Tehran: Iran to host world gymnastic events

Persian Journal, Iran
Dec 31 2004

Iran to host world gymnastic events
Dec 31, 2004, 11:15

Iranian capital city of Tehran will host 2005 world gymnastic
championship events, Iran’s Gymnastic Federation secretary said. He
estimated that between 30 to 50 countries will attend the world
competition.

Tehran has earmarked eight billion rials for the events, Nawab said.
Industrial and trade firms have given a thumb up to sponsor the
games, he said.

Four top Armenian coaches will head to Tehran in ten days to prepare
the Iranian national team before the events.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia’s Agarak Copper and Molybdenum Combine Steps Up Output

RIA OREANDA
Economic News
December 31, 2004 Friday

Armenia’s Agarak Copper and Molybdenum Combine Steps Up Output

Agarak. OREANDA/RUSMET.RU Beginning with January 1, 2005, Armenias
Agarak Copper and Molybdenum Combine will begin increasing its ore
production volumes to 3 million tons per year, enough to produce
700,000 tons of molybdenum concentrate and 6,000 tons of copper
concentrate.

The American company Comsup Industries Ltd, which owns a 100% stake
in the combine, has already invested $3 million in the combine under
its agreement with the Armenian government. It has yet to invest
$500,000 in the modernization project. According to combine director
Mais Khachatrian, all of this money has been directed to reequip the
production facilities.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

How the Religious Exploiters Exploit

The Progress Report
Dec 30 2004

How the Religious Exploiters Exploit

Guest Essay – “MORAL VICTORY- Religious Exploitation, and the New
American Creed”

Have you recently read, or re-read, Sinclair Lewis’ famous novel
“Elmer Gantry”? It explains a lot of what’s happening in the U.S.
today. And so does this article.

“Our moral perils are not those of conscious malice or the explicit
lust for power. They are the perils which can be understood only if
we realize the ironic tendency of virtues to turn into vices when too
complacently relied upon; and of power to become vexatious if the
wisdom which directs it is trusted too confidently.”
— Reinhold Niebuhr

by Dom Stasi
IN THE BEGINNING…
I remember it as though it were yesterday. I was a young engineer
fresh from a successful and heady seven years in the manned lunar
expedition program called Project Apollo.

Along with thousands of other American engineers, scientists, pilots,
and technicians, people accustomed to working in relative obscurity,
we had found ourselves suddenly at the center of the universe. And
though Albert Einstein had already proven that everything and
anything can rightfully be considered the center of the universe, I’m
speaking less prosaically. For a young man in the morning of his
career, or an old man at its dusk, and today I can speak with
knowledge of both circumstances, Project Apollo was that something we
would remember the rest of our days. Physics aside, Apollo simply was
for a time the center of the universe of men. Anyone who had the
great good fortune and talent to be a part of it, would be changed
for the experience, and changed for the better. Such harmless vanity
is simply human nature. We are all of us creatures who delight in
success however small might be our part in its achievement. Self
esteem is critical to our well being as humans. On Apollo it made us
all work harder and with more passion than any work I’ve known since.
Contributing to Project Apollo, and earning the trust and respect of
project engineers older and wiser than I, and ultimately that of the
astronauts themselves, gave this and so many other young Americans a
special kind of self-confidence. Few have had such an opportunity so
early in their lives and careers. Fewer still might have accepted it,
for failure would have haunted all our days, and with each new
moonrise, our nights as well. It’s been said that experience doesn’t
change a person, but make him more of what he already is. Perhaps
that is so. Think of the challenges you have faced in your own life.
Think of how your responses to them tempered or softened you,
contributed to, or somehow affected your social, intellectual, and
perhaps, spiritual growth and attitudes. Reflecting upon ones life
can be a rewarding or a painful exercise. Yet it is a thing from
which we cannot hide. As Socrates observed, `An unexamined life is
not worth living.’ Extreme? Perhaps. But keep these concepts of self
top of mind. Remain mindful of self-confidence, self-esteem, and, not
incidentally, self-worth as you read on.

Of course, even the best of good things must come to an end. So it
was with Apollo. But at its close, when few outside the program
really cared about silly-appearing moonwalks anymore, I was one of a
relatively small group of Earthlings who had learned the empirical
science of orbital mechanics and knew about sending moving pictures
home from space. In our seven years of transmitting and receiving
them, all of America had seen those pictures. All of the world would
see those pictures evolve over time from grainy, hardly discernable
monochromatic images to full color, full motion, high resolution
renditions worthy of National Geographic. Yet, in the mid-Seventies,
and the end of manned missions to other worlds, those of us still
with the civilian sector of the US Space Program were developing more
pragmatic concerns about its future and our own. We’d all be looking
for work soon. As for me and my own future, the ability to send
moving pictures back from space seemed an esoteric skill at best, a
skill wholly devoid of commercial value and now, with no new worlds
on the trip sheet, it was becoming boring as well. I grew restless.

As things turned out, I was one of the lucky ones. I could stay on at
the aerospace plant where we’d built the Lunar Lander. But with the
program essentially over, I would have to transfer back to jets, back
to reconnaissance flight test where I’d started out, but in 1975, I
and just about every other American had had his fill of warplanes.
Also, I came to realize that I’d lost my young man’s taste for
dangerous work. I was a husband and father now, and that was a
convenient excuse to rationalize my growing yellow streak. I needed a
change. I needed another kind of job, and we were in another stupid
recession that the equally stupid TV economists never saw coming, yet
dished out advice about to the credulous masses. Some things never
change. Some jobs don’t need a skill or a record of success to
prevail. Unlike the unforgiving field of flight test, TV seemed full
of such performance-free jobs. But I was an engineer, not a TV
economist. I’d learned about video technology flying Air Force
reconnaissance in the Arctic, transferred it to a civilian career. It
was the technology that revealed the Russian missiles in Cuba, and
kept tabs on the Russian bombers poised like coils to spring from
Siberia if things in Cuba went awry. It was that same video
technology in civilian dress that had allowed us to see the moon
walks. But in its private-sector application, the application known
as commercial broadcast television, video was used shamefully.
Commercial television it seemed, was a medium created by our
collective genius only to have it exploit our collective stupidity…at
least stupidity enough to buy the junk they were continuously
peddling from its screens. A career in broadcast television
engineering held little allure.

I was offered a job with the State Department’s Voice Of America
propaganda arm, went through all the loyalty and security checks only
to turn it down – twice. I tried teaching college for a time, but
found myself too young and selfish to be satisfied by teaching others
what I still wanted to be doing myself. But where? Who in the world
needed a guy whose skill was sending movies back from space?

The answer came in a completely unexpected phone call.

Home Box Office was something I’d never heard of before that call
came in out of the blue. Home Box Office. HBO? What’s that? I asked
the eager-sounding `head hunter’ on the other end of the phone.

Next thing I knew I was sitting in a mahogany clad room high in the
Time-Life Building on Rockefeller Center in New York City. This was
no airplane factory. Elegant perfect women glided by, sylphlike and
intimidating. All the men were dressed in white shirt and tie. I was
too, of course. Yet, hidden beneath my jacket, was the only
short-sleeved white shirt in the room. How impractical of them,
thought I. It’s high summer. Why wear long sleeves only to roll them
up? Don’t these guys get it? I’d found another world, it seemed,
right here on Earth.

Otherworldly or not, TV and motion pictures was the world in which I
would spend the next 30 years of my engineering career. But first I
had to get through this interview, or meeting or whatever it was.
Eventually, I was led to a private corner office where I was
introduced to yet another of the a long-sleeved executives. His
sleeves were not rolled, but terminated in silver cuff links:
obviously a big shot. To my amazement the guy wanted to send movies –
real Hollywood movies – back from space. Looking beyond his obvious
lack of industrial fashion sense, I told him he was nuts. Then I told
him why he was nuts. He dismissed my unqualified psychoanalytic
opinions, but listened intently to my technical ones. To my surprise,
he offered me a job. To my further surprise, I took it. So much for
lofty ideals and even loftier opinions. I was in the stupid
television business, and in it to stay.

Six months later, our antenna hoisted 22,300 miles above the Earth by
a converted Atlas Delta missile, HBO, was sending movies back from
space. It was an idea that caught on quickly in the private sector.
With a single satellite in space, TV signals – in the case of HBO,
movies – could be received at every single inch of the United States
mainland. There would be no 1500 foot towers (which as a pilot I’d
always hated), no million watt transmitters, and no 100 mile contour
limits of the sort that barricade traditional `terrestrial’ broadcast
signals. Nothing of the sort would impede our little 5 watt
transmitter in the sky. Borne upon a satellite channel whose power
was equal to but that of a night-light bulb, one signal from space
could blanket the entire continental US and most of populous Canada.
It was pure brilliance on the part of those long-sleeved executives –
practical physics and military technology now put to private and
peaceful use. No mind-numbing commercials, and no numb-minded censors
either. I liked it here. This wasn’t stupid. This was cool. This was
way cool. Funny, isn’t it, how we’re able to abandon even strongly
held opinions when our self interest is better served by forming new
ones?

Firmly ensconced in HBO’s fledgling engineering department, and with
our early successes a matter of technical record, I suddenly found
myself being invited to speak at seminars on how to do this TV from
space thing. Ironically, I was teaching again, albeit in a different
venue. Over the next couple of years I would visit all 50 states. But
it was a tutorial for TV execs in the deep South that would remain an
event apart from all the others. Though I was a speaker, I was still
new to the entertainment business, so I knew no one in attendance.
But my talk had gone well, the college teaching experience was paying
off, so there would be no problem finding eager dinner companions
among so large an audience.

Descending the podium, I had noticed but a single empty chair in the
entire room. Taking it, I found myself at a table of strangely
egalitarian folk. They were gentle in manner. They welcomed me
expansively. They introduced themselves. To my delight, they spoke
less of arcane technology than they did of their fellow man and their
responsibilities toward humanity that such technology could help them
fulfill. I listened, interested, noting that they all had that sort
of deliberate not quite real Dixie accent that I’d learned to
recognize in actors when playing Southern characters before the
camera. But why here? Their names — remarkable in retrospect, but
hardly noteworthy at the time — were Jimmy Swaggart, Paul Crouch,
Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker, Pat Robertson, Robert Tilton, and a guy
named Billy Batts. I was present, I know now, at American
Televangelism’s Big Bang, or if you prefer, its Genesis. Big league
Fundamentalist Christian TV Evangelism was born at that table that
day.

These seemingly gentle folk were fairly voracious in their acceptance
of this new way to spread The Word, nationwide. Worldwide! They were
there to learn of a new way to propagate their version of the Gospel
Of Jesus Christ. They conversed in Biblical quotes, nodding their
heads in profound understanding, `Amen, brother,’ so on. The
experience seems a bit surreal now. It was not. They were there to
buy satellite antennas and anything else they would need to fulfill
their self-proclaimed mission as Christ’s revisionist vicars on
Earth. They each seemed to have a little licensed religious TV
station of their own somewhere in the US, and if they hooked that
signal to the satellite, they would not only be able, but mandated to
have that signal carried by another hot, new medium: cable
television. That mandate would come from a little known federal
communications law known as the Must Carry Rule. It was little known
to you and me, perhaps, but well known to the budding televangelists.
These seemingly innocent people, and the equally innocent seeming
circumstances that brought us together would change the lives of
everyone at that table in the decades to come. And that in turn would
affect the world in a way none of us could have imagined. Because,
and though I had no way of knowing it, America was about to take its
first step on a 30 year journey to the Dark Ages. Today we know it
only as the 21st Century. When looking back upon it, history will
prove less kind.

>From this butterfly effect, would grow e-piety’s perfect storm. It
was the mid-Seventies. Our culture had been reeling from the narcotic
excesses of the Sixties and the sexual intemperance of the Seventies.
The divorce rate was the highest it’s ever been in our nation’s
history. The entire concept of nuclear family was under siege as
never before in America. It seemed as if everything familiar was
changing. And while most Americans were blessed with moderate
appetites, self-disciplined behaviors, and a measure of common sense,
and thus well suited to social change, many others were not. To so
many of our repressed and simplistic countrymen and women every new
experience in this brave new age, however intuitive, however mundane,
seemed an epiphany. So, while most Americans also managed to remain
relatively unaffected by the willingly-acquired excesses that
characterized the period, many others could not. America had also
just emerged from a decade-long war of unspeakable horror, and
dubious purpose. Thanks to a still-relevant news media, a mandatory
draft, and casualty rate topping 200,000 (58,000 KIA) Vietnam
affected all aware Americans. To avoid the draft, countless young
Americans married in haste and conceived unloved children in order to
gain deferment. Millions more enrolled and remained in colleges
though they would not ordinarily have done so but for the student
deferment. (No fewer than 12 deferments were granted to chickenhawks
Dick Cheney (5) and John Ashcroft (7) alone!) Since the college
deferment required actually going to college and studying something,
the experience exposed millions of commonplace minds to the volatile
philosophies of extraordinary – and quite often revolutionary –
thinkers for the first time in their personal, and America’s societal
history. One way or another, every American, regardless of family,
background, intellect, or social circumstance shared in the war’s
trauma and were made to look upon, and confront its distasteful
significance. Drenched in this cascade of social and moral upheaval,
vast numbers of Americans were driven to the edge. Many more went
over that edge and found comfort only in denial or in excess, or
both. Be it drugs, sex, alcohol, violence, or all of the above, there
was a measure of comfort and escape to be found in the sensual
distractions of excess, and it was available and beckoning from
wherever one turned.

Indulgence would yield a temporary comfort, and when the millions who
over-indulged came crashing back to reality, many needed comforting
of another kind. They needed reform, and some degree of certainty in
what seemed an even-more-uncertain society than that which they had
attempted to escape. They needed someone or something to which they
could turn for advice, direction, strength, and inspiration. For
those who survived the fall physically but not emotionally, there
arose a need for some mortal contact, someone who would not consider
them failed humans, someone or something to show them the way back.
Or, more simply stated, millions and millions and millions of
Americans needed a new addiction to wean them from and obviate the
mental scars left by their old addictions of war and sex and drugs,
and social transgression, and violence, and confusion, and behavior
outside the limits of their operant conditioning. Instead of
assessing and accepting their memories, so very many Americans needed
forgiveness for their actions. Those among the multitudes lacking the
resolve to accept and assess and repair their assaulted psyches,
those lacking the strength to pick themselves back up (and their
numbers were legion) needed something more. They needed an emotional
crutch. What people need, people tend to find. If they don’t find it
by themselves, there are always those willing to provide it… usually
for a price. In this case, it appeared literally right before their
eyes. Salvation, forgiveness, aggrandizement, self-esteem, courage,
moral superiority, all of it was beaming to them right from heaven
itself, and onto their television screens. Satellite delivered
televangelism was born on that day back in 1975. I watched it hatch.
Suddenly it was everywhere. There was never a time in modern history
when it was `needed’ more. From the flickering boxes in America’s
living rooms came the siren call to her desperate multitudes. `Hey
you out there in TV land, whatever you’ve done, and to whomever
you’ve done it, no worries. Put down that bottle, throw away that
needle, stop punching your wife, whatever. All is forgiven… or can
be. In fact, you can instantly become superior to those infidels
who’ve not found the light and The Way and have done so much to
degrade you for so long. Just listen to me, then send cash, check, or
money order to the address on your screen. You’ll be the best there
is, brothers and sisters, the best there is. Trust Jesus. Trust me.
Send a check. Halleluiah!

Given that so very many of `Christian’ fundamentalism’s contemporary
American adherents believe that they have failed in the eyes of those
who follow more moderate religious or societal paths, and given the
widespread genetic proclivity toward belonging, they also needed
something more extreme than rational theology to light their way back
from the abyss. They needed to be a part of something so extreme, so
strident that it would also provide them the psychological
wherewithal to dismiss their moderate fellows’ judgments of them.
That would require a system of beliefs and strictures so rigorous, so
abstemonious that it would also serve to obviate or at least
trivialize the beliefs and behaviors of their moderate
Judeo-Christian counterparts, and those of enlightened liberal
practitioners of any religion and religious thought, thus
discrediting those they saw as their mortal judges and despicable
scholarly elites, their betters. Once again, they needed an escape
from reality. They needed a mind fix.

There is but one major creed that has offered such impenitent
forgiveness, even aggrandizement for simply having rejected ones past
transgressions and accepting its tenets. There is but one creed that
associates itself so closely with an Anglo-Protestant American
heritage, despite that no such identity ever existed. (Nature abhors
a vacuum. The vacuum left by most Americans’ ignorance of their own
country’s relatively brief history, is a vacuum easily filled by
myth. Any student of American history knows well that many of the
Founders were religious, but none publicly fundamentalist Christian.
References to God, not to Jesus, prevail in their writings. The
crafters of our Republic were brilliant men. But few would dispute
that the three greatest geniuses among them were Thomas Jefferson,
Benjamin Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton. Franklin and Jefferson
were professed deists, Hamilton a homosexual. From where does the
religious Right’s claim to their legacy stem? It stems from
imagination. Because it simply never was. Religion was a part of the
beautiful fabric of early America, not its foundation. The plurality
of the US Constitution superceded the singularity of the Mayflower
Compact.) There is but one creed that stimulates intolerance while
proclaiming an inclusiveness based on its very antithesis. And
finally, but most critical, there is but one creed that bases its
fundamentalism on an absolutely literal interpretation of a Bible it
considers absolutely flawless. Yet the Bible passed down through the
ages is largely a fabrication. It is laced with revisionist scripture
and distortions of convenience that the most serious of religious
scholars have found to be at best, only 18% historically factual.1 At
best.

Thus, proximate attribution to the approximate Word is the rough
equivalent of a 21st century airline or ship’s captain using 14th
century maps, and only 14th century maps, by which to navigate and
presuming them to be inviolate.

I’ll take the bus.

By exploiting this widespread proclivity to believe, the Bible has
become a convenient vehicle through which unscrupulous interpreters
can derive a creed, a creed which, if accepted with a zealot’s
fervor, would forgive anything – absolutely anything – one might have
inflicted upon himself or his fellow man, woman, child, beast,
vegetable or mineral in the past, and do so sans active or
substantive non-monetary penance. It is a creed that is conveniently
blind to any dichotomy between intolerance and forgiveness, theocracy
and democracy, benevolence and vengeance, faith and political
corruption. That is the creed that encourages one to be born again,
the Evangelical Creed of Biblical literalism. Or what is alternately
called rightist, conservative, Evangelical, fundamentalist
Christianity. So ill conceived and distorted is this ostensibly
`literal’ acceptance of oft revised, translated and interpreted
scripture, that serious Biblical scholars now consider it fabrication
in the interest of self-servitude and the exploitation of mind-cure.
Noted Biblical scholar and psychologist Edmund D. Cohen postulates
that, `Cast free form its Biblical moorings, Christianity came to
denote anything good or wholesome in American life.’2 Inventing
religions of convenience is characteristic of men, not the province
of man.

Nonetheless, and as usual, legions of credulous, disillusioned,
disconnected Americans fell victim to fundamentalism’s lure. Weather
the adherent fancies a turban, a topknot, or a Stetson, religious
extremism serves a purpose no different from drugs when it becomes a
crutch. Religious extremism has become the simplistic answer for far
too many of our countrymen’s mortal problems. For its `Christian’
adherents, the answers to all life’s problems are found between the
Bible’s covers. There is no need to actually indulge in the human
attribute of reasoning. Intellect is fabricated through rote
memorization of scripture. But were it all that simple.
Unfortunately, as with most other forms of extremism which abdicate
thought to dogmatic obedience, fundamentalism is also the source of
so very, very many more problems than it ever has solved, or ever
will solve.

Recall now, the earlier references to self-esteem, the vacuum it
leaves when it is absent or destroyed through self-destructive
living, excess, compulsive-obsessive behaviors, inflicted or accepted
abuse.

Anyone who would have been addicted to sex, drugs, and anything but
rock and roll, was a candidate for addiction to whatever else suited
his or her self-depreciated fancy. Anyone who needed forgiveness for
the harm he’d done to himself or to others, could find it here.
Christianity – but especially this strange, highly-selective, but
very heady new simplistic form of it – was an addiction about which
they could even feel good. They could even feel better than anyone
else. They could garner immense self-esteem, however ill-placed. That
rush was, and is to this day, a first in so many disturbed lives. In
fact, lets throw in faith-healing of the most desperately ill while
were at it. What’s the harm?

The ensuing decades would see the easily led, easily addicted, easily
persuaded, easily frightened, abused, downtrodden, secret-harboring,
pain ridden – in short, vulnerable – masses drawn to the flickering
images of these fire and brimstone preachers on their cable
televisions and they would be converted by the millions, by the
tens-of-millions. They would belong. All is forgiven. All is well, or
will be shortly. All. Absolutely all. Oh, by the way, don’t forget to
send the check.

If these words seem harsh, I simply make no effort to disguise my
disdain for those who would exploit the vulnerable, nor will I
soft-peddle the obvious abuse by so many, of a system of government
created to, among other things, tolerate and protect religious
freedom. The abuse of that trust by so many televangelists, and the
further misuse of the public electromagnetic spectrum to exploit the
irrational, credulous, impressionable, desperate, and weak who
believe them is an especially vile form of TV indecency. But don’t
look for any scrutiny by our current Federal Communications
Commission. Bush stooge and FCC Commissioner, Michael Powell, will be
too busy looking for bare breasts to keep the citizenry’s pathetic
popular mind from realizing that he’s destroying public interest
protections such as the station ownership cap. That cap remains the
only barrier to the continued expansion by the pious parasites of
televangelism. Powell is bent on destroying that cap in the special
interest of his owners.

FALSE PROPHETS / REAL PROFITS:

Keep in mind that we’re speaking of Christianity, albeit an extreme
form, but Christianity: a belief in the divinity of Jesus as Christ,
as God the Son, and in His teachings and principles upon this mortal
coil.

Keep in mind, too, that we’re speaking of the Old Testament as well,
of the introductory scriptures themselves, the scriptures to which
many Evangelicals adhere dogmatically, the fundament, Genesis
2:16-17, the garden, the forbidden fruit. The Bible virtually begins
with God’s admonitions to man on the virtues of moderation, the
perils of excess. It is the first admonition to Adam… the first! Yet,
somehow, today’s Biblical literalism seems to yield to interpretation
at such uncomfortable junctures as Genesis. The flesh is, after all,
weak. So on, so forth, ad infinitum.

As you read further, please remain mindful that Jesus in his Earthly
manifestation owned virtually nothing. Such modesty must have set a
poor example to TV evangelists. They own a lot of things. Boy, do
they own a lot of things. They want to own a lot more. Michael Powell
will soon allow them to do just that.

Need an example of how lucrative is the televangelist business?
Several examples? Easy.

Most of you know of a religious TV show called the `700 Club.’ It was
founded by presidential candidate, gay basher, and TV evangelist
extraordinaire Pat Robertson. It got its name from Robertson’s
admonition to his initial 700 rural viewers to send him a donation of
$10.00 each. That was the estimated cost of operating his fledgling
`terrestrial’ TV show. Ten years after Pat Robertson made his modest
$7000.00 request, and with his channel now being carried by
satellite, he had 26 million regular viewers across the country.
Operating revenues had grown to a staggering $145,517,000.00 annually
in the US alone.3 Today the `700 Club’ is carried in 66 countries.
Robertson and his Christian Coalition purport enormous influence in
American politics. This lofty pulpit allowed Robertson to predict
that Armageddon would arrive in 1982. This prospect would of course
leave faithful viewers with no practical need for such things as
green bananas, nor incidentally, their retirement savings, but that’s
just speculation by this jaded writer. When, despite Ronald Reagan’s
best efforts, the world failed to end, it didn’t matter much to
Robertson’s flock, no one was complaining or seeking a refund,
instead they were told to thank Jesus. They did. Later, Robertson
actually had his television crews preparing to televise the Second
Coming. That was in 1990. Why would Robertson believe that he and he
alone knew this? Are the TV crews still on location? Where might that
be?

Eventually, his lackluster performance as a prophet led Robertson to
abandon prediction in favor of the safer and more politically potent
practice of hindsight. For example, he has recently proclaimed credit
for George W. Bush’s `re’ election. However dubious a distinction
that might be, Bush believes him, so little else matters. As such we
can expect Robertson’s influence to increase in these four dismal
years ahead as Bush continues distributing our US Treasury’s contents
to his friends, and promotes his `Faith Based Initiative’ program.
Initiative indeed.

Robertson is not alone. Fabulous wealth and power would be visited
upon many of this new breed of high-tech missionaries, and now it
seems they and their fiscally less impressive sycophants are
everywhere one turns. There is no admission prerequisite to the
salvation club, and no barrier to moral superiority. All one need do
is buy it at the two-for-one sale that’s always going on. (Call the
number on your screen). State it aloud with some reference to Jesus,
wave your hand in the air, and back the rapt gestures with cash,
check, or money order, and you’re on the Heavenly Express. But don’t
forget that check. God don’t save no deadbeats. The tax-free American
dollar is still worth plenty in heaven.

Another dinner companion that fateful night was Paul Crouch. Like
Robertson and Jesus, Crouch, the televangelist, and story telling
founder of Trinity Broadcast Network (TBN), started out with
virtually nothing. Using a rented studio in southern California and a
set made from his living room furniture and shower curtain, Crouch
went on the air from Burbank. He claims that later, in 1975 to be
exact, he was visited by God one night. God projected a map of the
United States on Paul’s ceiling, and told him about satellite
technology. God went on to tell Paul Crouch how the satellite (No,
not the moon. God forgot to put batteries in that satellite. We’re
talking modern here.) would allow him to broadcast to all those
cities all across America.

Thanks to God’s little slide show on Paul Crouch’s ceiling, Paul
would have no further need of his living room sofa and shower curtain
as a set. In fact, today he sits upon a golden throne in a
velvet-curtained studio, all of it generously funded by the
$126,000,000.00 in annual donations from his faithful viewers in
satellite television land.4 I often wonder why Paul Crouch came to
that seminar at all. Why listen to dopes like me babble on when God
Himself had already told Paul about satellite television? Funny how
Crouch never mentioned his nocturnal visit from God. It would have
been great dinner conversation. Because, except for that smelly guy I
always see at the corner of Hollywood and Vine, I’ve never met anyone
who’s been visited by God.

Yet another of these people is Robert Tilton. Tilton was flying high
with his TV ministries beaming forth from Texas or Oklahoma to
America’s living rooms, thus pulling in $800,000.00 per month in
donations. But an industrious dumpster-diving reporter would find
thousands of prayer requests intended for the preacher’s attention,
in that dumpster unopened and unread except to extract the checks and
cash enclosed. The story got to ABC-TV and put a temporary crimp in
Reverend Tilton’s style. He’s back on the air again though, and doing
just fine.8 Today’s media takes no notice.

There were more. Everyone remembers Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker. We all
of us endured their spectacular public implosion, so I won’t drag it
out here. But they, of course, had a TV ministry too. They called it
Praise The Lord. Its letters, like those of TBN, were PTL. Remember
PTL? It was not long, however, before their intemperately flamboyant
lifestyle had the FBI wondering whether PTL stood for Praise The
Lord, or Pass The Loot. They found out. When Bakker went to jail,
Jerry Falwell took over the ministry. Falwell would shortly be
accused of swindling his new flock out of $73 million in a bond
scheme.5 Falwell also claims credit for Bush `re’ election. Only
history will decide which was the more heinous offense.

Of the seven people at that fateful dinner table, most would be
embroiled in scandals. They would stand accused or proven guilty of
behavior violating their very admonitions and those of their
professed god. One would be indicted for fraud, another convicted,
two would be involved in extramarital affairs with prostitutes and
another accused of sexual harassment by a same-sex employee.6 The
preacher accused of this laying on of hands would pay that employee
nearly half-a-million dollars to keep his silence. Another would
enter drug rehab. One I would personally witness attempting to pass a
worthless check for $2,000,000.00 of satellite equipment and
services. Nice bunch.

Yet they prevail. One multi-millionaire not mentioned previously, is
Armenian-born preacher, Benny Hinn. Clad in a strange,
cassock-emulating Nehru suite, Hinn is a player’s player.

An Elmer Gantry style faith healer, to this day Hinn has been unable
to show concrete admissible physical evidence of having healed anyone
of anything at any time, anywhere. No problem. (Though he has not yet
been able to re-attach the slugger’s ear, Hinn does accept credit for
curing Evander Holyfield’s heart problems. While most overly-muscular
athletes simply stop taking steroids to accomplish this, Holyfield
credits Benny Hinn with his miraculous recovery.) But to the point,
Hinn takes a salary of $500,00.00 per year for his medical miracle
work. That’s actually modest by many standards. But there’s no mal
practice premium, and it’s taxable. His ministry, however, takes in
$80,000,000.00 a year in donations. He says the donations go back
into the ministry, but Hinn refuses to join the Evangelical Council
for Financial Accountability. (Ministers such as Billy Graham are
members in good standing, but membership requires revealing ones
finances.) Hinn does not make any apologies. `I don’t need gold in
Heaven,’ Hinn says, `I got to have it now.’ Benny Hinn owns several
homes, including his multimillion dollar residence in Dana Point,
California. He travels in a $7 million Gulfstream jet between
$2000.00 a night hotel rooms. He rarely quotes from Genesis 2:16-17.
He’s apparently getting it now.7

In fact, nearly all of them are. These TV preachers prevail and
flourish regardless of their obvious transgressions against their
own, and their gods’ admonitions. And why wouldn’t they? All they
have to do is go back on the air, shed a few tears, promise to be
good, proclaim their love of Jesus, and everyone believes them,
starts crying, hugging one another and writing checks again. Like the
battered wife who believes the `never again’ lies and keeps going
back for more, America is a society ever-more driven by faith and the
dependencies which rationalize it. We’re constantly told what a good
thing faith is. Yet Webster’s defines faith as a belief in something
for which there is neither evidence nor proof. What makes that a good
thing? Imagine if the Justice Department operated on such a premise.
They could jail whomever they wanted to jail, for whatever reason
they chose, with neither evidence or proof of wrongdoing…oh,
they’ve already started doing that? Sorry. My mistake.

We are the most religious advanced society on earth today.9 A recent
poll showed that 59% of Americans consider God and religion very
important in their everyday lives. Compare this to Italy’s 23%, or to
Japan’s and France’s 12% and you start to get the picture.
Surprising, isn’t it? It doesn’t change much between the oceans
either. While we might fondly consider ourselves socially and
economically more similar to our progressive northern neighbors than
we do those to our south, the similarities begin and end with
language. Mexicans answered the same question with 57% of them saying
that religion plays a very important part in their lives. That
compares tightly with the 59% of Americans, while only 30% of
Canadians considered this to be so. Thus, with the most moneyed
country in the world publicly proclaiming its citizens’ faith – or
more simply stated, their eagerness to believe things without
supporting evidence – it’s no wonder the preachers of prey find their
way to our shores, while their bank accounts remain off-shore. It’s
no wonder they have become ever wealthier in material things, ever
more revered by their faith-filled-flocks. They prevail and have been
joined by many others, with doubtless many more yet to come. In
Isaiah 1:18, the Bible tells us – and them – exactly why: `Though
your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow.’

Despite their record of apparent hypocrisy, scandal, and evident
deceit, the televangelists prevail, and have become ever more
powerful a political force in a no-longer secular US government. The
empire of influence – real or perceived – has been built by the TV
preachers on the faith, fortunes, and fealty of the credulous,
desperate, terrified. That it has been founded upon and in violation
of the American Creed is of no concern to them or their
history-oblivious flocks. Now, it is welcomed and even nurtured by
one of the most irrationally faithful among them. In their poster boy
of the moment the fundamentalists have found a man who believes the
world is doomed to destruction in our lifetime, so take what you can
get, and throw the wrapper in the river. And what’s worse, with his
return to power, the idiot-king seems bent on fulfilling that false
prophecy of doom himself if only to prove it correct. I am speaking
of course of extremism’s repentant, born again Christian
fundamentalist and reformed party animal, deserter, tooter, boozer,
stock manipulator, and president, George W. Bush.10, 11, 12, 13

It’s important to know that Bush recently said, `If you want to
understand me, you got to go to Midland Texas.’ I did. What I learned
there is this. George W. Bush bottomed out in Midland, Texas in the
mid-Eighties. But in doing so, he was by no means alone. Midland,
Texas in the Eighties was filled with failed oil men. Not even the
competent ones could make a go of it then. The town was wracked by
suicides and drunkenness as a result of its one and only industry
going bust. When one does not have work in Midland, there are few
alternatives to idleness. One alternative is drink. The other is
Church. Among troubled men the alternatives often proceed one to the
other, and in that order. When George W. Bush, despite his background
of incalculable privilege, found himself just another drunken and
failed oil man in Midland, he had run his string full out. Cocaine
had failed him, business had failed him, drink had failed him. He had
called himself the Bush family’s black sheep. Small wonder. Despite
being the fortunate son of the incumbent Vice President of the United
States, the fortunate heir to a fortune his grandfather Prescott Bush
had amassed as a banker to such luminaries as Adolph Hitler, despite
massive investment from the bin Laden family in his Arbusto oil
business, George could not make a go of it.14, 15 He couldn’t find
oil in Texas. There was little left for the hapless drunk but God.
Midland might have run out of customers, and George might have run
out of other people’s money, but God was everywhere here, still is
despite the town’s economic upturn.

Skip Hedgepeth, a contemporary in the Midland Men’s Community Bible
Study group explains Bush’s epiphany thus, `Hard times have a way of
making people draw closer to God. When we’re faced with troubles, we
realize we’re not in charge of everything. So we start looking for a
power greater than ourselves to help us in our troubles.’

While most of us realize we’re not in charge of everything at about 3
months of age, it takes others a bit longer. For them, there’s God.
So, in the Fall of 1985, his cocaine and alcohol abuse no longer a
viable escape, his Arbusto Energy company now just plain busto,
George W. Bush joined the Midland Men’s Community Bible Study Group.
Here he would be introduced to daily Bible readings and the emotional
security found through hugging other men, crying, and dogma. To the
surprise of few who knew him, George’s addictive personality was
about to take control of his ever-smaller brain yet again.16

In Evangelical Christianity, George W. Bush found a culture
supporting non-judgment and unearned forgiveness of ones past deeds.
This is known as Motivated Belief. Further, Evangelicals quite
deliberately separate themselves from moderate Protestants by their
belief in the Bible’s absolute unerring accuracy as the written word
of God. Unless God has continually edited it vicariously, that stands
in stark contrast to logical and rational religious belief and
learning. It stands in equal contrast to Anglo-American concepts of
jurisprudence. It profanes science. But it thrives because it serves
a purpose, and that purpose is self-delusion. It has no place in
enlightened government or philosophy, yet today it dominates
America’s. It is the primary reason Bush won or stole this election
despite his abysmal performance as president these last four years,
and it is the primary reason that he, just like the tainted
televangelists who sent their legions of faithful lemmings out to
vote for their born-again miscreant, can get away with just about
anything in the conditioned minds of his and their followers.

The point of all this is simple. After all, if these American `value
voters’ cannot find it within themselves to ignore the mountains of
evidence and FORGIVE their very leaders of dastardly deeds, and do so
unconditionally, how can they expect to be forgiven themselves? Yet
there is a sinful dichotomy at play here. They will forgive one
another, but condone the vengeance-killing of 100,000 Iraqis without
evidence that any of these slaughtered men, women, or children were
guilty of anything – anything other than being different, that is. To
me, such inconsistent beliefs as forgiveness and vengeance,
sanctifying life while taking it indiscriminately, do not pave the
way to Heaven. Such beliefs are the road to Hell. Unfortunately we’re
all on it together and the kooks are driving.

To Bush and his ilk, life, despite its being a gift from God, is
trivialized as nothing more than a dress rehearsal for the afterlife.
Here you make your mistakes, and here you correct them in order to
achieve salvation. The misused concept is emphasized in the New
Testament, and called upon often by preachers, `…he that shall endure
unto the end, the same shall be saved.’ In the Evangelical
interpretation, it’s not where you start, it’s where you finish after
you’ve finished. This removes the fear of `salvation doubt’ if
believed with vigor and absolution. To the literalists, the Bible
teaches that everyone should be judged only after they’ve died.
Consider how sainthood is ascribed but posthumously. Only thus are
mortals afforded full opportunity to repent and be saved. However,
inconsistent in this interpretation is how the Religous Right’s
dogmatic adherents, such as George W. Bush, deny other potential or
wayward Christians this chance by their vindictive actions. Bush sent
147 convicts to the death chamber in five years as governor. That’s a
record. Nearly all called themselves Christians. Were they given the
opportunity to `endure unto the end,’ and achieve repentance by their
actions, or was Bush better suited to determine their temporal end
than was God? While the wholesale execution of prisoners is an
extreme example, to Bush’s mind, it seems once you’re born, you’re
kill fodder for a greater good independent of your past deeds. He
spent as little as four minutes deciding who lives and who dies. In
this context then, once again, consider the bloodbath that is Iraq.
When and where did Jesus Christ teach this stuff to anybody? Simple.
He did not. Mortal men of purpose made it up. Mortal men find purpose
by acting on those beliefs.

Sigmund Freud writing in his 1927 postulation, The Future Of An
Illusion, says of conservative Christians, `Their acceptance of a
universal neurosis spares them the task of constructing a personal
one.’ Can there be a better explanation of why fear is so liberally
used in our theocratic government’s message today? Can there be any
doubt as to whom they are speaking?

As Americans, as members of what was so recently called the most
advanced society in human history, should we not be looking forward?
Why then do we reward those who always look backward for guidance,
backward to a time and place and a circumstance that never existed
but in their fantasies and the imagination of those who foist such
false ideas about America’s religious heritage upon them? The
Evangelists’ version of That Old Time Religion is, in reality, a very
new concept. But unless we’re about to start burning witches again,
and offering our daughters into slavery, it’s just another bill of
goods they’ve sold themselves…sold being the operative word.

As a culture, we will be made to understand the perils of blind faith
and of retrospection without reference, perils we’ve already loosed
on a more rational world. It has never been stated more succinctly
than wherein Proverbs 29:18 observes how, `Without vision the people
perish.’ Yet by its very definition, blind faith is without vision.
Could there be a more profound misinterpretation of scripture than
that manifest by this administration and the fundamentalist
sycophants who’ve not only rewarded its crimes, but assured their
continuance? They ask us to have faith while they take the lives of
our young in exchange for oil. They ask us to have faith because if
we were intelligent or courageous enough to demand evidence we would
ask them why they’ve embarked upon an illegal war with no plan for
termination; a daily slaughter of Iraqi innocents within their own
homes, a slaughter devoid of honest objectives or reasonable
justification; a daily desecration of the most holy of places without
concern for mortal suffering or divine retribution; a national
security plan that breaks the bank while obviating national security;
a financial deficit with no plan for recovery; a Social Security
privatization plan with no vehicle for funding it other than robbing
an entire generation of retirees and borrowing $2-trillion from
foreign nations; a headlong rush to deny the weak among us aid and
comfort in violation of Christ’s teachings; a national economic model
equal to that of the second worst economy in the hemisphere,
Argentina; a policy of spend and borrow that will leave our children
bankrupt and beholden to the children of other nations; an energy
policy leading to fatal global climate change with no plan for
counteraction or survival of the human race; a collapse of the U.S.
Dollar on world markets with no plan for recovery; a spiraling
national debt with no ability to repay so much as its interest
without selling our country to the Chinese at wholesale; and finally,
the deliberate and pointless alienation of the 6.4 billion people who
did not vote for George W. Bush but whose lives will be affected by
his actions and to whom we will owe trillions of the US dollars our
children must repay.

Summary

Satellite television today allows the majority of those billions and
billions of foreigners to see America and her government’s actions in
her people’s name. This has never before been so. We’ve always known
that power corrupts. But corrupt leaders have been able to shield
themselves from the world’s view in past generations. They’ve often
been able to do so long enough to amass great wealth and power at the
expense of their peoples before running off. But they cannot do so
any longer, not with impunity. America’s actions affect the whole
world. Today, the entire world is watching us. They’re nervous. Their
multitudes will not allow their `values’ to cloud the truth unfolding
before their very eyes on the planet they are willed by God to share
with us, the `superpower.’ For the moment, we’ve abdicated our nation
to delusional screwballs. Many nations have done this before. They
already `get it.’ We don’t The world will not follow our lead. They
will bankrupt us this time. This time they can.

Conclusion

We’ve examined but a few of the shortsighted, self-serving and
visionless prospects for our America under its current irrational,
faith driven `leader.’ On Saturday he told us that `God is guiding
our nation.’ So I guess Bush has delegated even that task to faith.

Call it charm, lunacy, ignorance, stupidity, or just call it what it
is, policy, Bush’s attributes work wonders with many Americans. As
one wag put it, `I like Bush ’cause he’s as dumb as me.’

Bush’s style appeals to what the TV ministers call their `Value
Voters.’ So, let the exit polls be damned, the Evangelicals carried
the day for their poster boy. If they didn’t, they at least gave the
Republican crooks who own this president a plausible vehicle to which
they might attribute the otherwise inexplicable vote counts in this
year’s national election. They have changed our country into
something its founders never intended it to be, a virtual theocracy,
and they did it through abuse of the very system first designed to
prevent it.

Though 30 years ago they had no substantive national influence,
today, by their own literally incredible estimate, born-again
Evangelicals represent 38% of voting age Americans. This year they
appeared in record numbers casting, according to Barna Research, an
estimated 53% of the total vote. That’s a majority however you cut
it. Their votes went overwhelmingly to George W. Bush and his
anti-gay, anti-science, anti-pluralist, anti-social, anti-secular,
anti-Earth, backward-looking, blind faith agenda.

Evangelicals have been convinced that they were the spoiler in this
election. They equate Bush’s victory with their infantile ideas about
morality. They think they exhibited free will, imposed it upon the
Liberal infidels by sending the Bush numbers over the top. In reality
all they did was fall for the Republican line the same way they fall
for their TV preachers’ baloney. They responded as a herd. As always,
it’ll cost them. That’s expected, and it’s old news. What’s really
troubling is this. The TV preachers have shown the manipulators in
the Bush administration how easy it was to use the credulous masses,
to direct them to ends that most would consider outrageously stupid
at the very least. The faithful herd will now be led to the
slaughter, double crossed, deserted, and robbed of something they
consider valuable, as have so many others the Bush administration has
used and discarded during these four graceless years. Perhaps they
deserve it. Perhaps we all do. For, after all, haven’t the rest of
us, those who so fondly consider ourselves enlightened, behaved no
better? Have we not silently and passively ignored the empirical
evidence of exit polls? 17, 18 It was these very exit polls which
caused my source to hear one White House official exclaim, `We’re
being creamed,’ before it miraculously changed in their favor.19 Have
we not ignored the mathematical improbability that nearly every error
uncovered accrued to Bush’s advantage? The laws of probability demand
that multiple random errors trend toward even distribution, but only
if they are truly errors. Are we questioning the electronic `news’
media’s absence from this story? Nope. So, having seen all this
before, are we not therefore, accepting the nearly impossible results
of this election on blind faith?

Blind faith is not a plan for any society’s future survival; neither
is it cognition worthy of the fully developed human mind. Blind faith
is just a pretty mask that hides the ugly face of ignorance. Today,
America wears that mask, and it does not represent the moral or
ethical or religious `values’ of its most rational citizens. Neither
is it fooling anyone but other Americans.

It is said that of all God’s creatures, only humans can deliberately
consider any but their immediate future. Humans and humans alone have
the power of mind to appreciate the implications of their present
actions upon their long-term future and the welfare and survival of
their children. Despite these unique gifts of mind, we are told and
apparently believe that 59,054,087 Americans voted to continue a
dismally failed presidency. Despite that presumably cognitive
understanding, despite that ability to anticipate disaster, another
estimated 80,000,000 voting age Americans chose to stay home on
Election Day altogether. They chose not to vote. One can only ponder
upon what kept them away from the polls, and what might be the values
they consider important, but not important enough to get them get out
of their easy chairs in the interest of saving their lives. There is
but one conclusion to be drawn from these disparate behaviors.
America has suffered a crisis of intellect. We are become a people no
longer adequate to the rigors of sustaining an ethical and equitable
democracy.

As Thomas Paine said at America’s birth, `A people gets the
government it deserves.’

Oh, well. God save America! Her citizens, it seems, are all watching
television.

——————————-

Dom Stasi is Chief Technology Officer for an international media
network. A pilot, Air Force veteran, and member of both the Planetary
Society, and Center For Inquiry, he is a widely published science and
technology writer. A father of two, Mr. Stasi lives in Los Angeles
with his wife of 38 years.

Footnotes

Please have no faith in anything you’ve read here. Unless and until
you check the facts for yourself, that’s all they are, some
stranger’s written words. The following references are provided to
start you on that road – or as an aid to sleep, whichever you prefer.
(DS)

1/
2/ The Mind Of The Bible Believer; by Edmund Cohen, Prometheus Books,
2003
3/
4/
5/
6/
7/
8/
9/ An Anatomy Of American Nationalism, by Anatol Lieven; Oxford
University Press, 2004.
10/
11/
12/
13/ 37.htm
14/
h___Bin_Laden_-_George_W__B/bush___bin_laden_-_geo rge_w__b.html

15/ ler.htm
16/ s/view/
17/
duboard.php?az=view_all&address3x79760

18/
19/

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.progress.org/2004/stasi04.htm
http://religion.rutgers.edu/jseminar/
http://www.davidicke.net/religiousfrauds/associations/cbn.html
http://www.rickross.com/reference/tbn/tbn21.html
http://home.att.net/~vlaszlo/jerry_falwell_1.htm
http://www.rickross.com/reference/tbn/tbn19.html
http://cnt10.tripod.com/hinn.htm
http://www.peopleunitedforreligiousfreedom.org/second_coming.htm
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article6555.htm
http://www.progress.org/archive/drc12.htm
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/bushdui1.html
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article58
http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_07_01/Bus
http://www.rense.com/general40/bushfamilyfundedhit
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jesu
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041203/nyf044_1.html
http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/120604Madsen/120604madsen.html

Soprano subdues, awes Beaver Creek audience

Vail Daily News, CO
Dec 30 2004

Soprano subdues, awes Beaver Creek audience

Isabel Bayrakdarian and her vocal intrument delivered a theater full
of resonating soprano Tuesday evening at the Vilar Center.
Special to the Daily

Shauna Farnell

BEAVER CREEK – The immediate surprise emanated from the entire
audience the minute Isabel Bayrakdarian took the stage.

Wow. She’s thin. She’s beautiful. She’s not really what I expected
… for an opera singer.

Don’t ask me why some of us have this image emblazoned in our mental
trivia that, when we think “soprano,” we think 300-pound, 60-year-old
woman with false eyelashes. Or, maybe it’s just me.

Surely that comment will elicit a slew of affronted feedback from
half the local and online opera community. I hope not.

Before Bayrakdarian’s performance Tuesday evening at the Vilar Center
in Beaver Creek, I already knew that she didn’t fit this prototype.

And maybe the surprise I sensed from the audience isn’t accurately
rendered by my explanation. Maybe everyone was gasping and twittering
because they too already knew that Bayrakdarian was young and
beautiful, they just hadn’t expected her to be this beautiful. I can
only speculate.

The first thing I noticed when I interviewed Bayrakdarian before
Tuesday’s performance was that her speaking voice alone was one of
the loveliest I’d ever heard. Not that I expected one of the world’s
most embraced sopranos to speak in a growl.

The second thing I noticed was that this global icon, born in Lebanon
and having relocated to Canada less than 15 years ago at the age of
15, had no arrogance or ego about her whatsoever. Somehow, she seemed
as excited to talk to me as I was to talk to her. She was articulate,
humble, witty and very friendly.

And when she told me how she’d gone through several minutes of sheer
panic when she thought her luggage containing her gowns was lost in
transit somewhere between the Toronto, Denver and Eagle County
airports, she said, “When you see the show, you’ll understand why I
was so worried.”

I did indeed understand.

She wore two different gowns during the course of Tuesday’s recital,
the first, a Victorian-style burgundy with a lavender shawl that
could have placed her in the center of the Metropolitan Opera (where
she’s already been highly acclaimed), in the middle of a royal
wedding or amidst somebody’s revered collection of valuable porcelain
dolls. The second gown was a black satin V-neck with sheer sleeves
and a half-tattered skirt, perfect for the “Cabaret” numbers which
marked the last segment of her highly diverse, multi-lingual
performance.

The first numbers she sang were by Giacchino Rossini, Italian songs
about a regatta race. She delivered them with such energy – her eyes
going wide and brow furrowing at the dramatic intervals whose
meanings only the Italian speakers of the audience were able to
comprehend. The second segment moved on to Spanish with a series of
numbers by Manuel de Falla.

The section of Armenian hymns, which Bayrakdarian said were
responsible for landing her the part on the “Lord of the Rings: The
Two Towers” soundtrack, were ethereal and resonating. She held each
octave for several seconds without suffering a single heave of her
chest.

The second half of the performance featured a mix of French and
German numbers, the last three of which hit octaves of such quaking
power, they sent a ripple through the audience of uncomfortably
retained applause. The clapping etiquette proved uncertain throughout
the performance. When Bayrakdarian put a hand up to silence it early
on in the recital, the unrequited urge to applaud vigorously after
every piece, if not after every vocal burst in each number, lasted
until the final piece following the encore, where Bayrakdarian donned
castanets and her partner, pianist Serouj Kradjian, who had melted
his fingers into the ivory impeccably on each preceding piece,
stepped up the timing a few notches and both looked pleasantly
drained as they held hands to take their final bow amidst a standing
ovation.

The audience, which numbered less than 500 – possibly one of the most
intimate to which Bayrakdarian’s ever performed since winning the
Metropolitan Opera seven years ago while simultaneously completing
her honors degree in biomedical engineering from the University of
Toronto – hopefully felt as honored as I did to have witnessed such a
rare display. Bayrakdarian said herself that the repertoire was
custom-made for the small audience and this piece of history, exactly
as it elapsed on Tuesday, will never be repeated.

Staff Writer Shauna Farnell can be reached at 949-0555, ext. 610, or
[email protected].

Vail Colorado

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.vaildaily.com/article/20041229/AE/112290012

ANKARA: Captured Russian Militant: Iraqi Kurds Allow PKK Activities

Journal of Turkish Weekly
Dec 30 2004

Captured Russian Militant: Iraqi Kurds Allow PKK Activities in Iraq

Jan Soykok (JTW), 30 December 2004

ANKARA – Anatoliy Kopilov, a PKK militant captured in Iraq in
November 2004, says the two main Kurdish groups in Iraq, KDP and KPP,
allows PKK terror activities in Iraq. AktifHaber, Turkish news portal
reported that Kopilov, a former Russian Army officer, joined the PKK
Organization 5 years ago. Kpilov served to the Russian Army for two
years and joined the organization in Moscow. It is argued that the
Russian Federation supported the PKK terrorism in 1980s and 90s in
order to destabilize Turkey, a strong NATO member.
Kapilov says he lived in the PKK camps for the last 5 years and
became a PKK team leader.
`Communication equipments are provided from Netherlands. The missiles
for the PKK come through Armenia. Communication with the European
bases are being done via internet. There are 3 tones TNT, 2,500
mines, and 2,000 missiles in the PKK bases by Lolan River. The KDP
and the PPK turn a blind eye to PKK activities in Iraq. Even the
KDP’s man Tarik provided military equipments to the PKK-KongraGel.
After the American occupation, the PKK-Kongra Gel captured many
military equipment from the Iraqi Army. The equipment was brought by
trucks to the PKK camps. An American Delegation came to the Hakurk
PKK Camp last April’ added Kapilov.
PKK-Kongra Gel is considered as one of the most dangerous terrorist
organizations by the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and the
European Union and the law of these countries ban any support or
contribution to the PKK-Kongra Gel. The PKK has armed bases in Iraq.
The US forces however have done nothing since the beginning of Iraqi
occupation though President Bush and his officers promised to remove
the terrorist PKK bases in Iraq

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Azeri officials dismiss separatist leader’s remarks on 2004

Azeri officials dismiss separatist leader’s remarks on 2004 results

Ekho, Baku
30 Dec 04

Azerbaijani officials have dismissed the remarks of the Karabakh
separatist leader about the region’s economic progress and military
might in 2004. During his television appearance, the separatist leader
of Nagornyy Karabakh, Arkadiy Gukasyan, praised the region’s economic
performance and military might, promising to increase social spending
in 2005. A spokesman for the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said that
2004 did not bring anything good to Nagornyy Karabakh, while a member
of parliament pointed out that most of Karabakh’s budget depends on
foreign money. In turn, a spokesman for the Azerbaijani Defence
Ministry described Gukasyan’s remarks about the Karabakh army as
“self-delusion”. The following is the text of R. Tofiqoglu’s report by
Azerbaijani newspaper Ekho on 30 December headlined “Arkadiy Gukasyan
is threatening Azerbaijan with a war” and subheaded “He made this
statement during his New Year congratulations to the residents of the
‘NKR’. In Azerbaijan, his remarks are being described as
absurd”. Subheadings have been inserted editorially:

Separatist leader praises results of 2004

Speaking on TV in connection with the end of 2004 on 29 December, “the
president of Nagornyy Karabakh”, Arkadiy Gukasyan, wished “the people
of Artsakh [Nagornyy Karabakh], first of all, peace” in 2005.

“This year was successful for the country in all respects. We were not
affected by political or social turmoil. Thanks to the reforms
conducted, we can see a steady tendency of growth and an increase in
the volume of production. Economic growth has started to fulfil its
main task: ensuring a gradual improvement in the welfare of people and
rectifying their social situation. The government managed this year to
increase the public sector wages and raise assistance to the most
needy part of the population – first of all, to the families of
liberator warriors who died or went missing, to the disabled, to the
war veterans and to the families that have many children. Beginning
from 2005, the state will provide housing for needy families. The
amount of pensions and other social payments will steadily go up. The
wages of those employed in health, education, culture and sports will
also be increased.”

“It is clear that Gukasyan is trying to hide the true state of affairs
with these words,” the head of the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry’s
press centre, Matin Mirza, has told Ekho newspaper. “In fact, 2004 did
not bring anything good to the separatist regime or to the scarce
population of the occupied territories. They see that strength and
justice are on Azerbaijan’s side and with every month that passes,
this becomes clearer for the international community as well. This is
a confirmation of the success of Azerbaijani diplomacy. We see that
Yerevan’s efforts to lure new settlers into the occupied territories
by offering some discounts have failed. All these words are just a
‘show’ and an attempt to play a trick on the uninformed population of
the occupied territories.”

In his statement, Gukasyan went on to say the following: “I especially
want to note that the 2005 state budget envisages a 30-per-cent
increase in social spending. The foundations were laid in 2004 for the
speedy construction of the North-South highway which is of strategic
significance to Armenia in terms of reinforcing its military, economic
and social security.”

In response to this, Sattar Safarov, head of the economic committee of
the Milli Maclis [Azerbaijan’s parliament], said that even if the
revenues are rising in the “NKR”, it happens not because of local
production, but because of Gukasyan’s yearly visits to
Armenian-populated areas in the USA. He regularly cries there,
complains about Azerbaijan’s persecution and gathers millions of
dollars.”

An army funded by diaspora and Washington

Incidentally, America is also to blame for this, Safarov said. “I
personally told officials in the State Department that they are
conducting a two-faced policy. The entire revenue part of the ‘NKR’
budget is 12m dollars (thanks to the contributions of the diaspora),
whereas the army that defends them requires 24-25m dollars every year
for maintenance. Still, the USA presents in various ways some 12m
dollars to the ‘NKR’ every year. Thus, half of the money for the army
is given by overseas Armenians and the other half comes from
Washington.”

“Over the past year, our army has become even stronger and more
prepared for military operations. The problems of the NKR’s defence
army, including the social ones, have been and will be in the focus of
the state. The might of our army allows us to conduct a successful
foreign policy to defend the interests of Artsakh and its people in
the international arena. I assure you that any efforts by Azerbaijan
to upset the peaceful rhythm of our people will be duly repelled by
the NKR’s defence army,” the “president of the NKR” concluded.

The head of the [Azerbaijani] Defence Ministry’s press service, Ramiz
Malikov, described this part of Gukasyan’s statement as “an attempt to
pull the wool over people’s eyes”. “This is self-delusion, the NKR
does not have any foreign policy and they do not even have an
army. Even Armenia itself still does not dare to recognize the
‘NKR’. All this only pursues the objective of deceiving the people.”

In turn, Elxan Mammadov, an expert in conflict studies, said that
Gukasyan does have some grounds for such absurd remarks. “He is
actually in control of the situation in the territory. He receives
sums that are huge for Karabakh from Yerevan and from abroad. The
diaspora gathers some 10m dollars every year for Gukasyan to maintain
the army and buy weapons. Gukasyan simply feels no threat from
Azerbaijan and Baku is not doing anything to make him feel threatened
or at least uncomfortable. Hence, he keeps making such ‘good’
statements.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

The Best Present For Christmas

THE BEST PRESENT FOR CHRISTMAS

Azat Artsakh – Nagorno Karabakh Republic (NKR)
30 Dec 04

`This is the best New Year gift,’ exclaimed one of the spectators
during the concert of the Artsakh Chamber Orchestra on December 25
devoted to Christmas. As the conductor Gevorg Muradian had promised
during the previous concert, the Christmas concert was full of
surprises. Besides the already traditional repertoire the orchestra
performed works corresponding to the festive mood of the day: `Minuet’
and `Joke’ by Bach, waltzes by Strauss, Huno, Hungarian dance by
Brahms, `La Campanella’ by Paganini. Mary Karapetian andthe State
Choir of Artsakh performed `Lullaby’ by Kanachian, `News Went’ by
Satian and `Ave Maria’ by Schubert. `Silent Night’ by Bruber performed
by the orchestra and the choir imparted the concert with special
charm. The concert was closed with ` Jingle Bells’ by James Pierpoint
and `Radetski March’ by Strauss.

SUSANNA BALAYAN.
30-12-2004

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian Amb. in Ukraine predicts good relations with Kiev

ArmenPress
Dec 28 2004

ARMENIAN AMBASSADOR IN UKRAINE PREDICTS GOOD RELATIONS WITH KIEV

KIEV, DECEMBER 28, ARMENPRESS: Armenian ambassador to Ukraine,
Armen Khachatrian, predicted good relations between his country and
the new leadership of Ukraine after Sunday re-run of presidential
elections in which the opposition candidate Viktor Yuschenko defeated
the acting prime minister Viktor Yanukovich. He said his prediction
was based on the fact that Armenia is too striving towards closer
relations with Europe.
“This (good relations with Ukraine) is real, as Ukraine is
likewise interested in Armenia,” he said, citing growing trade
between the two countries. The ambassador acknowledged that the Union
of Ukrainian Armenians called on its members to vote for Yanukovich.
He also said that Armenia has to work a lot to bring political
relations with Ukraine on a new level in view of its defense of
Azerbaijan’s position with regard to Karabagh conflict regulation.
“Ukrainians are very friendly towards the Armenian community and we
have to use its potential,’ he said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Railway communication b/w Armenia & Russia may resume late next year

ArmenPress
Dec 29 2004

RAILWAY COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ARMENIA AND RUSSIA MAY RESUME LATE NEXT
YEAR

MOSCOW, DECEMBER 29, ARMENPRESS: An agreement signed Tuesday in
Moscow by Armenian defense minister Serzh Sarkisian and Russian
transport minister Igor Levitin, who are cochairmen of a joint
inter-governmental commission on economic cooperation is expected to
give a strong boost to further development of trade and economic ties
between these two countries. The agreement, signed during a regular
meeting of the commission in the Russian capital, envisages
cooperation in energy and transport sectors.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting Igor Levitin said a
ferryboat plying between Georgian port of Poti and Russian port of
Kavkaz will be operational beginning next January or February.
Levitin also said that Armenia’s rail communication with Russia via
Georgia, disrupted by the Abkhaz conflict more than a decade ago,
could resume by the end of next year, before the end of the conflict.
Most likely Georgian officials have revised their position on this
issue as until now they used to say they will allow trains from
Abkhazia to go through Georgia only after thousands of Georgian
refugees from Abkhazia are allowed to go back.
In Moscow Russian and Armenian officials also spoke about granting
Armenian citizens some privileges, particulalry, extending their stay
in Russia up to three months without temporary registration.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

What was good; what was watched

The Daily Star, Lebanon
Dec 30 2004

What was good; what was watched
If this year’s big name flicks failed to meet expectations, the
unexpected more than compensated

By Jim Quilty
Daily Star staff

BEIRUT: Writing a “year-end roundup” of cinema in this region is a
schizophrenic operation. The question that immediately arises is what
criteria should be used: What people hereabouts are watching? What is
being made available for them to watch (and in what medium)? Or what
is being made?

In a more integrated market you might imagine some overlap in the
answers to these questions. In this region, though, production and
consumption are generally divorced from one another.

Based on what’s playing in the multiplexes, most folks in this region
watch U.S. cinema. One exception to this rule is Iran, where Western
cinema doesn’t have the same unfettered access as in the Arab world.
Egypt is also exceptional, since the habit of domestic cinema
consumption, if not as voracious as it once was, remains a factor.

Sitting from this publication’s Beirut aerie, then, the two films
that seem to have had the greatest impact on moviegoers in 2004 were
Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9-11” and Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of
the Christ.”

Both received general releases and have done a brisk trade as DVDs.
Indeed, Gibson’s elaborate torture of the Son of Man adorned a number
of area television screens during the Christmas season, evidently
usurping Handel’s “Messiah” as the Easter-to-Christmas cross-over hit
of choice.

Though Middle Eastern characters – whether ancient Palestinians or
contemporary Saudis – played supporting roles in both films, people
here first caught wind of them because of the political patter they
aroused in the U.S. In this sense, local audiences were attracted by
a sense of voyeurism – vis-a-vis America – as much anything else.

If the wide viewing of these intensely ideological films remarks upon
globalization’s march into the region, the political subtext of their
success is no less striking. Taken together, “Fahrenheit 9-11” and
“The Passion of the Christ” are two sides of the ambient post-11
September dialogue.

One, oozing from the pores of an Aussie-American ex-action hero with
conservative-Catholic leanings, is emblematic of fundamentalist
America’s revision of Christ as hero, a sort of prototype Rocky. The
other, leaping from the brain of an overweight Left-populist,
embodies blue-state America’s best smack at mobilizing itself against
those who were so inspired by Gibson’s snuff film.

There has also been local cultural production to offset the Western
cultural imperialism. In purely aesthetic terms, 2004 had as many
positive surprises as disappointments and, in this regard, it’s
tempting to compile a list of “significant” films rather than simply
“good” ones.

The brightest star in the constellation of “Middle East feature film”
comes from the north-western frontier, with Hiner Saleem’s “Vodka
Lemon.” This remarkable movie is written and directed by a
Paris-based “Iraqi Kurd” (though Saleem would contest the label) who
takes some pride in having no film training whatsoever.

Any film that speaks Kurdish, Armenian and Russian could be
hopelessly inaccessible. Set in a snow-bound Kurdish-Armenian
village, where state and economy are so marginal that everyone seems
to be selling themselves to stay alive, “Vodka Lemon” should be truly
grim. Instead it transcends its locality to become pure art, its
visual and spoken language crackling with a humor that is as humane
as it is absurd.

Moving west, the Arab world’s cinema heartland had a sizeable
presence in the year of cinema, though the “heavy hitters” of Egypt’s
industry left an ambivalent impression upon audiences and critics.

Perhaps the most anticipated film of the year was “Alexandria … New
York,” the latest from Egypt’s eminence grise of cinema, Youssef
Chahine. It was also the most disappointing.

As fictional autobiography, “Alexandria … New York” contemplates
Chahine’s ambivalence toward the U.S. It follows the ascent of a
renowned Egyptian filmmaker and his two disrupted love affairs – one
with an American woman, the other with America itself. The movie
suffers from its melodrama, which is compensated by little in the way
of craft.

The one Arab film that might have been more anticipated than
“Alexandria … New York” was “Bab al-Shams,” by Chahine’s protege
Yousri Nasrallah.

An adaptation of a book of the same name by Lebanese novelist Elias
Khoury, the project takes the form of a diptych. Both films –
“Al-Rahil” (The Departure) and “Al-Awda” (The Return) – toured the
festival circuit together, with “Al-Rahil” getting a general release
shortly thereafter.

“Bab al-Shams” was an important film for any number of reasons. It
marks the first time an Arab feature has been made about the
Palestinian dispossession. Secondly both the source material and the
director have a very high profile – Nasrallah is considered one of
the region’s most talented independent filmmakers. Finally the budget
– between $3 and 4 million – was mammoth by local standards and
suggested that the producers wanted the job done right.

For some, it was not. “Al-Rahil” in particular, set largely in
Palestine before and just after the nakba, has the unfortunate look
of a Ramadan musalsala. Unbearably sentimental and utterly alien to
anything that’s come from Khoury’s imagination, its long historical
episodes can, at best, be reasoned away as second-hand nostalgia. On
the other hand, Nasrallah’s loving application of Egyptian pop cinema
conventions to Khoury’s stories might just make them more accessible
– that was certainly the feeling amongst those who watched the film
in Beirut’s Shatilla refugee camp.

Egypt’s more refreshing contribution to 2004’s festival circuit came
from its younger directors. Hana Khalil’s “Ahla al-Awkat,” for
instance, is quite important because (following on the success of
Hani Khalifa’s “Sahar al-Layali”) it marks the industry’s increasing
willingness to compromise commercial imperatives and independent
creativity.

The film has been dismissed in certain circles as a girls’ movie – a
la “The Sweetest Thing” – in an Egyptian idiom. On the other hand the
film cannot be faulted technically and the story (if saccharine) has
touched many for its jokey winks at Egypt’s filmmaking heritage.

Another important Egyptian film, though for completely different
reasons, is Osama Fawzi’s “Baheb al-Cima” (“I Love Cinema”), an
amusing little film set among Egypt’s Coptic community in the
mid-1960s. Aside from its artistic merits – it’s one of the more
entertainingly whacky movies to come out of Egypt in a while – the
film was fascinating for the stink it caused in Egypt itself.

Within weeks of its national release, some Copts protested that its
portrayal of Christian doctrine was demeaning and demanded it be
removed from cinemas and that the production crew be tried for
religious contempt.

If cinema is supposed to hold a mirror up to society, then “Baheb
al-Cima” is one of the most successful films of the year.

Of the bouquet of features to emerge from the Maghreb in 2004, the
one that has received most attention – and deservedly so – is
Moroccan director Mohammed Asli’s “In Casablanca the Angels Don’t
Fly.”

Beautifully shot and gritty, Asli’s film eschews the historical
romance and self-conscious orientalism that marks some of the other
features coming out of North Africa. It follows a trio of Berber
guest workers in Casablanca and the cruel ironies that mark their
lives and dampen their dreams.

The unfortunate consequence of shopping lists like this one is that,
by focussing on features, they tend to overlook some of the year’s
most interesting films – which happen to be shorts. There are too
many excellent shorts to draw up a fair list here, but among the more
interesting projects to emerge have been “Van Express,” a featurette
by Lebanon’s Elie Khalife, and the faux documentary “Like 20
Impossibles,” by Ramallah-based Annemarie Jacir.

Khalife’s film follows the misadventures of a pair of entrepreneurial
scamps who vend coffee on Beirut’s seaside Corniche from their
beat-up

Volkswagen van – until they lose the espresso machine for want of a
license.

In an effort to make money with their only asset, they try using the
van to vend a commodity even more contentious. The film is mercifully
denuded of any trace of the exotic.

Rather a different beast, “Like 20 Impossibles” follows the efforts
of a Palestinian-Israeli film crew to make a film, despite the
inhibitions of Israeli checkpoints. When the crew tries to drive
around the checkpoints, they are held hostage by a squad of Israeli
soldiers who refuse to allow them to either proceed or return to
where they came from.

Understated and precise, the film is a marvellously compact metaphor
for the plight of Palestinian and Israeli civilians trying to work
together.

The most anticipated non-event of 2004 was the general release of
Ziad Doueri’s “Lila Dit Ca” (“Lila Says”), the Lebanese director’s
long-waited follow-up to “West Beyrouth.” Its regional premier at
Beirut’s Middle East Film Festival was disrupted when that festival
was suddenly cancelled. This minor disaster was offset by its
acceptance at 2005’s Sundance Film Festival.

The general release of “Lila Dit Ca” will follow in the new year,
allowing 2004 to bleed nicely into 2005.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress