Amal Clooney Shows Off Her ‘Ede & Ravenscroft’ In Court

AMAL CLOONEY SHOWS OFF HER ‘EDE & RAVENSCROFT’ IN COURT

International Business Times AU, Australia
Feb 4 2015

By Barnali on February 04 2015 5:22 AM

The high profile human rights lawyer and Ms George Clooney with her
impeccable fashion sense had already made a name for herself in her
profession. Now, she is making waves as a fashionista on the red
carpet as well as in the courtroom, according to E Online.

At the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, a correspondent
made a joke at her expense, saying that she was “expected to turn up
in a Versace.” Pointing at her gown or robe and collar bands, Amal
Clooney said she was wearing Ede & Ravenscroft. “I’m wearing Ede &
Ravenscroft,” she said to the reporter, taking the joke very well
in her stride and laughing it off. For those who are not familiar
with the name, the London firm of tailors has been in the business
of making gowns for lawyers and other legal stuff since 1689.

Amal words went down very well on Twitter, where fans praised her for
the way she was able to handle her celebrity status, after getting
married to George Clooney. Later the journalist, who posed the
question, was forced to respond to the hype by writing an article
on it. Meanwhile, Geoffery Robertson, Amal’s senior, was visibly
pleased that the case would now shift focus from her private life to
her professional life as an attorney.

Amal is fighting a genocide denial case against a Turkish politician.

He was convicted for denying the massacre of 1915 that according
to estimates killed 1.5 million Armenians. The politician was found
guilty by a Swiss court in 2008 after he said that the killings were
an “international lie.” European Court of Human Rights, however,
gave a verdict in his favour.

Meanwhile, Clooney was recently spotted at the airport, donning a
red leather coat, on her way to the court. She is a barrister with
the London chamber, specialising in human rights, international law
and extradition. She is fluent in three languages English, French and
Arabic. Clooney is famous for representing Wikileaks founder Juilian
Assnge and former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko.

Apart from being a well-known lawyer, she is now in the public eye
for marrying actor, director, George Clooney in 2014. She had advised
Greece last year on how to get back the disputed statues named ‘Elgin
Marbles’ from Britain.

http://au.ibtimes.com/amal-clooney-shows-her-ede-ravenscroft-court-1416535

Guest Pianist Joins Symphony For Evening Of Romance

GUEST PIANIST JOINS SYMPHONY FOR EVENING OF ROMANCE

The Roanoke Star, VA
Feb 3 2015

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra’s upcoming masterworks concert
features Armenian-American pianist Tanya Gabrielian, who will perform
Tchaikovsky’s romantic and inspiring first piano concerto, along with
pieces from Mozart and Ralph Vaughn Williams.

The program is set for 7:30 p.m. on Feb. 17 and is presented by the
Center for the Arts at Virginia Tech. It will be held in the Anne and
Ellen Fife Theatre, located within the Moss Arts Center’s Street and
Davis Performance Hall at 190 Alumni Mall.

Guest soloist Gabrielian has performed around the world and rose to
international acclaim after receiving first prizes in the Scottish
International Piano Competition and the Aram Khachaturyan International
Piano Competition, as well as the Pro Musicis International Award.

Gabrielian will join the orchestra, which is led by music director and
conductor David Stewart Wiley, for an evening of music that includes
Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto no. 1, in B-flat Minor, op. 23; Mozart’s
Symphony No. 36 in C, “Linz;” and Vaughn Williams’ “Fantasia on a
Theme by Thomas Tallis.”

Tchaikovsky’s work epitomizes the romantic piano concerto. It was the
first Russian piano concerto to enter the standard concert repertoire,
and it has remained one of the most popular concertos ever written.

The program is supported in part by a touring grant from the Virginia
Commission for the Arts.

Tickets can be purchased online; at the Moss Arts Center’s box office,
10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Monday through Friday and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on
Saturday; or by calling 540-231-5300.

http://theroanokestar.com/2015/02/03/guest-pianist-joins-symphony-for-evening-of-romance/

Details Unveiled For Armenian Pavilion At The 2015 Venice Biennale

DETAILS UNVEILED FOR ARMENIAN PAVILION AT THE 2015 VENICE BIENNALE

Art Forum
Feb 2 2015

On the occasion of the hundredth year following the Armenian Genocide,
the country’s ministry of culture will be devoting its pavilion to
the artists of the Armenian diaspora.

Eighteen artists in total will be featured: Haig Aivazian (Lebanon),
Nigol Bezjian (Syria/USA), Anna Boghiguian (Egypt/Canada),
Hera BuyuktaÅ~_cıyan (Turkey), Silvina Der-Meguerditchian
(Argentina/Germany), Rene Gabri & Ayreen Anastas (Iran/Palestine/USA),
Mekhitar Garabedian (Belgium), Aikaterini Gegisian (Greece), Yervant
Gianikian & Angela Ricci Lucchi (Italy), Aram Jibilian (USA), Nina
Katchadourian (USA/Finland), Melik Ohanian (France), Mikayel Ohanjanyan
(Armenia/Italy), Rosana Palazyan (Brasil), Sarkis (Turkey/France),
and Hrair Sarkissian (Syria/UK).

Curated by Adelina Cuberyan von Furstenberg, the pavilion will explore
what she’s calling the notion of “armenity,” which in her words
encapsulates concepts of “displacement and territory, justice and
reconciliation, ethos and resilience.” The pavilion will be situated
on the Island of San Lazzaro.

http://artforum.com/news/id=50037

Armenia: Problem Child Of South Caucasus – OpEd

ARMENIA: PROBLEM CHILD OF SOUTH CAUCASUS – OPED

Eurasia Review
Feb 3 2015

By Eurasia Review

By Mushvig Mehdiyev*

While many of the countries that formed the Soviet Union have found
peace and stability, this has not been the case in the south Caucasus
where Armenia and Azerbaijan have been fighting over Nagorno-Karabakh.

What is it that has prevented the two countries from resolving their
differences and find a solution to the 25-year old conflict? Why is it
that the Minsk Group, established by the Organization for Security and
Co-operation in Europe, and that comprises mediators from the U.S.,
France and Russia, have failed to achieve any breakthrough in more
than two decades?

Location and extent of the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast
(lighter color)

Armenia is the problem child of the South Caucasus. They have
repeatedly blocked the way to a peaceful settlement of the conflict.

Close to the collapse of the Soviet empire in 1988, Azerbaijani troops
and Armenian separatists began a bloody war over the Nagorno-Karabakh
region, which is the part of Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized
territory. Although the war ended in a truce in 1994, it fueled the
forcible occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh alongside seven other adjacent
Azerbaijani districts, killing dozens and displacing tens of thousands
of ethnic Azerbaijanis.

One reason why solving this dispute is important is because it provides
fuel to keep the fires of discord burning, a situation that may erupt
in open warfare at any moment pulling the rest of the region in a
deadly and disastrous chain of events.

“No one can ignore the simple fact that Armenia is an aggressor nation
that continues to occupy Azerbaijan’s territory, and constitutes a
belligerent threat to peace and security in the entire post-Soviet
region,” said the Hill, a Washington, DC-based newspaper.

Adding to the tension, Armenia’s rulers, its president and military
brass have periodically delivered threats against Azerbaijan.

For instance, on November 8, 2012, in an interview with The Wall
Street Journal, President Serzh Sargsyan said Armenia would strike
Azerbaijan in a disproportionately hard way.

Sargsyan’s regular speeches of intimidating Azerbaijan has become a
tradition, as on November 14, 2010, he threatened a devastating and
decisive air strike on the rival country, evoking not too-distant
memories of the Great Patriotic War (WWII), when Nazi war planes
bombarded parts of Azerbaijan.

Artak Davtyan, a high-ranking Armenian official added: “Armenian
forces can attack military units of the supposed rival with missiles,
as well as its strategic and economic objects at a distance of 300
kilometers and more.”

These words prove Armenia’s clear stance on the Nagorno-Karabakh
dispute – the post-Soviet country opts for constructive attempts
rather than coming with peace-building actions.

Georgia, another country in the South Caucasus region, faces severe
problems caused by Armenia. In the historical Georgian province
of Samtskhe-Javakheti Armenians triggered ethnic tension when they
claimed the regions and provinces belonged to Armenia.

The history of the compact Armenian population in Samtskhe-Javakheti
started 170 years ago, according to the Institute for Central Asian
and Caucasian Studies in Sweden and the Institute of Strategic Studies
of the South Caucasus in Azerbaijan. After winning the 1828-1829 war
against the Ottoman Empire and seizing the Black Sea coast between
the Kuban River and the port of Poti, as well as a large chunk of
Meskheti and Javakheti, Russia started to move Armenians from Turkey
to the Central Caucasus and Georgia in great numbers. The newcomers
who settled in the Akhalkalaki (Javakheti) soon outnumbered all the
local Georgians, says the source.

Since Samtskhe-Javakheti is a transit territory for the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, which is called an “official enemy”
by all Armenians, the local Armenians present a potential threat to
the pipeline. Therefore, terrorism and subversion attempts cannot
be completely excluded. The Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipeline, which
ends in Turkey, as well as the Baku-Supsa oil pipeline may also face
the same threats from Armenians.

The investigative institutes claim that today Javakheti is another
delayed action bomb in the South Caucasus region, as the insistent
demands from Armenians for autonomy fuels the region’s instability.

Moreover Yerevan is also very active behind the scenes, even resorting
to issuing threats and warning Georgia if it engages in acts of
violence against the Armenian political movements in Javakheti,
it will not remain impartial to the fate of its fellow countrymen
living in the region.

Meanwhile, the religious elite of Armenia have very recently urged
Georgia to return hundreds of Georgian Orthodox churches to Armenian
control. The Armenian side filed a claim against its neighbor demanding
for restoration of its ownership over 442 churches in the territory
of Georgia.

One of the churches, Zugdidi, has supposedly been built in in 70-80s
of the XVIII century, according to the Armenian historians and
scholars. But the scholars in Georgia claim that a documentary fact
proves that until the abolition of the Georgian statehood in 1801,
it has been strictly forbidden for the Armenians to build their
churches in the country’s territory.

* Mushvig Mehdiyev is a journalist at the Baku-based AzerNews
newspaper, and is engaged in developing regular analytical articles
about the South Caucasus region.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/03022015-armenia-problem-child-south-caucasus-oped/

Mustafa Barzani: The Father Of Modern Kurdistan Partriotism

MUSTAFA BARZANI: THE FATHER OF MODERN KURDISTAN PARTRIOTISM

Communities Digital News
Feb 3 2015

by Kevin Fobbs – Feb 2, 2015

WASHINGTON, February 2, 2015 – Americans have a fondness and a sense
of patriotism when thinking of the nation’s first president and how
he led the Revolutionary War’s forces of freedom. Well here is a
question for you to ponder.

When you cross Oskar Schindler, Lawrence of Arabia and George
Washington, what do you get?

Mustafa Barzani (March 14, 1903 – March 1, 1979) of Kurdistan is
the legendary father of the modern Kurdish people, according to
Hallie Neill, an international opera star and spokesperson for the
humanitarian charity Coats 4 Kurdistan.

Neill, a recent guest on Community Digital News Hour’s “Standing
at Freedom’s Gate”, was joined over the past week in America by
officials from Barzani Charity Foundation to emphasis why Mustafa
Barzani’s historic patriotism is similar to America’s battlefield
and presidential leader.

Freedom for the five million who occupy Kurdistan as well as the over
two million refugees is in serious peril from ISIS forces. This winter
has had a withering impact on the children, babies and families as
well as mothers who according to Neill, “wail every night over their
daily and collected tragedies and suffering.”

On Saturday, Fox News anchor Kelly Wright spoke with Neill and Awat
Mustafa, Director of Projects and Operations for the Kurdish Barzani
Charity Foundation about why Americans should be involved in the fight
to help support them. It is quite simple, Americans love patriots and
supports the underdog, and these Kurdish people and their “Peshmerga”
fighters are freedom fighters who are underdogs with the hearts
of lions.

If one were to understand the meaning of Peshmerga, then you would
easily understand the historic tie-ins to George Washington’s
leadership legacy. The word Peshmerga, according to the statement
released by Coats 4 Kurdistan means “One who faces death.”

Kurdistan’s modern day founder Mustafa Barzani faced that heroically
even while in his youth, according to the statement, “He personally
rescued hundreds of persecuted, about-to-be-massacred Armenian
Christians during one of the greatest genocides of the last century.”

Being a freedom fighter is not easy regardless of the war or the
century you are fighting in. For Americans who would easily dismiss
the Kurdish fight as something as simple as a “freedom fight between
Muslims,” seriously need to be educated as well as compassionate.

Barzani was a tribal leader who unlike his contemporaries was a
man ahead of his time because of his tolerance and his progressive,
non-discriminatory treatment of people of other beliefs.

Just as America came together and joined the colonies into one
United States in their fight against British tyranny of the time,
the Kurdish are fighting for their freedom and for their lives against
a far worse brutal tyranny and evil that ISIS embodies.

Through the continuing effort and support from Americans in nearly
all 50 states Coats 4Kurdistan a difference is being made.

Hallie Neill stressed, “We are pleased to be partnering with the
Barzani Charity Foundation to create awareness among Americans and
to encourage people with a heart to donate funds that will provide
for life critical humanitarian help — food, warm clothing, medicine
and other life critical supplies to be delivered to the refugees.”

This effort is crucial to not only benefit the Kurdish who are facing
temperatures in mountainous Kurdistan dropping to historic levels,
but over the last few weeks alone, authorities have reported nearly
a dozen children have died from the cold.

February may be the shortest month of the year, but Hallie Neill
and the officials from the Barzani Charity Foundation are hoping and
praying that Americans will open their hearts and donate to make this
month have the largest impact for the Kurdish people.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.commdiginews.com/featured/mustafa-barzan-the-father-of-modern-kurdistan-partriotism-34334/

After Eurasian Deal, Free Expression Fears In Armenia

AFTER EURASIAN DEAL, FREE EXPRESSION FEARS IN ARMENIA

Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
IWPR CRs #766
Feb 3 2015

Membership of Russian-led bloc could mean restrictions on free speech.

By Arpi Harutyunyan

Supporters of free speech in Armenia fear that the country’s accession
to the new Eurasian Economic Union could restrict the free flow
of information.

Armenia joined the union when it came into being at the beginning
of January. The other members are Russia, Belarus and Kazakstan,
with Kyrgyzstan expected to join shortly.

According to a copy of Armenia’s accession agreement posted on the
economy ministry’s website, member states cannot import, export or
distribute material prohibited in other bloc states. Furthermore, the
agreement bans the “distribution of printed, audio and visual materials
liable to harm the political and economic interests of member states,
their national security, or the health and morals of their citizens.”

This wording is part of the terms of trade and customs regulations
that bind the new economic grouping.

Before Armenia joined, its own customs rules determined what could
or could not be brought into the country.

Under the Eurasian Economic Union agreement, restrictions include
the loose concept of member states’ “political interests”.

Suren Deheryan, head of Journalists for the Future, an Armenian press
freedom organisation, is concerned that the restriction will be used
to silence critics.

“This implies that imports of Western press and literature to the
Eurasian Economic Union should be prohibited, since such material
often contains criticism of the [bloc states’] political elite,”
Deheryan said.

Even before Armenia joined the union, critics said accession could
undermine the country’s sovereignty. President Serzh Sargsyan insisted
there was “no danger” to Armenia’s independent status. (See Armenia’s
Eurasian Deal: Sell-Out or Fair Trade? )

For some, those fears have now been realised.

In December, Armen Martirosyan, head of the Antares printing company,
attended a conference on the Eurasian Economic Union in St Petersburg,
where he raised questions about what membership would mean for the
publishing industry.

“I was told that the Eurasian Economic Union was a purely economic
union and that cultural matters were unrelated,” Martirosyan said.

“But in reality they are connected. It turns out that the Eurasian
Economic Union is not purely an economic union; it is gradually
expanding into other areas.”

The editor of the Yerevan Press Club, Heriknaz Harutyunyan, believes
that the Eurasian treaty violates basic human rights and may have
significant consequences not only for dissemination of information
but also on the freedom of movement across borders.

“The ban on the distribution of such prohibited information may
prevent any one of us from leaving the country, for example to travel
Yerevan-Moscow-London,” Harutyunyan told IWPR. “Any absurd pretext
may be cited as a breach of the ban, for example, carrying an ordinary
music CD.”

Not everyone thinks the restrictions will go that far. Deheryan
believes it unlikely that things will reach a point where people
travelling in and out of Armenia need authorisation to carry a book
or a magazine in a suitcase. But he thinks the agreement could still
have far-reaching consequences, particularly as it might pave the
way for moves to muzzle voices critical of the government.

“If we talk about dissent, Russia has already started blocking
websites and blogs that offer alternative opinions, and it has done so
unashamedly, using dozens of amendments to existing legislation as well
as new laws adopted in 2014,” Deheryan said. “Since Russia has taken
control of the content of Runet [Russian domain names] and feels at
liberty to shut down any content that for some reason is inconsistent
with or contrary to law, then why not do the same at customs controls?”

An annex to the Eurasian agreement also bans other kinds of content,
including Nazi propaganda and symbols, justifications of terrorism,
pornography and even election campaign materials deemed illegal in
any of the four states.

Martirosyan said the ban was unconstitutional and would have major
ramifications for his company and the material it publishes. He gave
the example of a book about the 2008 Russian-Georgian war by former
US State Department staffer Ronald Asmus, called A Little War that
Shook the World.

“We have published Asmus’s book and it is now on sale, but according to
the new restrictions we cannot export it to another country because
this runs contrary to the interests of Russia,” he said. “That’s
absurd.”

Martirosyan also questioned the ban on Nazi symbols, particularly
as the ancient swastika remains a common symbol of eternity or God
in Armenia, and appears in several churches such as the 13th-century
Noravank Monastery.

“If someone in Italy publishes a book about Noravank, will it be
impossible to import it to Armenia?” Martirosyan asked.

Ara Shirinyan, director of the Yerevan-based television company
Shoghakat, said the restrictions were comparable to those of the
Soviet era, although in the modern internet age they were by and large
meaningless and could not be enforced. However, he is concerned that
the new law has implications for wider political freedoms in Armenia.

“It may give the authorities an additional lever to persecute political
opponents and individuals,” Shirinyan said.

Arpi Harutyunyan is a freelance journalist in Armenia.

3 Feb 15

https://iwpr.net/global-voices/after-eurasian-deal-free-expression-fears-armenia

Murphy’s Law: A Cossack Too Far

MURPHY’S LAW: A COSSACK TOO FAR

Strategy Page
Feb 3 2015

February 3, 2015: In eastern Ukraine (Donbas) most of the Russian
backed rebels are actually disorganized, discouraged and not all that
effective. Interrogations of captured rebels indicate that there are
many different factions, some of them not even from Ukraine. The most
colorful of these foreigners are the “Cossack” units from southern
Russia. The Cossacks are very nationalist, aggressive, persistent,
independent minded and really keen on rebuilding the Russian empire
(which is what Cossacks were invented for centuries ago). Actually
the Cossacks attract a wide array or rebellious Russians and many
of those in the Donbas are not keen on taking orders from anyone. So
one reason for sending more Russian troops in is to try and get the
Cossacks to do what Russia, not Cossack leaders, want. That’s not
the only problems the Russians are having with these guys. Cossacks
are a number of things, including righteous. Although poorly treated
by the communists, the Cossacks are believers in collectivism and
tend to be very hostile to corrupt leaders they come across. This
has caused problems in Russia and again in Donbas because some of
the local separatist rebel leaders are, for want of a better term,
quite corrupt. Cossacks accuse these leaders of stealing Russian
aid and taking care of themselves and their armed followers rather
that sticking with the goal of an independent Donbas or incorporation
into Russia. What is feared is the troublesome and righteous Cossacks
triggering a civil war among the rebels.

The Cossacks were welcome arrivals when they showed up in 2014, because
the original local Donbas rebels quickly lost their enthusiasm when
their uprising triggered a nationalistic fervor throughout Ukraine and
inspired Ukrainian troops and armed volunteers to fight a lot harder
than the rebels expected. Russia, which sponsored and encouraged the
rebels from the start soon found that the only way they could take
territory was to send in Russian troops and heavy weapons (tanks,
artillery, rocket launchers, missiles). The special operations units
(Spetsnaz) were the best for this because these guys knew how to
pretend (that they were Ukrainian rebels) and were very effective
fighters. But there not enough of them available and regular Russian
troops (which are mainly conscripts) had to be sent in as well,
especially for support (transport and supply) functions. Soon it was
Russian troops leading in any offensives with the local rebels and
other volunteers (like the Cossacks and such from Russia) handling
occupation of newly conquered territory. These imported rebels and
conscript troops did not do much to hide who they were and where they
were from.

Elsewhere in Russia the Cossacks have been less trouble and more
useful. The Cossacks are also being used to try and replace all
the Russian inhabitants of the Caucasus who have been driven out by
nationalist rebels and Islamic terrorists. Russia had, over the last
two centuries, encouraged ethnic Russians to settle in the Caucasus
in order to help maintain Russian control of an often-hostile native
population. With the collapse of the empire (the Soviet Union) in
1991 there was no money left to subsidize the ethnic Russians in the
Caucasus. That, as much as the anti-Russian attitudes of the natives,
prompted most Russians to leave. Now the Russian government is using
an old solution to get more ethnic Russians back into the Caucasus;
it’s sending in the Cossacks.

The Cossack people are ethnic Russians with a distinct language and
culture (not quite Russian) and strong ties to the Russian Orthodox
Church. There are about seven million Cossacks in Russia, Ukraine,
and other portions of the former Soviet Union. Their involvement
in Russian wars goes back centuries. During Tsarist times, Cossacks
formed special cavalry units in the Imperial Russian Army, as well
serving as instruments of state repression. The Russian Empire had a
special arrangement with the Cossacks whereby, in exchange for frontier
land, greater political autonomy, and special social status, Cossacks
contributed military forces, providing their own horses, weapons,
and equipment. Unique, exclusively Cossack military formations have
been a staple of Russian history in one way or another for many,
many centuries. Cossacks were also notorious for their willingness
to do the czar’s dirty work, especially in the Caucasus.

Opinions on the actual military value of Cossack units is widely
divided, as are opinions of the Cossacks themselves. At many points
in Russian military history the Cossacks proved themselves to be
determined and fierce, sometimes to the point of recklessness,
warriors, and there are examples of entire Cossack units fighting
to the death against impossible odds. During the Napoleonic Wars
and the French invasion of Russia in 1812 Cossack units, mostly as
light cavalry, operated extremely effectively as scouts and raiders,
harassing the retreating French army mercilessly. Their performance
against regular troops in open battle was less than great, but then
that wasn’t their role anyway.

On the other hand Cossack units, from the days of Peter the Great
until modern time, have a well-deserved reputation for brutality,
anti-Semitism, and looting. They have always been notoriously difficult
to control, with Russian officers in past wars becoming frustrated
and enraged with drunken, mutinous Cossack soldiers. During the
Russian Civil War, Cossacks fought for both sides, especially for the
anti-Communist White forces, but they were often divisive, unreliable,
and preoccupied with looting and general destruction.

Also, many Russians regarded them as potential rebels, given their
unruly history, large numbers, and independent-minded spirit, and
those familiar with history know that for a two century period, every
major rebellion against the Russian Empire was led by Cossack troops.

During the Soviet period, Cossacks were among the many ill-treated
minorities, having their distinct culture and language suppressed by
the Communist authorities.

Since the 1990s Cossacks are once again involved in Russian conflicts.

In an effort to bolster national pride and recover some of the distinct
Russian heritage that was suppressed during 70 years of Soviet rule
Russia has officially brought back the formation of exclusively
Cossack military units, and in a big way. This has accompanied a
general explosion of Cossack culture in recent years.

Cossack military schools have been established, where student ages
10 to 17 attend classes in army fatigues and learn military tactics
alongside regular academic subjects. An entire Kuban Cossack Army,
headquartered in Krasnodar, has been established and is incorporated
as a unique, but fully integrated, part of the Russian Army. The
Russian Minister for Cossack Affairs, general Gennady Troshev (until
his death in 2009) was a Cossack himself and had been instrumental
in the remilitarization of the Cossack society.

Irregular Cossack paramilitary units fought on the Russian/separatist
side in the 2008 Russo-Georgian War, which saw South Ossetia taken
from Georgia and made a de facto part of Russia. Cossack volunteers
by the hundreds mobilized during the Georgian attack of South Ossetia
and crossed the border to engage Georgian forces. Cossacks in nearby
North Ossetia apparently organized a relatively efficient and rapid
system for clothing, equipping and transporting their paramilitaries
into the breakaway province to feed them into combat. Cossack fighters
entered South Ossetia by bus, having been issued combat uniforms and
gear on the way to the border, and were issued small arms and light
weapons once they arrived at the border. Cossack volunteers formed
the second major paramilitary force in the war, the first being the
South Ossetian militias. According to reports, the Cossack forces
fought with dogged determination. Russian army commanders noted the
effectiveness of the Cossacks in Georgia which appears to be why the
Cossacks showed up in Donbas so quickly. The big difference is that
Russian forces soon withdrew from most of Georgia while in Donbas
the conflict has gone on for months.

Paramilitary forces and semi-standing armies of “volunteers”,
of various ethnic and political lines, are a major part of armed
conflict in Russia and the former Soviet Union, particularly among
Slavic ethnicities. Such forces exist in disputed territories between
Armenia and Azerbaijan, where a majority of ethnic Armenians live in
the unrecognized Republic of Nogorno-Karabakh. The Nogorno-Karabakh
Defense Army is the formal defense force of the Nogorno-Karabakh
Republic. Similar forces exist in both breakaway republics of South
Ossetia and Azkaban. Now Cossacks are trying to settle down in eastern
Ukraine (parts of which were once “Cossack lands”).

The new Russian policy is to encourage, with cash investments and
monthly payments to adult Cossacks willing to undergo military
training, the establishment of Cossack communities in the Caucasus.

These towns and villages would be in touch with the surrounding
non-Cossack population and able, if there were problems with the
natives, to defend themselves until Russian reinforcements show up.

That’s a strategy that is centuries old and Russia sees it
as succeeding again. The Caucasus natives have a long-standing
dislike for the Cossacks, but at the same time fear and respect them,
especially when the Cossacks are acting as paramilitary forces. But
in Ukraine the Cossacks often led Ukrainian rebellions against the
Russian government. That distant memory is now being reexamined in
Moscow and the policies of how to use the Cossacks being reconsidered.

http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/20150203.aspx

James Warlick: We Plan To Negotiate With Aliyev And Sargsyan

JAMES WARLICK: WE PLAN TO NEGOTIATE WITH ALIYEV AND SARGSYAN

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 3 2015

3 February 2015 – 2:23pm

The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group are deeply concerned by the
serious violence which recently occurred on the contact line, the US
co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group James Warlick said in an interview
to the Voice of America.

According to him, the recent incidents in Nagorno-Karabakh and the
escalating violence directly harm all countries in the region.

“We plan to visit the region soon and to hold talks with all parties,
and also with the presidents,” the co-chair of the OSCE Minsk Group
said.

Permyakov Will Go On Trial In Gyumri

PERMYAKOV WILL GO ON TRIAL IN GYUMRI

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 3 2015

3 February 2015 – 2:58pm

Russian serviceman Valery Permyakov, who is accused of murdering
a family of seven in Armenia’s northern city of Gyumri, will go on
trial in Armenia on the premises of Russia’s military base there,
sources familiar with the situation said.

“Since the crime of the Avetisyan family’s murder is being investigated
simultaneously by the Russian and Armenian sides, they are considering
the possibility of adopting a joint, consolidated indictment based
on Russian penal laws,” one of the sources said.

“Everything that has been developed by Armenian investigators will
be transferred to the Russian side to be attached to the case file,”
the source noted.

As Vestnik Kavkaza previously reported, a family of six, including
a two-year-old child, were murdered in Gyumri, northern Armenia,
on January 12. The only survivor, six-month-old Sergei Avetisyan,
was hospitalized with stab wounds. He died on January 19.

The murder caused a wide resonance in Armenian society. As a result
of the negotiations of the Investigative Committees of Russia and
Armenia, an agreement to establish a headquarters to coordinate the
investigation was signed. It was agreed that Russian and Armenian
investigators will conduct a joint investigation, and the trial and
investigation into the murders will be held in Armenia.

The Press Secretary of the President of Russia, Dmitry Peskov,
commenting on the incident in Gyumri, said the case will be considered
by a Russian court.

From: A. Papazian

http://vestnikkavkaza.net/news/society/65717.html

Armenian Prosecutors Want Materials On Murder Of Gyumri Family

ARMENIAN PROSECUTORS WANT MATERIALS ON MURDER OF GYUMRI FAMILY

Vestnik Kavkaza, Russia
Feb 3 2015

3 February 2015 – 8:26pm

Armenian Prosecutor General Gevork Kostanyan has sent his Russian
counterpart Yuri Chayka a request for materials on the murder of seven
members of the Avetisyan family by Russian soldier Valery Permyakov
in Gyumri, Interfax reports.

The murder happened on January 12.