Armenia Strengthening Security Of State Border With Azerbaijan

ARMENIA STRENGTHENING SECURITY OF STATE BORDER WITH AZERBAIJAN

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 13:37:00

ArmInfo. Armenia is strengthening security of the state border with
Azerbaijan. Defense Minister Seyran Ohanyan said at the government
session in the town of Ijevan, Tavush region, the Defense Ministry has
brought some frontier posts forward on the border with Azerbaijan in
the region of Tavush. Reporting on the results of the combined work
with the Tavush regional administration, the minister said that they
took measures to improve the household conditions of servicemen at
the frontier facilities and to correct the borderline.

“We could echelon our positions in some areas were land is not
cultivated. Mountainous areas and forests create some difficulties
to reduction of space between the posts, however, we have taken some
measures to settle this problem as well,” the minister said.

He recalled that 2 attempts of penetration by Azerbaijan subversion
groups had been prevented recently in the area of the village of Koti.

In response to Azerbaijan’s sabotages, the Armenian party made
response actions.

“We are raising public awareness of civil defense in the region
considering that in case of possible aggression by Azerbaijan the
greatest part of the region will occur under fine of the enemy,”
the minister said.

From: A. Papazian

Russia Does Not Need For Events In Georgia In August 2008 To Recur I

RUSSIA DOES NOT NEED FOR EVENTS IN GEORGIA IN AUGUST 2008 TO RECUR IN KARABAKH

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 13:38:00

ArmInfo. Russia does not need for the events in Georgia in August
2008 to recur in Nagorno Karabakh, Head of the Planning Department
of Russian president’s administration for interregional and cultural
relations with foreign countries Sergey Chebotarev said today in
Yerevan during a one-day research-to-practice conference “Russia and
Armenia in the world and regional politics: problems and prospects”.

“After the tragic August events during the Georgian-South Ossetian
conflict in 2008, we must do our best to prevent recurrence of such
a scenario in the region. This concerns the situation around the
Karabakh conflict, first of all”, he said.

Chebotarev noted the high level of cooperation between Armenia and
Russia and said presidents of the two countries meet no rarely than
once per month. He also said the first state visit of the Russian
president to Armenia marked a new stage in relations between the
two countries.

“The point is that these relations develop on the basis of
complementarity and interdependence”, he emphasized.

The “Eurasian Research Institute” non-commercial organization is
organizer of the afore-mentioned conference. A number of experts
and political experts from Russia and Armenia, as well as Russia’s
Ambassador to Armenia Vyacheslav Kovalenko took part in the conference.

From: A. Papazian

Russian Expert: Russia Is Committed To Famous Policy Of Armenian Com

RUSSIAN EXPERT: RUSSIA IS COMMITTED TO FAMOUS POLICY OF ARMENIAN COMPLEMENTARISM IN ITS RELATIONS WITH ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 13:40:00

ArmInfo. Russia is committed to the famous policy of Armenian
complementarism in its relations with Armenia and Azerbaijan, Alexander
Krilov research fellow at the Russian Academy of Sciences Institute
of Global Economy and International Relations said at the one-day
workshop conference “Russia and Armenia in Global and Regional Policy:
Problems and Perspectives” in Yerevan on Thursday.

“What is important now is that Armenia is Russia’s mainstay in the
Caucasus and Azerbaijan is the country Russia consistently develops
partner relations with. It is important that all this is neither at
the expense of nor in prejudice of Armenia. This becomes more sound
for lack of diplomatic relations between Russia and Georgia,” he said.

Krilov highlighted that Moscow strives to strengthen its positions
in the region through partnerships with Azerbaijan and Turkey, hereby
confirming its success after the august war of 2008.

The event is organized by the EurAsian Research Institute Development
Fund Armenian Branch Non-Profit Organization with the support of the
Russian President’s Department for Interregional and Cultural Ties
with Foreign Countries. A number of experts and politicians from
Russia and Armenia and Russian Ambassador to Armenia Vyacheslav
Kovalenko attended the event.

From: A. Papazian

Russian Ambassador To Armenia: Having Taken Armenia’s Or Azerbaijan’

RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR TO ARMENIA: HAVING TAKEN ARMENIA’S OR AZERBAIJAN’S SIDE, RUSSIA WILL TURN OUT TO BE ASIDE OF KARABAKH PROCESS

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 13:41:00

ArmInfo. Having taken Armenia’s or Azerbaijan’s side, Russia will turn
out to be aside of the Karabakh process, and this is an axiom we have
to understand, Russian Ambassador to Armenia Vyacheslav Kovalenko said
today in Yerevan during a one-day research-to-practice conference
“Russia and Armenia in the world and regional politics: problems
and prospects”.

“We have been explaining this axiom to Georgia for one and a half
year persuading its leadership that the Abkhaz and South Ossetian
problem can be solved only by achieving a compromise, however, this
axiom was not perceived by there, that resulted in a war with all the
subsequent events”, he said. According to Kovalenko, today’s policy
of Russia with respect to the Karabakh conflict currently implies,
first of all, non- admission of resumption of military operations on
Karabakh borders. Moscow can achieve it just be keeping neutrality
in the Karabakh conflict.

The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict broke out on February 28 1988 in the
Azerbaijani Sumgait with massacre of Armenians as a peculiar response
of Azerbaijanis to the peaceful demand of the Nagorno-Karabakh
autonomous Region, part of the Azerbaijani SSR, to unite with the
Armenian SSR. This resulted in other pogroms of Armenians in Baku,
Kirovabad and other regions of Azerbaijan populated with Armenians.

In 1991 Azerbaijan unleashed war against peaceful populations of
Nagorno-Karabakh, expulsing ethnic Armenians from the territory of
Azerbaijan. Dozens of thousands of peaceful residents on both parties
were killed in the military actions, and hundreds of thousands were
left homeless and have become refugees.

From: A. Papazian

Russian Ambassador: Armenia Is Russia’s Support In The South Caucasu

RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR: ARMENIA IS RUSSIA’S SUPPORT IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 13:41:00

Arminfo.Armenia is Russia’s support in the South Caucasus, Russia’s
Ambassador to Armenia Vyacheslav Kovalenko said at the scientific
conference ‘Russia and Armenia in the world and regional policy:
problems and prospects’ held in Yerevan today.

‘For this reason, Russia has to do everything possible to prevent a
new war in the region. It is indisputable and prior, as today nobody
needs a new war in the Caucasus. It is better to negotiate for 20
years than to war for a day. We are doing it today and I think our
intermediary efforts will nevertheless be crowned with success’, –
the ambassador said.

From: A. Papazian

Armenian Expert: Relations Between Armenia And Russia Rather Seem To

ARMENIAN EXPERT: RELATIONS BETWEEN ARMENIA AND RUSSIA RATHER SEEM TO BE RELATIONS BETWEEN POWER REPRESENTATIVES, MEMBERS OF POWER MINISTRIES AND OLIGARCHS

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 14:02:00

ArmInfo. Relations between Armenia and Russia rather seem to be
relations between power representatives, members of power ministries
and oligarchs. Imperfection, instability and sometimes archaism of
institutes do not allow to speak of successful institutionalization
of our cooperation, expert of the Armenian Center for Political and
International Studies Ruben Mehrabyan said today in Yerevan during a
one- day research-to-practice conference “Russia and Armenia in the
world and regional politics: problems and prospects”.

“Therefore, the real deeds, based on a mutual respect of real and
legal interests, are often replaced by ritual phrases about eternal
friendship, which bear no relation to the real policy in the current
format of interstate relations”, he said. According to Mehrabyan,
the Russian president’s vision of problems and their solution ways in
Russia serves a basis for a new political paradigm which is appropriate
to the 21st century and is able to change the state of affairs not
only in Russia but also in the whole post-Soviet space.

Armenia faces the same challenges in the 21st century which require
similar approaches for their overcoming, surely, corrected to the
difference of scales.

The “Eurasian Research Institute” non-commercial organization is
organizer of the afore- mentioned conference. A number of experts
and political experts from Russia and Armenia, as well as Russia’s
Ambassador to Armenia Vyacheslav Kovalenko took part in the conference.

From: A. Papazian

Let’s Make Dolphinarium Popular!

LET’S MAKE DOLPHINARIUM POPULAR!

ArmInfo
2010-09-29 20:12:00

ArmInfo. No sooner had Armenian ecologists expressed discontent about
the construction of a dolphinarium in Yerevan than the Municipality of
Yerevan started calming people down with their promises to “improve”
the territory.

According to an old tradition, the Municipality’s press release focuses
on the desperate state of one more park in Yerevan, this time, the
Park after Komitas, where actually the dolphinarium will be built.

The Municipality enumerates all the shortcomings and then expresses
its desire to improve the green zone of the park by launching
new construction – a method, the residents of Yerevan are already
well-aware of. Mayor of Yerevan Gagik Beglaryan says that a new
irrigation and illumination system, as well as roundabouts will be
installed in the park. Moreover, the parking area has already been
built, which is so characteristic of the Municipality that is very much
concerned with reduction of green zones. The residents of Yerevan are
sad. By their bitter experience they already know that with the word
“improvement” the Municipality of Yerevan conceals destruction of
green territories in favor of easy profits from cafes and restaurants.

One example is the Students Park, a green area turned by Beglaryan
into a concrete desert. Beglaryan’s reason was allegedly to improve
the territory near the Viktor Hambartsumyan Monument. As a result,
the monument has found itself cramped between two ugly cafe-like
buildings with no single lawn left nearby.

The public protest has grown into a lawsuit but Beglaryan is not
afraid. Now that he has “cultivated” the Students Park he has rushed
to “improve” the Komitas Park. We already know what this improvement
will end in: cut trees and construction mud.

By the way, the dolphinarium is said to be the project of Ex Mayor
of Yerevan Yervand Zakharyan, which means that all attempts to defend
the green area are doomed to failure.

From: A. Papazian

Swiss Foreign Minister Argues Against Halfness Of Armenian-Turkish R

SWISS FOREIGN MINISTER ARGUES AGAINST HALFNESS OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RECONCILIATION PROCESS

ArmInfo
2010-09-30 11:00:00

ArmInfo. On September 29, Armenian parliament speaker Hovik Abrahamyan
met Swiss Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey within the frames of
his visit to Switzerland.

As the parliamentary press service reports, during the meeting the
speaker emphasized that Armenia gives high priority to development
of multi-vector relations with Switzerland, in particular, to
this country’s intermediary mission during solution of different
international problems. According to him, the Armenian authorities
highly appreciate the assistance by Switzerland aimed at implementation
of social and economic reforms in Armenia.

The parties also discussed the Armenian-Turkish reconciliation
process. In this context, H. Abrahamyan said the preconditions,
set forth by Turkey, are unacceptable for Armenia, and, taking into
account inappropriate delays of ratification of the protocols in
the Turkish parliament, President Serzh Sargsyan recalled them from
the Armenian parliament agenda, having however preserved Armenia’s
signatures under the documents.

In her turn, Swiss FM emphasized that this process cannot remain
unaccomplished: active consultations are currently going on with both
parties to create favourable conditions to continue the talks.

“Switzerland is quite decided about promotion of the process”,
she added.

From: A. Papazian

On History And Actual Problems Of Armenians Of Dersim

ON HISTORY AND ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ARMENIANS OF DERSIM
Ruben Melkonyan

30.09.2010

R. Melkonyan – the senior expert of the Centre of the Armenian Studies
of “Noravank” Foundation, the vice-dean of the Faculty of Oriental
Studies at the YSU

Dersim, which is currently on the territory of Turkey, in different
periods took a special place for the Armenians, Zazas and Kurds who
were established there. Due to its geographic position Dersim had been
an asylum for the rebels and those who were persecuted for many times.

There is a legend that in that very mountainous province a group of
Armenians who had not adopted Christianity in 4th century sheltered.

Later, during the Pavlikian and Tondrakian movements Dersim served
as an asylum for the followers of those teachings. Its mountainous
geographical position had also influenced the characters of people
living there – unruliness and courage were wide spread in Dersim. It
is also known that after the establishment of the Ottoman rule,
Dersim preserved its semi-independent status which bothered Turkish
rulers in different periods.

It should be mentioned that besides the autochthons – Armenians,
there were also Zazas and Kurds among whom Alevism was rather
widespread which presuppose religious tolerance. This religious
belonging considerably distinguished Alevi Zazas from Muslims from
other regions of Empire, where religious extremism often prevailed.

Friendly relations of the Armenians from Dersim with neighbour Alevi
Zazas also played a certain role during the Armenian Genocide in 1915:
according to different sources about 30-40 thousand Armenians from
both Dersim and other neigbouring regions inhabited by the Armenians
were sheltered by Alevi Zazas. It should also be mentioned that local
heads of Alevi Zaza tribes saved Armenians because of their faith too,
which is mostly anthropocentric. But we must also add that at the
same time there were cases when a number of Dersim Kurdish and Zaza
tribes collaborated with Ottoman authorities and participated in the
massacres of the Armenians and pillage of their property. The evidences
of the mean betrayal of Zaza heads of tribes have also preserved.

However, the issue of the Armenians who sheltered in the mountains
of Dersim became a subject to discuss and negotiate for the central
Ottoman authorities and local heads of tribes because Turkish
authorities demanded to deliver up the Armenians. This demand caused
a serious problem for Alevis because they faced a difficult choice
between the order of the central authorities and their religious
principles. And very often the order was declined and when the
demands became stricter heads of tribes helped a part of the sheltered
Armenians to escape to Eastern Armenia or Russia.

But besides all this, there were many cases registered when Armenians
who found shelter with Alevi had to change their names, religion
(often outwardly) and present themselves as Alevi Zazas. This
circumstance allowed the heads of tribes to say that the suspects were
not Armenians but they were Alevi Zazas. And that was the way many
thousand Armenians had converted and became Alevis. A part of them
managed to preserve openly or secretly their national traditions and
the other part merged with Alevis. It is important to mention that not
so radical stance of the surrounding Alevi population allowed Armenians
from Dersim and their generations to preserve some elements of their
Armenian identity if they wanted till our days, but, nevertheless, the
predominant element had decisive influence on the self-consciousness
of the generations of the Armenians.

In this regard the well-known Armenian Mirakian kin, a part of which
settled in different countries, including Armenia, after leaving
Dersim, but some of them still live in Dersim under the name of “Mirak
Ashiret”. Unfortunately, as the specialists who visited them mention,
today’s generations of Mirakians preserved only a memory of their
Armenian descent. It is remarkable that even today they are proud of
the rebellious and bellicose image of their ancestors – Mirakians,
which make those generations acknowledge their origin.

As a result of the centuries-long Armenian presence in Dersim and
the fact that many thousand Armenians found shelter there during the
Genocide, many elements of Armenian culture, habits, language were
passed to the Zaza environment. For example, in the Zaza language there
is a layer of loanwords from Armenian, a number of Zaza holidays and
habits have Armenian features, till present a number of old Armenian
place names is used among people of Dersim. But it should also be
mentioned that the Turkish anti-Armenian propaganda has influenced
Dersim too and there are facts which come to prove that even in Alevi
environment being an Armenian was not always encouraged.

The preconceived and hostile attitude of the Ottoman Empire in regard
to Dersim continued and even intensified in republican Turkey: the
semi-independent status of Dersim turned into one of the issues which
cause concern to the Kemalist authorities.

Back in the 1930s Kemalist authorities initiated the radical solution
of Dersim issue: the methods of solution were the same the Young Turks
used. In 1937-1938 in Dersim genocide was perpetrated by the state
during which the methods used during the Armenian Genocide were used.

According to different sources during the genocide in Dersim 70-90
thousand people were killed and the whole population of the province
was exiled to other Turkish provinces. The issue of the Dersim genocide
needs scrutiny but we would like to turn to one of its episodes. We
can clearly say that one of the main and important target groups for
the Turkish authorities were the Armenians who sheltered there after
1915. Many facts, evidences of the survivors come to prove that the
events of 1937-1938 were the continuation of the Armenian Genocide for
the Armenians from Dersim; over those years a part of the Armenians
who survived in 1915 was killed. It should also be mentioned that
Turkish authorities presented the fact that Zazas sheltered Armenians
as substantiation for massacres to the troops which took part in the
Dersim genocide.

Today in Turkey a research is carried out within the scope of which
the stories concerning the Dersim genocide are collected and, due to
the fact that it is very difficult to find any objective data about
those events in official Turkish documents, the confessions of those
who survived and took part in those events are of important as a source
for the study. Thus, one of the Turkish army soldiers who participated
in those events confessed that their commanders before ordering them
to kill Zazas substantiated it in the following way: “They are those
who sheltered Armenians and this is the reason they must be destroyed”.

It is interesting and very remarkable that in our days among the
Armenians from Dersim a process of attaching importance to their
origin and reclaiming their identity can be observed. Lower we will
bring some remarkable facts concerning the current conditions of the
Armenians from Dersim which was wrote down in 2009 during the “9th
Mndzurian Festival”. Thus, the participant of Mndzurian Festival,
Bagrat Estukian from “Agos” daily mentions: “I already felt there was
something native about those people. I had read before that there
were many of those whose ancestors were of Armenian descent. But I
never thought that there were so many of them… The other surprising
phenomenon was that nobody tried to conceal its descent. People
there got used to present themselves through the integrity of Alevi
religion, Kurdish political movements and Armenian identity. This
combination, which is strange for us, Armenians from Istanbul, is
quite a natural phenomenon for people from Dersim. … You can meet
the splinters of Armeniancy all over Anatolia. And in Dersim you
can meet Armenians. They are neither crypto-Armenians nor those who
disclaimed their roots; they are simply special, unique”. The other
evidence presented by Bagrat Estukian speaks about the peculiar way the
traces of Christianity have preserved among the Armenians from Dersim:
“One of them took out a cross from under his shirt, showed it to me and
said: “Don’t get me wrong, I’m atheist, and Alevism is my culture, but
this cross is a symbol that I’m a grandson of Shoghakat grandmother,
the son of Hambardzumian kin”.

In August 2010 it became clear that a group of Armenians from
Dersim initiate the establishment of the NGO to shift the process of
reclaiming of their identity to a qualitatively new level. The NGO have
to carry researches concerning the culture, history, religion, language
of the Armenians from Dersim. The initiator is the Armenian from Dersim
Selahettin Gultekin who has also changed his name and became Mirhan
Gultekin. As Mirhan mentions one of the goals of the organization
is to make so that the Armenians from Dersim and their generations
return to their roots, live without hiding their real identity, bear
Armenian and not Turkish or Kurdish names, protect Armenian churches,
monuments, graveyards in Dersim, to restore officially old Armenian
names of the villages. “Armenians from Dersim should protect their
identity and culture. They should reclaim their origin; they should
send their children to churches. For all those purposes we must have
an organization and I call all the Armenians and first of all those
from Dersim, to help this organization”, – mentions Mirhan Gultekin.

Let us also remind in the end that such an organization was created
by the Armenians from Sasun living in Turkey who try to carry works to
preserve Armenian churches and holy places in Sasun. Of course, under
the state policy of Turkey those organizations cannot have a broad
field of activity but the attempts of different groups of Armenians
in Turkey to self-organize are remarkable and, at the same time, they
put forward interesting developments connected with searching and
“reclaiming” national identity.

“Globus National Security”, issue 5

——————————————————————————–
Another materials of author

ON CURRENT CONDITION OF THE ARMENIAN PATRIARCHATE IN
ISTANBUL[15.07.2010] ARMENIAN COMMUNITY IN ISTANBUL IN THE CONTEXT
OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS[27.05.2010] THE GENERATIONS OF THE
CONVERTED ARMENIANS IN EUROPE[17.05.2010] ON PERCEPTION OF THE ISSUE
OF THE ISLAMIZED ARMENIANS [06.04.2010] FORCIBLE ISLAMIZATION OF THE
ARMENIANS DURING THE GENOCIDE: PROCESS AND EFFECTS[19.03.2010]

From: A. Papazian

http://noravank.am/eng/articles/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=5054

Khosrov Reserve Management Gives Hostile Reception To Volunteers’ Ef

KHOSROV RESERVE MANAGEMENT GIVES HOSTILE RECEPTION TO VOLUNTEERS’ EFFORTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
September 30, 2010 – 16:20 AMT 11:20 GMT

Writer Vahram Tatikyan said that during a visit of volunteers’ group,
which deals with waste removal from the territory of Havuts Tar (9th
century) monastery, to Khosrov reserve, they revealed evidences of
poaching – dead bodies of animals and shells.

Volunteers managed to gather a huge quantity of waste. However,
foresters and local residents pollute the territory “more diligently”,
instead of expressing gratitude to volunteers and strengthening
cooperation with them, Tatikyan told a press conference on September
30.

“Thus, I am going to apply to all international instances with a demand
to recognize Armenia as a place, which is absolutely inappropriate for
tourism, as before tourists’ visit to Armenia, we should thoroughly
clean it,” noted Tatikyan.

Activist of several initiative groups Mariam Sukhudyan noted for her
part that the management of Khosrov reserve gives a hostile reception
to all efforts of volunteers. Besides, currently volunteers can enter
the reserve territory only with a special permission provided by the
RA Ministry of Nature Protection or Ministry of Culture.

From: A. Papazian