March with torches becomes a pan-Armenian tradition

March with torches becomes a pan-Armenian tradition
By Naira Poghossian

Yerkir/arm
25 March 05

There are some issues that should unite the young people irrespective
of their political affiliation and sphere of activities. This are the
issues of Artsakh, the international recognition of the Armenian
Genocide and the struggle against various disastrous phenomena inside
the country such as poverty and corruption.

This is the firm belief of Zinavor Meghrian, representative of the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation’s (ARF) Youth Union. `There are
several issues of country-wide importance that should unite young
people irrespective of their being pro-governmental or pro-opposition.
One of such issues is the series of events organized to commemorate
the 90th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

Our Union started the series with an open letter to the European
Union’s office in Armenia. In this letter we appeal to the EU
countries to recognize the Armenian Genocide,’ Meghrian said noting
that the most impressive act of unification will take place in the
evening of April 23 when a march with torches will move to
Tsitsernakaberd.

Meghrian says the march with torches has been organized for four years
and has been the initiative of ARF’s Youth Union. This year the
initiative will be of pan-Armenian nature since young people from
other youth organizations and unions as well as young people from the
Diaspora will participate in the march.

`The fact that this time the march will be pan-Armenian testifies that
our efforts of the past four years have had results. By limiting
ourselves to ARF’s Youth Union only, we will not be able to accomplish
many things.

We have to unite our efforts with others. The 90th anniversary of the
Armenian Genocide is a good incentive for the young people of Armenia
to start a unified march,’ Meghrian says.

He believes there are many young people in Armenia and in the Diaspora
who are united around one common idea and they can show to the entire
world that they are there to pursue their rights and that they are
united in the pursuit of international recognition of the Armenian
Genocide.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Kyrgyz “crisis” delays war game – Russian military

Kyrgyz “crisis” delays war game – Russian military

Interfax news agency
28 Mar 05

Moscow, 28 March: The Rubezh-2005 command post exercise of the
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) has been postponed, the
Russian Defence Ministry told Interfax today.

“In the light of the political crisis in Kyrgyzstan, a CSTO member,
the joint exercise Rubezh-2005 has been postponed. The members will
decide on a new date for the drill,” an official told Interfax.

The joint exercise had been planned for the period 1-6 April on the
territory of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

The members of the CSTO are Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan,
Tajikistan and Russia.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Speech of Aliyev at 3rd Congress of Yeni Azerbaijan Party

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
March 28 2005

SPEECH OF PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AZERBAIJAN, CHAIRMAN OF YENI
AZERBAIJAN PARTY ILHAM ALIYEV AT III CONGRESS OF THE PARTY
[March 26, 2005, 22:50:52]

Dear Ladies and gentlemen!

Dear Congress participants!

I would like to extend to all of you my cordial greetings and best
wishes for your good health and every success. I am grateful to you
for the kind words about me. The III Congress of the Yeni Azerbaijan
Party is a very important event in socio-political life of our
country. I believe its resolutions will play a key role in further
democratic development of Azerbaijan.

The Yeni Azerbaijan Party was founded under severe conditions in
1992. Initiated by our national leader Heydar Aliyev, the Yeni
Azerbaijan Party was founded as an opposition party. Unlike some
members of the today~Rs opposition, however, the Yeni Azerbaijan Party
has never been in opposition to Azerbaijan~Rs statehood or national
interests. Not only we but also the whole Azerbaijani people used to
be in opposition to the country~Rs leadership of that as their
destructive policy had led to anarchy, chaos and total crisis. They
had brought the country to the brink of a precipice. The processes
taking place in the country at that time questioned the very future
of Azerbaijan; the country was on the verge of separation. It was
wisdom of the Azerbaijani people and national leader Heydar Aliyev~Rs
political experience, knowledge and courage that allowed our country
to get out of that critical situation, saved the country from all
existing threats.

Our country started to advance with confidence, and having
strengthened its political and economic potential for a short period
of time, has turned into a leading state in the region.

If our people~Rs national leader Heydar Aliyev had not come to power
in that hard moment, now it~Rs hard to imagine what kind of troubles
Azerbaijan would face with then.

With our national leader Heydar Aliyev~Rs coming to power in
Azerbaijan, a new era of development has begun in our country. The
first years of this era were also very difficult: stability was not
established in full measure, and consequences of the civil war were
not eliminated in the country. Population~Rs welfare was getting worse
form year to year; the country~Rs economy was in breaking point. And
again, it was efforts by Heydar Aliyev, his far-seeing policy that
allowed the country to eliminate negative factors and take the path
of progress. Irrespective of political system, Heydar Aliyev had
always been a leader of the Azerbaijani people, in the true sense of
the word. His activities while running the country in 1970-1982 were
aimed at meeting the interests of the Azerbaijani people. It was a
result of his services that large amount of funds were brought to
Azerbaijan from the center: new plants and factories were built.
Today, these plants and factories provide considerable support to
Azerbaijan~Rs economic and industrial potential. If the large
industrial infrastructure were not created then in Azerbaijan,
especially in oil sector, the country~Rs economic potential would not
be so huge today. As a result of the work done, Azerbaijan is now
enhancing its political and economic potential. The work done in the
country from 1993 to 2003 has turned Azerbaijan into a truly
independent state. Independence is not just a state~Rs attribute.
There are some countries, which have all state~Rs attributes, and have
joined the international community just formally. Their policy,
however, is far from being really independent. One of our nation~Rs
wealth is that today, Azerbaijan and its leadership is pursuing
completely independent policy. This policy is serving only national
interests of the Azerbaijani people.

The implementation of the Heydar Aliyev~Rs oil strategy has led to
attraction of billions of dollars of foreign investments in
Azerbaijan. I repeat, if the Contract of the Century were not signed
in 1994, the subsequent infrastructure projects were not realized and
the construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline were not
started, the today~Rs economic development in Azerbaijan would be out
of question.

The signing of the Contract of the Century triggered the development
of a number if sectors in Azerbaijan. This contract gave a powerful
impetus to overall economic growth in the country.

Today, Azerbaijan~Rs currency reserves make up 2 billion dollars. This
is the wealth we use to protect national interests of the Azerbaijani
people and make our state more powerful.

Huge work has been done towards army building, as well. The today~Rs
Azerbaijani army is capable of solving any task if needed. We are
taking necessary measures to reinforce our army, and will do so in
the future.

Azerbaijan has managed to break the information blockade. Azerbaijan
has joined the international family, and managed to take its worthy
place in the international arena. Today, Azerbaijan holds strong
positions in the region, and is able to impact on the processes
taking place in the region. I think we use effectively these
possibilities, enhancing Azerbaijan~Rs international prestige day by
day. I believe our international activities, foreign policy play an
important role in protection of our national interests.

I have to say that 2003 was a decisive year in the modern history of
Azerbaijan. The health problems our national leader Heydar Aliyev
experienced did not allow him to join the presidential elections.
Supported by the people of Azerbaijan and the Yeni Azerbaijan Party,
I was nominated for the election. And you all are aware of my
pre-election campaign statements. I said then, and I want to repeat
it now, that Azerbaijan must follow the Heydar Aliyev~Rs path, the
only one that can lead us to success.

Heydar Aliyev~Rs policy must be continued. This is a demand of the
present. This is the only policy that will make Azerbaijan stronger,
and serve the improvement of the Azerbaijani people~Rs living
standard. I am very glad that the people of Azerbaijan made a right
choice in 2003 voting for the Heydar Aliyev~Rs policy.

In 2003, the people of Azerbaijan experienced a great loss. We lost
our leader. That was a great shock and tragedy to all of us. At this
hard moment, however, the people of Azerbaijan came together and
demonstrated its will and devotion to the Heydar Aliyev~Rs policy, his
ideology and philosophy.

I also rest on the people~Rs support in my activities. I can feel this
support, and this support gives me strength. People~Rs trust, support
and appreciation are the most important factors for any leader. I
keep the promises I made during my pre-election campaign with respect
to domestic, foreign and economic policy, and all other spheres. Over
the past period, Azerbaijan has made considerable progress in all
fields. Our foreign policy is pursued within the framework of the
deliberate and purposeful conception. This conception has several
directions. One of them is establishment of sincere relations with
neighbors. Some results have been gained in this regard. Azerbaijan
has established very warm relations with his neighbors. Our neighbors
support territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, and approach the
Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh through the prism
of international legal norms only.

Azerbaijan is actively involved in regional cooperation, and there is
a graphic evidence of this: the largest regional Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil pipeline project is being realized at the initiative and active
participation of Azerbaijan. Our policy towards integration into the
European and Euroatlantic structures are successfully continued. To
date, Azerbaijan has joined the European Union~Rs New Neighborhood
Policy, has been working in cooperation with NATO in the framework of
the Individual Partnership Plan of Actions. Azerbaijan~Rs position has
been strengthened in the United Nations, Council of Europe,
Organization of Islamic Conference and other international
organizations. The work done, and the adopted resolutions, in
particular, the political decisions concerning the Armenia-Azerbaijan
conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh demonstrate that our activities in
this direction were very successful.

All we have done within the country serve safeguarding of the
existing stability. Stability is the basic condition to any country
to ensure its progress. Where there is no stability, progress is out
of question. Where there is no stability, attraction of foreign
investments is impossible. Where there is no stability, distrust
arouses in people. That~Rs why our national leader stated more than
once – and we are devoted to this policy – that successful and
all-round development of Azerbaijan requires maintenance and
strengthening of stability. Those who want to break this stability
will meet with an adequate rebuff. Such attempts would take place
before. Such attempts took place following the presidential elections
in 2003, and they all were suppressed. I hope that was a good lesson
for the forces that had made these attempts. If they resort to that
again, they will get the same. We use words and politics in our
political struggle, not stones and sticks.

It is my regret that opposition does not accept our repeated calls
for a dialogue. Such proposals were advanced more than once both
before and after the elections. But what we could see was that those
in the opposition camp inclined to dialogue were expelled from the
parties. This shows clearly that these forces do not want to
dialogue. In this case, we have to consider other ways. Anyway, I
believe only civilized political relations can ensure normal and
democratic development in our country.

Azerbaijan continues to advance successfully. All the pre-election
promises are kept. We promised to continue economic reforms, and we
are doing so. On one hand structural reforms are being realized, on
the other hand, the adopted programs of socio-economic development of
regions are now being successfully implemented. We promised we would
create 600 thousand jobs, and the number of those already created
exceeded 170 thousand in just a year. We promised to help
entrepreneurs. The amount of funds set aside to assist business has
been doubled in the 2005 state budget. We promised an increase in our
budget. As a result of the, first of all, financial discipline, the
2005 budget has increased by some 25-30%.

Non-oil sector began to develop rapidly. Development of the non-oil
sector is a very important factor for our future activities. I am
very glad that the consolidating class of entrepreneurs in Azerbaijan
uses successfully all these opportunities.

Our links with youth have always been at a high level, I personally
have always communicated with youth, and now keep in touch. It gives
me pleasure that overwhelming majority of those joined our party
after the II Congress is youth. This is natural, because young people
are very well aware of the processes taking place within the country,
and around the world. They see that the today~Rs leadership of
Azerbaijan is pursuing its policy adequately to the processes taking
place in the world as this meets our national interests. Our national
interest is creation of democratic and civilized state in Azerbaijan.

We are a country rich in natural resources. We have huge potential,
human resources. But we also know that only a democratic society
enable every citizen to freely express his wish and realize its
potential. It is only democratic development that can lead the
country to progress. This is why all our steps are taken in this
direction. Both enhancing of our economic potential, very serious
measures in army building, maintenance and strengthening of political
stability in Azerbaijan and further democratization of our country
are priority directions of our policy.

Our country has great prospects. I don~Rt think Azerbaijan will face
serious problems in the future. All the problems will be solved
including social ones. We have doubled the minimum wage, and will
raise it in future. We will raise pensions. Population~Rs incomes rise
from year to year. The reforms implemented in the country create new
opportunities. The work to be carried out in agriculture will allow
to develop this sector; up-to-date equipment will be acquired.

Commissioning of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline will bring huge
funds to the country creating favorable conditions for development of
all sectors of the economy. This will increase social protection
possibilities, and improve living standard of our refugees and
internally displace persons, the most needy members of our society.
As you know, creation of a new infrastructure, construction of
settlements, schools and hospitals are in progress. In other word,
neither in the near nor in the distant future I can see the problems
Azerbaijan could have come across, as, I repeat, our present and
expected activities, the governmental programs will allow us to cope
with the tasks set.

The only and the most difficult problem is the Armenia-Azerbaijan
conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. We are striving for its settlement.
But, of course, this question does not depend on the wish of one
side. In this regard, we are doing everything in our power too. On
one hand, this is our purposeful foreign policy, one might say, a
quite serious offensive, international organizations~R more careful
approach to the issue, diplomatic efforts, on the other hand, army
building – it is no secret that the 2005 budget~Rs army expenditures
have increased by more than 30%, and will be increased more in
future, as well as Azerbaijan~Rs prestige in the region, realization
of the regional projects, construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil
pipeline, i.e. these factors give us considerable advantage. The
tendencies that can be observed now in the negotiation process are in
our favor. This is the reality. Just destructive position of Armenia
is what hampers the problem~Rs solution.

The international law norms are on our side. Economic potential is on
our side. Military potential is on our side. Justice is in on our
side. The people of Azerbaijan will never put up with the lost of
their lands. The people will liberate their native lands at all
costs. We want to solve the problem in peaceful way. We don~Rt want
war, we have great plans and good prospects. We want to be engaged in
constructive work and make further progress in our country. Everybody
realizes, however, that the uncertain situation cannot be endless.
The current talks are held within the framework of the Prague
process. On the whole, the Prague process has led to a new situation,
that means, as a matter of fact, a step-by-step resolution. So, we
hope a mutually acceptable solution meeting all the international law
norms will be found as a result of the Prague process. However, if
the negotiations are unsuccessful again, then further talks will be
senseless at all, because, as you know, they lasted over ten years.
All possible ways have already been discussed. In this case,
Azerbaijan will have to make serious changes in its strategic course,
and political approach to this problem.

Dear friends!

The year 2005 will be extremely important for our country. In all,
2005 began well: all our plans concerning economic development are
being realized. In 2005, Azerbaijan advances new international
initiatives. The country strengthens its bilateral relations with
various countries, enhances its regional cooperation. In 2005, the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline will be put into operation thus
completely changing the situation. On one hand, this will have a
strong impact on the regional processes; on the other hand, oil from
other countries will be delivered through this pipeline to the world
markets. Commissioning of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline will
enhance the role of Azerbaijan in the region, and allow us, in just
three years, to double, quadruple and even quintuple our export
potential. This of course will bring huge revenues to our country
that will serve improvement of the living standards of the
Azerbaijani people. The funds accumulated to date in the State Oil
Fund are managed transparently. The people are kept informed about
it, all data are made publicly available, and all the expenditures
are carried out through the centralized budget. All these issues are
debated in the parliament. I mean the people of Azerbaijan through
their representatives in the parliament are directly involved in
distribution of the Oil Fund~Rs revenues. This is very important as we
are talking about our common property. This is the property of the
Azerbaijani people that every citizen should take an advantage of. At
the same time, every citizen must have knowledge of what the
collected funds are spent on.

Parliamentary elections are expected in 2005. We attach a great
significance to these elections. We believe these elections will play
a key role in the further democratic development of Azerbaijan. I
make no doubt that the elections will be absolutely fair and
transparent, and that they will become a reflection of the
Azerbaijani people~Rs will and wishes.

The Yeni Azerbaijan Party also should prepare for the elections, and
we shall do it. Although we cannot see a rival in the today~Rs
political arena, we should confess that the opposition – maybe we
shouldn~Rt have talk about it now – is in a very sorry plight. The
barbarian actions they perpetrated after the presidential elections
have destroyed the ruins of their no longer existing foundations.
Today, the presence of the opposition in the Azerbaijan~Rs political
scene is not felt at all. They only tours abroad at the invitation of
certain international organizations, meet here with minor officials,
and come back to Azerbaijan inspired with promising plans and ideas.
But after a while, we all make sure it counts for nothing. In other
word, the Yeni Azerbaijan Party has no a rival. I am sorry about it.
I consider such a situation in our society as abnormal. We, the Yeni
Azerbaijan Party, are able to impact upon socio-political processes
taking place in the country. The people of Azerbaijan support our
policy. Our policy is a practical work, practical steps, and real
issues. We are far from populism, do not give interviews ten times
per day, but we are busy.

I stated before the elections that if elected I would worthily serve
my people. I am trying to do so, and will do my best for the people
of Azerbaijan to live better and better every day, for our country to
consolidate, enrich and turn into a powerful state.

Dear friends!

I am sure that staying devoted to the Heydar Aliyev~Rs political
course, we will worthily and attachedly serve our Homeland and
people.

Long live the Yeni Azerbaijan Party!

Long live the modern, independence Republic of Azerbaijan – the
creation of Heydar Aliyev!

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Dubai: Melkonian Educational Institute at Crossroads

Melkonian Educational Institute at Crossroads

Azad-Hye, United Arab Emirates
March 27 2005

On Sunday 20th March 2004 Azad-Hye visited the Melkonian Educational
Institute in Nicsoa (Cyprus), which is under the threat of closure
at the end of this academic year (see photo gallery).

About 120 students (mainly from Cyprus, Armenia, Iran and other
countries) are attending the lessons, almost certain that they will
need to find other places to continue their studies next year. Some
are lucky enough to be at the graduation year, but others need
to do arrangements for smooth transition to other schools, without
excluding the prospect of discontinuing their studies due to financial
difficulties.

The feeling of lose is predominant among the students. No new students
were admitted in at the beginning of the current school year. The
current students and thousand of graduates will soon be deprived
of their beloved school. It is not certain whether their collective
effort will change the course of events.

We met several citizens of Cyprus, who all expressed their concern
about the fate of the school, marking it as a sad day for all
Cypriots. Actually it is incomprehensive why AGBU insists to close
a school that can grant its graduates high school certificates,
recognized on the European Union level, now that Cyprus has joined
the Union.

The premises of the Institute, especially the main two buildings are
part of Nicosia’s architectural heritage. Together with the surrounding
parks they are chief landmarks in the capital city.

Two of Melkonian’s students approached and provided us with a written
text about the closure of their school. They signed the text with the
nicknames Ardziv and Paze. Here are the main parts of what they wrote
(translated from Armenian to English):

“The Fall of 79 years old school: For many years the Melkonian
Educational Institute has played an irreplaceable role in the
Armenian Diaspora cultural life. As a unique educational center,
it has provided numerous pupils with the necessary means for their
educational progress and development.

Only indifferent people and those who are totally overwhelmed with
financial considerations could take the decision for its closure.
Their excuses about the big financial loses of the Institute are
baseless, as, from its first day this school was a product of
benevolence and kindness, not a mean for business profit.

The suggestion of opening Melkonian Institute in Armenia is completely
ridiculous, because there are enough schools in Armenia to cover the
needs for national education there.

In the past, foreign invaders had ordered the closure of our schools,
but what we see today the Armenian hands are doing it, as if it
is not enough the closure of the other Diaspora schools such as
Murad-Raphaelian, etc.

In our opinion the closure of the school will have tragic consequences
on the Diaspora cultural life. It will endanger the struggle for
keeping our identity in the Middle East and Europe. This is why we all
consider the day that the decision for the closure of the school was
taken (16th March) as a black day in our history. We will continue
to protest and oppose to those who prefer to see the doors of the
Melkonian Institute closed forever.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

It came from beneath the earth: photojournalist captures Big Dig

The Boston Globe
March 20, 2005, Sunday THIRD EDITION

IT CAME FROM BENEATH THE EARTH
PHOTOJOURNALIST CAPTURES BIG DIG

by By Ron Fletcher, Globe Correspondent

Camouflage no longer defines Michael Hintlian’s wardrobe. The
photojournalist’s predawn groping for a pair of duck bib overalls,
safety vest, and hard hat has ended. Four thousand rolls of film
later, his attire differs once again from that of the Big Dig workers
whom he spent seven years chronicling unofficially. Morning musings
now revolve around ideas other than how to slip unnoticed into a crew
of ironworkers or piledrivers.

These days, when he returns to the sites and sights he visited
thrice-weekly, it’s in the humdrum role of commuter.

“I’ll still take a few shots of the project from my car
window as I’m driving through town,” said Hintlian. “Even though the
bulk of the work is done, there are still some interesting things
going on. I can’t quite accept that my work there is over. It’s like
Frankenstein’s obsession, but one I certainly don’t regret.”

>>From 5,000 prints, Hintlian has culled 65 black-and-white shots that
capture the trials and triumphs of the country’s largest public works
project. They appear in the recently published book “Digging: The
Workers of Boston’s Big Dig.” In images that convey the menace and
promise of iron, steel, and concrete, Hintlian has highlighted the
faces, arms, hands, and torsos of some of the Dig’s 5,000 workers. In
them, you glimpse the living that takes place between the taxing
shifts.

“My core interest was exploring where work and worker meet,” said
Hintlian. He recalled the very first shot he took, an image that did
not make it into the book but remains a personal favorite.

“It was early in the project, back in 1997,” said Hintlian. “This
group of ironworkers were doing some preliminary work, rigging a huge
beam. I caught this image of their arms just their arms coming into
contact with the wire cable and the steel column. That dazzled me.
That opened the door.”

Hintlian’s previous work focused on the plight of Armenians after the
dissolution of the Soviet Union. With the Big Dig project, which
initially seemed like a welcome distraction from the grief and
struggle throughout his grandfather’s post-genocide homeland,
Hintlian unearthed some common denominators and evolved as a
photographer.

“Photographers often struggle with the classification of their work:
Is it art? Is it journalism? Is it lasting or fleeting?” said
Hintlian, 56.

“I’ve begun to see my work more in terms of history,” he said. “I
hope and trust that I’m putting together a body of work that in 50 or
100 years will add to our understanding of what happened in a
particular place at a particular time to particular people, whether
it’s Armenia or downtown Boston.”

A full-time photojournalist, Hintlian remains well aware of the
momentous events he missed during his subterranean days in Boston. “I
would have gone to Afghanistan and Iraq,” said Hintlian, “but I was
too deep into this project. Also . . . I was finding a voice and
direction I’d been looking for as a photographer. I was learning not
to let my conscious mind get in the way. . . . I can’t wait to return
to Armenia with this new approach to what I do.”

Though Hintlian now drives through the city in civilian clothing,
he recalls fondly his days among the hard-hatted workers.

“I had this, well, tool that weighed 19 ounces, while they handled
tons of steel,” said Hintlian. “Still, we were both there to build
something, bolt by bolt or image by image.”

Michael Hintlian will discuss his Big Dig photographs at the Old
South Meeting House at 310 Washington St. Wednesday at 6:30 p.m.
Admission is free.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Thousands Mark Easter Sunday in Jerusalem

Thousands Mark Easter Sunday in Jerusalem
By KRISTEN STEVENS

The Associated Press
03/27/05 16:33 EST

JERUSALEM (AP) – Thousands of Christians from around the world gathered
at Jerusalem holy sites to celebrate Easter Sunday, marking the day
with prayer and hymns.

The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Michel Sabbah, the top Roman Catholic
official in the Holy Land, celebrated Mass at the Church of the Holy
Sepulcher, built over the skull-shaped rocky mount believed to be
the place where Jesus was crucified.

More than 20 Armenian priests cloaked in black gowns and head dress
followed Sabbah into the candlelit church singing the Lord’s Prayer.
The Catholic priest emerged from the Sepulcher with a flame and lit
worshippers’ candles, which gradually illuminated the painted dome
ceiling erected in the Crusader era.

The Easter services underlined one of Christianity’s doctrinal
differences: Roman Catholics believe Jesus Christ was buried in the
Holy Sepulcher, while many Protestant denominations believe he was
buried in the nearby Garden Tomb.

The recent calm in Israeli-Palestinian fighting has attracted many
more foreign pilgrims to Jerusalem this year for the Holy Week than
in recent years. But the numbers were still lower than the several
thousand who used to come before the outbreak of violence in September
2000.

Karen Abel, 39, a secretary from Eclectic, Ala., was among the
Protestants gathered at sunrise to mark the day at the site of the
Garden Tomb. She said she did not hesitate to make her first trip to
the Holy Land.

“Christ died here for our sins,” she said. “I feel mighty protected
by that.”

Bix Baker, 53, and his wife Becky, 51, came from Minnesota to spend
the Easter holiday with their daughter, who does consulting work for
city officials in Ramallah.

Sitting inside Christianity’s holiest church with his wife and
daughter, the high school science teacher said his students told him
he was crazy to travel to Israel.

“We weren’t afraid to come,” Baker said. “Things seem to be different
now, but we would have come anyway because this is where our daughter
lives.”

Catholics arriving in missionary groups from Spain and France said
they included the ailing Pope in their prayers Sunday.

As part of ongoing efforts to ease travel restraints on the
Palestinian population, the army announced Sunday that as many as
8,200 Palestinians from the West Bank and 250 from Gaza would be
granted daily permits into either Jerusalem or Nazareth during the
Easter celebration.

However, with this year’s celebrations coinciding with the Jewish
Festival of Purim, the Israeli military imposed general travel
restrictions on Palestinians in West Bank and Gaza from Wednesday
through Sunday, steering many Christians away from requesting
permission to travel to Jerusalem.

In Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity, hundreds of worshippers prayed
and lit candles. A few Palestinians inside the church called for
the resignation of Patriarch Irineos I, the highest Greek Orthodox
cleric in the Holy Land, to protest alleged property deals the Greek
Orthodox church has made with Jewish groups trying to expand their
hold on Palestinian neighborhoods in the disputed city.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Yushchenko to Come Back to His Veterans

Kommersant, Russia
March 28 2005

Yushchenko to Come Back to His Veterans

// Ranks of the presidents at the May 9th celebration in Moscow thin

Victory day

Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko Saturday put an end to the
question of his participation in the May 9 celebrations in Moscow
marking the 60th anniversary of the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany.
He will attend the CIS summit on May 8 but he will celebrate the
Victory Day in the Kyiv’s central Kreshchatik street together with
the Ukrainian WW2 veterans. Thus, Ukrainian president has joined
the ranks of those ex-Soviet republics’ leaders who declined to take
part in the Moscow festivities. Thus the event will evidently lack
the propagandistic impact Russian leadership wanted it to have.

“I will feel uneasy when our Ukrainian veterans celebrate the great
Victory down here, in Kyiv, while I will be in Moscow,” Ukrainian
president said Saturday. Victor Yushchenko made a promise, though,
that he would come to Moscow the day before, on May 8, when an
informal CIS summit would take place. He said he hopes that “Mr.
President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and other counterparts will
understand” his decision. Earlier, on March 18, in an interview with
Interfax Ukrainian president gave quite a different itinerary of his:
according to that version he was to celebrate the Victory Day first
in Kreshchatik, then come to Moscow for a few hours.

Be that as it may, Ukrainian president has entered the list of
the ex-Soviet republics’ leaders who refused to take part in the
Moscow celebrations. Earlier this month, Lithuanian president Valdas
Adamkus and his Estonian counterpart Arnold Rüütel turned down
the invitation to visit the Russian capital. The issue of coming is
not settled with the leaders of other countries but according to the
Kommersant’s information, the good half of the post-Soviet countries’
presidents may decline to arrive.

Every leader has his formal reason for the refusal. For instance,
Baltic countries account it for the fact that the WW2 finished for
their countries not in 1945, but in early 90s when the Russian
“occupation” troops were withdrawn. At the same time, the fact
that an opportunity to meet a large number of world leaders may be
missed has not influenced the decision of Lithuanian and Estonian
presidents. The problem has been solved in a simple way: on his way
to Moscow U.S. President George W. Bush will visit Riga on May 6,
where the U.S.A – Baltic states summit will be held.

According to the latest reports Georgian president Mikheil Saakashvili
is not going to visit Moscow either. He pleads the necessity to get
prepared for the visit of the U.S president who will arrive in Tbilisi
on May 10 after the Moscow festivities are over.

If one believes the hints that come from Baku, Azerbaijani president
Ilham Aliyev may refuse to take part in the CIS summit and the Victory
Day celebrations in Moscow as well. The problem here is of a different
kind: Moscow laid its hopes to take advantage of this occasion to
make Azerbaijani president resume talks with Armenian president Robert
Kocharian on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. But the Baku officials lately
have been very skeptical about the way the conflict is being settled
and are not likely to be ready for high-level negotiations.

As a result, the propagandistic impact may prove to be far weaker than
Moscow wanted it to be, since the Kremlin was going to hold the 60th
Victory Day celebrations with even more impressive grandeur than the
300th anniversary of St. Petersburg.

Moreover, the leaders who confirmed they would attend the
Moscow festivities are going to put a fly in the ointment. Polish
President Aleksander Kwasniewski will put forward the question of the
condemnation of Molotov-Ribbetrop Pact which enabled Nazi Germany to
invade Poland and divide the country. Moreover, the Polish president
wants to explain his country’s viewpoint on the Yalta agreements as
of 1945 which split Europe into the two confronting parties.

Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga, the only one of the Baltic
leaders who is to come to Moscow, does it reluctantly. On the one hand
there is a good reason for the visit: the desire to improve tense
relations with Russia. On the other hand, the problems accumulated
cannot be resolved within a couple days spent in Moscow. At any rate,
the political declaration on the principals of relations, which Moscow
was looking forward to be concluded, is not to be signed.

And finally Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi’s participation
in the Moscow celebrations looks very improbable. Media reported
several weeks ago that Japanese PM declined to visit Moscow pledging
the celebrations contemporizing with the second half of the Parliament
session. This lame excuse must have seemed so unconvincing even for
the Japanese officials that the Japanese Foreign Ministry immediately
retracted saying that its final position is not determined yet. It
seems that the question is still being decided upon, and Tokyo still
can’t choose which fits their interests best – a gesture of good will
or the demonstration of steadfastness in the country’s dispute over
the four South Kuril islands.

by Boris Volkhonsky

–Boundary_(ID_voptkMrQt1JRyQpEZrmW7w)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

$275 Thousand Allocated From Government’s Reserve Fund For Holding O

$275 THOUSAND ALLOCATED FROM GOVERNMENT’S RESERVE FUND FOR HOLDING OF
EVENTS DEDICATED TO ARMENIAN GENOCIDE’S 90TH ANNIVERSARY

YEREVAN, MARCH 24, NOYAN TAPAN. RA government allocated 130m, 68.8
thousand drams ($275 thousand) for the purpose of holding of the events
dedicated to the 90th anniversary of Armenian Genocide. According to
the Press Service of RA government, these resources envisaged by the
article “Subsidies Given to Enterprises and Organizations” will be
allocated to the RA Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Culture, Finance and
Economy, Yerevan Mayor’s Office. In accordance with another decision,
102m, 93.5 thousand drams (nearly $220 thousand) was allocated for
holding of the events dedicated to the 1600th anniversary of creation
of the Armenian written language. These resources will be allocated to
the Ministries of Culture, Finance and Economy, Education and Science,
RA government’s staff.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Hamlet Gasparian:”OSCE Fact-Finding Mission’s Report Shows That Azer

HAMLET GASPARIAN: “OSCE FACT-FINDING MISSION’S REPORT SHOWS THAT
AZERBAIJAN BECAME THE VICTIM OF ITS OWN ILLUSIONS”

YEREVAN, MARCH 24, NOYAN TAPAN. The OSCE fact-finding mission’s
report, as well as the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairmen’s letter are the
bright evidence of the fact that Azerbaijan became the victim of its
own illusions and propaganda as the facts represented in the report
completely refute Azerbaijan’s “anxiety” and the represented “data.”
Hamlet Gasparian, Spokesman of RA Foreign Ministry, reported this while
commenting upon the March 23 statement of Azeri Foreign Minister that
“the OSCE fact-finding mission confirmed Azerbaijan’s information and
anxiety about the settlement.” “It’s obvious from the statement that
the Azeri propaganda machine tangled in the figures drawn by it. Thus,
instead of the former 23 thousand represented by them they put forward
the figure of 17 thousand “revealed” by the mission and persist that
these figures are close to each other. But simple addition of numbers
in the report shows that the maximum number of residents makes only
13 thousand people,” RA Foreign Ministry’s Spokesman emphasized. He
mentioned that the problem isn’t in the quantity but in Azerbaijan’s
tactics, i.e to do its best to hamper the serious discussion of the
issue as they aren’t ready for serious obligations: “And a serious
obligation means political responsibility before the international
community and your own people.” In Hamlet Gasparian’s affirmation,
the militant threats that became more frequent lately are one of the
manifestations of Azerbaijan’s above-mentioned tactics. “They behave
as if little blood was shed by now and now they instigate to a new
bloodshed.” As for Azerbaijan’s another affirmation that the report
indirectly affirms that the settlement is carried out by the Republic
of Armenia, according to Hamlet Gasparian, this was also turned upside
down: “The report’s text and the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairmen’s letter
are an exhaustive answer to the very question. Only one quotation from
the letter addressed to the Permanent Council of Co-chairmen: “… the
Mission revealed (some) settlement in the studied territories. The
mission didn’t reveal that such a settlement is the result of Armenian
government’s purposeful policy.” In connection with the possibility
of Azerbaijan’s pursuing the issue of settlement in the UN General
Assembly, RA Foreign Ministry’s Spokesman emphasized that “as it was
mentioned in the Co-chairmen’s letter, the general condition of OSCE
mission’s reception in Nagorno Karabakh was that Azerbaijan is to
stop the speculation of this issue in the UN General Assembly.” If
the Azeri party continues raising the issue in the UN, according to
Hamlet Gasparian, “it will be revealed how much Azerbaijan’s government
respects its own promise given to the international community, in
particular, to the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairmen.” “If nevertheless
Azerbaijan continues its initiative in the UN General Assembly it
will exhaust its authority as a partner in the negotiations,” the
Foreign Ministry’s Spokesman declared.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Ousted Kyrgyz President Arrives in Moscow

Voice of America

Ousted Kyrgyz President Arrives in Moscow

By Anya Ardayeva
Moscow
26 March 2005

Askar Akayev (File photo)

Russian President Vladimir Putin has reportedly offered his help to the new
Kyrgyz leadership. Meanwhile, reports in Moscow say that ousted Kyrgyz
President Askar Akayev has taken refuge in Russia.

Kyrgyzstan’s interim leader, Kurmanbek Bakiyev, says he spoke to the Russian
leader on the phone, and was offered help.

Mr. Bakiyev says the Russian president expressed interest in what was
happening in Kyrgyzstan, and asked if any help from Russia was needed to
stabilize the situation. Mr. Bakiyev said he was grateful to the Russian
leader for showing concern and extending the hand of friendship to
Kyrgyzstan’s new leadership.

Vladimir Putin

Speaking in Yerevan, Armenia, on Friday, Vladimir Putin said the opposition
leaders in Kyrgyzstan who have formed an interim government were known well
in Russia, as they have worked in Kyrgyzstan’s government in the past, and
have contributed to developing relations between Moscow and Bishkek. He said
Russia was ready to do everything to further develop the relations between
the two nations.

Mr. Putin also said that the change of power in the central Asian nation was
a result of weak leadership and multiple social and economic problems in the
country.

The Russian leader said he was sorry that, once again, in the territory of
the former Soviet Union, political questions are solved, “in an unlawful
way,” and are accompanied by what he called pogroms and human casualties. He
called for Kyrgyzstan’s interim leaders to bring the situation in the
country under control.

The Russian president also said that ousted Kyrgyz President Askar Akayev
was welcome to come to Russia.

Mr. Akayev fled the country on March 24, as opposition supporters stormed
government buildings and took control of the capital, Bishkek. On Saturday,
the Interfax news agency reported, the Kremlin confirmed that the ousted
Kyrgyz leader had arrived in Russia. Mr. Akayev has said that he is still
Kyrgyzstan’s legitimate president. Kurmanbek Bakiyev, the opposition leader
appointed by parliament to lead an interim government, said he would run in
a June election to replace Mr. Akayev as president.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress