BAKU: Mass: Report of the fact-finding mission aims at promotion ofn

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
March 11 2005

STEVEN MANN: “REPORT OF THE FACT-FINDING MISSION AIMS AT PROMOTION OF NEGOTIATION PROCESS”
[March 11, 2005, 15:13:06]

Steven Mann, the US co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group recommends to
read the Report of the fact-finding mission on results of visit to
the occupied areas of Azerbaijan after it is disclosed: “The people
should understand that the Report of the fact-finding mission aims
at promotion of the negotiation process. This is desired by both the
Minsk Group co-chairs and the United States Government.”

Mr. Steven Mann did not make any comments on the Report to be
disclosed next Friday in Vienna at the OSCE Permanent Council’s
meeting in Vienna, saying he did not want to make any conclusion until
that time. But he added: “I am convinced that the document has been
prepared in detail and professionally. Specialists under the guide
of Emil Haber have done their work at high level”.

On March 10, the ambassador taking part at the discussions on
“Caspian gas and energy safety of Europe” expressed satisfaction with
the course of talks concerning the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. Mr.
Steven Mann, who is also the Department of State special advisor on
Caspian energy diplomacy says the Karabakh problems takes much of
his tame. “The good news is that I am always busy. And that means
the talks between sides continue”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: Armenia rejects Turkish offer for joint study on ‘genocide’

Turkish Daily News
Friday, March 11 2005

Armenia rejects Turkish offer for joint study on ‘genocide’
Friday, March 11, 2005

ANKARA – Turkish Daily News

The Armenian government turned down a proposal offered by Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan for a joint study to be conducted
by Turkish and Armenian historians on allegations that the Armenians
were subject to a genocide at the hands of the late Ottoman Empire in
the beginning of the last century.

Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian dismissed the offer,
which Erdogan announced after a solidarity meeting with main
opposition party leader Deniz Baykal in Ankara, as “groundless,” the
Anatolia news agency said.

“We have opened our archives to those people who claim there was a
genocide. If they are sincere, they should also open their archives,”
Erdogan said on Monday. “Teams of historians from both sides should
conduct studies on these archives. We are ready to take steps on this
issue.”

Turkey denies Armenian allegations that 1.5 million Armenians were
killed as part of a systematic attempt to exterminate them, or
genocide, from 1915-1918. It says the Armenians were the victims of a
partisan fight, during which Turks were also killed and accuses the
Armenians of attacking the Turkish population in eastern Anatolia as
they sided with invading Russian forces.

Oskanian, conversely, maintained that the issue was settled, saying
historians had already said what they had to say. “They have nothing
else to do,” he was quoted as saying.

The Turkish side argues that Armenian allegations are not
scientifically supported. Parliament is preparing to send a letter to
the British House of Lords and House of Commons asking British
lawmakers to declare a book titled “The Treatment of Armenians in the
Ottoman Empire, 1915-1916,” one of the basic sources referred to by
Armenians in their allegations, as wartime propaganda material.
Historian Arnold Toynbee and British diplomat James Bryce wrote the
book during the World War I era. The Turkish side says the book was
designed to convince neutral countries, particularly the United
States, to get involved in the war by portraying Ottoman forces as
“inhumane creatures.”

Armenian campaign picks up momentum in US:

A powerful Armenian lobby in the United States has launched an
initiative to win the administration’s backing for its genocide
allegations.

Efforts made by the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA),
a radical diaspora group, urge Armenians in the United States to send
letters to President George W. Bush, asking him to “properly
recognize” the allegations of genocide. ANCA underlined in a
statement that there were rifts in Turkish-U.S ties and called on
Armenians to make use of this situation.

Bill on new autonomies of Russian Federation blackballed

Bill on new autonomies of Russian Federation blackballed

11.03.2005, 15.56

MOSCOW, March 11 (Itar-Tass) – The Russian State Duma turned down on
Friday the proposed facilitated procedure for the inclusion in the
Russian Federation, as its new subjects, of the autonomies of the
former Union republics of the USSR.

The majority of MPs were of the opinion that such a document was apt
to jeopardise the territorial integrity of Russia and to give
â~@~the autonomies pseudo-sovereigntyâ~@~].

The parliamentarians blackballed the first reading of the amendments
to the constitutional law on the procedure of admitting new subjects
to the Russian Federation or forming them within it, which were
designed to facilitate this procedure for the autonomies of the
former Union republics of the USSR, the status of which is still
undetermined. Ninety-one Duma members backed the bill, while 300
votes were needed to approve it.

The bill was masterminded by the â~@~Rodinaâ~@~] faction, which
moved to facilitate the procedure of including new autonomies in the
Russian Federation â~@~on the basis of the expressed will of their
population, endorsed by means of a nation-wide referendumâ~@~]. The
two houses of the Russian parliament were to be vested with the right
to submit to the president recommendations on the new subjects of the
Federation.

The authors of the bill noted that â~@~in view of the lately
increasing attempts of some states, namely the former Soviet
republics of Georgia, Azerbaijan and Moldova, to extend their
sovereignty to the territories of the unrecognised republics of
Abkhazia, Adzharia, South Ossetia, Nagorny-Karabakh and the Dniester
Moldovan Republic, it is particularly timely today to assess the
legality and juridical validity of such claimsâ~@~].

â~@~This problem is aggravated by the fact that the governments of
the listed countries often accuse Russia of backing the
â~@~Xseparatismâ~@~Y of those unrecognised republics,â~@~] the MPs
noted.

However, the parliamentary majority refused to back the concept of
the bill. Yuri Konev, who heads the corresponding committee of the
State Duma, stated that approval of this document would jeopardise
the territorial integrity of Russia and would give â~@~the
autonomies pseudo-sovereigntyâ~@~]. â~@~The document contradicts the
international law,â~@~] he stressed.

–Boundary_(ID_QBGA/JH4J5h81LGlwZ4vMQ)–

Workers Of Yerevan Fairs Demand Changing Tax Legislation

WORKERS OF YEREVAN FAIRS DEMAND CHANGING TAX LEGISLATION

YEREVAN, MARCH 10. ARMINFO. Some 250 workers of Yerevan fairs are
rallying near the government building today to demand changing
Armenia’s tax legislation.

Particularly the ralliers are protesting against the laws on cash
registers and simplified tax. They have not decided yet if they will
send a delegation to the government.

The ralliers say that they pay 1,500-3,000 AMD a day or 300-1,500
USD a month to their fair directors.

They say that they were instructed to come to the government building
by some man who has not appeared himself though.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia Bets On NATO

ARMENIA BETS ON NATO
Samvel Martirosyan

Eurasianet
3/10/05

As part of its expansion into the South Caucasus, the North Atlantic
Treaty Organization (NATO) is taking a more active interest in
longtime Russian ally Armenia. A visit by NATO Secretary General
envoy Robert Simmons last month marked the high point for
Armeniaâ~@~Ys ties with the Western defense alliance, and Yerevan
seems eager to maintain the momentum.

Simmonsâ~@~Y February 23-24 visit at times appeared a careful
balancing act. In statements with Armenian Defense Minister Serge
Sarkisian, the NATO representative took care to emphasize that
stronger relations with NATO should not be cause for concern in
Moscow about the countryâ~@~Ys participation in the Collective
Security Treaty Organization, the post-Soviet defense alliance made
up of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,Tajikistan and Russia.

“We do not compete in the region, but are building a constructive
partnership, including also [with] Russia, which is an active player
in CSTO [the Collective Security Treaty Organization],” Simmons told
reporters. “Armeniaâ~@~Ys participation in CSTO does not affect in
any way the degree of its relationship with NATO.”

To reinforce that line, emphasis was placed on collective initiatives
that have included Russian participation or an international focus
â~@~S in particular, the deployment of Armenian peacekeepers to
Kosovo and Iraq as well as contributions made by Yerevan to the
US-backed campaign against international terrorism. A group of NATO
consultants is scheduled to travel to Armenia to advise the Armenian
defense ministry on various defense programs, but details of this
assistance have not been released.

Nonetheless, NATO has not been reticent about carving out its own
niche in the region. In March 1 testimony before the US Senate Armed
Services Committee, NATO Supreme Allied Commander General James Jones
stated that the Caucasus has become a strategically important region
for the alliance.

“The Caucasus is increasingly important to our interests. Its air
corridor has become a crucial lifeline between coalition forces in
Afghanistan and our bases in Europe”, said Jones. “In addition to
maintaining our traditional lines of communication and access, we
seek access to new facilities and routine freedom of transit to the
Black Sea, the Caucasus, the Levant, and Africa in order to advance
U.S. national interests.”

As part of that initiative, NATO signed a transit agreement with
Georgia on March 2 that would allow the alliance to ferry supplies
for its International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan via
Georgian air space, roads and railways.

Over the past year, Armenia has been actively developing its own
cooperation with the collective, too. In November 2004, NATO
Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer paid an official visit to
Yerevan in which he described NATOâ~@~Ys relationship with Armenia as
“developing very well, indeed.” The government has turned a deaf ear
to public protests about the deployment of peacekeeping troops to
Iraq, and is currently at work on an Individual Partnership Action
Plan (IPAP), reportedly scheduled for release soon, that would form a
crucial first step toward eventual NATO membership. In September 2004
President Robert Kocharian appointed veteran diplomat Samvel
Mkrtchian to act as the countryâ~@~Ys representative to NATO
headquarters in Brussels, a position previously filled by
Armeniaâ~@~Ys Belgian ambassador.

But more than a desire to stay on the right side of the West â~@~S a
rising influence in the Caucasus — could drive Armeniaâ~@~Ys NATO
interest. A December 2004 poll by the Armenian Center for National
and International Studies showed that most Armenians favor membership
in both NATO and the expanding European Union. [For additional
information, see the Eurasia Insight archive]. One opposition bloc
â~@~S made up of the Liberal Progressive Party, the Republic Party
and former Foreign Affairs Minister Raffi Hovannisian â~@~S has
already been formed with the express intention of securing
Armeniaâ~@~Ys exit from the CTSO in favor of NATO and strengthening
Armeniaâ~@~Ys focus on the West.

Commenting on the results of Simmonsâ~@~Y visit, Armenian Defense
Minister Serge Sarkisian emphasized that further cooperation with the
defense collective is in the works. “Iâ~@~Yd like to once again state
that we are going to keep up the adopted direction and develop our
ties,” he stressed.

That cooperation, however, has not been without its stumbling blocks.
In June 2004, President Robert Kocharian refused to attend a NATO
summit meeting in Istanbul, citing strained relations with Turkey, a
NATO member state with which Armeniaâ~@~Ys dealings have long been
acrimonious. Nor have ties with fellow Partnership for Peace member
Azerbaijan proven particularly collegial. Much attention continues to
focus on an Azerbaijani military officerâ~@~Ys brutal axe murder of
an Armenian counterpart at a February 2004 Partnership for Peace
training session in Budapest. Fearing for their security, two
Armenian parliamentarians did not attend a November 2004 NATO seminar
in Baku.

Armeniaâ~@~Ys dispute with Azerbaijan over the breakaway region of
Nagorno-Karabakh perhaps poses one of the largest obstacles to
further NATO cooperation, government officials say. “If we didnâ~@~Yt
have an unsettled conflict, we would have more opportunities to
participate in such programs,” the defense ministryâ~@~Ys press
service quoted Sarkisian as saying.

If meant as a diplomatic hint for NATO assistance with
Nagorno-Karabakh, however, the statement failed to secure a desirable
response. Simmons categorically rejected the notion that NATO might
dispatch peacekeeping troops to Nagorno-Karabakh in a bid to end that
conflict. “NATO does not directly participate in conflict resolution
and doesnâ~@~Yt discuss the issue of locating its peacekeeping forces
in the region.”

Editorâ~@~Ys Note: Samvel Martirosyan is a Yerevan-based journalist
and political analyst.

–Boundary_(ID_sfpAL/sUjt+lnWk+kh/B9g)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.eurasianet.org

Half a Million Gather for Pro-Syrian Rally to Defy Vision of US

Half a Million Gather for Pro-Syrian Rally to Defy Vision of US
by Robert Fisk in Beirut

Wednesday, March 9, 2005 by the
Independent (UK)

It was a warning. They came in their tens of thousands, Lebanese Shia
Muslim families with babies in arms and children in front, walking past
my Beirut home. They reminded me of the tens of thousands of Iraqi
Shia Muslims who walked with their families to the polls in Iraq,
despite the gunfire and the suicide bombers.

And now they came from southern Lebanon and the Bekaa to say they
rejected America’s plans in Lebanon, and wanted – so they claimed –
to know who killed Rafiq Hariri, the former prime minister murdered
on 14 February, and to reject UN Security Council Resolution 1559
which demands a Syrian withdrawal from Lebanon and the disarmament
of the Hizbollah guerrilla movement, and to express their “thanks”
to Syria. This was a tall order in Lebanon.

But only 100 yards from the Lebanese opposition protests, the
half-million – for that was an approachable figure, given Hizbollah’s
extraordinary organisational abilities – stood for an hour with
Lebanese flags, and posed a challenge to President George Bush’s
project in the Middle East. “America is the source of terrorism”,
one poster proclaimed. “All our disasters come from America”.

Many of those tens of thousands were Hizbollah families who had
fought the Israelis during their occupation of southern Lebanon,
been arrested by the Israelis, imprisoned by the Israelis and feared
that American support for Lebanon meant not “democracy” but an imposed
Israeli-Lebanese peace treaty.

There were Syrians in the crowds – indeed, I saw buses with Syrian
registration plates that had brought families from Damascus – but
almost all the half million were Lebanese Shias and they wanted to
reject 1559 because it called for Hizbollah to be disarmed. They
were perfectly happy to see the Syrians leave (who now remembers
the Syrian massacre of Hizbollah members in Beirut in 1987?) but,
bearing in mind Syria’s transit of weapons from Iran to Lebanon,
Hizbollah wanted to be regarded as a resistance movement, not a
“militia” to be disarmed. What the Shia were saying was that they
were a power, just as they said when they voted in Iraq. In Lebanon,
Shia Muslims are the largest religious community.

Syria is run by a clique of Alawis – who are Shia – and Iraq is now
dominated by Shia Muslims who voted themselves into power, and Iran
is a Shia nation So when President Bush said “the Lebanese people
have the right to determine their future free from domination of a
foreign power”, the power the Shias were thinking of was not Syria
but the United States and Israel.

And 100 yards away, the demonstrators who have bravely protested
against the murder of Rafik Hariri have become factionalised,
courtesy of the Syrians. At night, the opposition protesters are
largely Christian. Yesterday’s Hizbollah rally, while it contained
the usual pro-Syrian Christians, was essentially Shia. And their
message was not one of thanks to President Bush.

“The fleets came in the past and were defeated; and they will be
defeated again,” Hizbollah’s leader, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, said in
reference to the Americans. Ironically, President Bush was to refer
within hours to the killing of 241 US Marines in Beirut in October
1982, as if their deaths were the responsibility of al-Qa’ida. To the
Israelis, Nasrallah said: “Let go of your dreams for Lebanon. To the
enemy entrenched on our border, occupying our country and imprisoning
our people, ‘There is no place for you here and there is no life for
you among us: Death to Israel’.”

Nasrallah’s take on the 1975-90 Lebanese civil war was predictable.
The crowds were meeting on the front lines that had separated the
Lebanese during the civil war; indeed, on the very location of
the Christian-Muslim trenches of that conflict. “We meet today to
remind the world and our partners in the country,” Nasrallah said,
“that this arena that joins us, or the other one in Martyrs’ Square,
was destroyed by Israel and civil war and was united by Syria and
the blood of its soldiers and officers.”

This was an inventive piece of history. Israel certainly killed many
thousands of Lebanese – more than the Syrians, although their soldiers
took the lives of many hundreds – but the half million roared their
approval.

So what did all this prove? That there was another voice in Lebanon.
That if the Lebanese “opposition” – pro-Hariri and increasingly
Christian – claim to speak for Lebanon and enjoy the support of
President Bush, there is a pro-Syrian, nationalist voice which does not
go along with their anti-Syrian demands but which has identified what
it believes is the true reason for Washington’s support for Lebanon:
Israel’s plans for the Middle East.

The Beirut demonstration yesterday was handled in the usual Hizbollah
way: maximum security, lots of young men in black shirts with two-way
radios, and frightening discipline. No one was allowed to carry a gun
or a Hizbollah flag. There was no violence. When one man brandished a
Syrian flag, it was immediately taken from him. Law and order, not
“terrorism”, was what Hizbollah wished. Syria had spoken. President
Bashar Assad’s sarcastic remark about the Hariri protesters needing a
“zoom lens” to show their numbers had been answered by a demonstration
of Shia power which needed no “zoom”.

And in the mountains above Beirut, still frozen under their winter
snows, few Syrians moved. There were Syrian military trucks on the
international high way to Damascus but no withdrawal, no retreat, no
redeployment. The Taif agreement of 1989 stipulated that the Syrians
should withdraw to the Mdeirej heights above Beirut, which they have
now agreed to do, 14 years later than they should have done.

The official document released by the Lebanese-Syrian military
delegation in Damascus suggests this is a new redeployment and that
in April the Syrian forces, along with their military intelligence
personnel, will withdraw to the Lebanese-Syrian border.

But the question remains: will they retreat to the Syrian side of
the frontier, or sit in the Lebanese-Armenian town of Aanjar, on the
Lebanese side, where Brigadier General Rustum Gazale, the head of
Syrian military intelligence, still maintains his white-painted villa?

Either way, Lebanon can no longer be taken for granted. The “cedar”
revolution now has a larger dimension, one that does not necessarily
favour America’s plans. If the Shia of Iraq can be painted as
defenders of democracy, the Shias of Lebanon cannot be portrayed
as the defenders of “terrorism”. So what does Washington make of
yesterday’s extraordinary events in Beirut?

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Fire breaks out at Russian military base in Armenia

Fire breaks out at Russian military base in Armenia

A1+ web site
10 Mar 05

The emergencies department of Shirak Region has reported that a fire
broke out at the 102nd Russian military base in Armenia on 9 March.
Firemen managed to extinguish the fire which covered about 160 sq.m.

An official’s office was burnt out. The Tsayg TV company has
reported that there are no casualties. The causes of the fire are
being clarified.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Residents Of North Avenue Don’t Want To Remain Homeless

RESIDENTS OF NORTH AVENUE DO NOT WANT TO REMAIN HOMELESS

A1 Plus | 17:50:17 | 10-03-2005 | Social |

“Officials are deaf to all our calls,” the residents of the North
Avenue, who gathered today in front of the government building, say.

They organized a rally again. Their demand remained the same — the
indemnification for damaged flats. Children, old men and women are
driven out of their homes», the demonstrators complained.

None of the government members received the protesters. In the
street however they spoke to deputy Mayor Kamo Areyan, who promised
to arrange a meeting with the head of the department engaged in the
program implementation.

The residents of the North Avenue said that if their problem is
not solved in Armenia they will appeal for help to the Embassies of
foreign states.

–Boundary_(ID_fXmPZTqJb5YI5HVJb/i3OQ)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Getting Real About EthniCity

Creative Loafing Charlotte

CUISINE | CUISINE 03.02.05

Getting Real About EthniCity

Charlotte cuisine covers the globe, but do the locals care?

TRICIA CHILDRESS

Next Generation Consulting, that now-notorious outfit that hired focus
groups of “young professionals” to determine Charlotte’s hipness factor,
noted that one element that would make the Queen City “cool” is to have
“authentic” ethnic restaurants, especially “authentic” ethnic restaurants in
the city core. I’m going to assume for the moment that these “young
professionals” did not mean putting in an Epnic (Disney’s Epcot + ethnic)
restaurant along the lines of a P.F. Chang’s on the Square. I’ll go with the
hopeful premise that what they want are locally grown ethnic restaurants
operating in the downtown environment. The study folk call this a “cultural
amenity,” since eating ethnic is a popular fad for grads.

But just how many ethnic restaurants does Charlotte actually have now? I
asked Bill Hardister of the Mecklenburg County Health Department this
question, since his department inspects all the food operations in the
county. Unfortunately, his office does not stratify restaurants by type or
size. On the MCHD list are 1,758 active food operators. This number takes in
all the fast food franchises, including the 31 McDonald’s and the 46 area
Subways, the deli counters at the Harris Teeters, even the jail.

So although there is no official document with the precise number of ethnic
restaurants, I culled through the list and arrived at approximately 300-plus
locally owned and operated ethnic restaurants. I did not include the
hundreds of Italian restaurants and pizzerias, local burrito-type chains
such as Salsaritas, regional burrito chains such as Southwest Moe’s, or
locally grown gyro shops such as Showmars. Nor does this list include the
growing number of ethnic bakeries or food markets. I tried to keep the list
to actual ethnic eateries. In many cases, I made the distinction of ethnic
from non-ethnic by calling the establishment and asking the owner if he, or
she, considered the restaurant to be ethnic. Some non-ethnic eateries are
owned by folks who have very ethnic sounding names.

I went further to break these 300-plus eateries into ethnic groups. The
largest turned out to be the 110 area Chinese food vendors. Not all of these
spots are restaurants. Some are take-out-only places while others are large,
full-scale restaurants such as Wan Fu, Dragon Court, Shun Lee Palace and
Baoding.

The next largest ethnic eatery group was Latino. In this category were about
90 Latino spots: 70 from Mexico, three from South America, four from El
Salvador, and about 10 from the Caribbean islands of Jamaica, the Dominican
Republic, Granada and Cuba.

Next are the “other” (non-Chinese) Asian spots. This list includes over 30
Japanese eateries, a few sushi-only places; 12 Vietnamese restaurants (one
is a soup shop); 12 Thai restaurants; 11 Indian (two of these are south
Indian vegetarian); two Korean (one of these is a small Japanese/Korean take
out, while the other, Koryo, has been operating in Charlotte for 15 years);
one Malaysian; and one Laotian.

Charlotte has four Middle Eastern eateries and one Persian restaurant (in
addition to the Kabob House, Ali Baba take-out says it serves Persian, too).
Two spots serve New Zealand cuisine and two serve African (non-Middle
Eastern) cuisine. Of these, one serves Ethiopian exclusively, while the
other serves Ethiopian and Eritrean. Regrettably, the West Africa
restaurant, Katchikally, closed last year.

In addition to the plethora of Italian places ~W and Italian-American places
~W Charlotte is host to a handful of eateries from Europe, including France,
Spain, England, Ireland and Germany. (If I’ve left out your restaurant,
please call me: 704-522-8334, ext 136.)

Surprising, though, is the lack of a Russian or Eastern European style
restaurant, given the burgeoning number of ex-pats from the former USSR and
Yugoslavia who now call Charlotte home. There are a few ethnic markets: two
Russian, one Russian/Armenian/Eastern European, and one Bosnian market.

But are these ethnic restaurants genuinely authentic? In a brief Spanish
survey given to a random sampling of Latino eateries, I asked if the owner
considered his restaurant’s dishes authentic. The answer was unanimously
yes. All but one owner came from the same country as the food served, and
all agreed that the specialties of the house could be ordered at a
restaurant in their native country.

More interesting was the answer to the percentage of clients who were US
citizens. Not one of these restaurateurs indicated that the “Charlottean”
customers amounted to more than 40 percent. In fact, at a majority of
places, the number was closer to five to 10 percent.

When asked why Charlotteans have the perception that there’s a dearth of
authentic restaurants in town, the owners looked perplexed. Here I was
speaking Spanish on a street with dozens of similar establishments. Most
owners just burst out laughing. Some tried to help by indicating that
Charlotteans might not know these restaurants exist (after all, the focus
group didn’t). Others said that Charlotteans may be uninformed about the
various Latino cuisines. One Caribbean restaurateur, visibly annoyed, noted
non-Latinos thought all Latino food was the same: Tex-Mex. “I do not serve
burritos here,” she said, shaking her head.

But then these Latino restaurateurs were quick to tell me that their
restaurants had specialties not found elsewhere in the city: the cut of
meat, or imported ingredients.

Toi (Sukanya) B. Rogers, a native of Bangkok, owns Thai Marlai in Cornelius.
She moved to Charlotte with her American husband in 1972. In the 1980s, she
opened the phenomenally popular Thai Cuisine. Then in the 1990s, she opened
Thai Orchid. Does Rogers consider her Thai Marlai an authentic Thai
restaurant? She responded wryly, “I am 100 percent Thai. My sister who is
cooking in the kitchen is 100 percent Thai. We get our seasonings, our
chilies and many other ingredients from Thailand, and the recipes are my
family’s. And they are 100 percent Thai, too. If someone does not think this
place is an authentic Thai restaurant, they should come talk to me.”

Many restaurateurs agree with Rogers. Nader Behrouzjou opened North
Carolina’s only Iranian (Persian) restaurant seven years ago. He said, “My
dishes at the Kabob House are all Iranian dishes. People tell me I should
convert some of the recipes, to Americanize them. But my culture is 2,500
years old. I serve the authentic kebob marinated with different spices.”

Alex Ayalew, a native of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, opened Meskerem Ethiopian
Cuisine last year. He reports, “Our food is authentic. It is exactly the
same as the food in Ethiopia. We get all the spices from back home. The
taste is the same.” He said it is just as important for him to educate his
customers about his culture as to serve them delicious food, and he hopes
that more Charlotteans will visit his restaurant, which is less than one
mile from Trade and Tryon. “We try to market to everyone. Once they try it,
they come back.”

In Pineville, Gitta and Tom Maier opened the Waldhorn Restaurant six years
ago. The restaurant is named for her parents’ restaurant in Stuttgart and
her husband is a Culinary Institute of America graduate whose father is a
German baker. Gitta Maier said, “We are definitely authentic. Our customers
rave about the food and say it reminds them of Germany. Two-thirds of our
customers are American, the rest are Germans who live here.”

But the truth is that although some restaurants such as those mentioned
above remain true to their heritage, others do not. As the clientele grows
to include more Americans, a funny thing happens to the menu. It is a common
practice, for example, for Chinese restaurants to have two menus. One is for
Asians and the other for non-Asians. On the latter are such Americanized
Chinese dishes as Chicken Chow Mein, Chop Suey and, more recently, Crab
Rangoon. And no, there isn’t cream cheese in traditional Chinese cuisine.

Why two menus? Tony Koos, owner of Dragon Court Chinese Restaurant in the
Asian Corners Marketplace, puts both of his menus in the same folder ~W that
way Asians and Americans alike can choose. He stated, “We have the two
menus, the regular Chinese and authentic Chinese. Both types use the real
Chinese vegetables. What is different is the cooking style. The authentic
style is totally different.”

But serving authentic can be challenging for the restaurateur who wants to
hear that cash register ring. Would an American choose black chicken feet
stir fry at a Chinese restaurant?

The change in dishes may be subtle. Kevin Cheng, who serves extraordinary
Taiwanese cuisine at Tomi, related, “We have one dish that we had to change.
The dish called for a chicken leg cut up with the bone and the skin. First,
Americans don’t like dark meat. Next, they don’t like the bones, and third,
they don’t eat skin, so we use boneless chicken breast as the meat for this
dish. But all the other ingredients and the sauce are the same.”

Some restaurateurs opt out of the whole authentic arena altogether. At
Salsas, Sergio Gomes said their restaurant’s concept is “American Mexican.”
“We considered both directions and went with this concept. While we have
authentic Mexican choices on the menu, we primarily have Tex-Mex. But
everything is made fresh in house. We try to reach as many people as we can,
so the dishes are not too spicy. About 70 percent of our clients are
Americans; the rest is Latino, but that segment is increasing.”

But what happens to the other ethnic restaurants if one within a category
acquiesces to American taste buds? Bhupen Engineer, owner of Bombay Cuisine,
noted that having high quality Indian restaurants is important to him. He
opined, “Many people will judge all Indian restaurants from one Indian
restaurant. If they do not have a good experience at my competitor’s place,
then I will lose a future customer.”

So if ethnic restaurants have only one menu for all patrons and the food is
“authentic,” do the non-ethnic customers take advantage of the experience?
Most restaurateurs told me that Americans typically order the same dish
repeatedly. Cheng said some customers come into Tomi, realize he doesn’t
serve Americanized Chinese food like chow mein, and leave.

Cuong Duong, owner of Bên Thành Vietnamese Restaurant, reported, “Americans
eat the same thing again and again. I have one customer for the past 10
years and only sometimes does he order something new. It’s always the same.”
Duong also noted that what the Vietnamese come for at lunch is not the same
that non-Vietnamese come for at dinner. “The Vietnamese come in for our Bun
Bo Hue, a spicy lemongrass and rice noodle soup; banh canh, a shrimp and
rice noodle soup; pho soup with meatballs; and a seafood soup. Americans
order the curry, spring rolls, charbroiled meats with sweet sour sauce, and
stir fried tofu and pan fried rice noodle.”

How many is the right number of ethnic restaurants? Out of Charlotte’s
300-plus ethnic restaurants, there are 17 ~W from upscale fine dining to take
out ~W in the center city (within 277): Bistro 100 (French), ARPA (Spanish),
Latorre’s (Latino), Blue (Mediterranean), Luce, Coco Osteria (Italian), SoHo
Bistro, China Inn, China King, China Queen, The Wok, Curry House, Open
Kitchen (Southern Italian), Sushi, Tin Tin, Fuse Box and Fujos. Notably,
this group does not include a number of ethnic restaurants within one mile
from Trade and Tryon, including the exceptional Cuisine Malaya.

While ethnic restaurants may be the culture that the “young professional”
study group yearns for, the fact is I am unaware of any of our current
ethnic restaurants having a lengthy wait at dinner. Not downtown, not on
South Boulevard, North Tryon nor Central. So why come downtown?

Mao Lin, who owns SoHo Bistro in the Hearst building, came downtown because
his family desired to offer more “cosmopolitan” food. Lin had had
restaurants in Fayetteville and a small takeout Chinese restaurant in
Harrisburg.

Other area entrepreneurs have looked into going downtown. Engineer said when
the Indian population grows to about 10,000, a “fine dining” Indian
restaurant could make it downtown. However, a vegetarian South Indian
restaurant could never survive the high rent, reported Narayan Mogera, the
owner of the Woodlands South Indian Vegetarian Restaurant. “I do not serve
meat, nor do I serve alcohol. With the cost of the lease, we could not make
money downtown without selling meat or alcohol. Typically Southern Indian
restaurants, such as Woodlands, are vegetarian. Entrée dishes do not cost
that much.”

Mark Shen, owner of the Emperor Chinese Restaurant that’s within a mile of
Trade and Tryon but outside the 277 loop ~W and, thus, the study group’s
knowledge ~W noted that he has looked into going downtown, but the
ventilation requirements have dissuaded him. “Typically, the hood costs
about $15,000 to $25,000. That’s the common type you would put in here (in a
strip shopping center). Downtown, there are many environmental concerns,
especially if you are operating on the street level of a condominium
complex.” He continues, “Those hoods are very expensive. They muffle the
sound and change the grease output. They cost $75,000 to $100,000.” That
additional $75,000 for just the hood system means the entrepreneur needs to
have ever deeper pockets.

Another factor which is discouraging to entrepreneurs is the high cost of
downtown space. Rogers, who has looked into opening there, said, “Most
places cost about $10,000 a month for rent, plus a percentage.” That’s
$120,000 up a year ~W or, in a restaurateur’s language, the typical
restaurant would have to have sales of over $1.2 million just to break even.
That’s a lot of Pad Thai.

Would Charlotteans fork out $25 for a Pad Thai or Chicken Tikki Masala
entree? The owners I spoke with thought Charlotteans are not ready to spend
that kind of money at an ethnic restaurant. Besides, Charlotte needs to
welcome a larger ethnic community in order to support these additional
restaurants, and Charlotte is not known for that kind of inclusive
hospitality.

How far are the other 300 ethnic restaurants from center city? Ironically, a
large percentage of these restaurants are within 10 minutes from Trade and
Tryon. The 4900 Block of Central Avenue, which is 5.1 miles (or nine
minutes) from the Square, has the following to offer: one Thai restaurant,
two Vietnamese, one Mexican/Honduran, one Caribbean, one Salvadorean, one
Middle Eastern, one Salvadorean bakery, two Middle Eastern markets, and a
Vietnamese billiards/bar.

For now, most of Charlotte’s authentic ethnic restaurants are located in
ethnic neighborhoods, since their main customer base is ethnic. But what
about the brave souls who have staked out an ethnic position in the
netherworld of restaurants, places like Ballantyne? A few years back, Be
Pham and Axel Dikkers opened the remarkable Saigon Café. She had been the
owner of many successful Vietnamese restaurants in town; he had once owned
the French Pastis in SouthEnd. Not only was the rent high in Ballantyne, but
the folks who went to Saigon Café didn’t like the interactiveness of the
food. Dikkers told me, “I think the people didn’t want to do things with
their hands. They wanted me ~W the chef ~W to do it all for them.”

And ethnic owners are no different from Charlotte’s other independent
operators who are besieged by the increasing invasion of chain restaurants.
But the ethnic owners’ true competitor is the Epnic restaurant, since many
Americans find it so much easier to eat in a “kinda authentic” ethnic place.

While today’s customer is much savvier about food and is interested in
ethnic cuisines, will this same customer support the ethnic restaurants if
they move into non-ethnic neighborhoods, or if they move downtown? Remember
Tango Argentino? Siboney Cuban? Inka Grille? Pastis? Closed. Closed. Closed.
Closed.

The very cool aspect to getting our groove back, or getting it for the first
time, is that Charlotte can actually buy its way to being cool. Charlotteans
are very good at spending money. Instead of buying the McMansion, perhaps a
few dollars could be spared to try all the ethnic eateries in the city. In
fact, if you visited one of the 300-plus ethnic restaurants currently open
each week, it would take six years to visit all of them. Plus, during that
time, more independent restaurants would open ~W maybe even a Dutch
Indonesian place. In any case, the ultimate benefit is not “coolness.” The
ultimate benefit is that Charlotte might develop a culinary soul.

–Boundary_(ID_W/d6BdATJCb/VM46zx5xfw)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Educational Center Of Technologies Of American Company NationalInstr

EDUCATIONAL CENTER OF TECHNOLOGIES OF AMERICAN COMPANY NATIONAL
INSTRUMENTS OPENS AT SEUA IN YEREVAN

YEREVAN, MARCH 9, ARMINFO. An Educational Center of an American company
National Instruments opened at State Engineering University of Armenia
(SEUA) on March 7. National instruments is one of the leading companies
in the world in the sphere of development and production of hardware
and software for automation of dimensions, diagnostics, management,
design.

Speaking at the ceremony, Director on National Instruments Development
Aram Salatyan said that company produced an intensive program of
support to higher education in the world, contributing to creation
and modernization of educational courses, laboratories, educational
and research complexes. He pointed out lack of laboratory examination
works in the world. In this connection, the company organizes tenders
to resume these works. In the current year the above university won
a tender, which resulted in opening of a laboratory in the country
and provision of Lab.View software to the university and necessary
equipment for examination works. “Such laboratories exist only in
Russia and the opening of a similar one in Armenia testifies to the
high potential of Armenian specialists in the sphere,” Salatyan said.

According to the educational plan, teachers, students and specialists
of industrial enterprises will receive education at the Center. The
graphics of LabVIEW development will become a subject of study, which
allows collection of data, automation of dimensions and management of
processes through PC. It is for already two years that teachers of SEUA
have studied the software of LavVIEW package. At present, the package
will be technically replenished and will become a subject for study
of students with a broad spectrum of technical specialties. Besides,
a scientific and technical seminar “Virtual devices – revolution
concept of automating dimensions and management” was held. At the
presentation of the seminar, Director on NI Development Aram Salatyan
made a report. Participating in the seminar were representatives
of SEUA, Yerevan State University, AUA, European Academy, National
Academy of Sciences, the leading National Research Institutions and
industrial enterprises of Armenia.

It should be noted that every year the best educational establishments
of 50 countries in the world participate in a contest for grants of
National Instruments. This year, one of the winners was SEUA. National
Instruments provides SEUA with necessary funds for implementation
of educational process as well as with a full package of software,
laboratory stations and others.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress