Genocide armenien: un geste de la Turquie vers l’Armenie

Les Echos , France
14 avril 2005

GĂ©nocide armĂ©nien: un geste de la Turquie vers l’ArmĂ©nie

La Turquie a rĂ©cemment adressĂ© une lettre Ă  l’ArmĂ©nie proposant la
crĂ©ation d’une commission conjointe afin d’enquĂȘter sur les massacres
des Arméniens de 1915, a déclaré, hier, le ministre des Affaires
Ă©trangĂšres, Abdullah Gul, lors d’un premier dĂ©bat au Parlement turc
sur le sujet. Cette lettre du Premier ministre turc, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, a été adressée au président arménien Robert Kotcharian,
a-t-il dit, indiquant que la mise en place de cette commission
constituera un premier pas vers la normalisation des relations avec
l’ArmĂ©nie.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Genocidio armeni: ancora troppo spesso negato

Schweizerische Depeschenagentur AG (SDA)
SDA – Servizio di base in Italiano
April 14, 2005

Genocidio armeni: ancora troppo spesso negato, secondo ASA

BERNA

Novant’anni dopo l’inizio de genocidio degli armeni ad opera
dell’Impero Ottomano, in Svizzera e’ ancora troppo spesso negato. Lo
ha dichiarato oggi a Berna il consigliere nazionale e presidente del
gruppo parlamentare armeno Dominique de Buman (PPD/FR) in una
conferenza stampa dell’Associazione Svizzera- Armenia (ASA).

Il consiglio nazionale ha riconosciuto nel 2003 come genocidio
l’espulsione di numerosi armeni nel 1915-1916 e l’uccisione di oltre
un milione di questi. De Buman ha domandato che lo stesso faccia il
Consiglio federale. Per Auschwitz personalita’ politiche e religiose
hanno chiesto da tempo il perdono, ha precisato.

Rivolgendosi al Consiglio federale, De Buman si e’ espresso a favore
di un’estensione dei rapporti tra la Svizzera e gli armeni e ha
chiesto per una volta di avere il coraggio di mettere in secondo
piano i calcoli economici e materiali. “La priorita’ data ai valori
economici ci preoccupa”, ha detto De Buman.

In Svizzera il non riconoscimento del genocidio degli armeni diventa
sempre piu’ “normale”, ha detto Sarkis Shahinian, copresidente
dell’ASA. Il silenzio del Consiglio federale al riguardo e’ stato
letto dai media come un suo non riconoscimento del genocidio, ha
detto.

Da parte sua Laurent Auberson, storico e autore dell’opuscolo
“Armeni. Evocazione di un genocidio e sua importanza per la
Svizzera”, ha sottolineato che i fatti relativi allo sterminio degli
armeni ad opera dell’impero Ottomano non sono messi in discussione.

Quanto alla proposta avanzata ieri dal primo ministro turco di creare
una commissione congiunta con l’Armenia per indagare sui crimini del
1915-1916, si tratta di una “nuova manovra demagogica della Turchia
per sottrarsi alle sue responsabilita'”, ha dichiarato Sarkis
Shahinian. “Prima di questo suggerimento, il primo ministro ha detto
chiaramente che non riconoscera’ il genocidio”, ha insistito. Secondo
Shahinian, e’ una “reazione isterica” della Turchia di fronte alle
pressioni politiche internazionali. Da 90 anni la Turchia vive su una
menzogna, se la si toglie, crolla, ha spiegato.

In occasione della celebrazione dell’anniversario dell’inizio del
genocidio, il 24 aprile 1915, l’ASA organizza una serie di
commemorazioni in tutta la Svizzera. Dal 17 al 24 aprile a Neuchatel,
Ginevra, Losanna, Zurigo e Berna si terranno delle cerimonie nel
corso delle quali saranno interpretate opere del compositore armeno
Komitas.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Community and Right NGO Blames Orinats Yerkir Party for Misreps.

COMMUNITY AND RIGHT NGO BLAMES ORINATS YERKIR PARTY FOR
MISREPRESENTING SOME FACTS

YEREVAN, APRIL 14, NOYAN TAPAN. “RA NA Speaker Artur Baghdasarian’s
well-known article calling on for holding of honest and fair elections
in the future is indeed addressed to western countries, he means that
the only bearer of western values is the Orinats Yerkir (Country of
Law) party,” Samvel Mkrtchian, Chairman of the Community and Right
NGO, declared during the April 14 press conference. He blamed the
Orinats Yerkir party for misrepresenting the real responses of
society. Thus, after the publication of A.Baghdasarian’s article
“Choice of the Future or for the Sake of Public Consent” in many
newspapers, the responses of NGOs supporting the Speaker’s appeal
appeared in the Aravot newspaper and the Community and Right NGO was
also mentioned among the organizations that joined the Speaker’s
initiative. While, according to Mkrtchian, the organization headed by
him didn’t give its official consent to supporting A.Baghdasarian’s
initiative. He didn’t exclude that some Orinats Yerkir members could
bestow a doubtful benefit upon A.Baghdasarian. Samvel Mkrtchian said
that 8 thousand people are united by the Community and Right
organization: “We won’t permit to turn us into somebody’s supplement.”
He refuted the supposition about the possible fulfilment of a certain
political order by him aimed at dicreditation of the Orinats Yerkir
party. As for his attitude to this political force, he declared that
he Community and Right NGO has always struggled for establishment of
democracy and Orinats Yerkir is one of the largest falsificators of
the previous elections. “I will follow the party I really believe,”
Mkrtchian declared. Meanwhile he didn’t exlude the fact that the
Community and Right organization may become a political party in the
future.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Georgia: Armenians bargain with government

Institute for War and Peace Reporting
April 14 2005

GEORGIA: ARMENIANS BARGAIN WITH GOVERNMENT

A delegation of Armenians seeks a shift of policy in Tbilisi

By Olesya Vartanian in Akhalkalaki and Tbilisi

In the first meeting of its kind, a group of around 20 Armenians from
the southern region of Javakheti are meeting Georgian cabinet
ministers to discuss the region’s many social problems.

The three days of talks, set to begin on April 14, are seen as a test
of the Georgian authorities’ commitment to the under-developed
region, in which around 90 per cent of the population is ethnic
Armenian.

The Javakheti Armenians will meet with officials in the education,
culture, transport and conflict settlement ministries in Tbilisi and
also the parliamentary human rights committee.

If new policies come out of the meetings it will be a significant
victory for the young delegation, most of whose members come from a
newly formed organisation called Yediny Javakhk, or United
Javakheti.

If not, it may strengthen the hand of sceptical Armenians who say
Tbilisi is deliberately neglecting the region.

Yediny Javakhk shot to prominence on March 13 – just three days after
it was first founded – when it organized a meeting of 8,000 people
in the centre of Akhalkalaki, the main town of Javakheti.

The organization’s mainly young members said they had come together
so quickly in response to reports that the pro-government Georgian
youth movement Kmara was planning a protest rally in Akhalkalaki,
against a local Russian military base which is the main centre of
employment for the local population.

But the young Yediny Javakhk quickly split into a more moderate and
more radical wing.

While the moderates sought to contact the Georgian government, the
radical members undertook political agitation, brought people to the
rally, made banners and invited a pop-group from Armenia to perform.

“We want to achieve the rights that our people are entitled to as
citizens of Georgia,” Artur Pogosian, one of the leaders of the
moderate wing, told IWPR. “We do not want to be second- or
third-class citizens.”

“For the last 15 years our people have been silent and loyal to all
three presidents of Georgia,” he added. “And today the time has come
for the government to pay attention to us.”

The radicals have refused to take part in the Tbilisi delegation.

Vaag Chakhalian, one of the more radical leaders of the organisation,
is sceptical about the moderates’ approach.

“If they really want to solve problems, then we are ready to work
with them,” he told IWPR.

But he insisted this could not take the form of opposition figures
being bought off with highly paid jobs in government, “We need
problems to be put to them and to be solved.”

Tbilisi political analyst Gia Nodia said he was not surprised by the
schism. “[This organisation] is the latest attempt to find some
common interests or common demands, around which people can unite,”
he told IWPR. “But differences in interests, conceptions of strategy
or political ambitions generally stand in the way of this unity.”

At the March 13 rally Pogosian read out a letter to the government of
Georgia setting out the problems of the region, one of the most
backward in Georgia.

Many of the issues – including ineffective local government, poor
electricity supply, bad roads and problems with customs, taxes and
passports – also apply elsewhere in the country.

Others are specific to Javakheti – like the demand that Armenian
history be taught in schools and that official paperwork be done in
the Armenian language as well as Russian.

But calls for autonomy or secession from Georgia were muted at the
rally, in contrast with the more nationalist days of the early 1990s.

A major demand is for the government in Tbilisi to ease pressure on
the Russian military base in Akhalkalaki, which large numbers of
locals regard as an important strategic and economic asset in the
region.

“It’s always the ordinary folk who suffer,” said local resident
Bograt Kakosian, “those in comfortable jobs don’t have any problems.”

“People are selling their last calf to get a visa and move to Russia
– and there, because relations between Russia and Georgia are so bad,
they risk getting deported just because they are a citizen of
Georgia. And if they close the base, it will be bad for us in Georgia
too.”

Most of those who came to the rally were seasonal workers, who find
employment in Russia for part of the year because there are no jobs
at home. Until recently, they had to spend time and money getting
foreign passports in the regional capital Akhaltsikhe. But following
the rally, the government has set up a new passport office in
Akhalkalaki.

Artur Yeremian – the gamgebeli, or governor, of Akhalkalaki – says
problems like this occur because the central government does not
understand the complexities of the region.

“Every ministry is told to carry out reforms,” he said. “But no one
is interested how they come about, [even though] every region has its
special features.”

One of the leaders of Yediny Javakhk, who asked to remain anonymous,
said the main reason for the region’s social ills was the domination
of several powerful clans, who operate according to their business
interests, are supported by the authorities in Tbilisi and Yerevan,
and have influence on the local government.

Nodia explained that one of these clans in particular, grouped around
the family of parliamentarian Melik Raisian, had enabled the
government in Tbilisi to exert control over the region.

“[The government] gave the leaders who spoke out against Tbilisi
well-paid posts,” he told IWPR. “And by doing so, it calmed them
down. This policy went on under Shevardnadze and there has not been
any principled change of policy under the current government. It is
relying on influential local players and not on civic democratic
progress.”

Nodia said that these kind of intrigues had naturally made people
suspicious
about the new Yediny Javakhk movement, “Many people thought the
rallies in
Akhalkalaki were designed to discredit someone so someone else could
take
his place. that it was being done to strengthen the position of
people
close to [interior minister Vano] Merabishvili or to the president.”

Merabishvili comes from Samtskhe-Javakheti and wields a lot of
influence in
the region. On March 27 he met the Yediny Javakhk moderates and
persuaded
them not to take part in a rally that had been called for March 31.
He himself promised to visit the region in May and check on the
enforcement of government policy there.

At the meeting with the minister, the decision was taken to create a
Javakheti Public Committee which would be in regular consultation
with the government in Tbilisi.

“I see the solution in a dialogue between representatives of the
region and
the authorities, so the authorities understand what we want,” said
Samvel
Manukian one of the Yediny Javakhk moderate leaders. “If not, we will
call another rally in the middle of May.”

In the event, the March 31 rally was dominated by the Sport-Cultural
Union
of Youth of Javakheti, JEMM, which has more of an Armenian
nationalist
agenda – amongst other things, it calls on Georgia to recognize the
Armenian genocide of 1915.

Vaag Chakhalian of JEMM said he saw no point in negotiating with the
Georgian government because he said the Javakheti Armenians had been
deceived many times in the past.

Olesya Vartanian is a correspondent with Southern Gates newspaper in
Samtskhe-Javakheti region, which is supported by IWPR.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Bar fight in Armenia

Institute for War and Peace Reporting
April 14 2005

BAR FIGHT IN ARMENIA

A new barristers’ association is riven with disputes even before it
gets off the ground.

By Zhanna Alexanian in Yerevan

The start of Armenia’s new Bar Chamber, which it was hoped would
improve the professional standing of lawyers in the country, has been
delayed by a bitter fight over the election of a chairman, which has
ended up in court.

The only winners, say independent lawyers, are officials who want to
keep exerting political control over the judiciary.

This week, two rival candidates to head the new body are in court,
after the losing candidate alleged that the ballot was rigged.

A new law on the bar, effective as of February 1, instituted the Bar
Chamber so that Armenian lawyers would operate under one umbrella
body, instead of the two previous organisations.

David Harutiunian, Armenian justice minister, hailed the new Bar Act
as a “sound piece of legislation that will help shape Armenia’s
justice system”.

“By creating a new, consolidated Bar Chamber, we are establishing a
powerful body that will dictate legal ethnics and regulate other
issues as yet not covered by any laws or codes,” the minister told
IWPR. “The stronger the Bar, the stronger the government, and the
better the justice system overall,” he added.

However, the March 19-20 inaugural meeting of the new chamber – at
which its leadership was to be elected – ended in an acrimonious
dispute, which left the nascent institution unable to start work.

The election for the chairmanship was won by a margin of seven votes
by Enok Azarian, 40, deputy chairman of the Union of Barristers of
Armenia. Azarian is a doctor of law who says he wants to found a new
law school in Armenia.

However, the result is being contested by the losing candidate, Ruben
Saakian, a well-known lawyer. Azarian cannot take up his post until
the court decides on a verdict.

“This was just another case of rigged elections in Armenia,”
complained Saakian. He and his supporters claim there were numerous
irregularities in the way the vote was conducted – for example, that
lawyers who had not taken a re-qualifying exam were allowed to vote
and that voting was suspended for one hour and, as a result, many
participants were unable to vote.

The Yerevan office of the American Bar Association, ABA/CEELI, which
organised the meeting and also observed the voting, said that the
vote had been fair and an audit commission had only noted a few minor
irregularities that “did not affect the voting results”.

Karen Kendrick, Armenian country director of ABA/CEELI, said the
process was “messy but democratic” and said there had been no
political intervention in the vote.

Kendrick characterised the row as an unfortunate beginning for a
much-needed organisation. She told IWPR, “Advocates have been a
dispirited group in Armenia and haven’t felt they have had the
respect of other members of the judiciary, like judges and
prosecutors. They see this as an opportunity to raise the reputation
of their profession.”

Well-known lawyer Tigran Janoyan insisted that Saakian had not been
cheated of victory for some political reason. “The ballot was open,
fair and transparent,” he told IWPR. “It is unacceptable when some
people try to discredit the Bar institution for their own personal
ends. As it is, we have enough problems trying to ensure that
barristers are treated with due respect.”

Although the new legislation has been generally welcomed, another
area of controversy is a new provision in the law establishing the
institution of “public defender”, without clarifying how it should be
funded. Public defenders will act as defence lawyers paid for by the
state. The law provides for a certain number to be elected from among
practicing lawyers, but fails to specify how much funding the state
is willing to allocate to support them.

“Our cash-strapped government wants more democracy than it can
afford,” said Janoyan. “They probably expect the Bar to pay for
public defenders, and if that fails, then the Bar will be held
responsible.”

Janoyan said that there is a tradition of state lawyers in Armenia
creating more problems for their clients than they help solve. “They
will always do the state’s bidding,” he said. “A state lawyer is
assigned in the early days of an investigation. That’s when charges
are trumped up and people are forced into making confessions.”

According to Janoyan, some 70 per cent of Armenian lawyers are in
cahoots with judges and prosecutors. He even alleges that lawyers
have ties to organised crime.

“Justice is anything but ‘just’ these days,” he said. “Barristers are
not magicians, but when they sell out to the judicial system it
confuses citizens and makes them defenceless.”

Minister of justice Harutunian said lack of funds should not be an
obstacle to the institution of public defenders, “In theory, public
defenders should be sponsored by the state. Whilst our country is not
wealthy enough to afford a good institution [public defenders], it
cannot afford to have a bad one either.

“Funding has been increasing year on year. Things are getting
better.”

Fears are being expressed that the quarrel in the new chamber is
damaging the reputation of Armenian lawyers just as they are trying
to become more independent. Tigran Ter Esayan, a former president of
the International Bar Association, described the ongoing internal
strife within the Bar Chamber as “a disgrace”, saying it gives
Armenian lawyers a “bad name”.

“What’s going on is the opposite of consolidation, and that’s exactly
what the government wants,” he told IWPR. “This cannot be good and
the split will only get worse.”

Mikael Danielian, chairman of Armenia’s Helsinki Association, a
leading human rights group, also took part in the vote and expressed
disappointment at the way it ended.

“If these are the people who should be defending the letter of the
law, how can we trust them?” he asked. Danielian expressed sympathy
for the winner, Azarian, saying, “He is young and he has behaved
decently throughout all this.”

“Seeing all this happening, how can anyone trust a lawyer any more?”
said Nino Sarkisian, the mother of a soldier killed while doing
military service.
“These people are going out of their way to put each other down. How
are they going to defend us in court?”

Zhanna Alexanian is a correspondent with in
Yerevan.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.armenianow.com

Russian gov’t to view law on Kaliningrad today

RosBusinessConsulting Database
April 14, 2005 Thursday 1:54 am, EST

Russian gov’t to view law on Kaliningrad today

The Russian government will consider draft federal laws on the
special economic zone in the Kaliningrad region, on ratification of
an agreement between the governments of Russia and Armenia for
encouragement and mutual protection of capital investments, and on
ratification of an agreement between the governments of Russia and
the Republic of Yemen for encouragement and mutual protection of
capital investments. Economy minister German Gref will deliver a
report on the issues. The government is also expected to handle the
law on state registration of municipal establishments.

Furthermore, the cabinet will discuss the issue of appropriating
money from the government’s reserve fund to the culture ministry and
from the government’s reserve fund for prevention and liquidation of
emergencies and consequences of natural disasters to the government
of the Chechen Republic and administration of the Kaliningrad region.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Haigazian: David Barsamian lectures at Haigazian University

PRESS RELEASE
Mira Yardemian
Public Relations Director
Haigazian University
Rue Mexique – Kantari
P.O. Box 11-1748
Riad El-Solh 1107 2090
Beirut – Lebanon

David Barsamian lectures at Haigazian University:
Breaking Media Monopoly

“Information is central for a good functioning Democracy” said
Mr. Barsamian, an American freethinking activist, founder and director of
“Alternative Radio” that broadcast independent and award winning weekly
series, based in Boulder, Colorado,
During a lecture organized by the Heritage Club, on April the
5th , 2005 at Haigazian University, David Barsamian introduced the audience
with the mechanism by which the American Media functions. In fact, 5 big
corporations dominate the US media, which are: AOL, NewsCorp, Disney, GE,
and Viacom. These corporations have direct impact on media agencies, such
as, Time Warner (CNN), Fox, ABC, NBC, and CBS.
Barsamian noted that Information is central for a good
functioning Democracy, and journalism itself needs a broad spectrum of
information, therefore was the need of creating the “Alternative Radio”, a
medium to provide a counter narrative to the news broadcasted by these few
news agencies.
Barsamian named several independent news agencies in the
States, which work with small budgets, yet try to present different points
of view from different perspectives, like Indy Media, Community Radio, Free
Speech TV, Democracy Now, South End Press, and Alternative Radio.
Barsamian is a radio producer, journalist, author, and
lecturer. He co-authored several books with Noam Chomsky, Eqbal Ahmad,
Edward Said and others.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Erdogan exige sinceridad en discusion sobre genocidio armenio

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
April 13, 2005, Wednesday

Erdogan exige sinceridad en discusion sobre genocidio armenio

Ankara

El primer ministro turco, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, abogo hoy por una
mayor sinceridad en la discusion sobre el reconocimiento del
genocidio cometido contra los armenios en Turquia durante la Primera
Guerra Mundial.

“No podemos tomar en serio a quien ve la historia con prejuicios”,
dijo Erdogan ante diputados de su partido Justicia y Desarrollo (AKP)
en Ankara.

Esta tarde (local) se discutira el genocidio de los armenios en la
Asamblea Nacional (Parlamento). Los comentarios de Erdogan demuestran
que aunque Turquia sigue negando categoricamente las acusaciones,
ahora esta preparada para al menos discutir el asunto.

El 24 de abril se cumple el 90 anirversario del comienzo de la
violencia que, segun los armenios, resulto en la muerte de alrededor
de 1,5 millones de personas. Turquia admite que cientos de miles de
armenios que vivian en lo que era el Imperio Otomano muriero, pero
afirma que la mayoria de estas muertes tuvieron lugar durante una
deportacion masiva de armenios que coincidio con la invasion del
ejercito ruso.

Turquia ha negado siempre las acusaciones de genocidio, y solo
recientemente se ha permitido a los propios turcos poner en duda la
version oficial, incluso aunque siga considerandose antipatriotico
hacerlo.

Asi lo vivio el autor mas famoso del pais, Orhan Pamuk, quien dijo
haber sufrido amenazas de muerte tras decir a una revista suiza que
un millon de armenios fueron asesinados en Turquia. Un vicegobernador
turco ordeno la retirada de las librerias y bibliotecas de todas las
obras de Pamuk.

En la historia de Turquia no existe ningun capitulo “del que nos
avergoncemos, que reprimamos, olvidemos o que tratemos de maquillar”,
aseguro Erdogan. “No tenemos ningun complejo respecto a nuestra
historia”. Ademas, insto a aquellos que van a Turquia “siempre con la
misma cantinela” a “repasar su propia historia y ser sinceros con su
veracidad”. Nadie tiene el poder suficiente para “llenar de mentiras
la historia de Turquia”, afirmo.

Erdogan subrayo ademas que los documentos turcos estan dispuestos
para todos aquellos “que buscan la verdad en la historia”. Hace
tiempo que Erdogan abogo por la creacion de comisiones
internacionales de historiadores. En cuanto esten listos los
resultados de estas comisiones, Turquia esta “dispuesta a tomar las
medidas que alli se digan”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Sezer off to Syria as FM undersecretary begins trip to US

IPR Strategic Business Information Database
April 14, 2005

PRESIDENT OFF TO SYRIA AS FOREIGN MINISTRY UNDERSECRETARY BEGINS TRIP
TO US

According to Turkiye, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer’ds controversial
visit to Syria is set to begin. During his contacts, Sezer is
expected to discuss international developments with his Syrian
counterpart Bashar Assad and express his satisfaction at the
withdrawal of Syrian troops from Lebanon. At the same time, Foreign
Ministry Undersecretary Ali Tuygan, accompanied by a delegation, will
travel to Washington to hold a series of contacts with top American
officials. Armenian genocide allegations, the Iran issue, as well as
bilateral ties are expected to dominate the talks. The Cyprus issue
will also be discussed. Tuygan will also urge US officials to end the
international isolation of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
(TRNC).

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Captured Time

The Warsaw Voice
April 13, 2005

CAPTURED TIME

A new photo exhibition is on display at the Center for Contemporary
Art (CSW). It presents the work of Mexican photographer Flor Garduno,
born in 1957. Garduno studied art at the San Carlos Academy in
Mexico. For two years she was an assistant to photographer Manuel
Alvarez Bravo. Garduno has worked as an independent photographer
since 1980, displaying her work in numerous galleries and museums in
Mexico, the United States and Europe (exhibitions in Paris, London
and Zurich).

The CSW presents one of her most beautiful projects, the series
Testigos del tiempo (Witnesses of Time). This is a documentary of
human life outside large urban centers, a record of local people and
their ceremonies. The pictures were taken in the years 1983-1991. In
terms of subject matter, the exhibition resembles the brilliant film
Seasons by Armenian director Artavazd Peleshian, recently shown at
the CSW.

Garduno’s photographs are very rich in form, while Peleshian is
slightly more economical with respect to expression. “Garduno
photographs life, religious ceremonies and social events from a
distance, with great care for composition and balance in the picture,
irrespective of whether she shows the real world of the poor or
whether her photos depict landscape, architecture or nature. She
achieves this through very sophisticated but-just like
Peleshian-economical means, in which light and composition play the
most important role,” said the curator of the exhibition.

Mexican photography is highly praised internationally, in large part
thanks to the late Manuel Alvarez Bravo, its most eminent
representative and Garduno’s mentor. Many other outstanding Mexican
photographers have made names for themselves in the past 50
years-including Garduno. Her art focuses on South American
countries-her native Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador,
Bolivia-regions with which she feels the strongest emotional and
cultural affinity.

The exhibition Testigos del tiempo enjoys enormous popularity
worldwide and has already been presented in 35 museums, including the
Art Institute of Chicago, the Center of Creative Photography in
Tuscon, fine art museums in Mexico, Chile and Argentina, the Musee de
l’Elysee in Lausanne and Salamanca University, Spain. In Warsaw, the
exhibition will be shown through the end of May.

Center for Contemporary Art, Ujazdowski Castle, 6 Ujazdowskie Ave.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress