Web Designer Helps the World Remember

Web Designer Helps the World Remember

Website lists Genocide commemorative events

Glendale Independent
April 14, 2005 – April 20, 2005

By Nimfa Rueda, Glendale Independent Weekly Editor

Armen Vartanian’s 100-year old grandmother, Lucy was 10 years old when 1.5
million Armenians were said to have been killed by Ottoman Turks. Armen
Vartanian grew up hearing stories about the genocide, and also learned about
it in his history classes.

It greatly frustrates him that the Turkish government continues to refuse to
recognize the genocide, and also that it has not yet been fully recognized
here in the United States.

So three years ago, the 20-year-old web designer did what he does best:
create a website, where events commemorating the genocide all over the world
can be publicized.

“I feel that it is my duty to my community,” said Vartanian, who graduated
from Crescenta Valley High School. “People should not forget (the genocide)
and man’s inhumanity against man.”

The website , which started with a listing of Los
Angeles events, had a slow start in 2003.

“It took a while for people to know about the site,” he said. The following
year, the site started listing national and even international events.

This year, the 90th anniversary of the genocide, the response has increased
dramatically, Vartanian said. Now, the website is so comprehensive it even
includes video clips about the genocide from broadcast news sources.

Increased interest in the website, however, also meant attracting the bad
guys. Vartanian, who runs a web design business on Broadway, had to deal
with hackers.

“They tried to redirect the site to websites that say the genocide never
happened,” he said.

“They resort to hacking because they know they’re losing the battle. The
genocide will soon get its much-deserved recognition.”

Vartanian said they not only want recognition from Turkey and the United
States, but also “restitution” or the return of historical Armenian land and
property to the Armenian people.

To view the most current listing of Genocide commemorative events, visit

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.genocideevents.com
www.genocideevents.com

Armenian opposition positive about relations with NATO

Armenian opposition positive about relations with NATO

Mediamax news agency
15 Apr 05

YEREVAN

Representatives of political forces represented in the Armenian
parliament are positive about the deepening of relations between
Armenia and NATO.

The leader of the United Labour Party (ULP), Gurgen Arsenyan, said
today that “rapprochement with NATO meets Armenian interests”. Asked
by our parliamentary correspondent, he said that the ULP supported
Armenia’s full membership of the security system in the Euro-Atlantic
area.

The leader of the Dashnaktsutyun parliamentary faction, Levon
Lazarian, hailed the Individual Partnership Action Plan [IPAP]
between Armenia and NATO, noting that he considered this process in
the contexts of Armenia’s complementary foreign policy. At the same
time, he said that “it was too early” to talk about Armenia and other
South Caucasus countries’ full membership of NATO.

The secretary of the opposition Justice bloc, Viktor Dallakyan, said
today that “the three countries of the South Caucasus were doomed to
becoming members of a single security system which is most likely to
be NATO”.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA:A Bird’s Eye View

A Bird’s Eye View

TDN
Sunday, April 17, 2005

OPINIONS

Advena AVIS

We birds were very saddened by the passing away of the pope. He was a
fantastic human who had contributed greatly to humanity. May his soul
rest in peace. We were also quite impressed by the list of
dignitaries that were present at his funeral. Almost all the human
leaders of the world were present. But the most impressive delegation
was that of Turkey. According to the list on theCNN Web site, the
Turkish delegation was headed by the prime minister and included a
state minister, Greek Orthodox Patriarch Bartolomeos and Armenian
Patriarch Mesrob II. The fact that a Muslim prime minister includes
two Christian patriarchs in his delegation is a good example of an
open society and of an administration that is trying to put past
differences into the dustbin of history. Only Lebanon followed
Turkey’s example and included representatives of Christian churches in
its delegation. So bravo, Erdogan man, for a job well done.

As we birds circulate in the streets of Istanbul looking for food,
weoften find metal screws lying here and there. And we ponder deeply
on them. Have you humans ever thought that the screw is the basic
element that holds your technological civilization together? Without
screws you would not have automobiles, airplanes, trains, ships,
telephones, modern dwellings, agricultural machines, refrigerators,
etc., and we could continue with a list of thousand of items in whose
production screws are used.

But what is a screw? According to the definition given by the
Wikipedia encyclopedia, “a screw is a shaft with a helical groove
formed on its surface. Its main uses are as a threaded fastener used
to hold objects together, andas a simple machine used to translate
torque into linear force.”

The screw has been around since antiquity. The Greek human
mathematician Archytas of Tarentum (428-350 B.C) was credited with the
invention of the screw. By the first century B.C. wooden screws were
commonly used throughout the Mediterranean world in devices such as
oil and wine presses. Metal screws did not appear in Europe until the
1400s.The metal screw did not become a common woodworking fastener
until machine tools for mass production were developedat the end of
the 18th century. It should also be mentioned that Archimedes of
Syracuse invented the water screw, which lifted water from wells.

While you humans use the screw to maintain and develop your
technological civilization, you still lag behind Mother Nature, who
can construct humans, animals, plants, etc. without the use of
screws. So when we see screws thathave fallen off automobiles or from
other items lying around in the streets, we begin to worry. The more
screws we see, the more we become concerned about the fate and safety
of the vehicle from which it fell off, for the passengers of that
vehicle and, why not, about the future of human civilization, since
these loose screws indicate that your technological civilization is
slowly unraveling. We cannot also understand why such an important
element is used as a curse word in English (the verb). So dear humans,
next time you see a screw in the street, pick it up and ponder the
role that it has played and continues to play in your civilization.

Good things are happening in our neighboring country Greece as far
asour species is concerned. The Greek Center for the Care of Wild
Animals recently released into freedom a pelican, six storks, a gray
heron, two peregrine falcons and four other hawks near the banks of
the Aliakmon River. Most of the birds had needed treatment after being
shot by hunters. The center’s Thessalonica branch receives up to 1,500
injured animals and birds every year, some 20 percent of which require
short treatment. All this is very encouraging news and we birds would
like to thank you humans for taking such good care of less fortunate
members of our species. We hope the other countries of the regioncan
also follow the Greek example, if they have not already done so.

And we shall end today’s column with another example that is
comically sad, of human folly. We quote from the international
traveler update section of the International Herald Tribune of April
5: “TOKYO: The subway system on Monday began running its first
women-only car during the morning rush hour, a special from 7:30
a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on the Saikyo Line. A women’s car has been in
operation since July 2002 during the evening rush hour on the line,
whose stops include Shinjuku, Japan’s busiest station. A police report
in February said that groping on trains had tripled in the past eight
years and urged the system to add more women-only cars.” It is a shame
for humanity to resort to these kinds of measures in order to prevent
indecent acts that human males inflict on human females. We can only
express the hope that in the other cars, male humans do not resort to
groping each other.

So please, dear humans, ponder our thoughts for the benefit of this
planet.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

NYT: Turkey Says 523,000 Killed by Armenians Between 1910 & 1922

New York Times
April 17 2005

Turkey Says 523,000 Were Killed by Armenians Between 1910 and 1922
By SEBNUM ARSU

Published: April 17, 2005

IZMIR, Turkey, April 17 – The Turkish State Archive issued today a
list of more than 523,000 Turks whom it said were killed by Armenians
in Turkey between 1910 and 1922.

The move appeared intended to counter longstanding Armenian
contentions that Turkish Ottoman officials committed genocide during
a period of mass deportations of Armenians that began in 1915.

Turkey fears that the 90th anniversary of the start of the violence,
which Armenians and their supporters plan to mark on April 24, will
cause widespread anti-Turkish feeling. It is also concerned that the
issue could interfere with its plans to start talks with the European
Union in October for possible membership. There have been growing
calls from other countries for Turkey to acknowledge its role with
regard to the Armenians.

Last week, Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan and the Turkish Parliament
called for an international study of the events of that period, but
senior Armenia officials turned down the proposal.

Turkey flatly denies that there was any systematic effort at killing
or forcing the Armenians out of eastern Anatolia, where the Armenians
were trying to establish a separate state. with support from the
French, British and Russians. Turkey contends that, instead, hundreds
of thousands of Turks were killed by Armenians as they tried to
establish themselves as the majority population in that region. Prof.
Yusuf Sarinay said.

The list issued today was compiled based on reports by the regional
authorities sent to Ottoman officials in Istanbul, as well as the
written accounts of international observers, said Mr. Sarinay, the
director of the Office of State Archives.

“Europe has used Armenians as a tool in extension of their policies
over Turkey, for which Turks and Armenians suffered,” Mr. Sarinay was
quoted as saying by the Anatolian news agency. “Europe should also
face her own history.”

Hirant Dink, a leading figure among Armenians in Turkey called the
list an official attempt to create an alternate version of an
internationally recognized reality. He said that such documentary
analysis and confirmation of its accuracy should be left in the hands
of international academics.

“Figures and documents should be researched and analyzed,” Mr. Dink
said, “However, talking merely in figures means that Turkey doesn’t
understand the pain of the other side; what is undermined here is the
conscience and human factor behind all.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: When silences speak

When silences speak

TDN
Sunday, April 17, 2005

OPINIONS

Opinion by Elif SAFAK

ELIF SAFAK I first heard the word Armenian while eavesdropping on the
conversations of elderly Muslim women. Back when I was a child in
Istanbul, there was a small bakery my grandma would send me to for the
best yufka in the neighborhood. The place was owned by a modest
couple, a short woman who never smiled and her shorter husband who
always did. Coming home from there one day, I found a group of women
in our living room sipping their teas and praising the yufka of this
small bakery as they reached for the pastries. Then I heard one of
them ask, Are these bakers Armenians? My grandma nodded as she said:
But isn’t it obvious? They are such a hard-working couple. One by one
the women shared with each other memories of the Armenians they knew
back in their childhoods in Sivas, Erzurum, Van, Istanbul, etc.

Trying to cross the information I’d just heard with my image of the
bakers in the neighborhood, I had this vision of an insomniac couple
baking all kinds of bread every night in their little shops. The scene
seemed pretty pleasant to me, almost mystical. Eager to learn more
about these people and their ways, I interrupted the chitchat in the
room and asked, who on earth were these Armenians? Since that day, it
is not the answers that remain anchored in my memory but the silence
that followed. I remember the women being somewhat annoyed by my
question, and then, annoyed by my very presence in the room. Although
I had been sitting in front of their eyes for the past half hour, they
had only now taken notice. Suddenly, I had become an outsider.

Recalling that memory, I tend to liken it to a widespread and
deeply-rooted reaction in Turkish daily life concerning the Armenian
question. We can easily converse about the Armenians in the serenity
of our living rooms, we can recall distant memories of a past when we
used to live together with our good old Armenian neighbors, and we can
even be critical of the Turkish state provided there are no outsiders
around. We ourselves, on our own initiative can and do frequently
remember the Armenian neighbors we once had, but we do not like to be
reminded of them. That afternoon in that living room, I couldn’t help
but notice my interruption caused uneasiness and a decline in
enthusiasm among the women to keep talking in the same vein.

There was a nuance that equally remains etched in my memory. Whenever
she uttered the word Armenian, my grandmother lowered her voice
without realizing it — her voice dwindling to an almost confidential
whisper. To this day, Grandma’s intonation changes when she talks
about an Armenian, any Armenian. Clearly, she does not do it
deliberately or malevolently. When I ask her the reason why she cannot
utter this word aloud, she looks back at me in surprise. Does she
lower her voice? Sure she doesn’t.

In the passage of time, I came to realize I was not asking her the
right question. When the word is Armenian, it is not the sound of the
word itself necessarily, but the silence that conveys the uncharted
depths of oral history of elderly Muslim women in Turkey.

I conducted the same test on the women of my mother’s generation and
then the women of mine. The results were somewhat different. Younger
women in Turkey had no real difficulty in pronouncing the word
Armenian aloud, as if it was just any other word for them. They didn’t
have any reason to pause because they didn’t have any particular story
to tell. They didn’t have any particular story to tell because they
had no common experience with Armenians. Somehow, somewhere, a body of
knowledge was lost between generations of women. Thus, those who were
young and didn’t know much were the ones who would speak, but, didn’t
have anything personal to tell. Those who were old and had something
personal to tell were the ones that kept quiet, and as such, their
stories could not be heard. In either case, the Armenian question
remained unspeakable.

History does not only mean written and documented history. History is
also oral history. The elderly women in Turkey remember the things
Turkish nationalist historians cannot possibly bear to hear. In almost
every household in Turkey today, there is a woman of my grandmother’s
generation. The crucial question is: how can we ever bring that
experience out? How can we decode the silence? It is my belief that if
we are to look into the dusk of the past and shed light on the
atrocities we Turks have allegedly committed against the Armenians, we
should not only focus on the archives or written documents, but also
pay attention to the unwritten volumes of women’s oral histories.

We need to listen to the suppressed memories of the Turkish
grandmothers. For, unlike the Turkish nationalists who keep reacting
against every critical voice in civil society by systematically
propagating collective amnesia, these elderly women do remember.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Patriarchate Disapproves Of Fr. Kalayjian’s Statement

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
LRAPER Church Bulletin
Armenian Patriarchate
TR-34130 Kumkapý, Istanbul
Licensee: The Revd. Fr. Drtad Uzunyan
Editors: The Revd. Archpriest Krikor Damatyan,
The Revd. Deacon Vagarsag Seropyan
Press Officer: Attorney Mrs. Luiz Bakar
T: +90 (212) 517-0970
F: +90 (212) 516-4833
[email protected]
[email protected]

<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><

PATRIARCHATE DISAPPROVES OF FR. KALAYJIAN’S STATEMENT

ISTANBUL (Lraper Church Bulletin, 15/04/2005) – In a press communiqué
released by the press office of the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul,
attorney Mrs. Luiz Bakar stated that the Chancellery of the Patriarchate has
taken note of numerous articles in the Turkish press concerning the remarks
of the Revd. Fr. Vertanes Kalayjian of Washington about the founder of the
Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

According to news widely circulated in Turkey, Fr. Kalayjian called Ataturk
`a butcher’ during the United States Helsinki Commission briefing on
Religious Freedom in Turkey, held at the Rayburn House in Washington on 12
April 2005.

The transcripts of the briefing released by the Commission state Fr.
Kalayjian as saying: `Something very drastic happened. And that was the
disintegration of the Ottoman Empire. And with that, unfortunately, the
paranoid attitude of the leaders, both sultans and the successive Ittihad
and Terakki Party and their successor, Kemal, who is now being regarded as a
hero, was another butcher, if you ask me’.

Representing the Armenian Patriarchate of Istanbul, press spokesperson Mrs.
Bakar said, `The priest who has uttered these words is not a member of the
Armenian community in Turkey, and has no ties with either the Armenian
Patriarchate or the Armenian Church in Turkey. Regardless of who has uttered
that word, one should question his grasp of history. The military and
political genius of the founder of the Turkish Republic renders all sorts of
accusations meaningless and void. A look at the geographical situation of
Turkey within her present borders should be more than sufficient to
understand and to evaluate Ataturk. We disapprove of Fr. Kalayjian’s mode of
speech, and presume that such sorties do not help in the efforts being made
as regards the Turkish-Armenian dialogue’.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.lraper.org

Armenia says OSCE report on Nagorno-Karabakh won’t reduce tensions

Armenia says OSCE report on Nagorno-Karabakh won’t reduce tensions

AP Worldstream
Apr 17, 2005

Armenia reacted negatively to an OSCE report on the tense situation in
the disputed enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, saying didn’t take enough
notice of cease-fire violations by Azerbaijan.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Gamlet Gasparyan on Saturday repeated his
country’s assertions that Azerbaijan was responsible for continued
violations along the enclave’s front lines. He said the OSCE report,
released Friday by the organization’s so-called Minsk Group, should
have done more to underscore that.

The OSCE report voiced concerns about growing tensions and cease-fire
violations and called on all sides to refrain from inflammatory public
statements.

“The noticeable caution by the co-chairmen (in the report) … will
not promote the preservation of the cease-fire regime,” Gasparyan
said. “We expect that the co-chairmen and those interested in
preserving stability in the region will take more decisive steps.”

Azerbaijan, which has not reacted publicly to the report, blames
Armenia and Karabakh Armenians for stoking tensions.

Nagorno-Karabakh is a mountainous region inside Azerbaijan that has
been under the control of ethnic Armenians since the early 1990s,
following fighting that killed an estimated 30,000 people. A
cease-fire was signed in 1994, but the enclave’s final political
status has not been determined and shooting breaks out frequently
between the two sides, which face off across a demilitarized buffer
zone.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Their families’ stories keep Armenia alive

Their families’ stories keep Armenia alive

Armenian-Americans in Rhode Island will mark the anniversary of the
1915 genocide with a candlelight march, a night of music and stories,
and a youth day.

01:00 AM EDT on Sunday, April 17, 2005

BY ELIZABETH GUDRAIS
Journal Staff Writer

Atrocities. Great misfortune. Tragic events. To Armenians, they are
nothing more than euphemisms.

“Every time somebody denies that the genocide happened, it’s like
perpetrating the crime against the victims all over again,” says
Pauline Getzoyan, a Lincoln resident helping to organize the 90th
anniversary commemoration of the 1915 Armenian genocide.

Armenians remember their collective grief each April 24, with bigger
commemorations on 10-year anniversaries. This year will probably be
the last 10-year marker that includes firsthand survivors’ stories.

Getzoyan’s grandmother, Margaret DerManuelian, is already gone. She
died in 2002. So Getzoyan will tell her story. At the commemoration on
Saturday, Getzoyan will don her grandmother’s shawl, take up her
black-veined turquoise worry beads, and tell a story so horrific her
grandmother didn’t speak of it for years.

Getzoyan will recount how in 1915, DerManuelian, then a 6-year-old
living in the Ottoman sanjak, or district, of Palu, discovered her
father’s dead body, decapitated by Ottoman soldiers.

Next weekend’s events are about remembering, but they’re also about
getting recognition. Getzoyan, who is 43 and teaches fourth grade at
Central Elementary in Lincoln, co-organized a symposium at Rhode
Island College in March, to guide teachers in adding genocide
education to their curriculum. She is part of the Armenian National
Committee, which lobbies Congress and the president to recognize that
the word genocide applies to the Armenian killings of 1915. An
estimated 1.5 million Armenians perished at Ottoman hands.

Some countries, including France, Switzerland and Greece, have
officially recognized the Ottoman killing of Armenians in 1915 as
genocide. Turkey and the United States are not among those countries.

ARMENIANS REMEMBER April 24, 1915, as the day the genocide started. On
that day, more than 200 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders
were killed in Constantinople.

This year, April 24 falls on a Sunday. Many of Rhode Island’s
estimated 10,000 Armenian-Americans will go to New York City for
commemoration events in Times Square. Providence will have its own
event, at the North Burial Ground on North Main Street, at a monument
with the skull of an unidentified 12-year-old Armenian boy sealed
inside.

The skull, recovered from the Der-el-Zor desert in what is now Syria,
may seem a morbid symbol. But that’s the point. Ninety years later,
the genocide “still has the power to shock us,” says Adam Strom, a
scholar who will speak at the ceremony.

Strom, the principal writer and editor of Crimes Against Humanity and
Civilization: The Genocide of the Armenians, a resource book for
teachers, is on staff at Facing History and Ourselves, a Brookline,
Mass.-based organization that creates teaching aids and provides
guidance on “questions of tolerance and social responsibility,” in
Strom’s words.

Strom believes recognizing the Armenian genocide is crucial to help
Armenians and to prevent future atrocities.

Acknowledgement is the first step in learning history’s lessons, he
says.

“How can you approach history so it doesn’t become a weapon in a new
war?” Strom says. “So often, history becomes a call for revenge.”

GREGORY CHOPOORIAN’S grandfather struggled with that very question.

His grandfather survived being forcibly marched through the Der-el-Zor
desert. What haunted him most, he would later tell his family, was the
sight of a man forced to watch his pregnant wife impaled on a
stake. Chopoorian, 42, of Cumberland, said his grandfather “would,
toward the end of his life, say, ‘What are we going to do? We can’t do
the same thing to them. We’ll be just like them.’ ”

Chopoorian, who works as an administrator at the Mansion Nursing Home
in Central Falls, has published articles on Armenian costumes, rugs
and material culture. As a consultant for Ararat, a 2002 film by
Armenian-Canadian director Atom Egoyan, Chopoorian worked with the set
designer and costume designer to ensure accuracy.

For Saturday’s commemoration evening at Rhode Island College,
Chopoorian will narrate vignettes about the six provinces of historic
Armenia.

The borders of the modern Armenian state, a former Soviet republic,
were established by the USSR. While small, Armenia is larger than
Israel and Lebanon combined. But the area Armenians claim as their
historic homeland extends some 300 miles west from Mount Ararat into
modern-day Turkey.

The 16,854-foot peak was the landing site of Noah’s Ark, according to
the Christian tradition Armenians hold dear.

It grates on Armenians that Mount Ararat itself is in eastern Turkey,
close enough to the border to be visible from Armenia.

“Our sacred mountain has been stolen from us,” Chopoorian says,
holding up a calendar photo of Ararat looming white against a vivid
blue sky.

An exchange from Ararat, the movie, encapsulates the way the debate
plays out between modern-day Turks and Armenians.

“Lots of people died. It was World War I,” Elias Koteas’ character, an
actor with Turkish ancestry, tells Raffi, a young Armenian-American
man struggling to understand his heritage.

“Turkey wasn’t at war with Armenia,” Raffi replies, “just like Germany
wasn’t at war with the Jews.” Armenians “were Turkish citizens,” he
continues. “They had a right to protection.”

The film is about the Armenian genocide, but also about how we tell
history, and how each retelling is necessarily imperfect because it’s
based on one person’s understanding.

The Turkish minister of culture called the film “propaganda” and
accused Egoyan of distorting history. Miramax chairman Harvey
Weinstein, determined to distribute the film in the U.S., accused the
Turkish government of “denying history.”

A particularly venomous thread of discussion on one movie Web site
centers on an oft-quoted statement attributed to Adolf Hitler on the
eve of invading Poland: “Be merciless in exterminating Polish men,
women and children. Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation
of the Armenians?”

Turks and their defenders dispute that Hitler ever said this.

Three years after Ararat’s release, postings still fly back and forth
on the Internet.

Armenians don’t hate Turks, Chopoorian insists. They understand the
Turkish government’s objection to connecting modern-day Turkey with
the deeds of the Ottoman Empire. They just want recognition.

“How can you destroy an entire nation of people and not deal with it?”
he asks.

It’s imperative that Armenians act while there are still survivors,
says Joyce Yeremian, chairwoman of the Armenian Martyrs’ Memorial
Committee of Rhode Island, which planned the commemoration events.

Once the survivors are gone, “it’s just history,” says Yeremian, 64, a
North Providence resident whose grandfather, 14 years old in 1915,
survived an attempt by Ottoman forces to drown him in the Euphrates.

NEW ENGLAND’S earliest Armenian immigrant community sprang up in
Worcester in the 1890s, when Armenians fled the persecution of Sultan
Abdul-Hamid II. They came to work in the mills and sent money home.

In 1915, many served as sponsors for relatives still in
Armenia. Providence’s Armenians settled on Smith Hill. St. Sahag &
St. Mesrob Armenian Apostolic Church was the community’s
centerpiece. Two more Armenian churches, Sts. Vartanantz on Broadway
and Euphrates Evangelical on Franklin Street, followed.

Today, the state’s 10,000 or so Armenian-Americans have spread out,
with enclaves in Cranston and North Providence. St. Sahag & St. Mesrob
“is no longer a community church,” says its pastor, the Rev. Simeon
Odabashian. “Everybody drives here. Nobody walks.”

But with its eight-sided tower, blue neon-lit cross and Armenian flag
— striped red, blue and orange — visible from Route 95, St. Sahag &
St. Mesrob is still a gathering place for Rhode Island’s Armenians.

Inside, the greeting parev, Armenian for hello, echoes as people
arrive for a meeting to plan commemoration events.

The events begin Tuesday, with Armenian Youth Day at the Egavian
Cultural Center, adjacent to St. Sahag & St. Mesrob Church at 70
Jefferson St. The 10th annual youth day will feature Armenian crafts
and cooking classes, and a chance to meet survivors of the genocide.

On Friday at 7, a candlelight march is planned from Sts. Vartanantz
Church, 402 Broadway, to the State House.

Saturday evening’s event at Rhode Island College’s Roberts Hall starts
at 7 and is free and open to the public. The Rhode Island Philharmonic
Youth Orchestra will play the music of composer Aram Khatchaturian.

Pauline Getzoyan will perform her Vignette of an Armenian
Mother. Gregory Chopoorian will tell about the six provinces,
accompanied by David Ayriyan on the kemancha, a traditional string
instrument. Armenian and English poems and a performance by the
Armenian Chorale of Rhode Island, directed by St. Sahag & St. Mesrob
Church music director Konstantin Petrossian, will round out the
evening.

The next afternoon, at 12:30 at the North Burial Ground, a civil
ceremony will include Adam Strom’s speech.

THERE IS a chilling sameness about the Armenians’ stories of genocide.

Men closed in churches and burned to death. Girls who ended up in
orphanages, or working as servants for Turkish families. Babies thrown
into the Tigris and the Euphrates rather than have them grabbed by
Ottoman soldiers.

Armenians will gather next weekend for the memory of Pauline
Getzoyan’s grandmother, and Joyce Yeremian’s grandfather, and Gregory
Chopoorian’s grandfather, and hundreds of thousands more who didn’t
survive.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Le tabou armenien a la vie dure en Turquie

Libération , France
15 avril 2005

Le tabou arménien a la vie dure en Turquie

DURAN Ragip

Ankara propose une commission mixte d’historiens turcs et arméniens
pour enquêter sur le génocide de 1915.

Istanbul de notre correspondant

Les plus optimistes y voient un prudent premier pas de la Turquie
pour régler officiellement ses comptes avec la partie la plus sombre
de son histoire. Le Premier ministre turc, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, issu
du mouvement islamiste, a proposé, dans un message à son homologue
arménien, Robert Kotcharian, l’instauration d’une commission mixte
composée d’historiens turcs et arméniens afin d’enquêter sur les
massacres de centaines de milliers d’Arméniens, en 1915, qu’Ankara se
refuse toujours à qualifier de génocide.

L’initiative paraît néanmoins être surtout une manoeuvre pour
désamorcer les critiques occidentales qui appellent de plus en plus
fermement Ankara à ce “travail de mémoire” alors que les négociations
d’adhésion à l’UE devraient commencer en octobre prochain.
“L’administration turque est coincée car elle veut poursuivre son
processus d’accès à l’Union européenne alors que les lobbies
arméno-occidentaux font monter la pression à la veille des
commémorations du 90e anniversaire de ces événements tragiques”,
estime le professeur d’histoire Halil Berktay, de l’université
Sabançi, une des rares personnalités turques, avec Taner Akçam,
spécialiste du problème arménien, qui contestent la thèse officielle.
Les massacres et les déportations d’Arméniens, entre 1915 et 1917,
ont fait entre 1,2 et 1,3 million de morts, selon les Arméniens, et
300 000 selon les Turcs.

“Nouvelle stratégie”. Occultée pendant quatre-vingt-dix ans par
l’histoire officielle, la mémoire arménienne a ressurgi en Turquie au
travers de livres et d’expositions. Mais si la société civile bouge
sur cette question, les autorités restent beaucoup plus timorées. Le
vice-Premier ministre et ministre des Affaires étrangères, Abdullah
Gül, avait pourtant annoncé mercredi une campagne tous azimuts et
“une nouvelle stratégie”, redoutant que le Congrès américain adopte
une résolution qualifiant ces événements de génocide. Les députés de
la Grande Assemblée nationale, réunis en session extraordinaire, se
sont mis d’accord sur un texte commun. “La raison et la logique
imposent que la Turquie et l’Arménie ne craignent pas de briser les
tabous dans une initiative commune […]. C’est le moyen d’éviter que
notre passé n’assombrisse notre présent et notre avenir”, affirme ce
document, qui, pour l’essentiel, réaffirme les thèses classiques
d’Ankara : il n’y a pas eu de génocide, une commission mixte
d’historiens de Turquie et d’Arménie doit étudier leurs archives
respectives et celles d’autres pays, et Ankara condamne fermement les
parlements des pays qui reconnaissent le génocide de 1915.

“Au-delà de l’effet d’annonce, il n’y a aucune nouveauté dans la
position turque”, observe un journaliste de l’hebdomadaire arménien
d’Istanbul Agos, précisant qu'”il ne s’agit pas d’un débat mais d’une
déclaration unilatérale qui avoue l’entêtement et les embarras
d’Ankara”. En effet, Abdullah Gül, qui a facilement adopté le ton
officiel devant le parlement, a réfuté en bloc l’existence d’un
génocide, estimant que “la Turquie était fière de son histoire”. Le
numéro 2 du gouvernement turc a aussi précisé que “l’ouverture de la
frontière et de l’espace aérien ainsi que le développement des
relations commerciales turco-arméniennes dépendaient de l’abandon,
par Erevan, de ses thèses falsifiant l’histoire”.

Encore plus catégoriques ont été hier les propos du président du
Centre d’études stratégiques et historiques de l’armée turque, le
général Erdogan Karakus, rappelant que l’ensemble des archives de
l’état-major, couvrant la période de 1914-1918, est ouvert depuis
1984 : “La totalité des documents et des correspondances des
autorités civiles et militaires de cette époque seront publiés en
quatre volumes. Quand vous les lirez, vous allez bien comprendre qui
a fait le génocide contre qui.” Le nationalisme monte en flèche
depuis quelques mois, notamment contre l’Union européenne, accusée de
“soutenir les terroristes kurdes et d’encourager les partisans du
génocide arménien”. Une atmosphère qui rend difficile un débat vieux
de quatre-vingt-dix ans.

Condition préalable. La reconnaissance du génocide arménien de 1915
par une dizaine de pays, dont la France, avait provoqué un choc. La
République turque, créée sept ans après la tragédie, n’a toujours pas
réussi à se situer par rapport à ce lourd héritage. Toutefois, les
Arméniens de Turquie restent pour la plupart hostiles aux
revendications de la diaspora, exigeant la reconnaissance du génocide
comme condition préalable à une adhésion turque à l’UE. Etyen
Mahçupyan, journaliste arménien d’Istanbul, avec Hirant Dink,
directeur d’Agos, et l’historien Taner Akçam font actuellement la
tournée des capitales européennes pour expliquer ce point de vue :
“La population turque n’a pas encore pris pleinement conscience du
problème et, dans un tel contexte, imposer une solution ne peut que
susciter des réactions hostiles.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Refugee aid breeds resentment in Azerbaijan

Agence France Presse — English
April 16, 2005 Saturday 3:03 AM GMT

Refugee aid breeds resentment in Azerbaijan

by Simon Ostrovsky

KURDAMIR, Azerbaijan April 16

Already too dark indoors, a few old men sat outside a ramshackle
teahouse to catch the last rays of the afternoon sun as they played
dominoes in this dusty town in central Azerbaijan.

“There hasn’t been any electricity in the whole neighborhood for
seven hours,” complained one, “nowhere except there,” he added,
gesturing at a rickety apartment block inhabited by refugees from the
Nagorny-Karabakh war.

Hundreds of thousands of Azeri refugees from a conflict that erupted
in last days of the Soviet Union still live in destitute housing and
camps scattered around the republic.

But the regular aid that they receive both from the government and
foreign aid agencies has stoked resentment in the poor communities to
which they have been resettled.

“They get a lot of help and we get nothing,” said 75-year-old Gara,
who said his 24 US dollars a month pension was only enough to cover
energy and water costs, but left little for food.

A regular supply of free electricity is just one of the benefits that
ordinary residents in Kurdamir wish they could share.

In an area where jobs are scarce and pensions low, they say the food
aid refugees receive, as well as tax benefits and a clean water
supply mean life is easier for those who fled their homes more than a
decade ago.

Azerbaijan will spend 60 million US dollars on aid to refugees this
year and foreign aid groups are expected to pitch in an additional 30
million US dollars according to the government.

And though billions of US dollars have been invested into the Caspian
nation as a BP-led consortium prepares to launch a massive pipeline
to deliver oil from here to Western markets, nearly half of the
country lives below the poverty line.

Azerbaijan and its rival Armenia fought a bloody war for Karabakh, a
predominantly Armenian enclave within Azerbaijan’s internationally
recognized borders until a ceasefire was signed in 1994.

Pro-Armenian forces won control of Karabakh and seven surrounding
regions at the cost of about 25,000 dead from both sides. About a
million people on both sides, 750,000 of them Azeris, were driven
from their homes.

And though conditions in the camps remain poor, aid groups have begun
to indicate that in poverty-stricken Azerbaijan, there is more
suffering outside the camps than inside.

More than 90 percent of refugees consume acceptable amounts of food,
but according to a recent study by the World Food Program (WFP) up to
600,000 ordinary people in rural areas are “food insecure” causing
malnutrition mainly among children.

“It is an issue which needs to be addressed. Twenty four percent of
children in some areas are stunted and suffer from malnutrition,”
said Rahman Chowdhury, WFP director in Azerbaijan.

Meanwhile the aid refugees receive, which is sometimes in excess of
their needs, is sold on to local residents, according to a Peace
Corps volunteer who works with refugee and local children in
Kurdamir.

As she sat by candlelight because of a power cut, Lisa Min said there
was “less resentment than you would expect,” between the two
communities, but goods like vegetable oil given to refugees in large
quantities often find their way onto the market.

Instead of taking steps to integrate refugees into communities and
invest money into developing towns, Azerbaijan’s government has done
everything to make sure refugees stay in camps, against the advice of
aid agencies.

“We want them to live in concentration so that when the occupied
territories are liberated it will be easier to move them back in,”
Azerbaijan’s Deputy Prime Minister Ali Hasanov told AFP.

The high level of government support that they receive is designed to
create incentives for the refugees to stay put, Hasanov said, but it
has also given grounds for jealousy from their impoverished
neighbors.

With Armenia and Azerbaijan no closer to reaching a lasting
settlement than they were when the tense ceasefire was reached,
humanitarian organizations have pushed the government to look at
other options.

According to the WFP’s Chowdhury, “living in the camps is not ideal,
not for a long time, they do not have opportunities to work outside
and this causes grievances and tensions,” with the local communities.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress