Armentel Resumes Issue of Easy Cards

ARMENTEL RESUMES ISSUE OF EASY CARDS

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 21. ARMINFO. Under the mobile communication
development program, ArmenTel resumed the sell of mobile communication
cards “Easy Cards” on 21 February through its service points. The
company’s press-service informs ARMINFO.

According to the source, at the first stage, Easy Cards will be issued
to the natural persons who applied to the company on January 19,20, 21
2004. The press- service notes that the purchased cards must be
activated before May 1 2004. Otherwise, they will be cancelled. The
company promised to inform of satisfaction of additional applications
if there are so.

Earlier, Commercial Director of ArmenTel Zakarias Kotsimpos said that
starting from the end of February 2005 the company would start issuing
Easy Cards in the unlimited quantity. It should be noted that the
second operator of mobile communication in Armenia, K-Telecom, intends
to start provision of cellular communication services in Armenia
already in May 2005. At present, the number of mobile communication
subscribers of ArmenTel is some 200,000 people.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Ilham Aliyev and Vladimir Putin Discussed Military-TechnicalCooperat

ILHAM ALIYEV AND VLADIMIR PUTIN DISCUSSED MILITARY-TECHNICAL COOPERATION

MOSCOW, FEBRUARY 17. ARMINFO-TURAN. Working visit of Azeri President
Ilham Aliyev to Russia has concluded. It was devoted to opening of
the Year of Azerbaijan in Russia. Aliyev has held talks with Russian
President Vladimir Putin to discuss development of trade-economic
cooperation, measures to prevent international terrorism, perspectives
of the Karabakh conflict settlement and expanding of humanitarian
and cultural ties.

Russian president press office reports that “presidents have discussed
possibilities of military-technical cooperation between Russia and
Azerbaijan.”

The agreement on military-technical cooperation between Azerbaijan
and Russia was signed in Baku in February 2003 during an official
visit of Russian Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov to Azerbaijan.

During his official visit to Russia Ilham Aliyev has held an unplanned
meeting with Defence Minister to discuss military-technical issues.
Unofficial sources report that the Russian side is going to sell its
weapons to Azerbaijan.

The Karabakh conflict was another subject of negotiations. Russia, as
another OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmen, offers parties to the conflict
to find agreement themselves and mediators could act as guarantors
of the agreement. At the ceremony of opening of Year of Azerbaijan
Putin said “Russia is going to assist to find a worthy settlement of
the Karabakh conflict and safeguard security in this region.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Rights watchdog urges Baku to investigate death of oppositionp

Rights watchdog urges Baku to investigate death of opposition prisoner

Turan news agency, Baku
19 Feb 05

New York, 19 February: The Azerbaijani authorities have to conduct
a fair investigation into the death of prisoner Alqayit Maharramov,
20, who had been jailed for his involvement in the October 2003
developments [post-election riots], the international rights
organization Human Rights Watch has said.

Maharramov, who died in prison No 17, had been sentenced to three
years’ imprisonment. A total of 125 people have been sentenced for
protesting at falsifications in the [15 October 2003 presidential]
elections.

“This is the tragic end of the man and an unfavourable page in the
history of Azerbaijan,” Rachel Denber, acting executive director of
Human Rights Watch for Europe and Central Asia, said. “The Azerbaijani
authorities have to find out the causes [of Maharramov’s death]
and explain what happened to this young man,” she added.

[Passage omitted: reported details]

“Maharramov was one of the dozens of people convicted after October
2003 and his death reaffirms that the government should release or
reconsider the cases of those convicted in connection with those
developments,” Denber said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Human Rights Watch urges European bank to change strategy onAz

Human Rights Watch urges European bank to change strategy on Azerbaijan

Turan news agency, Baku
18 Feb 05

London, 18 February: The human rights situation in Azerbaijan
has deteriorated since the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development [EBRD] approved its strategy on Azerbaijan in 2002,
the well-known human rights organization Human Rights Watch [HRW]
has said in a press release.

The 2003 presidential elections plunged Azerbaijan into an acute
crisis, of which it has not been able to break out yet. Starting
from that juncture, the authorities stepped up pressure on the civil
society, restricted criticism and political activities.

The 2002 EBRD strategy on Azerbaijan maintains that there are many
opposition parties and NGOs in Azerbaijan. However, the atmosphere in
the country has “drastically changed” since then. The authorities have
severely restricted freedom of assembly and public protests, carried
out mass sackings of opposition members and persecuted everyone who
sympathized with the opposition.

The 2003 presidential elections were also marred by such serious
irregularities as disproportionate use of force against protesters,
use of torture against detainees, unfair trials which resulted in an
increase in the number of political prisoners and so on.

What’s more, the authorities stepped up pressure on the civil
society. The case of the Cuma mosque imam, Ilqar Ibrahimoglu, is a
glaring example of this. The authorities also refuse to register NGOs
they do not like such as the fund to develop democracy and protect
human rights.

The authorities vigorously restrict the activities of the mass media,
especially electronic ones, using all means to contain criticism
against the government and initiating physical violence against
opposition journalists.

The 2004 municipal elections confirmed once again that the authorities
do not intend to give up election rigging.

“All this calls into question the Azerbaijani government’s commitment
to the principles of democracy and pluralism mentioned in Article 1
of the agreement on setting up the bank,” the HRW statement said.

The organization recommends that the EBRD make changes to its
strategy on Azerbaijan in the light of the aforesaid evidence and
secure changes in a number of issues.

In particular, HRW reckons that it is necessary:

– to implement the recommendations listed in the report of the OSCE
Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights after the 2003
elections;

– to cancel verdicts against the October prisoners [those arrested
over the 2003 post-election riots], which did not meet international
standards, and to release political prisoners;

– to carry out an independent investigation into reports of torture
and maltreatment in the post-election period and to bring the
culprits to book;

– to reinstate those who were fired for supporting the opposition in
their previous jobs;

– to investigate and punish the culprits of attacks on journalists;

– to decriminalize libel;

– to ensure freedom of assembly, including the right to stage
opposition rallies and so on.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

NKR Parliament Adopts Law On Ombudsman

NKR PARLIAMENT ADOPTS LAW ON OMBUDSMAN

STEPANAKERT, FEBRUARY 18. ARMINFO. Parliament of the Nagorno-Karabakh
Republic adopted in the second and final reading the law “on
ombudsman”. In accordance with the requirements of the law, the
ombudsman will be appointed 2 months after the document’s coming
into force.

ARMINFO’s own correspondent in Stepanakert informs, the ombudsman
will be independent from all the branches of power. Chairman of
permanent commission of NKR National Assembly for foreign relations
Vahram Atanesian is the author of this legislative initiative. He
considers the adoption of the law on ombudsman a very important step.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

The rags-to-riches philanthropist

The rags-to-riches philanthropist

The Daily Telegraph/UK
(Filed: 20/02/2005)

The Mormon billionaire who started out selling eggs has floated his
plastics empire, but Jon Huntsman tells Sylvia Pfeifer Mammon will
still help his charitable mission

Jon Huntsman is not a conventional businessman. On the day that the
self-made billionaire took the chemicals business he founded 35 years
ago to the New York stock market, he cashed in shares worth more than
$100m. It wasn’t that he needed the money â~@~S he has no interest
in the fast cars, yachts or Palm Beach mansions that usually excite
the very rich. Huntsman just wanted to fund his charitable foundations.

Huntsman is one of America’s most successful entrepreneurs. His
rags-to-riches tale of a poor Mormon boy who built up a plastics empire
worth $12bn is the embodiment of the American dream. But Huntsman is
also a noted philanthropist.

Aside from his personal donations, the company’s policy has been to
divide every dollar of free cash flow, putting half into the business
and half into good works. To date, Huntsman has given away some $500m,
both from the company and his own resources.

However, earlier this month, that policy ended when the chemicals
group raised $1.5bn through a partial flotation. Now, Huntsman himself
must keep funding his charities, which range from the Huntsman Cancer
Institute (both his parents died of cancer) to helping Armenia.

So why did he decide to take the group public? And what made him
change his previous famous conviction that commodity businesses are
better off being private? The short answer is that the operating
environment has become more difficult.

“My view has changed dramatically . . . The energy uncertainties,
combined with the whole problems with terrorism and uncertainty in the
economic conditions throughout the world make it very difficult for
an individual to cope with the peaks and valleys that could accompany
a business the size of $12bn . . . I feel very strongly that the
best protection to our shareholders, including our family and other
shareholders, is to be a public company where we have access to equity
markets,” he says in an interview from fresh from ringing the opening
bell at the New York Stock Exchange.

“Our profits will [now] go towards paying down debt. We won’t have
the luxury to direct money towards charitable things,” he says. “I’ll
sell my own stock from time to time. . . to help continue to fund my
own charities.”

Talking to Huntsman at any length is like getting a lesson in business,
ethics and family values all at once. His philanthropic zeal dominates
his conversation. Meanwhile, the company’s annual reports are peppered
with mission statements and family photos of his wife, their nine
children and 52 grandchildren.

His one indulgence, he says, is fly fishing. Aside from that, “business
and my faith are in every way as relaxing as most men and women find
things like golf or yachting”. But it is the weekly visits to the
chemotherapy wards in his cancer hospital “to give the patients a
hug and encouragement” that really energise him, he adds.

Cynics may find such apparent saintliness from a billionaire grating,
but Huntsman sees no difficulty in reconciling faith and money.

“It’s very difficult for me to separate my family from my business,
from my faith, from our charitable work,” he says. “It’s all rolled
into one package.”

The one thing he does preach is that every man should return some
of his fortune to society. This belief no doubt has its roots in his
upbringing. He was born in Blackfoot, Idaho, in 1937, into a family
of devout Mormons. The young Huntsman won a scholarship to Wharton
Business School in Pennsylvania. On graduation, he went to work for
his uncle, selling eggs in Los Angeles â~@~S a job he has often
described as “the worst in America”.

Nevertheless, it was while doing this that he developed the world’s
first plastic egg cartons. An agreement with McDonald’s to supply the
fast-food giant with Styrofoam “clamshell” cartons led him to make a
fortune. In 1970, a couple of deals and lots of borrowed money later,
the Huntsman Corporation was born.

So how did a former egg salesman manage to build up such a huge
chemicals group? His strategy was to buy unwanted assets at distressed
prices. This was best illustrated by the $2.8bn acquisition, in 1999,
of the old chemicals empire of ICI based on Teesside.

The highly profitable deal not only doubled the group’s size but was
personally resonant for Huntsman, who can trace his family roots
back to another UK port â~@~S Liverpool. Somewhat surprisingly,
he describes the Teesside complex as “my favourite place on the
entire earth”.

However, as the acquisitions mounted so did the debt. In 2001, the
family had to sell 49 per cent of the business to Matlin Patterson,
the US venture capital firm, a decision Huntsman describes as “a very
painful experience”.

Today, the restructured Huntsman empire is a mix of commodity and
speciality chemicals. Last year the company secured a £16.5m grant
from the British government to build the world’s biggest producer of
low-density polyethylene on Teesside.

Huntsman is convinced that the chemicals industry is “headed for some
very fine years”. He argues that his company is well-placed to weather
the economic cycles since only one third of its business comes from
commodity chemicals.

Huntsman has no plans to retire yet and remains chairman of the group
after handing operational control to his son Peter in 2000. Over
the next two weeks the family will appoint an independent board of
directors â~@~S six out of the 10 board members will be non-family
â~@~S chosen from some of the best-run corporations across America.

So what advice can he give any budding entrepreneurs out there?
Unsurprisingly, he has no magic answer. Success, he notes, “is a
process that’s surprising even to the individuals involved”.

For anyone in need of more practical views, Huntsman is about to
publish a book on how to become a winner. Entitled Winners Never Cheat:
Everyday Values We Learned as Children (But May Have Forgotten),
the book aims to be a lesson in good management behaviour â~@~S
play by the rules and keep your word, for example â~@~S together
with nuggets of successful techniques.

“It’ll be a fun book,” promises Huntsman. “I think if your goal is
to become wealthy, by and large, you fail. If your goal is to try
to be fair and honest and to build a quality company, step by step,
day by day, someday eventually it evolves into an opportunity to
reach beyond your own expectations.”

–Boundary_(ID_Pe/022Rhpm3VVM9C8/gzQA)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian officer killed in Budapest awarded posthumous medal forbrav

ARMENIAN OFFICER KILLED IN BUDAPEST AWARDED MEDAL FOR BRAVERY POSTHUMOUS

PanArmenian News
Feb 19 2005

19.02.2005 15:46

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ By a decree of Armenian President Robert Kocharian
Armenian officer Gurgen Margarian, who was killed in Budapest, is
awarded with Medal for Bravery for courage and selflessness displayed
during his service. February 19 – on the day of murder of G. Margarian,
killed last year, – the relatives and friends of the Armenian officer,
politicians, culture and science figures as well as public gathered
in Yerablur pantheon.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Lebanon: A Cedar Revolution to Counter Russian Missiles For Damascus

Lebanon: A Cedar Revolution to Counter Russian Missiles For Damascus
By K Gajendra Singh

Al-Jazeera.Info, USA
Feb 18 2005

Al-Jazeerah, February 18, 2005

The US attempt to organize a franchised ‘Cedar’ revolution in Lebanon
, like the Orange revolution in Ukraine and the Rose revolution in
Georgia , is to counter Moscow’s return into Middle East . Russia
would be soon delivering short range missiles to Damascus , to ease
US pressure in Ukraine , Georgia and elsewhere . The sale of missiles
to Syria was finalized during Syrian President Basher Assad’s recent
visit to Moscow. But it could ignite the most inflammable tinderbox
in the region , Lebanon ,which saw its polity and economy stabilised
and rebuilt over the last 15 years following a 15 years of civil war
from 1976 .The consequences would be horrendous . The mayhem of the
civil war had added ‘Lebanonisation’ to the lexicon
Following the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Shafiq
Hariri in Beirut on 14 February , almost spontaneous demonstrations ,
outcries followed by quick US actions like recall of its Ambassador
from Damascus , which has been blamed for the bomb blasts killing
Harari , by innuendo , implication and even directly by some US
lawmakers, as usual cheer led by US led corporate media , looks too
familiar , coming as it does when Russia is to transfer low range
missiles to Damascus .

The organized spontaneity and the cacophony of opposition noises in
Lebanon look like other recent franchised revolutions , in Georgia
and in Ukraine , apart from overthrow of Milosevic in Serbia. While
Europe Union openly sided with USA in the orange revolution in
Ukraine , which will adversely affect its relations with Russia ,this
time France , a former colonial power in Syria and Lebanon joined
Washington,
“If Syria was involved, the move would represent an act of
uncharacteristically brazen recklessness on the part of a regime
instinctively cautious in matters involving its own survival.”, said
Time magazine .Having spent decades in the region the author knows
the Syrians to be sophisticated operators .By having a hand in the
killing of Hariri Syria would not like to commit Harakiri , now under
daily pressure from US and Israel , the latter intrudes into its
sovereign air space and occupies its Golan Heights since 1967
war.,President Assad condemned Hariri’s killing as a “horrible
terrorist act,” but that did not dim the ire of Lebanese opposition
groups and the Bush administration.Syrian forces first arrived in
Beirut in 1976, eventually enforcing a fragile peace between rival
Lebanese factions and armed Palestinian refugees, and running the
country as Syria’s backyard ever since. It now keeps about 15,000
troops in the Beka’a valley. Fresh Lebanese elections are scheduled
for May, and Hariri was under mounting pressure to take the lead in
an opposition campaign to rally a vote for ousting Syrian troops.
Attempts are being made to unite all anti-Syrian factions which
fought a devastating civil war between 1975 and 1990. Christians,
Druze, and Shia and Sunni Muslims were in the funeral procession
numbering in over a hundred thousand . The US assistant secretary of
state, William Burns, who attended the funeral, said Hariri’s death
must give renewed impetus to achieving a free, independent and
sovereign Lebanon, and “what that means is the complete and immediate
withdrawal by Syria of all of its forces in Lebanon”.
The US, with the backing of France, pushed through UN Security
Council resolution 1559 in September, calling on Syria to withdraw
its troops. Jacques Chirac, the French president, a personal friend
of Hariri, flew to Beirut to offer his condolences. He praised Hariri
for his fight for democracy and independence. Lebanon government has
resisted pressure for an international investigation on the murder,
but has invited Swiss explosives experts to help.
Resolution 1559 has been strenuously resisted not only by Syria, but
also by the pro-Damascus Lebanese authorities, particularly President
Emile Lahoud. The White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said that
Hariri’s murder was “an attempt to stifle these efforts to build an
independent, sovereign Lebanon, free of foreign domination.” Eyes are
now turned to the Security Council to see if a new resolution is
passed, perhaps imposing more sanctions on Syria.. Russia is angry
with US and will not cooperate nor would perhaps China.

President Assad’s extension of Lahoud’s mandate last September –
triggered the confrontation between Syria and the opposition – is
seen as a sign of firmness in facing up to American and French
pressures. Lebanese government officials and Syrian allies have
accused the opposition of being in the pocket of the United States
and Israel.

It appears that Hariri was leaning toward formally joining the
opposition, which he had hesitated to do. Apart from having in the
most prominent Lebanese Sunni, widening the opposition front’s
multi-sectarian base; it would also have brought Hariri’s ample purse
to support opposition in the elections next spring. “Hariri was the
natural cornerstone of a post-Syrian-withdrawal shadow
government.”BBC re-telecast a “Hard Talk” interview after 11
September, 2001 in which Hariri refused to declare Hizbullah a
terrorist organization and instead declared Israel an enemy.Syria has
cultivated politicians from all ends of the sectarian divide, and
controlling Lebanon’s own intelligence and security services. More
than visions of historic “Greater Syria” concept” there are certainly
economic benefits for Syria to maintain control over its economically
dynamic neighbor whose progress and integration into the world
economy puts Syria’s own decrepit economy to shame. But Lebanon’s
primary importance to Damascus is its value as a strategic trump
card. The organizing principle of Syrian foreign policy over the past
four decades has been to find ways of pressuring Israel to return the
Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since the war of 1967. Syria’s
presence in Lebanon, and particularly its support for the Iran-backed
Hezbollah militia, became its key strategic bargaining chips with
Israel, its Lebanese proxies have posed a constant security on
Israel’s northern border for the past quarter century. Losing Lebanon
would strip a regime already dangerously isolated within the Arab
world of the last of its leverage in dealing with Israel. “said Time
magazine.The U.N. Security Council approved a statement urging the
Lebanese government to “bring to justice the perpetrators, organizers
and sponsors of this heinous terrorist act.” Lebanon’s interior
minister suggested a suicide bomber aided by “international parties”
may have been behind it.
Apart from a rogue Syrian intelligence operatives, even factions
among Lebanon’s myriad religious groups have been accused . Lebanese
authorities have described responsibility claims by previously
unknown Islamic militants as not credible.
In Washington for meetings with Vice President Dick Cheney and Ms
Rice, the Egyptian foreign minister, Ahmed About Gheit, said “it is
still premature to reach conclusions” about Hariri’s assassination.
Speaking at the Brookings Institution thinktank, Gheit said he hoped
it would not touch off a cycle of killings and push Lebanon into
civil war.
Real reason –Russian Misssiles for Syria ;On 16 February , Moscow
confirmed that it will sell a new air defence missile system to
Syria, overlooking Israeli concern followed by US objections. It said
it was only for close-range use and would not upset the balance of
military forces in the Middle East. The system would be mounted on
vehicles and could not be stripped down for man-portable
shoulder-launch use. “This type of system is not mobile, these are
not man-portable anti-aircraft systems, and without special means of
transport their use is impossible,” a Russian official said. He also
repeated Moscow’s recent denials of any plans to sell longer-range
tactical Iskander missiles to Syria, which could reach any target in
Israel , including its nuclear reactor Dimona.
“Negotiations are now taking place on delivery to Damascus of the
Strelets close-range anti-air system,” Interfax news agency quoted an
unnamed senior defence ministry official.
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said at a news conference on 16
February in Jerusalem that Israel was informed by Russia that a sale
of weapons to Syria would go ahead despite Israeli objections. “We
worry about that and we don’t think that that should have happened,”
he added .
Russian President Vladimir Putin said last month that the sale would
not upset the balance of power in the Middle East and that it
involved equipment that could solely be used for defensive purposes.
He said in an interview with daily the Jerusalem Post that “we won’t
bring to the region weapons that can be used by terrorists or that
can be transferred to terrorists without controls.”
Another country , Afghanistan also had foreign soldiers , which the
US led West and conservative Muslim regimes went to oust in 1979 and
to establish democracy .That country lies destroyed and shattered ,
even though the Soviet Russian troops left in 1989 .In came Talebans
and Al Qaida which stunned USA on September 11 , 2001 .Elections were
recently held in Afghanistan , over which US President George W, Bush
crowed , without “convincing” many except his media brain washed
supporters in USA .These could be conducted only with help from
democrat Gen Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan , where the opposition is
up in arms against his keeping on the military uniform . Gen
Musharraf persuaded the Mujahddins , Talebans and war lords to let
elections be held . He was promptly rewarded by USA in hundreds of
US$ millions of aid.
US Reaction to Hariris’s Death;
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice asked US allies to join in
pressurising Syria to end its presence in Lebanon and its support of
terrorism. She told the US Congress, if other countries “send Syria a
message” that its conduct is unacceptable, “then perhaps the Syrians
will start to worry more about their isolation . . . politically and
economically.” Rice said that the message sent by recalling the US
ambassador was “an important one, and we’ll see how they respond.”
She added that other measures were possible, saying, “We continue to
review what else we might do.” She did acknowledge that it was not
clear who was behind Hariri’s killing, but US administration argued
that Syria’s presence in Lebanon was responsible for such attacks.

The Syrians came in Damascus after an accord in 1976, while USA
invaded Syria’s neighbour Iraq against the wishes of the UN .It has
not given much convincing explanations for mayhem carried out in that
country . On Iraq , USA remains isolated , has shown little
accountability under Geneva conventions and the man who advised
ignoring the conventions will become like minister of interior in
other countries .
Ms Rice did admit that no other country imposed economic and trade
sanctions against Damascus, which the U.S. Congress did two years
ago. US threatened to impose more sanctions .But “there’s no doubt
that Syria is a big problem,” she told members of the Senate Foreign
Affairs Committee for 2006 budget discussions. Both Republicans and
Democrats on the committee told Rice that the United States should be
forceful in its dealings with Damascus. “I urge you not to let Syria
off the hook,” said Sen. George Allen

But Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who grilled Rice during hearings ,
even questioning her integrity added a realty check .She said
Americans were told before the war on Iraq that U.S. allies would
help cover the cost of the mission, now estimated to total about $250
billion. In giving new aid to the coalition partners, including
Poland and Ukraine, “in essence, we’re paying them for what they
did,” Boxer said. “We were told there would be financial burden
sharing; and at the end of the day, there isn’t.”

Even the U.S. House of Representatives joined in condemning Syria (
as yet without any proof) , paid tribute to Rafik Hariri, and called
for Syria to withdraw troops from Lebanon. US troops are staying in
Iraq for stability not Syria’s in Lebanon.A resolution is under
consideration to honor Hariri but the session was devoted to
criticism of Syria’s continuing occupation of Lebanon. Another
Congressman recalled the demonstrations by Lebanese calling for
Syria’s withdrawal from Lebanon as the key issue for Lebanon. “There
is no proof that Syria was directly responsible for this
assassination,” he said. “But there is no doubt that Syria has
remained in Lebanon far longer either than their mandate, or than in
the agreements under the Taif Accords of 1989.”Congressman Eliot
Engel, who wrote the Syria Accountability Act Congress approved last
year imposing sanctions on Damascus, has urged the Bush
administration to ensure that the Syria Accountability Act is fully
implemented. That law calls on Syria, among other things, to halt
support for terrorism, end its occupation of Lebanon, and stop
development of any weapons of mass destruction and ballistic
missiles. “It is clear to me, although the evidence is being
gathered, but I suspect that this assassination has some ties to
Damascus, to the regime in Damascus,” he noted. “The Syrians have
allowed Lebanon to destablize, and this is part and parcel of the
result.During her safari the Europeans listened and clapped politely
to Ms Rice , but were hardly overwhelmed with the marketing of the
same US agenda , only less stridently than the boss. She might be
considered eloquent but hardly convincing .
Iran – Syria United Front ;
Iran and Syria threatened daily by the Bush administration and the
Israel government, on 16 February formed a mutual self-defence pact
to confront the “threats” facing them. This was announced after a
meeting in Tehran between the Iranian vice-president, Mohammed Reza
Aref, and the Syrian prime minister, Naji al-Otari.” At this
sensitive point, the two countries require a united front due to
numerous challenges,” said Otari. Aref added: “We are ready to help
Syria on all grounds to confront threats.” Syria and Iran have been
together in the past too .
Of course while US leaders make conflicting statements on Iran’s
nuclear program ,Israeli Foreign Minister, Silvan Shalom, speaking in
London predicted that Tehran would have the knowledge to produce a
nuclear weapon within six months. He said that Iran was preparing
nuclear weapons that would be able to target “London, Paris and
Madrid” by the end of the decade. “We believe the Iranians will never
abandon their dreams” of nuclear weapons, Shalom said. “It is not
Israel’s problem any more, it is the world’s problem.” It is a
strange statement coming from Israel , which reportedly has over 100
nuclear bombs.Historical Background;

When the armies of Islam erupted from the Arabian desert and carved
an empire from the Atlantic to China in the 7th Century , Lebanon
with its mountains provided refuge for persecuted Christian and
Muslim sects alike. After Ottomans annexed the caliphate and
guardianship of Mecca and Medina in 16th century, the region became a
peaceful backwater until World War I. During Ottoman era Lebanon
evolved a social and political system of its own. Ottoman Aleppo or
Tripoli governed the north, Damascus the centre, and Sidon the south.
Coastal Lebanon and al-Biqah valley were usually ruled more directly
by Istanbul, while Mt. Lebanon enjoyed semiautonomous status.

But when Turkey sided with Germany in the First World War , Britain,
to protect its Indian possessions and the Suez Canal lifeline,
encouraged Arabs under Hashemite ruler Sharif Hussein of Hijaj to
revolt against the caliph in Istanbul (and deputed spy T E Lawrence
to help out). The war’s end did not bring freedom to the Arabs as
promised; because , at the same time, by secret Sykes-Picot
agreement, the British and French arbitrarily divided the sultan’s
Arab domains and their warring populations of Shi’ites, Sunnis,
Alawite Muslims, Druse, and Christians. The French took most of
greater Syria, dividing it into Syria and Christian-dominated
Lebanon. The British kept Palestine, Iraq and the rest of Arabia.

When Sharif Hussein’s son Emir Feisel arrived to claim Damascus,
Syria, the French chased him out. So the British installed him on the
Iraqi throne. When the other son, Emir Abdullah, turned up in Amman,
British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, dining in a Jerusalem
hotel, reportedly drew on a napkin the borders of a new Emirate of
Trans-Jordan, encompassing wasteland vaguely claimed by Syrians,
Saudis and Iraqis.

By the 1917 Balfour Declaration Britain had also promised a homeland
for Jews in Palestine. European Jews began emigrating to Palestine,
and the trickle became a flood with the rise of anti-Semitic policies
in Nazi Germany and elsewhere in Europe. After World War II, the
state of Israel, carved out of British Palestine, was not recognized
by the Arabs. The 1948 Arab-Israeli war allowed Israel to expand its
area, while Jordan annexed the West Bank and Egypt took over Gaza. In
the Six-Day War of 1967, Israel captured the West bank and Gaza and
Syria’s Golan heights. Thus were laid the foundations for most of the
problems of the region.

The contemporary state of Lebanon came into being in 1920 when
France, administered it as a League of Nations mandate. The
Maronites, strongly pro-French by tradition, welcomed this, and
during the next 20 years, while France held the mandate, the
Maronites were favoured. The expansion of prewar Lebanon into Greater
Lebanon, however, changed the balance of the population. Although the
Maronites were the largest single element, they no longer formed a
majority. The population was more or less equally divided between
Christians and Muslims, and a large section of it wanted neither to
be ruled by France nor to be part of an independent Lebanon, but
rather to join Syrian or an Arab state

Lebanon became a republic in 1926 and achieved independence in 1943.
Its rugged, mountainous terrain served throughout history as an
asylum for diverse religious and ethnic groups and for political
dissidents. The majority of Lebanese now are Muslims ,( with Shiite
the most numerous ) followed by Christians with Maronites the largest
group, Greek Orthodox and Greek Catholics , and Druzes and Armenians
and, even a very small minority of Jews. Lebanon is one of the most
densely populated countries in the Mediterranean area. It has one of
the highest rates of literacy.

Lebanon is a republic with a parliamentary system of government. Its
constitution, promulgated in 1926 during the French mandate was
modified by several subsequent amendments. According to the 1989 Taif
agreement, parliamentary seats are apportioned equally between
Christian and Muslim sects, thereby replacing an earlier ratio that
had favoured Christians. This sectarian distribution is also observed
in appointments to public office and jobs.

The head of state is the president, who is elected by a two-thirds
majority of the National Assembly for a term of six years and is
eligible for reelection only after the lapse of an additional six
years. By an unwritten convention, the president must be a Maronite
Christian, the premier a Sunnite Muslim, and the speaker of the
National Assembly a Shiite. The Cabinet members’ portfolios are
organized to reflect the sectarian balance and holds more executive
power than the president. It requires a vote of confidence from the
assembly. A Cabinet usually falls because of internal dissension,
societal strife, or pressure exerted by foreign states. The control
of the official central government is at best precarious; sectarian
militias and foreign countries exert great influence .

Lebanon has to grapple with internal problems of social and economic
organization, and also to struggle to define its position in relation
to Israel, to its Arab neighbours, and to Palestinian refugees living
in Lebanon. The Lebanese pluralistic communal structure eventually
collapsed under the pressures of this struggle. Communal rivalries
over political power became so exacerbated by the complex issues that
arose from the Palestinian question that a breakdown of the
governmental system resulted from an extremely damaging civil war
that began in 1975.

The civil war was a catastrophe for the Lebanese, whose country lay
in ruins. There seemed to be no compromise acceptable to the Muslims,
who numbered more than half the population, and to the Christians,
who were determined to keep their control of key government
institutions. Foreign intervention merely restrained open, full scale
warfare. Economic destruction was massive, but this was overcome to a
certain extent by increased remittances from Lebanese working abroad
during the boom years in the oil-producing countries.

Then Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to eliminate Palestine Libration
Organisation (PLO) , a law into itself ., which had been expelled
from Jordan in early 1970s .PLO Chief Yasser Arafat had to leave
Beirut, but under the command and neglect of Defence Minister ,
thousands of helpless Palestinians , mostly women, children and old
men were butchered by Christian militia, Israel’s allies .
A year after the Israeli withdrawal in 1982 from southern Lebanon,
Hezbollah—Lebanon’s main resistance force in the region—refused to
consider that the country had regained its full sovereignty, since
Israel still controlled the Sheba farms enclave and had not released
all Lebanese prisoners of war, and Israeli warplanes patrolled
Lebanese skies at will.
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks in the U.S., Lebanon
tried to walk a tightrope. Lebanese officials were at pains to stress
their condemnation of the attacks against civilians, while at the
same time, they emphasized the distinction between terrorism and the
struggle for liberation. Bush’s statement for a Palestinian state was
welcomed by Lebanese officials, who were under international pressure
to naturalize about 330,000 Palestinian refugees in Lebanon . They
were uneasy, about Washington targeting Hezbollah for attack as a
terrorist organization.

In 1980s , the West had supported Iraq’s long war against Ayatollah
Khomeini’s Iran, and the US had granted loans to Baghdad worth
billions of dollars. For strategic reasons Syria sided with Iran .But
in 1990-91 Gulf War , Syria along with most of the Arab world and
Turkey joined Papa Bush coalition for various reasons , Iraq’s
invasion of Kuwait, money , cutting Saddam Hussein down to size ,
when Iraq at great human and money cost had stopped Khomeini’s
Shiite revolution from expanding in the Arab world .Ironically ,
Shiite of Iraq have now become a major force after 30 January
elections in Iraq . In both US led wars against Iraq, Israel and
unwittingly Iran have gained .
This article was submitted by the author for publication at
Al-Jazeerah on Feb 17, 2005. It was also published by Saag.com.

–Boundary_(ID_a5ZhVvPiBhgOl119smjdhA)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Glendale: Understanding Lebanese Armenians

Understanding Lebanese Armenians
By ANI AMIRKHANIAN

Glendale News Press
Feb 19 2005

Third in a three-part series.

In the past weeks I have been looking at the relationships between
Armenian sub-groups. Now, I want to turn my attention to the Lebanese
Armenians, the last sub-group I will be discussing in this series.
Like the other two Armenian sub-groups, the Lebanese Armenian community
is isolated in its own enclave and members tend to group with their
“own kind.”

Perhaps the most distinguishing characteristic, in my opinion, about
Lebanese Armenians or “Arevmedahyes,” as they are known, is their
very distinctive dialect. Although the other groups speak in their
own dialects, the Lebanese Armenian dialect varies the most from the
other two.

I cannot remember a time when the three groups ever came together for
a mutual goal. There has always been a divide among the sub-groups
regarding their actions and understanding.

Lebanese-Armenians have always seemed to me to be the more “patriotic”
and most proud Armenians of their culture. That is not to say
that the other two groups are not proud of their heritage, but the
Lebanese-Armenian community has always been involved with activism
and progressive politics.

I recently spoke with a Lebanese Armenian college friend of mine
named Natalie who shared with me some of her observations about the
sub-groups and their relationship to each other.

“I always thought that Arevmedahyes and Barskahyes [Iranian-Armenians]
which are both Spurkahyes [Diaspora Armenians] got along but were
both doing their own thing to benefit the Armenians acculturating as
opposed to assimilating in the U.S.,” Natalie said.

She said “own thing” referring to both groups working separately but
for the same cause. Natalie also said that the different dialects and
cultural differences of the two groups has fueled these Armenians to
go about upholding the Armenian culture in their own way — separately.

Historically, Barskahyes and Lebanese-Armenians have had a positive
relationship even though they have gone about their own ways —
knowing they were striving to succeed for a common cause.

I do agree with Natalie’s thoughts about these sub-groups, but what
strikes me the most is that they still remain apart and have yet to
establish long-term relationships outside of community and cultural
activism. What keeps them apart in particular is their language or
dialectical disparity.

The dialects of the Barskahye and Arevmedahye sub-groups are on two
separate ends of the spectrum. I also asked Natalie what she thinks
about the relationship between Lebanese-Armenians and Hayastansis.
She said it is one where they intermingle and get along, but what
sets them apart from Lebanese-Armenians and even Barskahyes is their
mind-set.

The former groups are “more westernized in their train of thought,
since they did not grow up under the controlled government of
communism, as Hayastansis did,” Natalie said.

Another Lebanese-Armenian I spoke with, my cousin-in-law Hrant,
also agreed that the sub-groups are more cooperative and have just
got used to each other. Hrant said he had difficulty in the past
understanding the Barskahye dialect.

“I remember when I first came to the U.S. my only real problem was
understanding my sister’s Barskahye friends,” Hrant said. “But then
I mostly figured out their dialect.”

He also said that as a Lebanese-Armenian, he has noticed that the
sub-groups intermarry a lot more. For example, more Barskahye women
are marrying Lebanese-Armenian men.

Despite greater interaction between all three sub-groups, there is
yet still a divide when it comes to “intimate socializing,” he said.

“Most people still prefer to be with their own group,” said Hrant.
“Language, happens to be a prominent reason why Armenians in general
stick with their ‘own kind.'”

There is no denying that to coexist, language plays an important
role with the Armenian sub-groups. The only time when language is
not an issue is when Armenians of any sub-group speak in English,
which in turn the subject of disparity among the sub-groups fades out.

It seems unusual that when Armenian sub-groups speak another language
other than their own, they all become “Armenian” as one group. The
disparity becomes irrelevant.

So then does belonging to a sub-group give people a sense of a more
focused identity?

According to Hrant, “Time still tends to blend everything together
… ”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

WCC leader sees destabilization effort

WCC leader sees destabilization effort

Indianapolis Star
Feb 19 2005

The Lebanese moderator of the World Council of Churches said this week
that the assassination of his country’s former prime minister was a
“tragedy of far-reaching consequences” and an attempt to destabilize
the country.

Former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and at least 13 others were killed
Monday when a massive car bomb exploded as Hariri’s motorcade drove
through Beirut.

“After a long war, security in Lebanon was being re-established and
reconciliation was happening,” Catholicos Aram I, the WCC moderator
and head of the Armenian Apostolic Church (see of Cilicia), said at a
news conference in Geneva, where the international ecumenical body’s
central committee was meeting.

“This assassination was an attempt to destabilize the situation,”
Ecumenical News International, the Geneva-based news agency, quoted
Aram I as saying.

Aram’s comments echoed those of other Arab leaders.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress