Joint Response to Anti-Russian Sanctions Not on EEU Agenda So Far: D

Joint Response to Anti-Russian Sanctions Not on EEU Agenda So Far: Diplomat

(c) Photo
POLITICS
11:34 31.12.2014(updated 13:25 31.12.2014)

Members of the Moscow-led Eurasian Economic Union have no plans to
respond to the Western economic sanctions, according to Russian Deputy
Foreign Minister Vasily Nebenzya.

(c) SPUTNIK/ MAXIM BLINOV
Some 40 States Ready to Create Free Trade Zone With EEU: Diplomat
MOSCOW, December 31 (Sputnik) – Members of the Moscow-led Eurasian
Economic Union have not yet considered a joint response to the Western
economic restrictions against Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Vasily
Nebenzya said Wednesday.

The union currently has five members – Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan,
Armenia and Kyrgyzstan.

“The issue of joint actions in response to the West’s restrictive
measures against Russia is not on the agenda at present, though the
legislative base of the Customs Union allows it,” Vasily Nebenzya
said.

In March, following Russia’s reunification deal with Crimea, the
United States, the European Union and a number of their allies
introduced a package of sanctions against Russia. They included asset
freezes and visa restrictions on some individuals and envisaged
scrapping business contacts with Russia.

(c) SPUTNIK/ ALEKSEI DRUZHININ
Eurasian Economic Union to Continue Work With US Despite Tensions: Official
In April, the West continued its pressure on Russia by ratcheting up
sanctions, citing the country’s alleged meddling in the military
conflict in southeastern Ukraine.

Russia repeatedly denied the accusations, stressing that sanctions are
counterproductive and warned of a possible boomerang effect on the
countries that imposed them.

In August, Russia responded by introducing a year-long ban on food
imports from the countries that had sanctioned it.

In mid-December, the United States, European Union and Canada
introduced a new round of sanctions targeting Russia and specifically
Crimea. Speaking about the move last week, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov
told journalists that Russia was considering its response, but did not
provide any details.

From: A. Papazian

http://sputniknews.com/politics/20141231/1016427082.html

Croissance rapide du secteur des technologies et de l’information

Bilan
Croissance rapide du secteur des technologies et de l’information

Le secteur des technologies et de l’information (TI) reste le secteur
le plus dynamique de l’économie de l’Arménie. Il a augmenté de 25 % en
2014, selon les statistiques officielles.

Les données préliminaires du ministère arménien de l’Economie montre
que près de 400 entreprises de TI atteignent près de 475 millions de
dollars. Le chiffre est équivalent à environ 5 % du produit intérieur
brut et près d’un tiers des exportations arméniennes de 2013.

L’industrie informatique arménienne, qui est dominée par les filiales
locales des géants de logiciels américains, avait généré seulement 1,7
% du PIB en 2010. Le nombre total de personnel qualifié qui y
travaillent a depuis plus que doublé, atteignant environ 11 600
personnes.

Le secteur, orienté vers l’exportation, avait déjà augmenté en moyenne
de 22 % par an entre 2008 et 2013. Le gouvernement arménien s’attend à
ce que cette croissance se poursuive sans relche dans les années à
venir. Certains représentants du gouvernement ont prévu que les
recettes d’exploitation annuel du secteur passera la barre des 1
milliard de dollars en 2019.

Une grande partie de cette croissance rapide est due aux entreprises
américaines telles que Synopsys, National Instruments, Mentor Graphics
et VMware. Synopsys, leader mondial de la conception de la puce,
emploie environ 700 ingénieurs en Arménie. Sa branche locale est ainsi
la plus grande entreprise informatique du pays.

VMware, qui a affiché un bénéfice net de 1 milliard de dollars en
2013, prévoit de doubler la taille de sa filiale arménienne, qui
emploie actuellement plus de 60 spécialistes. “Les résultats de
l’entreprise nous donnent confiance. Nous allons investir environ 100
000 000 $ dans les quatre ou cinq prochaines années “, avait annoncé
Raghu Raghuram, vice-président du géant du logiciel basée en
Californie, lors d’une visite à Erevan en novembre 2013.

Oracle, deuxième plus grand développeur de logiciels au monde, a mis
en place une filiale en Arménie il y a tout juste un mois. Le poids
lourd de la Silicon Valley aurait l’intention d’étendre son bureau de
recherche et développement à Erevan.

L’industrie informatique a été encore renforcée ces dernières années
par un nombre croissant de startups partiellement ou totalement
détenues par des Arméniens. Selon le ministère de l’Economie, plus de
200 de ces entreprises ont vu le jour depuis 2007. Celles-ci incluent
PicsArt, à la tête de l’une des plus populaires applications de
retouche photo. La société basée à Erevan a rapporté plus de 100
millions de téléchargements de logiciels depuis le lancement de son
produit phare, il y a trois ans.

Une autre startup arménienne spécialisée dans les applications
mobiles, Inlight, a suscité un vif intérêt auprès d’une société basée
à Los Angeles, Science Inc., et a été acquise par ce dernier en
juillet.

mercredi 31 décembre 2014,
Claire (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

USC Shoah Foundation to Add Testimonies from Armenian Genocide Survi

USC Shoah Foundation to Add Testimonies from Armenian Genocide Survivors

Wednesday, December 31st, 2014 | Posted by Contributor

Dr. J. Michael Hagopian recorded many of the video testimonies that
will be added to the USC Shoah Foundation’s archives

LOS ANGELES–In honor of the upcoming 100th anniversary of the Armenian
Genocide that will be commemorated on April 24, 2015, USC Shoah
Foundation – The Institute for Visual History and Education is
readying at least 40 of the nearly 400 Armenian testimonies it has
secured from the Armenian Film Foundation for inclusion in the Visual
History Archive. It is anticipated the entire collection will be
integrated by the fall of 2015.

USC Shoah Foundation and the Armenian Film Foundation signed an
agreement in April of 2010 to digitize the interviews the late Dr. J.
Michael Hagopian recorded on 16mm film between 1972 and 2005. Hagopian
was an Emmy-nominated filmmaker who made 70 educational films and
documentaries during his career, including 17 films about Armenians
and the Armenian Genocide, winning more than 160 awards for his work.

“This project will unveil a trove of film testimony about of a
horrific chapter of human history that remains woefully
under-examined,” said Karen Jungblut, director of research and
documentation at the Institute. “It also brings a new viewing
experience to the Visual History Archive in that these interviews –
most of which predate our 1994 founding – were conducted mainly for
the purpose of creating documentaries, not necessarily standalone life
histories.”

The Armenian collection contains a broad range of interviewee
categories, including not only survivors of the Armenian Genocide, but
also of other groups targeted by the Ottoman Turks, such as the
Greeks, Assyrians and Yezidis. Also included are non-victim witnesses
to the atrocities – such as Christian missionaries and Arab villagers
– as well as descendants of the survivors and several renowned
scholars.

The Institute is integrating the testimonies into the Archive with the
help of Richard G. Hovannisian, a professor emeritus at UCLA and a
leading expert in Armenian studies.

“The addition of these interviews to the Visual History Archive will
provide broad access to a multilingual collection of material,” said
Hovannisian, now an adjunct professor of history at USC and the
project’s scholarly adviser. “It will help to bring sorely needed
attention – and study – to this dark corner of human understanding.”

Because these interviews were conducted by a documentary filmmaker,
this collection brings diversity to the Visual History Archive when it
comes to the style and format of the testimonies, as well as the
methodology used to collect them.

The most immediately noticeable distinction is that all of the
interviews were recorded on film — so a clapboard kicks off every take
to synchronize sound and picture. The testimonies themselves are
generally much shorter – averaging 15 minutes in length, while the
other testimonies in the Visual History Archive run more than two
hours on average. Some survivors are also interviewed more than once,
over a period of time.

Unlike the other existing collections in the Visual History Archive,
the Armenian testimonies – with a few exceptions — are not
chronologies. Filmmaker Hagopian intended the interviews to be filmed
depositions – limited only to the eyewitness account of the survivor
during the genocide – and not beyond. Interviewees in the Archive to
date have given their life stories before, during and after the
genocide in question.

The filmmaker also relied on pre-interviewing the subjects, to be
certain they were actually eyewitnesses to the events. The camera was
only turned on when he was satisfied they were indeed eyewitnesses,
and not speaking from hearsay. The interviewee would then be asked to
tell Hagopian his or her story – the same story relayed in the
pre-interview process.

On occasion, the Armenian interviews were conducted in groups – such
as in churches or old-age homes.

Unlike existing collections in the Visual History Archive, this is a
documentary film collection, containing the complete unedited
interviews, including behind-the-scenes footage. While the camera
positioning on all testimonies currently contained in the Visual
History Archive are fixed, the camera in the Armenian collection zooms
in and out, and pans left and right. The purpose of moving the camera
was for establishing and editing shots – standard practice for
documentary filmmakers.

Unlike video interviews, where the sound and picture are combined on
one tape, 16mm film interviews include separately recorded sound and
picture. Each interview includes both the “synched up” sound and
picture, as well as any additional sound the filmmaker recorded
(labelled as “audio only” sections).

To save production costs associated with shooting in 16 mm film,
Hagopian only turned the camera on when the survivor or eyewitness was
speaking about a relevant issue (based on the pre-interview). If he
thought they were wandering off track, he would only record their
sound. If he thought the anecdote was worthy of recording on film, he
would turn the camera on. All of the extra sound for every interview
is included in the collection (in “audio only” sections).

Film school students will be interested to see and hear off-camera
moments in this collection, which include occasional technical faults,
and directions by the filmmaker to his sound recordist, translators
and camera assistants. Members of the crew can sometimes be seen
milling about in the background, performing sundry duties such as
setting up gear or operating the clapboard.

In every testimony, Hagopian can be heard giving direction, either to
his crew or the interviewees. Himself a child survivor of the Armenian
Genocide, Hagopian – who died in 2010 at age 97 – asks his subjects to
retell certain stories, sometimes over and over, in an effort to say,
in the most succinct way, what they actually saw with their own eyes.
Similar to a lawyer obtaining factual detail for a legal deposition,
he wanted to know the “who, what, when, where and how” of the
survivor’s eyewitness experience. If a survivor said, “They did it,”
Hagopian would ask, “Who? Who did it?”

“Michael Hagopian generously gave us full access to his film dailies,
which is akin to a diary in that they normally wouldn’t be seen by the
public,” said Hrag Yedalian, a program coordinator with the Institute.
“This lends a certain candor to these interviews, which are at times
unsettling to watch, but poignant.”

Like all the testimonies in the Visual History Archive, these will be
searchable to the minute thanks to a team of indexers who tag
specially created indexing terms to a digital time code. The
distinctive nature of this collection has raised some indexing
challenges.

For instance, all too often, Armenians were rescued from the death
marches by self-interested parties who wanted to use them for slave
labor. This raised a question: Should this type of situation be tied
to the indexing term “rescue” — which is widely used in the Visual
History Archive’s Holocaust and other genocide testimonies – or
something else?

Similarly, in a tragic theme that played out during the Armenian
atrocities, desperate mothers often tried to give away their children
in a last-ditch attempt to ensure their survival. The families that
took them in could be abusive or exploitive. What term should be used
to describe a phenomenon that falls in the gray zone between adoption
and kidnapping?

Working closely with Hovannisian, indexers expect this collection will
necessitate adding as many as 300 new search terms to the 62,000
already in the Archive.

“While the patterns of mass violence during this period are sadly
familiar, there are certain characteristics unique to this history
that can be captured and brought to light with the creation of new
terms,” said Crispin Brooks, curator of the Institute’s Archive.

To highlight the distinctness of the Armenian testimonies, USC Shoah
Foundation is releasing two advance clips on its website at
One features Mihran Andonian, who was just a boy when
his family was deported from Isparta in western Turkey in 1916. By his
telling, in a matter of days, a death march of Armenians led by Turks
would reduce his extended family of 11 to three: his mother, his
sister, himself. The others died.

Like all of the testimonies in this collection, Andonian’s account is
prompted by the clap of the slate-board. In this particular testimony,
the interview starts with a sound recording before the camera records
actual picture. Hagopian can be heard giving direction and talking
film jargon with crew members.

The other features Haroutune Aivazian, who said that his family’s
vineyard was confiscated by the authorities at the time. Aivazian
survived because his mother dropped him off at a German orphanage
built by missionaries to shelter kids whose parents perished in the
Hamidian and Adana massacres of the late 19th and early 20th
centuries, respectively, killing between 100,000 and 350,000 people.

This testimony begins with a slow, dramatic pan of the camera from
left to right. Here, too, Hagopian asks Aivazian to tell his story –
the story he told Hagopian in the pre-interview process.

“Even those of us who did survive, we lost something very precious,”
Aivazian said. “Something which is the birthright of every person:
childhood. We lost our childhood.”

The testimonies have served as primary source material for Hagopian’s
documentaries about the Armenian Genocide, including “The Forgotten
Genocide” – recipient of two Emmy nominations in 1976 – and the
Witnesses Trilogy (“Voices from the Lake;” “Germany and the Secret
Genocide;” and “The River Ran Red”).

“He understood the importance of recording the testimonies of aging
eyewitnesses before their accounts were lost forever,” said Carla
Garapedian of the Armenian Film Foundation. “We are gratified to see
this collection included in one of the world’s most extensive and
respected video archives. The voices of the people haunted by these
atrocities will now be accessible to teachers, students, scholars and
the general public on a global scale.”

From: A. Papazian

http://asbarez.com/130340/usc-shoah-foundation-to-add-testimonies-from-armenian-genocide-survivors/
www.sfi.usc.edu.

The Oppressed Nations and National Strength

The Oppressed Nations and National Strength

By MassisPost
Updated: December 31, 2014

Vartan Derad

Mr. Derad, born in historic Armenia in September 7, 1900, at the age
of thirteen immigrated to the United States where he furthered his
education and attended the Emerson college of Oratory in Boston and
the Boston University Law School, where he earned his Juris Doctorate.

Mr. Derad became an active leader and public speaker, also editor of
Armenian newspapers, first in the New England area and then in
Southern California. He authored many books and contributed numerous
articles to various English papers. In the political field, he had
managed many local elections, having spoken from the same platform
with many prominent candidates for office, such as Thomas E. Dewey
former New York State Governor and Jasper McLevy, former famed Mayor
of Bridgeport, Connecticut, among others. Mr. Derad held responsible
positions in the Armenian Church structure and for four years served
as secretary to the Armenian Church of America. He was an ardent
member of the Social Democrat Hunchak Party, maintaining various high
level positions of Party in the East as well as the West coast of the
United States. He had also been a devoted student of economics and
political science and a close follower of world affairs. Mr. Derad
passed away in 1971.

Tomorrow’s Horizon, written in the midst of World War II, was Mr.
Derad’s analyses of the depths of the national and international,
economic, political and social problems which caused the war, and was
an aim to demonstrate the logical beginning for a world-wide union of
nations (a United Nations) and to peacefully avoid future conflicts. A
beginning where the belief that real democracy, personal liberty,
individual rights and political independence can survive and make the
machinery of a government function as the servant of the people,
instead of being the master over the people that constitutes the
nation.

With 2015 marking the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide as
well as the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, Mr. Derad’s
analysis of world affairs, primarily questions in dealing with small
nations and remembering and learning from historical political
blunders made by “BIG” powers, resonates in today’s world. MassisPost,
therefore presents a chapter entitled The Oppressed Nations and
National Strength from Mr. Derad’s book Tomorrow’s Horizon.

S.K.

The Oppressed Nations and National Strength

We are not going to let history of the oppressed nations repeat
itself. The liberation of oppressed peoples is constantly proclaimed
during the more chivalrous phases of the war. The United Nations who
will hold the future destinies of the small, conquered and enslaved
nations on the peace table must refrain from further political
sleights.

The democracies will and should have the right to demand an accounting
of the statesmen into whose hands the labor and agonies of millions of
men placed free disposition over the fortunes of conquered nations.
The economic aspirations of the international financiers must cease to
exist in order that the fire of independent nationalism will not burn
out in international intrigues and again be forgotten forever as it
happened in Versailles after the first World War.

It is very important to have foresight and not hindsight when the
question comes to deal with small nations and remember one of the past
political blunders as the poor Armenians were treated after one
million Armenian men, women and children were brutally massacred, and
tens of thousands of women and girls were carried off into the most
abominable slavery. Two hundred thousand Armenians of military age,
who might have helped to defend the frontier of a real Armenian state,
were unhappily slain and the history tells us how the main cause of
Armenia’s woes were the torturous and immoral diplomacy of Europe.

The pioneers of democracy and Christianity failed to understand the
cynical treatment which Armenia did have at the hands of the foreign
offices of the European Powers. The chief obstacle which Armenia had
to encounter in winning for itself “a place in the sun” had lain in
the fact that its legitimate boundaries had conflicted with the
boundaries of the zones with which the Allied Powers had
checker-boarded Asia Minor.

The Allies hesitated to talk too much about Armenian independence
while Romanoff Russia was in the war and when imperial Russia vanished
from the horizon, there was no good reason why the Allies should not
then have recognized the independence of those Armenians who hitherto
had lived under Russia and forgetting Turkey who still was the “sick
man of Europe.”

Yes, the reason was very obvious. Downing Street and Quai O’Orsai were
flirting with Deniken at the time, and Denikin, who desired a “great,
inseparable Russia,” would have none of an independent Armenia. And
why?

Because the British wanted Armenia’s Black Sea and Caspian gate which
might link her up with the rest of the world; the French wanted her
promised outlet to the Mediterranean on the south. More than that, the
Arxes valley and the mineral wealth of the Karabakh mountains the
British foreign office preferred to vest in the hands of the nomad
Moslems, who in all probability, would shortly come under British
influence and custodianship.

The historical truth remains that the Powers of Europe were only
interested in Armenia and the poor Armenians to the extent of how much
and in what ways and means they would have benefitted if they had made
an approach to this land and the lands of other small nations who
suffered and sacrificed, who bled and died in order that the BIG
powers and wealthy lords live and be happy.

History never recorded such a betrayal as that of Armenia, whose body
was crucified by the Turks and whose faith was destroyed by the BIG
POWERS after the first World War.

The great need of the world today and after this war is leadership and
there can be no higher tribute to international unselfishness and
kindness than the fact that every nation in the world is willing to
accept the proposals and just dealings of such a leadership. Let us
not cause the downfall of democracy by a provincial, distrustful and
disunited play and overthrow the civilization in the hands of greedy,
selfish money mongers and demagogues.

Anthony Eden, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, in his
July (1942) speech said a number of things that also should serve as
inspiration during and after trying periods ahead for the United
Nations. Note the following: “Let there be no doubt in the minds of
our enemies. Whether the struggle be long or short,’ we, together with
our allies, are in this war to the victorious end. No temporary
setback or disappointment or even lost battles can alter our
resolution to continue the fight against the dictator powers until
they are all finally disarmed and rendered powerless to do further
injury to mankind…

“We must either build an orderly, law-abiding international society in
which each nation lives and works freely without fear or favor or we
shall be destroyed in a welter of barbaric strife…”

Now we have come to the point where the free thinkers in every nation
must express himself in terms of internationalism, because the spirit
of nationalism now in effect forces each nation to watch every other
with suspicion, jealousy or menace. And what has been the result?

“Honor and vital interests of our nation,” exclaims the blood-thirsty
politician or the industrialist of each and opposing nation, “are in
danger. We must fight … carryon the war … war is human.” Then the poor
dupes begin to butcher one another at the word of command from higher
up. The schools that hold the future generation of mankind, become not
only the training ground, but actually a recruiting ground for the
army with the spirit of severe nationalism.

The motto of the school of “my country, right or wrong,” is no longer
a practical menu that can be served on the desks of our school
children. “My country, right or wrong,” is but the highest degree of
egotism, in common with the name HITLERISM. Had this been the motto of
General Washington and his compatriots the United States would still
be a part of the British Empire.

History proves and the events testify, that in the name of NATIONALISM
and without the spirit of internationalism we always have had wars,
butchering of brothers by brothers. A torrent of blood has flown from
the deep, damned war-wound in the breast of the working class. When
war is declared, the command is given immediately “Kill! Slay!
Slaughter! Plunder! Destroy! Rape! and crucify in the name of
NATIONALISM.”

Robert G. Ingersoll once wrote about the agonies of war, created by
the fire of stupid nationalism, combined with the greed of
international industrialists or war-mongers:

“Nations sustain the relations of savage to each other …no man has
imagination enough to paint the agonies, the horrors, the cruelties,
of war. Think of sending shot and shell crashing through the bodies of
men. Think of the widows and orphans! Think of the maimed, the
mutilated, the mangled …”

Narrow and shortsighted nationalism made the Turks massacre the
Armenians during the World War I, but in 1942, this time the turn was
shifted to the helpless Greeks. In “Life” magazine, August 3, 1942,
issue, there appeared some heartbreaking photographs of dying Greeks,
showing how the famine and death rode into Greece at the heels of the
Nazi conquest. These pictures were collected and privately printed in
April with the legend SECRET-NOT FOR PUBLICATION, by exiled Greek
Minister of Information, A. Michalopoulos.

The Germans came to Greece as conquerors. They picked it clean as a
bone and then announced that the Third German Reich has no
responsibility for the feeding of such conquered nations as Greece.

The last state of Greece was described as follows by Associated Press
Correspondent, Richard G. Massock:

“Stinking, ragged columns of men, women and children, who no longer
wash now that there is no soap, pick over the garbage of the Germans
and Italians. The poor lie in squalid homes, too weak to move, their
swollen bodies covered with sores. In processions, the Athenians go to
the city dumps. When one finds a sardine or other food can, he cleans
the inside with his tongue as a cat would do. The hospitals are
over-crowded, sometimes with three or four starving patients in a bed.
The courtyards of the morgues are filled with naked bodies. Three
hundred bodies at a time are buried in large pits, without lime.

“When people die, relatives place the corpses in the gutters without
reporting the deaths so that they won’t have to surrender the bread
cards of the deceased. The tragedy of Greece is not so much the dead
picked up in the streets each morning, as the famine and condemnation
to death reflected in the faces of those dragging their starved bodies
through the streets.”

As to what a terrible war is doing to an innocent, unarmed and
guiltless civilian people at their own homes, on their own city or
country streets, here the report about Greece carries on its tale in
more details in the same issue of “Life” magazine as how the Greeks
had expected to go hungry, but the Germans killed their cattle and
took their milk for the occupying German armed forces. They took their
boats so that they could not even fish. When an occasional wheat boat
arrived from Sweden, Switzerland, Canada, Turkey, they claimed that it
was German wheat and confiscated more Greek food supplies.

The International Red Cross continued the report, fed about 700,000
people in Athens a daily bowlful of olive oil, rice and dried
vegetables. The price of bread was $4 a pound, butter $18, oil $12,
coffee $50, eggs 75c apiece and shoes $100 a pair.

Here is another heart-breaking report, when we are told how people
steal and kill for food, husbands abandon wives and children. Citizens
lie across the pavements, spitting blood into the gutter. A certain
sort of thud means that somebody else has fallen to the pavement. The
survivors do not look around.

There are many more bad, inhuman, uncivilized conditions caused by the
war under and at the point of the brutal warriors. Thus a war is a
plague that afflicts many nations and humanity. It destroys families,
kills everyone who raises his or her head in the name of patriotism.
In war, even God is forgotten because the churches are bombed and the
priests are brutally killed in the churchyards.

In Secretary of State Cordell Hull’s address on July 23, 1942, on the
war situation he said: “Governments can and must help to focus the
energies by encouraging, coordinating and aiding the efforts of
individuals and groups.”

Of course this “helping” philosophy will be put into action only and
when the governments, besides being willing to help, also get the
cooperation of so-called leading industrial individuals in their own
respective .lands. These individuals particularly who are in economic
power and have the means of dictating and in many cases, commanding
the legislative bodies to do certain things not for the benefit of all
the citizens, but for the benefit of the leading lords only. The
governments in this case should command these industrial lords to lay
down their selfish and money making weapons and extend their hands to
the rank and file of the people united as one man without any
expectation, ready to help the government direct the national 7efforts
to the creation of a lasting peace and preserving the same.

Secretary Hull continues: “In our own country we have learned from
bitter experience that to be truly free, men must have as well,
economic freedom and economic security, the assurance for all alike of
an opportunity to work as free men in the company of free men; to
obtain through work the material and spiritual means of life; to
advance through the exercise of ability, initiative and enterprise; to
make provision against the hazards and human existence.”

History shows us that no nation can enjoy its national peace while its
citizens are in the grip of constant fear of economic depression,
unemployment, bitter class struggle, strikes and what not.
A free nation will be able to contribute its worthy share to the
freedom of the world and to the people of this world when the citizens
of this nation are free first, free economically, politically and
socially. Free from shallow nationalism and baptized with the spirit
of internationalism.

Secretary Hull carries on his speech and says: “One of the greatest
obstacles which in the past have impeded human progress and afforded
breeding grounds for dictators has been extreme nationalism.

“All will agree that nationalism and its spirit are essential to the
healthy and normal political and economic life of a people, but when
policies of nationalism, political, economic, social and moral, are
carried to such extremes as to exclude and prevent necessary policies
of international cooperation, they become dangerous and deadly.

“Nationalism, running riot between the last war and this war, defeated
all attempts to carry our indispensable measures of international
economic and political action, encouraged and facilitated the rise of
dictators and drove the world straight toward the present war.

“During this period, narrow and shortsighted nationalism found its
most virulent expression in the economic field.

“It prevented goods and services from flowing in volume at all
adequate from nation to nation and thus severely hampered the work of
production, distribution and consumption and greatly retarded efforts
for social betterment.

“No nation can make satisfactory progress when it is deprived, by its
own action or by the action of others, of the immeasurable benefits of
international exchange of goods and services.”

The biggest and most cruel thing in the world is WAR and the way it is
conducted. The fundamental reason for war is the constant struggle
against want, and all its concomitants. Hence modern wars are
essentially wars for foreign markets for the benefit of the ruling
class or for the selfish greed of the stronger nation, which often
leads to the destruction of a former powerful industrial nation, or
nations, and as a result of that all nations during peace time if
there has ever been a peace time, will live in the shadow of
threatened coercion of war, in the shadow of fear that someday the
other nation will get stronger and strike a deadly blow.

From: A. Papazian

http://massispost.com/2014/12/the-oppressed-nations-and-national-strength/

Commémoration de l’assassinat de Hrant Dink au Parlement européen

Europe
Commémoration de l’assassinat de Hrant Dink au Parlement européen

21 janvier 2015 commémoration de l’assassinat de Hrant Dink au
Parlement européen

Son assassinat a été l’aboutissement d’une campagne de dix années de
harcèlement par les autorités du pays, par l’armée et par des groupes
extrémistes. Mais il a déclenché une vague de solidarité sans
précédent et d’activisme pro-démocratie en Turquie, après plus que 100
000 personnes aient assisté à ses funérailles.

Aujourd’hui, Dink est devenu une icône du mouvement pour les libertés
civiles en Turquie et en Europe. Sa mémoire est comme un phare pour
les intellectuels, activistes et un public plus large pour combattre
les préjugés et le nationalisme intolérant. Hrant Dink était un
Arménien, dans un pays où les Arméniens ont longtemps vécu dans la
peur. Il était un journaliste, dans un pays où, plus que jamais, les
journalistes libres penseurs sont soumis à des pressions et des
persécutions. Et en tant que défenseur de la paix, il a été vilipendé
par les nationalistes.

Après sa mort, la famille et les amis de Dink ont établi une fondation
qui a depuis poursuivi et élargi son travail en Turquie pour les
libertés civiles, des droits des minorités et des relations pacifiques
avec ses voisins, en particulier l’Arménie.

2015 marquera le 10e anniversaire du début des négociations d’adhésion
de la Turquie et le centenaire du début du génocide arménien. La
commémoration le 21 Janvier sera l’occasion d’évoquer l’héritage
intellectuel et politique de Hrant Dink, et de faire le point sur la
situation du mouvement pour les droits civiques et la tolérance que
son assassinat a aidé à démarrer.

Le 19 janvier, jour anniversaire de l’assassinat du journaliste
turco-arménien, le président Erdogan présidera pour la première fois
un conseil des ministrs depuis son accession au pouvoir.

mercredi 31 décembre 2014,
Jean Eckian (c)armenews.com

From: A. Papazian

http://www.armenews.com/article.php3?id_article=106561

Environmentalists About Achievements And Failures For 2014, As Well

ENVIRONMENTALISTS ABOUT ACHIEVEMENTS AND FAILURES FOR 2014, AS WELL AS EXPECTATIONS FROM 2015

16:13 December 29, 2014

EcoLur

How the environmental public assesses 2014 and what are their
expectations from 2015?

EcoLur had an interview with Silva Adamyan, Chairman of “Center
for Bird Lovers” NGO, Arsen Gasparyan – Chairman of “Association
of Young Biologists” NGO and Levon Galstyan, member of Pan-Armenian
Environmental Front.

The main achievements for 2014 outlined by Silva Adamyan are as
follows:

· The unprecedented decision of Nature Protection Ministry to issue
a negative opinion to Tukhmanuk mining project,

· Reduction of time period of additional water outlets from Lake
Sevan – from 5 years to 1 year,

· Mitigation of wolf-humans conflict.

The main achievement for 2014 outlined by Arsen Gasparyan is the
appointment of a new Nature Protection Minister. In his opinion,
the primary issues are connected with mining and EIA process. “I
can bring the example of Meghrasar mine, where the mine is located
in a specially protected area of nature, but the project EIA doesn’t
say anything about it. I hope in 2015 more serious approach will be
demonstrated in this regard,” Arsen Gasparyan outlined.

Environmentalist Levon Gasparyan thinks the only positive event in
2014 was saving 700 million cum water from the water resources in
Ararat Valley by Nature Protection Ministry, which gives up hopes
that the balance of the artesian basin will be recovered.

From: A. Papazian

http://ecolur.org/en/news/mining/environmentalists-about-achievements-and-failures-for-2014-as-well-as-expectations-from-2015/6924/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YP00Q7kUbAw

3% Consumer Price Rise In Armenia In December 2014

3% CONSUMER PRICE RISE IN ARMENIA IN DECEMBER 2014

YEREVAN, December 30. /ARKA/. Consumer prices in Armenia rose 3%
in December 2014, compared with the previous month, the National
Statistical Service of Armenia reports. Foods leapt 5.1%, nonfoods 0.2%
and services 0.7% in December. According to the statistical report,
the consumer price year-on-year index was 104.6% in December 2014,
the food price index (including spirits and tobacco products) was
106.3%, nonfoods 101.6%, services 103% In the government budget for
2014, inflation is projected at 4% (±1.5%). —0—-

From: A. Papazian

http://arka.am/en/news/economy/3_consumer_price_rise_in_armenia_in_december_2014/#sthash.nmyDqpYM.dpuf

Armenia Is More Fragile Than Georgia And Azerbaijan

ARMENIA IS MORE FRAGILE THAN GEORGIA AND AZERBAIJAN

December 29, 2014 16:36

Photo:

Yerevan /Mediamax/. Armenia ranks the
104th in Fragile States Index Ranking
2014.

With a total score of 71.3 Armenia has been involved among countries
where the authorities’ ability to manage the situation “sends a
high warning”.

In 2013, Armenia came in 105th place in the
ranking.

Georgia came in the 63rd place, Azerbaijan – in the 76th, Turkey in
the 93rd and Iran – in the 44th. Russia ranked the 85th.

The annual Fragile States Index is produced by The Fund for Peace
and Foreign Policy magazine.

The ranking named Finland the most stable country and South Sudan –
the most fragile.

The producers of the ranking guide themselves by various criteria –
the economic state, crime rate, commitment to the implementation of
the law, human rights protection, etc.

The data are obtained from open sources.

– See more at:

From: A. Papazian

http://library.fundforpeace.org
http://library.fundforpeace.org/library/cfsir1423-fragilestatesindex2014-06d.pdf
http://ffp.statesindex.org/rankings-2013-sortable
http://www.mediamax.am/en/news/society/12763/#sthash.LxfVqDab.dpuf

Karabakh Court Passed Sentence On Azerbaijani Saboteurs

KARABAKH COURT PASSED SENTENCE ON AZERBAIJANI SABOTEURS

17:54, 29.12.2014

STEPANAKERT. – The trial on the criminal case into Azerbaijani
saboteurs Dilham Askerov and Shahbaz Guliyev is over.

The court sentenced Dilham Askerov to life imprisonment and Shahbaz
Guliyev to 22 years in jail during the hearings on Monday, Artsakhpress
reported.

According to the NKR Police, Azerbaijani citizens Shahbaz Guliyev
(born in 1968), Dilham Askerov (born in 1960), and Hasan Hasanov–who
was killed by the Armenian armed forces while rendering the saboteurs
ineffective–illegally crossed the state border of Karabakh on June
29, and they were armed with weapons and ammunition. The three entered
the territory of the Shahumyan region of Karabakh as spies to collect
information and carry out espionage.

On July 4, they kidnapped and subsequently murdered a Karabakh citizen,
17-year-old Smbat Tsakanyan, whose body was found on July 15 with
gunshot wounds in a forest at Shahumyan region.

In addition, on the evening of July 11, Hasanov killed Armenia capital
city Yerevan resident Sargis Abrahamyan (born in 1971), and severely
wounded Armenia’s Dzoraghbyur village resident Karine Davtyan, on the
Vardenis-Karvachar Highway. Hasanov was armed and he resisted during
the arrest; as a result, he was neutralized by the NKR special forces.

The two others, Shahbaz Guliyev and Dilham Askerov, were detained,
and they now stand trial in the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

Armenia News – NEWS.am

From: A. Papazian

A Silent Christmas Celebration: Anatolian Christians

A SILENT CHRISTMAS CELEBRATION: ANATOLIAN CHRISTIANS

Vartan Estukyan 12.24.2014 22:24NEWS

Christmas is celebrated with great joy and excitement by billions of
Christians, and in recent times, has also become a visual spectacle.

The Christmas spirit reveals itself in the intense activity during
festive season, but it obviously does not mean anything special in
countries where Islam is the predominant religion. The situation in
Turkey is slightly different. After all, this is a country that has
been home to both Christians and Muslims in the past and today.

Although today the state would have us believe that 99% of the
country’s population is made up of Muslims, Christmas is still
celebrated in Turkey, and besides, at two separate dates. The first,
as in the most of the Christian world, is December 24-25, and the other
is January 6, on which Apostolic Armenians celebrate Surp Dzınunt,
and the Orthodox world celebrates the baptism of Jesus Christ. We
wanted to find out how the now very few Anatolian Christians spend
Christmas, and asked our questions to residents of different cities.

Sivas: Indoors celebration in winter country

Once the majority population of the city, the few remaining Armenian
families of Sivas come together to celebrate New Year. Since the city
is covered in snow at this time of the year, the Sivas Armenians have a
very colourful time during Christmas and New Year. Yervant Durmazguler,
one of the few Armenians who continue to reside in Sivas, explains:
“Here we have very colourful New Year and Surp Dzınunt celebrations,
since the dates are close, the preparations for both days are done
together. We often have a white New Year, and the celebrations are
held indoors, with family and friends.”

A rich table for New Year

Durmazguler also mentions the diversity of New Year and Christmas
table: “The turkey is sent to the bakery’s oven in the neighbourhood,
and the stuffed turkey with seasoned rice form the centrepiece of a
great New Year and Christmas dinner table. On the evening of December
31, a special dessert, similar to ashura, but which contains coarse
wheat, grape molasses and yellow grapes, and is called ‘gorgit’ is
made. Preparation for Dzınunt, which is on January 6, begins one or
two days before. Trotters soup, stuffed leaves and pastry desserts
are the highlights of the Dzınunt dinner table.”

Christmas Greeting from Official Authorities

Durmazguler then explains the importance of celebrating Christmas in
Anatolia: “In Anatolia’s warm and sincere environment, we share both
our joy and sorrow, and connect to each other with strong ties. Our
Muslim neighbours are also aware of the fact that Christmas is a
special day for us, and always come to greet us. In recent years,
besides our neighbours, the Governor, Mayor and Police Chief have also
visited us at our homes and presented their greetings for Christmas.”

Diyarbakır: Dzınunt at the Syriac Church

Diyarbakır is another city that had a large Armenian population
in the past, and both Christmas and New Year are celebrated with
great joy and excitement. However, since not many Armenians live in
Diyarbakır anymore, the celebrations are held at the Syriac Ancient
Virgin Mary Church. Let us lend an ear to Melike Dara Gunal, as she
tells us about Christmas and New Year celebrations in Diyarbakır:
“We have no religious official at the Surp Giragos Armenian Church, so
we can’t hold mass. That’s why we often take part in mass at the Syriac
Ancient Virgin Mary Church. Or for a more entertaining and crowded
festival, we go to Mardin. Since there are no Armenian religious
officials in the region, many of our traditions have commingled
with those of our brother Syriac people. For instance, celebrating
Christmas on December 25 rather than January 6… It is pretty much
the same as everywhere else in the country. And people are prejudiced,
since they don’t know the difference between Christmas and New Year.”

‘They think New Year and Christmas is the same thing’

Gunal explains that many people in Diyarbakır think that New Year
and Christmas is the same thing, and are surprised when they find out
that they are, in fact, separate days: “They think it’s the same day,
so many conservative Muslims are against celebrating this Christian
tradition. It is worth seeing their surprise when they find out that
Christmas is actually on December 25. Some even think they have missed
out on New Year celebrations for nothing, because others have told
them it is a Christian tradition.”

Wine: The centrepiece of Christmas tables

Melike Dara Gunal tells us that in addition to turkey, that is
synonymous with Christmas, the special dishes of the city such as
kaburga [spare ribs] and tas kebabı [lamb stew] also feature on
Armenian dinner tables in Diyarbakır. Gunal adds that wine and meze
are the indispensable centrepieces of Christmas and New Year tables
for the Christians of Diyarbakır.

Gunal states that, following the renovation of the Surp Giragos
Church, New Year celebrations have been held at Church for the past
two years, but there are those who prefer to celebrate this special
day at home: “For me, it is special to celebrate this day together
with our Syriac sisters and brothers, although our New Year is on
January 6… However, there are many Islamised Armenians who do
not observe this tradition… Christmas is another matter, there
are very few Christian Armenians in Diyarbakır, so there is no
mass celebration. But we have gathered for the last two years and
celebrated together.”

Mersin: Arab Christians celebrate Christmas together

There is a small Arab Christian community in Mersin, who of course
celebrates Christmas. Religious official İspir CoÅ~_kun Teymur,
also known as Priest Spiro, of the Mersin Greek Orthodox Church,
told us about the atmosphere in Mersin during Christmas and New Year:
“Families keep religious traditions alive within the household. We
perform Christmas mass at our Church with our entire congregation
in Mersin. On the second day of Christmas, we organize a Christmas
Ball in a hall. At Christmas and New Year, families prepare menus
formed of dishes unique to our community and the region. These often
include meatballs with stuffing, stuffed turkey and various grilled
meat dishes.”

The city also observes Christmas

Teymur adds that the people of Mersin are aware of the importance
of Christmas for Christians, and that district municipalities hang
up Christmas lights along the main streets for the festive period:
“In addition to the main streets, large stores and workplaces also
hang up Christmas decorations. There is clearly a different atmosphere
compared to the rest of the year.”

Mardin’s ‘Pifkana hane’: the clown in town…

Mardin, where there is a large Syriac Christian community, is a
city where Christmas is celebrated with great excitement. Ferit
Altınsu tells us that everyone goes to church early on December
25 and explains the atmosphere in Midyat as follows: “As people
flow out of church, the first greetings are presented among the
community. Then people take their place in the church hall, and the
men, the bishop, the priest and all the other religious clergy sit
for a while to congratulate each other. Then people return home,
and greet their family members. Often, after church, a main course
featuring a meat dish is eaten rather than breakfast, then house
visits begin. Children and youngsters form groups to visit houses
and to celebrate the Christmas festival of the families in town.”

Altınsu tells us that New Year celebrations are very colourful, and
that they also have a figure known as ‘pifkana hane’, who is similar
to the modern-day clown, who displays certain performances on December
31: “There aren’t many left today, but the performers we call ‘pifkana
hane’ and are similar to clowns, form groups of two and visit people’s
homes on New Year’s Eve, and entertain the children with various
short sketches. In return, they would collect some dried and fresh
fruit from these households, and then distribute them to the needy.”

From: A. Papazian

http://www.agos.com.tr/en/article/10063/a-silent-christmas-celebration-anatolian-christians