Istanbul: On active service in eastern Turkey: 1918-1921

ctive-service-in-eastern-turkey-1918-1921.html

On active service in eastern Turkey: 1918-1921

Toby Rawlinson was no ordinary traveller. In 1918, following the
defeat of Ottoman Turkey in World War I, this British army colonel was
one of the officers tasked by Britain to ensure that the terms of the
recently signed armistice were adhered to in the Caucasus and Eastern
Anatolia.

It was mission impossible. Britain, exhausted by the four-year
conflict, lacked both the resources and the will to enforce a largely
unwilling population, inhabiting what was then a remote,
underdeveloped part of the globe, to submit to its
demands. Nonetheless, Rawlinson’s memoir of his post-wartime
experiences, `Adventures in the Near East,’ paints a vivid picture of
a Turkey undergoing the transition from empire to republic.

Across Europe to Ýstanbul

Rawlinson left Britain in mid-February, crossing a wintry Europe in a
`coupe-lit’ train compartment shared with a French medical officer, a
Transylvanian bishop and a Russian general. In Salonika (now
Thessalonica in northern Greece), where he changed trains, his machine
guns and suitcase went missing and were only found with much
difficulty. The 61-hour journey onto Ýstanbul (which he refers to
by its old name of Constantinople, or `Constant,’ British-forces slang
for the imperial capital) was hellish. There was no glass in the
windows of the packed compartments; the weather was either cold,
snowy, rainy or a mixture of all three. Worse was the indignity of
having the contents of a tin of condensed milk `horribly sticky stuff
it is too’ leak all over him one night from the netting rack above
him. The next morning there was a `somewhat animated conversation’
between Rawlinson and the fellow-officer who had placed it there.

Ýstanbul, then under British occupation, impressed Rawlinson when
viewed from the Sea of Marmara. `The situation of the city is
certainly unique throughout the world … it offers a spectacle of
unrivalled splendour … and appears, when the rays of the setting sun
strike its countless golden mosques and minarets, to be a veritable
city of palaces.’ The reality on the ground he found less attractive,
though. `On landing … the disillusionment is both sudden and
complete. Filth and squalour are to be seen everywhere, and the city
of palaces … becomes a collection of hovels and ruins, cropping up
from a sea of mud.’ Although the old walled quarter of the city
disappointed him, Pera (modern Beyoðlu) was more to his
taste. `Here are fine, though steep, streets, pavements, electric
lights and trams, fine buildings, all the evidence of prosperity and
enterprise which distinguish a modern European capital.’

>From the Caucasus to Trabzon

In early March he took a steamer from Ýstanbul to Batumi (in modern
Georgia), then a train onto the Georgian capital, Tbilisi. The train
was guarded by a hundred British infantrymen, as `the country was
infested by bands of Bolshevik and other classes of brigands capable
of any atrocity.’ In Tbilisi, Rawlinson picked up two Ford cars, which
he quickly kitted out with the guns he’d brought from Britain, and
hand picked 14 men to accompany him on his mission. After a brief
foray into the much-disputed and snow-bound province of Kars (now a
part of Turkey), Rawlinson returned to Batumi and took a ship to
Trebizond (modern Trabzon). His mission now was to cross the Pontic
Alps — the lofty mountain range paralleling the eastern Black Sea
coast of Turkey — and liaise with his commander-in-chief in the
strategically crucial northeastern Anatolian city of Erzerum
(Erzurum). The city was the base of the Turkish 9th Army and, under
the terms of the 1918 armistice, the British were supposed to oversee
the demobilization and disarmament of these (and indeed all Ottoman
Turkish) troops. But although Rawlinson was armed with a `firman’
issued by the sultan to ensure the Turkish military complied with his
requests, the Turkish nationalist revolution was, unofficially,
already underway — making his task nigh on impossible given the
limited resources at his disposal.

Over the Pontic Alps to Erzerum

Although it was by now mid-April, the famous 2,010-meter Zigana Pass
was still snow-bound. Today a fine asphalt road and tunnel have tamed
the pass, a mere 110 kilometers from Trabzon, but it took Rawlinson
and his men a day and a half to cross. He was captivated by the view
from the top of Zigana. `We had our first view of Anatolia, and a very
marvelous and beautiful one it was. In the bright morning sun range
after range of snow-capped mountains appeared on every side. …The
impression produced by this remarkable scene was of an incredibly
rocky and rugged country, of precipices and narrow, deep valleys.’
Descending the far side, Rawlinson’s team bivouacked in Gumuþhane,
the next day crossing the Vavok Pass (Vavuk Pass) to Bayburt. Ahead of
them lay the most notorious pass of all, the Kop (2,302 meters), where
`no winter season ever passes without many lives being lost … from
exposure.’ New snow, a savage wind and the steep slope made progress
up the Kop painstaking. Eventually they unloaded their fleet of six
cars and commandeered some local Turkish troops and 40 oxen to help
drag them up the slope. At last they summited and `enjoyed a view
which is unsurpassable in any country.’

Given the ravages of war, its high, exposed position and the fact
that he came down with dysentery here, it is unsurprising that
Rawlinson had a somewhat jaundiced view of Erzerum. `It is a
particularly uninviting spot, which no one who is familiar with that
country would ever voluntarily select as his residence. The wind there
blows with terrific force, and piercing cold defies all furs. … No
tree or shrub of any sort can be found within over 50 miles, either to
afford fuel or shelter of any kind, and the words `dismal,’ `dreary,’
`desolate’ and `damnable’ suggest themselves irresistibly as a concise
description of the whole locality.’ He did, however, get to meet
Kazým Karabekir, who would go on to become a hero of the Turkish
War of Independence. He described Karabekir as `the most genuine
example of a first-class Turkish officer that it has been my good
fortune to meet … although it was my fate to be his prisoner for a
long time … he has never ceased to command my respect as an
individual, and my appreciation as a thoroughly competent Commander.’
`Mustapha Kemal Pasha’ arrived in Erzerum whilst Rawlinson was there,
and if anything he was even more impressed by the man who would
eventually carve the Turkish Republic from the carcass of the Ottoman
Empire, writing, `A man of great strength of character and very
definite and practical views as to the rightful position of his people
in the comity of nations … no seeker after personal fame or
advancement, he is imbued with a deep sense of duty which causes him
to place his country’s interests before all others.’

On the border

For the next four months Rawlinson traveled around the unstable
frontier zone between the incipient Armenian and Turkish
republics. Kars at that time (the spring of 1919) was under Armenian
control — a control sanctioned by the terms of the 1918
armistice. The Armenian commanders interviewed by Rawlinson were
insistent this permission made it an `absolute necessity that they
should disarm the Tartar [Turkish] Moslem population.’ This could only
by done by force and Rawlinson commented, with a feeling of
hopelessness, `This obviously led to fighting; and fighting, as
between Moslem and Armenian, of necessity led to massacres and
atrocities of all kinds.’ Rawlinson also met the local Kurdish tribal
chieftains, one of whom made it clear that `if it was decided (by the
victorious European powers) to endeavor to put them under Armenian
government, and if European troops were to support the Armenians, they
would evacuate the country with all their goods and herds, and go
bodily over to their kinsmen beyond the Turkish frontier.’ Like many
Britons of his period and upper-class, military background, Rawlinson
was enamored with the tribal Kurds; in the same way that Lawrence of
Arabia was with the Bedouin Arabs, calling them `the finest men it has
ever been my privilege to meet.’ He later, however, conceded `they are
brigands by descent as well as by inclination and training.’

Rawlinson was on the Armenian side of the frontier when he heard that
`the conference then proceeding at Erzerum, where has assembled
representatives of the Young Turkish Party … were organizing a
revolution with the eventual object of establishing a Turkish
Republic.’ He made haste to Erzerum and was received cordially by
Karabekir, and later by Kemal himself. He told him the outcome of the
conference — that a national `pact’ had been formed; aimed at ridding
Anatolia of the occupying allied forces and establishing an
independent Turkish state. Rawlinson’s task was hopeless, and went to
Sarýkamýþ, then under Armenian occupation, to rejoin his
men. He describes this remote East Anatolian town, which now boasts
one of Turkey’s best ski resorts, as thus, `This district … much
resembles some parts of Switzerland, the mountains being heavily
wooded and the valleys green and fertile.’ From Sarýkamýþ he
returned to Tbilisi by rail, then took an American destroyer from
Batumi to `Constant’ — and then, after debriefing, back to Britain.

Go back to Turkey, go straight to jail

Rawlinson, though, was not done with Turkey, nor it with him. An
interview with the Foreign Office in London left him with no doubt
that they were skeptical about his reports on the strength and
determination of the Turkish nationalists. Despite this, he was given
a new mission — to return to Anatolia and contact Mustafa Kemal
indirectly and find out what his real aims and objectives were. He
returned to `Constant’ by boat. His return to the east was delayed by
inclement weather and he `enjoyed several days of hunting with the
army hounds, and several rounds of golf on the links which had been
established on the hills to the north-west of Pera.’ Re-crossing the
passes between Trabzon and Erzerum in freezing winter conditions,
Rawlinson and his men reached their goal on Boxing Day and were put up
in a house belonging to the 9th Army — a house where `we were
destined afterwards to remain so long and suffer so severely.’ Victims
of political circumstance and diplomatic wrangling between the Allies
and the new de facto Turkish Republican government, Rawlinson and his
men ended up under house arrest, and then in prison, from March 1920
until October 1921.

In spite of his incarceration, Rawlinson, who had formed such a good
impression of fellow military men Kazým Karabekir and Mustafa
Kemal, wrote near the end of his memoirs: `I am … of the opinion
that the inevitable policy of our country must always be to establish
friendly relations with Turkey. … I had no idea of allowing our
experiences to be made use of by any anti-Turkish party.’ Rawlinson
later was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE)
for his sterling wartime service.

http://todayszaman.com/tz-web/news-193886-117-on-a

Crybabies

Jewish Times of South Jersey.
Stephen Kramer
November 27, 2009
Crybabies

Israelis are often accused of being crybabies about the
Holocaust. It’s `Holocaust this’ and `Holocaust that.’ Enough already,
they say. Of course, every foreign dignitary visiting Israel makes an
obligatory trip to Yad Vashem, Israel’s premier Holocaust resource
center. Israel is also the epicenter for many legal battles against
genocide and has adopted the motto, `Never Again!’ In addition, Israel
jealously guards its title as the primary home of Holocaust
survivors. The Holocaust is at least partially responsible for the
United Nations’ acceptance of Israel into its membership. Inevitably,
Israelis are accused of trading on the Holocaust.

As Prime Minister Netanyahu pointed out in his address to the General
Assembly at the United Nations in September, `Last month, I went to a
villa in a suburb of Berlin called Wannsee. There, on January 20,
1942, after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how
to exterminate the Jewish people. Here is a copy of those minutes, in
which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the
extermination of the Jews. In Berlin, a day before I was in Wannsee, I
was given the original construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau
concentration camp.’ Was Netanyahu trading on the Holocaust or
pointing out the real danger that Israel faces from Iran’s quest for
nuclear weapons?

Is the Holocaust the first and foremost genocidal tragedy of modern
times? The Armenians have made a case that the Turkish massacres
against them during the First World War make that tragedy the
archetype for genocide. But their claim is problematic: 1` the Ottoman
Turks didn’t have a leader like Hitler who built his whole career on
the annihilation of the Jews; 2 ` the Turks didn’t plan and carry out
an Armenian genocide to the same extent as the Nazis, who developed a
blueprint for genocide. The Nazis went so far as to continue
exterminating Jews even when it detracted from their military efforts
towards the end of WWII.

Today, in fact, there’s no consensus on whether there was an Armenian
genocide, and Armenia is even considering giving in on the issue to
cement a diplomatic deal with Turkey. The Armenians, nor any other
people for that matter, have never been subjected to such a
premeditated plan of genocide as the Holocaust. Regardless, genocide
continues to be a huge problem, especially in Africa.

So, with genocide being such an important issue and with the Holocaust
its most compelling example, surely the Israelis aren’t crybabies.

The Palestinians are the biggest crybabies on earth. What are they
crying about? The so-called usurpation of their country,
Palestine. Day in and day out, the Palestinians cry: at the United
Nations, at Arab congresses, on television, anywhere and to
anyone. But the facts are that there never has been a country called
Palestine.

There weren’t any `Palestinians’ in 1922, when the League of Nations
gave the British the Mandate for Palestine, using the ancient name for
the former Ottoman province. (The term became common usage to describe
Jews born in the Mandatory Palestine.) The name `Palestine’ refers to
the Philistines, an ancient sea people from Asia Minor who inhabited
the southern coast of Israel. `Philistine Syria’ (Greek) and
`Provincia Syria Palaestina’ (Roman) were names used to suppress the
Jewish influence there.

The 1947 U.N. Partition Plan divided Palestine into Jewish and Arab
areas. The Arabs rejected the plan and skirmishes against Jews began
immediately. Israel was declared a state by the U.N. after the ensuing
War of Independence. The West Bank and Gazan Arabs failed to declare
their own state or even agitate for one. Instead, Jordan occupied and
then annexed the West Bank and Egypt occupied Gaza. According to the
Arabs, all of Palestine-Israel is disputed territory, `Arab land,’
that they claim for themselves. (Technically, Jordan and Egypt, which
each have a treaty with Israel, accept Israel’s sovereignty within the
1949 armistice lines.)

Something happened after WWII which should have changed the status of
the Palestinians; it was `population transfer.’ The most prominent
example of this phenomenon happened in 1947 during the partition of
British India into India and Pakistan. In the largest and most rapid
population transfer in history, about 18 million Muslims and Hindus
left their homes to relocate with their co-religionists. Had the Arabs
accepted the U.N. Partition Plan for Palestine in 1947, Israel would
have fewer Arab citizens today.The Arabs could have grouped themselves
in the West Bank and Gaza, either as citizens of Jordan and Egypt or
as citizens of their own state.

Emphasizing the pragmatism of population transfer is the exodus of
Jews from Arab countries in North Africa and Arabia, which happened
throughout the decade following Israel’s Declaration of
Independence. Up to 800,000 Jews left their homes, almost all
unwillingly, when the hostility of their Arab neighbors forced them to
flee ` usually with little but what they could carry with them. Since
the number of Jewish refugees is roughly equivalent to the number of
Palestinian refugees in 1948, population transfer of the Palestinians
would have been a pragmatic solution to their problem. (It wasn’t that
any of the transferred populations chose to be exiled … it was a
necessary evil.)

Instead of accepting the U.N. Partition Plan or later peace offers,
the Palestinians have wallowed in their self-induced misery,
complaining bitterly about their conditions. They have made a habit of
turning down every peace overture from Israeli leaders, and later
complaining that the Israelis won’t begin new negotiations starting
with the terms that were summarily refused.

The Palestinians even managed to set up a unique U.N. agency, UNRWA,
to prolong their refugee status until such time as they could usurp
the Jewish state. Instead of building lives for themselves in their
own negotiated state or in neighboring Arab countries, they have
concentrated on trying to destroy Israel. Palestinians are the
crybabies, not Israelis.

Stephen Kramer resided and worked in the Atlantic City area until
1991, when he moved to Israel with his wife, Michal Langweiler, and
two sons. He can be reached at [email protected].

Hayastan All Armenian Fund To Hold Telethon In LA Nov. 26

HAYASTAN ALL ARMENIAN FUND TO HOLD TELETHON IN LA NOV. 26

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.11.2009 22:07 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Hayastan All Armenian Fund will hold its annual
telethon in Los Angeles, California, on November 26. The major part of
donations is supposed to be spent on reconstruction of and development
of Shoushi.

The telethon will be transmitted from 8 am to 8 pm on air of a number
of U.S. radio and TV channels.

U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau’s Personal Library Donated To AGMA

U.S. AMBASSADOR HENRY MORGENTHAU’S PERSONAL LIBRARY DONATED TO AGMA

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.11.2009 21:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The personal library of U.S. Ambassador Henry
Morgenthau, renowned for his extraordinary efforts to bring American
and international attention to the Turkish government’s deportation
and massacres of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, has been donated
to the Armenian Genocide Museum of America (AGMA) in Washington, DC.

"We are extremely grateful to the Morgenthau family for entrusting this
invaluable collection of books to the museum, which provides a window
into the breadth and depth of the Ambassador’s intellectual acumen and
his humanitarian outlook," said Van Z. Krikorian, museum trustee and
chairman of the project’s Building and Operations Committee. "In the
pantheon of heroes who have fought against genocide, the Morgenthau
name is legendary. This collection is priceless and wonderful
Thanksgiving news," added Krikorian.

The gift of Ambassador Morgenthau’s personal library, which has
been privately held by his family since his death in 1946, comes to
AGMA from Henry Morgenthau III, the son of Henry Morgenthau, Jr.,
and the grandson of the Ambassador. In making the gift to AGMA,
Henry Morgenthau III said "I am only putting Ambassador Morgenthau’s
effects where they belong."

Ambassador Morgenthau’s personal library includes books he acquired
during his term of service in the Ottoman Empire, and others obtained
in preparation for his diplomatic posting to expand his knowledge
of the region, its history and people. The collection also includes
Ambassador Morgenthau’s autographed copy of the official State
Department publication "Instructions to the Diplomatic Officers of
the United States," which he was provided upon his appointment.

Armenian Women’s Soccer Team Defeated By Italy

ARMENIAN WOMEN’S SOCCER TEAM DEFEATED BY ITALY

PanARMENIAN.Net
25.11.2009 20:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Armenian women’s soccer team sustained a 0:7 defeat
from Italy in a World Cup 2011 qualifier on November 25.

In a match vs. Finland on November 21 Armenia were also smashed 0:7.

With no points, Armenia are at the bottom of Group 7 (Finland, Italy,
Portugal and Slovenia).

Armenia Attaches Importance To Relations With Japan

ARMENIA ATTACHES IMPORTANCE TO RELATIONS WITH JAPAN

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.11.2009 12:12 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Currently in Japan on a formal visit, Armenian
Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian met with the Speaker of the Japanese
House of Representatives, Mr. Takahiro Yokomichi.

"Armenia attaches importance to development of multilateral relations
with Japan," Minister Nalbandian said. "An Armenian-Japanese friendship
group has been already formed in the Armenian parliament and we are
hopeful that a similar group will be formed in Japan’s parliament
as well."

Mr. Yokomichi, for his part, welcomed Yerevan’s efforts for
normalization of relations with Turkey and voiced hope that
Armenian-Turkish reconciliation will help resolution of the Nagorno
Karabakh conflict, RA MFA press office reported.

RA PM Calls On Functionaries To Make Contribution To Shoushi Reconst

RA PM CALLS ON FUNCTIONARIES TO MAKE CONTRIBUTION TO SHOUSHI RECONSTRUCTION

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.11.2009 12:31 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ RA Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan has called on
Armenian high-ranking officials to make personal contribution to
reconstruction of Shoushi.

"Reconstruction of Shoushi is a matter of honor," he said when
addressing the government on November 26.

The PM also reminded that Hayastan All Armenian Fund organized a
telethon to raise funds for the purpose.

Azerbaijan’s Victory In New War Not Obvious

AZERBAIJAN’S VICTORY IN NEW WAR NOT OBVIOUS

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.11.2009 13:07 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev’s warlike
statements on the threshold of the meeting with his Armenian
counterpart Serzh Sargsyan in Munich considerably damaged Karabakh
talks, according to Andrey Areshev, deputy director general of
Strategic Culture Foundation.

"I always tell Armenians to please us with the agreement that can be
achieved," Aliyev said on the threshold of talks.

"Even international mediators permitted themselves to comment on
the Azeri leader’s eccentric ideas about the compromise," Areshev
emphasized in the article he titled "Karabakh settlement reaches a
deadlock again."

French Co-Chair Bernard Fassier called on both sides "to refrain from
harsh statements at the current stage of talks."

"Azerbaijan’s foreign policy, which is based on maximalistic demands,
is cracking and this makes Baku nervous. Although some may interpret
Aliyev’s statement as a "well turned" diplomatic move, such policy
seems rather doubtful and hampers the negotiation process," Areshev
concluded.

Kyiv’s Goloseyevsky District Council Calls For Armenian Genocide Rec

KYIV’S GOLOSEYEVSKY DISTRICT COUNCIL CALLS FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RECOGNITION

PanARMENIAN.Net
26.11.2009 13:25 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Echoing the address of Arthur Martirosyan, the
head of the Armenian community of Goloseyevsky district of Kyiv, the
district council called on the Ukrainian President and Supreme Rada
to recognize and condemn the Armenian Genocide in the Ottoman Empire.

Mr. Martirosyan thanked his counterparts for support and said that it
is an important decision for the entire Armenian Diaspora of Ukraine,
Analitika.at.ua reported.

Arkady Ghukasyan Declines Interview With Publisher Appo Jabarian Thr

ARKADY GHUKASYAN DECLINES INTERVIEW WITH PUBLISHER APPO JABARIAN THREATENS LAWSUIT AGAINST USA ARMENIAN LIFE
By Appo Jabarian

USA Armenian Life Magazine
November 25, 2009

On November 14, Appo Jabarian wrote an article in USA Armenian Life
Magazine titled, "Former Pres. of Artsakh Arkady Ghukasyan Says
Protocols were unprofessional, and contained many mistakes; He also
Says Armenia’s Foreign Minister is Weak and Unprepared."

Almost immediately after the dissemination of the article, an
avalanche of reactions came from the media in Armenia and around the
world. Literally, dozens of various media outlets echoed the content
of the article, including ArmeniaDiaspora.com, News.am, Aaravot.am,
7or.am, PanArmenian.net, Lragir.am.

AraManoogian.blogspot.com, ArmAr.am, Nouvelles d’Armenie Magazine (in
French), ArmToday.info (in Russian), and Novoye Vremya (in Russian).

The media in Armenia presented various interpretations of the motives
behind Mr. Ghukasyan’s statement that Pres. Serge Sargsyan "must have
acted in the wrong way, but he is a sincere and patriotic person and
shouldered great responsibility," and that Armenia’s Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian "is weak and unprepared."

The most notable reactions came in the form of accusations and
disinformation that were hurled against Appo Jabarian by Ghukasyan’s
office in Yerevan which issued a denial contradicting his statements
he had made earlier.

Ghukasyan’s denial was circulated by certain media outlets and
officials of the Armenian Foreign Ministry in Yerevan along with the
Consulate General of Armenia in Los Angeles.

Armenia’s Consulate General in Los Angeles has never before responded
to Azeri or Turkish disinformation campaigns in the United States. But
the moment this writer authored an expose of the double-talk by
Former Pres. of Artsakh — now turned Armenia’s Ambassador-at-Large
Arkady Ghukasyan — Consulate officials resorted to a disinformation
campaign against him.

On November 17, Armenia’s Consulate e-mailed a communique carrying
false information against Jabarian. The communique was swiftly
rebutted by the Managing Editor of USA Armenian Life Magazine. An
official statement by the editor, countering the Armenian Consulate’s
misleading e-mail was expeditiously sent to various Armenian-American
media outlets. USA Armenian Life’s "Notice of Dissemination of a False
and Libelous Statement" informed the Armenian-American editors and
TV/Internet newscasters to "be advised that the information titled
‘Republic of Armenia’s Ambassador At Large, and the Vice-President of
the Board of Trustees of Armenia Fund Arkady Ghukasyan’s assistant E.

Atanessyan’s interpretation on USA Armenian Life’s news article’
that you have received from the Consulate General of Armenia in
Los Angeles is False and Libelous. Its electronic and/or print
dissemination/broadcast by your news organization may expose your
business entity/entities to legal liabilities."

On November 18, during Mr. Ghukasyan’s stay at the Hilton Hotel in
Glendale, this writer had a telephone conversation with him. In order
to give Amb. Ghukasyan a fair opportunity to present his rebuttal and
views regarding this issue, at the beginning of the conversation, this
writer proposed to have a taped interview either on the telephone or
in person at the hotel. But he declined. And instead he demanded that
this writer disclose the source(s) of comments that were reported in
the article, otherwise, he threatened to take him and USA Armenian
Life to court.

When this blatant threat was hurled at Jabarian, the latter told him
"Mr. Ghukasyan you should remember really well as to whom you have
said the reported comments. I encourage you very much to do so." Then
he immediately backpedaled and started to cajole this commentator by
saying that "we are both patriotic people" and that "we shouldn’t be
talking in the language of lawsuits."

On November 20, USA Armenian Life’s managing editor had a face-to-face
meeting with the source of the facts included in the article; and
re-examined their validity, and they all proved as being solidly
accurate.

Below is a partial list of headlines and comments featured by various
media outlets that followed the lead of USA Armenian Life Magazine’s
Nov. 14 article:

– Nov. 16, News.am’s title: "Nagorno Karabagh Republic’s Former Pres.

of Arkady Ghukasyan Has Labeled Armenia’s Foreign Minister ‘as Weak
and Unprepared.’"

– Nov. 16, 7or.am’s title: "Has Nagorno Karabagh Republic’s Former
President Become Honest?"

– Nov. 16, News.am title: "Arkady Ghukasyan: Edward Nalbandian ‘weak
and unprepared.’"

– Nov. 16, ArmAr.am title: "Arkady Ghukasyan Has Appealed to the
Diaspora to Continue to Be Rightful Demanders [of Justice]."

– Nov. 16, Panarmenian.net title: "Arkady Ghukasyan ascribed comments
he didn’t make."

– Nov. 16, Lragir.am carried Appo Jabarian’s article in its entirety
with the following title: "Ghukasyan’s Sensation in the U.S."

– Nov. 17, Aravot.am title: "Is the Ambassador Disagreeable with
the President?"

– Nov. 18, Lragir.am title: "SIMPLY A BLACKMAIL? or Guys! Money is
needed urgently!" The author, Bagrat Kheroyan, wrote: "The Ex-president
of Artsakh, Arkady Ghukasyan, has made a couple of announcements in the
USA, which raise some questions: In case he is ‘as honest and patriotic
as Serzh Sargsyan and values Shushi so much, why doesn’t he live in
Shushi? Wouldn’t Shushi develop fast had Arkady Ghukasyan and others
like him built their palaces and launched their businesses in Shushi?"

Kheroyan further wrote: "I would suggest the Diaspora to organize
fund-raising for changing the Constitution of the Republic of Artsakh
and writing there that the presidents and state officials of the
Republic of Artsakh will simply be considered betrayers in case after
they serve, they live and establish their businesses out of Artsakh,
especially in Armenia."

– On Nov. 19, Lragir.am followed up with a second commentary titled:
"SIMPLY A BLACKMAIL? No. 2; Or It Seems Like a New Stratagem is
Being Formed."

Lragir.am observed: "It seems like the promise of a future job is
the obvious reason that Arkady Ghukasyan has mercilessly criticized
and labeled ignorant … Republic of Armenia’s Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian. It seems like it is not difficult to understand
that the Republic of Armenia’s Foreign Ministry post is promised to
Arkady Ghukasyan."

Whatever were his motives, Mr. Ghukasyan should not have backed
out of the remarks he had made earlier, during his appearances in
North America.