10% Of X-Ray Machines In Armenia Pose Risk For Doctors And Patients

10% OF X-RAY MACHINES IN ARMENIA POSE RISK FOR DOCTORS AND PATIENTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 29, 2010 – 16:14 AMT 11:14 GMT

There are about 200 X-ray machines operating in Armenia. All of
them are radiation sources, with some machines posing risk both for
radiologist doctors and patients, the head of State Committee for
Nuclear Security, Ashot Martirosyan stated.

As he noted at July 29 news conference, 10% of X-ray machines in
Armenia are outdated and in need of replacement. “A list of medical
centers using outdated equipment was complied, with X-ray units soon
to be replaced,” Ashot Martisoryan pointed out.

From: A. Papazian

Yerevan Bids Farewell To Deceased Academician Emil Gabrielyan

YEREVAN BIDS FAREWELL TO DECEASED ACADEMICIAN EMIL GABRIELYAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 29, 2010 – 16:40 AMT 11:40 GMT

RA National Academy of Sciences bid farewell to RA NAS academician,
director of RA Healthcare Ministry’s Scientific Center for Drug and
Technology Expertise Emil Gabrielyan who died July 20 in U.S. Emil
Gabrielyan’s ashes were buried in Municipal Pantheon.

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan and Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan
expressed commiseration to the family of deceased academician.

From: A. Papazian

AMD 79mln To Be Allocated For Renovation Of RA National Archive

AMD 79MLN TO BE ALLOCATED FOR RENOVATION OF RA NATIONAL ARCHIVE

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 29, 2010 – 17:00 AMT 12:00 GMT

The Armenian government allocated AMD 79mln to the Ministry of
Territorial Administration for renovation of the RA National Archive.

Currently, the archive’s system of ventilation is out of service.

Moreover, 790,000 cases were sent to the National Archive for permanent
storage in 1991-2009, as a result of which the archive is overloaded,
and there is a necessity to construct Á new premise for it.

Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan noted that due to this decision
Armenia will not face problems with document archiving for ten years.

From: A. Papazian

Disability Rights Defense Organizations In Armenia, Georgia, Iran To

DISABILITY RIGHTS DEFENSE ORGANIZATIONS IN ARMENIA, GEORGIA, IRAN TO LAUNCH COOPERATION

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 29, 2010 – 15:05 AMT 10:05 GMT

Iranian Embassy in Armenia jointly with Unison NGO has announced a
contest of disability issue-related compositions, essays and articles.

The contest aims at increase of the disabled awareness, with results to
be summed up on December 3 the International Day of Disabled Persons.

Any Armenian citizen regardless of age and profession can apply for
participation. Application deadline is November 15.

As the head of Unison NGO Armen Alaverdyan stated at July 29 news
conference, a new project, sponsored by Norwegian government will soon
be launched. The project aims at experience exchange and cooperation
strengthening between disability rights defense organizations in
Armenia, Georgia and Iran.

From: A. Papazian

Sardarapat Movement Sets Up Summer Camp For Youth In Liberated Artsa

SARDARAPAT MOVEMENT SETS UP SUMMER CAMP FOR YOUTH IN LIBERATED ARTSAKH TERRITORIES

PanARMENIAN.Net
July 29, 2010 – 17:44 AMT 12:44 GMT

On July 20-25, Sardarapat movement jointly with Avandutyun NGO set
up a summer camp in liberated Artsakh territories, hosting youth from
Armenia, NKR and foreign countries.

Young guests were taken on walking tours to liberated lands.

Excursions to We and Our Mountains memorial and Shushi were organized.

The event aimed at physical and intellectual training, as well as
winner psychology formation.

Another event was scheduled for the year 2011, Sardarapat movement
press service reported.

From: A. Papazian

Government Of Armenia Approved The Development Program Of Seed-Growi

GOVERNMENT OF ARMENIA APPROVED THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OF SEED-GROWING AND PRODUCTION OF WHEAT SEEDS TILL 2014

/ARKA/
July 29, 2010
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, July 29. /ARKA/. On Thursday, Government of Armenia approved
the development program of seed-growing and production of wheat seeds
for 2010-2014. Armenian Minister of Agriculture Gerasim Alaverdyan said
that according to Armenian National Statistic Service, in 2004-2008
the level of self-sufficiency of wheat in Armenia was in average
37%. According to world standards, the level of self-sufficiency
should be 75%.

“Armenia uses 650-720 thousand tons of wheat annually, of which
thousand tons is wheat of Armenian production. In 2008 Armenia produced
254 thousand tons and in 2009 – 225 thousand tons”, he said.

The government program is targeted at the increase of the level of
Armenian wheat and level of self-sufficiency from current 37% to 55%
till 2014.

The program will allow to have wheat territories up to 115-120 thousand
ha and the harvest of wheat – up to 400 thousand tons. The territory
of wheat was reduced from 127 thousand in 2005 to 82.7 thousand ha
in 2009 due to the use of unqualified wheat.

Government of Armenia has already allocated 558 million drams (about
1.5 million dollars) for buying high quality seeds of wheat from
Stavropol. The government bought 950 tons of wheat; another 500 tons
will be bought in Armenia. 1450 tons of high quality wheat will be
distributed to Armenian farms free-of-charge in the first phase of
the program.

After gathering the harvest, the farms should return wheat to the
State two times more than they received.

The program envisages gradual decrease of imported wheat and increase
of volumes of own production.

Prime minister of Armenia Tigran Sargsyan said that the program
will be implemented on the basis of cooperation of the State and
private sector.

For the implementation of the program the given sphere should be
studied for the development of seed-growing and wheat production.

From: A. Papazian

Baku envoy nominee faces bruising confirmation fight

July 30, 2010
Baku envoy nominee faces bruising confirmation fight

In a city riven with nasty confirmation battles, among the nastiest
involves the appointment of Matthew Bryza to be U.S. ambassador to
Azerbaijan.

While there were early signs that Bryza’s nomination would be
contentious, the Obama administration proceeded with it anyway, perhaps
recognizing that opposition to Bryza did not fall along the usual
partisan lines, as Bryza’s diplomatic star rose under the Bush
administration. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was also said by
Foggy Bottom sources to support Bryza for the envoy job.

Something of a preemptive campaign began against Bryza last summer,
months before Obama announced his nomination in May. The gist of the
critique back then was that Bryza, a foreign service officer who rose to
become Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs, had been seen as too close to Georgian president Mikheil
Saakashvili in the run up to Russia’s invasion of Georgia in August
2008.

“The indictment of Bryza is that in all of their meetings [and] dinners,
. [Bryza] did not make [Georgian president] Misha [Saakashvili]
understand the single most important point about U.S. policy toward
Georgia — if you try to invade Abkhazia or South Ossetia, and Russia
responds, we will not support you,” one American Caucasus expert who
asked to speak anonymously says.

Bryza supporters vigorously dispute the charge. “Matt was close to
Saakashvili, but that made it all the stronger when he warned
Saakashvili against responding to Russian provocations,” a senior U.S.
official who asked to speak anonymously told POLITICO. “Saakashvili did
not heed this advice, or Rice’s, or that of others . but that is his
responsibility.” Bryza, in the midst of the confirmation process,
declined to comment.

Now some Washington interests critical of the Azeri regime as well as
the influential Armenian American lobby group, the Armenian National
Committee of America (ANCA) are working to sink the nomination. ANCA has
raised questions about whether there is a conflict of interest posed by
the work of Bryza’s Turkish-born wife Zeyno Baran at the Hudson
Institute. It has suggested that her research at the Hudson Institute
may have been funded by Turkish, Azeri and Caspian energy interest
contributions to the think tank that would raise questions about Bryza’s
ability to deliver tough messages to Baku and about his independence in
various high-intensity disputes. Among them are the Armenian-Azeri
dispute over Nagorno Karabakh and the bitter, long-running feud between
Turkey and Armenia.

Baran, who has done research supportive of Caspian energy projects such
as the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline that is also supported by the U.S.
government, directed the Nixon Center’s International Security and
Energy programs from 2003 to 2006, then served as a senior fellow at the
Hudson Institute from 2006 to 2009. Since July 2009, she has taken no
salary from the think tank, and is currently on maternity leave.

While Hudson has not publicly disclosed its funding sources, its CEO
says Baran’s work has not been funded by the Turkish or Azeri
governments.

“This issue is frankly a red herring,” Hudson Institute CEO Kenneth
Weinstein told POLITICO in a statement Friday. “Zeyno Baran’s work has
never been funded by official Turkish or Azeri sources. We received
funding from the Azerbaijan-Turkey Business Association for a 2007
conference on US-Azerbaijan-Turkish economic, political, energy, and
trade issues, but Hudson Institute’s costs exceeded expenses.”

U.S. officials who have worked with Bryza also strongly dispute any
conflict of charges leveled against Bryza and his wife. “Matt’s record
of straight, strong talk with the Azeris is unquestioned by those who
worked with him for years and witnessed him in action,” the senior U.S.
official said. “Suggestions to the contrary reflect ignorance, willful
distortion or, as in the attacks on his wife, bigotry.

“Matt is the best candidate for a tough job: he knows the region and the
issues, and likes the people, but he is also a keen-eyed observer of
their vices as well as their virtues and relentless in his pursuit of
American interests,” the official said.

ANCA has also expressed concern about the fact that the Azeri foreign
minister served as one of Bryza’s witnesses at his 2007 wedding in
Turkey to Baran. But the wedding write up that appeared in Turkey’s
Zaman newspaper indicated that senior Armenian officials were also
invited, but did not attend.

It’s no surprise, however, that the Armenian President, defense minister
and foreign minister sent their regrets, along with telegrams and a
floral wreath, one observer noted, since showing up in Istanbul would
have really made headlines, given that Armenia and Turkey do not have
diplomatic ties. And the Armenian Patriarch in Turkey His Beatitude
Armenian Patriarch Mesrob did attend, as did several Armenian NGO
leaders. Despite that, and several positive testimonials about Bryza
from Armenian and Armenian American figures, ANCA formally issued an
action alert this week asking its members to call their Senators to
oppose the nomination.

“I think our general sense is that American diplomacy in the Caucasus
and Azerbaijan would be well served by a fresh start with a new
ambassador who doesn’t have deep ties into the Azerbaijani government or
serious conflict of interest issues with financial interest and energy
interests in the region,” Aram Hamparian, executive director of ANCA,
told POLITICO Thursday. “Matt is a good diplomat,” Hamparian added, “but
not for the Caucasus.”

Bryza told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at his nomination
hearing last week that he and Baran had made a conscious decision to
separate their personal and professional lives ten years ago in order to
avoid the appearance of any such conflicts.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) wrote the State Department
Wednesday asking the nominee to answer concerns similar to those raised
by ANCA.

Baran “has done no work on the South Caucasus since January 2009, has
received no salary since July 2009 and has been on leave without pay;
and Baran’s program at Hudson will shut down at the end of this month,
as had long been the plan, with Baran now on maternity leave,” states
the State Department’s response to be submitted to the Senate.

Meanwhile, one Washington-based lobbyist and consultant who works on the
Caucasus who declined to speak on the record is floating another set of
claims against the nominee. One focuses on an August, 1997 car accident
involving Bryza when he was serving as a diplomat in Moscow. A woman was
hit and received serious head injuries in the accident and news reports
at the time said the United States expressed regret for the accident,
after which Bryza transferred out of Russia.

A U.S. official says all documentation on the case was shared with the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee legal counsel, including a statement
from the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs that Bryza would not be
charged with a crime and was free to return to Russia.

Some U.S. officials suggest some of the claims being floated against
Bryza may be motivated by other regional powers’ desire to avoid strong
U.S.-Azeri ties. They suspect that the motivation of some of the
critiques are not specific to Bryza himself but intended to basically
delay getting a U.S. ambassador to Baku at all and by extension, to
diminish U.S.-Azeri relations.

The U.S. has not had an ambassador in Azerbaijan since last July.

“Plenty of folks from a certain pro-Russian bent seem increasingly
desperate to prevent the improvement U.S.-Azerbaijan relations,” one
observer said.

On Friday, Bryza’s name was added to a list of two dozen ambassador
nominees the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is set to vote on at a
business meeting next week before breaking for August recess.

From: A. Papazian

Historical perception of Caucasians’ cold winds of change in Caucasu

Historical perception of Caucasians’ cold winds of change in Caucasus
By LISA KAAKI, [email protected]

Published: Jul 28, 2010

In `Let Our Fame Be Great,’ Oliver Bullough takes us to
the Caucasus Mountains which run from the Crimea to the Caspian Sea and
form Russia’s southern border. This area is known to us because
of the war in Chechnya and the armed confrontation between Georgia and
Russia over South Ossetia. The author lived in Russia for seven years
until 2006. He was a journalist, first for local magazines and
newspapers and then for Reuter’s news agency; he reported
throughout Russia, Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan but preferred working
with the people from the Caucasus and he tells the stories of this land,
a region of great ethnic diversity, with dozens of native languages and
dialects. Many of the events he describes are revealed for the first
time because the struggle of the Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus has
been mostly forgotten for 200 years.

Russia’s struggle to conquer the Caucasus began in 1783 when it
defeated the steppe nomads, the Nogai, the last remaining descendants of
Genghis Khan in Europe. The Russian General Alexander Suvorov had
assembled the Turkic-speaking nomads at the Yeya Fortress. Once, they
had sworn allegiance to Empress Catherine, they were ordered to gather
up their belongings, and resettle on the plains, south of the Urals.
Some rebelled but the disciplined Russian soldiers were ready and in the
words of the 19th century historian, Vasily Potto: `The Tatars
were pushed into the marshy river and, seeing no salvation, in a fit of
helpless anger, destroyed their own treasures, slaughtered their wives
and drowned their infants,’ and Suvorov recovered 300,000
horses, 40,000 head of cattle as well as 200,000 sheep.

The Nogais who had not attended the meeting, agreed to avenge the
massacre but they were met with a staunch resistance. Relentlessly,
chased across the steppe, `the Russians left the valley choked
with their dead. By destroying the Nogais and winning the steppes, they
had opened the door to the Caucasus mountains, and, after the Caucasus
mountains, to the lands of Georgia and Armenia, and to Turkey and Persia
too. Russia had discovered its destiny, and the Caucasus peoples were
standing in its way. For them life would never be the same
again,’ writes Oliver Bullough.

Few nations knew about the destruction of the Nogai nation; the British
were beginning their industrial revolution and both the Americans and
the French were establishing democratic rule. The Russians had a green
light to fight all the southern tribes and nothing was going to stop
them.

The annihilation of the Nogais was followed by the Circassia, genocide,
when as many as 300,000 Circassians died from hunger, violence, drowning
and disease when Russia expelled them from their lands in 1864, the year
they were defeated. Over a quarter of a million Circassians left Russia
during that time. It is estimated that between a million and 1.2 million
Circassians fled before or after 1864 and live now in Turkey, Israel,
Jordan and elsewhere in the Middle East.

Circassians are known for their code of conduct, `habze’
based on respect, obedience and loyalty. According to the author, this
loyalty to their new homes had been a characteristic of the Circassians
ever since the tragedy of 1864. They earned a reputation as tough
soldiers for the simple reason that Circassian loyalty does not know
borders. They fought for the Ottoman Turks until their state collapsed
after the First World War. They even fought for the Turkish Republic
against the Greeks, although their leader, Ethem, was never given
thanks. In return for his loyalty, he was sent away by Ataturk who
accused him of being a traitor. Circassians went on to serve their new
rulers in Jordan, Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. Nowadays, however, the
Circassians are no longer the fighters they once were, and few among the
young generation are likely to enter a military academy.

Not all Circassians left their homeland, a tenth of them accepted
Russia’s conditions that they abandon their resistance. Murat
Berzegov, one of their descendants, headed an organization known as the
`Circassian Congress’ aiming for Russia to recognize the
destruction of his nation as genocide: `People say I am too
tough, they say we should just get on with developing music and
language, but that would be to neutralize our organization… What
is the point of developing language anyway if we don’t have a
future of some kind? If there is no future then why bother?’ He
says, adding that young Circassians were connecting with each other, and
young Circassians realized what had happened to their nation and why
they were spread all over the world. Despite, Berzegov’s
efforts, Circassians are still fighting for justice and their appeals
are passed by in silence.

After the Circassians were defeated and wiped out, their fellow Muslims
the Karachais were allowed to continue their lives as animal herders for
the rest of the nineteenth century. Under Stalin’s ruthless
rule, their half-hearted support for the communist regime was deemed
unacceptable. During World War II, the Soviet authorities found the
perfect excuse to get rid of the Karachai nation.

In 1943, a secret decree stated that the Karachais behaved traitorously
and collaborated with the Germans. On Oct. 12, and 14, 1943, the
government officially abolished the Karachai Autonomous Oblast. A total
of 69,267 people were deported: The Karachai nation was the first of
four North Caucasus nations that were deprived of their lands and
deported onto the steppes of Central Asia.

The next people in line were the Balkars, Turkic herders living in the
highest mountains of the Caucasus. Forces from the Soviet secret police,
NKVD which would later be renamed the KGB, sent a report in 1943 stating
that the Balkars had collaborated with the German army and suggested the
possibility of deporting them. The Balkars were effectively removed from
their homes between December 1943 and May 1944; they were sent off to
villages and towns in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan where temperatures would
reach minus forty degrees and food was scarce. Azret Khadzhiev, a Balkar
born in 1934 remembers sixty years later, that he was staying with
family friends on the night of the deportation, he was sent off to
Kazakhstan without his parents. He lived with distant relatives but when
they could no longer feed him, he had to go to an orphanage full of
children lost in the deportations. `I was there for all that
winter and people died everywhere. The collective farm fed us but when
the wind was blowing and it was cold they could not reach us and
that’s when we would go hungry. People died but God helped, and
I survived. The second winter I was lucky and was taken in by distant
relatives in a different region’ he says.

According to official documents, 38,000 Balkars and 68,000 Karachais
were resettled. According to the author, in April 1949, the population
of Karachais was 57,491 and the Balkars were 31,873: A decline of 15
percent and 16 percent: `The scattered populations were in
danger of disappearing altogether, while the restrictions on movement
and work stopped them finding each other and re-establishing family or
neighborly groups.

The most brutal war Caucasia had ever seen happened in the 1990s in
Chechnya. The Chechens had been accused of taking the opportunity to
gain their independence during the Second World War. On the Feb. 23,
1944, the official celebration day for the Red Army, the Chechens were
taken by train and dumped in the steppes of Kazakhstan. They were left
alone to fend for themselves and with nothing to eat save a herb,
`orach’. They eventually made their way to the city of
Almaty which they helped build into the capital and financial centre of
Kazakhstan. A great majority eventually returned to Chechnya after the
death of Stalin in 1953. The actual rebirth of a Chechen National
movement started in 1988 with the foundation of a movement known as
`Kavkaz’ which means `Caucasus’ in
Russian. A year later, Doku Zavgayev was the first ethnic Chechen to
head their government since their exile. Under the pressure of the young
nationalists, the local government proclaimed its sovereignty within the
Soviet Union in November 1900. The same year, a national congress was
set up, and the most high-ranking Chechen in the Soviet air force, Major
general Dzokhar Dudayev was invited to speak. In his speech he made it
clear that he wanted Chechnya to gain its independence, and he was
clearly prepared to fight for that.

In August 1991, a group of hardliners criticized violently the reforming
leadership. When Boris Yeltsin defeated the conservatives, the Chechens
took it as an opportunity: they elected Dudayev who wasted no time to
declare Chechnya’s independence on Nov. 2, 1991. The
Chechen’s defiant resolve ended in a gruesome war which began
when in 1994 the Russians assaulted Grozny in the most brutal way. The
Chechens’ fought bravely a terrible war and the Russians
eventually pulled out in 1996.

The region then sank into complete chaos culminating in the murder of
six foreign aid workers during their sleep. After this worst deliberate
attack in the history of the Red Cross, most foreign charity workers
left Chechnya after December 1996. Faced with no work and no alternative
sources of income, many Chechen joined Basayev’s
extremists’. According to the author, `he would be
uniquely responsible both for prolonging the Chechen’s ability
to resist the invading Russian forces, and for blackening his
nation’s name in the eyes of the world. He himself admitted that
he was a terrorist. Thanks to him, his whole nation was to be known as
terrorists.’

A number of horrific apartment bombings in Moscow, in Volgodonsk and in
the Dagestani town of Buynaksk, produced more than 300 casualties and
caused the Russian troops to return to Chechnya. This violent onslaught
ended with the death of 25,000 Chechens while about 200,000 fled into
exile, almost 20 percent of the Chechen population. Unlike during the
1994-1996 war, Chechens did not unite to fight the enemy, they were
split into various factions headed by Maskhadov, Kadyrov, Basayev and
Khattab.

`It was a heavy price to pay for this handful of men’s
failure to reach an agreement. And they are all to blame for
that’ says Oliver Bullough.

Chechens are still choosing to leave on their own accord. They have
little to look for in a country with a lack of education, an economy in
shambles, a land littered with mines and the risk of still being
arrested. In 2008, Chechens were the third largest group seeking refuge
behind Iraqis and Somalis. They head mainly for Austria, Poland and
France and establish discreet communities. If the Chechens refuse to
unite under the command of their exiled politicians, the Russian
government refuses to compromise on the Chechens’ dream of
independence and this has resulted in a wave of political killings which
show no sign of abating.

`Let Our Fame Be Great’ uncovers the little known
history of the Caucasian Muslims and their continuous struggle for
independence. The narrative moves backwards and forwards, highlighting
the complexity of the region. Many of the events in the book have been
described for the first time. Rich with anecdotes, personal memories,
and a thorough research, Oliver Bullough brings to life the captivating
history of people who have almost been completely forgotten. The
Russians have obliterated in their minds all facts pertaining to their
Caucasian wars but the Circassians, the mountain Turks, the Ingush, the
Chechens and the others will never forget. And this book will help the
rest of the world to remember the `defiant people of the
Caucasus.’

© 2010 Arab News

From: A. Papazian

ANCA: Kerry Schedules Bryza Confirmation Vote Despite…

Armenian National Committee of America
1711 N Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Tel. (202) 775-1918
Fax. (202) 775-5648
[email protected]
Internet

PRESS RELEASE

July 30, 2010
Contact: Elizabeth S. Chouldjian
Tel: (202) 775-1918

KERRY SCHEDULES BRYZA CONFIRMATION VOTE
DESPITE INCOMPLETE AND EVASIVE ANSWERS

— Bryza Responds to Written Questions Submitted by Senate
Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Foreign Relations Committee
Chairman John Kerry, and Senators Barbara Boxer, Robert Menendez,
and Russ Feingold

WASHINGTON, DC – Senator John Kerry (D-MA), Chairman of the
Foreign Relations Committee, today announced that his panel will
hold a vote next Tuesday, August 3rd, on the confirmation of
Matthew Bryza, President Obama’s controversial nominee to serve
U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan, despite the nominee’s evasive and
incomplete answers to a series of written questions submitted to
him by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and key members of
this influential panel, reported the Armenian National Committee of
America (ANCA).

“Mr. Bryza’s evasive, unresponsive, and incomplete written answers
to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, even more than his
spoken testimony before this panel, confirm our reservations about
his troubling track record, and clearly confirm that he is not the
right person to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan,” said Aram
Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA. “American diplomacy in
the region would be well served by a fresh start, with a new
ambassador who doesn’t have deep ties into Azerbaijan’s corrupt
government, a history of turning a blind-eye to Baku’s aggression,
or serious conflict of interest issues.”

“We want to thank Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and offer our
sincere appreciation to Senators Boxer and Menendez and all the
those who have worked hard to ensure that we send an ambassador to
Baku who can effectively represent U.S. interests, persuasively
advance American values, and – crucially, for the cause of peace –
constrain an increasingly belligerent Aliyev regime from acting on
its threats of renewed war,” added Hamparian.

Bryza’s July 22nd confirmation hearing before the Foreign Relations
Committee raised more questions than answered on a range of issues,
prompting Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Robert Menendez (D-NJ),
Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Chairman Kerry to submit written questions
to the nominee and, significantly, prompted a detailed letter of
inquiry to the State Department directly from Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid.

Azerbaijani Aggression:

During Bryza’s July 22nd committee appearance, he confirmed, for
the first time by an Administration official, the widely reported
news that Azerbaijan had, in fact, initiated the June 18, 2010
incident on the Nagorno Karabagh frontier that led to the death of
four Nagorno Karabagh and one Azerbaijani soldier. In response to
a question from Senator Boxer, he acknowledged Azerbaijan sparked
the conflict, but then sought to deflect responsibility onto
Nagorno Karabagh forces, which he mistakenly described as
“Armenia[n],” stating: “There was an Azerbaijani movement across
the line of contact, Armenia responded, resulting in deaths.” In
response to Senator Boxer’s follow-up written question asking “Why
hasn’t the U.S. government been more forceful in its condemnation
of Azerbaijan,” Bryza retreated from his cautious spoken remarks,
saying only that: “the full details of what occurred on June 18 are
not known.”

In response to a separate written question by Senator Boxer as to
whether Azerbaijan’s June 18th attack against Nagorno Karabagh
represented a violation of Section 907 of the FREEDOM Support Act,
which restricts U.S. aid to Azerbaijan unless it takes demonstrable
steps to cease offensive uses of force against Armenia and Nagorno
Karabakh, Bryza repeated: “The full details of what occurred on
June 18 are not known,” and then went on to defend the
Administration’s waiver of Section 907 and to generally praise
Azerbaijan as a “important security partner” to the United States.

Azerbaijan’s Desecration of the Djulfa Cemetery

In response to written inquiries about Bryza’s prolonged silence in
the wake of Azerbaijan’s December 2005 demolition of the Armenian
cemetery in Djulfa, Bryza argued that he had made private comments
on this matter to Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammedyarov,
but could not point to any public remarks until March of the
following year, when he was confronted with questions on this
subject by journalists at a Yerevan press conference. In the
nearly three month period of Bryza’s silence on Djulfa, this issue
was covered in the international media and publicly condemned by
U.S. Members of Congress, international NGOs, and the full European
Parliament.

Conflict of Interest:

In response to concerns by Sen. Menendez regarding conflict of
interest issues that arose regarding Bryza’s wife, Zeyno Baran, and
her professional work at the Hudson Institute advocating on U.S.
policy toward Azerbaijan and the Caspian region, Bryza argued that,
since January 2009, Baran had “shifted the focus of her work” from
the South Caucasus to “Islam, democracy and extremism in Europe and
the United States.” (A Google search reveals numerous instances of
public commentary by Baran regarding the South Caucasus since
2009.)

The source of the funding for Baran’s Center for Eurasia Policy
program at the Hudson Institute remains unclear. The Hudson
Institute has, as of today, refused to respond to a June 3, 2010
written request from the ANCA that it publicly share its sources of
funding from Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Fast-tracking of Nomination

An editorial published today in The Armenian Weekly voiced the
Armenian American community’s frustration with the Senator Kerry’s
fast-tracking of the Bryza nomination. “All citizens and Senators
deserve a chance to meaningfully participate in the important
Constitutional process of ambassadorial confirmations, especially
when vital life-and-death issues are at stake, as they are in
Nagorno Karabagh,” noted the Weekly. “As Chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee and a Senator representing America’s
oldest and one of its largest Armenian American communities, John
Kerry should put the brakes on the Bryza nomination.”

The full text of The Armenian Weekly editorial can be found at:

kerry/

Armenian Americans have been contacting their Senators to oppose
the Bryza nomination through an ANCA action alert:

Links to Sen. Reid’s letter, and Responses to Questions submitted
by Senators Boxer and Menendez are posted on the ANCA website –

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenianweekly.com/2010/07/30/whats-the-rush-senator-
http://www.capwiz.com/anca/callalert/index.tt?alertid=15249851
www.anca.org
www.anca.org

Supplies Of Russian Gas To Armenia Slash By 20 Percent In First Half

SUPPLIES OF RUSSIAN GAS TO ARMENIA SLASH BY 20 PERCENT IN FIRST HALF

/ARKA/
July 29, 2010
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, July 29, /ARKA/. Supplies of Russian gas to Armenia in the
first half of 2010 slashed by 19.7% year-on-year to 739.3 million
cubic meters, ArmRosGazprom (ARG), the Russian-dominated national
gas distribution company of Armenia, said in a statement posted on
its official website.

According to it, 749.5 million cubic meters of gas were sold by the
company to households and corporate consumers in Jan.-June, by 13.6%
less if compared to the same time span last year.

“The additional consumed gas was from the company’s storage
facilities,’ it said.

Household consumption decreased by 16.8% year-on-year to 286.8 million
cubic meters. Power generating companies’ consumption shrank by 34.5%
to 102.1 million cubic meters.

Industrial sector consumption rose slightly by 5.7% to 123.4 million
cubic meters.

Consumption by other consumers, mainly by liquefied gas filling
stations, dropped by 0.4% to 141.8 million cubic meters.

ARG has a monopoly over the distribution of natural gas in Armenia
which is mainly imported from Russia via Georgia.

The Armenian government owns 20% of ARG, and the remaining 80% is
owned by Russia’s Gazprom.

From: A. Papazian