Parliament President Talks Of Germany’S ‘Difficult’ History

PARLIAMENT PRESIDENT TALKS OF GERMANY’S ‘DIFFICULT’ HISTORY
By Martin Banks

The Parliament

Feb 8 2012
Belgium

Parliament’s president Martin Schulz has spoken of the “demons” of
Germany’ past during a press conference discussion on the ‘Armenian
genocide’ of 1915-16.

The German deputy made an impassioned reference to his country’s
“difficult” past after a meeting with Egemen Bagis, the Turkish
minister for EU affairs and chief negotiator in its accession
negotiations.

In a briefing with journalists after their meeting, Bagis and Schulz
commented on the ‘Armenian genocide’ and a new bill recently adopted
by the French senate.

The bill will make it illegal to deny that the mass killing of
Armenians in 1915 in the Ottoman empire was genocide. The bill has
infuriated the Turkish establishment, which has threatened France
with permanent sanctions.

There is general agreement that hundreds of thousands of Armenians
died when the Ottoman Turks deported them en masse from eastern
Anatolia to the Syrian desert and elsewhere in 1915-16.

The deported Armenians were either killed or died from starvation
or disease.

The total number of Armenian dead is disputed. Armenians say 1.5
million died. The Republic of Turkey estimates the total to be 300,000.

According to the international association of genocide scholars
(IAGS), the death toll was “more than a million”.

Bagis refused to be drawn on an investigation launched by Switzerland
for remarks in which he allegedly denied the ‘genocide’ took place.

He said: “Switzerland is not member of the EU and I will not spend
one second to talk about non EU issue”.

Speaking alongside Bagis on Tuesday, Schulz underlined the “clear
position” of parliament, which in a resolution in 2005 called on
“Turkey to recognise the Armenian genocide and considers this
recognition to be a prerequisite for accession to the EU”.

Schulz, in his first month as president of parliament, went on,
“As a German I know also the history of my own country and the role
the imperial army of Germany played in previous times.

“Nevertheless, my recommendation to the Turkish authorities is the
same as it was in previous times. You should face your own history
and you should allow independent inquiries about your history.

“If the independent inquiries come to the conclusion that it was
genocide, you should recognise it, but I think it’s first up to Turkey
to solve the problem. I respect the parliamentarian autonomy and the
independence of the French parliament and respect the law adopted
in France.

“‘I know that there are a lot of people in the EU sharing the views
of the French MPs,” Schulz added.

The Socialist member went on, “As a German and especially as German
president of multinational parliament, I have to live every day with
our past, which is not an easy past.

“It is a very difficult one. Demons of the past are lasting until
today, every day I am confronted with the past of my country.

“But my country, and I am proud of this, during the last six decades
is facing its own history; is recognising not to be guilty – because
our generation is not guilty for the crimes committed in the past.

“But we are responsible for avoiding that it could happen once more.

To be as open as possible to the past is the best way to the future,”
Schulz said.

http://www.theparliament.com/latest-news/article/newsarticle/parliament-president-talks-of-germanys-difficult-history/

Moscow And "Trialeti Ossetia"

MOSCOW AND “TRIALETI OSSETIA”

Experts’ club

Feb 8 2012
Georgia

08/02/2012 09:00
Giorgi Tsiklauri

New hotbeds of future conflict

An uneasy conscience betrays itself – meaning of this proverb was
fully demonstrated by spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
of Russia, when he made a statement that official Tbilisi supposedly
tried to prevent residents of North Ossetia-Alania from visiting
neighbouring Kazbegi region of Georgia. And, probably, Alexander
Lukashevich deserves to be thanked for the fact that he drew attention
to a subject, relevance of which is gradually increasing.

“In North Ossetia, there are quite a few natives of the Kazbegi
district, those who have relatives there, homes. And it is at exactly
this kind of people of the borderland who are ethnic Ossetians that
restrictive measures of the authorities of Georgia are aimed at –
Russian diplomat says. – A relevant database was created at the
Kazbegi checkpoint for this category of persons and their relatives.

They are not allowed to enter Georgia”. In this connection the
Russian Foreign Ministry did not fail to declare that “facts of open
discrimination of Ossetians on the Georgian border are again confirmed:
slogans of” all Caucasian Friendship” is just a hypocritical cover
for the provocative and continuously chauvinistic policy of Tbilisi.”

Before turning to reasons, which actually caused the righteous anger
of the Russian Foreign Ministry, we should remind one fact: every
state has the sovereign right to refuse entry to any foreigner whose
presence in its territory it for some reason considers undesirable.

And at that the state does not have to explain reasons for the
refusal. But for some reason we have to repeatedly remind Moscow about
this universal rule, which is daily followed all over the world, –
Moscow whose baggage of similar actions is certainly not comparable
with the Georgian experience. Though, entry on the Russian borders is
suspiciously often denied to such undesirable persons, as journalists,
human rights activists and dissidents. The category of citizens that
may encounter problems on the border of Georgia was mentioned already
and will be discussed below in more details, taking into account,
as they like to repeat in Russia, “new realities”.

We should also dwell on bogey of “Georgian chauvinism,” image of
which is so carefully nurtured in Moscow. A decent person, unlike Mr.

Lukashevich, generally would not touch this topic. Because an official
representative of the country in which clashes among ethnic groups,
murders on national and racial grounds, marches with swastikas and
Nazi salutes under the walls of the Kremlin have become the norm,
should be ashamed to rant about someone else’s chauvinism. The more
shameful it must be to “incriminate” neighbours, who, in response to
these farfetched claim, can bring out an example of very real campaign
of the 2006 mass deportation of Georgians from Russia and many other
shameful examples, using more offensive words than “chauvinism”
at that.

However, “there is no smoke without fire” and the words of Lukashevich
must be due to something. Let’s try to figure out what exactly is a
reason behind them …

On January 30th Georgian Deputy Foreign Minister commented on the
statement of the Russian colleague. David Jalagania described
Alexander Lukashevich’s accusations as “cynical” and recalled
how zealously Moscow protested in October 2010 in connection with
the decision of Georgia to remove visa restrictions for the North
Caucasians – and now it turns out, it is protesting for exactly the
opposite reason. Meanwhile, according to official data of the Georgian
Interior Ministry, in 2011 the Kazbegi-Larsi checkpoint – the only
legal checkpoint on the Georgian-Russian land border was crossed by
more than 191 thousand people. Out of which, the largest group, or
99,000, were Russian citizens. Of which the non-visa regime introduced
by Tbilisi for the North Caucasus, was mostly enjoyed by residents of
North Ossetia-Alania – more than 8 600 visitors. In second place, far
behind are residents of Dagestan – about 2 000. They are followed by
residents of Kabardino-Balkaria – 690 visitors, Adygea – 574, Chechnya
– 334, Karachaevo-Cherkessia – 317, and Ingushetia – 28 people.

But let’s leave aside the official statistics and take a look on the
internet. The blogosphere, which has become one of the best indicators
of modern life, presents a number of positive stories and trip reports
of North Caucasians in Georgia. Moreover, Ossetians, once again,
dominate. But then complaints about the refusal of entry and evidence
of discriminatory treatment are somehow nowhere to be seen on the
internet. With one exception and this exception is Vladikavkaz-based
organization Darial. It is its members that from time to time organize
press-conferences in the capital of North Ossetia and complain to
the press about the closed Georgian border. The last such meeting
was held on January 27th suspiciously in sync with the statement of Mr.

Lukashevich and in its content it was a little more detailed account
of his claims. These claims, we note, also highlight “natives of
Kazbegi district” – that is, a group of Ossetians, which, according
to a legend, is represented by the Vladikavkaz-based Darial.

According to the legend, the organization advocates for the cause of
nearly two thousand former residents of Georgia, ethnic Ossetians,
who, because of climatic and socio-economic conditions moved to North
Ossetia in 2006, when Russia closed the border and found themselves
cut off from their homes. And now it’s the Georgian authorities that
prevent them from visiting their native land. But this is the latest,
“soft” version, which apparently Darial deemed necessary to use to
achieve their goals on the humanitarian line in a more persuasive
manner. While in earlier versions, instead of social roots of the
problem main role was played by Georgians-Nazis who en masse banished
Ossetians from the Kazbegi district, and other tales of this kind.

And, since this region is indeed closely connected to Ossetia, and a
lot of the Ossetians really lived (and live to this day) it is easy
for Darial to, if necessary, present before the press some of the
local natives, who will speak before a camera all that organizers need.

The point of this effort is to introduce into the information space
a thesis of presence of a hitherto unknown “disputed territories” –
that is, it is about creating an ideological base for the expansion
of geography of the Georgian-Russian conflict. Representatives of
Darial have already started to call on human rights organizations –
together with such distinguished human rights activists as Vladimir
Putin and Eduard Kokoity – “to give a legal assessment to actions of
the Georgian government towards indigenous inhabitants of the region –
Ossetians.” And they also add that “… formerly, Kazbegi district –
gorges of Darial, Tyrsygomsk (Truso – ed.), Guda and Kobi valley-
was the eastern part of the historical Ossetia.”

For the first time Darial made itself known in the middle of 2009 –
a year after the Russian-Georgian war and the occupation of 20% of the
territory of Georgia by Russia. And soon after Eduard Kokoity in April
2009 for the first time said that Tskhinvali regime intended to demand
“return of the Truso gorge to Ossetia which in the twenties of the
XX century was given by the Bolsheviks into the administration of the
Georgian SSR.” Till the end of the 2010 rhetoric of the organization,
which was then very quickly set up in Vladikavkaz, included very few
“human rights” and “humanitarian” notes while territorial claims were
heard in full voice. Chairman of Darial Gairbek Salbiev have never
failed to raise the subject of “native Ossetian lands” whenever he
travelled to Tskhinvali or spoke to reporters in Vladikavkaz. It is
easy to see that the number of “disputed” gorges has since increased.

But this is just the beginning. The worst is still to come when we
look at maps, which is used as illustrations in the Darial-related
publications in the South Ossetian and North Ossetian media.

These maps depict “enhanced”, “historic South Ossetia.” But it is
not only expanded at the expanse of the above-mentioned places. To
the south of the former administrative border of the South Ossetian
Autonomous District is marked yet another and far more extensive
band of the “disputed” territory – it stretches from west to east
following the river Mtkvari (Kura) from the town of Kareli, passing
through Gori and reaching Tbilisi. To the north of outskirts of the
Georgian capital there is a territory that goes up to Truso valley to
which Darial started to lay claims. Together, this means an increase
of the current “South Ossetia” by more than one and a half times. At
that, according to them, “native Ossetian land” includes also (!) the
ancient capital of Georgia – Mtskheta. That’s it. The Jews that have
been living here for over two millennia, for all this time, were
not smart enough to proclaim the place of confluence of the rivers
of Kura and Aragvi a territory of Israel… And here, one relatively
young people that trace their descent to nomads of the steppes, are
suddenly suggesting to find their roots in the mountains, on which
Iberians- ancient Georgians in deep antiquity erected temples to
pagan deities Gats and Gaim …

Let’s summarize. There are some young organization, which declares
that is engaged in human rights and humanitarian activities. But,
this organization began with political activities – in particular,
together with the bandit regime of Kokoity it laid new territorial
claims against Georgia. And today, in a somewhat veiled form it
is promoting relevant ideological base, introducing the concept
of “Ossetian land” with regards of a good half of the region of
Mtskheta-Mtianeti. At the same time they are not yet saying, but
drawing on maps with twice bigger piece of the territory of Shida
Kartli. And suddenly it appears that this organization has a backing of
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. Of course,
there is no evidence – we can only speculate and draw conclusions –
but if someone thinks that the resulting picture has nothing to do
with the Kremlin and the purposeful activity of enemy intelligence,
it can attributed to extreme naivety and lack of familiarity with
similar projects more than enough of which has been seen by Georgia.

Now let’s try to answer a question: how should the Georgian government
react in this regard? There may be several options. However, it is
clear that studying of the Darial activity and compiling dossiers
on members of this organization would be the minimum necessary
operational work that the Georgian counter-intelligence was required
to do immediately. The same as for the preparation of the checkpoint
“black list” of persons who should not be allowed into Georgia in
order prevent activists of Darial from making a provocation. It is
well known how the Russian army loves keep peace (war) and “protect
compatriots” on a foreign soil. And information that the occupants
deployed in the Akhalgori district have been probing opportunity to
save someone else, this time in a nearby Truso gorge, were leaked
in late 2009 and early 2010. And then no one will understand how and
what it was. For example, they are still searching for a mass grave
of Ossetian virgins burned alive in Tskhinvali, but who cares now?

Elementary logic compels to recognize that the complaints of Alexander
Lukashevich and Darial do not sound out of nowhere. And there must
be the database and information on refusals of entry if people who
work in appropriate structures of Georgia have minimum competence
and responsibility. But this concerns not some abstract, innocently
infringed Ossetians, but quite specific individuals associated with
implementation of a particular political project. Ossetians as a whole,
as it was shown above, are actively using visa-free regime better
than others and, for the most part, encounter no problems at all. I
guess we do not need to explain why the Ministry of Interior Affairs
or the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia without significant
reasons will not go into specific detail in their public statements
and draw attention to the work of counterintelligence, giving food
for speculation on this topic.

By the way, with respect to the Russian Foreign Ministry it should be
noted here that the statement of Lukashevich of January 27th was the
first concrete proof that Darial is not a local initiative at the
level of Tskhinvali and Vladikavkaz, and the project, as minimum,
is coordinated with Moscow. So far the public contacts of the
organization did not rise above the protocol meeting with Kokoity
and Mamsurov and in 2011 it was characterized by a sharp decline in
its activities – which can be attributed to the need to smooth out
the initial clumsiness and, after a pause, to remind about it in a
new “humanitarian” aspect. Under such cover which it is possible
to coordinate efforts with the Russian Foreign Ministry too. And
it does not matter who allowed or not allowed across the border –
Georgia is still unlikely to open its doors for activists of Darial –
but it does not stop them to work in the information field. At this
stage, more is not needed. And when it is needed, right people will
be sent into Georgia one way or another. For example, via the already
occupied territory, accompanied by armoured personnel carriers and
with cries in the media about poor citizens of the Russian Federation
that are forced by the Tbilisi regime to resort to extreme measures,
systematically being denied legitimate travel to their native land …

One would put a full stop here, but there are signs that the plan
drawn up in Russia has a much more extensive nature. Have you already
digested historically Ossetian Gori, Mtskheta and Dusheti? Then welcome
to “Trialeti Ossetia”. That was the name given by unknown authors of
Wikipedia a territory area spread on the Trialeti Range between Gori,
Kareli, Khashuri, Borjomi, Tsalka and Caspi, where among Georgian
villages there are compact settlements of Ossetians. Thus, “Trialeti
Ossetia” extends “the expanded South Ossetia” to the south and only
Javakheti region with its dominant share of the Armenian population
is between it and Armenia, where the 102nd Russian military base is
deployed in Gyumri. Does this lead to any thoughts?

The emergence of “Trialeti Ossetia” in virtual space, as well as
materials about “Tyrsyg” occurred in the beginning of 2010, which fits
well in the timing of Darial. Absence of any interviews and articles
in the press, which would theoretically justify claims to cover all
areas south of Tskhinvali, is a little confusing. But that, as they
say, will come with time – the whole project is just three years old
and it has been focused on the Kazbegi region so far. Therefore,
one can only wonder at the fact that another Ossetia has not yet
been found in the Kakheti region – there are compact settlements
of Ossetians there too. However, emergence of “Lagodekhi Ossetia”
is clearly prevented by its location in the extreme east of Georgia
and a lack of communication with the rest of Ossetia – a bad geography
does not appeal to our northern neighbour …

Speaking of geography. If one adds up all the maps with the “native
Ossetian land,” we get a blue dream of Russian superpower supporters:
the Caucasus, completely separated from north to south with “outposts”
of Russia. North Ossetia-Alania, plus the “South Ossetia”, enhanced
by the Georgian Military Highway, and the middle reaches of the Kura,
plus “Trialeti Ossetia” … Plus, as we know from the Russian media,
the “native Armenian Javakhk” and Native Armenian Armenia with the
Russian base and direct access to Iran.

And again, not only Georgia will be cut in half, but the entire
Caucasus, which, in case of realization of this idea, will not be
divided in the North and South Caucasus but into the west and east.

Isolated from each other by massive “Super Ossetia”, which will be
closely tied to Russia by a deadly feud with all the neigh neighbouring
Caucasian nations. No Caucasian integration, no transit routes, no
alternative oil and gas pipelines … Surely, in this picture all those
who follow periodic revelations of Moscow thinkers on the subject of
“de-sovereignization of Georgia”, “a new conquest of the Caucasus”
and other washing-of-boots-in-warm-seas, have already seen familiar
features. That is a development of the process that was initiated
by the Bolsheviks in annexed Georgia in 1922 through the formation
of the South Ossetian region in the lands of Kartli, Imereti, Racha
and Svaneti regions of Georgia.

Obviously the article is largely based on assumptions. But, sure,
on legitimate assumptions – given the recent history of Georgia
and existing situation of today. For it was “little things” like
this that the conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia were started
from at the time, as well as attempts to foment conflicts in other
regions. And now we have the “new realities” in the face of Georgia’s
occupied territories that received Russian recognition and we need
to recognize that correct diagnosis at an early stage is half of
successful treatment of a disease.

Formation of the basis for expanding the geography of the conflict is
just beginning, although its contours have already been marked. And
this is the least calculated on Ossetians living in Georgia – if only
because all too apparent absurdity of the identified claims. It should
be remembered that, despite all the ugly aspects of the conflict
in “South Ossetia” in the early nineties of the last century, the
absolute majority of Ossetians remained “ours” and far ahead of all
other minority groups when it comes to integration. They are actively
represented at all levels – from ministerial to officers and soldiers
that were repelling Russia’s aggression in the vicinity of “sleeping
Tskhinvali.” Therefore, the worst reaction from the Georgian side
would be demonstration of any anti-Ossetian sentiment – which is one
of the goals of this provocation. And the fact that the provocation
will gradually gain momentum is in no doubt after the Russian Foreign
Ministry became involved in the Darial project.

Unfortunately, among the North Ossetian – especially among young
people – the idea of the new “native Ossetian land” in the heart of
Georgia may well take roots. All Caucasians have a soft spot for
all sorts of “upgrades” to their history. And Ossetians were also
placed here out of competition because of their role assigned to
them by the current policy in the Caucasus, and Moscow’s long-term
plans. In a world where they seriously talk about Ossetian Lon-Don
and are ready to move from the shores of Albion in the direction of
ancient Egypt, with its god Os-Ir-Is, “Trialeti Ossetia” is just a
light snack at the feast of ideological pseudo-senility. So, these
ideas will get some “public support” in the North Ossetia-Alania –
enough so that through hyperbolisation of the subject in the media
gradually introduce the thesis of the new “disputed territories”
and create a virtual conflict. In other words – to create a solid
information background to transfer the conflict to the point where,
if Russia suddenly gets another opportunity to pull the strings and
engage in a new “peaceful resolution”…

http://eng.expertclub.ge/portal/cnid__10984/alias__Expertclub/lang__en/tabid__2546/default.aspx

EU Seeks Swifter Resolution To Nagorno Karabakh Conflict

EU SEEKS SWIFTER RESOLUTION TO NAGORNO KARABAKH CONFLICT

New Europe

Feb 8 2012

The European Union would like to launch new ideas in order to promote
quicker settlement of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno Karabakh
conflict.

Head of the EU Delegation to Azerbaijan Ambassador Roland Kobia said:
“We of course support all objectives of the Minsk Group and we would
like also as a request of parties to launch new ideas in order to
promote quicker settlement of the conflict.”

The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
armed forces have occupied 20% of Azerbaijan since 1992, including
the Nagorno-Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts.

Armenia has not yet implemented the UN Security Council’s four
resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
surrounding regions.

According to Kobia, these ideas are still being tested with the
government of Azerbaijan and with the government of Armenia, and they
will be disclosed soon. He said the EU Special Representative for the
South Caucasus Philippe Lefort visited Azerbaijan yesterday and had
meetings with the president, foreign minister, minister of justice,
minister of internal security and other actors.

Kobia added: “But first, we would like to have concrete development
of these ideas. But it is really to try to enhance people-to-people
contact and to generate confidence between the parties. The main
topics of the meetings were the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno Karabakh
conflict.~T

EU HIgh Representative Catherine Ashton also confirmed that the
EU wants to have a more active role in helping the settlement of
Armenian-Azerbaijan Nagorno Karabakh conflict when she visited
Azerbaijan a few months ago.

http://www.neurope.eu/article/eu-seeks-swifter-resolution-nagorno-karabakh-conflict

EU Wants Bigger Role In Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process

EU WANTS BIGGER ROLE IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH PEACE PROCESS

Vestnik Kavkaza
Feb 8 2012
Russia

EU Special Representative Philipp Lefaure met the Azerbaijani
president, ministers of foreign affairs, justice, national security
and other officials in Baku, head of the EU office in Baku, Roland
Kobia, said on Wednesday. One of the main topics for discussion was
the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Trend reports.

Catherine Ashton, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy, confirmed EU’s strive for a bigger role in the
Nagorno-Karabakh peace process on her visit in Azerbaijan several
months ago. The EU supports efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group and has
new ideas to offer to speed up the process if necessary.

Kobia said that the ideas were being discussed by Azerbaijani and
Armenian governments.

From: A. Papazian

Russian,Armenian Security Heads To Discuss Cooperation In Yerevan

RUSSIAN,ARMENIAN SECURITY HEADS TO DISCUSS COOPERATION IN YEREVAN

Vestnik Kavkaza
Feb 8 2012
Russia

Secretary of the Russian National Security Council Nikolai Patrushev
is on a two-day visit to Armenia where he will meet his counterpart
Artur Bagdasaryan, ITAR-TASS reports.

Patrushev will visit Gyumri, the second largest city in Armenia
(former Leninakan) and observe the 102nd Russian military base and
the Krasnoznamenny Border Group of Russia’s FSB.

The Russian military base in Gyumri operates according to the
Russian-Armenian deal. It has some 5,000 servicemen.

The Russian security chief will lay flowers at the Honour Hill, a
memorial for Russian officers who died in Russian-Turkish wars in the
19th century. The complex was opened in 2010, attended by Russian and
Armenian President Dmitry Medvedev and Serzh Srgsyan. The Heroes of
Kars Complex will have a monument set, reconstructed by the Russian
Orthodox Chapel of Saint Archistratig Mikhail. Patrushev will visit
Matenadaran, a research institute for ancient manuscripts in Yerevan.

He will conclude the visit meeting Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan.

Egemen Bagis: Turkey And The EU Have A Common Future

CAUSE AND EFFECT IN EUROPEAN POLITICS AND ECONOMY

Feb 8 2012

Egemen Bagis: Turkey and the EU Have a Common Future

Adelina Marini, Sofia

It is probably different when you have a friend in the EU
institutions. Of course, it is important what that friendship is based
upon and also whether there are expectations this friendship to deliver
something specific. This is what I was thinking while I listened
to the brief press conference of the Turkish chief EU negotiator,
Egemen Bagis, and the new president of the European Parliament,
Martin Schulz. I relied on that news conference very much, because
there were only photos and video footage from the other meetings of
Bagis in Brussels. After all, Turkey is a strategically important
partner of the EU, the oldest candidate for a full membership and at
the moment a very influential player in the Middle East.

A little context

While I was waiting for that press conference to start, I had a few
questions wandering in my mind. Without enlisting them in order of
significance, the first that came across was related to an announcement
I saw on Twitter yesterday (Feb 7), that against the backdrop of the
expectations the Greek coalition government to finalise the text of an
agreement with its creditors and the troika, Turkey had stopped the
gas deliveries for Greece. The news is especially stressful because
it is a signal that maybe Greece is no longer capable of paying
even for its gas deliveries, which means that it is practically
bankrupt. Besides, stopping the deliveries is happening at a time
of one of the severest winters in Europe in general for decades. So,
this question was important to be addressed – what were the reasons
for halting deliveries, could the EU do something, etc. According to
reports in the Turkish NTV, there were technical problems that caused
the stop of gas deliveries from Azerbaijan to Turkey and Iran.

The second question, of course, was related to Turkey’s accession
process, which has been practically stalled since 2010 when during
the Spanish Presidency of the Council was the last time when a chapter
in the negotiations was opened. Since then, the meetings with Turkish
representatives have been growing more and more uncomfortable for the
EU and reveal the growing self-confidence of Turkey as a self-reliant
regional power, which no longer needs the EU but which the Union
needs more and more.

Naturally, the third issue was the Syria situation, against the
backdrop of the Russian and then Chinese veto on a resolution in
the UN Security Council, that caused a wave of disappointment and
even bewilderment.

Syria

The news conference started with pointing out the friendly relations
between Egemen Bagis and Martin Schulz, the purpose of which remained
unclear. The European Parliament chief outlined as an especially
important topic of his discussions with Bagis precisely Syria. “We,
as Europeans, have to be very grateful to the position Turkey chose
regarding Syria”, he said, having in mind the support Turkey stated
for the pro-democratic protests in the country, violently crushed
by Bashar Assad’s regime. And Mr Bagis for his part underlined that
this was the right position, because innocent people were killed. It
is time the international community to work to convince the Syrian
leadership to implement the necessary reforms so that all in Syria
live in prosperity and freedom, he added.

The international community is at the moment with tied hands. The
US has closed its embassy in Damascus, followed by several European
countries. The only connection with Bashar al-Assad’s government is
being maintained by Russia. On February 7th, Sergey Lavrov, Russia’s
foreign minister, visited the country. A fact, which is obviously
not to Turkey’s liking. On Saturday, Turkish Foreign minister Ahmet
Davutoglu said at the annual security conference in Munich that
there was a great danger nuclei of confrontation to be created in the
region. “We do not want the Cold War logic in our system”, he said
and called the Cold War structures in the region to be transformed.

The role Turkey is playing in the region was an occasion Martin Schulz
to say that, because of Syria, Turkey had again proven how important
it was as a strategic partner of the EU “today and in the future”.

Armenia

What caused my perplexity was Schulz’s reaction to a question of
a journalist, regarding an ongoing preliminary investigation in
Switzerland, related to a remark Egemen Bagis made regarding the
events of 1915, which Turkey denies were a genocide against the
Armenian people. For unclear reasons this question evoked laughter
with the European Parliament chief, who in the same time refused
to comment on preliminary investigations. While Egemen Bagis was
answering that question however, Martin Schulz continued to laugh,
finding it hard to repress.

The Turkish minister recalled that his country was ready to confront
its history and to create a committee of international experts on the
Armenian question and reminded about the letter of Premier Erdogan to
the government of Armenia in 2005, in which he says that he is ready
to confront his history and asks whether Armenia is ready to do the
same. In fact, Mr Schulz did not leave the topic without a comment,
saying that he wanted to make a recommendation in his capacity of
a German and especially of a German president of a multinational
European institution, who has to confront his country’s past everyday.

“The demons of our past haunt us even today and every day I face my
country’s past. Our generation is not guilty for crimes committed in
the past but it is responsible to ensure that they do not repeat”.

Turkey and the EU

Was it for the friendly relations with Egemen Bagis or for his
personal convictions, but Martin Schulz called on the European
Union to stick to its promises for Turkey and its membership to
the EU. He recognised that this was a long and difficult way but
that was a promise the EU made for Turkey. Schulz explained that
both discussed the term “European perspective” which, in his words,
was often used for candidate countries. In fact this term is used
especially frequently for countries the membership of which seems
too distant, like for example the Western Balkan nations. According
to Schulz, the European Perspective is a geographic game. This term
means to stick to the commitments Turkey to become a member of the
EU. For his part Egemen Bagis explained that the European perspective
meant that it was time “together to look into the problems, not only
because we have common past and heritage but a common future”.

Cyprus

With his words the Turkish minister for European affairs confirmed
Turkey’s pledge to ignore the EU Council Presidency of Cyprus,
which starts on July 1, unless a solution is found by then to
the Cyprus question. He announced that he and the president of the
European Parliament had committed to assist the presidents of the two
communities – the Turkish and the Greek – to shake hands in agreement
before July, “so that this does not turn into an issue but into a
solution and an opportunity for the EU-Turkey relations”.

For now it is not clear how Bagis’s meeting with EU Enlargement
Commissioner Stefan Fule went by but the video footage reveals very
warm relations. As euinside wrote many times, for long it has been
high time a brand new conversation between the EU and Turkey to take
place on what the relations between them should be, especially against
the background of the really impressing role the country is playing
in the Middle East in a moment when Europe has its throat squeezed
by severe fiscal and economic troubles. To which, by the way, Turkey
also proposes a solution, articulated again by Egemen Bagis – remove
the visas and thus you will boost your economy. Turkey is the only
EU candidate country which is still under a visa regime with the EU.

http://www.euinside.eu/en/news/egemen-bagis-martin-schulz-turkey-and-eu

Turk’s EU Minister Stands By Genocide Comments

TURK’S EU MINISTER STANDS BY GENOCIDE COMMENTS

Emirates 24/7

Feb 8 2012
UAE

Turkey’s EU affairs minister repeated on Tuesday his denial that
Ottoman Turks had committed genocide against Armenians nearly 100
years ago, in a challenge to Swiss officials who are investigating
whether similar comments last month broke the law.

Turkey summoned the Swiss ambassador on Monday to complain about the
decision by Swiss officials to investigate minister Egemen Bagis’s
comments at the World Economic Forum in Davos and also at a concert
in Zurich.

“I said there on that day that what happened in 1915 was not genocide
and I repeat that today. Nobody should doubt that I will give the
same answer every time I am asked,” Bagis told a news conference.

“I don’t recognise any power that can detain any minister of the
Turkish Republic. I am very much at ease on this subject,” he said.
“If necessary I would go again to Davos and say the same thing.”

Swiss anti racism laws make it illegal to deny a genocide.

Last month, the French Senate approved similar legislation, prompting
an angry response from Turkey. Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan
termed the legislation “discriminatory and racist”.

More than 130 lawmakers who had voted against the bill have appealed
to France’s highest court, the Constitutional Council, to overturn
the law, arguing that the events in 1915-17 were still the subject
of historical contention, and the legislation ultimately infringed
the right to free speech.

The court has a month to decide.

Armenia, backed by many historians and parliaments, says about 1.5
million Christian Armenians were killed in what is now eastern Turkey
during World War One in a deliberate policy of genocide ordered by
the Ottoman government.

The Ottoman empire was dissolved at the end of the war, but successive
Turkish governments and the vast majority of Turks believe the charge
of genocide is an insult to their nation. Ankara argues there was
heavy loss of life on both sides during fighting in the region.

An attorney for the Zurich state prosecutor’s office said Swiss
officials had started an initial probe into Bagis’s remarks after
receiving a complaint from the Switzerland-Armenia group. As a
minister, Bagis may enjoy immunity from prosecution.

Swiss authorities have taken legal action against several people who
have denied the Armenian genocide. The most prominent case is the
conviction of Turkish politician Dogu Perincek, who was fined 3,000
Swiss francs in 2007.

http://www.emirates247.com/news/world/turk-s-eu-minister-stands-by-genocide-comments-2012-02-08-1.441893

Unresolved Conflicts Weaken Regional Security

UNRESOLVED CONFLICTS WEAKEN REGIONAL SECURITY

Vestnik Kavkaza
Feb 8 2012
Russia

Artur Bagdasaryan, secretary of the Armenian National Security Council,
has attended a seminar on challenges of South Caucasus in Yerevan,
Armenia Today reports.

The seminar was organized by the Association of Graduates of the
Center named after J. Marshall, Center for European Security Studies
and the US Embassy in Armenia.

Bagdasaryan noted that regional security was weakened by unresolved
conflicts. Yet, Armenia copes with threats to national security and
challenges. Increase of activity in international organizations,
ties with foreign states and settlement of regional problems could
benefit the cause.

The official noted democratic reforms in the Caucasus, cooperation
with international structures, including the Eastern Partnership,
European Neighbourhood Policy, NATO Individuals Partnership Action
Plan, Armenian-Georgian integrated border management. He stressed the
importance of equal opportunities for economic development of Armenia,
Georgia and Azerbaijan.

Sports: Wrestler Nazarian Ponders Comeback

WRESTLER NAZARIAN PONDERS COMEBACK

Shanghai Daily
February 7, 2012 Tuesday
China

DOUBLE Olympic wrestling champion Armen Nazarian is pondering a return
with the lure of a gold medal at the London Olympics on the horizon.

Nazarian, who turns 38 next month, won Greco-Roman gold at the
1996 Atlanta Olympics while competing for Armenia before taking up
Bulgarian citizenship and winning gold at the 2000 Sydney Games. He
took the bronze four years later in Athens. “I haven’t decided yet
but it goes through my mind,” Nazarian, who announced his retirement
in 2009, said yesterday. “I’m still in the gym all the time and I’m
trying to lose some kilos. So if I improve my shape, I’ll probably
compete in the 66kg category at the Olympic qualifications in April.”

International Book Fair Opens In Minsk Today.

INTERNATIONAL BOOK FAIR OPENS IN MINSK TODAY.

TVR

Feb 8 2012
Belarus

Over 20 countries presented their publications. By tradition, the
guest of honor has been selected. This year it was Venezuela. It
officially opened the Year of the Book in Belarus. Armenia is the
central exponent. Yerevan will soon become the World Book Capital.

Over the next four days, visitors and participants of the event will
be able to partake in a number of creative meetings, presentations
and conferences. Not to mention that the Fair showcases an enormous
selection of books.

(Alexander Radzkov, Deputy Head of Presidential Administration
of Belarus)

From: A. Papazian

http://www.tvr.by/eng/culture.asp?id=62220