Decline and fall

The St. Petersburg Times
#1010, Friday, October 8, 2004

ARTS + FEATURES

Decline and fall

By Matthew Duncan
SPECIAL TO THE ST. PETERSBURG TIMES

It’s a tough old game, civilization. No sooner does one empire set itself
up, than another one comes along, knocks it off its perch and sets up shop
in the ruins. The same ruthlessness seems to operate in the world of dining
out. If you had ventured behind the ornately carved doors of the
recently-opened Armenian restaurant about the same time last year, you would
have found yourself in a recently-opened African restaurant. Like most
conquerors, these ones haven’t bothered to do much with the décor. You have
to assume that the new management were either working within a limited
budget or thought the African theme, with pots half submerged in the walls
and wattle roofing over the cloakroom area, too good to waste.
We took a table by the large street windows and listened to the acceptably
pitched ballroom synth-pop. We asked for an English menu, but they didn’t
have one, and, happily, each dish has a photograph alongside sit on the
Russian-language menu they do have.

There is a good choice of soups, fish, prawns and so on in the 60 to
150-ruble ($2 to $3.44) range. For starters I ordered a vegetable dish
called “Adjab Sandal” (80 rubles, $2.75). My companion chose an ‘assortment
of fish’ (100 rubles, $3.44). The Adjab Sandal was a disappointment. Roughly
the same size as the photo in the menu, it tasted just like cold pizza
topping (which isn’t necessarily a bad thing in other circumstances). The
assorted fish was no better and, staring at the bits of fish lying flaccidly
on the plate, one can only conclude that not much thought was given to its
preparation.

Choosing a main course was tricky. Everything looked extraordinarily, some
might say suspiciously, appetizing. There is a page of fish and a page of
meat, a range of kebabs, some things called tavas and some tempting looking
pizzas at the back.

Most items are priced between 150 and 250 rubles. My companion ordered duck
breast (220 rubles, $7.60). It looked great. Succulent slices of duck breast
were temptingly nestled on a bed of fried potatoes with a row of ripe
raspberries lying alongside like a discarded item of clothing. On the other
side of the plate, a limp green salad looked jealously on. It was tasty, and
the raspberry actually worked. We demolished it in seconds. My main course
came with a weight of expectations upon it. I had ordered the biblical
sounding Tava “Ararat” (220 rubles, $7.60), a tomato-based stew filled with
peppers and beans and mushrooms and promisingly large chunks of lamb.
Regrettably, upon closer examination, the meat was mostly fat or bone, so we
were left with what was essentially a vegetable casserole.

The place was starting to fill up with underdressed girls. The barman was
working so frenetically that I thought the president had arrived while I
wasn’t looking. I asked if the barman could make a Singapore Sling. After
two minutes agonizing with his conscience, he decided that he could.

At that point we were joined by an unexpected visitor: the bill. A bit
premature, perhaps? Our efficient waitress, Nadezhda, informed us that it
was “the system.” You can’t fight the system. But could one order dessert?
She went for the menu. Let’s see: ice cream, “night and day cake,” banana
split, all priced between 40 and 100 rubles ($1.30 and $3.40). What should
we have? Maybe it was already written on the bill. No, the bill had vanished
again. My expensive, inevitably ghastly cocktail (240 rubles, $8.20)
arrived. I decided to go for the banana split (90 rubles, $3.10), because I
was still hungry. It wasn’t bad and at least had plenty of ice cream.

The bill came back for an encore. By now the music was loud and it seems
there is a Latin disco here on Saturday nights. Behind our table at the
entrance, there was now a cash register – people were paying to get in! We
paid and got out. It wasn’t that good and it wasn’t that cheap. I wondered
how much it would cost to bankroll an African revolution.

Armenia, 3 Ulitsa Lomonosova. Tel 310 2230, All major credit cards accepted.
Menu in Russian only.
Dinner for two with wine: 1,340 rubles ($46.20).

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Italian & Azerbaijani FMs Note on S. Caucasus Instability Factors

FACTORS OF POTENTIAL INSTABILITY OBSERVED IN CAUCASIAN REGION
ALONGSIDE WITH POSITIVE DEVELOPMENT: FORIEGN MINISTERS OF ITALY AND
AZERBAIJAN

YEREVAN, OCTOBER 7. ARMINFO. Factors of potential instability are
observed in the Caucasian region alongside with positive
development. Foriegn Ministers of Italy and Azerbaijan, Franco
Frattini and Elmar Mamedyarov, made such a statement during their
meeting in Rome yesterday, Day. Az reports, referring to the Italian
Foriegn Ministry.

According to the information spread by the Italian Foriegn Ministry,
the visit of the Azerbaijani FM is within the framework of the
implementation of a policy of strengthened dialogue with the Caucasian
states, which was initiated by Franco Frattini in June, 2004 in
Tbilisi. It will be continued in the course of the forthcoming visit
of Armenian Foreign Minister to Rome within the coming weeks. The
recent decision by the EU to expand its policy of new neighborhood in
the Caucasian region considerably strengthens the relations of the
countries of this region and the European continent. It is another
stimulus for Italy to intensify its bilateral relations as well, the
Italian Foriegn Ministry reports.

HH Karekin II Receives the Newly Appointed Ambassador of Finland

PRESS RELEASE
Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, Information Services
Address: Vagharshapat, Republic of Armenia
Contact: Rev. Fr. Ktrij Devejian
Tel: (374 1) 517 163
Fax: (374 1) 517 301
E-Mail: [email protected]
October 8, 2004

His Holiness Karekin II Receives the Newly Appointed Ambassador of Finland

On September 14, His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos
of All Armenians, received Mrs. Terhi Hakala, newly appointed Ambassador
Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Finland to the Republic
of Armenia. Mr. Vladimir Karmirshalian, Ambassador of Armenia to the
Republic of Finland, the Kingdom of Denmark and the Kingdom of Norway,
accompanied the Ambassador on her visit to the Mother See of Holy
Etchmiadzin.

Wishing the Ambassador success and productive service in her new position,
His Holiness discussed the cooperation between Armenia and Finland in
various spheres. The Pontiff of All Armenians expressed hope that the
cooperation and relations between the two countries would continue to grow
and develop for the benefit of both nations. During the course of the
meeting, His Holiness reflected on his recent visit to Finland and to the
Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland, which was upon the invitation of the
Most Reverend Dr. Jukka Paarma, Archbishop of Turku and all Finland.

Thanking the Catholicos for the warm reception, Ambassador Hakala remarked
on the implementation of projects which would contribute to the fostering of
relationships and cooperation between Armenia and Finland.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

AFNL: EC Recommendation concerning Turkey afraid of litmus test

PRESS RELEASE
Federation of Armenian Organizations in The Netherlands
April 24 Committee
For Recognition and Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide of 1915
Contact: Mrs. I. Drost
Tel. 070 4490209
E-mail: [email protected]
K.v.K. 27264382

Armenian Federation: EC Recommendation concerning Turkey afraid of litmus
test

The Hague, 7 October 2004 – With concern, the Armenian Federation learned of
the recommendation of the European Commission concerning Turkey, which is
both premature with green light for negotiations and has serious
shortcomings on a number of points and particularly on important matters for
Armenians.

The Armenian Federation cannot share the conclusion of the Commission to
give conditional green light to Turkey for commencing the negotiations when
this is against the background of such a large number of shortcomings in the
areas of among others human rights, rights of minorities, freedom of
religion and freedom of expression. Moreover, a large section of observed
progress has not yet been implemented. In fact, in this respect, almost none
of the Copenhagen criteria have been effectively met, whereas according to
the agreement with Turkey a date for negotiations would only be set if this
would be the case.

In the opinion of the Federation, the European Council can do nothing more
but to postpone the decision in December concerning the question of whether
or not to commence the negotiations.

Specifically concerning the Armenians, the recommendation of the Commission
has shortcomings on a number of points.

– The recommendation bypasses with great deviation the Armenian problems and
thereby misses a unique opportunity to bring the solution of these problems
a step closer. It takes a distance from the problems of the denial of the
Armenian Genocide, which is conducted strongly by the Turkish government
(and on the homepage of each government site) up to the present. The
solution of this question does not lie in the ignorance of the requirements
for a democratic rule of law. In Turkey, however, this issue is a complete
taboo and therefore it is pre-eminently suitable as a “litmus test” to find
out whether Turkey is ready or not for the negotiations. However, Verheugen
has not carried out this litmus test. As such, the impression is given that
this matter is again buried, not only for the Armenians inside and outside
of Turkey, but also for the Turkish reformists who need European support for
opening discussion on this dragging issue.

– Thereby it is striking that the recommendation of the Commission
absolutely does not mention the Armenian element anywhere, nor as a
minority, nor concerning religion, nor as a neighboring country etc. This is
even more remarkable as other questions are mentioned with appropriate
terms. As a result, the Armenian matter is threatened to be swept under the
rug.

– Where a lot of questions are raised clearly for discussion in the
recommendation, like matters concerning torture, the fact that Turkey keeps
the border with Armenia closed and does not wish to maintain diplomatic
relations with Armenia is mentioned nowhere. Leaving the problems with
Armenia undefined leads to a cryptic description of the good relation with
neighboring countries required by Europe. The Commission then states that
“The prospect of accession should lead to improving bilateral relations
between Turkey and its neighbours in line with principles of reconciliation
on which the European Union is founded². The question is whether such a
vague formulation can give sufficient impetus to Turkey to act upon the
necessary conditions concerning the border with Armenia.

– The Commission identifies that the new Penal Code provides only limited
progress as regards, for example, freedom of expression. The Federation
hereby points out, for example, Article 306 of the new Penal Code, which
states that activities against national interests are liable to a fine.
According to information of the Federation, the remarks in this Article
mention as examples such activities as stating that the Armenian genocide
took place and speaking of withdrawal of the Turkish army from Cyprus.
Irregardless, it is obvious that guarantees are necessary for open
discussions of loaded subjects in Turkey as regards the changes that the
Commission supports, for instance concerning the requested reconciliation
with neighboring states. However, these guarantees are entirely lacking. As
such, the denial of the Armenian Genocide remains the cornerstone of Turkish
policy, in which neither changes nor reconciliation are be to expected. With
respect to Cyprus the mentioned remarks are alien to the Turkish promise to
seek for a reunited Cyprus.

With this position, the recommendation does not take into account about a
million Europeans of Armenian descent whose presence in Europe is a direct
consequence of Turkey¹s actions in the past. Moreover, it does not render
justice to the recognition of the Armenian Genocide by many European Member
States and the European Parliament.

The attitude of Turkey regarding the Armenian Genocide does not fit in the
norms and values community which Europe wants to be and thus it cannot be
left to its own devices without the EU considering to reject it.

The Armenian Federation calls on the European leaders to refuse green light
for the negotiations on December 17 without clear promises to end the denial
of the Armenian genocide by Turkey, so that a first step can be taken to the
highly necessary reconciliation with Armenia and with it to bring an end to
the tensions of the border with Armenia.

After Nine Decades: The Enduring Legacy of the Armenian Genocide

PRESS RELEASE
AEF Chair in Modern Armenian History
Richard Hovannisian
Department of History
University of California
Los Angeles, California 90095-1473
U.S.A.

An International Conference

After Nine Decades: The Enduring Legacy of the Armenian Genocide

CALL FOR PAPERS
Please Submit Proposals by December 1, 2004

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
April 2-3, 2005

Dear Colleagues:

The year 2005 marks the 90th anniversary of the onset of the Armenian
Genocide. Commemorative events, including a number of conferences, will
be held in many locations around the world. It is fitting that such a
conference should be held in Southern California.

I am interrupting the ongoing UCLA semi-annual conference series on
Historic Armenian Cities and Provinces to organize a conference on the
Enduring Legacy of the Armenian Genocide, to be held on the UCLA campus
on the Saturday and Sunday, April 2-3, 2005.

Presentations will be made in thematic panels, such as (but not limited to):

– Evolving Historiography and Understanding of the Armenian Genocide;
– Dynamics of State-Sponsored versus Independent Turkish Historiography;
– Armenian Genocide in the Arts and Literature;
– Armenian Genocide in Education;
– Gender, Age, and Genocide;
– Medical, Psychological, and Trans-Generational Aspects;
– Religion, Ethics, and Genocide;
– Political and Moral Aspects of Denial and Remembrance;
– Armenian Genocide in Comparative Perspective;
– Impact of the Genocide on Foreign Relations of the Republic of Armenia;
– Models for Armenian-Turkish Dialogue and Movement toward Conciliation.

Proposals for organized panels of three or four papers around a
particular theme are most welcome.

Please submit by December 1 proposals or abstracts of 300-400 words for
individual papers and of 500 words for organized panel with three or
more participants.

Kindly send them to me by e-mail at [email protected]
Telephone: 310-825-3375
FAX: 310-206-9630

For persons so requiring, there will be partial funding available for
travel and local accommodations.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

RUSAL raises investments in foil unit to $70 mln

RUSAL raises investments in foil unit to $70 mln

MOSCOW, Oct 8 (Reuters) – Russian top aluminium producer RUSAL will
increase investments in modernisation of its Armenian foil unit,
ARMENAL, to $70 million from previously planned $34 million, RUSAL
said on Friday.

“More sizeable than initially planned the programme will allow RUSAL
ARMENAL to improve the quality of foil products and raise the plant’s
profitability,” A RUSAL statement said.

RUSAL will invest $25 million of its own funds into the Armenian plant
and will take a $45 million long-term loan from a group of German
banks, headed by Bayerische Landesbank.

RUSAL has appointed German firm Achenbach GmbH as contractor to
produce a feasibility study and to implement the modernisation
programme.

The upgrade will permit ARMENAL to produce up to 25,000 tonnes of foil
per year including 18,000 tonnes of expensive thin foil. The first 150
tonnes of foil will be produced by the end of 2005.

ARMENAL produced 9,614 tonnes of foil in the first nine months of
2003. The plant has been idle since November 2003.

10/08/04 09:27 ET

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

AAA: Cosigners to Congressional Letter to President Bush

Armenian Assembly of America
122 C Street, NW, Suite 350
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:

October 8, 2004
CONTACT: Christine Kojoian
E-mail: [email protected]

****************************************************************

The Armenian Assembly would like to call to your attention the list of U.S.
Representatives who have signed onto a congressional letter urging President
Bush to denounce Azerbaijan’s ongoing war-mongering towards Armenia and
Nagorno Karabakh.

Ackerman, Gary (D-NY)
Andrews, Robert (D-NJ)
Becerra, Xavier (D-CA)
Berkley, Shelley (D-NV)
Berman, Howard (D-CA)
Bilirakis, Michael (R-FL)
Bradley, Jeb (R-NH)
Capuano, Michael (D-MA)
Cardoza, Dennis (D-CA)
Conyers, John, Jr. (D-MI)
Costello, Jerry (D-IL)
Crowley, Joe (D-NY)
DeLauro, Rosa (D-CT)
DeMint, Jim (R-SC)
Ehlers, Vernon (R-MI)
Eshoo, Anna (D-CA)
Feeney, Tom (R-FL)
Filner, Bob (D-CA)
Foley, Mark (R-FL)
Frank, Barney (D-MA)
Garrett, Scott (R-NJ)
Hinchey, Maurice (D-NY)
Honda, Michael (D-CA)
Israel, Steve (D-NY)
Jackson, Jesse, Jr. (D-IL)
Kelly, Sue (R-NY)
Kennedy, Patrick J. (D-RI)
Kirk, Mark (R-IL)
Kleczka, Gerald (D-WI)
Knollenberg, Joe (R-MI)
Langevin, James (D-RI)
Levin, Sander (D-MI)
Lowey, Nita (D-NY)
Lynch Stephen (D-MA)
Maloney, Carolyn (D-NY)
Markey, Edward (D-MA)
McCarthy, Karen (D-MO)
McCollum, Betty (D-MN)
McCotter, Thaddeus (R-MI)
McGovern, James P. (D-MA)
McNulty, Michael (D-NY)
Meehan, Martin (D-MA)
Miller, Candice (R-MI)
Moran, James (D-VA)
Napolitano, Grace (D-CA)
Nunes, Devin (R-CA)
Pallone, Frank, Jr. (D-NJ)
Peterson, Collin (D-MN)
Porter, Jon (R-NV)
Price, David (D-NC)
Radanovich, George (R-CA)
Rogers, Michael (R-MI)
Rothman, Steve (D-NJ)
Roybal-Allard, Lucille (D-CA)
Rush, Bobby (D-IL)
Sanchez, Loretta (D-CA)
Saxton, Jim (R-NJ)
Schiff, Adam (D-CA)
Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. (R-FL)
Shays, Christopher (R-CT)
Sherman, Brad (D-CA)
Shimkus, John (R-IL)
Souder, Mark (R-IN)
Sweeney, John (R-NY)
Tubbs Jones, Stephanie (D-OH)
Upton, Fred (R-MI)
Van Hollen, Chris, Jr. (D-MD)
Visclosky, Peter (D-IN)
Waxman, Henry (D-CA)
Weiner, Anthony (D-NY)
Wilson, Joe (R-SC)
Wynn, Albert (D-MD)

The Armenian Assembly of America is the largest Washington-based nationwide
organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian
issues. It is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership organization.

NR#2004-092

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.armenianassembly.org

Russia Blocked Georgia and Armenia From Land and Sea

RUSSIA BLOCKED GEORGIA AND ARMENIA FROM LAND AND SEA

Will Kocharian and Saakashvili Discussed the Matter in Tbilisi Meeting

Azg/am
9 Oct 04

The Russian-Georgian border was closed de facto on September 1 and
only on September 15 an official order was issued. The Armenian side
was officially informed only on September 20 when the number of
vehicles waiting to cross the border reached 1000. No warning as to
border crossing closure was sent beforehand.

Georgia states that the border is open at the Upper Lars checkpoint
from the Georgian side. “Border is open from the Georgian side and
closed from the Russian. We are ready to provide the Armenian vehicles
with services neededfor crossing. Last time Russia opened the border
crossing for 2 hours was the period from September 9-12”, Kakha
Mikeladze, customs official at the Northern checkpoint, informed Azg
Daily.

On September 12 Russia closed also seaways for Georgia and
Armenia. According to the information we have, Russia stopped cargo
transportation from Poti to Novorosiysk for cargo boat repairing
lasting two weeks.

The two weeks have long ago expired. Now Russia explains that cargo
transportation between Poti and Novorosiysk will resume no sooner than
October 18. Arsen Ghazarian, head of Apaven Company, informed us that
the closed seawaywas the only one providing transportation to the
Company.

20 percent of Armenian goods were conveyed through the closed Upper
Lars checkpoint. This route becomes impassable in winter. Today the
important thing is to take the vehicles out from Darial gorge before
the first snow.

The Russian side does not define any terms for the border
opening. “The embassy has nothing to do with border closing. I have no
information on this”, was the only answer we received from the Russian
embassy to Georgia.

Russian press is full of information blaming Georgia for preventing
vehicles from Armenia to cross the border. Armenian mass media and
some officials seem to trust Russian press and declare that Russia
opened the border after president Kocharian’s phone conversation with
Vladimir Putin, whereas Georgia did not send green light.

In fact, Russia kept open only the Roki tunnel’s section of the
border. Armenians were allowed to enter South Ossetia where new
problems appeared connected with Georgian-Ossetian
confrontation. Georgia declared many times that there is only one
legal checkpoint between Russia and Georgia, i.e. Upper Lars.

The Russian side, in fact, invites Armenians to South Ossetia having
in mind that they will never cross the border. Allowing Armenians to
pass through Roki tunnel, Russia puts Georgia in a strange
position. The latter does not recognize this border crossing and does
not let Armenians pass it.

Those issues may top the meeting agenda of Robert Kocharian and
Mikheil Saakashvili. According to the press office of the president of
Georgia, president Kocharian will arrive in Tbilisi on October
22-24. The aim of the visit andthe framework of issues to be discussed
were not revealed.

By Tatoul Hakobian and Aghavni Harutyunian from Tbilisi

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

MP Upbeat on Armenia’s Benefits From Turkey’s EU Admission

MP UPBEAT ON ARMENIA’S BENEFITS FROM TURKEY’S EU ADMISSION

Mediamax news agency
8 Oct 04

YEREVAN

Turkey’s EU admission is beneficial to Armenia, Galust Saakyan,
chairman of the Republican Party parliamentary faction, said in
Yerevan today.

Speaking at the National Press Club, Saakyan said that if Turkey
joined the EU, Armenia would border the EU directly.

”Turkey’s EU admission can contribute to the opening of the border
with Armenia,” Saakyan said. He added that the European community was
determined to succeed in opening the Turkish-Armenian border, and “if
not today, it will be opened tomorrow”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

The Christian religion(s) of the Middle East

Hellenic News of America
Oct 3 2004

THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION(S) OF THE MIDDLE EAST

A question of Belief

Rev. Dr. Miltiades B. Efthimiou, Protopresbyter
Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople

PROLOGUE

The recent bombings of Christian Churches in Iraq prompts us to ask,
is there a Christian religion or even a Christian minority in Iraq
and even in the Middle East? The following study is an overview of
these Christian religions in this troubled area following a trip to
this area along with members of the National Council of Churches
several years ago.

In my capacity as Ecumenical Officer for both the Greek Orthodox
Archdiocese of North and South America and the Standing Conference of
Canonical Orthodox Bishops in the Americas (SCOBA), it was apparent
that western peoples must begin to understand the religious
complexities of the Middle East at a time when religious
confrontation and extremism become increasingly a mark of our times.
Christian, Muslim and Jewish peoples are confronting one another at
an alarming rate.

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of Christians,
Moslems and Jews, as well as an overview of the Christian Churches of
the Middle East. This is a tentative undertaking, since momentous
changes on a daily basis, further complicate a critical understanding
by most Americans of the Middle East and its religious orientation,
because of their unfamiliarity with religions and cultures that are
not western or Christian. For example, sectarian identities have
often been subjected to the manipulation of clerical as well as
political leaders, all in the name of power and/or a Supreme Being.
And these leaders, (Jewish, Moslem Shiite, Moslem Sunni or Kurdish,)
are subject to their national identities. For Moslems, though,
`national identities are not fixed’, said professor S. Kransner of
Stanford University. Indeed, it is rightfully suggested that Shia,
Iraqi, Arab Muslims, choose identities depending on circumstances and
which will benefit them in the long run. Jews are in this mix. The
Christians of the Middle East, a distinct minority, are in this mix.
(See the second part of this article for a thorough discussion of the
Christian churches of the Middle East.)

To understand the complexities of this issue, one needs to understand
the three non-Jewish main ethnic groups:

SUNNI MUSLIMS: This sect is comprised of about 85% of the
worldʼs Muslims.37% are Iraqi. They believe that the first four
Caliphs, (highest religious rulers), were the rightful successors to
the prophet Mohammed. Saddam Hussein is Sunni.

SHIITE MUSLIMS; They represent about 60% of the Iraqi population,
and, therefore, are the dominant religious sect of this region. They
reject the authority of the first three caliphs and claim that the
true leaders of Islam descend from Ali, the fourth caliph, son-in-law
of Mohammed.

KURDS; a non-Arabic people, they are the largest ethnic group in the
world without their own homeland. Kurds are concentrated to the north
of Iraq and to the south of Turkey. Kurds are made up of Sunnis and
Shiites.

Would an alliance of all Moslems help in the peace process in the
Middle East? It would depend, as professor Krasner suggests, not so
much on a sense of nationalism, but the ability to work out a
power-sharing arrangement which would be beneficial to everyone,
including Jews.

For all concerned, efforts to bring all groups together in a serious
way, could reduce the spread of Middle East nationalism and tensions.
Understanding the religions of the Middle East will help speed the
process.

I am indebted to the Middle East Council of Churches and to Fr.
Ronald G. Robersonʼs work The Eastern Christian Churches – A
Brief Survey (1993 edition). I would also recommend Dialogue With
People of Other Christian Faiths, prepared by the Division of
Overseas Ministries of the National Council of Churches of Christ,
U.S.A. I would also recommend the book, God is One, by R. Marston
Speight, second edition.

THE CHRISTIANS OF THE MIDDLE EAST*

The churches of the Middle East can be grouped into 5 families
representing about 15 million Christians (approximately 9 million
residing in the Middle East). The largest is the family of Oriental
Orthodox Churches – the Coptic Orthodox Church in Egypt, the Armenian
Apostolic Church living in various Arab countries in addition to the
Armenians of the Republic of Armenia; and the Syrian Orthodox Church.
Each is fully self-governing, though they are in communion with one
another.
The second family of churches is the Byzantine Orthodox Churches.
They are often referred to as Eastern or Greek Orthodox. They
constitute three sell-governing churches, linked by doctrine, liturgy
and canon law with the Ecumenical Patriarchate in Istanbul (formerly
Byzantium or Constantinople), and belong, therefore, to that wider
family of Orthodox churches in Russia, eastern Europe and elsewhere.
The third family comprises the Catholic churches of the Middle East.
These churches all accept the supreme ecclesiastical authority of the
Pope and the doctrine of the Catholic Church. But only a small
percentage of them are Roman, or Latin-Catholic. Most of them can be
grouped together as the Eastern-rite Catholic Churches – the word
`rite’ denoting their forms of liturgy and canon law which differ
from the western Latin rite of the Roman Catholics. The largest of
these churches is the Maronite Church in Lebanon.
The fourth family is in terms of independent history, one of the
oldest and most self-contained in the Middle Eastern churches: the
Assyrian Church of the East. Sometimes identified by its historical
tradition as the Church of the `East Syrians’ or the Church of
Persia. It exists in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.
The fifth family comprises the Anglican, Lutheran and Protestant
Churches, like the Eastern-rite Catholic Churches (possibly excepting
the Maronite Church), these churches came into being as a result of
western missionary activity in the Middle East. Whereas the
Eastern-rite Catholic Churches mostly go back several centuries, this
family of churches dates in the Middle East from as recently as the
19th century.

The Apostles and their churches

In the earliest years of Christian history churches were founded in
various parts of the Middle East and the Mediterranean world where
the Apostles travelled as missionaries of the Gospel. In the West we
attribute the foundation of the Church of Rome to St. Peter and St.
Paul, and in the New Testament we read the letters of St. Paul to
several of the early Christian communities with which he was linked
in Greece and western Turkey. We also read of the Church in
Jerusalem, led by St. James the brother of John, and the Church in
Antioch, in the north-western corner of Syria where St. Peter and St.
Paul are said to have created a community of Christians which soon
became one of the flourishing centers of Christianity. St. Thomas is
also associated by tradition with Antioch, though his missionary
travels took him eastward through Central Asia and India. So also St.
Bartholomew who travelled northward through eastern Turkey and
Armenia. Another important Christian center was at Alexandria in
Egypt where St. Mark is said to have preached among his kinsmen, the
Copts, from whose name we derive the words `Egypt’ and `Egyptian’.
Further south in Africa, St. Matthew is believed to have founded the
Church in Ethiopia.
While it may be difficult to verify all these traditions by
historical criteria, they have been and remain fundamental to the
self-understanding of the eastern churches throughout the ages. It is
for this reason that they speak of themselves as being truly
`apostolic’.
These 15 million Christians represent only a tiny minority of the
total population of the Middle East (about 10%), the great majority
of whom are Muslim. The churches vary from one another, historically,
doctrinally, and culturally, and this produces sometimes different
views of the Arab Muslim world in which they live. But the quality of
their living traditions is not to be measured in terms of their
numbers, nor is their significance to be belittled because of their
differences. In our ecumenical age of deepening fellowship between
all parts of the Christian Church, and of growing dialogue with
Muslims, these churches demand to be understood in their own terms,
no longer under the prejudicial stereotypes of `ancient’, or
`schismatic’, or `younger’ (i.e. recently converted), or foreign’.

THE FIVE `CHURCH’ FAMILIES IN THE MIDDLE EAST

The following survey of the churches of the Middle East, groups them
into five ʽfamiliesʼ: Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox,
Catholic and Protestant churches, and the Assyrian Church of the
East.

The Oriental (non-Chalcedonian) Orthodox
Churches
The greatest number of Christians in the Middle East Belong to the
churches of the Oriental Orthodox family. The largest of these is the
Coptic Orthodox Church in Egypt. The others are: The Armenian
Apostolic Church. seated in the Lebanese coastal town of Antilias,
north of Beirut, and the Syrian Orthodox Church, seated in Damascus.
Ethnically and culturally these three churches are in many ways
different, each being identified with its own people or nation. The
Armenian Church traces its origins to the missionary Apostles
Thadaeus and Bartholomew. It has since remained the central
institution of Armenian nationhood and nationalism.
The Copts trace their descent from the Pharaonic Egyptians. Their
conversion to Christianity began with the North African preaching of
St. Mark whom they recognize as the first Patriarch of Alexandria.
But it took three centuries of persecution before the Coptic Church
established itself in Egypt. The desert monasticism, following the
rules of St. Antony and St. Pachomeus, attracted many other
Christians to visit Egypt. Their missionary activity in Africa led to
the Christianization of much of Nubia, the Sudan and Ethiopia.
Weakened by the withdrawal eastwards of the Assyrian Church, the
remaining `Western Syrians’ felt themselves abused by the Council of
Chalcedon and raffled to the anti-Chalcedonian teaching of the 6th
century Jacob (Yaqub) alBaradaʼi after whom the Syrian Orthodox
Church is sometimes labeled `Jacobite’.
Notwithstanding such differences, however, these three Oriental
Orthodox Churches have in the early centuries struggled to uphold
their nationsʼ interests against the imperial presence of the
Byzantine and the Persian Empires. With the rise of the Islamic
Empire in the 7th century A.D. they fell under a new form of
religio-political power which, for the next five centuries, largely
improved their situation. The Muslims treated the Christians as a
single group, irrespective of the doctrinal differences between
Assyrian, Oriental and Byzantine Orthodox Churches, and looked to
them to provide the cadre of the `civil service’ in the Islamic
Caliphate.
This situation was imperiled, however, by the intrusion of the
western Christian Crusaders from the 11th to the 13th centuries, and
led to periodic persecution and social marginalization of all the
eastern Christians as the Mongol dynasties seized control of the
Caliphate. From the 14th to the early 20th centuries, therefore, the
eastern churches lived as `closed communities’, isolated within
Islamic society and cut off from the church in the West.
The breach between these churches and the Byzantine family of
churches occurred in 451 at the Council of Chalcedon, and thus they
accept the authority of only the first three ecumenical councils.
For many centuries the non-Chalcedonian churches lived more or less
in isolation from the rest of Christendom and, for political and
geographical reasons, even from one another. However, for the first
time since the 6th century they held a conference of the Heads of the
Oriental Orthodox Churches in Addis Ababa in 1965. Since then they
have drawn closer together in fellowship and joint planning. They are
presently in official negotiation with the `Chalcedonian’ Eastern
Orthodox family of churches on Christology and `Chalcedonian’ unity
and are active members of the World Council of Churches (WCC) and the
Middle East Council of Churches (MECC).

The Armenian Apostolic Church
Catholicosate of Cilicia

The Armenian Apostolic Church, known also as Armenian Orthodox, has a
distinctive ethnical, cultural and historical background from the
churches referred to in this issue.
Diaspora has been a permanent aspect of Armenian history. Since the
dawn of their history, the Armenians, for one reason or another, have
emigrated. However, forced and massive emigration only began in the
10th century, with the successive occupation of Armenia by
Byzantines, Seljuk Turks, Persians, Ottomans and Russians.
Deportation and migration continued in succeeding centuries. But none
of the mass deportations of earlier years equaled those that took
place in the period 1915-1922. Over one and a half million Armenians
were massacred in Turkey and the rest deported to the Syrian deserts.
At present they are about two million and can be found almost
anywhere on the globe, mostly in Middle Eastern countries, the USA
and Canada, South America, southern and western Europe and Australia.
The church in diaspora has three centers: 1. The Catholicosate of
Cilicia, reestablished and reorganized in Antelias, Lebanon in 1930.
With its diocesan administrative organization, theological seminary
and world-wide ecumenical relations, it is the de facto spiritual
centers of the Armenian diaspora. It also plays a significant role in
the cultural, social and political life of the nation. Its
jurisdiction now covers Lebanon, Syria (Aleppo, Qamishli), Cyprus,
Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, Iran, Greece and half of the
Armenian communities in North America. 2. The Patriarchate of
Constantinople; and 3. the Patriarchate of Jerusalem, both of them
related to the Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin, in the former Soviet
Republic of Armenia.
The Armenian Apostolic Church in Lebanon is a strong community of
150,000 members who are now fully integrated into the Lebanese
society. The school of theology at Bikfaya, founded in 1930, provides
new clergy and also furnishes priests to serve the diaspora
communities falling under its jurisdiction.
The Armenian Orthodox are the third largest Christian community in
Syria, after the Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholic churches. They
number 100,000.
The Armenian Apostolic Church is the largest Christian community in
Iran. Armenians were established in Iran mainly in 1605 when Shah
Abbas forced hundreds of thousands of Armenians to leave their
homeland and migrate to Iran. Presently the church has three dioceses
with a total of 170,000 membersThe Armenian Church has 3,500 members
in Cyprus. Armenians have lived on the island since the 11th century.
The Armenian Apostolic Church in Kuwait and the Emirate has about
12,000 members. Large communities of Armenians live in Europe (in
France there are 350,000 members), in
the USA and Canada 600,000.

The Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin

Located in Armenia, the Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin is the spiritual
center for the Armenians living there. It also has jurisdiction on
communities in the Middle East (Iraq and Egypt), France, USA, South
America and Australia.
The existence of two Catholicosates with the Armenian Church: the
Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin (Catholicosate of All Armenians in
former Soviet Armenia) and the Catholicosate of Cilicia, Antelias,
Lebanon is due to historical circumstances. The diocese of Baghdad,
Iraq, is related to the Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin and counts
15,000 members. The diocese of Egypt is related also the
Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin and has 20,000 members.

The Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople
The Armenian Patriarchate of Constantinople with its See at Istanbul,
Turkey, is dependent on the Catholicosate of Etchmiadzin. The
faithful (80,000) are concentrated in Istanbul, where 35 of the
Patriarchateʼs parishes are located. The Patriarchate was
recognized in 1461 by the Ottoman authorities as the sole legal
representative of all Armenians in the Empire, including those within
the jurisdiction of the Silesian Catholic sate.

The Armenian Patriarchate of Jerusalem

This church is the largest among the four oriental Orthodox churches
in Palestine: Armenian, Coptic, Syrian, Ethiopian. Armenian churches
existed in Jerusalem since the 5th century. Spiritually the
Patriarchate depends on the Catholic sate of Etchmiadzin. A very good
relationship exists with the Catholic sate of Cilicia. The
Patriarchate occupies the entire summit of Mt. Zion. It has 1,500
members. Between 1950 and 1973 almost 90% of the members emigrated.
The related church in Amman, Jordan, has 1,500 members.

The Coptic Orthodox Church
.
The Coptic Church is the largest Christian community in the Middle
East. It counts about 6,000,000 believers. It has some 45 dioceses in
Egypt, Africa, Middle East, Europe and the USA. 40 of these dioceses
are functioning in Egypt. There are Coptic churches in Kuwait,
Jordan, Jerusalem, Lebanon and Iraq. Jerusalem has an archdiocese
(established in the 9th century) with two congregations in Jaffa and
Nazareth. The churches in the other countries are related directly to
the Patriarchate. The diocese of the USA and Canada was founded in
the 1960ʼs. Twenty-four congregations in the USA and three in
Canada are formed mainly from Egyptian immigrants. Five parishes are
found in London, Paris, Vienna, Geneva and Frankfurt.

The Syrian Orthodox Church

This Church has its center in the Patriarchate of Antioch (at present
in Damascus, Syria) and counts about 160,000 believers. It is a
church which has contributed much to the blossoming of early
Christian literature and to the treasure of theological thinking,
spreading Christianity from the Byzantine Empire to the regions of
the Far East. An outstanding bishop was St. Jacob Baradaʼi
(500-578) (after whom the Syrian Orthodox were called `Jacobites’).
He revived the ritual life of the church in Syria, Egypt and Persia.
During the Mongol invasions of the 14th century, the church suffered
greatly. At the end of the 18th century its strength was further
reduced due to the establishment of a separate Uniate Syrian
Patriarchate (Syrian Catholics). At the turn of the present century
(1915-1920) the church was affected by Turko-Kurdish persecutions and
in the 1970ʼs by mass emigrations. The Seat of the Patriarchate,
after many moves over the centuries, was finally established in
Damascus, Syria, in 1954.
The Syrian Orthodox Catholic sate of the East was reestablished in
1964, after being vacant for centuries. Twelve dioceses are under its
jurisdiction. In the 1970ʼs a jurisdiction division occurred in
the church. One branch continues to recognize the spiritual supremacy
of the Patriarch of Antioch in Damascus and another branch installed
its independent Catholicose in Malabar.
There are now twelve dioceses related directly to the Patriarchate:
four in Syria, two in Iraq, two in Turkey, two in Lebanon, and one in
Jordan. Syrian Orthodox dioceses are found today in Europe (Holland
and Sweden), the USA and Canada, and two patriarchal vicariates in
Brazil and Argentina.

The Eastern (Byzantine) Orthodox Churches

The Eastern Orthodox Patriarchates of Constantinople (now Istanbul),
Alexandria, Antioch (now centered in Damascus) and Jerusalem belong
to the Byzantine tradition of Orthodoxy which also includes eleven
other autocephalous or self-governing churches: Russia, Romania,
Serbia, Greece, Bulgaria, Georgia, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Poland,
Albania and Sinai.
To distinguish them from the Oriental Orthodox Churches, the Eastern
Orthodox are also called Byzantine Orthodox, by reference to their
use of the Byzantine-rite liturgy of St. John Chrysostom; or
Chalcedonian Orthodox, be reference to the Ecumenical Council of
Chalcedon in 451 which condemned ʽmonophysitism’.
Others sometimes still describe them as Melkite-Orthodox, a reference
to their political allegiance to the Byzantine Emperor (`melik’ –
king) until the fall of Constantinople to Muslim conquest in 1453,
and their subordination to the authority of the Patriarch in
Constantinople during the Ottoman period. Another term, Greek
Orthodox, tends to be rather misleading as it wrongly suggests them
to be part of the Church of Greece, and draws attention away from the
fact that, in the Middle East, the great majority are Arab or
Arabized.
Eastern Orthodox Churches in the Middle East, as elsewhere, are
different from the Oriental (non-Chalcedonian) Orthodox in two
important respects. First of all, the Eastern Orthodox recognize the
authority of seven ecumenical councils: Nicea (325), Constantinople
(381), Ephesus (431), Chalcedon (451), Constantinople II (553),
Constantinople III (680), and Nicea II (787). The term ecumenical in
its root meaning is `the inhabited world’. As used with reference to
those councils, it means the Christian world of the fourth to the
eighth centuries. Secondly, Eastern Orthodox Churches recognize the
Patriarch of Constantinople as Ecumenical Patriarch. This is largely
an honorary primacy of `first among equals’ and quite different from
the Roman Catholic concept of papal authority, because each of the
churches in this group is entirely self-governing (autocephalous).

Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople

The history of Constantinople as a Patriarchate begins in 300, when
the Emperor Constantine I decided to move the seat of government from
Italy to the eastern region of his empire and chose this small town
of Byzantium along the Bosporus.
The Ecumenical Councils of Constantinople (381) conferred upon the
bishop of the city the second rank after the bishop of Rome. The
Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon (451) gave a definite shape to the
organization of the Church of Constantinople. From 520 onwards the
head of the church became known as the ecumenical patriarch.
The patriarchate holds jurisdiction over the faithful in Europe
(Great Britain, France, Germany, Austria, Italy, Sweden, Belgium,
Switzerland, the autonomous Church of Finland, and the Russian
Exarchy of Western Europe) and the Archbishoprics of Australia and
New Zealand. The Archbishop of the Americas (New York) governs the
Greek Orthodox Church of North and South America, also under the
jurisdiction of the ecumenical patriarch.
The ecumenical patriarchate was among the first to participate in the
formation and development of modern ecumenical movement and has been
involved in the WCC from its beginning. It has had a permanent
representative at the headquarters of the WCC in Geneva since 1955.
The patriarchate is currently involved in preparation for the Holy
and Great Synod of the Orthodox churches.

The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Alexandria and all Africa

The Patriarchate counts about 10,000 believers of Greek and
Syro-Lebanese extraction divided into 4 dioceses in Egypt
(Alexandria, Tanta, Cairo and Port Said), one in Sudan (Nubia), one
in Ethiopia (Axum) and one for cities in North Africa (including
Libya-Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco). The Patriarchate has received
new impetus from the establishment of new congregations in East and
Central Africa, which was principally brought about by the influx of
black African bishops of East Africa. Important dioceses (called also
`Archbishopric of the Mission of the Patriarchate’) have been
organized in Johannesburg and Cape Town in South Africa with 40,000
members. Harare, Zimbabwe 10,000 members, Kinshasa, Zaire 20,000
members, Nairobi, Kenya 40,000 members.
The second Ecumenical Council of Constantinople (381) ranked the
Patriarchate of Alexandria immediately after that of Constantinople.
After the Council of Chalcedon (451) there was a division, and part
of the church joined the `Cop-tic Orthodox’. The Church is governed
by the Patriarch in conjunction with the Synod. It recognized the
right of its members to worship in their own language, so liturgy is
celebrated in Greek in Greek churches and in Arabic in Egyptian
churches.

Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Jerusalem

The 4th Ecumenical Council of Chalcedon (451) granted this church the
status of `independent church’ and ranked it fourth after
Constantinople, Alexandria and Antioch. It became known as the
Patriarchate of Jerusalem. It has jurisdiction over Palestine and
Jordan and counts some 250,000 Arab believers. Church services are
held in Arabic and partly in Greek.

The Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch and
All the East

The Patriarchate saw its birth in the town in which the believers
were called, for the first time, `Christians’. At the end of the 6th
century, Antioch witnessed wars and political changes which continued
til 638 A.D. when it was conquered and the See of Constantinople
administered the church until the 15th century. In the 16th century,
the See was transferred to Damascus. The church was affected by
divisions occurring in the 18th century, when the Greek
Catholic-Melkite Church was founded in Mount Lebanon, In the late
19th century and beginning of our century, reforms were introduced in
the church and with the successive patriarchs the renaissance of the
church has continued to our days.
For liturgy and prayers, the Antiochian church uses the language of
the land: Arabic. It counts the largest number of believers rooted in
the Arabic population of the region. While it does not fully overlap
with the Arab nation in its entirety, the Orthodox Church of this
Patriarchate nevertheless is markedly Arab.
Today it counts about 1,300,000 Orthodox in the Middle East. Syria
has six organized dioceses (Damascus, Aleppo, Horns, Hama, Latakia,
Houran) with a total of 800,000 faithful. Lebanon also has six
dioceses (Beirut, Tripoli and Koura, Akkar, Zahle and Baalbeck, Tyre
and Sidon) with a total of about 400,000 members. The dioceses of
Iraq and Kuwait number 30,000 members. The Patriarchate extends to
the Arab-speaking Orthodox who live in the USA, Canada, Latin America
(Mexico, Chile, Brazil and Argentina), Australia and New Zealand with
about 1,000,000 members.

The Church of Cyprus

`Those who were scattered because of the persecution that arose over
Stephen traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus and Antioch’ (Acts
11:19). That was in 37 A.D. In 45 A.D., Paul and Barnabas, bringing
Mark with them, landed at Salamis and crossed the island of Paphos
where they con-vetted the Roman proconsul Sergius Paulus. Barnabas
later became the first Bishop of Cyprus.
The church grew rapidly, and Bishops from Salamis, Paphos and
Tremithus were present at the Council of Nicea (A.D. 325). The Church
of Cyprus received autocephalous (sell-governing) status at the
Council of Ephesus (431 A.D.) along with the Orthodox Patriarchates
of Antioch, Alexandria, Constantinople and Jerusalem.
During the Byzantine era, the Church suffered occasionally as a
result of Arab raids. Then, during the period of the crusades, while
the island was under Frankish rulers, and later, under the Venetians,
the Orthodox archbishops were replaced by Latin clergy. In 1571,
Turkish rule began on the island and in 1572 the Turks expelled the
Latin hierarchy and reinstalled the Orthodox leadership in
recognition of their help in the war against Venice.
Approximately 80% or more of the Cypriot minority is Byzantine
Orthodox, and there is virtually no aspect of the islandʼs
history and society that have not been touched by the Church of
Cyprus. For centuries, it acted as a kind of department for social
welfare, ministry of justice and ministry of education.
Following the 1974 invasion of Cyprus by Turkey, nearly 200,000 Greek
Cypriots were forced to leave their homes in the occupied areas and
became refugees. Their fate constitutes a primary concern of the
church. Two of the bishoprics, Kyrenia and Morphou, as well as
Nicosia, seat of the Archbishop, are partially or wholly within the
occupied territories.

The Church of Mount Sinai

The Emperor Justinian built the fortified monastery of St. Catherine
and the splendid basilica in 527. For the defense of the monks the
emperor sent two hundred Christian families from Romania and Egypt.
With the revival of Islam, they all converted to the new religion and
remained as vassals in the monastery compound coming to be known as
Jebelieh.
The monastery is famous with its library with more than 3,000
incunabula, 300 manuscripts in Greek and in other oriental languages,
Bibles, Gospels, sacred books and the picture gallery containing
precious icons of the 6th century.

(The conclusion in the Next (November) issue: The Catholic,
Evangelical and Apostolic Churches in the Middle East)

————————————————

THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION(S) OF THE MIDDLE EAST (Continued from the
October issue)

Rev. Dr. Miltiades B. Efthimiou, Protopresbyter
Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople

THE CATHOLIC CHURCHES

The Catholic Church of the semitic Orient is divided into seven
branches of different ethnic and cultural origins. About one half of
the believers of this Church live in the Middle East and the rest in
emigration.
Most Westerners use the term `Catholics’ and `Roman Catholics’ as
synonymous, the first being no more than a quicker form of the
second. But this is an incorrect usage, and from the point of view of
Catholics in the Middle East it is misleading. `Catholic’ is a
comprehensive term for all Christians who accept the spiritual
primacy of the Pope as the head of the Church. `Roman Catholic’
refers to those members of the Catholic Church who follow the `rite’
– that is, the form of liturgy and canon law – of the Patriarchal
Church of Rome. This is known as the Latin rite.
But the Latin rite is not the only rite of the Catholic Church, which
includes the Byzantine (or Melkite) rite, the Armenian rite, the
Syriac rite, and the Coptic rite. These are the eastern-Catholic
rites of that family ʽof Middle Eastern
churches which recognizes the sovereignty of the Pope and accept
Catholic doctrine.
The oldest and largest of the Catholic groups is the Maronite
Patriarchate which claims to have preserved its union with Rome since
the age of the ancient, undivided Church. Certainly there is no
Orthodox counterpart of the Maronites whereas the other five Eastern
Catholic Churches all broke away from the Assyrian or the Oriental
and Byzantine Orthodox Churches under the influence of Roman Catholic
missions of the Middle Ages. The earliest were the Chaldean Catholics
who broke away from the Assyrian Patriarchate in 1522, to establish
their own Catholic Patriarchate of Babylon in Baghdad. In 1622. the
Syrian Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch emerged, with its center
originally in Turkey, now in Beirut. Then, in 1724, a similiar
break-away took place within the Byzantine Orthodox Patriarchates of
Antioch, Jerusalem and Alexandria, resulting in the creation of the
Greek (or Melkite) Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch and all the East,
Alexandria and Jerusalem. Later in that century, in 1773, The
Armenian Catholic Patriarchate was created, with its center also in
Lebanon. Lastly came the creation of the Coptic Catholic Patriarchate
in Alexandria in 1824. These churches are in communion with the
Church of Rome and are related to the Vatican through the Sacred
Congregation for the Oriental Churches. This is why sometimes they
are called uniate churches.

The Chaldean Catholic Patriarchate of Babylon

The Chaldeans have the distinction of being the first uniate church
established under its own patriarchate in 1552. In that year, part of
the Assyrian community refused to accept the election of Simeon VIII
Denha as Patriarch of the Church of the East. They sent a monk named
Youhannan Soulaka to Rome where he was consecrated Patriarch of
Babylon.
Today the Chaldeans number 242,000 mainly living in Iraq, where they
form the largest Christian community. They are organized in 10
dioceses in Iraq, Iran (15,000 members), Syria (7,000 members), and
smaller communities in Egypt and the Lebanon.

The Armenian Catholic Patriarchate of Cilicia

The Armenian Catholic Patriarchate was established officially in
1840. A substantial number of Armenians had been converted to the
Latin-rite church at the beginning of the 14th century through the
efforts of Armenian Dominican fathers known as Fratres Unitores.
During the Turkish massacres at the turn of our century, the church
suffered severe losses. The church was reorganized in 1928 through a
synod held in Rome. The seat of the Patriarchate (originally in
Constantinople) was placed in Beirut, Lebanon. It bears the name
Armenian Catholic Patriarchate of Cilicia and has 35,000 members in
the Middle East. The Patriarchs take the name of Peter. The recent
Patriarch is John-Peter XVIII Kasparian.

The Maronite Patriarchate of Antioch

Maronite history began at the end of the 4th and beginning of the 5th
century. In 685 they elected a Patriarch of Antioch and by the
twelfth century united with Rome. Maronites are Eastern-rite
Catholics but not uniates in the same sense as the Melkite Chaldean,
Armenian and Syrian Catholic Churches whose reunion with Rome came
after centuries of alienation.
In the 9th century the Maronites sought refuge in the mountains of
Lebanon. The patriarchate moved to Bkerke in 1790 from the mountains
of Qannubin. Maronites living in Lebanon number today 1,200,000.
Those who have emigrated from the Middle East number as many as
6,500,000. There are 10 archdioceses and dioceses in the Middle East:
The Maronite liturgy is in Syriac and Arabic.

The Greek (Melkite) Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch

The word Melkite means `Kingʼs men’. It was used from the latter
part of the 5th century onward to designate all Christians who have
accepted the theological definitions of the Council of Chalcedon
which had also become the official position of the rulers in both the
Roman and Byzantine empires.
It is now used primarily with reference to this one Eastern-rite
Catholic Church which separated from the Eastern Orthodox
Patriarchates of Antioch, Alexandria and Jerusalem and was
established in union with Rome under its own patriarch in 1724. The
members are Arabic speaking and the liturgy is celebrated in Arabic.
The membership of the Greek Catholic Church is concentrated in the
Lebanon, Syria and Palestine.

The Syrian Catholic Patriarchate of Antioch

A part of the ancient Syrian Orthodox Church was reconstituted as an
Eastern-rite (uniate) Catholic church in 1662 through the influence
of Jesuit and Capuchin missionaries who had settled around Aleppo. In
1773, the presiding bishop of this faction was given the title of
Syrian Catholic Patriarch of Antioch. The Patriarchal See, located
for more than a century at Mardin, Turkey, was transferred to Beirut
in 1899. The Syrian Catholics have four dioceses in Syria and two in
Iraq. Patriarchal vicariates are in Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan and
Turkey. There is a widely scattered diaspora in the Americas and
elsewhere.
Liturgy is celebrated in the Syriac (Aramaic) language with
increasing use of Arabic in certain parts of the service. Syriac is
still a spoken language, particularly in some solidly Christian
villages and towns of eastern Syria and northern Iraq.

The Coptic Catholic Patriarchate of Alexandra

There have been Catholic Copts since the 17th century but no
patriarchate was established for them until 1824. This Church now has
some 100,000 members, by far the largest Catholic community in
present-day Egypt and the only one which is growing significantly in
size.

The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem

A Latin Patriarchate was first created in Jerusalem at the end of the
11th century and re-established there in 1847 by the Apostolic Letter
`Nulla Celebrior’ of Pope Pius IX. Numerous Roman Catholic missionary
orders have worked throughout the area, beginning with the
Franciscans in the 13th century. One response to this impact was the
emergence of Eastern-rite (Uniate) Churches. Even earlier than that,
however, was the establishment of Latin-rite dioceses which continue
into the present amidst the eastern churches.

The Assyrian Church of the East

A separate mention needs to be made concerning the Assyrian Church of
the East which remains outside all the other families of churches on
the alleged ground that it followed the teachings of the
excommunicated Nestorius.

Historical Background

The Assyrian Church is one of the oldest churches of the East. It has
been a missionary church as early as the first generation of
Christianity in Mesopotamia.
Its message went as far as India, China, Tibet and Mongolia. Its
presence linked the Mediterranean Sea to the West and India to the
East and due to its location East of the Roman Empire, it was called
`Eastern Church’, besides having been known by many other surnames,
among which the Church of Fares (Persia).
The Assyrian Eastern Church was one of the first churches to be
established. It has given many a martyr of faith, as it gave many
thinkers and scientists who greatly contributed to Arab culture. The
more regrettable it is that the fate of these people today is one of
poverty.
It was designated by the Arabs as the Nestorian Church, because it
was thought by some that the Assyrian Church was established by
Nestorius, who was the Patriarch of Constantinople in the 5th
century. In reality its See was in Salio, Katisphon (Al-Madaeʼn)
or Babel, at that time the Patriarch of this See being Mardad Yashu.
Thence, this church knew nothing about the theological argument that
was debated in the western part of the Roman Empire.
Already by the middle of the second century it was beginning to get
its independence from the Antiochian church. This independence
allowed its bishops the full power to consecrate patriarchs without
reference to Antioch.

Its Faith

The Eastern Church goes by the `Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed’
agreed upon in the First and Second Ecumenical Councils, calling for
one Church, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic.
The Eastern Church believes in the one God, the Holy Trinity, Father,
Son, and Holy Spirit and in Jesus Christ, totally God, and totally
Man, two natures and two hypostases in one person, and in the Virgin
birth of Christ, in one Baptism and in the Holy Spirit proceeding
from the Father.

Persecutions and Sufferings

Since its very inception, the Assyrian Church has never been able to
settle in one specific country. Because of persecution and massacres,
its believers were forced to emigrate every hundred years.

The Evangelical and Episcopal Churches in the Middle East

The complexity of the Middle East church history often seems beyond
comprehension to western Christians, and has often been beyond their
patience to understand. The summary given here is simplistic at many
points, but we hope it may serve to give a generally accurate
orientation, and that therefore it will shed some light upon the
enormity of the challenge of inter-church relations facing Christians
in both the Middle East and the West.
The largest Protestant group comprises the Evangelical Reformed
Churches which grew up amongst the Armenians, Copts and Syrians, and
organized themselves in national synods. Most of the Baptist Churches
are linked to the Southern Baptist Convention of the U.S.A. The
Anglicans come under the Episcopal Archdiocese of Jerusalem and the
Middle East. The main Lutheran Church is in Jordan. These churches
have retained neither patriarchal structure nor affiliation.
Today, the Evangelical and Episcopal Churches are a small minority
(some 2.5% of the Christian minority in the Middle East),
characterized more by their diversity than unity, which goes back to
their varying cultural backgrounds and differing concepts of history
of salvation. Their missionary origin has not endowed them with any
significantly corresponding unity. At the very outset, missionaries
did not strive to foster unity and rather tended to value
diversification.

The National Evangelical Union of Lebanon

The National Evangelical Church came into being in 1847, when a small
group of Lebanese Evangelicals decided to found a national Evangelica
Church in Beirut by presenting a petition to this effect to the
missionaries working in Beirut at the time. For quite some time, the
pastors of this church were Arabic-speaking missionaries until 1890,
when Yusul Bard, a Lebanese Presbyterian minister was installed as
the first Lebanese pastor of the Church. In 1870 a church was built
on a compound that was used by both the Lebanese and American
congregations.
The membership of the Church comes to about 6,500 persons, spread in
and around Beirut. In the mid-sixties the National Evangelical Church
of Beirut joined hands with about eight other congregations in the
suburbs and mountains around Beirut and formed the National
Evangelical Union of Lebanon.

The National Evangelical Synod of Syria and Lebanon

Beginning in 1819, a number of missionary representatives came to
various parts of the Middle East. Those who responded to the Bible
message came to be known as `injiliyyeh’, a term based on the Arabic
word for Gospel. The Protestant faith was given official recognition
in Lebanon in 1848. In 1851, a church was organized in Hasbaya on the
slopes of Mt. Hermon, and the following year a church was founded in
Aleppo, Syria. In the next few years churches were established in the
Syrian city of Horns, in South Lebanon at Sidon, and in two Lebanese
mountain villages. In 1870, these churches reported a total of 243
adult communicant members. The present membership is about 10,00The
Coptic

Evangelical Church – Synod of the Nile

The Evangelical Church in Egypt started in 1854. It became
independent from the Presbyterian Church, USA in 1926. The moderator
is elected every year.
Since 1860 the church has been active establishing schools. In 1865
it founded the Assiut American College. The agricultural department
of this college, established in 1928, contributed to the improvement
of dairy farming in the country.

The Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Iran

The Evangelical Presbyterian Church of Iran developed out of the work
of the American Presbyterian and congregational missionaries, the
first of whom came to Iran in 1934. The work was begun among the
Nestorian Assyrian Christians of the Urmia (Rezaieh) district in
north-western Iran. In 1855, several Protestant congregations came
into existence in and around Rezaieh. The first presbytery was
organized in 1862, and other presbyteries later.

The Episcopal Church in Jerusalem and the Middle East
The Episcopal Church in Jerusalem and the Middle East was officially
inaugurated in January 1976. It succeeded the old Jerusalem
archbishopric and was established in accordance with principles set
at the Anglican Consultative Council in Dublin in 1973. It consists
of four dioceses: Jerusalem, Egypt, Iran, Cyprus and the Gulf. The
President is elected by the Synod from among the diocesan bishops.

Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan

Protestant mission work in the Holy Land started in the middle of the
19th century by missionary societies from England and Germany. They
founded congregations and schools in Beit Jala, Bethlehem, Beit
Sahour, Jerusalem. Later, congregations were established in Ramallah
and Amman.

Union of The Armenian Evangelical Churches in the Near East

Beginning in the second decade of the 19th century as an indigenous
reform movement with the Armenian Orthodox Church, it developed into
an independent community in 1846 in Istanbul, and in subsequent
decades registered a membership of 60,000 throughout the Ottoman
Empire. After the First World War, when the Armenian population was
decimated and the remnants deported from its historical homeland in
what is now called Turkey, the Union was reorganized in Syria and the
Lebanon. The Union is composed of 24 autonomous congregations (about
10,000 faithful). It provides also a ministry for a number of
Assyrian Protestant congregations.

Evangelical Church in Sudan

The Evangelical Church in Sudan was founded by missionaries of the
United Presbyterian Church, popularly known `American Mission’. In
1965, the mission decided to transfer responsibility for Evangelical
work in the Sudan to the Sudanese themselves. Thus the Council of the
Evangelical Church in the Sudan was created and took charge of the
management of the schools and institutions belonging to the American
Mission .

Episcopal Church in Sudan

The first successful attempt by Protestants to establish a church in
Khartoum is to be credited to the Anglican Bishop Llewellyn Gwynne.
In 1899, he started to work in Qmdurman. The year 1904 saw the laying
of the foundation stone of the first Anglican Church in Khartoum.
This church was considered as a diocese of the Jerusalem
Archbishopric until 1974, when it reverted to the sole jurisdiction
of the Archbishop of Canterbury as an extra-provincial diocese while
awaiting the setting up of the new province of Sudan.

Presbyterian Church in the Sudan

The Presbyterian Church in the Sudan is the fruit of missionary
activity in Sudan by Presbyterian and Reformed Churches in the USA.
It achieved autonomy in 1956 . This Church is the third largest
church in the country after the Roman Catholic Church and the
Episcopal Church. It maintains close relations with the United
Presbyterian Church of East Africa.

Denominational and non-Denominational
Protestant Churches

The following churches do not take part in the ecumenical movement,
nor are they member churches of the Middle East Council of Churches.

Baptist Churches in the Middle East

These churches have a small but growing membership with a wide
variety of missionary origins. Those related to the Southern Baptist
Convention, USA, are located primarily in Lebanon and Jordan, with
smaller groups in Egypt, Palestine and elsewhere.

Armenian Evangelical Spiritual Brotherhood

The Church was established in Beirut in the early 1920ʼs. It is
related to the Armenian Evangelical Brotherhood Churches in the
world, which have three main branches: South America, North America,
Europe & Middle East.

The Evangelical Assemblies of God

The Evangelical Assemblies of God in Lebanon is related to the
Assemblies of God in the USA. It was granted the right of
establishing churches, schools, orphanages, etc. by a presidential
decree in 1956 in Lebanon.

Seventh Day Adventists – Middle East Division

The church has existed in Beirut since 1904. Adventist congregations
are found in Jordan, Turkey, Cyprus, Iraq and Iran..

The Church of Nazarene

This church has a total of some twenty small congregations and three
schools in Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Palestine.

The Church of Christ

This church began missionary activity in Lebanon in 1961 and now has
three organized congregations along with a Bible training school in
Beirut

The Church in the Gulf

Today many churches in the Middle East have congregations or dioceses
in the Gulf. The Orthodox Church of Antioch has the diocese of
Baghdad and the Gulf. The Armenian Church has the Prelature of Kuwait
and the Gulf, the Coptic Orthodox Church has a diocese based in
Kuwait.
The Anglican Church has developed from a variety of sources. The
British Forces were served by chaplains who also encourage the
formation of congregations for other expatriates. The Gull
Archdeaconry was formed in 1970 and this led to the establishment of
the Anglican Diocese in Cyprus and the Gulf in 1976.
The Roman Catholic Churches in the Gulf came mainly from India and
East Africa. Capuchin Fathers, centered on Aden, began church
buildings alter the end of World War II in Bahrain and elsewhere. In
Kuwait there is a Roman Catholic church and a cathedral. Today there
is another cathedral at Abu Dhabi, the center of the Diocese of
Arabia.
In the last few years the Syrian Orthodox Church, the Mar Thoma
Church of India, the Church of South India and the Urdu-speaking
Church of Pakistan have established parishes or congregations in
several centers, usually sharing Evangelical or Anglican church
facilities.

Co-Existence and Peace

The sad example of the division which religion can stir up is
exemplified by the term `Holy Land’. The phrase today conjures up
several contrasting views. Some read it and picture soft brown hills,
dotted here and there with ancient olive groves and slowly shifting
herds of sheep. Others feel a stirring within as they imagine the
ancient prophets who appeared in that region to change the destinies
of so many. Then too, there are those who follow the footsteps of
Jesus Christ in and around Galilee, Jerusalem, Capernaum, etc. Then
there are those who cannot help but shake their heads at the irony in
the phrase as they consider the war and destruction that strained the
history of that `Holy Land’.

Although there is cause and Justification for despair, the three
great Monotheistic religions which developed successively there –
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam – share much more than is generally
known or suspected. That sprang from the same basic geographical area
and, thus, are all semitically rooted. And due largely to their
common ancestor, Abraham, the teachings of each were originally
written and spoken in closely related languages (Hebrew, Aramaic, and
Arabic).

Many of the teachings are similar and several of the same incidences
and characters are mentioned in the scriptural writings of all three
religions. The Jewish Torah is included in the Christian Bible, and
both, Jews and Christians are respected by Muslims as ` People of the
Book’.

With so many common strands, it is not surprising, then, that
historically Jews, Christians and Muslims have often lived side by
side in the same communities in the Middle East.

Perhaps this point is the key to peace for the conflicts, not
conflicts of religious beliefs; they pertain, rather, to questions of
economy, politics and rights of self-determination and, to a large
extent, have been exacerbated by influence and powers outside the
area.

Perhaps the greatest hope for salvation is that because religion is
never far removed from society in that part of the world, it will
also help to bridge the differences and heal the wounds and build the
foundation of true peace and unity.

;lang=US

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.hellenicnews.com/readnews.html?newsid=2354&amp