Modest Holy Cross Mass Attracts Few

MODEST HOLY CROSS MASS ATTRACTS FEW

Asbarez
Monday, September 20th, 2010
AKHTAMAR

With no cross atop its dome, no belfry or tolling bells and a makeshift
altar, the much-touted and controversial Mass took place Sunday at
Holy Cross Church, officiated by the Istanbul Patriarchate’s Archbishop
Aram Ateshyan.

Thousands of Armenians who had planned a pilgrimage stayed away from
the scheduled Mass after Turkish officials refused to place a cross
atop the dome and the general sentiment that the Mass was a propaganda
ploy by the Turkish government.

The Holy See of Etchmiadzin and the Great House of Cilicia boycotted
the event, the latter citing the blatant political charade by the
Turkish government and the former citing the absence of the cross in
a reversal of an earlier decision to send a delegation.

With bell chimes broadcast through a loud speaker, several hundred
parishioners and Turkish government officials gathered at Holy Cross
for what was originally seen as a historic Mass in a historic church.

Most of the parishioners attending the Mass were Armenians from
Istanbul, according to Turkish media reports.

No high-level Turkish government officials attended the ceremony and
the church, which was deemed too small, was filled with local officials
and guests, while most parishioners gathered outside the church to
witness the Mass, which was the first held at that church in 95 years.

“Turkey failed to reach its objective because of its missteps
in recent times,” said Giro Manoyan the political director of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation.

Manoyan pointed to recent Western media reports and cited CNN and
BBC reports, which clearly stated that Turkey intentionally avoided
opening Holy Cross as a church since in fears that Armenians would
lay claims on lands and territory.

He urged the Armenian church leaders in Turkey to press for more
religious ceremonies at Akhtamar, because, as Manoyan explained,
by granting permission for Sunday’s Mass, the Turkish government
claimed the Holy Cross church as its property.

Manoyan also called on Armenian authorities to clarify to the
international community that the Turkish government’s “permission”
for the Mass was done more as a gensture-appeasement-to its national
minorities than it was a concession to Armenia.

From: A. Papazian

Azerbaijan Republic Was Born In September 1918

AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC WAS BORN IN SEPTEMBER 1918
By Levon MELIK-SHAHNAZARYAN

Times.am
20 September, 2010, 6:39 pm

The proclamation of Azerbaijan Republic took place in late May, 1918
in Tbilisi. Indeed, this phrase is conditional, since no one neither
seen nor read declaration of Azerbaijan Republic Proclamation. By the
way, this fact let to change the day of Azerbaijan proclamation from
May 27 on May 28, 1918. Hard to say what caused this “rejuvenation”
of Azerbaijan Republic: however, until recently, the official date of
Azerbaijan Republic’s proclamation was considered May 27. Probably,
it’s due to the concealment of the declaration, where the new-born
republic was called the East-Caucasian Muslim Republic (VZMR)
(according to other sources – Azerbaijan Muslim Republic).

Both of the options indicate the desire of Transcaucasian Turks and
Turkey to establish in Caucasus – first time in history! – state
only for the Transcaucasian Turks, since word “Muslim” in the South
Caucasus has been converted for a long time into denominational
ethnonym. All other nations of the region had their traditional
time-honored ethnonyms: Armenians, Talyshs, Avars, Tats, Lezgins,
Udis etc. Although a lot of them confessed Islam, the “ethnonym”
“Muslim” was privatized by nomad Turkish tribes.

Meanwhile, in the name of Azerbaijan Muslim Republic (later –
the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic) on the territories, having no
relations to the historical (true) Azerbaijan, clearly reflected
desire “to justify” future territorial claims to Persia (Iran) its
Northern provinces from the immemorial time called Azerbaijan. Thus,
the proclamation itself became a threat and a warning for the nations
of Eastern Caucasus and Iran of the impending aggression against them.

Well, the proclamation of Azerbaijan Republic itself same as
its intention to seize the lands of indigenous people, doesn’t
mean anything: “Azerbaijan” had to demonstrate the potential to
implement proclaimed objectives. Well, Transcaucasian Turks didn’t
have that potential – political, military, ethnic nor social. At that
time, Transcaucasian Turks were majority of the population only on
Kura-Araks interfluve; in all other regions of the proclaimed republic
dominated indigenous people: Armenians, Talyshs, Lezgins, Tats,
Udis, Avars… Forces and opportunities of “Azerbaijan Republic’s”
“government” were enough only to have a foothold of the left-bank of
Gandzak city.

The authority in Baku, “capital” of the proclaimed “Azerbaijan
Republic” was lead by Stepan Shaumyan head of Baku commune; and
self-proclaimed “masters” of the city were not welcomed. Baku
revolutionary forces were intended to break military detachments
of Transcaucasian Turks that terrorized the interfluve population;
moreover, atrocities committed by the remnants of the defeated wild
division of Transcaucasian Tatars, and also illegality and invalidity
of Azerbaijan Republic proclamation had to be stopped. Throughout
the Eastern Transcaucasia rampaged the individual predatory forces
of Transcaucasian Turks, burning down villages and killing indigenous
population.

Under these conditions limited forces of Baku commune (among the
most distinguished heroism and dedication troops were under command
of Amazasp, Dashnak orders, Petrov orders, Bicherahov and others)
took control of most of the “Azerbaijan Republic”. Necessary to say,
it would be impossible without active support and participation of
indigenous peoples, who also didn’t want to live under “Muslims”
thumb. Baku commune’s forces didn’t enter only in Talysh, where
local population was able to drive the gangs of Transcaucasian Turks
by themselves.

By early summer Baku commune’s troops extended through almost entire
“Azerbaijan” except the territory from Gandzak’s left bank to the
border with Georgia. The “government” of “Azerbaijan Republic” was
in a state of agony since it didn’t see its “capital” when Turkey’s
aggression took place. There were first fighting of Baku commune’s
forces with combined troops of Anatolian and Transcaucasian Turks.

Baku commune’s forces deprived the assistance of raging in war Russia,
without possibility to provide full supply of food and ammunition,
slowly, with battles, retreated.

Turkish army advanced by a broad front, at the same time committing
the horrific acts of violence against the villages of Lezgins, Avars
and Udis, who assisted commune and drove troops of Transcaucasian
Turks from their lands. There were villages where everyone was cut.

Interesting, nowadays Baku ideologists try to present the mass graves
of indigenous peoples by… the impact of Armenian “atrocities”.

August 1, 1918, Turkish troops were in suburbs of Baku. There was
a hope to protect a city, especially with a fact, that behind enemy
lines remained some unconquered Armenian regions of Artsakh. Turks also
couldn’t gain foothold of the Greater Caucasus populated by Lezgins and
Avars. However, at that day Baku Bolsheviks decided to leave the city
by sea together with the armed forces. British troops located in Baku
also abstained from taking part in fighting and moved on ships. Thus,
the city was defended almost only by the Armenian troops.

The archival documents point at that fact, when Turkish troops
besieged Baku together with German officers made their suggestions and
ultimatums to surrender the city only to Armenians and representing
Armenian population Armenian National Council of Baku. Exerts from
one of those ultimatums is here below.

To Mr. Ter -Gazarov

I came as German envoy of General Staff that is in front of Baku in
order to discuss the possibility of putting Baku without a fight…

We owe the Armenians, our subjects (Mr. Neelo and his people) were
warned in time and they’ve been let to leave the Baku city, when they
were in danger. The more because of this we are ready to help you.

In case if you don’t want to leave this oil city intact in everyone’s
free use, then, there must be fight. Armenian life and Armenian
property will be destroyed.

We require you only:

1. to leave the Baku city not destroyed and intact, and permission
to use this oil city…

General Staff Colonel Paraken.

Turkish troops Commander Mursel

AI Ra, f.223, op. 1, d. 112, sheet 1 rev

Such ultimatums (there were many) confirm that: a) until 1918 Baku
didn’t belong to Transcaucasian Turks; b) Transcaucasian Turks
didn’t have enough of strength and abilities to capture the city by
themselves (they aren’t even mentioned in one of those ultimatums);
c) the assistance of Germans in Baku capture was due to the Turks
promises to pass them right to produce and use oil. This topic is very
interesting, and we’ll return to it, now let’s come back to our issue.

The heroic defense of Baku by the troops of Armenians lasted exactly
45 days. However, the forces were unequal; deprived of water, food
and ammunition city could not resist. September 15, Turks stormed the
city they’ve been followed by Transcaucasian “brothers”. Massacres and
slaughter of the Armenian population bore horrendous nature and scope.

During first three days were cut more than thirty thousand Armenians,
mostly, women, children and old men. There are thousands (!) of
archival documents, at our disposal narrating about those terrible
days. Baku was flooded with the Armenian blood. The genocidal
Azerbaijan Republic was originated on that blood.

From: A. Papazian

Senate Should Not Confirm Bryza As U.S. Ambassador To Azerbaijan

SENATE SHOULD NOT CONFIRM BRYZA AS U.S. AMBASSADOR TO AZERBAIJAN
By Harut Sassounian

15.09.2010

At the request of Sen. Barbara Boxer, the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee had postponed from early August to mid-September its vote
on Matt Bryza, nominee for U.S. Ambassador to Azerbaijan. Senators
Boxer, Harry Reid, and Robert Menendez were satisfied neither with
Bryza’s answers during the confirmation hearing nor subsequently with
his written responses.

While Congress was in recess for the past 40 days, a number of
newspapers and websites questioned the appropriateness of Bryza’s
nomination to such an important post. They raised several conflict
of interest issues regarding Bryza and his Turkish-born wife, Zeyno
Baran, who until recently was director of the Center for Eurasian
Policy at the Hudson Institute, a Washington think tank.

This article shall focus on a single issue — the allegation that
Bryza and Baran had received gifts during their August 23, 2007
wedding in Istanbul. If true, this would not only abort Bryza’s
chances of becoming ambassador, but more importantly, it would get
him into serious legal trouble. Under U.S. laws, government officials
and their spouses are prohibited from receiving gifts, even wedding
presents, unless these are given by close acquaintances. Such gifts
have to be reported to the U.S. government, and the Internal Revenue
Service. Bryza’s case is more complicated. If he got gifts that he
did not report, while telling the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
under oath that he did not receive such gifts, he could be charged
with non-reporting of a gift, tax evasion, and perjury.

Bryza’s celebrity wedding triggered a major controversy when Azeri
jouranlist Adil Khalil reported in the opposition newspaper Azadlig
that Haydar Babayev, Azerbaijan’s Minister of Economic Development,
had paid most of the couple’s wedding expenses. Babayev refuted
the accusation and filed a lawsuit for libel, causing Khalil to be
arrested, severely beaten, stabbed, and forced to flee to France. The
newspaper’s editor, Ganimat Zahid, was also arrested on unsubstantiated
charges. Last month, Azadlig suspended publication, after it was
evicted from its offices by the authorities. Having exhausted all
domestic court appeals, the newspaper’s editor filed a claim against
Azerbaijan with the European Court of Human Rights.

According to Azeri and Turkish media reports, around 400 prominent
guests from several countries attended Bryza’s 2007 lavish wedding,
held under tight security. Among the attendees from Turkey were the
Minister of Energy and Natural Resources, the U.S. Consul General in
Istanbul, the Armenian Patriarch of Turkey, members of parliament,
and major media figures. Bryza also invited Armenian officials to
his wedding, including Pres. Robert Kocharian and Foreign Minister
Vartan Oskanian, neither of whom attended. At the time, Bryza was
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and U.S. co-chair of the OSCE
Minsk Group, the mediators of the Artsakh (Karabagh) conflict.

Several high-ranking Azeri officials also attended Bryza’s wedding in
Istanbul: Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov who served as a wedding
witness, Minister of Economic Development Haydar Babayev, Azeri
National Petroleum Company President Rovnaq Abdullaev, Deputy Speaker
of Parliament Valeh Aleskerov, and Azerbaijan’s Consul General in Los
Angeles Elin Suleymanov. Pres. Ilham Aliyev’s letter of congratulation
was read at the start of the wedding. According to documents obtained
by this writer from the European Court of Human Rights, the Azeri
editor claimed that Pres. Aliyev sent “a special gift to the bride.”

Even though Bryza and Baran requested that in lieu of gifts guests
make a contribution to a Turkish charity, it is common practice
in the Middle East to hand gifts — particularly jewelry — to
a newlywed couple. For example, Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu, during a meeting with Hillary Clinton in Kabul in July,
told her that he would be sending a gift to the Secretary of State,
on the occasion of her daughter’s wedding.

According to the Media Rights Institute, Minister Babayev’s lawyers
confirmed during a court hearing in Baku that he attended the wedding
and “even had a gift” for Bryza. Yet, at his Senate confirmation
hearing, Bryza refuted the allegation that an Azeri official had
financed his wedding, adding that its entire cost was paid by the
couple’s families.

The allegation that Bryza received wedding gifts should be thoroughly
investigated before the Senate votes on his nomination. Even though
Senators and members of the Armenian, Greek, and Cypriot communities
oppose Bryza for multiple reasons, the wedding expenses and gifts
are the only issues that could have serious legal ramifications.

Therefore, the Senate should wait for the outcome of the lawsuit
filed by the Azeri editor in the European Court of Human Rights.

Bryza should fully cooperate with such an investigation in order to
clear the clouds of suspicion hanging over his head, before he is
rushed to Baku. He should provide the complete list of his wedding
guests and disclose all gifts received by the newlyweds and their
families.

U.S. investigators should contact everyone who attended Bryza’s
wedding to verify what gifts they gave to the couple on that occasion.

He should also be asked to produce a record of his wedding expenses
and how they were paid.

A few days ago, Sen. Boxer wrote a letter to this writer expressing
her serious concern about Bryza’s inadequate responses to her questions
both during and after the confirmation hearing. She pledged to continue
her efforts “to determine if he is the appropriate representative
for the United States in this highly volatile region of the world.”

Sen. Boxer and her colleagues should either reject Bryza’s nomination
outright or place a hold on it until all allegations against him are
investigated and proven to be true or false!

From: A. Papazian

http://www.noravank.am/eng/articles/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=5031

Akhtamar Mass: Liturgy, But No Peace Without A Cross At Landmark Rel

AKHTAMAR MASS: LITURGY, BUT NO PEACE WITHOUT A CROSS AT LANDMARK RELIGIOUS SERVICE IN TURKEY
By Gayane Lazarian

ArmeniaNow
20.09.10 | 19:14

News

For the first time in nearly a century Armenian Christians have had
a religious service in a 10th-century church on the Lake Van island
of Akhtamar, in what now is eastern Turkey.

The September 19 Liturgy at the Surb Khach (Holy Cross) Church was
conducted by Archbishop Aram Ateshian, the Armenian Patriarchal Vicar
of Constantinople. Service went on, despite the absence of a cross
on the dome of the church – a holy indicator for all Armenian churches.

Turkish officials say they intend to install one, but haven’t managed
yet. Besides, the church is now (since a 2007 renovation) officially
a museum where on Friday, according to a CNN report, one Catholic
priest was politely stopped from chanting, saying that praying was
not allowed in museums.

The Etchmiadzin See of the Armenian Apostolic Church refused to send
its delegates to the event after learning that Turkish authorities
had failed to honor their pledge to install the Christian symbol
atop the building by the time of the liturgy. This also prompted
many Armenian Christians in Armenia and abroad to cancel their booked
trips to Turkey en masse.

Still, the Sunday event stood out by its significance to many who
were present.

For the first time since the genocide of these areas’ original Armenian
population by Ottoman Turks coincidental to World War I, Van Turkish
authorities allowed a one-off liturgy and the red-stone Armenian church
was again shrouded in the sounds of a liturgy and the scent of incense.

Among an estimated 6,700 visitors to the island, about a thousand
were Armenians who had arrived from different corners of the world –
Europe, the United States, Armenia, but mostly from Istanbul, which
still has a relatively large community of ethnic Armenians.

The pilgrims lit candles in the church yard, kissed the Surb Khach
(Holy Cross) walls and whispered prayers.

Turkish authorities have tried to show a positive change in their
policy towards religious and ethnic minorities in a bid to improve
the country’s international image and better its chances to join the
European Union.

The Akhtamar event has been widely viewed as one in a series of
similar public shows of a changing Turkey.

Another major impact that the church service in Akhtamar would have is
to build more cultural bridges between Turks and Armenians in Turkey
and Armenia, with which Ankara still has no diplomatic ties.

The internationally backed rapprochement between Turkey and Armenia
stalled in April after an apparent move by Turkey to set preconditions
before it ratified in parliament two signed protocols on normalization.

But the widely advertised event fell short of expectations as it
proceeded against the backdrop of a major row over the cross.

After completing a $1.5 million project on the restoration of the
Armenian church at Akhtamar the Turkish government gave it the status
of a museum, implying that religious services, prayers and lighting
candles would be inappropriate inside. Later, in what Ankara presented
as a gesture of goodwill, Turkey allowed an Armenian religious service
once a year – something that still left many Armenians dissatisfied.

Authorities in Turkey further said the original design of the church
did not allow for the installation of a heavy cross atop the building
and said installing it before the Sunday service would mean risking
damage to the dome. They said, though, the cross might be set up
afterwards.

“They shouldn’t be thinking that they are doing a big favor. Let
them say what they have done to the rest of our sacred places –
they’ve turned them into stables and cattle-sheds. And today they are
allowing this liturgy conducted in a church without a cross. This
is just another bait of Turkish diplomacy,” said Murad Keyan,
a German-Armenian with roots in Kharberd, now in Turkey, who had
arrived in Van days before the event at Akhtamar.

Similar views were expressed also by participants of an alternative
church mass organized by protesters at Tsitsernakaberd, a hilltop
complex in Yerevan perpetuating the memory of 1.5 million Armenians
killed in Genocide. Hundreds of Armenians attended the event in which
the Akhtamar service was called another publicity stunt attempted
by Turkey.

Meanwhile, scores of international media, as well as 25 Armenian and
about 150 Turkish reporters, were providing an extensive coverage
to the events at Akhtamar. But only a limited number of journalists
were actually allowed to go inside the church during the time of the
service proper.

Still, there was plenty to report about the goings-on outside the
church walls.

Among the Armenians who had arrived to attend the ceremonies were
also those living in Turkey who had converted to Islam. They said
they’d come to see their countrymen.

“During the massacres my grandfather was adopted and raised by Kurds.

My grandfather would say to us that we are Armenians by our roots.

Today, I’ve come here just to see Armenians,” says Farsanda, a
70-year-old living in Baghesh. “I married a Kurd, and so did my
sister. And recently I found my cousins now living in Armenia.”

Islamized Armenians from Mush — Tekim (Hayk), Daniel, Mashala,
Hayrentin (Serob) were distributing grapes to the guests in one part
of the island.

“Hayk and Serob are our Armenian names. We have brought the grapes from
the village of Monkonk, which is two kilometers from Mush, which was
an old Armenian village where vineyards had originally been planted
by Armenians. Help yourselves,” says Tekim.

The Moslem Armenian says that several years ago in the village of
Sasnashen in Armenia’s Talin region he found his relatives and now
visits them once a year.

Candles were on sale in the church yard. Armenians who were visiting
the island were picking up rocks from around the place, taking a
handful of earth and filling it into their bags, taking some water
from Lake Van and filling it in bottles – to take to their distant
homes overseas as a reminder of their forefathers’ land.

An information panel on the island says the Surb Khach Church was
built by King Gagik I. But it does not mention that he was an Armenian
king and that the church itself was built by a priest called Manuel
in 915-921 AD at the behest of Vaspurakan King Gagik I.

The booklets telling about Van also leave out such information,
presenting it as a city built by Kurds.

“It’s a tragedy. Who doesn’t know that this is an Armenian church,
built by Armenians? Authorities [in Turkey] should remove the status
of a museum from the church and its use by Armenians must be allowed
all the time. If not, then this is just another Turkish political
gimmick,” said Nuran Akayan from Istanbul, who has his ancestral
roots in Sebastia.

From: A. Papazian

Akhtamar Island Used To Be A Venue Where Turkish Women Were Raped, S

AKHTAMAR ISLAND USED TO BE A VENUE WHERE TURKISH WOMEN WERE RAPED, SAY TURKISH NATIONALISTS

Tert.am
18:13 20.09.10

Turkish mass media, as expected, is widely covering the recent
long-awaited mass in Sourb Khach Church in Van, Eastern Turkey.

The reactions are various, but in general the Turkish media is making
an attempt to represent the event with as much bright colors and
positively as possible.

The main accentuations found in the Turkish newspaper and news agencies
particularly refer to the “friendship between the Armenian and Turkish
peoples,” “Turkish authorities’ tolerance,” “large number of Armenians
attending the mass despite calls to boycott it,” “the elimination of
one more taboo,” and the fact that all this is for the first time
ever taking place during the rule of Justice and Development Party
headed by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

There are other reactions too. Turkish daily Yeni Cagh, a newspaper
known for its nationalistic views, has published an article which says
that Akhtamar Island used to be an island “for raping Turkish women.”

“The Sourb Khach Church in Akhtamar renovated by the Justice and
Development Party is of great significance for the grand-children of
those Armenians who during the years of occupation would kidnap Turkish
women, bring them to the island and dishonor them. The Armenians,
who were with Russian weapons fighting against Turks during the First
World War, turned Akhtamar Island into an ‘island where Turkish women
were being raped’,” writes the paper.

From: A. Papazian

11th-Hour Attack On Boxer By WSJ Smells Of The Oil Lobby

11TH-HOUR ATTACK ON BOXER BY WSJ SMELLS OF THE OIL LOBBY
by Ara Khachatourian

Asbarez
Monday, September 20th, 2010

The Wall Street Journal’s September 20 attack piece on Senator
Barbara Boxer and the Armenian National Committee of America, which it
characterized as a group with “tribal Caucasian obsessions,” is the
last ditch effort by oil industry executives and the pro-Azerbaijan
lobby to save the deeply flawed nomination of U.S. Ambassador to
Azerbaijan designate Matt Bryza, just 24-hours prior to Senate Foreign
Relations Committee consideration of his candidacy.

And Bryza clearly needs all the help he can get. Rumors of his
impending nomination came up as early as May, 2009, but, curiously,
it took the Obama Administration a full year to submit Bryza’s name
for Senate approval. By July 22, when the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee grilled Bryza on his failed record in the Caucasus,
his uncomfortably close ties with Azerbaijan’s dictatorial regime,
and conflict of interest concerns regarding the work of his wife,
Zeyno Baran, it became obvious why it took so long.

There is no question that foreign service officers having close working
relationships with the leaders of the foreign countries can be an
asset in promoting US interests abroad. However the effective diplomat
must know where to draw the line. Bryza’s ties to Azerbaijan foreign
minister Elmar Mamedyarov – who served as one of three witnesses
at Bryza’s 2007 wedding – and the dearth of Azerbaijani Government
officials who attended the wedding and, allegedly may have even paid
for a portion of it – fundamentally weakens his ability to send a
strong pro-democracy, anti-war message to Azerbaijan’s leadership.

Baran’s participation on the editorial staff of an Azerbaijani
government sponsored journal titled “Azerbaijan Focus” – where she
serves along side Mamedyarov and Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet
Davutoglu, raises further questions as to where her allegiances lie.

Bryza’s public inaction in the face of the destruction of a 1300
year old Armenian cemetery in Djulfa, which featured thousands of
ornate “cross-stones” as grave markers, showed callous indifference
to the cultural and religious desecration committed by Azerbaijani
soldiers, condemned by the European Parliament and other international
institutions.

The Wall Street Journal, which since being purchased by Rupert Murdoch
has become the mouthpiece of right-wing conservatives, chooses to
ignore these facts as listed in a nine-page public memo prepared by
the ANCA. They also choose to ignore Bryza’s flimsy responses to a
series of oral and written questions submitted by Senators Boxer,
Menendez, Feingold, Shaheen and Committee Chairman John Kerry.

Instead they resort to a brazen show of partisan politics – hoping to
tie Senator Boxer’s concerns about a flawed nominee whose name should
never have been placed on the docket in the first place – to election
year politicking. The Wall Street Journal’s unnamed editorial team
ignores the Senator’s 20-year record of promoting a balanced U.S.

policy in the Caucasus that aims to end illegal blockades by Turkey
and Azerbaijan. They conveniently forget Boxer’s efforts to make human
rights and democracy a priority in a country where brutal dictators,
like Ilham Aliyev, continue to threaten war to maintain Stalin-imposed
borders.

They close their eyes to the deaths of some eight Armenian and
Azerbaijani soldiers on the Nagorno-Karabakh border in the last three
months alone – a result of a failed OSCE negotiating tactic, left over
from Bryza’s time as Minsk Group co-Chair, which emboldens Azerbaijani
military action through muted condemnation of these actions.

It is time for a new representative for Caucasus diplomacy-one without
Bryza’s bias and baggage. Senator Boxer understands that reality and
should be commended for her diligence on this matter.

Furthermore, President Obama should realize that his choice for an
ambassador to Baku has more support from the far-right conservative
community than members of his own party, who are trying to hold on
to their majority in Congress.

From: A. Papazian

Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang Highly Assesses Current Stage Of Arm

CHINESE VICE PREMIER LI KEQIANG HIGHLY ASSESSES CURRENT STAGE OF ARMENIAN-CHINESE RELATIONS

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
BEIJING

At today’s meeting with Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan in
Beijing (Peking) Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang highly assessed the
current stage of Armenian-Chinese relations. He conveyed the greetings
of Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao to Mr. Sargsyan, expressing hope that
this visit of the Armenian Prime Minister to China will contribute
to development of bilateral relations.

Tigran Sargsyan, expressing gratitude for warm reception, noted that
there is a huge potential for bilateral cooperation in economic sphere
and expressed hope that the bilateral ties will expand and develop
in near future. He noted that there are good examples of cooperation
in the sphere of economy, like the joint venture of “Shanxi-Nairit
Synthetic Rubber”, expressing wish to multiply suchlike examples.

The Armenian Prime Minister noted that an accelerator will be exploited
in the national center of Yerevan Physics Institute, and that this
program is intended to turn into an international project.

Tigran Sargsyan told the Chinese Vice Premier that the Chinese party
has been handed a package of proposals, which particularly includes
the spheres of agriculture, healthcare and information technologies.

During the meeting the parties also referred to cooperation in the
sphere of transport. The Armenian Prime Minister expressed gratitude
for China’s support and expressed hope that the presented programs
will be implemented in near future. The parties underlined that the
conduction of Armenian cultural days in China will greatly contribute
to expansion of the bilateral cooperation. The Chinese Vice Premier
said there is a close cooperation in all the spheres and the Chinese
party is ready to expand that cooperation.

He expressed hope that thanks to the upcoming joint work the
Armenia-Chinese relations will be elevated to a new level. He noted
that the corresponding departments of China will be given an assignment
to study the presented projects, the implementation of which will
be a new impetus for new economic ties. During the meeting bilateral
importance was attached to productivity increase of the activity of
the inter-governmental commission. The Vice Premier of China also
congratulated Tigran Sargsyan on Independence Day of Armenia.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Ambassador To China Highly Assesses Current Armenian-Chines

ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR TO CHINA HIGHLY ASSESSES CURRENT ARMENIAN-CHINESE POLITICAL COOPERATION

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
BEIJING

According to Armenian Ambassador to China Armen Sargsyan, the meeting
of Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan with Chinese Vice Premier
Li Keqiang held September 20 in Beijing (Peking), was one of the most
important events intended by the program on visit to China. A number
of issues on development of the further cooperation between the two
countries were discussed at the meeting. According to the ambassador,
the first step is already implemented, particularly in the sphere
of economy; the joint venture of “Shanxi-Nairit Synthetic Rubber”
has been established, which already produces rubber in China.

The next joint venture will open in Armenia, the sphere will be
determined during the upcoming negotiations. In particular, it will
perhaps be a factory of basalt procession. China provides aid of 3
million USD to Armenia every year, by which Armenia has the opportunity
of choosing the product, which it needs most. In the past years Armenia
was provided mini-tractors, ambulances will be delivered to Yerevan
in near future. According to Mr. Sargsyan, this time the Armenian
party wants to obtain buses to replenish the urban transport park,
in the direction of which practical negotiations are currently running.

Negotiations are running over a number of concrete projects in the
spheres of agriculture, industry, energy, transport and communication
as well. The Armenian Ambassador highly assesses the current
Armenian-Chinese political cooperation. According to him, these
relations have got ahead of the economic cooperation. The meeting
of the presidents of the two countries held this May stressed once
more that Armenia and China have registered quite a great progress
in political sphere.

Armen Sargsyan said that the parties have no problem or dispute
over the main international events, Armenia supports China in all
international organizations. China’s position toward Armenia is
quite distinct and well-balanced around issues like that of Nagorno
Karabakh. “In this regard we have no difficulty or problem,” the
ambassador assured.

From: A. Papazian

Wang Guangya: "We Have Always Looked Upon Armenia As Our Important P

WANG GUANGYA: “WE HAVE ALWAYS LOOKED UPON ARMENIA AS OUR IMPORTANT PARTNER COUNTRY IN CIS TERRITORY”

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
BEIJING

Independence Day of Armenia is traditionally celebrated in Armenian
embassies abroad as well. On September 20, Independence Day was
celebrated in the Armenian Embassy of People’s Republic of China with
participation of Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the
delegation headed by him. They have paid a five-day visit to China
from September 19.

Armenian Ministers of Economy and Culture Nerses Yeritsyan and Hasmik
Poghosyan, Chief of RA Government Staff Davit Sargsyan, Deputy Foreign
Minister Karine Ghazinyan and other officials comprise the delegation.

Before the start of the festive event, the Armenian Prime Minister got
acquainted with the activity and working conditions of the Armenian
Embassy, afterward he had talks with different countries’ diplomatic
missions in China, which partook in the celebration, as well with
representatives of the Armenian community and high ranking officials
of different local departments.

The three-story building of the Armenian Embassy in China, situated at
the address of No.9 Ta Yuan Nan Xiao Jie, Chaoyang District from April
2008, has been provided to Armenia by the Chinese party, which has got
a corresponding territory for building an embassy in Armenia instead.

The same day Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan had a meeting with
Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Wang Guangya. The latter first expressed
gratitude for RA Minister’s visit to China, and then congratulated
on Independence Day of Armenia. Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan noted
that Armenia attaches great significance to development of relations
with China, which is one of the most important directions in Armenia’s
foreign policy.

“There is quite a big potential for further development of those
relations,” the Armenian Prime Minister said. He underlined that
Armenia stands up for China’s principle on one state in international
area and instances, simultaneously expressing gratification for
China’s balanced policy in our region. The Armenian Prime Minister
pointed out the huge potential, which exists in economic sphere for
expanding the mutual cooperation. Pointing out the successful attempt
of “Shanxi-Nairit Synthetic Rubber” joint venture, Mr. Sargsyan
attached importance to implementation of new joint initiatives.

The head of the Armenian government expressed gratitude for the
technical support displayed to Armenia by China, particularly, for
providing agricultural cars and ambulances; the issue on providing
buses is in the agenda. Tigran Sargsyan mentioned that the Chinese
engineering is highly appraised in Armenia, and welcomed the readiness
to continue the support in this direction.

Wang Guangya expressed his gratitude for Armenia’s position toward
China’s issues, as well as for the support displayed in international
organizations. “We have always looked upon Armenia as our important
partner country in the territory of CIS. We respect the direction
of development, which you have chosen in accordance with national
peculiarities,” the Chinese Vice Foreign Minister said. He assured that
China is very attentive to the issues of Armenia, and approaches them
with comprehension, supporting Armenia in international organizations.

According to the Vice Foreign Minister, the current stage of political
relations must be strengthened by activation of economic relations. He
welcomed all the concrete proposals presented by the Armenian party
in the sphere of economy. The Vice Foreign Minister assured that they
will continue to extend technical support to Armenia. The Armenian
Prime Minister presented to Wang Guangya the latest developments of
Armenian-Turkish relations, the initiatives of the Armenian party in
that direction, particularly, the proposal of opening of the border
without preconditions, in response to which it turned out that the
Turkish party is not ready for a dialogue.

China’s Vice Foreign Minister noted that they follow those developments
and attach importance to establishment of good relations between
neighbors, stand up for the initiative of the Armenian party, which
proves that Armenia is a peace loving country. The participants of
the meeting attached bilateral importance to the activity of the
Armenian-Chinese joint commission, noting that its next session will
be summoned in the upcoming months. The Armenian Prime Minister
referred to the possible investment programs, which can present
interest for China.

He conveyed a package to the Chinese party, where concrete projects
of bilateral interest are included. In the morning of September 20,
Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the delegation headed by him
paid a familiarization visit to “Forbidden City” imperial palace and
museum of Beijing (Peking). Late in the evening the Armenian Prime
Minister and the delegation headed by him, will travel to Shanghai,
and will participate September 21 in “Shanghai Expo” center in the
event of the national day, as well as will have a number of meetings,
including with Mayor of Shanghai Han Zheng.

From: A. Papazian

Kostantin Zatulin Awarded With Order Of Honor

KOSTANTIN ZATULIN AWARDED WITH ORDER OF HONOR

ARMENPRESS
SEPTEMBER 20, 2010
YEREVAN

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan has signed a decree on awarding
an Order of Honor to Kostantin Zatulin, Russian politician,
first deputy chairman of the committee of the State Duma for the
CIS and relations with Russian nationals abroad, for outstanding
contribution to expansion of cooperation between Armenia and Russia,
to strengthening and development of friendship between the two
countries. RA presidential press service told Armenpress that with
another decree of the head of the republic Ara Badalyan has been
given a diplomatic title of RA Extraordinary Ambassador and Minister
Plenipotentiary.

From: A. Papazian