Armenia receives shipment of French armored vehicles through Georgia

eurasianet
Nov 16 2023
Heydar Isayev Nov 16, 2023

Armenia has received its first batch of armored vehicles from France via Georgia. 

Azerbaijan is ratcheting up its rhetoric against France over Paris' growing military support to its archrival but so far has refrained from criticizing Georgia for facilitating the first delivery of French hardware.

On November 12, Azerbaijani Defense Ministry-aligned Caliber.az shared images purporting to show at least 20 Bastion armored personnel carriers arriving at the Poti Port, on Georgia's Black Sea coast. 

APM Terminals, which operates the Poti Port, meanwhile, confirmed on November 14 that a "specific cargo" was received from France and sent on to Armenia. "In the absence of clear instructions [to the contrary] from the Georgian government and any restrictions from international regulators, APM Terminals Poti, as a multipurpose port in Georgia and the region, had no right to reject without basis a cargo that is not under sanctions," the company told RFE/RL.

Georgian Foreign Minister Ilia Darchiashvili gave his own confirmation of the arms transit in an interview with Georgian Public TV on November 14. 

He referred to Armenia and Azerbaijan as both "brotherly and friendly" nations and said that both have the right to use Georgian territory for transit "on equal terms." 

"All countries have the right to have defense forces and all countries have the right to acquire conventional hardware and weapons permitted under international agreements. Georgia's position is that both countries should be allowed to use our country for transit."

Armenia's Defense Ministry, for its part, neither confirmed nor denied the transfer of the vehicles. 

Georgia's role in the arms transfer was noted in both Armenia and Azerbaijan, but not at the official level. 

"What is most important is that Georgia is not hindering the logistics, despite [Azerbaijani President Ilham] Aliyev's attempts to put pressure on Tbilisi," Leonid Nersisyan, Armenian military analyst, wrote on X. 

An editorial on Minval.az, a pro-Azerbaijani government analysis website, called the transfer a "stab in the back" by Georgia against its strategic partner Azerbaijan. The commentary said that Azerbaijani energy supplies, as well as pipelines carrying Azerbaijani oil and gas through Georgia, were crucial to Georgia's security and economic well-being, and lamented that now, the leadership in Tbilisi has "chosen to curry favor with France at the expense of Azerbaijan's interests."

Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry, meanwhile, condemned France over the hardware transfer but made no mention of Georgia. 

"Against the backdrop of smearing campaigns and destructive actions by France against Azerbaijan in the region, these steps, which adds to the militarization policy of Armenia, attests to the fact of France's erroneous interests in the region," the English version of the statement read. "Armenia and France should end armament and militarization policy in the region, and finally understand that there is no alternative to peace and stability in the region."

The Armenian and French defense ministers signed deals on October 23 under which Armenia will purchase radar systems and other equipment, including anti-aircraft systems, from French manufacturers, and France will help train and reform the Armenian armed forces. 

"France and the French people are by our side, a fact that deserves our highest appreciation," Armenian Defense Minister Suren Papikyan said at the signing of the deal.

The delivery of French APCs was not mentioned in initial official statements about that deal.

Azerbaijan has long been critical of France over its pro-Armenian stance in the Karabakh conflict, especially during the peace process that followed the 2020 war between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Now that Azerbaijan largely resolved the Karabakh conflict in its own favor, it still opposes France's involvement in the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace negotiations as a mediator. 

In early October, President Aliyev refused to attend a meeting in Spain where he was scheduled to meet the Armenian Prime Minister, citing the exclusion of Turkey, Azerbaijan's closest ally, from the would-be multilateral talks, and the inclusion of France. 

Azerbaijan has recently begun using its chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) to position itself as a global leader in the fight against what it calls French "neocolonialism."

Baku recently hosted a neocolonialism conference that featured invitees from independence movements in New Caledonia, Corsica, French Polynesia and French Guiana. 

Hikmat Hajiyev, Aliyev's senior foreign policy advisor, told the conference that Azerbaijan will help French overseas territories to continue with their "struggle, and political freedom ambitions."

"We will raise the opinions expressed here at the level of the UN and other international organizations. Our country was deprived of independence for many years. As a state, we know what occupation is," he said. 

Heydar Isayev is a journalist from Baku.

2023 Haigazian Armenological Review published

Haigazian University is pleased to announce that the first book of Haigazian Armenological Review for the year 2023, namely book 43/1, has been published.

In its 520 pages, alongside the editorial (included below) entitled “What the Diaspora Armenians Lack: The Role and Influence of the Armenian Scholar,” the book hosts a number of research papers pertaining to arts, folklore, literary criticism, church matters, sociology, linguistics and history, as well as an unpublished document, two briefings and two book reviews.

Launched in 1970, the Haigazian Armenological Review is published by the Armenian Department of Haigazian University. As of 2022, this annual publication is being published semiannually.

Haigazian Armenological Review book 43/1 features the following content:

Lusine Sahakyan, Current Issues of Komitas Studies
Robert Megerdichian, Abraham Megerdichian, Eemin shinadz panerus  (The Things I’ve Made)
Antranik Dakessian, A Survey of the Armenian Copper Bath Tass used for Clay
Galya Davidova, Remembering and Reviving Armenian Wedding Ceremonies and Marriage Symbols
Armen Sargsyan, Armenian Popular/Folk Cock-and-bull Stories
Karine Rafaelyan, The Exchanging of Material and Abstract Worlds in Hrachya Saribekyan’s Novels Yergvoryagneri Areve (The Twins’ Sun) and Abushneri Ooghevorutyune (The Idiots’ Journey)
Liza Karimian, Anti-Chalcedonism in Armenia in the Early 6th Century: The Confessional Orientation of the Dvin Council in 506
Samvel Khachatryan, An Examination of the Intersection of Populism and Democracy: The Case of Armenia
Mary Alik Karamanoukian, Diaspora in Armenia: Immigration and Political Integration of Syrian Armenians
Syuzanna Barseghyan, Diaspora Newspapers in the Context of Ethnic Media
Lusine Tanajyan, Some Peculiarities in the Religious Attitude of the Armenian Communities of Los Angeles and Tehran
Herant Katchadourian, Culture and Psychopathology: The Case of the Armenian Village of Anjar
Zaven Messerlian, Consciousness Matters: The Armenian Genocide Within Turkey
Anjela Amirkhanyan, Compound Names of Plants with the Rootword ‘Wolf’
Hagop Cholakian, A General Observation of Plant Names in the Dialect of Kessab
Mohammad MalekMohammadi, Armenian-Arabic Language Contacts and Armenian Words of Arabic Origin
Lalik Khatchatryan, The Transformation of Old Armenian Analytical Constructions into Compound Words with a Pattern Noun+Verb > Verb (Dyachronic Aspect)
Hayk Nazaryan, The Development of the Armenian Air Defence Forces between the May 1994 Armistice and the Military Actions of April 2016  (Part 2)
Seda Galstyan, Pages from the Archive of Anton Kochinyan (1966-74)
Vahram L. Shemmassian, The Saint Paul Capuchin Mission in Musa Dagh, 1919-39
Vazgen Hakhoyan, The Turkish Massacres in the Province of Alexandropol in 1920-21
Karen Mkrtchyan, Raffi’s Historical Articles in Meshag between 1872 and 1878 on the Armenian Community of Iran
Mihran A. Minasian, An Unpublished Report of 1900 on Denek Maden (Kesgin)
Elina Mekhitaryan, The Critical Conditions of the Indigenous Population of Artsakh (An Observation on Refugee and Internally Displaced Groups)
Vahram Hovyan, Interconfessional Cooperation in Kessab during the Years of the Armenian Genocide

***
Editorial

What the Diaspora Armenians Lack: The Role and Influence of the Armenian Scholar

Non-doctrinal thinking, freedom of speech and action are moving forces for the development of any society. The scholar who voices the issues of their society in an objective way and struggles against cautious, conforming, fossilized understandings and mindsets is considered the forerunner of the development of that society.

With outstanding qualities, like critical thinking, courage, rigorous attitude, modesty, independence and broad-mindedness, such scholars commit themselves to the human and national value system and shape social culture through unbiased examinations of diverse issues of life.

In assessing social shortcomings and bygone initiatives of society in an objective and daring manner, the scholar intends to rectify and reduce the shortfalls, balance the disproportions, even to the extent of discomforting society and authorities.

The best evidence of what is said above is the Armenian revival in the 19th century, which had Armenian scholars as its main avant-guard. Emanating from different forums and places, they succeeded in elevating the Armenians from the darkness of the previous centuries.

Indeed, Armenian scholars played a pivotal role in cultivating the 19th century Armenian space. The integration of scholars and capitalists led to the thriving of Armenian culture. Most of the Western Armenian cultivators of this flourishing culture became victims of the Armenian Genocide.

The presence of scholars and a scholarly mindset in the decision-making bodies and leadership of the Diaspora between the 1920s and 1950s was significant. The leadership of the 1950s to the 1980s, which was shaped by the previous generation, maintained the road map of its predecessors to a certain extent. Nonetheless, the gradual decline of the role and place of scholars was also noticeable. 

The marginalization of scholars in the decision-making bodies of the late 20th century was obvious. Scholars lost their weight, role and place in those structures, leading to an imbalance that did not yield the expected steps to be taken against the increasingly challenging conditions of the Diaspora. Indeed, the value system had deteriorated, the national vision was lessened and the strategic output was reduced. 

For these and other reasons the Armenian Diaspora is fumbling in its undertakings to recreate its identity.

This is why the restoration of the role and place of the independent scholar is a must that should not to be postponed any longer. 

In fact, the scholars, grassroots and followers of Armenian Diaspora religious and lay institutions follow a specific guideline of their own. Therefore, these institutions neither separately nor combined can have a pan-Armenian nature, view or space for endeavor. Complementing the leadership of these two institutions with independent scholars may generate a new quality, which may offer a plurality of choices to a society facing numerous concerns. These independent scholars may suggest different approaches to form opinions, thus sanctioning pluralism in national issues and the opportunity to consider various options in taking a stance. This is how democracy, the most important factor for the development of a society, becomes rock-solid.

The problem does not lie in the absence of scholars. Rather, it is the absence of the impact and influence of scholars. It is not an issue of individuals, rather an issue of their high and effective voice. It is not the absence of individual research papers. Rather it is the failure of the acceptance-adoption and implementation of credible calls in shaping views and policies. It is not an issue of quick, superficial internet investigations. It is the issue of acquiring deep and piercing analyses, no matter what their source.

Offering places to scholars, who have a different say in the public sphere, is a basic pathway for generating such a condition. This will encourage the scholarly youth with an ingrained interest to voice their views. Eventually, a healthy atmosphere will come to life in society, which will penetrate to the schools, which should undergo radical educational reform, including critical thinking and free _expression_ as ingredients of the curriculum. This can be the first model of democracy for the scholar of tomorrow, who gets training in free _expression_ and listening to the other from his teens.

In due time these steps consolidate the culture of independent thinking, which revitalizes society for a better future.

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Antranik Dakessian

EDITORIAL BOARD
Silva Papazian, Arshalouyse Topalian, Armen Urneshlian

CONSULTATIVE BODY
Sylvia Agemian, Megerditch H. Bouldoukian, Seta Dadoyan, Arda Ekmekji, Murad Hasratian, Nanor Karageozian, Hranush Kharatian, Susan Pattie, Hratch Tchilingirian, Yervand Yerkanian

HAR REPRESENTATIVE IN ARMENIA
AMAA Yerevan Office




Azerbaijan says does not need another war with Armenia

Iran Front Page
Nov 9 2023

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has stated that his country does not need a new war with Armenia.

“We do not need a new war. We have achieved what we were striving for, we have restored international law, we have restored historical justice, we have restored our national dignity, we have shown the enemy his place,” he said at a military parade in the town of Khankendi in Nagorno-Karabakh on the occasion of the third anniversary of Azerbaijan’s victory in the Second Karabakh War.

According to Aliyev, all the country’s tasks have been fulfilled.

“But at the same time, the issue of building the army will remain one of the priority issues for us. Let everyone know this and do not forget it,” the Azerbaijani leader pointed out.

Azerbaijan has the situation on the border with Armenia under control, Aliyev stated.

“We knew that revanchist forces were raising their heads in Armenia [after the second Karabakh war]. We knew that the foreign forces behind Armenia who incite it to act against us would again send it provocative signals. Therefore, we needed to protect our border, and as a result of several military operations the situation on the Azerbaijani-Armenian border is now under our control,” he added.

“There will be no place for separatism in Azerbaijan anymore,” the president continued.

“Today the Azerbaijani government controls the entire territory of the country.”

Turkish Press: ‘Armenia still hasn’t handed over 8 villages to Azerbaijan’

Daily Sabah, Turkey
Nov 7 2023

Eight villages in liberated Karabakh are still under Armenian occupation, Azerbaijan's Foreign Ministry said Tuesday.

"Armenia chose the path of enduring to menace the peace process, lives of our citizens, restoration and reconstruction work carried out in the region … Armenia also refused to hand over eight Azerbaijani villages, which are still under occupation," said a statement by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry.

The statement was released on the occasion of Azerbaijan's Victory Day on Nov. 8, which celebrates Baku's victory in the 2020 Karabakh war. It said that despite its obligations, Armenia continued to provide military support to separatist forces in the Karabakh region amid peace talks.

It further emphasized that the separatist forces in the region ignored Azerbaijan's warnings at various levels and platforms, and increased their provocations back in September, resulting in the anti-terrorism operation which restored the country's full sovereignty over its territories.

"Currently, after the existence of the Armenian armed forces and the puppet regime created by Armenia in our territories were brought to an end, there are ample opportunities for peace and stability in the region," the statement said.

It added that "Armenia must finally recognize that there is no alternative to peace and cooperation in the region," noting that Azerbaijan calls on Armenia to demonstrate a "constructive and just position in the peace process and to understand the realities in the region properly."

Azerbaijan and Armenia relations have been tense since 1991, when the Armenian military occupied Karabakh, a territory internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, and seven adjacent regions.

Azerbaijan liberated most of the territory during a war in the fall of 2020, which ended after a Russian-brokered peace agreement and also opened the door to normalization.

This September, the Azerbaijani army initiated an anti-terrorism operation in Karabakh to establish constitutional order, after which illegal separatist forces in the region surrendered.

Azerbaijan, having now established full sovereignty in the region, has reiterated its call on the Armenian population in Karabakh to become part of Azerbaijani society.

Meanwhile, Azerbaijan and Serbia reiterated their support for each other's territorial integrity amid talks between Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov in Belgrade.

"President Aleksandar Vucic said that Serbia always supports the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and expressed gratitude for Azerbaijan's support to the territorial integrity of Serbia," according to a statement by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry.

It said satisfaction with the existing strategic partnership relationship between the two countries and the importance of mutual high-level visits were expressed during the meeting.

It also said Vucic and Bayramov exchanged views on the perspectives of the development of trade and economic relations, indicating there are a lot of opportunities for strategic cooperation in energy, agriculture, tourism and others.

"During the meeting, views were exchanged on the possibility of normalization of Armenian-Azerbaijani relations and establishment of sustainable peace in the region," it said, adding that other issues of mutual interest were also discussed.

Bayramov later held separate meetings with Vladimir Orlic, the head of the Serbian National Assembly and his Serbian counterpart, Ivica Dacic.

Bayramov visited Bucharest on Monday where he met his Romanian counterpart, Luminita Odobescu.

Armenpress: Azerbaijan-Iran border earthquake felt in Armenia’s south

 10:16, 8 November 2023

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 8, ARMENPRESS. A magnitude 5,4 earthquake that struck some 21km south-east from the Iranian city of Parsabad near the Iranian-Azeri border at 09:18, November 8 was also felt in several Armenian towns in the country’s south, the seismic protection agency of the Interior Ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

The quake was felt in the towns of Kajaran, Meghri and Goris at an intensity of MSK 3-4, in Sisian at MSK 3, and in Yeghegnadzor at MSK 2.

Skewed Armenia-Azerbaijan Policy Fails to Serve Interests of U.S. and California

Times of San Diego
Nov 1 2023

When it comes to Eurasia’s South Caucasus region, the _expression_ “to the victor belong the spoils” seemingly does not apply in foreign policy circles.

Today, the victor in Karabakh overwhelmingly receives condemnation, including from the U.S. government and California lawmakers.

Azerbaijan’s September victory in Karabakh — completing the liberation of formerly Armenia-occupied territories that began with Armenia’s surrender in the nations’ 44-day war in 2020 — is persistently met with accusations of “forcible displacement,” “ethnic cleansing,” and even “genocide.” Commentators lament how Karabakh’s “fight for independence” has ended.

The Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, which includes California-based U.S. Reps. Adam Schiff and David Valadao, last month accused Azerbaijan of “implementing a genocidal campaign against the Armenian people of Nagorno-Karabakh.” Schiff later introduced a resolution to require the State Department to report on the human rights practices of Azerbaijan, repeating the accusation that the country is “actively engaged in ethnic cleansing or genocide.”

Yet as 100,000 Armenians recently departed the region, such claims are devoid of both historical context and present realities on the ground.

According to the U.N. Human Rights Council, Azerbaijan hosts more than 650,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs), largely resulting from Armenia’s three-decade-long occupation of Karabakh — which four U.N. Security Council resolutions repeatedly reaffirm is Azerbaijani territory. As the narrative of Armenian displacement dominates today’s headlines, these Azerbaijani refugees are continuously forgotten.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken, meanwhile, in a call with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan “reaffirmed U.S. support for Armenia’s sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity.” USAID Administrator Samantha Power has used the same language. This means that longstanding State Department policy, which explicitly “supports the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan” and “does not recognize Nagorno-Karabakh as an independent country,” is disregarded at Foggy Bottom.

These double standards on IDPs and territorial integrity reflect an American policy rooted in a spur-of-the-moment reaction to the current situation, ignoring more than 30 years of history in the region.

What occurred in Karabakh from the early 1990s until 2020? It was Azerbaijanis, in fact, who were killed en masse and displaced within their country’s internationally recognized border.

Armenia’s occupation was marked by not only neglect but intentional destruction of the area — which remains painfully visible today through looted homes, mosques (including those that were used to house livestock), and cemeteries, and what U.N. experts estimate to be more than 1 million explosive devices in the area. What had once been a lush green area with vineyards as well as thriving wheat and cotton production prior to the occupation was decimated, as springs were blocked to divert water for military purposes.

Subsequently, what occurred between Azerbaijan’s victories in 2020 and 2023? When Armenia’s military had several weeks to withdraw from Karabakh following their surrender in the 2020 war, they used the time to plant difficult-to-detect explosives such as remote-controlled and plastic mines, posing threats to Azerbaijan’s redevelopment of Karabakh and the return of Azerbaijani IDPs to peaceful life in their homes.

Armenia has used the Lachin road — the road connecting Armenia with Karabakh — to transport landmines and plant them in the territory of Azerbaijan. At the same time, Azerbaijan faced widespread accusations that it had closed the Lachin road, even while it kept the road open to Armenians for humanitarian purposes.

The current U.S. administration and California lawmakers, however, have echoed the Armenian perspective to the detriment of international law and American interests. In contrast to his supportive words for Pashinyan, Blinken asked Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev “to refrain from further hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh and provide unhindered humanitarian access.”

Azerbaijan remains the key to U.S. national interests in the region as the administration navigates the complexities of policy toward Russia, China, and Iran. But Washington fails to give Baku the attention it deserves.

It must be asked: What is driving U.S. policy in the South Caucasus? Is it religion, given Armenia’s predominantly Christian population and Azerbaijan’s Muslim majority (though with strong interfaith and secular traditions)? Might it be partisan politics, shaped by the support Armenia receives from Congressional Democrats and its sizable diaspora in the blue state of California? And how does this skewed policy advance American and Californian interests?

It is incumbent upon U.S. and California leaders to understand that the world is watching their response in the South Caucasus. Regrettably, America’s allies and adversaries alike are witnessing a policy that practices double standards, lacks a moral compass, and fails to acknowledge decades of context in the region.

Americans are likely to be left with more questions than answers. Yet in the absence of a clear understanding of the administration’s motivation, the least they should expect of Washington is a balanced approach. Only then can the U.S. live up to its promise as a trustworthy broker of an enduring peace in the South Caucasus.

Jacob Kamaras is the editor and publisher of the San Diego Jewish World, the former editor-in-chief of the Jewish News Syndicate, and the founder of Stellar Jay Communications, a PR firm representing Azerbaijan.

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 11/03/2023

                                        Friday, November 3, 2023


Armenian Industrial Output Shrinks Amid Soaring Exports


Amenia - Workers at a textile factory in Vanadzor, August 28, 2023.


Armenia’s industrial production contracted in the first nine months of this year 
despite continuing economic growth driven, in large measure, by re-exports of 
various goods to sanctions-hit Russia.

The Armenian government’s Statistical Committee put its total amount at 1.84 
trillion drams ($4.6 billion), down by 0.6 percent from the same period of 2022. 
A downturn in the country’s export-oriented mining sector appears to have been 
instrumental in this drop contrasting with double-digit increases in trade, 
other services and construction.

The government data shows that wholesale and retail trade is the fastest growing 
sector of the domestic economy at present, having expanded by over 23 percent in 
January-September amid Armenia’s soaring trade with Russia.

Armenia’s imports and exports jumped by roughly 48 percent, continuing a trend 
that began after last year’s Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting 
barrage of Western sanctions against Russia. Goods manufactured in Western 
countries and their allies and re-exported from Armenia to Russia clearly 
accounted for most of this sharp gain. They mainly included second-hand cars and 
consumer electronics.

Armenia - Car carrier trailers line up near a customs terminal outside Gyumri, 
March 13, 2023
This explains why Armenian exports to Russia tripled in 2022 and doubled in 
January-August 2023. During the eight-month period, Russia generated half of 
Armenia’s overall export revenue worth $4.6 billion.

Used cars became Armenia’s number one export item in the first half of this 
year, according to data from the national customs service reported by Hetq.am. 
The South Caucasus country, which has no car industry, exported $311 million 
worth of various vehicles, circumventing U.S. and European Union bans on their 
shipments to Russia. Also, its first-half exports of mobile phones, TV sets and 
other electronics totaled $332 million.

The re-exports, coupled with other cash inflows from Russia, are the main reason 
why the Armenian economy expanded by 12 percent in 2022. The Armenian government 
and the Central Bank have forecast a 7 percent growth rate for this year.

The re-exports prompted concern from EU and especially U.S. officials earlier 
this year. They pressed the authorities in Yerevan to comply with the Western 
sanctions. The authorities introduced in May mandatory government licenses for 
shipments of microchips, transformers, video cameras, antennas and other 
electronic equipment to Russia.




Armenian Leaders Hit Back At Moscow


Armenia - Parliament speaker Alen SImonian chairs a session of the National 
Assembly, November 24, 2022.


Armenia’s political leadership rejected on Friday Russia’s latest claims that it 
is systematically “destroying” relations between the two longtime allies.

The Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, made the claims on 
Thursday when she condemned a senior Armenian official’s participation in 
Western-backed peace talks on the conflict Ukraine and meeting with the chief of 
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s staff. She called it a “demonstrative 
anti-Russian gesture of official Yerevan.”

Alen Simonian, the Armenian parliament speaker and a leading member of the 
ruling Civil Contract party, scoffed at Zakharova’s criticism. He suggested that 
Moscow does not want Yerevan to “communicate with partners on multilateral 
platforms” and is trying to maintain Armenia’s “existential dependence” on 
Russia.

“This is apparently the ‘right allied’ approach,” Simonian wrote in a Telegram 
post.

Echoing Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s recent statements, Simonian also 
accused the Russians of not honoring their security commitments to Armenia and 
recalled their past large-scale arms deals with Azerbaijan.

Another member of Pashinian’s political team, Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan, 
dismissed Zakharova’s complaints that Armenia’s state television and other 
pro-government media outlets have been spreading “Russophobic” propaganda.

“We believe that what our Russian partners are surprised by is the consequence 
of what we have seen on various [Russian] airwaves,” Mirzoyan told Armenian 
lawmakers.

He also said that the Armenian government hopes to mend fences with Moscow and 
“move on like partners.” “But not everything depends on one side,” added 
Mirzoyan.

The Russian Foreign Ministry earlier deplored “a series of unfriendly steps” 
taken by Pashinian’s administration. Those included his assertion Armenia’s 
military alliance with Russia has proved a “strategic mistakes” and Yerevan’s 
acceptance of jurisdiction of an international court that issued an arrest 
warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in March.

For its part, the Armenian side has held Moscow responsible for Azerbaijan’s 
recent military offensive that led to the mass of exodus of Nagorno-Karabakh’s 
ethnic Armenian population.

The deepening rift is raising growing questions about Armenia’s continued 
membership in Russian-led defense and trade blocs. Pashinian said last week that 
he is not considering demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops from Armenia 
even if he it sees no “advantages” in their presence.




Armenia ‘Optimistic’ As Turkey’s Erdogan Insists On Corridor For Azerbaijan

        • Aza Babayan
        • Astghik Bedevian

Turkey - Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan addresses members of parliament from 
his ruling AK Party, Ankara, October 25, 2023.


Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan sounded optimistic about the normalization of 
Armenia’s relations with Turkey on Friday just as Turkish President Erdogan 
Recep Tayyip again demanded that Yerevan open a special transport corridor for 
Azerbaijan.

Speaking at a summit of the leaders of Turkic states in Kazakhstan, Erdogan 
hailed Azerbaijan’s September 19-20 military operation that led to the exodus of 
Nagorno-Karabakh’s ethnic Armenian population and restored Azerbaijani control 
over the territory.

“Azerbaijan put an end to the 30-year occupation of Karabakh and we are very 
happy with and proud of this historic achievement,” he said. “Armenia must 
fulfill its obligations to Azerbaijan. This includes the opening of a transport 
corridor that will connect Nakhichevan to western regions of Azerbaijan.”

Erdogan said the corridor sought by Baku is important also because it would link 
Turkey to Central Asia which he described as “our ancestral homeland.”

Ankara set this as a key precondition when it started normalization talks with 
Yerevan in early 2022. The Armenian government has ruled out any 
extraterritorial corridors to Nakhichevan that would pass through Armenia’s 
Syunik province bordering Iran.

The normalization process essentially stalled last year even though the two 
sides reached an agreement to open the Turkish-Armenian border for their 
diplomatic passport holders and citizens of third countries.

“I want to express optimism that we may have some good news on this front in the 
near future,” Mirzoyan told Armenian lawmakers. He did not elaborate.

Speaking in the National Assembly earlier this week, Prime Minister Nikol 
Pashinian similarly expressed hope that the border agreement will be implemented 
soon.

Pashinian attended Erdogan’s inauguration in June. His domestic critics 
denounced the move, saying that Ankara will not unconditionally normalize 
Turkish-Armenian relations even after his unilateral concessions.

Another interim agreement reached by Turkish and Armenian negotiators last year 
called for air freight traffic between the two neighboring nations. There have 
been no signs of its implementation, even though the Turkish government 
officially allowed cargo shipments by air to and from Armenia in January 2023.




German FM Calls For Renewed Armenian-Azeri Talks

        • Nane Sahakian

Armenia - German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock at a news conference with 
her Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan, November 3, 2023.


German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock called on Armenia and Azerbaijan to 
resume peace talks mediated by the European Union when she visited Yerevan on 
Friday.

“Germany supports the territorial integrity of Armenia and Azerbaijan, and this 
must be the basis for all peace negotiations,” Baerbock said after meeting with 
her Armenian counterpart Ararat Mirzoyan.

“I believe that European Council President Charles Michel’s efforts could serve 
as a bridge for establishing peace between the two countries. Therefore, the 
start of a new round of negotiations is important,” she told a joint news 
conference.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev 
had been scheduled to meet, together with Michel, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz 
and French President Emmanuel Macron, in Spain on October 5. Aliyev withdrew 
from the talks at the last minute, citing pro-Armenian statements made by French 
officials.

Michel said afterwards that the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders will likely 
hold a trilateral meeting with him in Brussels later in October. That meeting 
did not take place either.

A senior Armenian lawmaker suggested on Monday that Aliyev is now reluctant to 
hold further talks with Pashinian to finalize an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace 
accord backed by the EU and the United States. The deal would commit Baku to 
explicitly recognizing Armenia’s current borders.

“Unfortunately, we still have serious concerns that … Azerbaijan still has, in 
one way or another, territorial claims to Armenia,” Mirzoyan said during the 
press conference with Baerbock.

There are lingering fears in Yerevan that Azerbaijan could invade Armenia to 
open a land corridor to its Nakhichevan exclave. Baerbock, who was due to 
proceed to Azerbaijan on Saturday, declined to say whether Germany would support 
a freeze on imports of Azerbaijani gas and oil or other EU sanctions against 
Baku in the event of such invasion. She spoke out against any further 
“escalation in this region.”

The German minister was also careful not to repeat her earlier condemnations of 
Azerbaijan’s September 19-20 offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh that forced the 
region’s ethnic Armenian population to flee to Armenia. She said only that the 
more than 100,000 Karabakh Armenians “left their homeland for security reasons” 
and praised the Armenian government’s response to the exodus. Baerbock also 
announced that Berlin will provide 9.3 million euros ($10 million) in additional 
humanitarian aid to the refugees.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

"Entrust Armenia’s security to an American private company" – political scientist

Oct 30 2023
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Ensuring Armenia’s security

“If we do not take decisive action, the situation will end with [an Azerbaijan] attack on Armenia, and the Armenian authorities will be forced to ask Russia to intervene. And the price will be the corridor [“Zangezur corridor”, which the Armenian authorities refuse to give to Azerbaijan],” Armenian political scientist Areg Kochinyan says.

He proposes to hire an American private military company to solve the country’s security problems in the short term – at least for 2-3 years – until reforms in the defense sector are completed.

In an interview with a local publication, the analyst talked about the likelihood of a new war or escalation, approaches to the settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict, and the position of mediators.


  • “It is not necessary to provide security only with the army” – Pashinyan
  • Meeting in “3+3” format. Opinion from Yerevan: “There are risks, no benefits”
  • Armenia-Azerbaijan talks. Will Aliyev go to Brussels and what to expect?

“There are dozens of private military companies in the states that also work with foreign governments. The key to solving our short-term security problem is right here.”

Meghri is the section through which Azerbaijan intends to obtain the so-called “Zangezur corridor”. The Ijevan direction is in the neighborhood of enclaves whose return is demanded by the Azerbaijani authorities. Areg Kochinyan believes that the invasion of Azerbaijani armed forces is most likely in these areas.

The analyst emphasizes: this step certainly indicates a change in the vector of Armenia’s foreign policy, but its ally, Russia, “itself has already changed its vector with regard to Armenia.”

This is not the first time Kochinyan has also said that Armenia should immediately leave the Russian CSTO military bloc, abandon the military base stationed in the country, and “rethink Armenian-Russian relations.” He says that in the short term, economic strikes from Russia may have a strong negative impact. But the economic, energy, infrastructure and all other problems Armenia will face are quite solvable.

Military expert Leonid Nersisyan believes that “Baku will not occupy, for example, the southern region of Armenia, Syunik, but will resort to a new escalation”

Kochinyan sees the preconditions for a perfect storm that will lead to a new war or escalation in the region. He considers the failure of the Pashinyan-Aliyev talks scheduled for late October in Brussels a step in this direction.

According to him, after Azerbaijan’s recent military operation in Nagorno-Karabakh, there is no more status quo that existed at the time of signing the statement of November 9, 2020.

“Now the mediators are competing over which platform this document will be formed. Azerbaijan, on the other hand, is trying to get the maximum before that.”

Baku’s plans now include he “Zangezur corridor”, in which Russia is also interested. This explains Azerbaijan’s reluctance to participate in the negotiations on the Western platform and sign a document based on the principles laid down in Granada.

Kochinyan’s list of “destabilizing elements” leading to a new escalation:

  • US inconsistency: “the statement by Acting Deputy Secretary of State Yuri Kim that the US will not tolerate ethnic cleansing against the people of Nagorno-Karabakh and Baku’s impunity afterward.”
  • position of the Russian Federation: if the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict is resolved, Russia will find itself as a “ship without a harbor” in the region, so Moscow needs a new escalation to have an excuse to “save Armenians”;
  • the failure of the Brussels meeting, after which the West was in a sense out of the game;
  • Azerbaijan’s readiness for military action.

Saakashvili writes that Armenia is “overdue for European integration,” but recent developments give the region a new chance.

The political analyst says that it is better for Armenia to negotiate directly with Azerbaijan, or with Azerbaijan and Turkey, than to go to the Russian capital. He declared a meeting mediated by the Russian side the worst option, as it creates a “three against one” situation.

According to Kochinyan, it is critical for Russia that a settlement not take place, so it is important to first change its political vector towards the West:

“Attempting a settlement in a situation while the Russian Federation has such a level of influence in the region, especially in Armenia, is just self-deception.”

He believes that if the West is left out of the negotiation process, it will react to a possible escalation by “expressing deep concern, appealing and condemning”.

But if the Western platform can be maintained, one can expect to negotiate with Azerbaijan. In particular, he speaks of the desirability of organizing a meeting of foreign ministers in Washington. According to Kochinyan, this would be a step backward compared to the Brussels meeting, which was to be held with the participation of the leaders of the two countries, but in this way the West would not be finally thrown out of the process.

https://jam-news.net/ensuring-armenias-security-suggestions-of-a-political-scientist/

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 10/24/2023

                                        Tuesday, 


France Touts Military Support For Armenia

        • Artak Khulian

France - French Defense Minister Sébastien Lecornu (left) greets his Armenian 
counterpart Suren Papikian in Paris, October 23, 2023.


Defense Minister Sebastien Lecornu underlined France’s commitment to helping 
Armenia “defend itself” on Tuesday one day after holding talks with his visiting 
Armenian counterpart Suren Papikian followed by the signing of first-ever arms 
deals between the two countries.

One of them calls for the South Caucasus nation’s purchase of three 
sophisticated radar systems from the French defense group Thales. Lecornu and 
his Armenian counterpart Suren Papikian also signed a “letter of intent” on the 
future delivery of French-manufactured surface-to-air missiles. No financial 
details of these agreements or delivery dates were made public.

“Armenia must be able to defend itself and protect its population,” Lecornu said 
in a series of tweets posted on the X social media platform in French and 
Armenian.

“Happy to progress, with you dear Suren, on the three pillars of our defense 
relationship,” he wrote, listing the planned arms supplies, training of Armenian 
military personnel and technical assistance to the ongoing “transformation” of 
Armenia’s armed forces.

Lecornu reaffirmed that a senior French officer will be sent to Armenia to 
advise its military on those reforms and that teams of French instructors will 
teach Armenian troops new combat techniques. The training courses will focus on 
“mountain combat and precision shooting,” he said.

France - Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov attends a news conference 
during a contract signing event for GM200, a medium-range radar produced for air 
defense, as part of a visit at the Thales radar factory in Limours, February 1, 
2023.

The French minister also pointed to the “upcoming audit” and “reinforcement” of 
Armenia’s air defenses that suffered serious losses during the 2020 war in 
Nagorno-Karabakh and last year’s border clashes with Azerbaijan. The Azerbaijani 
army’s heavy use of Turkish and Israeli-made combat drones and the Armenian 
side’s failure to neutralize them determined, in large measure, the outcome of 
the six-week war.

Speaking at a joint news conference with Papikian on Monday, Lecornu said 
Armenian officers will be trained to operate the GM200 radars and short-range 
Mistral missiles that are also due to be sold to Yerevan.

GM200 can simultaneously detect and track multiple warplanes, drones and even 
rockets within a 250-kilometer radius, allowing air-defense units to hit such 
targets. France supplied two such systems to Ukraine earlier this year.

France, which is home to an influential Armenian community, is the first Western 
country to have pledged to provide major weaponry to Armenia. Papikian again 
thanked Paris for its military support when he met with senior French lawmakers 
on Tuesday.




Still No Date Set For Aliyev-Pashinian Talks In Brussels

        • Astghik Bedevian
        • Tatevik Lazarian

Belgium - EU Council President Charles Michel meets the leaders of Armenia and 
Azerbaijan in Brussels, July 15, 2023.


It remained unclear on Tuesday whether the European Union’s top official, 
Charles Michel, will manage to host fresh talks between Armenian Prime Minister 
Nikol Pashinian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev before the end of this 
month.

Pashinian and Aliyev were scheduled to meet, together with Michel and the 
leaders of Germany and France, on the fringes of the EU’s October 5 summit in 
Granada, Spain. Armenian officials expected them to sign a framework peace deal 
there. However, Aliyev withdrew from the talks at the last minute, citing 
pro-Armenian statements made by French officials. Michel said afterwards that 
the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders will likely hold a trilateral meeting with 
him in Brussels later in October.

Pashinian’s office refused to clarify on Tuesday whether the meeting will take 
place and, if so, when. An Armenian pro-government lawmaker, Gurgen Arsenian, 
said in this regard that Yerevan “hasn’t cancelled the meeting.”

“I still assume that the meeting will take place and be productive,” Arsenian 
said without giving any possible dates.

Addressing the European Parliament last week, Pashinian said he hopes to meet 
Aliyev and sign an Armenian-Azerbaijani peace treaty “by the end of the year.” 
He said the deal is hampered by Baku’s reluctance to recognize Armenia’s borders 
and its demands for a special corridor to Azerbaijan’s Nakhichevan exclave 
passing through Armenian territory.

Azerbaijan’s recent takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh raised more fears in Yerevan 
that Baku will also attack Armenia to open the corridor. Pashinian echoed them 
in his speech at the EU legislature.

Azerbaijan - Azeri and Turkish troops start "Mustafa Kemal Ataturk-2023" joint 
exercises, October 23, 2023.

The Azerbaijani and Turkish militaries began on Monday a joint military exercise 
near Armenia’s Syunik province sandwiched between Nakhichevan and mainland 
Azerbaijan. It reportedly involves 3,000 soldiers, over a hundred artillery 
systems and several Turkish F-16 warplanes.

The drills coincided with a meeting in Tehran of the foreign ministers of 
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Russia and Turkey. In a joint statement issued after 
the meeting, they called for regional peace based on the “inviolability of 
internationally recognized borders” and spoke out against “use of force” or 
threats of it.

The Armenian Foreign Ministry confirmed on Tuesday that Foreign Minister Ararat 
Mirzoyan and his Azerbaijani counterpart Jeyhun Bayramov spoke separately during 
the Tehran gathering. A ministry spokeswoman appeared to downplay their 
“informal” conversation, saying that this kind of contacts is “customary for 
such platforms.”




Armenia, Iran To Scrap Truck Tolls In Mutual Trade

        • Robert Zargarian

Armenia - Iranian trucks are parked on a roadside in Syunik, October 7, 2021.


In an effort to boost bilateral trade, Armenia and Iran have agreed to stop 
levying road taxes from commercial trucks entering each other’s territory.

Armenian Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures Gnel 
Sanosian and Iranian Minister of Roads and Urban Development Mehrzad Bazrpash 
announced the agreement after talks held in Yerevan on Monday.

“The idea is to nullify all payments [for road use] for both Iranian trucks 
travelling to Armenia or using Armenia as a transit route and Armenian trucks 
entering Iran … and to help that business develop more successfully,” Sanosian 
told reporters.

“When we abolish the road tolls, goods will reach consumers at a lower cost,” 
Bazrpash said, for his part.

Armenia currently charges Iranians truck using its highways roughly $250 for 
every journey to or through the South Caucasus country. Armenian hauliers pay a 
similar sum in Iran.

The governments of the two neighboring states have for years discussed the 
possibility of mutual abolition of the truck tolls. The two ministers did not 
say when the agreement to that effect reached by them will be put into practice. 
It requires amendments to their tax legislations.

According to Armenian government data, Armenia’s trade with Iran rose by 6 
percent year on year to almost $454 million in the first eight months of this 
year. Iranian exports to Armenia accounted for as much as 85 percent of that 
figure, suggesting that the scrapping of the tax will primarily benefit Iranian 
firms.

Cargo traffic between the two states is carried out through Syunik, the sole 
Armenian region bordering the Islamic Republic. Two Iranian companies were 
formally contracted by the Armenian government on Monday to rebuild a 
32-kilometer section of the region’s main highway leading to the Iranian border. 
Sanosian and Bazrpash attended the signing of the contract worth $215 million.




Armenia Protests To Russia Over Anti-Pashinian TV Show

        • Aza Babayan

RUSSIA -- The flag of Channel One at the Ostankino TV Center in Moscow, October 
28, 2019


The Armenian Foreign Ministry summoned the Russian ambassador in Yerevan on 
Tuesday to condemn Russia’s leading state-run broadcaster for disparaging Prime 
Minister Nikol Pashinian during an hour-long program aired on Monday.

The ministry said Ambassador Sergei Kopyrkin was handed a note of protest in 
connection with “offensive and absolutely unacceptable statements” made during 
the program.

The Russian Channel One’s talk show featured videos scrutinizing Pashinian’s 
background and casting him in a bad light as well as pro-Kremlin panelists who 
denounced his track record and portrayed him as a Western puppet tasked with 
ending Armenia’s close relationship with Russia. The show host, who added her 
voice to their derogatory comments, also interviewed an Armenian opposition 
politician, Andranik Tevanian, in the studio.

The unprecedented program highlighted a deepening rift between Moscow and 
Yerevan which accelerated after last month’s Azerbaijani military offensive in 
Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia’s failure to prevent or stop it.

Addressing the European Parliament last week, Pashinian accused Moscow of using 
the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict to try to topple him. A Russian government 
source responded by comparing the Armenian leader to President Volodymyr 
Zelenskiy of Ukraine which was invaded by Russia last year.

Russia - Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin chairs a session of the Russian State Duma, 
October 27, 2022.

In what appeared to be a related development, the speaker of the Russian lower 
house of parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin, announced on Tuesday that the State 
Duma has indefinitely delayed the passage of legislation allowing holders of 
Armenian driving licenses to work as drivers in Russia. Volodin attributed the 
move to Yerevan’s failure to give the Russian language an official status.

The Armenian government signaled its unhappiness with state-controlled Russian 
broadcasters’ coverage of Armenia even before the scandalous show aired by 
Channel One. A parliament deputy representing Pashinian’s Civil Contract party 
said last month that the government should ban the retransmission of this and 
two other Russian TV channels in the country.

But another pro-government lawmaker, Gurgen Arsenian, spoke out against such a 
ban. Arsenian, who is also Armenia’s ambassador-designate to Russia, downplayed 
the Channel One program, claiming that it actually boosted Pashinian’s approval 
ratings at home.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

With the support of Ucom, the 18th annual International Microelectronics Olympiad was held

 15:27,

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 23, ARMENPRESS. The results of the 18th annual International Olympiad of Microelectronics, with Ucom as the main supporter, were announced during a solemn ceremony held at Synopsys Armenia. This Olympiad featured 270 participants from 14 countries and followed its traditional format of two stages. The first round, serving as a preliminary test, took place simultaneously in 14 participating countries. The second and final round, which involved complex engineering challenges requiring comprehensive solutions, occurred on October 19 in Armenia at the Synopsys Armenia Education Department.

Out of the 270 participants who took part in the first round, 28 advanced to the final round. Among them, 12 were from Yerevan, while the rest came to Armenia from countries such as the UAE, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Iran, Jordan, Chile, Peru, Russia, Serbia, and Vietnam.

"One of the primary objectives of the Olympiad is to establish an international community of young specialists in the field of microelectronics. Over the years, hundreds of exceptional young individuals from more than 25 countries worldwide, who represent the future creators of leading technologies, have participated in the Olympiad," said Hovik Musayelyan, Vice President of the Olympiad's Organizing Committee and Director of Synopsis Armenia.

"Technologies have evolved to a point where microelectronics is indispensable. I have been the main supporter of this event for 18 years, and I will continue to be because I firmly believe that the future is intricately linked with microelectronics. We must make every effort to promote this field, especially among Armenian youth and students. I have even encouraged my son to pursue a study of microelectronics because it represents the future, the foundational technology when we discuss artificial intelligence and intelligent solutions," stated Ralph Yirikian, Director General of Ucom, the key supporter of the Microelectronics Olympiad.

Let us note that Nikola Babic from Bosnia and Herzegovina secured the first prize in the Olympiad, followed by Filip Stefanovic from Serbia in second place, while the third prize was jointly claimed by Azra Jelezovic from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Edgar Papyan from Armenia. 

The Olympiad covered the following topics:

  • Design and testing of digital integrated circuits,
  • Design and testing of analog and mixed signal integrated circuits,
  • Semiconductor devices and technology,
  • Mathematical and algorithmic support for automated design of integrated circuits.