NKR Not Ready For Territorial Concessions

NKR NOT READY FOR TERRITORIAL CONCESSIONS

news.am
Nov 3 2009
Armenia

Karabakh’s territory is the territory stipulated by NKR’s Constitution
and we are not ready to make any concessions in this regard. By ‘the
territory’ we mean the present actual territory of Artsakh. This is
our standpoint and we will stick to it," Ara Harutunyan, NKR Prime
Minister and Leader of "Azat Hayrenik" (Free Motherland) party,
told journalists.

Concerning the Madrid principles on settlement of the Karabakh
conflict, he said Artsakh has not received the document officially,
and "we know about them [the principles] only from press and news –
which cannot be considered as document."

"Both NKR and Armenia’s Presidents have stated that any document
would be signed by both authorities only when the nation approves
it. We have no right to doubt this – as the people has the final say"
the Premier stated.

As concerns the Armenia-Turkey normalization process, Harutunyan
admitted that Karabakh has some expectations in this regard, and
particularly economic ones – as Armenia’s economic development implies
NKR’s one as well.

"We all know that it will enable the country to develop. However,
this should happen without preconditions. Opening of the border does
not mean that the preconditions and claims are accepted," maintains
Harutunyan. He underlined that "Azat Hayrenik" absolutely trusts
RA President’s line. "His 20-years-old experience makes us believe
that every step that President of Armenia makes is well-balanced and
reasoned," he stated.

U.Lars-Kazbegi Checkpoint’s Opening Remains Questionable

U.LARS-KAZBEGI CHECKPOINT’S OPENING REMAINS QUESTIONABLE

Aysor
Nov 3 2009
Armenia

There hadn’t been any negotiations between Georgian and Russian
officials in Yerevan, said Georgia’s Deputy Foreign Minister Nino
Kalandadze at brief-conference in Tbilisi. However some media
outlets reported yesterday that Georgian and Russian officials held
secret talks in Yerevan on opening of U.Lars-Kazbegi checkpoint at
Georgia-Russia border.

"Our diplomats had no any negotiations with Russian counterparts in
Yerevan," said Nino Kalandadze adding that the issue was addressed
during the meeting with Armenian officials. According to Georgian
Deputy Foreign Minister U.Lars-Kazbegi checkpoint’s opening is "a
very important issue for Armenian side that is why there were some
consolations in Yerevan."

U.Lars-Kazbegi checkpoint was closed by decision of Russia’s parties in
July 2006 due to necessary repairs and its equipment in accordance with
modern standards. Meanwhile absence of diplomatic relations between
Russia and Georgia inhibited U.Lars-Kazbegi checkpoint’s repairing
and opening. Georgia’s President Mikhail Saakashvili said during his
visit to Armenia that Georgia was ready to open cargo transit service
if Moscow gave its agreement.

A Flag Flap

A FLAG FLAP
By Arthur I. Cyr

Korea Times
2009/11/137_54781.html
Nov 3 2009
S. Korea

What’s in a name? Plenty, and the same goes for a nation’s flag.

The national flag remains a potent emotional symbol, demonstrated this
month by intense â~@~U and underreported â~@~U conflict among Turkey,
Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The flag flap has important bearing on international relations,
especially U.S. foreign policy.

Azerbaijan flags were removed from a stadium in Bursa, Turkey, where
a World Cup match between Armenia and Turkey was being held. They
were found in a trashcan.

In retaliation, Azerbaijani officials in Baku removed Turkey’s
flag from a war memorial commemorating Turkish troops who fell in
fighting for Azerbaijan independence in 1918. On Oct. 27, the flags
were raised again.

Turkey is making strong efforts, so far reciprocated, to resolve
fundamental conflict with Armenia, dating back to the Armenian genocide
early in the 20th century.

On Oct. 10, the two nations signed a protocol to open their shared
border. Turkey closed the border in 1993 as a gesture of solidarity
with Azerbaijan. In mid-October, President Serkh Sarkisian became
the first head of state of Armenia to travel to Turkey.

Armenia-Turkey rapprochement in turn has antagonized Azerbaijan,
which has been losing to Armenia in a border dispute involving the
territory of Nagorno-Karabakh. This has occurred despite repeated
assurances from national officials in Ankara that relations with Baku
would remain strong.

This interplay may be difficult to follow, involving complex politics
as well as obscure geography, but Turkey’s vital strategic importance
provides a powerful incentive to understand developments.

Despite current tensions between a religious government and a secular
constitution and state, Turkey remains a strong, stable representative
democracy.

Eventually, the nation may serve as a bridge between East and West,
which brings essential economic and political modernization to the
Arab world.

Turkey’s relative isolation within Europe is a problem. The European
Union has turned the nation’s application for membership into seemingly
endless agony.

No doubt concern about Islamic extremism contributes to caution,
but more general long-standing European prejudice against outside
populations undeniably is involved. Condescension is combined with
inertia.

Developments within Turkey overall have been reassuring. The people
remain committed to representative government, an effective counter
against al-Qaida and other extremist movements. To date, terrorist
acts in Turkey have boomeranged.

The government in Ankara has placed priority on good relations with
Israel as well as with Arab states. Turkey commands vital sea lanes
and trade routes, including the Straits of Bosporus and potential
oil and gas lines from the Caucasus.

Ankara-Washington cooperation is strongly rooted. Turkey has been
actively engaged in Afghanistan, including major military command
responsibilities. During the first Persian Gulf War, U.S. B-52 bombers
were deployed on Turkish soil, a potentially risky move by Ankara.

Turkey played a vital Allied role during the 1950-53 Korean War; the
U.N. military cemetery at Busan, the largest port city in South Korea,
contains a notably large number of Turkish graves.

This background is of even greater importance given that ties between
Turkey and the United States are currently badly strained. The Bush
administration invasion of Iraq was bitterly opposed by Ankara.

Attacks by anti-Ankara Kurdish terrorists based in Iraq have led to
Turkish military strikes into the northern region of that country.

The Obama administration is giving some priority to rebuilding frayed
relations with Turkey, along with Israel our most important ally in
the region. This may reinforce positive steps in southeast Europe.

Arthur I. Cyr is Clausen distinguished professor at Carthage College.

E-mail him at [email protected]. For more stories, visit Scripps
Howard News Service ().

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/
www.scrippsnews.com

BAKU: Minsk Group Has Been Formal Since Its Inception: Political Exp

MINSK GROUP HAS BEEN FORMAL SINCE ITS INCEPTION: POLITICAL EXPERT

Today.Az
/57142.html
Nov 3 2009
Azerbaijan

Day.Az interview with Azerbaijani political expert Fikrat Sadigov.

Day.Az: Is intensification of the Armenian-Azerbaijani meetings on
resolution of the Karabakh conflict linked with intensified efforts
of the OSCE Minsk Group or there is a real document for discussions
on the table?

Fikrat Sadigov: The OSCE Minsk Group has become a group of observers
rather than mediators. They only arrange a meeting venue and agenda
is prepared by the Heads of State.

The MG activities have a certain formality. It seeks a legal balance
with two sides whose views on settlement of the Karabakh conflict are
not equal under international law. Baku’s position is much stronger
than that of Yerevan. If to take principles of international law
as basis, and it is high time to dot "i’s" and cross "t’s" and call
Armenia an aggressor.

The MG has been formal since its inception, so I think that it was
created in order to prevent Azerbaijan from recovering its lands by
military means. Meantime, Azerbaijan’s maximum compromise is that
it agrees on the initial return of the seven regions by Armenia,
and then to discuss the status of Karabakh.

In fact, at the very beginning the OSCE Minsk Group supported
Azerbaijan, and then began to overly balance the two conflicting
countries.

Q: May format of the OSCE MG be changed?

A: I think it is possible. It is high time to replace France with
England or Germany. Turkey also offers mediation services. I propose to
extend the OSCE Minsk by two or three countries. To do this Minsk Group
needs to convene a second conference of representatives of all OSCE
Minsk Group countries, where changes to the MG format can be proposed.

I think that Azerbaijan should initiate this conference and should
not be ashamed of anything in this respect.

Q: Is an agreement on return of Azerbaijan’s five or seven regions
likely to be signed soon?

A: I remember the statement by co-chairs Matthew Bryza and Yuri
Merzlyakov who stated that Azerbaijan’s five regions will be returned
in the first stage of the settlement of the Karabakh conflict by the
end of this year. Another two regions of Azerbaijan (Kalbajar and
Lachin) were to be demilitarized in the second stage and international
peacekeeping force was to be deployed there.

Q: To what extent Azerbaijan’s stance on Karabakh issue has changed
following signing of the Armenia-Turkey protocols in Zurich?

A: The signing of the protocols in Zurich distracted world attention
from the Karabakh conflict and liberation of the five occupied regions
by Armenia. This strengthened Armenia’s stance. Therefore negative
reaction of the Azerbaijani public and leadership on these protocols
is understandable.

http://www.today.az/news/politics

Turkish Professor: Azerbaijan Abuses Karabakh Settlement

TURKISH PROFESSOR: AZERBAIJAN ABUSES KARABAKH SETTLEMENT
by Armen Hareyan

HULIQ
Nov 3 2009
SC

Here is what is happening between Turkey and Azerbaijan in regard
to Nagorno Karabakh. Azerbaijan in late 1990s started war against
the civilian population of the Nagorno Karabakh Armenians, who voted
to be independent from Azerbaijan due to cultural and human rights
related oppression. Armenia supported the move and Turkey blockaded
Turkish-Armenian border showing solidarity with Azerbaijan. The later
holds Turkey hostage to relations with Armenia. Turkey says you can’t
do that.

Today the most prominent newspaper in Turkey, Hurriyet in its lead
story quotes a university professor who speaks of Azerbaijan’s abuse
of Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement. "Turkey cannot unilaterally
resolve the Karabakh dispute. This is being abused by Azerbaijan,"
said Huseyin Bagcı, an international relations professor at the
Middle East Technical University, based in Ankara.

On October 10 in Zurich Armenia and Turkey signed protocols aimed at
normalizing the relations. While the process seems to be in a deadlock
in the Turkish parliament the protocols have met with criticism in
Turkey, parts of Armenian diaspora and Azerbaijan.

In Turkey the criticism comes from the opposition. It is concerned
that Turkey should not open its borders with Armenia and establish
diplomatic relations before there is any progress on the issue
of Nagorno Karabakh between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Armenia, US,
Russia and European mediators say these to processes are separate
and not linked.

Significant circles of the Armenian diaspora criticized the protocols
voicing concerns that the international inter-governmental historical
commission, establoished to deal with the consequences of the Armenian
genocide carried on by the government of Turkey between 1915 and 1921
may question that fact. However, while Turkey calls it "historical"
commission despite the absence of the word "historical" in the
protocol, and hopes that it may question the fact of the Armenian
genocide, Armenia rejects the approach and says stresses that it’s an
inter-governmental commission aimed at dealing with the consequences
of the genocide, but not questioning it. In fact, in a response to
the concerns of the powerful US Armenian diaspora Senate Majority
Leader senator Harry Reid from Nevada called on U.S. Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton to meet with Armenian-American leaders, sharing
his concerns with the Armenian American community.

In Azerbaijan the criticism toward the Armenian-Turkish rapprochement
comes from the fact that Azerbaijan feels that it is losing
an important factor in solving the issue of the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict. In the past twenty years of the conflict – ceasefire achieved
and maintained without peacekeepers since 1994 – Azerbaijan has used
Turkey and the Turkish blockade of Armenia as a factor in pressuring
Armenia for concession.

Now more voices from Turkey emerge saying Azerbaijan can’t expect
Turkey to unilaterally solve the Nagorno Karabakh problem. In fact
Azerbaijan has not rendered the same support to Turkey in regard to
Cyprus issue. Azerbaijan has also removed the Turkish flags from many
prominent locations and has threatened to supply its natural gas to
Turkey charging higher prices.

The international community hopes that the both parliaments of Turkey
and Armenia will ratify the protocols and put it into force. If Turkey
helps Azerbaijan to have more realistic expectations it may actually
help to speedy resolution of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Madrid
principles, put forward by the Minsk group call for a referendum to
determine the final status of the Nagorno Karabakh’s Republic. In
the meanwhile, more people in Turkey think that Azerbaijan should be
more constructive and not expect Turkey to solve the Nagorno Karabakh
conflict "unilaterally."
From: Baghdasarian

Turkish-Azerbaijani "Cold War:" Moscow Benefits From Washington’s In

TURKISH-AZERBAIJANI "COLD WAR:" MOSCOW BENEFITS FROM WASHINGTON’S INDECISIVENESS
Fariz Ismailzade

Jamestown Foundation
Nov 2 2009

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (R) and his Armenian
counterpart Eduard Nalbandiana complete the signing of the protocol.

Recent weeks have seen unprecedented and potentially far reaching
damage to the Turkish-Azerbaijani strategic partnership. Ever since
Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) announced its
intension to normalize relations with Azerbaijan’s arch-rival Armenia,
the relationship between Ankara and Baku has cooled. The Azerbaijani
leadership sent a strong message to Ankara in April, when President
Ilham Aliyev refused to accept Turkish President Abdulah Gul’s
invitation to attend the U.N. conference "Alliance of civilizations,"
held in Istanbul.

Yet, it was after the signing of the protocols on the establishment of
diplomatic relations between Turkey and Armenia that Baku’s outrage
spiraled. Both the Azerbaijani public and its political leadership
openly condemned this one-sided Turkish policy. Indeed, the Azeri
foreign ministry immediately issued a press release in which it said
that the signing of the protocols "directly contradicts the national
interests of Azerbaijan and overshadows the spirit of brotherly
relations between Azerbaijan and Turkey built on deep historical roots"
(, October 12).

That apparent cooling of the bilateral relationship, moved toward a
cold war when Azerbaijani flags were banned during the Turkish-Armenian
soccer match in Bursa on October 14 and Azerbaijani media outlets
broadcast images of the Azerbaijani flag being torn apart and thrown
into trash bins by Turkish police officers. In addition, the Azeri
public was outraged by reports that the Armenian President Serzh
Sargsyan, whom Azerbaijanis view as one of the main organizers of the
Khojali massacre in 1992, was warmly embraced by President Gul and
his wife during the soccer match. Gul’s wife, reportedly, even cooked
for Sargsyan and Gul offered his bedroom to his Armenian counterpart.

Such news has caused deep anti-Turkish sentiments to flourish in Baku.

Traditionally an ally, brother and last resort of hope, Turkey is
no longer trusted in the Azerbaijani capital. In an effort to gain
an additional friendly neighbor, Ankara seems to have overstretched
and nearly ruined its strategic relations with Azerbaijan.

The reaction in Baku was swift. Turkish flags, hanging in the
memorial for martyred Turkish soldiers, were lowered. Youth groups
and opposition parties lashed out at the Turkish leadership for the
humiliation and disrespect shown to the Azerbaijani flag in Bursa. And
parliament held heated debates about the "flag incident," during
which Vice-Speaker Ziyafat Asgarov said, "I take the disrespect shown
against the Azerbaijani flag as a personal insult" (AZTV, October 16).

Moreover, on October 16 Aliyev announced during his cabinet meeting
that Azerbaijan would consider alternative options to export its gas,
since Turkish-Azerbaijani talks on gas transit have not produced
concrete results (, October 16). He accused Turkey of
stalling these negotiations by offering unacceptably low prices
for Azerbaijani gas and did not hesitate to mention that until now,
Azerbaijan has been selling natural gas to Turkey at 30 percent of
its value on international markets. Aliyev also mentioned Russia,
Iran and the Black sea as alternatives routes for Azeri gas and
coincidently, in the same week, Gazprom and Azerbaijan’s State Oil
Company SOCAR signed an agreement in Baku for the export of 500 million
cubic meters of Azeri gas to Russia at the price Aliyev described as
"mutually beneficial" (Trend News Agency, October 16).

It is clear that the recent developments in the South Caucasus
and the Turkish-Armenian rapprochement have seriously damaged the
Turkish-Azerbaijani strategic partnership. This partnership has
been the backbone of East-West energy and its future transportation
corridors, security, political and geostrategic balance in the region
as well as the overall Turkish (or Western) entrance into the Caspian
region. Without this strategic partnership, the Turkish, E.U. and U.S.

axis of influence in the South Caucasus and further into the Central
Asian region is at risk. This geopolitical miscalculation on the part
of Turkish, E.U. and U.S. officials, all of whom have actively pushed
for a one-sided normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations without
the consideration of Azerbaijan’s interests and the resolution of
the Karabakh conflict will see a boomerang effect.

Russia may utilize this excellent opportunity to further advance its
political agenda in the region: the isolation of Georgia by cutting
it off from new transit routes; shelving the E.U. and U.S.-backed
Nabucco gas pipeline project by destroying the Azerbaijani-Turkish
strategic partnership and thus forcing Azerbaijan to sell its gas to
Russia; drawing Turkey into its own orbit of influence undermining the
E.U.-U.S.-Turkey axis of influence in the region. Before Washington
realizes, it will be too late to protect the South Caucasus as
a sovereign and independent region. For the first time since the
collapse of the Soviet Union, the U.S. appears to underestimate what
is unfolding in the region. A lack of clear vision on the part of the
U.S. administration clearly plays into Russian hands. It is perhaps no
coincidence that the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov so actively
pushed his Armenian counterpart to sign the protocol with Turkey.

www.mfa.gov.az
www.day.az

ANKARA: ‘October Road’ Taken By Gov’t Isn’t Perfect

‘OCTOBER ROAD’ TAKEN BY GOV’T ISN’T PERFECT
Fulya Ozerkan

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 2 2009

Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu. Hurriyet photo

The government-sponsored peace initiative in October encompassing a
wide region from the Caucasus to the Middle East is positive following
months of effort but cannot be portrayed as excellent considering
the results, according to foreign policy analysts.

"October can be considered positive in terms of foreign policy but
it would not be correct to portray it as perfect. There are questions
and exclamation marks," Faruk Logoglu, Turkey’s former ambassador to
Washington, told the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review.

Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu earlier declared October to be the
"month of peace" as Ankara’s far-reaching diplomatic efforts included
the normalization of relations with Armenia and transitions from
cooperation to integration with Iraq, Syria and Iran.

"We can say October was a month of peace as we did not see any
conflicts," said Huseyin Bagcı, an international relations professor
at the Middle East Technical University. "It is not easy to get swift
results when the process is ongoing on all fronts," he said.

The Caucasus

Despite the signing of the documents between Turkey and Armenia in
Zurich on Oct. 10, the process remains deadlocked, Logoglu said.

"Their signing was good but it is not possible to talk about the
concept of peace before the whole process is concluded. The problem
is still there for the time being," he said.

The agreements inked with Yerevan must pass the Turkish and Armenian
parliaments before they can come into force. The development in
Turkish-Armenian ties drew criticism from Azerbaijan, which opposed
the signing because there has not yet been a settlement to the
Karabakh problem.

"Turkey cannot unilaterally resolve the Karabakh dispute. This is
being abused by Azerbaijan," said Bagcı.

The Middle East

The government has advanced relations with Syria, Iraq and Iran in
the region while the ties with Israel moved in the opposite direction,
said Logoglu.

Accompanied by many ministers, Davutoglu traveled to Syria on Oct. 13
and chaired the first ministerial meeting of the high-level strategic
cooperation council with his Syrian counterpart, a mechanism similar
to the one established with Iraq. Over the weekend, the minister
was in northern Iraq where he met with Iraqi Kurdish leader Massoud
Barzani and inaugurated Turkey’s consul in Mosul.

"I welcome Turkey’s relations with Iraq but we don’t know how the
central government in Baghdad looks to growing ties between Turkey
and the Kurdish administration in the north. I don’t think [Baghdad]
applauds it," said Logoglu. "The current picture in Iraq is not good.

This is a question mark."

Turkey has been the protector of the Iraqi Kurds, according to Bagcı,
who welcomed the government’s northern Iraq policy. "Turkey is a
project manager in the region, not a project designer. The project
designer is the United States and Europe," he said.

EU vs Middle East

Tension in Turkish-Israeli relations already strained by the Gaza
War spread to the military domain when the government excluded Tel
Aviv last month from a military exercise for political reasons.

"Turkey is criticizing Israel in a constructive way [and is
suggesting] that the latter should change its policy but Turkey is
not anti-Israel," said Bagcı.

Ankara’s alliance with Iraq, Iran and Syria have once again sparked
fears over the direction of foreign policy and is leading to
speculation in Western media that Turkey is drifting away from the
Europe Union.

"Turkey’s level of integration with Iraq, Syria and Iran is, on paper,
superior to that with the EU, which shows not where Turkey is looking
to but where the country is," said Logoglu. "I think Turkey’s cooling
ties with Europe and turning its face to Arab and Islamic countries
is not a foreign policy preference but a result of Turkey’s domestic
policy dynamics," he said.

Bagcı, however, said Turkey was anchored to the West but had
broadened its vision in comparison to past years. "Turkey is like a
sheep with its rope tied to a post. The rope was two meters in the
past, but today, the sheep is grazing on a wider pasture – although
the post is still there, that is, the West," he said.

ANKARA: Historic Archives Of Studio Osep Revealed

HISTORIC ARCHIVES OF STUDIO OSEP REVEALEDFONT SIZE: LARGER|SMALLER

Hurriyet Daily News
oric-archives-of-studio-osep-revealed-2009-11-02
N ov 2 2009
Turkey

Sociologist Tayfun SerttaÅ~_ has revealed the near-forgotten story of
Studio Osep, the leading photography studio in Turkey for decades,
with a new book that synthesizes 10 years of research and presents
some 6,500 archival photos

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story omitted the origin of
Minasoglu’s family.

If the story of Osep Minasoglu – born Hovsep Minasyon to a family of
Armenian origin – had not accidentally crossed the path of sociologist
Tayfun SerttaÅ~_, then Minasoglu’s 70-year adventure as a Turkish
studio-photography pioneer could have been lost to history.

Minasoglu started taking photos with an Agfa camera that his brother
gave him when he was still a child. During the 1950s, he learned
photographic techniques from experts at the U.S.-based Kodak Company
in his spare time.

His family was wealthy. Minasoglu received his education at Saint
Benoît French School in Beyoglu, which was attended largely by
students of privilege. But a surprise awaited the Minasoglu family
during World War II: the Wealth Tax, which was issued in 1942 during
the administration of Prime Minister Å~^ukru Saracoglu. This tax
on the country’s rich was applied in part to discriminate against
the financial independence of Turkey’s non-Muslims. Many successful
non-Muslims lost their wealth, while those who failed to pay the tax
were sent to work camps in AÅ~_kale in the eastern Anatolian province
of Erzurum.

Non-Muslim financial independence was similarly affected by the events
of Sept. 6-7, 1955, which left a stain on Turkey’s recent history.

Tension between Turkey and Greece had been increasing because of
the Cyprus problem while public opinion was very sensitive toward
further provocation, meaning that even the slightest spark could
cause a societal explosion. This inferno duly happened.

On Sept. 6, the Istanbul Express reported that Ataturk’s house had
been bombed in Thessaloniki. People rushed into the streets, attacking
Greeks, Armenians and Jews over the course of two days. The Minasoglu
family was also attacked, shortly after losing its wealth in the wake
of the Wealth Tax. Minasoglu had to leave school.

Following the events, Kodak closed down its branch office in Turkey.

With reference letters from the company in hand, Minasoglu left Turkey
for Beirut and traveled on to Paris.

Minasoglu finds a champion

Now, in honor of the photographer, sociologist Tayfun SerttaÅ~_ has
published "Studio Osep," a Turkish- and English-language work from
Aras Publishing that features the results of his 10 years of research
on Minasoglu. Furthermore, an exhibition displaying photos compiled
from Minasoglu’s archives has opened at Gallery Non in Istanbul’s
Tophane district. The exhibition runs through Nov. 14.

All photos in the book and exhibition were compiled from 6,500
images found in Minasoglu’s single-room house in TarlabaÅ~_ı. The
sociologist, speaking to the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review,
recounted the photographer’s 70-year story.

"I have been researching the life of Minasoglu for 10 years. I spent
most of my days with him, but I only realized that I was with such
a legend five years ago," said SerttaÅ~_. "Osep’s photos document
Turkey’s recent history."

New faces of Turkish cinema

Minasoglu’s Paris adventure ended because of the 1956 war between
France and Algeria; because of pressures against immigrants, he was
forced to return to Istanbul. He opened a studio in Sirkeci and took
tourist photos using a Polaroid camera.

Minasoglu said the Polaroid camera was not used in Turkey during
those years, meaning that Minasoglu was able to take advantage of
the technology and earn good money within a short time.

Later on, Studio Osep moved to a new location covering 350 square
meters on Topagacı Street in Taksim. Minasoglu began to take photos
of future actors and actresses. Turkey’s Hollywood, YeÅ~_ilcam, gained
new faces thanks to him. Fittingly for a photographer involved with
actors and actresses, the studio is also remembered today as the
first in Turkey to retouch photos.

SerttaÅ~_, who offers a sociological perspective on Studio Osep’s
years capturing YeÅ~_ilcam, said: "Only some of the prospective future
actresses who came to the studio for a photo shoot actually became
famous. Osep’s skillful photos had a great share in this. However,
those who could not gain fame were often sent to brothels on Cihangir’s
Abanoz Street. Actually, Minasoglu unwittingly photographed the
sociology of Beyoglu for 40 years."

Minasoglu not only photographed actors and actresses but also
politicians and ambassadors. He is also the first photographer to shoot
for pornographic magazines in Turkey. "I was not interested in women’s
bodies while taking their photos, because I was a professional,"
he said. "Turkey was freer in those years. There was no alienation
from women’s bodies in the country [as there is today]."

BOX

Archives perished in a fire

Minasoglu said he had never shared the secrets of his 70-year career
with anyone, adding, "I used methods of lighting and retouching
method while shooting YeÅ~_ilcam’s future actresses. I preferred
special light for hair. I took photos in a special, large room and,
in this way, I could take candid shots of the models."

Minasoglu kept a copy of all his photos. There were thousands of
photos in his studio at the time of his bankruptcy in 1990. When his
studio was repossessed, Minasoglu entrusted his archives to one of his
friends. However, as the result of a fire, all his archival documents,
historically significant correspondence and technical formulas were
reduced to ash.

http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/n.php?n=hist

What’s Peter Semneby’s Aim?

WHAT’S PETER SEMNEBY’S AIM?

news.am
Nov 3 2009
Armenia

On the threshold of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ visit to the
region scheduled for early November, EU Special Representative for the
South Caucasus Peter Semneby made a number of provocative statements,
which may only exacerbate the Armenian-Azerbaijani disagreements.

Long ago Armenia outlined the greatest extent of concessions it is
ready for, and the only thing for the international community to do
was to focus its attention on Azerbaijan’s non-constructive position.

All of a sudden, a high-ranking European official made statements
that can only cause official Yerevan to revert to the initial hard
lines at the next stage of the negotiations process.

It is noteworthy that in his sensational interview with the Russian
Vremya Novostey (Time of News) newspaper, Mr. Semneby, roughly
speaking, "beat" even Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. A couple of
months ago the latter used such a vague phrase as "Nagorno-Karabakh
will have some status," whereas the high-ranking European official
stated that the most complicated issues, that is the issues related
to Nagorno-Karabakh’s status, are being postponed for an indefinite
period. Thus, Mr. Semneby thinks that the return of the regions forming
a security zone round Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan is a very easy
issue, whereas that of Nagorno-Karabakh status is a complicated one.

This position is beneath criticism and runs counter to the
previous statements made by all the international mediators, who
have repeatedly stated the inevitability of mutual, and painful,
concessions. Mr. Semneby, however, has presented a picture that does
not contain a single hint at any concessions by Azerbaijan.

It is common knowledge that official Yerevan encounters serious
problems with presenting its approaches to the Nagorno-Karabakh
population. Although it is Armenia’s ex-president Robert Kocharyan who
is fully responsible for the Nagorno-Karabakh being ousted from the
negotiation process, repeatedly reminding the Armenian side of this
fact does not resolve one of the major problems. Although Armenia and
Azerbaijan are the only negotiators, none of their decisions may be
implemented if official Yerevan fails to convince Stepanakert of the
necessity for observing the agreements.

The European official should have understood the simple truth. Mr.

Semneby’s sensational interview, however, evoked most unfavorable
responses by the Armenian and Nagorno-Karabakh authorities. The most
important fact is that the EU Representative contradicts himself by,
on the one hand, calling for not burdening the Armenians authorities
to get them to hold a constructive position and, on the other hand,
creating difficulties for them. What is the cause of all that? A
complete lack of understanding of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and
of the limit of the conflicting parties’ potential for concessions,
or the European Union’s sudden wish to torpedo the negotiations? Or,
may be it is just an amateurish approach?

President Serzh Sargsyan Arrived In Kuwait

PRESIDENT SERZH SARGSYAN ARRIVED IN KUWAIT

Aysor
Nov 3 2009
Armenia

President Serzh Sargsyan today at the evening visited Kuwait for
a two-day state visit. At the International Airport of El-Kuwait,
the Armenian President was officially welcomed, mentioned the Press
Office of the Armenian President.

The delegation headed by President Sargsyan comprises Foreign Minister
Edward Nalbandian, Finance Minister Tigran Davtyan, Diaspora Minister
Hranush Hakobyan, Minister of Culture Hasmik Poghosyan, Minister of
Education and Science Armen Ashotyan, Chairman of the Armenia-Kuwait
Deputy Friendship Group Vahan Hovhannisyan, President of the Union
of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs Arsen Ghazaryan, President of
the Chamber of Commerce and Industry Martin Sargsyan.

President Sargsyan is scheduled to have a number of official meetings
within the framework of the visit. Besides, Serzh Sargsyan will meet
representatives of the Armenian community of Kuwait.