A war took place, as a result of which we were defeated. It has been so with many states and nations. But who took the theses of the enemy and applied them, who edited his own history in a way that suited the enemy?

And it’s not like we ask ourselves questions, we try to face the reality as they try to present it. If you look at what anti-Armenian theses were propagated in Azerbaijan before the 44-day war, you will understand that these are not the issues we raised, it’s just that today the RA authorities, with their propagandists, are trying to instill those Azerbaijani theses into our compatriots.

When you see Pashinyan being applauded after his speech in the European Parliament, don’t forget that many people applauded in Strasbourg, but nothing was ever decided by that.

The people applauding think that the leader of a country trying to transform his nation is giving a speech. They do not know that this person leaves his nation defenseless before the enemy.

They applauded a man who had gone to protest against his own nation.

In general, when the leader of a state is widely and unanimously praised by the leaders and parliaments of other countries, it often means that the leader is not acting in the interests of his country, but in the interests of the states from which the words of praise are spoken.

I don’t want them to applaud us. I want us not to lose our national pride.

Edmon Marukyan, head of the “Lusavore Armenia” party

—