
Moreover, the computer has been divided into two halves – Armenia and
Azerbaijan ` gradually alienating from each other.

It is not important what is on the table, as the Minsk Group is now
more concerned over the possibility of Azerbaijan’s not continuing the
negotiations. In this situation Armenia must say: `Stop! We want
Azerbaijan to reject a military way before we turn to the documents on
the table.’ Before that, we must shift all the pressure onto
Azerbaijan and exert press the Minsk Group for putting an end to
Azerbaijan’s provocations, as, diplomatically, Armenia’s positions are
stronger now. The only source of threat is Azerbaijan, which means
Armenia can use its diplomatic potential and prevent U.N. or EU
resolutions.

Question: What is your opinion of the international community’s
reaction, particularly of their appeals to both sides, though we are
well aware of which one is the provoker?

Answer: Indeed, the diplomatic reaction to the incident was rather
soft and lukewarm. However, the recent events have shown that the
international community realizes the following fact: Azerbaijan is the
only threat to peace and stability in the region. There is only one
aggressor, sitting on oil barrels in Baku. As to the international
community’s reaction, even their soft-toned diplomatic messages show
Azerbaijan the only culprit. The international community is trying to
use a diplomatic language, but, I can assure you, public appeals and
private messages are quite different.

Question: Russian mass media recently spread information about likely
deployment of Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh and Turkish
ones in Nakhchivan, which was immediately followed by the incident on
the border. Do you see any linkage between these events?

Answer: Definitely there is. Russia wants to take advantage of the
situation. It is for the first time that Russia has wished to deploy
peacekeepers, but it is for the first time disadvantageous both for
Azerbaijan, Armenia and for Karabakh. I am not confident that Russia
will get what it wants. Armenian forces should ensure security of
Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia. The example of Balkan states shows that
foreign peacekeepers fail to maintain peace.

After the statements about peacekeepers’ deployment in
Nagorno-Karabakh and the border incident, Iran’s Ambassador stated
that Tehran will not allow presence of any foreign troops in the
conflict zone, and that the incident is a provocation organized by
external forces. What is your opinion of this?

Iran’s response was in fact related to Azerbaijan and not Karabakh.
The point is Israeli press spread information that Americans and
Israelis are stationing troops in Azerbaijan, that is, taking up
positions against Iran. Naturally, under the present conditions, Iran
is more concerned over major threat that may come from Azerbaijan than
over Karabakh.

Question: Is it possible that Russia instigated the provocation on the border?

Aswer: Yes, it is logical. The provocation might help Russia to pursue
two goals. First, it is a basis for introducing troops into the
conflict zone. Russia’s strength was based on two factors in Abkhazia
and South Ossetia: Russian passports were issued to the local
citizens, and Russian peacekeepers were present there. In Karabakh
Russia has neither, and, by carrying out such a policy, it is likely
to increase its influence. The second objective is as follows: Russia
has intensified its contacts with Azerbaijan for the last two years
and the Azerbaijani attack might be useful for its strategic goals. We
should understand that, in prospect, Armenia must oppose deployment of
any peacekeeping mission in the region, including Russian and NATO
ones.

Question: Azerbaijan already discusses how many days it will take them
to occupy Karabakh. How realistic is such a prospect?

Answer: From the military point of view it is quite dangerous for
Azerbaijan to think in this direction, as the losses Azerbaijan will
incur in a war will be very great. However, Azerbaijan is not rational
and there is a danger Aliyev will launch a war without hesitation,
following Saakashvili’s example. Azerbaijan may begin battle, but not
a war, though I fear a battle may result in a war and the situation
will go beyond control. One thing is for sure, this summer will be
more complicated and precarious.

Question: What response will the international community give to
Azerbaijan’s blackmail? Will it surrender to intimidation and make
concessions or toughen its position on Azerbaijan?

Answer: Everybody understands the Azerbaijani threats are empty and if
it starts a war, it will be defeated. After constant threats over the
years Azerbaijan is trying to show these threats are not empty, but
this country, being a dangerous one, is acting idiotically, as
launching a war will be tantamount to a suicide for it. Azerbaijan
tells the whole world: `We are children, if you do not give us
candies, we will become naughty and start fighting.’ The
international community will show varied responses to this. Some
countries, particularly those who depend on oil, would like to give
Azerbaijan this candy, as this child is sitting on the pipeline.
Others will say, `Who is this idiot?’ Azerbaijan will lose respect for
itself, will have failures in diplomacy and place Armenia in a more
advantageous position. One more remark: I was surprised Azerbaijan
chose this time for such a provocation. I mean it was organized in
advance of the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit to the
region. Usually, when somebody is waiting for guests, he dresses
beautifully, shaves and tidies the house, whereas Aliyev, figuratively
speaking, stripped off his clothes, threw on the floor and peed on
them.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian policemen to get training in Russian higher schools

news.am, Armenia
June 26 2010

Armenian policemen to get training in Russian higher schools

June 26, 2010 | 18:19

Armenian policemen will get education in the universities of the
Russian Interior Ministry, RF Interior Minister Rashid Nurgaliyev said
on Saturday after a meeting of Russian and Armenian Interior Ministry
officials in Yerevan.

Nurgaliyev stated that they discussed personnel policy and are closely
cooperating in this field.

According to him, over 20 Armenian policemen have got training in
Russian institutes over recent months, adding that they are ready to
receive their colleagues from Armenia.

From: A. Papazian