Armenia Supreme Judicial Council holding urgent session, judge says his life is being threatened

News.am, Armenia

Judge Mher Petrosyan of the Administrative Court, who rendered an interim decision with regard to Onik Gasparyan [ex-chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces], has addressed the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC and informed that his life is being threatened, ArmLur.am reports.

According to ArmLur.am’s sources, the SJC has convened an urgent session and is examining the threats addressed to the judge.

On March 10, 2021, Onik Gasparyan submitted a statement of claim to the Administrative Court of Armenia against President of Armenia Armen Sarkissian and Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan with the demand to declare the decree on his dismissal from the position of Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces (approved with the statement by the Prime Minister of 10 March 2021 on considering Onik Gasparyan dismissed from the position of Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces by virtue of law) null and void.

On March 17, the Administrative Court of Armenia, under the chairmanship of Judge Mher Petrosyan, granted the motion of the attorney to apply a measure for securing the claim of Onik Gasparyan by which the demand was to acknowledge the absence of legal relations for dismissing Onik Gasparyan from the position.

LHK lawmaker Gevorg Gorgisyan “invited” to NSS

Save

Share

 17:15,

YEREVAN, MARCH 22, ARMENPRESS. Opposition Bright Armenia (LHK) party lawmaker Gevorg Gorgisyan says he has been summoned by the National Security Service for a “conversation”.

“Eventually my turn has come,” he said in a statement. “They invited me to have a conversation about the November 10 capture of the parliament building,” he said, referring to the 2020 November 10 protests in Yerevan, when demonstrators angry over the terms of the Karabakh armistice stormed the parliament building and the government headquarters.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan

Montreal: ‘Extremely racist’ event by Concordia student groups cancelled, guest condemns ‘sad day for freedom of speech’

CTV News, Canada

Luca Caruso-MoroCTV News Montreal Digital Reporter


MONTREAL — Student groups at Concordia University found themselves in hot water this week after inviting the Turkish ambassador to give a talk on the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The talk — which was supposed to happen on Friday — was on the Nagorno-Karabakh region, an area which has been the site of warfare for generations. Geographically, the region is in Azerbaijan, but the majority population is ethnic-Armenian.

The latest outburst of hostilities began Sept. 27 and has left hundreds, perhaps thousands, dead, marking the worst escalation of fighting in almost three decades. Neither side has taken responsibility for instigating the conflict.

Turkey has been a strong ally to Azerbaijan, which led some student groups to criticize event planners that had invited the Turkish ambassador to give a talk on Friday.

In a Thursday press release, four Armenian students’ advocacy groups called the event “extremely racist in nature,” adding that “hosting Turkey’s representative unopposed and providing the government of Turkey an academic platform to discuss the Nagorno-Karabakh war is unethical, at best.”

“If you want to have a dialogue about Nagorno Karabakh, the voices that should be heard should be the ambassador of Armenia and the ambassador of Azerbaijan,” said Leonardo Torosian, co-president of the Armen Karo Student Association, one of the undersigned groups.

(Leonardo Torosian, co-president of the Armen Karo Student Association)

CTV News reached out to Concordia University for comment. A spokesperson responded to say the event had been planned by “independent student groups [who] decide their own activities.”

Under pressure from the student groups and commenters on social media, the organizing groups decided to cancel the event.

“Many have voiced their disapproval of this event,” read a statement posted Friday to social media by the student groups that organized the talk, which they said “was not meant as an endorsement of any state or political actor.”

Turkish Ambassador Kerim Uras took to social media to voice his disapproval of the cancellation on Friday, which he called “a sad day for freedom of speech and Charter rights in Canada.”

“Radical Armenian groups can’t even tolerate a free exchange of views with a group of students,” he wrote. “Their use of the word ‘racist’ shows their intellectual poverty.”

“This is a person that represents a dictatorial Turkish regime,” said Torosian, referring to the ambassador.

“[A country] which violates human rights, which closes universities; we do not understand how any Canadian university can host such an ambassador,” he said.

— With files from the Associated Press

Azerbaijani man kills pregnant sister married to an Armenian in greater Moscow area

News.am, Armenia

A pregnant woman married to an Armenian was killed by an Azerbaijani in the greater Moscow area and died on the spot due to her injury, and the Investigative Committee of Russia has launched a criminal case under the article of murder, Vechernyaya Moskva newspaper reports.

The murderer is 43-year-old Munir, who attacked his 40-year-old sister, Leyla. Andrey Kolobin, one of the locals, said he had heard how the man screamed at the girl, called her a prostitute and blamed her for not following Muslim traditions. He added that, unfortunately, there was nobody near her when she was stabbed with a knife and had already died when the paramedics arrived.

Surveillance cameras recorded the crime, and shots of the incident show how a man dressed in black approaches the girl and starts beating her, takes out a knife and starts stabbing her. After killing the girl, he throws the weapon and hides.

Anastasia Kalimova, who knows Leyla’s family, told the newspaper what the reason for the murder was. “The reason for the murder was that Leyla’s family was against Leyla getting married to an Armenian, and her family didn’t consider her “clean”. They lived together for seven years and had children. Where was Leyla’s brother all this time? The fact that her brother killed her and left the children without a mother is horrible. The children already know that their mother is gone.”

Azerbaijani President’s aggressive rhetoric complicates constructive cooperation – Luxembourg FM

Save

Share

 16:39,

YEREVAN, MARCH 19, ARMENPRESS. Foreign Minister of Luxembourg Jean Asselborn commented on the questions of the head of the Alternative Democratic Reforms (ADR) faction of the Parliament relating to the current uncertainty around the future of Nagorno Karabakh after the ceasefire.

Armenpress presents the FM’s responses to the questions:

Question: “What is the European Union’s approach to the legal status of Artsakh (Nagorno Karabakh) from the perspective of international public law? The final recognition? What do you think?

Answer: EU hopes the sides will manage to find a lasting solution through negotiations which will define the legal status of Nagorno Karabakh with the consent of all parties. In this sense, EU supports the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship, the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and her Personal Representative.

Question: How does Luxembourg assess the approaches of Armenia and Azerbaijan over the requirements of N2357 resolution of the PACE adopted on January 25? Does the government think that the sides have implemented all the provisions of the resolution, if not, where does Luxembourg see difference in approaches in particular in the following formulations of the resolution: “to refuse from statements escalating the situation which can block the political dialogue, ensure the implementation of the humanitarian obligations assumed by the trilateral statement, such as the return of all prisoners of war and other detained persons, the bodies of the dead, the preservation of cultural heritage”?

Answer: The exchange of POWs is one of the points of the ceasefire statement which is the most problematic till now. Armenia has returned all detained persons, however, a lot of Armenian POWs are still held captive in Azerbaijan. The aggressive rhetoric between the two countries, which is especially being constantly inflamed by the Azerbaijani President, complicates the constructive cooperation. The preservation of cultural heritage of the region also remains one of the contentious issues for the sides.

Question: In the past Azerbaijan has criticized the EU and its member states for many times. On January 31 the foreign ministry of that country issued a statement, calling EU’s approaches as one-sided and based on double standards, which, it said, could damage the relations with Azerbaijan. Moreover, on December 24 Ilham Aliyev called French, Belgian and Dutch politicians as hypocrites, calling on them to open their eyes and look at the reality. What was the impact of these statements on the Luxembourg-Azerbaijan relations? Given these realities and the meeting of the EU-Azerbaijan Cooperation Council on December 18 last year, to what extent is it appropriate to have such cooperation with Azerbaijan, also within the Eastern Partnership?

Answer: Azerbaijan is a participant of the EU’s Neighborhood Policy and Eastern Partnership, which allows the EU and its member states to engage not only in the constructive, but also criticizing dialogue with Azerbaijan. In this way EU can become an important role-player in the context of respecting the international law and human rights by the Azerbaijani authorities.

Question: On November 19, 2020, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy made a statement over the situation in Nagorno Karabakh. Since this statement did the Luxembourg government see concrete developments in the region in terms of EU’s calls. If not, what problems still exist and who is responsible for them?

Answer: The ceasefire regime is being observed up to now since the November 10 statement, with exceptions to some incidents, however, the aggressive rhetoric has not been eliminated, and the issue of the exchange of POWs is in the deadlock. There is also no investigation of the military crimes, the humanitarian situation in Nagorno Karabakh remains tense, the entry of international organizations to the region is blocked by Azerbaijan, there are still no signs for the lasting solution to the conflict.

Question: Is the EU going to provide assistance to the population of the region aimed at preventing the humanitarian disaster in Artsakh?

Answer: The EU has provided humanitarian support to the region since the crisis days which comprised 6.9 million Euros.

Question: Did the situation in Nagorno Karabakh and the aggressive rhetoric of the Azerbaijani authorities towards the EU have an impact on the European visa policy towards that country, especially for the Azerbaijani diplomatic passport holders?

Answer: The visa policy is regulated by the visa facilitation and readmission agreements signed with Azerbaijan in 2014, and nothing has changed in this respect.

Question: Does Luxembourg support the possibility of deploying observers by the OSCE in Nagorno Karabakh? Can the OSCE play a role in the process of investigating the military crimes in the region?

Answer: The deployment of OSCE observer mission is possible in case of receiving such a request with the consent of all sides. Luxembourg supports that proposal and the OSCE efforts. The OSCE’s function is to prevent and solve conflicts. It has no tool to deal with the investigation of military crimes.

Top Armenian diplomat says Armenian heritage destroyed in Nagorno-Karabakh district

TASS, Russia
He also again emphasized that Azerbaijan is still “withholding Armenian prisoners of war”

YEREVAN, March 16. /TASS/. Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Aivazian has revealed that Armenian heritage is being destroyed in Nagorno-Karabakh’s Hadrut District, noting that it inhibits efforts to establish long-lasting peace in the region.

“The destruction of Armenian heritage in [Nagorno] Karabakh’s Hadrut District and creation of Azerbaijani residential communities there cannot serve as a basis to establish long-lasting peace in the region,” he said Tuesday at a press conference with Ann Linde, Foreign Minister of Sweden, current chair of the OSCE.

He also again emphasized that Azerbaijan is still “withholding Armenian prisoners of war.”

Almost all of the Hadrut District and the town of Shusha, which were parts of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region in the Soviet times, were handed over to Azerbaijan in accordance with the joint statement signed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on November 9, 2020 which ended hostilities in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict zone as renewed clashes erupted there on September 27, 2020. According to the statement, the Azerbaijani and Armenian armies maintain their positions, while several regions were handed over to Baku. Moreover, Russian peacekeepers were deployed along the line of engagement and the Lachin Corridor. Meanwhile, the provision eight of the statement mandates that the parties exchange prisoners under the ‘all-for-all’ principle.

The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the highland region of Nagorno-Karabakh, a disputed territory that had been part of Azerbaijan before the Soviet Union break-up, but primarily populated by ethnic Armenians, broke out in February 1988 after the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region announced its withdrawal from the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. In 1992-1994, tensions boiled over and exploded into large-scale military action for control over the enclave and seven adjacent territories after Azerbaijan lost control of them.

Aliyev Claims Zangezur is ‘Historic Azerbaijani Territory’

March 5, 2021



The Gates of Zangezur in Armenia

A “new transport corridor will pass through Zangezur, a historic territory of Azerbaijan, and will connect mainland Azerbaijan with its integral part, the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic, and Turkey,” Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said during a speech at an economic conference.

Aliyev also declared that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has been resolved and all United Nations Security Council resolutions have been fulfilled through its aggressive attack on Artsakh on September 27, which sparked a full-blown war.

With such a provocative statement, calling Zangezur an ‘historic Azerbaijani territory’ and making reference to an imaginary corridor, the President of Azerbaijan deliberately undermines the implementation of the November 9 and January 11 trilateral statements,” said Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Anna Naghdalyan, who, once again, stressed that “Article 9 of the November 9 trilateral statement does not mention the establishment of a corridor.”

“Such rhetoric contradicts Azerbaijan’s obligations. It is a blatant challenge to international law, and in no way does it contribute to the stability of the region and threatens all states in the region,” added Naghdalyan.

“The statements of the President of Azerbaijan that Azerbaijan has resolved the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict by the use of force further illustrates who unleashed the war and who is leading the region through new challenges and further destabilization,” explained Naghdalyan

“As always, Azerbaijan is distorting the provisions of the UN Security Council resolutions, while these same resolutions express their support for the Minsk Group peace process, headed by the Minsk Group Co-Chairs,” said Naghdalyan.

“With his statements on the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, the President of Azerbaijan contradicts the position of the international community, and first of all, the position of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairmanship and Co-Chair countries, which clearly emphasizes the imperative of comprehensive settlement of the conflict. It is obvious to us that the attempt to suppress the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination through the use of force cannot create grounds for the settlement of the conflict. The realization of the right of the people of Artsakh to self-determination and the elimination of the consequences of the war are the core elements of the peace process,” explained Naghdalyan.

German Bundestag hosts discussion on Armenian POWs held in Azerbaijan

Public Radio of Armenia
March 4 2021

Armenian Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan presented a report at a special online discussion on Armenian prisoners of war in Azerbaijan organized in the German Bundestag.

The discussion took place under the chairmanship of Michael Brandt, Chairman of the Bundestag Standing Committee on Human Rights, and Marian Wendt, Chair of the Bundestag Petition Committee. More than 70 German deputies took part in the discussion.

The Defender raised the issue of the urgency of the return of prisoners of war — servicemen and civilians — of the Armenian side detained in Azerbaijan. Arman Tatoyan noted that the Azerbaijani authorities are artificially delaying and politicizing the process so as to cause mental suffering to the Armenian society and especially to the families of the captives, and in order to create tension in the country.

The Human Rights Defender of Armenia presented in detail the international humanitarian and human rights rules which require the immediate release of prisoners and their safe return. The Ombudsman emphasized the gross violations of international humanitarian law and the rights of prisoners who are wrongly portrayed as “terrorists” given the circumstances of ongoing armed conflict.

The Ombudsman also provided information on war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Azerbaijani armed forces during the war (beheadings, torture, humiliation of bodies, etc).

Arman Tatoyan thanked the members of the German Parliament for the discussion.

The Human Rights Defender hailed the assistance of the Armenian Embassy in Germany in organizing this discussion.

The evidence on the Azerbaijani atrocities and torture collected by the Human Rights Defender of Armenia was passed on by the Armenian Ambassador Ashot Smbatyan to Amnesty International in Germany.

President Sarkissian, opposition LHK leader discuss political crisis

 15:01, 2 March, 2021

YEREVAN, MARCH 2, ARMENPRESS. The leader of the Bright Armenia (LHK) opposition party Edmon Marukyan says he visited President Armen Sarkissian and discussed the domestic situation and the possible resolutions for the political crisis.

“I visited President Armen Sarkissian and wished him good health,” Marukyan said. 

On March 1, the presidency had said that the president is feeling unwell.

“We discussed the possible resolutions for the crisis domestic political situation, the issue of early elections of parliament, and the appropriateness of shifting to a semi-presidential system of governance through constitutional amendments,” Marukyan said in a statement.

Editing and Translating by Stepan Kocharyan


Why is Russia behind Armenia military coup plot?

Mirage News, Australia
Feb 26 2021

Armenia’s prime minister Nikol Pashinyan announced on Thursday the country’s top military officers are plotting a “coup,” and called his supporters to the streets in the capital Yerevan.  The opposition staged a rival rally.

He has rejected calls to resign, saying he needs to ensure the post-war security and economic recovery of the impoverished former Soviet republic of less than 3 million.

Pashinyan has faced protests after losing last year’s war with Azerbaijan over Nagorno Karabakh.

Pashinyan emerged as the leader of a wave of anti-government street protests that rocked Armenia in the spring of 2018, bringing an end to 10 years of rule by Serzh Sargsyan who had close ties to Russia.

Pashinyan, who led what has become known as Armenia’s “Velvet Revolution”, swept Russian-backed elites out of power, promised human rights would be protected, and that corruption and election-rigging would end.

For many Armenians this was the first time since independence from the Soviet Union in 1991 that they were able to believe in a better future, loosen ties with Russia and turn to the west and improve relations with neighbouring countries.

During the revolution, Russia recognized its own limitations and refrained from open involvement to not to lose its key foothold for Russia in the South Caucasus.

Although underground activities to rock the boat and end what Russia calls “George Soros project” , Russia mostly adopted a wait-and-see approach.

Russia has accused the billionaire investor George Soros of  masterminding “color revolutions”  that toppled authoritarians in several countries of the former Soviet Union. Indeed, Vladimir Putin has grown obsessed with the color revolutions that have brought down other strongmen regimes, including next door in Ukraine. He reportedly views them as covers for Western-backed coups, worrying that he could be next.

During the street protests, Pashinyan rode anti-Russian sentiment, corruption and poverty, criticized Armenia’s dependence on Russia and the advantage that Russia took of Armenia’s weakness and isolation.

Putin and the Russian media under his control have not always treated Pashinyan kindly, have tried to portray every failure as the failure and consequences of the velvet revolution.

The current crisis has its roots in Armenia’s humiliating defeat in heavy fighting with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh that erupted in late September and lasted 44 days.

Nagorno Karabakh is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan but was captured along with several adjacent regions by Armenia and was in control of ethnic Armenians from 1994 to 2020.

Russia had long sought to place its “peacekeepers” in the region and had offered a peaceful solution package under which Armenia would return most of lands it had captured from Azerbaijan in 1990s and let Russia deploy its military to the areas where ethnic Armenians live.

Russia covertly supported Armenia in its conflict with Azerbaijan, but more or less kept a show of political balance and refrained from extending open political and military support to Armenia as it also needed warm relations with Azerbaijan and its green-light for the peacekeeping mission.

By playing strategically to earn some points with Azerbaijan, Russia also sought to increase its influence and “peacemaker role” in what it calls its “near abroad” where Azerbaijan is the largest, most populous and most resources-rich country which it hopes to attract to its Eurasian Economic Union (Armenia is already a member) to one day re-create the Soviet Union.

During the war, Putin deliberately waited for Azerbaijan to achieve certain territorial gains to weaken Pashinyan in Armenia so that he can use its own influence in Yerevan to oust him and install another Armenian leader more pliable to Russia’s wishes.

Eventually on the midnight of November 10, 2020, the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia signed the Russian-brokered deal to end the 44-day war in which the Azerbaijani army routed Armenian forces.

Under the deal, as Russia had long sought, Russian peacekeepers were deployed in the areas of Nagorno Karabakh where ethnic Armenians live, Azerbaijan got back part of Nagorno Karabakh plus 7 adjacent regions, including 3 from which Armenia withdrew without a fight.

Pashinyan has defended the peace deal as a painful but necessary move to prevent Azerbaijan from overrunning the entire Nagorno Karabakh region, and to ensure the peace in the South Caucasus region to move forward.

This week Nikol Pashinyan  questioned the effectiveness and quality of Russian weapons, especially Russia’s most boasted-about Iskander ballistic missile (NATO name SS-26 Stone) used by his country during the recent conflict against Azerbaijan.

He said Iskander missiles the army fired “didn’t explode on impact or rather only 10% did”, drawing harsh reactions from top Russian officials and the Kremlin-controlled media.

Some top military officers, including the deputy chief of the General Staff rushed to criticize the PM for publicly discussing sensitive military matters.

Pashinyan fired the deputy chief of the General Staff, Lieutenant General Tiran Khachatryan.

The General Staff responded with a statement demanding Pashinyan’s resignation and warned the government against using force against the opposition protesters.

Pashinyan responded by firing the General Staff chief Colonel General Onik Gasparyan, and later took to the streets of the capital, Yerevan, in a bid to rally supporters behind him. Thousands came out in support of Pashinyan.

After the statement, Pashinyan dismissed the General Staff chief Colonel General Onik Gasparyan although the country’s President Armen Sarkisian has so far refused to approve his the dismissal request.

Talking to his backers on Republic Square in the heart of Yerevan, Pashinyan said  any change in power must take place “only through elections”.

“The army is not a political institution and attempts to involve it in political processes are unacceptable,” he said.

He told his supporters he mulled over his resignation.

“But then I said that I did not become prime minister of my own free will, but that the people decided so. And the people must decide the issue of my departure. Let the people demand my resignation, let them shoot me in the square, ” he said at the rally.

He also threatened those behind the coup and demonstrations attempt with arrests if they cross the read line, hinting at the old elite (two former presidents Serzh Sargsyan and Robert Kocharyan who have close ties to the Kremlin).

“Those who robbed people will not return”.

“If somebody goes beyond the line of political statements, they will be arrested”.

Meanwhile, Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow was monitoring the situation in Armenia with “concern”.