The Constitutional Court did not examine the issue concerning Judge Seda Safaryan, Aysor.am was informed by the Constitutional Court’s Department of External Relations.

“The Armenia bloc’s motion regarding Seda Safaryan was not subject to examination, as none of the Constitutional Court judges raised the issue,” the Constitutional Court stated.

According to Article 16, Part 3 of the Law on the Constitutional Court, the issue of a Constitutional Court judge’s inability to participate in the examination of a case may be raised by any Constitutional Court judge. Only in such a case is the matter examined. This procedure was applied in the cases of Judges Vladimir Vardanyan and Artak Zeynalyan.

Thus, Safaryan will participate in the hearing on the challenge to the election results, which is scheduled for Friday.

It should be noted that Constitutional Court judges Artak Zeynalyan and Vladimir Vardanyan will not participate in the examination of the election dispute. According to the Constitutional Court, their participation is impossible due to a biased attitude toward the parties involved in the proceedings.

Vladimir Vardanyan was appointed to the Constitutional Court from the Civil Contract faction, while Artak Zeynalyan, prior to his appointment as a judge, was a member of Aram Sargsyan’s Republic party.

It should also be noted that the cases filed by the seven political forces challenging the results of the parliamentary elections have been consolidated and will be examined in a single proceeding.

The hearing will take place on June 26, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. Constitutional Court Judge Edgar Shatiryan has been appointed rapporteur in the case, and the consolidated proceedings will be conducted through an oral hearing.