ANKARA: An ugly “no” from Yerevan

Journal of Turkish Weekly, Turkey
April 14 2005

An ugly “no” from Yerevan

Hurriyet
14 April 2005

By Nerdun HACIOGLU (Hurriyet) – For the first time in history, the
Armenia question was discussed in the Turkish Parliament (TBMM). In
the discussion, Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul revealed that Prime
Minister Tayyip Erdogan had written a letter to Armenian President
Robert Kocharian, inviting him to join Turkey in creating an official
shared commission to look into the Armenian claim of genocide.

The invitation was turned down by Kocharian however, who sent a reply
the same day from Yerevan.

Said Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian at a recent press
conference related to the upcoming genocide anniversary: “On the eve
of the 90th anniversary of the genocide, rather than assuming a more
restrained attitude, Turkey has launched an agressive attack. In
addition to rewriting its own history, Turkey is unashamedly
exporting its ideas on this matters to other countries.”

Oskanian also made a significant reference to Armenia’s fear of
Turkish military strength, saying “For as long as Turkey has a strong
army, and for as long as it supports Azerbijan politically, Armenia
will not feel safe.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

IRAQ: Twisted Turkey

Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)

April 14 2005

IRAQ: Twisted Turkey

Adil Al-Baghdadi

The recent events that have taken place following the dubious flag
burning incident have yet again exposed Turkey to more criticism and
scrutiny by the EU.

The one incident that clearly showed how twisted things are in Turkey
is when a group of four members of a recognized NGO were distributing
leaflets calling for an end to anti-human right measures in Turkish
prisons were brutally beaten and were seconds away from being ripped
apart by an angry lynch mob of about 200 people in Trabzon.

Turkish police stood by and watched the mob rule closing in and
beating the right activists and only intervened once they saw that it
might result in killing and mutilation.

After being beaten severely the four were whisked away with great
difficulty, needless to say the police did not arrest any of those
who took part in the lynching and only used a loudhailer to tell the
angry crowd to disperse.

In any country within the EU an incident like this would have led to
serious public debate, inquiry and would have been preceded by
vigorous pursuit of justice and unwavering search for gang leaders
among the mob who incited against the four human right campaigners.

Then again, any police force within EU member states would have made
immediate arrests among those who took part in the lynching and those
who incited, aided and abetted and caused serious physical harm.

Then they would have been brought before the courts to face criminal
charges which might have included disturbing peace and denying
freedom of expression and all other rights associated campaigning
peacefully in public places, among other serious criminal acts.

In short, this incident would have been dealt with in a manner that
completely contrasts with the way Turkish government, judiciary and
police handled this serious crime, whose responsibility lies with
every level of the country which allowed unspeakable human right
abuses for long time.

However, the more outlandish aspect of this incident is those who
were severely beaten and their human and democratic rights violated
ended up answering for crimes committed by their perpetrators and
were charged for instigating a mob rule.

However, the incident is not isolated and the apparent indifference
of the government and judiciary is evident of how Turkey has been
routinely turning a blind eye to gross violations of human rights for
more than 80 years.

This comes against the backdrop of new freedoms and boldness by Kurds
in Turkey to exercise their cultural and political rights.

The celebration of Kurdish New Year Nawroz has sounded the alarm bell
within Turkey’s ultra-nationalistic institution, the powerful
military establishment, whose influence has been eroded by the
government and by numerous EU adaptation packages.

So in order to stifle the natural progression for Kurds to practise
their newly acquired, albeit limited rights, dark forces within
Turkey’s military and intelligence establishment plotted to mar
Kurdish New Year celebrations with an incident that could easily
galvanize all Turkey against Kurds.

Thus, in very suspicious circumstances two young boys in Mersin were
seen across Turkey TV channels running a mock with a Turkish flag and
then tried to set it light.

Upon their arrest the pair, who aged between 12 and 13 years, were
questioned by the police and both said they were approached by a man
who handed them the flag and told them to burn it.

This well planned attempt to stir Turkish public sentiments and
fervour against Kurds was further played out to wider audience
through the usual nationalistic diatribe spewed out by traditionally
anti-Kurds media.

Although the incident was condemned by almost all Kurdish leaders in
Turkey it was nevertheless amazingly manipulated by none more than
the military establishment.

The most powerful institution in Turkey issued a statement and
warning about tampering with national symbols in which it referred to
Kurds as so-called citizens.
Thus, it implicitly paved they way and gave cart-blanche for any
reprisal action on any individual or group who is perceived to be a
Kurds or supporter of Kurdish rights or defender of any rights for
that matter.

The people on that day in Trabzon who turned so viciously on the
human right campaigners were told that the four belonged to the same
group of those who desecrated the Turkish flag.

The guardian of the constitution and the custodian of the well being
of state of Turkey, the Turkish military establishment has in effect
issued a statement encouraging incitement against Kurds.

The environment of fear and hate created by ethnic strife should have
been capitalized upon by the government in order to reign in on
ultra-nationalistic elements within Turkey who are hampering Turkey’s
acceptance to EU.

The inter-ethnic relations have always been precarious in Turkey
especially now as the government is forced to take well over due
steps to recognize Kurdish rights in North Kurdistan and the genocide
of the Armenians.

These incidents have exposed the fragility of Turkish state, which
has been built on absolute dominance of one race over others,
particularly the second largest population the Kurds.

The only way forward is to rebuild the country on strong foundation
of equality between races and to recognize full rights of other
nations within Turkey, and more importantly to embrace human rights
as a cornerstone of the new society.

Perhaps Turkey can take lessons from its southern neighbour Iraq
which although not a candidate for EU has nearly fulfilled all the
criteria required to join the much-prized club membership, while
Turkey is still trying to come to terms with EU’s adaptation and
harmonization packages.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.krg.org/

TBILISI: Armenian Students Protest at Georgian Embassy in Yerevan

Civil Georgia, Georgia
April 14 2005

Reports: Armenian Students Protest at Georgian Embassy in Yerevan

Armenian students held a protest rally at the Georgian Embassy in
Yerevan to support the ethnic Armenian residents in Georgia’s
Samtkshe-Javakheti region, Regnum reports.

According to the agency, the protesters held banners saying “Georgia
Assimilates Armenians,” “No to Georgian Nazism” and “Georgia
Implements White Genocide.”

At the same time, the agency quotes Arsen Balyan, identified as the
organizer of the rally, as saying “we ask the Georgian authorities
not to react to the provocations of certain forces that want to
escalate inter-ethnic conflicts, as Armenia and Georgia are friendly
countries.”

According to the agency, Georgian envoy Giorgi Saganelidze met the
protesters and assured them that the Georgian government plans to
improve the social conditions of the Armenian residents in Javakheti
by building roads and improving electricity supplies. He also
reportedly assured them that Meskhetian Turks would not be resettled
exclusively into Javakheti and that those who have been suspected of
desacrating Armenian religious objects are already punished.

The report does not specify the number of protesters or the political
movement taking responsibility and no official confirmation of the
report has been given by the authorities.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

When the Vaults of the Armenians Open

When the Vaults of the Armenians Open
J.L. Barnett. The Jerusalem Report. Mar 21, 2005. pg. 20
(Copyright (c) 2005. The Jerusalem Report)

The Armenian Quarter is like a miniature fortress. It is surrounded by
a thousand-year-old wall that itself encases buildings that are more
like buttressed castles than residences, churches, convents,
libraries, shops and schools. Its architectural and spiritual focal
point is the Cathedral of St. James, a building of veritable treasures
and secrets. Named after two saints of the same name, both said to
have been martyred and buried on this site, it is the second holiest
site in the Armenian world, after the city of Etchmiadzin, in Armenia
itself. The latter is the place where Jesus was revealed to Saint
Gregory, the force behind making Armenia the first Christian country,
at the turn of the 4th century CE. Gregory became the first spiritual
leader of the church, the catholicos, and today, the city continues to
be his official seat.

Armenia was the first nation-state to convert to Christianity, in
301. Even before the conversion of the Emperor Constantine, Armenians
were making pilgrimages to Jerusalem. They became adept at never
taking clear sides with the various factions and faiths of the
city. Early Armenian patriarchs even journeyed to Mecca to ensure that
their rights in Jerusalem were protected by their Muslim
overlords. Thus, over the centuries, they have become the ultimate
Jerusalem survivors.

Unlike the Old City’s other three quarters, the Armenian Quarter
jealously guards its privacy by remaining closed to visitors most of
the time. It does, however, open the doors of its cathedral at 3
p.m. every day, when visitors can enter the compound for the magic and
drama of the afternoon Eucharist service. These few minutes in the
Cathedral of St. James will imbue all who see it with a sense of the
nobility of Jerusalem’s Armenians – a tolerant and refined people with
vast temporal and spiritual wealth, a tremendous sense of history,
wielding legendary power, but doing so with the greatest of style and
discretion. The Armenians are perhaps the embodiment of what a
venerable Jerusalem community should be.

(Copyright (c) 2005. The Jerusalem Report)

In the summer of 1989, while walking with a heavy backpack through the
Old City, I met a man named Alfonso, who offered me help with my bag,
which was stuffed with old rugs and silks and fine burnished
copperware that I had bought in Damascus. Alfonso was a Franciscan
monk from Rome who had recently arrived in Jerusalem, at the end of a
five-year pilgrimage by foot from India. A man of short stature but
incredibly powerful build, Alfonso was the extrovert’s extrovert.

Over the strongest of Turkish coffees, Alfonso told me how he had left
his native Roman Church, less over doctrinal issues than social and
ethical considerations, and how in the end he had elected to convert
to Armenian Orthodoxy. He said he had felt at home in Armenia, where
he had lived for many months before coming to the Holy Land. His quick
mastery of the Armenians’ script and spoken language was impressive,
his knowledge of their history encyclopedic.

In the fifth and sixth centuries, rivalries between the Eastern and
Western churches, based in Constantinople and Rome respectively, led
to a dramatic and clear schism between the two. The Eastern churches
(Coptic, Ethiopian, Syrian and Malabar Jacobite and Armenian)
developed a monophysite view of Jesus – the belief that he was of one
composite form, both human and divine simultaneously, in much the same
way that body and soul are combined in man. This was formally and
eternally denounced as a heresy at the Council of Chalcedon, in 451,
causing a fracture between the two Orthodoxies that exists to this
day.

The final break between the Eastern and Western churches came during
the Crusader period: In 1204, the marauding knights from the West
looted, sacked and destroyed Christian Constantinople, the center of
the Eastern faiths, an event that left a still-gaping wound in the
Christian world.

The Armenian Quarter is like a miniature fortress. It is surrounded by
a thousand-year-old wall that itself encases buildings that are more
like buttressed castles than residences, churches, convents,
libraries, shops and schools. Its architectural and spiritual focal
point is the Cathedral of St. James, a building of veritable treasures
and secrets. Named after two saints of the same name, both said to
have been martyred and buried on this site, it is the second holiest
site in the Armenian world, after the city of Etchmiadzin, in Armenia
itself. The latter is the place where Jesus was revealed to Saint
Gregory, the force behind making Armenia the first Christian country,
at the turn of the 4th century CE. Gregory became the first spiritual
leader of the church, the catholicos, and today, the city continues to
be his official seat.

James, the brother of Jesus (who has been much in the news in the past
two years, after discovery of an ossuary that was said to have been
inscribed with his name, and which was subsequently declared to be a
fake), is said to be buried under the high altar of St. James’s
Cathedral, and James the Apostle, brother of John the Evangelist, was
beheaded on this spot on the orders of Herod Agrippa in 44 CE. In a
glorious side chapel, covered from floor to ceiling with mother of
pearl, fayence, lapis lazuli and precious gemstones, his embalmed head
lies in a silken gold-thread sack, directly below an intricately
crafted silver grill.

Over the years, I have been taken through no fewer than 22 discreetly
hidden doors, which lead to rooms of all sizes, fanning out in every
direction from the central area of the cathedral. In this labyrinth of
side chapels, services take place at seemingly random times, following
a wonderfully varied musical tradition that includes Eucharists,
dirge-like incantations and joyful praise.

One recent evening, I received a phone call advising me to come
immediately to the church, a medieval structure built upon extensive
Georgian church remains that were in turn built upon Byzantine
remains. It was the Feast Day of Saint Macarius, one of the 10 early
Christians beheaded in Alexandria during the 3rd-century persecution
of Roman emperor Decius, and the patriarch, as he does sometimes, had
called for a full ceremonial procession.

The church’s main room, its floor covered with hundreds of magnificent
oriental rugs, was packed. Its beautiful blue wall tiles glittered
under the flicker of a myriad of candles, which hung from enormous
lanterns suspended from chains that disappeared into a darkened domed
ceiling.

Exactly 100 bearded, black-robed and hooded monks were lined up, in
dignified silence, acting as solemn sentinels for the forthcoming
procession, which commenced with three thunderous bangs on the stone
floor.

As the procession began – led by 24 monks in glittering cloaks, each
one carrying jewels worthy of a monarch – I understood that my evening
caller had done me a fine favor. The Glorious Treasury of Saint Menas,
one of the most valuable and jealously guarded in all of Christendom,
had been opened, its contents handed out for use in the service.

Armenia was the first nation-state to convert to Christianity, in
301. Even before the conversion of the Emperor Constantine, Armenians
were making pilgrimages to Jerusalem. They became adept at never
taking clear sides with the various factions and faiths of the
city. Early Armenian patriarchs even journeyed to Mecca to ensure that
their rights in Jerusalem were protected by their Muslim
overlords. Thus, over the centuries, they have become the ultimate
Jerusalem survivors.

Never being in conflict meant that this community became a magnet for
enormous wealth from the large and cultured Armenian
diaspora. Additionally, tens of thousands of gifts have been bestowed
upon the Armenian Patriarchate by monarchs and military leaders,
sheikhs and caliphs, patriarchs and czars, aristocrats and
pilgrims. Hence, the illuminated manuscripts of the library-church of
St. Theodorus constitute one of the most important ancient Christian
libraries in the world; the treasury is the envy of the Vatican; the
reliquary is a virtual directory of the early saints; and perhaps most
impressive of all, there’s a sense of pride and majesty that make the
Armenians the princes among the seven principal patriarchates of
Jerusalem.

That night, I was given a rare glimpse of some of the treasures being
used. (The only time they are regularly brought out of the locked
cellars beneath the cathedral where they are normally stored, is
during Holy Week.)

An exquisite cloak 12 feet long was worn by one church official, its
train held by six choir boys from Armenia – an 1804 gift from Napoleon
Bonaparte to the patriarch during his Middle East campaign. It glinted
with the famed Napoleonic honey bee symbols, made up of diamonds and
emeralds stitched on to each corner.

Next came 17 monks, each carrying a red velvet cushion upon which sat
a crown, tiara or diadem, and then dozens of other officials carrying
golden chalices, old silken fabrics, bishop’s miters from the august
heads of previous clerics, swords, shields and a whole panoply of
saints’ remains – a hair from the beard of Vincent, the patron saint
of vineyards; a toe bone of Crispin, guardian of shoemakers; the
mummified tongue of Ursula of Antioch, a saint invoked for those who
pray for a good death; the cranium of Dympra of Byzantium, patron
saint of the insane; the staff of Menos from Benevento, whose virtues
were praised by St. Gregory the Great; and finally, a tiny golden vase
said to contain milk from the breast of the Virgin Mary herself.

It was an awesome scene: the singing, the heavy smell of frankincense
being cast around the church by incense lanterns made of metalwork so
intricate it looked like lace; the costumes, the solemnity of the
procession, the dull thud of the wood and iron banging from
outside. (Bell-ringing is not practiced at St. James, in remembrance
of the Muslim ban on bells within Jerusalem until 1840. The ban
followed the enforced demolition of the Holy Sepulcher belfry in the
14th century, meant to make the church lower than the nearby mosque’s
minaret. A bell-less belfry led to use in their place of wooden planks
to summon the Christian faithful to prayer, a custom the Armenians
continue to this day.)

But church services and mysterious ceremonies are not all there is to
the Armenian Quarter and its community. I see many likenesses between
the Jews and the Armenians. The latter are an old people, numbering
about 3 million worldwide, with their own language and culture, and
they too are masters of survival as a minority within an often hostile
host society. They are refined, cultured, sophisticated, materially
successful and always, wherever they are, with their hearts stubbornly
yearning for their ancient land.

As with the Jews, too, the suffering of the Armenians has been
great. April 24 is the Day of Remembrance for the Armenian Holocaust
of 1915-1918, when millions were either massacred or forced into exile
by the Turks.

Those massacres brought the largest wave of Armenians to Jerusalem
since their original arrival in the 4th century. In the 1920s they
enjoyed a tremendous revival under British Mandate rule, when they
applied their famed skills in ceramic tile and pottery work to
decorating churches, synagogues and mosques alike. To this day,
Armenian pottery is one of the city’s most recognizable crafts.

Again like the Jews, this people treasures one thing above all else –
scholarship. The Armenian Quarter is home to many seminaries, convents
and monasteries, and there is constant traffic between Jerusalem and
the various Armenian communities throughout the world.

Most of the quarter’s 500 residents (along with Jerusalem’s 2,500
other Armenians) lead quiet practical lives in regular trades and
professions. All over Israel, the Armenian Church has real estate
holdings – they are reputed to be the third-largest landholder in
Jerusalem, after the Israeli government and the Greek church.

Within the Holy Sepulcher, in the Christian Quarter, the Armenians are
key power brokers, controlling chapels, objects and the vast floor
spaces between columns 8 and 11 and 15 and 18, out of a total of 20
columns and pillars that support the great Crusader rotunda of the
church. This might seem trifling, but in the wider world of Orthodox
Christendom, these are crucial symbols of worldly power in a church
where every square foot is contested.

Some days ago I was back in the Armenian cathedral, having just
attended a service in another hidden corner of the quarter – the
Church of the House of Annas. Outside the house is a place of deep
significance for Armenians, for there grows an olive tree that they
believe is descended from the one Jesus was tied to when he was
scourged prior to the Passion.

As I stared at this ancient tree, Bishop Gulbenkian, one of the
quarter’s 12 bishops, came over. We talked of that summer 15 years ago
when Alfonso and I had wandered into the compound, and got to know
many of its residents so well. His Grace Gulbenkian informed me, with
some sadness, that Alfonso had returned the following year to the fold
of his mother church in Rome, after only a short dalliance with
Armenian Orthodoxy.

I left the compound through the Door of Kerikor, installed in 1646 and
named for the patriarch of the day. As I left through the dark,
brooding, vaulted porch of the door, gates were banged and bolted
behind me as the quarter nestled down for the night.

Unlike the Old City’s other three quarters, the Armenian Quarter
jealously guards its privacy by remaining closed to visitors most of
the time. It does, however, open the doors of its cathedral at 3
p.m. every day, when visitors can enter the compound for the magic and
drama of the afternoon Eucharist service. These few minutes in the
Cathedral of St. James will imbue all who see it with a sense of the
nobility of Jerusalem’s Armenians – a tolerant and refined people with
vast temporal and spiritual wealth, a tremendous sense of history,
wielding legendary power, but doing so with the greatest of style and
discretion. The Armenians are perhaps the embodiment of what a
venerable Jerusalem community should be.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or
distribution is prohibited without permission.
Section:   Tales Of A City
ISSN/ISBN:   07926049
Text Word Count   2025
Document URL:    

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Lavrenti Barseghian: Number of Genocide Survivors Dwindles

LAVRENTI BARSEGHIAN: NUMBER OF THOSE WHO EXPERIENCED GENOCIDE
GRADUALLY DECREASES, WHICH GLADDENS TURKISH AUTHORITIES

YEREVAN, APRIL 14, NOYAN TAPAN. In 1995 the number of those who
experienced the Genocide made 4600 people, in 1999 2295 people, in
2001 1393, in 2003 only 886 people remained and today this number is
smaller. Lavrenti Barseghian, Director of RA NAS Museum-Institute of
Genocide, presented these data during the April 13 meeting at Yerevan
Economic University. He said that the gradual decrease in the number
of those who experienced the Genocide gladdens the Turkish authorities
as each of them is a live fact, evidence of those events. L.Barseghian
said that more than 70 Turkish diplomats were killed by Armenian
avengers during the years following the Genocide. According to the
Museum-Institute’s director, these avengers executed the 1918 verdict
of Turkish military tribunal in relation to a number of Turkish
political and military figures in different countries, including
Taleat, Jemal and others. The latters had been sentenced for the
slaughter of Armenians but had escaped penalty. In fact, in 1918 the
Turkish government convicted 1350 Turks who committed this
crime. L.Barseghian is sure that this legal procedure of Turkish
government is a fact of recognition of Armenian Genocide in itself.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Azeri Speaker: OSCE MG Attitude to Karabakh Issue Not Serious

Pan Armenian News

AZERI SPEAKER: OSCE MG ATTITUDE TO KARABAKH ISSUE NOT SERIOUS

14.04.2005 03:06

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Yesterday Chairman of the Milli Mejlis of Azerbaijan
Murtuz Aleskerov received OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Miklos
Haraszti. Touching upon the Nagorno Karabakh conflict Mr. Aleskerov reported
«the problem puts serious obstacles in the way of development and prospering
of Azerbaijan; international organizations, including the OSCE Minsk Group
do not have a serious attitude towards the problem.» «I think that the OSCE
MG should activate efforts, apply serious sanctions against the invader and
attain the soonest and fair solution of the conflict. Neither should the
OSCE Human Rights Committee be indifferent towards it, but should make its
presence felt,» Aleskerov emphasized. Haraszti reported that the Karabakh
issue is in focus of the attention of the OSCE. «I suppose that using its
capacities and authority the OSCE MG should attain a solution of the
conflict. I hope you will feel positive changes in the OSCE activities,» M.
Haraszti stated.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Parlement turc entame un premier debat sur les massacres d’Armeniens

Agence France Presse
13 avril 2005 mercredi 12:24 PM GMT

Le Parlement turc entame un premier débat sur les massacres d’Arméniens

ANKARA 13 avr 2005

Le Parlement turc a entamé mercredi un débat sur les contre-mesures
que la Turquie compte prendre face à une campagne arménienne pour la
reconnaissance en tant que génocide des massacres d’Arméniens de
1915-17.

Ankara refuse catégoriquement l’emploi du terme de “génocide” pour
qualifier ces tueries commises pendant les dernières années de
l’empire ottoman.

Le débat, le premier du genre sur ce sujet sensible, a été convoqué
par le Parti de la Justice et du Développement (AKP, au pouvoir) et
le principal parti d’opposition, le Parti Républicain du peuple
(CHP). Il doit donner lieu à des discours des députés et l ministre
des Affaires étrangères Abdullah Gul prendra la parole au nom du
gouvernement pour expliquer sa stratégie.

Lundi, lors d’une visite en Norvège, le Premier ministre Recep Tayyip
Erdogan a précisé que la déclaration commune adoptée par les députés
serait envoyée aux Parlements de plusieurs pays.

Certains hommes politiques de l’Union européenne ont appelé la
Turquie à un “travail de mémoire” et affirmé que le sujet serait une
des questions que la Turquie devrait régler avant le début de ses
négociations d’adhésion à l’Union, programmé pour le 3 octobre.

Les massacres et les déportations d’Arméniens ont fait entre 1,2
million et 1,3 million de morts, selon les Arméniens, et jusqu’à
300.000 morts selon les Turcs.

La Turquie reconnaît que des massacres ont été perpétrés et que de
nombreux Arméniens sont morts de fatigue, de maladie ou d’attaques
commises notamment par des bandes kurdes lors de leur déportation.

Mais elle affirme qu’il s’agissait d’une répression dans un empire en
déclin contre une population coupable de collaboration avec l’ennemi
russe dans un contexte de guerre et que des dizaines de milliers de
Turcs ont été tués au même moment par des rebelles nationalistes
arméniens.

Mardi, le président de l’institut turc d’histoire, le professeur
Yusuf Halacoglu, a réfuté la thèse de 1,5 millions d’Arméniens tués
et évoqué la mort de quelque 100.000 Arméniens lors de leur difficile
périple vers la Syrie.

La Turquie, où vivent actuellement 45.000 Arméniens, a reconnu
l’Arménie à son indépendance en 1991, mais sans établir de relations
diplomatiques.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Une Epuration ethnique sous couvert de la guerre, Genocide Armenien

La Croix , France
13 avril 2005

Une épuration ethnique sous couvert de la guerre. LE GÉNOCIDE
ARMÉNIEN Ce soir, 20 h 45, Arte

PLOQUIN Jean-Christophe

En 1915, le mot “génocide” n’existait pas.

Le 24 mai de cette année-là, pour décrire le massacre de dizaines de
milliers d’Arméniens d’Anatolie déjà perpétré par le régime ottoman,
la France, la Grande-Bretagne et la Russie utilisent dans une
déclaration commune les termes de “crimes contre l’humanité” et
“contre la civilisation”. Depuis plusieurs semaines, à l’est de
l’Anatolie, des villages sont vidés de leur population arménienne.
Les hommes sont sommairement assassinés, les femmes, les enfants et
les vieillards sont déportés et contraints d’avancer dans une marche
meurtrière qui doit les amener à Alep puis à Deir-Ez-Zor, en Syrie.

À l’aide d’archives, émaillées du témoignage de deux survivants, le
documentaire de Laurence Jourdan fait peu à peu entrer dans
l’horreur. Durant plus de dix-huit mois, une entreprise systématique
de déracinement de la population arménienne se traduit en politique
d’extermination. Entre 1 million et 1,5 million d’Arméniens seront
tués; environ 600 000 ont survécu. Alors que la guerre fait rage en
Europe, le sort des Arméniens d’Anatolie n’est guère connu que de
quelques diplomates. Des consuls américains ou allemands, présents
dans plusieurs villes, perçoivent très vite que l’objectif réel du
gouvernement ottoman n’est pas de chasser les Arméniens des régions
proches du front russe, où ils sont accusés de jouer les cinquièmes
colonnes, mais d’homogénéiser l’Anatolie. Dans un contexte général de
montée des nationalismes, les Turcs se définissent de plus en plus
comme une ethnie, attachée à une religion, l’islam, et à un
territoire. Les Arméniens, dans leur logique, sont de trop. Neuf
décennies plus tard, le génocide des Arméniens reste un tabou dans
une Turquie dont les officiels continuent de nier la pluralité des
peuples qui l’habitent.

JEAN-CHRISTOPHE PLOQUIN

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

“Orinats Yerkir” Warns: Nobody to Succeed in Compromising Party

REPRESENTATIVE OF “ORINATS YERKIR” WARNS: NOBODY TO SUCCEED IN
COMPROMISING HIS PARTY AND ITS YOUNG LEADER

YEREVAN, APRIL 13, NOYAN TAPAN. “I want to warn all those who will try
from now on to compromise “Orinats Yerkir” (Country of Law) party and
its young leader Artur Baghdasarian: they will not succeed, as our
party is the people’s party, our owner is the people and we are those
expressing its will,” Gagik Avetian, a member of “Orinats Yerkir”
faction stated at the Parliament on April 12. According to him, the
idea, that there is somebody who enjoys people’s love and respect,
gives some politicians no rest. “What of it? Is he guilty that the
people loves and recieves him, that he is recieved in the four sides
of the world? Is he guilty that he is young and clever? Who disturbs
you, be such as well,” the MP advised Artur Baghdasarian’s
opponents. He stated that “Orinats Yerkir” does not disturb anybody
and will not allow to disturb him: “We have enough both human and
mental resources to be able to confront any blow.” Gagik Avetian
called partners to occupy themselves with law making work instead of
falling disrespectful abuses and contumelies in address of other
parties or their leaders.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress