Armenian Singers Boycott Eurovision Song Contest 2012 In Baku

ARMENIAN SINGERS BOYCOTT EUROVISION SONG CONTEST 2012 IN BAKU

armradio.am
24.02.2012 14:22

A group of Armenian singers have released a statement addressed to
the European Broadcasting Union and the Armenian Public TV Company
saying they will not participate in the Eurovision Song Contest 2012,
which will take place in Baku. The statement reads, in part:

“Armenian soldier Albert Adibekyan was shot dead by an Azerbaijani
sniper near the village of Chinari in Tavush region. And this
happens at a time when the mediators in the negotiation process of
the Karabakh conflict have several times called on the conflicting
parties to withdraw snipers from the Line of Contact.

The Armenian side has always declared it is ready to withdraw its
snipers, while Azerbaijan, as we can see, not only does not accept
the proposal but also takes advantage of every occasion to shed the
blood of Armenians.

Under these circumstances we, the undersigned, are stating in public
that we have the most serious reservation over Armenia’s participation
in the Eurovision to be held in Baku.

Armenia has taken part in all Eurovision song contests, including the
junior ones. However, the perspective of holding this year’s contest in
Baku has been severely criticized by NGOs and politicians of a number
of countries, as well as international organizations. We are declaring
that we refuse to take part in the contest to be held in Baku.

We refuse to perform in a country that is notorious for its mass
killings and massacres of Armenians, a country where anti-Armenian
sentiment is part of state policy, a country where ethnic Armenians
are denied entry, even if they are citizens of other countries.”

The singers recalled the killing of Armenian Officer Gurgen Margaryan
during NATO classes in Budapest in 2004, noting that this can happen
to every Armenian singer or member of the delegation.

“We refuse to perform in a country, which organized mass killings in
Sumgayit, Kirovabad, Baku, Mingechaur and Maragha, a country, which
attacked the peaceful population of Nagorno Karabakh and continue
threatening to kill Armenians. All this happens on the level of the
President and different state bodies, which have been disseminating a
feeling of revenge and hatred towards Armenians among their citizens,”
the singers wrote.

They called on the Public Television to refuse from sending a
participant to that country and declared that they will participate in
Eurovision 2012 should the European Broadcasting Union decide to move
the contest to any other country, adding that they will participate
in all future Eurovision Song Contests.

Environmentalist: We See Positive Shift In Lake Sevan

ENVIRONMENTALIST: WE SEE POSITIVE SHIFT IN LAKE SEVAN

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

Studies in Lake Sevan show a positive shift, with water becoming
clearer and more transparent, head of Association “For Sustainable
Human Development” Karine Danielian told a news conference in Yerevan.

A UN-funded study in Lake Sevan, with leading experts in the field,
revealed positive results, the environmentalist said. There are now
biological species in the lake which are only found in clear water,
according to her.

Mrs Danielyan also dwelt on the environmental problems of Lake Sevan
such as coastal areas, water pollution caused by mining activities.

The environmentalist promised to spare no effort to give solution to
these problems.

Sumgait – Unpunished Genocide

SUMGAIT – UNPUNISHED GENOCIDE

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

On February 26-29, 1988, with the actual support of the Azerbaijani
authorities and the connivance of the Soviet leadership, a massacre
of Armenians was carried out in the city of Sumgait, the Azerbaijani
Soviet Socialist Republic, which shocked the international community
with its savagery and brutality.

The Sumgait massacre of Armenians was committed in response to the
Karabakh people’s legitimate expression of will for reunification
with Armenia and became the embodiment of the Azerbaijani authorities’
policy of hatred towards Armenians conducted during the entire Soviet
period. The mass pogroms of Armenians in ‘international’ Sumgait were
intended to block a possible solution to the issue, to frighten the
Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh with the prospects of new bloody actions
and to make them abandon their national-liberation movement. Dozens
of people were killed with sadistic cruelty; a considerable part of
them was burned alive after having been beaten, tortured, and violated.

Hundreds of people were disabled for life and thousands became
refugees…

“After Stalin’s atrocities nothing took place in our country to
throw us so far back – from civilization to savagery”, wrote those
days scientists from Moscow in their “Open letter to the friends
in Armenia”.

The massacre of Armenians in Sumgait was thoroughly organized,
including from the ideological and psychological points of view. At
the anti-Armenian gathering-like rallies, which started on February
26 in the central square, the municipal leaders openly called upon
the participants for violence against the Armenians.

On February 27, the ‘rallies’ escalated into acts of violence. The
first ‘rally’ in front of the building of the Sumgait City Party
Committee was attended by about 50 people; the next day, the number
of participants grew to several thousands. In her speech, Second
Secretary of the City Party Committee Melek Bairamova demanded that
Armenians left Azerbaijan; Azerbaijani poet Khydyr Alovlu concluded
his speech by saying: “Death to Armenians!”

In addition to the city leadership, representatives of the law
enforcement agencies were on the tribune, and it wasn’t accidental
that unprecedented facts of inaction and heartlessness of the Interior
employees were fixed during the pogroms.

Following is a fragment from the indictment on criminal case 18/60233
on accusation of Akhmed Imani ogly Akhmedov, Ilham Azat ogly Ismailov,
and Yavar Giyas ogly Jafarov: “Answering the question of lawyer
Shaposhnikova “Why did you not call your father, who was in service
then, to tell him about what was happening in your block?”, witness D.

Zarbaliev (the witness’ father worked in the militia in Sumgait) said:
“And why did I need to call? The militia knew about it; everybody
knew about it. It was not the first day of the pogroms”.

An open atmosphere of mass psychosis and hysteria was formed at the
‘rallies’. Those on the tribunes called upon the rally participants to
be true to the credit of the Muslims and to unite in a war against the
‘infidels’. The thugs were inflamed by, actually, fascist appeals,
heated by alcohol, which was distributed freely out of trucks, and
drugged; convinced of their own impunity, they continued with renewed
impetus the pogroms of Armenians’ apartments, their mass beating
and killing, which lasted until late at night. The crowd was headed
by none other than First Secretary of the Sumgait City Committee of
the Communist Party Jahangir Muslimzade, with the national flag of
Azerbaijan in his hands. The gangs were headed also by some prominent
people in Sumgait – the director of secondary school #25, an actress
of the Arablinsky Theater, and others.

“In peacetime, the Soviet Union had never experienced what happened
then. Gangs of about ten to fifty or more people strolled through the
city, broke windows, burned cars, but the main thing was that they
were looking for Armenians”, wrote Rodina (Motherland) magazine (#
4, 1994, pp. 82-90).

On February 28, the number of thugs armed with iron bars, axes,
hammers, and other improvised means considerably increased. The crowd
clearly knew its tasks. The pogrom-makers, who were divided into
groups, broke into Armenians’ apartments and killed the people in
their own homes; but more often they took them out in the street or in
the yard for making a public mock of them. After painful humiliation,
the victims were poured with petrol and burned alive.

Following is a fragment from Hasan Mamedov’s testimony (record of
a judicial hearing, Moscow, USSR, the Supreme Court, October 18 –
November 18, 1988):

“I saw that a middle-aged man was brought out of the entrance and
beaten, mostly from behind… He was lying about three meters from
me. A fire was burning nearby. Nizami Mageramov took the guy’s legs
and Fizuli Fataliyev took his hands; they lifted the guy off the ground
and threw him into the fire. His body turned out to be in the fire and
his legs were out of it. I saw it clearly, as it was light. The guy
thrown into the fire still showed signs of life. I determined this,
seeing how he was trying to roll out of the fire. But, a guy in a black
jacket and jeans was holding the guy down in the fire with a piece
of reinforcement rod, preventing him from rolling out of the fire…”

Only on February 29 military forces were brought into the city of
Sumgait, but they did not immediately establish control over the city.

The killings and pogroms of Armenians were going on. Only in the
evening the military units started taking decisive actions.

The central authorities were not interested in establishing the exact
number of victims in the Sumgait bacchanalia. Officially, 36 Armenian
and 6 Azerbaijani deceased persons were stated. Meanwhile, British
researcher Tom de Waal wrote in his book Black Garden. Between Peace
and War: “…If you pay attention to the serial numbers of medical
death certificates, you’ll find out that at least 115 bodies were
recorded those days in the morgues… Such a number of natural deaths
is excluded, at least because no more than 72 deaths were registered
in the previous two months” (“February 1988: Azerbaijan”, chapter 2).

The fact that the Genocide of the Armenian population of Sumgait
was planned in advance and was not a spontaneous action of a group
of hooligans, as the Soviet authorities and judicial agencies tried
to present it, is testified by some irrefutable facts: production
of cold arms for the pogroms at the industrial enterprises of the
city; making lists of the Armenians living in the city with the aim
of their killing; the authorities’ inaction; speeches of specially
trained provokers at the rallies for manipulating the crowd; the
local militia’s assistance to the thugs; disconnecting the phones
in the Armenians’ apartments; cutting off the electricity supply in
the blocks where the pogroms were going on; accurate coordination
of the gangs’ actions; providing the thugs with reinforcement rods,
pipe scraps, rocks and bottles with gasoline and alcohol; blocking the
entrances to the city by armed groups; lack of any assistance to the
victims by medical workers of the city; removal of the crimes’ traces
(hasty repair of the smashed shops, apartments, and other facilities),
and hiding the organizers and many executors of the Genocide from
the justice.

Following is a fragment from the indictment on criminal case 18/60233
on accusation of Akhmed Imani ogly Akhmedov, Ilham Azat ogly Ismailov,
Yavar Giyas ogly Jafarov: Witness M. Ilyasov, Russian: “From the window
of my apartment I saw a GAS-24 black car to drive up to our block. This
car was approached by two men out of the crowd… Without leaving the
car, the men sitting in it said something to those who had come up
to them, and they immediately went back into the crowd. After that,
the pogroms started with renewed fury… I think they fixed in advance
the addresses of the Armenians. I came to this conclusion, because the
killers entered accurately the entrances where the Armenians lived…

All this was not an act of hooliganism; it was an action against
a particular nation, against the Armenians. It was not against the
Russians or some other nations, it was against the Armenians; they
were looking for only Armenians”.

“Witness S. Guliyev said at the hearing: “Those people were gathered
together more than one day, as it is impossible to gather thousands
of people in one day.”

“Witness M. Mamedov: “The megaphone-holder (Ahmed Ahmedov) announced
that the crowd did not need to smash the apartments, as they would
remain to them, they only needed to kill the Armenians”.

“Witness T. Tahmazov, apartment block manager: “Representative of the
Azerbaijani Communist Party Central Committee Ganifaeva instructed
the rally participants to burn all the smashed things and cover them
with ground. They did so, and very quickly. The next morning, the City
Executive Committee sent repair and construction teams to block 412
‘a’ for removing the bodies and the smashed things”.

Sumgait Communist newspaper (#57, May 13, 1988) wrote: “In the days
of the heavy situation, axes, knives, and other items that could
be used by hooligan elements were made in the shop of the factory
(tube-rolling)”.

It is quite obvious that some persons, who were not identified as
a result of the investigation, had created favorable conditions for
carrying out the mass massacre of Armenians.

On February 29, 1988, a session of the Politburo of the USSR Communist
Party Central Committee took place in the Kremlin, at which it was
stated for the first time officially, though classified as ‘top
secret’, that the mass pogroms and massacre had been carried out in
Sumgait on an ethnic basis, that is exclusively against Armenians.

However, the USSR official structures were quick to taboo the topic of
‘Sumgait’, artificially dividing the mass slaughter of Armenians into
separate crimes. The crimes, which, according to the International
Convention on Genocide, must be assessed as crimes against the
humanity, were classified as crimes committed out of ‘hooliganism
motives’. In other words, the committed Genocide was veiled, and its
organizers were defended at the official level.

In particular, employees of the municipal and law enforcement agencies
remained unpunished, though many witnesses stated some well-known
persons in the city, who were directly involved in the ‘rallies’.

Moreover, Sumgait Prosecutor Ismet Gaibov, less than a year after the
massacre of Armenians in the city, where he ‘carried out’ the control
over law and order, was… appointed Prosecutor General of Azerbaijan.

Only the Communist leader of Sumgait Muslimzade was dismissed from his
position, though he wasn’t either brought to justice. It is rather
because at the next plenary session of the Azerbaijani Communist
Party Central Committee well-informed Muslimzade directly accused the
Republic’s leadership of organizing the massacre: “On May 21, 1988,
at the plenary session of the Azerbaijani SSR Communist Party Central
Committee, the former First Secretary of the Sumgait City Committee of
the Communist Party blamed also the Republic’s leaders for the tragic
events in Sumgait. The day before, he stated considerable details
of this at the Bureau of the Azerbaijani Communist Party Central
Committee, when his personal responsibility was discussed, what can be
found in the verbatim records” (the Epoch , # 4, September 13, 1990).

Unfortunately, the February 27-29 pogroms in Sumgait, organized at
the highest state level, are not given yet an adequate political and
legal assessment, and the Moscow trial did not become the Nuremberg
trial, because the roots of the mass crimes were not identified.

The policy of silence related to the Genocide in Sumgait, concealment
of the reasons, which gave rise to it, and leaving its real organizers
unpunished made possible the ethnic cleansing carried out by the
Azerbaijani SSR authorities throughout the Republic, which culminated
in the January 1990 bloody bacchanalia in the Republic’s capital city
of Baku and led to further large-scale military aggression against
the people of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic.

Meanwhile, the truth about Sumgait, like the materials of the Nuremberg
trial, is needed to the people for preventing a new ‘brown plague’.

ARF To Hold Action In Support Of Proportional Representation System

ARF TO HOLD ACTION IN SUPPORT OF PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION SYSTEM

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

At the request of the parliamentary opposition, the Armenian parliament
will discuss on February 28 a proposal enjoying wide public support,
envisaging amendments to the Electoral Code and adopting a 100-percent
proportional representation system.

ARF plans an action in support of a 100-percent proportional
representation system near the National Assembly simultaneously with
the meeting, according to ARF Bureau press office.

From: A. Papazian

K. Avagyan: Azerbaijan’s Insidious Policy Leaves Casualties

K. AVAGYAN: AZERBAIJAN’S INSIDIOUS POLICY LEAVES CASUALTIES

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

“Azerbaijan continues its insidious policy leaving casualties as an
aftermath,” Karen Avagyan, head of NATO PA Armenian delegation, told
Panorama.am remarking on a casualty registered on February 23 as an
Armenian armed forces soldier was shot dead by an Azerbaijani sniper.

OSCE and UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon called on the parties to
withdraw snipers from the front line. Armenian side has repeatedly
declared it was supporting the initiative. While the Azerbaijani
side maintains a position that withdrawal of snipers doesn’t meet
any problem. According to Azerbaijani “Doctrina” organization eight
Azerbaijani soldiers were killed in 2011, though informal data refer
to several dozens of casualties.

The MP has underlined it’s obvious why Azerbaijan refuses the
withdrawal of snipers.

“Azerbaijan creates obstacles for the negotiating process and proves
another time that is not committed to agreements reached beforehand,”
he said.

Armenian Armed Forces soldier Albert Armenaki Adibekyan was shot dead
on Thursday at 13:50 by an Azerbaijani sniper in a military position
located near Chinari village.

Scandalous Revelations Expected In Ministry Of Transport

SCANDALOUS REVELATIONS EXPECTED IN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

The Control Chamber of Armenia carries out monitoring in the Armenian
Ministry of Transport and Communication. According to Zhoghovurd
daily, scandalous revelations can be made in the Ministry, as member
of Orinats Yerkir Party Manuk Vardanyan did “some suspicious business”
with his former colleague Eduard Madatyan.

The daily enquired from Minister of Transport Manuk Vardanyan whether
the Control Chamber carries out monitoring in the Ministry. “Yes,”
unwillingly answered the Minister.

“Do you have the apprehension that corruption revelations can be made
in the competitions announced by the Ministry?” asked the daily.

“No, certainly not. I am confident,” answered the Minister briefly.

Levon Sargsyan Sells His Businesses In Armenia

LEVON SARGSYAN SELLS HIS BUSINESSES IN ARMENIA

Panorama.am
24/02/2012

Republican MP Levon Sargsyan (Lyov of the Flour Mill) has sold all
his businesses in Armenia. Rumors circulate that Levon Sargsyan is
founding business in Sochi.

His Akhtamar restaurant in Sevan has not yet been sold, rumors say
that he fails to agree on price, Chorrord Inknishkhanutyun reports.

FIDH And CSI Demand Fair Trial And Independent Investigation In The

FIDH AND CSI DEMAND FAIR TRIAL AND INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION IN THE STEPAN HOVAKIMYAN AND VAHRAM KEROBYAN CASE

hetq
16:34, February 23, 2012

Paris – Yerevan, 22 February, 2012. Two years have passed since
Stepan Hovakimyan was charged on 6 February 2010 with organizing and
committing theft at the “Moskva” cinema house on 10 January 2010.

On 6 February 2010, Hovakimyan was charged with violations of Article
177(3)(1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia and detained
after spending 72 hours in police custody. To this day Hovakimyan
and Kerobyan (also later arrested) remain in detention at Nubarashen
penitentiary institution. Their trials continue to be unduly delayed
and no independent and fair investigation has yet been conducted.

Despite two years to further corroborate the charges in his case, the
principal evidence against Hovakimyan remains a confession statement
obtained by police using duress and psychological violence on 6
February 2010.

Hovakimyan had already attended Yerevan police station on 11 and
14 January 2010, where he remained in custody for over 10 hours and
was allegedly subjected to violent treatment, before being released
without confessing.

On 6 February 2010 Stepan Hovakimyan again attended Yerevan police
department where he was subjected to torture and inhumane and degrading
treatment. In the course of this treatment Hovakimyan was beaten on the
head, undressed, had his shoes removed and the soles of his feet beaten
with a rubber baton until he confessed to theft. He claims to have been
invited to the Yerevan police department on that occasion without a
proper summons and before any complaint had been lodged by the victim
or criminal proceedings instituted. Only after signing the confession
statement was S. Hovakimyan permitted to inform his relatives of his
custody, and given access to a lawyer for the first time.

Having been implicated in conniving in the theft in S. Hovakimyan’s
confession statement, V. Kerobyan was arrested on 12 March 2010. He
remains detained and charged with theft to date.

Hovakimyan’s complaint concerning torture on 6 February 2010, lodged
with the Special Investigation Service (SIS), proved unsuccessful. SIS
decided not to institute criminal proceedings against those
responsible, relying instead on the police officers’ explanations of
events and declining to investigate the torture allegations further.

This decision was appealed in the Court of General Jurisdiction
of the Kentron and Nork-Marash districts, but rejected on 2 August
2011. A subsequent appeal to the Court of Appeals culminated in the
first instance judgment being upheld on 26 December 2011 – a ruling
is currently lodged for appeal before the Court of Cassation. An
admissibility decision on this latest appeal is currently pending.

FIDH and the Civil Society Institute call upon the Armenian authorities
to:

Immediately release S.Hovakimyan and V. Kerobyan on bail; Ensure
both accused receive a fair trial within a reasonable time, including
by confirming the inadmissibility of evidence obtained by coercion;
Conduct an independent, effective and thorough investigation into the
torture allegations to identify the perpetrators and bring them to
justice; Fully conform with the provisions of the European Convention
on Human Rights, as well as the European Convention on the Prevention
of Torture and the UN Convention against Torture and other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. These texts impose a
clear obligation on Armenia to investigate and prosecute allegations
of torture and stop the practice of using confessions obtained under
duress to prosecute suspects.

Rep. Schiff Mystified By Court Decision On Armenian Genocide Insuran

REP. SCHIFF MYSTIFIED BY COURT DECISION ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE INSURANCE LAW

PanARMENIAN.Net
February 24, 2012 – 10:47 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – U.S. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) released the following
statement after the 9th Circuit ruled in the Movsesian v. Versicherung
case, effectively barring Armenian-Americans from seeking the return
of stolen Armenian Genocide-era insurance assets through U.S. courts,
under California law:

“I am deeply disappointed and mystified by this decision and cannot
see how the 9th Circuit could have reached such a flawed legal
conclusion. I will be studying the decision in the coming days and
will be working with my friends in the Armenian-American community
to determine next steps.

“I was proud to submit an amicus brief on behalf of genocide victims
and their families, and I am more than willing to do so again with
the United States Supreme Court.”

Expert: In Case Of War In Iran, Azerbaijan Will Prefer Its Security

EXPERT: IN CASE OF WAR IN IRAN, AZERBAIJAN WILL PREFER ITS SECURITY TO KARABAKH

PanARMENIAN.Net
February 24, 2012 – 13:26 AMT

PanARMENIAN.Net – In case of a war in Iran, Azerbaijan will first of
all consider its security rather than Karabakh, director of Noravank
Research Foundation Gagik Harutyunyan said.

Touching upon the recent statements of Azerbaijani side on Iran’s
involvement in Karabakh process, Harutyunyan told a press conference
in Yerevan: “Azerbaijan’s statements on Iran’s involvement in Karabakh
conflict resolution is the result of propaganda. However, the tensions
between Azerbaijan and Iran should also be taken into account.”

As to Russia’s role in the region and the settlement of Karabakh
conflict, Harutyunyan mentioned that the recent statements voiced by
CSTO Secretary General Nikolai Bordyuzha prove Russia’s determination
in taking active steps aimed at settlement of regional problems.

The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) won’t get involved
in Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, as it is the responsibility
of relevant international mechanisms to demonstrate oriented activity
aimed at achieving conflict resolution, CSTO Secretary General told
Yerevan-Moscow-Astana-Kyiv-Chisinau space bridge.

“As a full-fledged member of CSTO, Armenia will receive appropriate
assistance when necessary,” Nikolai Bordyuzha said.

He further noted that “CSTO has both political and peacekeeping
potential to respond to crisis development of Karabakh conflict.”

“Everything depends on specific assessment of the situation,” he said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress