Sleeping with Our Enemy: Russia Sells Weapons to Azerbaijan

Sleeping with Our Enemy: Russia Sells Weapons to Azerbaijan

HETQ Armenia: Investigative Journalists
13:08, February 21, 2015
By David Boyajian

Russia has sold some $4 billion worth of modern weapons to Azerbaijan
in the past few years, with perhaps more to come.
These include S-300 air defense missiles, Mi-35Mcombat helicopters,
T-90 tanks, Kornetanti-tank missiles, MSTA-S 152mm self-propelled
artillery, and the highly destructive Smerch Multiple Launch Rocket
System.

Since Azerbaijan’s 1994 defeat in the Karabagh/Artsakh war, its
leaders have declared their intention to seize Artsakh by force.
Azeris regularly shoot across, and try to penetrate, Artsakh’s
ceasefire line. They have made territorial claims on Armenia and are
even shelling villages in Armenia itself.

Armenia and Russia are allies and have a mutual defense pact. Russian
troops help guard Armenia’s border with Turkey. Armenia is Russia’s
only ally in the Caucasus. Why then is Russia supplying sophisticated
weapons to a country that is not just Armenians’ enemy but also
hostile to Russian interests?

Selling to the Enemy

Arms sales generate immediate profit for Russia plus continuing income
from spare parts and future upgrades. The Russian military may also
reason that it knows best how to counter its own weapons should it go
to war with Azerbaijan. Perhaps Russia is embedding secret hardware
and software vulnerabilities into Azeri weapons to disable them should
the need arise.

Russia argues that if it won’t sell weapons to Azerbaijan, other
countries will. Yet Baku has bought arms elsewhere; $1.6 billion worth
from Israel, including Hermes drones and Spike anti-tank missiles, and
significant amounts from Belarus, Turkey, and Ukraine.

By having Azerbaijan partly dependent on Russian weaponry, Moscow
presumes it is co-opting Azeris and making them less likely to join
NATO and supply gas and oil to the West. Are Azeris really that
gullible? Baku could just be buying time until, with Turkey and NATO;
it can strike back at Russia’s vulnerable underbelly.

Is Russia selling arms to Azerbaijan because it is unhappy that
Armenia has cordial relations with the U.S., EU, and NATO? Probably
not. Russia has always found less drastic ways to express its
displeasure, such as increasing its natural gas prices.

But Armenians need not worry, says Russia, because it sells defensive
weapons to Yerevan, reportedly at reduced prices, which neutralize the
offensive ones that Baku buys.

Though Armenians currently hold the military advantage in Artsakh, can
defensive weapons really match Azerbaijan’s offensive ones? And can
Armenia, whose economy is only 13 to 20% of Azerbaijan’s, afford them?
Yerevan may be paying not in cash but rather in factories,
infrastructure, real estate, minerals, and debt. That increases
Russian’s already considerable control over Armenia. And notice that
Russia profits from selling weapons to both sides.

Russian Betrayals

Russia does not, of course, want Azerbaijan (or Turkey) to overrun
Armenia. That would create a pan-Turkic corridor from Turkey to
Azerbaijan. The U.S. and NATO would use it to dominate the Caucasus,
Caspian Sea, and probably Turkic Central Asia.

Artsakh is a different matter. It has no military agreements with
Russia. Indeed, Moscow might not care if Azerbaijan overran Artsakh
since that by itself would not create a pan-Turkic corridor.

Russia might even want a new Artsakh war if it crippled Azerbaijan’s
energy infrastructure and destroyed its gas and oil pipelines that lie
just north of Artsakh’s borders. Or, depending on what Baku gives
Moscow in return, Russia could even help Azerbaijan defeat Artsakh.

After all, post-WW I, Soviet Russia gave Artsakh and Nakhichevan to
Azerbaijan, handed Armenian territory to Turkey, and delivered weapons
to Turkish forces under Kemal Ataturk.

Turkey later turned against Russia and eventually joined NATO, while
Azeris remained hostile to Moscow. Azeris and Turks outsmarted the
Russians.

Some Armenians say that Jewish Bolsheviks, unlike the Russian Orthodox
nationalists who allegedly control Russia now, were mainly responsible
for those disasters.

Nevertheless, arms sales to Azerbaijan and Moscow’s massive trade and
natural gas deals with Turkey remind Armenians of past Russian
betrayals.

Armenia and Artsakh’s Security

To hedge against more Russian betrayals, and for economic, scientific,
educational, and religious-cultural reasons, Armenia understandably
maintains friendly relations with the U.S. and Europe.

Armenia cannot, however, look to the U.S. and NATO for military
security. The latter regard Turkey as not only weightier than Armenia,
but also as the horse on which to gallop into the Caucasus, Caspian,
and beyond. Therefore, Armenia allies itself with Russia. Without
Armenia, of course, Russia will lose the Caucasus and much more to
NATO.

As Moscow aspires to someday be the leader of all Eurasian countries,
it is attempting – in vain, undoubtedly – to lure Turkey and
Azerbaijan away from a Western orientation. Failing that, Russia hopes
such relations will produce short- to medium-term economic and
political gains. For Russia’s own sake, it should examine its past
pro-Turkic missteps.

Armenia and Russia will probably remain in a cycle of mutual need and
suspicion for some time.

As Armenia and Artsakh face the future, therefore, deeper insight into
Russian strategy and intentions is essential.

# # #

David Boyajian is a freelance Armenian American journalist. Many of
his articles are archived at Armeniapedia.org.

http://hetq.am/eng/news/58661/sleeping-with-our-enemy-russia-sells-weapons-to-azerbaijan.html

Starbucks apologises for ‘offensive’ Armenian posters

Tamil Guardian, SriLanka
Feb 21 2015

Starbucks apologises for ‘offensive’ Armenian posters

Tamil Guardian 21 February 2015

The global coffee chain Starbucks has apologised to the Armenian
community and withdrawn a poster campaign that showed women dressed in
traditional Armenian clothing, drinking coffee under the crescent and
star of the Turkish flag.

The Armenian National Committee Of America (ANCA) criticised the
posters which were displayed ahead of the 100th anniversary of the
Armenian genocide, where 1.5 million Armenians were killed by Ottoman
forces. Turkey has refused to recognise the killings as genocide.

“Why is Starbucks selling coffee using an image of women, dressed in
traditional Armenian costumes, celebrating a Turkish state that
systematically victimized Armenian women during the Armenian genocide,
and that still denies this crime against all humanity?” asked ANCA on
Facebook.

“Serving as a place for the community to connect is core to our
business and we strive to be locally relevant in all of our stores,”
said Starbucks in an email to Asbarez. “We missed the mark here and we
apologize for upsetting our customers and the community.”

Starbucks subsequently apologised for the posters and withdrew them
from their stores, adding they would ensure the image would not appear
elsewhere.

The photographer responsible for the image, Timothy Rose, also issued
his “deepest apologies”, saying “once it came to my attention that
this was rightfully offensive to the Armenian community, I took the
image down”.

“I am in full support of their plight and would never have knowingly
supported any action that would hurt either them or cause unnecessary
pain.”

From: Baghdasarian

http://www.tamilguardian.com/article.asp?articleid=13867

Armenian troops kill Azerbaijani soldier: Baku

Peninsula Online, Qatar
Feb 21 2015

Armenian troops kill Azerbaijani soldier: Baku

February 21, 2015 – 6:29:11 pm

Baku—Armenian troops on Saturday killed an Azerbaijani soldier in a
fresh border clash, Azerbaijan officials said, as tensions mounted
over a separatist region.

The soldier “was killed in action as the Armenian forces attempted to
attack Azerbaijani army positions,” the defence ministry in
Azerbaijan’s capital Baku said.

“Armenia’s military and political leadership bears responsibility for
the provocations along the frontline,” the ministry said. “From now
on, our retaliatory measures will be even tougher.”

Azerbaijan and Armenia are locked in a decades-long conflict over
Nagorny Karabakh, an ethnic Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan.

Despite years of negotiations, the two sides have not signed a final
peace deal, with Karabakh internationally recognised as part of
Azerbaijan.

Clashes between Azerbaijani and Armenian forces intensified again in
January following an unprecedented spiral of violence last year.

At least 12 people from both sides were reported killed and 18 wounded
this year in similar incidents on the Armenian-Azerbaijani border, and
along the Karabakh frontline.

Ethnic Armenian separatists backed by Yerevan seized control of
Karabakh during a 1990s war that left some 30,000 dead.

Baku, whose military spending exceeds Armenia’s entire state budget,
has threatened to take back the region by force if negotiations fail
to yield results.

Armenia, which is heavily armed by Russia, says it could crush any offensive.

AFP

http://thepeninsulaqatar.com/news/international/323114/armenian-troops-kill-azerbaijani-soldier-baku

50 Armenian citizens become Russian border guards

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 21 2015

50 Armenian citizens become Russian border guards

21 February 2015 – 6:15pm

50 Armenian citizens have become members of the FSB Border Guards of
Russia in Armenia today in the framework of the intergovernmental
agreement “On the procedure of recruitment and military service of
Armenian citizens in Russian border troops on the territory of the
republic.”

According to the head of the Russian FSB Border Guards, Major General
Vyacheslav Biryukov said there are no incidents on the border between
the countries and that Russia and Armenia have very friendly
relations.

Zaven Qukasyan, writer and historian of Iranian cinema dies

Iran Book News Agency, Iran
Feb 21 2015

Zaven Qukasyan, writer and historian of Iranian cinema dies

Publish Date : Saturday 21 February 2015 – 23:19

IBNA- Zaven Qukasyan, the Iranian-Armenian film writer and historian
of cinema died of stomach cancer in his home in Isfahan yesterday. He
is known as the first film critic in the Iran who wrote books on
single films.

According to IBNA correspondent, he was suffering from stomach cancer
for a long time and had been already hospitalized in Vienna, Austria.
The Late Zaven Qukasyan had a venerable experience in compiling books
on the Iranian cinema dating back to 1971 with a book on ‘The
Fountain’ by Arbi Avanesian.
His name will, therefore, be immortalized in the history of Iranian
cinema. Following is a short report on his life and work presented
here. Late Qukasyan died yesterday before noon, February 20, 2015, in
Isfahan. Iran Book News Agency says condolences on the loss of this
scholar and film critic to his family and the family of the Iranian
cinema.
Zaven Qukasyan was born in 1950 in Isfahan. He pursued his academic
studies in the field of chemistry in the University of Isfahan. He
then started his artistic career by making 8 mm. films in Azad
(independent) cinema (which later changed name to Young Cinema
Society). He also worked as the Director of the Azad (independent)
Cinema of Isfahan.

Qukasyan served as a jury member in several Film Festivals both in
Iran and abroad. He also taught Cinema at Sepehr University in Isfahan
and Soureh University in Tehran during the past ten years.

http://www.ibna.ir/en/doc/naghli/218624/zaven-qukasyan-writer-and-historian-of-iranian-cinema-dies

Ter-Petrosyan not to meet with Sargsyan

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 21 2015

Ter-Petrosyan not to meet with Sargsyan

21 February 2015 – 5:43pm

The leader of the Armenian National Congress, Armenia’s first
president Levon Ter-Petrosyan said that today he will not meet with
the president of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan. He said his response to the
“Open letter to Serzh Sargsyan” was satisfactory and he doesn’t feel
the need have a meeting with him. The Open letter was an answer to the
Pan-Armenian declaration dedicate to the 100th anniversary of tragic
events in Turkey which occurred in 1915.

Levon Ter-Petrosyan criticized the declaration in his open letter
urging the Armenian authorities to put it in line with international
law.

Khalaf Khalafov: EU should adopt sanctions against Armenia

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 21 2015

Khalaf Khalafov: EU should adopt sanctions against Armenia

21 February 2015 – 7:24pm

The deputy foreign minister of Azerbaijan, Khalaf Khalafov, said today
during his meeting with the Secretary of State of Germany, Markus
Ederer, that the EU should impose sanctions against Armenia, which is
occupying Azerbaijani territories.

Markus Ederer said that Germany considers Azerbaijan to be an
important partner in the South Caucasus in the political, economic and
cultural spheres.

Khalafov also met with a number of other important politicians in the U.S.

No straight talk from Netanyahu

MetroWest Daily News
Feb 21 2015

No straight talk from Netanyahu

by MARTIN DEMOORJIAN
Posted Feb. 20, 2015 at 11:06 PM

I write in response to a column, “Let Netanyahu speak,” by Frank
Mazzaglia (Jan. 31) and wonder if sometimes columnists aren’t paid to
write the things they do that can come across as marketing. Mr.
Mazzaglia writes, “The American people have a right to hear what the
straight-talking Benjamin Netanyahu has to say…” Straight-talking!
Benjamin Netanyahu is no more straight-talking than Mahmoud Abbas and
his upcoming address to Congress can be tantamount to lobbying.

TIME Magazine (March 18, 2012 ) wrote, “Netanyahu’s basic principle is
to trust no one to speak truthfully.” One can only wonder if this
includes him and can easily raise the question of trusting him. Mr.
Netanyahu is smart and strong but the most he gets done is building
provocative settlements and deploying the Israeli military. Mr.
Netanyahu, no more than Mr. Abbas, has done nothing to promote peace.
Without being disrespectful, they each talk out of both sides of the
mouth typical of so many politicians.

Respecting the many ramifications, this so-called peace process is
wearing thin. Perhaps peace has its own definition to the different
participants. If the Irish can come to terms with their troubles it is
curious if they are smarter than those in the Mideast in dealing with
their problems. If so, perhaps the Irish should be included in the
Mideast peace process for the greater good.

I strongly believe all in the Mideast are smart enough to achieve
peace if they really want it. I have a cousin who comes from the early
days of Israel. One holiday gathering she was asked, “When will they
have peace over there?” She gave an immediate answer, “When they elect
a woman president because they’re tired of losing their sons.” There
was such an opportunity in Israel two elections ago that put Mr.
Netanyahu to lead the county and paints a very clear picture that can
relate to the assassination of PM Yitzhak Rabin. I still see the news
report’s grinning police guard giving a tender slap to the assassin’s
face as if giving approval.

I believe in Israel’s future but doubt they would tolerate living
under the yoke of another such as the Palestinians do. While some
Palestinians are no saints the same can be said for some Israelis
along with everyone else.

Israel is threatened by Iran and the Armenians are threatened by
Azerbaijan. Israel trades arms for oil with Azerbaijan that help
contribute to the instability of that region. Israel is duly
threatened by anyone supplying weaponry to any country endangering it
no differently than that which exists between Armenia and Azerbaijan.
With such arms sales it appears Israel is willing to sacrifice others,
which raise questions about the moral character of its leadership.

Obama snubs Mr. Netanyahu yet overlook that Israel’s leadership
snubbed President Jimmy Carter when he visited Israel, regardless that
he brokered its first peace treaty.The United States Ambassador to
Armenia, John Evans, was discharged when he challenged protocols using
the genocide word when referencing the 1915 Armenian Massacres, going
beyond his scope of duties. Perhaps John Boehner should be discharged
for the same reason when inviting a foreign leader and exceeding his
duties; imagine had he invited Mr. Abbas!

http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/article/20150220/OPINION/150229237/2011/OPINION

ISTANBUL: Ankara delays final decision on missile defense system unt

Today’s Zaman, Turkey
Feb 21 2015

Ankara delays final decision on missile defense system until April 24

SERVET YANATMA- ANKARA

Turkish decision-makers have agreed to postpone a final decision in a
missile defense »»

Turkish decision-makers have agreed to postpone a final decision in a
missile defense system acquisition tender until after April 24, the
centennial of what Armenians call a genocide of their people,
apparently linking the awarding of the contract to the French and US
governments’ stances on the events.

NATO member Turkey chose the China Precision Machinery Import and
Export Corp (CPMIEC) as its preferred bidder in 2013, and Defense
Minister İsmet Yılmaz indicated on Thursday that Ankara was planning
to continue with the Chinese system, saying the assessment of bids was
completed.

The Undersecretariat for Defense Industries (SSM), however, clarified
in a subsequent statement that a final decision had not been made yet,
saying Turkey was still in discussion with other bidders.

Eurosam, which is owned by Franco-Italian missile maker MBDA and
France’s Thales, is the second-best bidder in the tender. US-listed
Raytheon Co. is also competing in the tender, with its Patriot missile
defense system.

The Armenian genocide claims have long been a thorn in Turkey’s
relations with Western countries. Ankara categorically denies claims
that 1.5 million Armenians were massacred in eastern Anatolia as part
of a systematic genocide campaign during World War I, and says there
were deaths on both sides when Armenians revolted against the Ottoman
Empire for independence.

France recognizes the genocide allegations and an effort to
criminalize its denial failed only because it was revoked by the
country’s Constitutional Council.

US presidents traditionally release a statement on April 24 every year
to commemorate the deaths of Armenians. No US president has so far
referred to the deaths as `genocide,’ to the disappointment of the
Armenian diaspora.

Officials attending an SSM meeting in January on the missile defense
tender agreed to wait a little longer before reaching a final
decision, Today’s Zaman has learned.

The delay in announcing a final decision on the missile defense tender
is seen as an effort to use it as leverage against any undesired steps
from the US or France regarding the Armenian genocide claims, given
the Armenians’ stepped-up efforts for wider recognition in the run-up
the 100th anniversary of the tragedy.

A Turkish Foreign Ministry official said that the final decision on
the missile defense system is `not being rushed,’ saying the Turkish
authorities are conducting a thorough assessment in line with national
interests. Speaking to Today’s Zaman, the official declined to comment
on the suggestion that the decision is used as leverage in efforts to
counter Armenian lobbying ahead of April 24.

http://www.todayszaman.com/mobile_detailHeadline.action?newsId=373183

Massacri, stupri e odio Il genocidio degli armeni così feroce e così

il Giornale- Italia
08 feb 2015

Massacri, stupri e odio Il genocidio degli armeni così feroce e così attuale

Nel 1915 iniziò in Turchia una pulizia etnica che anticipò la Shoah In
nome della Guerra santa un intero popolo venne costretto all’esodo

Quando nonno Yerwant raccontava della sua lontana infanzia
nell’Armenia anatolica, ogni cosa acquistava il colore di un quieto
idillio pastorale. C’erano valli ubertose e ruscelli mormoranti,
pianure e villaggi montani, e c’era la Masseria delle Allodole, dove
lui, il figlio maggiore, correva libero per campi e frutteti, e rubava
con l’amico Ovhannes i giganteschi meloni con una carriola.

C’era la sua mamma Iskuhì dalle gote di pesca, così giovane, quasi
bambina, che lo abbracciava stretto e poi giocava con lui. Le storie
del Paese Perduto. Quante volte le ripetevano gli armeni sopravvissuti
al Metz Yeghérn (Il Grande Male), il genocidio del 1915, sparsi
dappertutto per il vasto mondo, quanti particolari raccontavano sui
parenti scomparsi nel ferro e nel fuoco, sulle piccole memorie di
piccoli eventi vicini al loro cuore di bambini strappati al nido e a
ogni caldo conforto! E come era irrimediabile la loro profonda
malinconia: sapevano che non c’era rimedio possibile, che per loro non
si sarebbe mai potuto parlare di ritorno, e che lo shock
dell’abbandono e della solitudine non si sarebbe mai cancellato. E
sapevano che, se parlavano, non li ascoltava nessuno…

Un popolo in diaspora, che in quella terribile estate del 1915 venne
scacciato per sempre – attraverso la morte o l’esilio – dalle sue
terre ancestrali: e non a causa di terribili eventi naturali, ma per
la funesta volontà politica del triumvirato che controllava l’impero
Ottomano, e che aveva deciso di farla finita con le minoranze. Una
storia ben nota all’epoca, di cui tutta la stampa (anche quella
italiana!) parlò abbondantemente. Sui giornali del 1915-16 si trovano
infatti moltissime notizie sui massacri armeni: si pubblicavano
corrispondenze e rapporti di consoli, mercanti, viaggiatori che in
quel momento si trovavano all’interno dell’impero e che avevano
assistito impotenti agli orrori e potuto misurare di persona
l’estensione e la violenza degli avvenimenti. Giacomo Gorrini, console
italiano a Trebisonda, concesse al Messaggero di Roma un’intervista
lucida e appassionata che resta ancor oggi come uno dei più
documentati rapporti sull’eliminazione degli armeni dal grande porto
sul Mar Nero: le barche cariche di gente fatte colare a picco, gli
uomini e i ragazzi finiti a colpi di accetta; e poi stupri, rapimenti
delle giovani donne, schiavitù dei bambini.

Ma perché la strage degli armeni è considerata il primo genocidio del
Ventesimo secolo? Che cosa lega questa tragedia, avvenuta durante la
Prima guerra mondiale, alla Shoah ebraica durante la Seconda? Quali
sono le somiglianze fra Hitler e i tre massacratori degli armeni, i
ministri Talaat, Enver, Djemal? Il genocidio degli armeni fu uno dei
frutti avvelenati del nazionalismo ottocentesco, attecchito
nell’impero Ottomano (sotto le mentite spoglie di una lotta ai vecchi
costumi e alla corruzione del governo dei Sultani) col colpo di Stato
del 1908, che portò al governo il partito dei Giovani turchi. Una
specie di «primavera ottomana» riscaldò in quel periodo i cuori dei
giovani delle minoranze, ma la ventata democratica durò assai poco, e
gli armeni e i greci che – illusi – avevano marciato insieme ai
Giovani turchi dovettero ben presto riconoscere che il sogno di una
nuova nazione escludeva proprio loro, classificandoli come minoranze
riottose di cui diffidare.

Una teoria ideologica a sostegno della preminenza dei «turchi di
sangue» fu elaborata (come ha riportato alla luce lo storico turco
Taner Akcam); una sistematica opera di de-umanizzazione e di pulizia
etnica fu lanciata, ma per poter operare fino in fondo con successo (e
per coinvolgere la popolazione turca, chiamandola anche alla guerra di
religione contro gli armeni cristiani) ci voleva l’occasione adatta:
fu il conflitto mondiale.

Agosto 1914: tuonano i cannoni d’agosto, come si disse allora.
L’intera Europa si precipita a cuor leggero nell’immensa strage della
Grande guerra. Novembre 1914: l’impero Ottomano entra in guerra a
fianco degli imperi Centrali, Germania e Austria-Ungheria. Il
principale artefice di questa scelta turca fu proprio Enver, modesto
stratega dall’io fuori misura; ma oltre a tentare un’offensiva sul
fronte russo, dove venne ingloriosamente sconfitto, si sentì le mani
libere per affrontare la cosiddetta «questione armena». Gli armeni
divennero il capro espiatorio ideale, una personale ossessione. E qui
si vedono i motivi per chiamare questa tragedia genocidio. Fu uno
sterminio preparato a freddo, organizzato, totale, che aveva come
bersaglio un popolo intero, senza fare differenze fra uomini, donne,
vecchi, bambini: lo scopo era l’eliminazione di un gruppo etnico dalla
sua patria ancestrale, e fu raggiunto. Circa i tre quarti del popolo
armeno in Turchia scomparve, nei mille modi dell’orrore: gli uomini
subito uccisi, le donne avviate alla morte lenta della deportazione
nel deserto. Furono usati vagoni piombati, primitive camere a gas,
eliminazioni collettive: le tecniche usate per l’annientamento degli
armeni divennero un modello che sarà ripetuto nel corso del Novecento,
prima di tutto contro gli ebrei.

L’affinità fra armeni ed ebrei è apparsa sempre più evidente negli
ultimi anni, in documenti e testimonianze uscite da archivi,
biblioteche, corrispondenze private, da cui emergono agghiaccianti
parallelismi nella sistematicità e nella ritualità delle esecuzioni, e
anche nella spietata efficienza dei carnefici. Non c’è davvero nulla
di nuovo sotto il sole. Provocando brividi di orrore, oggi la
televisione esibisce immagini di decapitazioni di ostaggi, che seguono
un preciso percorso rituale. Ma nel Dna degli armeni sono incise
analoghe, terribili foto risalenti a cent’anni fa, e anche di più:
teste tagliate di intellettuali, sgocciolate dal sangue, venivano
esposte davanti al fotografo con garbo e un pizzico di soddisfatto
orgoglio, come monito e segno di disprezzo verso i deboli appartenenti
a un volgo sconfitto. Questa è l’ombra lunga del 1915, la profondità
dell’abisso del male da cui ogni tanto ci illudiamo ingenuamente di
essere usciti: eppure la scelta umile e coraggiosa della vita è sempre
possibile, come la tenace diaspora armena ha dimostrato.

http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/massacri-stupri-e-odio-genocidio-degli-armeni-cos-feroce-e-1090972.html