Average Monthly Pension Amount Goes To 10104 Dram

AVERAGE MONTHLY PENSION AMOUNT GOES TO 10104 DRAM

Aysor
Nov 5 2009
Armenia

Armenian state budget for 2010 will direct 241.27 billion dram towards
social spending, Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Gevorg Petrosyan
told journalists. Of this, 6.5144 million dram will go to pension
while it invariably stands by 8 thousand dram.

"Average monthly pension amount goes to 10 104 dram while 148.0156
million dram will go to social spending," said minister.

One year of length of service brings 450 dram, average monthly labor
pension stands by 26 thousand dram, awarded payments invariably go
to 20 thousand dram; spending on family supports is expected to go
to 31.023 million dram. Children’s pensions are paid for children
under the age of 2 (18 thousand dram); families with newborn first
child will receive 50 thousand dram, families with newborn second
and more child will receive 430 thousand dram.

Armenian state budget will direct 4.536 million dram towards spending
on unemployment benefits, of this, monthly benefit stand by 18
thousand.

National health care spending is expected to stand by 167.3 million
dram. Average daily cost for per patient goes to 11 500 dram.

Spending on disabled people (wheelchairs and hearing aid) goes to 119.2
million dram. It is expected to buy Russian-made 450 wheelchairs and
1100 hearing aids and 218 European-made hearing aids.

Minister:Today We Don’t Have Enough Means To Keep All That People

MINISTER:TODAY WE DON’T HAVE ENOUGH MEANS TO KEEP ALL THAT PEOPLE

Aysor
Nov 5 2009
Armenia

Answering the question of Aysor.am whether it is possible in 2010 to
have growth in the sum of money assigned for the homeless people,
Gevorg Petrosyan, the Labor and Social Affairs Minister of the
Republic of Armenia, said that the financial economic crisis is not
rolled around the neck of the social sphere, but he doesn’t want to
show a surplus optimism, give promises and not to keep them later.

The responsibility for the homeless people is lying on the Labor
and Social Affairs Ministry of the Armenian Republic. Adjacent to it
there is the nursing home N1 in Yerevan founded in 2007. The boarding
house is indicated for 60 people and only for 60 days. After 60 days
the homeless are being returned to the street and a new group is
being gathered.

G. Petrosyan said that it’s a pity that they return the people back
to the street, but mentioned that there is a problem of an objective
impossibility: "We have the desire not to let those people out,
we always be careful for not letting anyone out to the street, but
today unfortunately the number of the people who live on the streets
is not reduced, on the contrary there is a growth even noticed. On
the other hand we are not able to keep all that people."

He also added that the Ministry is not getting along only with the
money provided by the state budget. They try to find more money
through by the support of foreign sponsors.

"It is out of our ability to solve that problem", – the Minister said.

To the question whether there is another country where in 60 days
the person is being out to the street again Mr. Petrosyan said that
he has not studied the experience of the other countries.

"Your accuse would be reasonable if we had resources but told them
to leave saying that we didn’t have means to care about them.", –
said G. Petrosyan.

ANKARA: Kemalist Bolshevik Turkey: Great March To Civilization!

KEMALIST BOLSHEVIK TURKEY: GREAT MARCH TO CIVILIZATION!

Today’s Zaman
Nov 6 2009
Turkey

Images from "La Turquie Kemaliste," published by the Kemalist regime
between 1934 and 1941.

A few weeks ago, my close friend Mustafa Akyol gave me a call to share
his "aha moment" after listening to Mr. Eric Zurcher’s lecture on
"Kemalist modernization."

Mustafa also sent me some photos, the copies of which he got during
this conference. He told me this was the first time in his life that
he had seen them. Actually, it was the first time for me as well.

These photos speak for themselves. I don’t know if there would be
enough space to put them in today’s edition of Today’s Zaman, but their
content is described quite well in Mustafa’s article quoted below.

Talking to Mustafa and seeing those pictures brought me once again
to the marvelous novel by Milan Kundera, "The Unbearable Lightness
of Being." Kundera, like he did in many of his other novels,
makes quite illuminating references to the totalitarian nature of
socialism in this novel. When I read his descriptions I cannot help
but draw some parallels between Turkey and what he is talking about:
"Anyone who thinks that the Communist regimes of Central Europe
are exclusively the work of criminals is overlooking a basic truth:
the criminal regimes were made not by criminals but by enthusiasts
convinced they had discovered the only road to paradise." So if your
mission is to do good for society, you are entitled to use any means
for this "endeavor." During the "hat revolution" (1925), which aimed
at modernizing Turkish people by making men wear Western-style hats,
dozens of people were hanged because of their resistance of this
"revolution." A "small" sacrifice to create "heaven" on earth!

Let us read another paragraph from Kundera: "In the realm of
totalitarian kitsch, all answers are given in advance and preclude any
questions. It follows, then, that the true opponent of totalitarian
kitsch is the person who ask questions. A question is like a knife
that slices through the stage backdrop and gives us a look at what
lies hidden behind it." The Turkish education system is based on
complete brainwashing and standardization, which aims at raising a
"secular," "nationalist" individual who looks at everything from the
perspective that the state wants to give her. Kemalist Turks never ask
the following questions: Why don’t we read anything about Armenians in
our history? Why was everything Ataturk did good, while any people who
opposed his ideas were traitors, and why did we have so many of them?

And so on.

Before I give the floor to Mustafa, a last quote from Kundera:
"Haven’t I said that what makes a leftist a leftist is the kitsch of
the Grand March? The identity of kitsch comes not from a political
strategy but from images, metaphors and vocabulary." What you will
read below is the English translation of Mustafa Akyol’s Turkish
article which appeared in the Star newspaper on Nov. 4. Let’s now
look at the images of Kemalist Turkey:

"Kemalist Turkiye’yi tanıyalım" (Let’s get to know Kemalist Turkey),
Mustafa AKYOL

* "Everyone knows the ancient problem that Turkey is facing once
again following the uncovering of the ‘original signed’ copy of
the document. For some reason ‘Kemalist’ institutions and circles,
especially the Turkish Armed Forces [TSK] can’t seem to get along
with democracy. But why? An important panel discussion that shed
light on this question was organized by the ARI group at Bilgi
University, but I’ve just now found the chance to write about it. The
meeting was titled ‘Secularization and Modernization in Turkey,’
and the main speaker was Dutch historian Professor Eric Zurcher,
who is a renowned expert on Turkey’s recent past. Zurcher made a
presentation that offered a different look at the description of
‘Kemalist modernization.’ The core of his presentation was based on
concrete data and not ‘interpretations.’

* "He conducted a ‘content analysis’ of the propaganda magazine named
‘La Turquie Kemaliste,’ which the Kemalist regime published between
1934 and 1941 to promote their ideas and goals to the West. This
magazine, which was published in France, included a very limited
number of German and English articles, and while unfamiliar in Turkey
was very interesting.

* "The cover of the magazine featured determined, content and muscular
men managing giant industrial facilities and ‘working to achieve
goals.’ Zurcher underlined a point that almost everyone realized as
soon as they looked at the photos of the magazine. These images were
strikingly similar to the ‘socialist realism’ dominating in the Soviet
Union during the same period.

* "The pages of La Turquie Kemaliste were filled with photographs
of newly built monuments, sculptures and squares in Ankara that
were empty and frigid. The Dutch academic noted that this trend was
identical to the ‘fascist art’ used in Italy at the same period when
it was under the rule of Benito Mussolini.

* "There was no reference to religion and no element (e.g., a photo
of a mosque) that conjured up the idea that the majority of the
Turkish population was Muslim. The only word with Arabic origins in
the magazine was ‘Kemalist’ and that was changed to ‘Kamalist’ for
a while. That is because [Mustafa Kemal] Ataturk, who did not like
the name ‘Mustafa,’ used the world ‘Kamal’ as an ‘original Turkish’
alternative to the word ‘Kemal.’

* "Out of the several photographs used in the magazine, there was not
a single natural image of society. The small number of photographs
that featured people included models that were posing for the camera.

These included a villager with a rake in his hand looking up into
the sky with a big smile on his face, a female pilot with her helmet
and cheap glasses posing for the camera and "modern" Turks dressed
in clothes similar to those worn by English aristocrats watching a
delightful game of tennis.

* "In conclusion, there was no ‘society’ in Kemalist Turkey, only
‘subject models’ that posed according to the state’s ideals. Noting
that each of these points reflected a political mentality, Zurcher
said Kemalism was ‘idealist but authoritarian, pro-modernization
but uniformist.’ He also added that while this ideology could be
‘understandable’ in the 1930s, it could not be a guide for Turkey in
the 21st century.

* "See, the basic problem of our ‘shrewd guards’ who don’t like
democracy for some reason is that they are imposing an ideology
that should have been left in the 1930s as an ‘official ideology’
without even feeling the need to ‘revise’ it. The most tragicomic
part is that they are doing this in the name of ‘progressivism’."

ANKARA: Armenian Publishers Launch Turkish Literature Initiative

ARMENIAN PUBLISHERS LAUNCH TURKISH LITERATURE INITIATIVE

Today’s Zaman
Nov 6 2009
turkey

The virtual border between Turkey and Armenia will be crossed by
literature, following in the footsteps of protocols signed last
month between the two countries to re-establish diplomatic relations,
thanks to the efforts of Armenian publishers.

A number of Armenian publishers submitted applications to their
Turkish peers to get the oeuvres of 15 well-known Turkish poets
translated into Armenian as part of the Turkish Ministry of Culture
and Tourism’s long-running Translation Subvention Project (TEDA).

Among the poets whose work will be translated are Nazım Hikmet, Cahit
Sıtkı Tarancı, Orhan Veli Kanık, Oktay Rifat, Melih Cevdet Anday,
Attila İlhan, Necip Fazıl Kısakurek and Metin Altıok, among others.

A group of literary translators comprising lecturers from Yerevan State
University will translate the works into Armenian for publication
by the publishing house Amaras. The poetry leg of the project,
initiated by the Armenian Publishers Association and expected to be
completed in 2010, will be followed by the translation of selected
short stories and novels by Turkish writers, Ministry of Culture and
Tourism officials say. The ministry will lend support to the project
in both translation and publishing.

Around 30 Turkish literary works have been translated into Greek,
35 into Bulgarian and 10 into Arabic, in addition to the dozens of
titles translated into other major languages such as English and
German, as part of TEDA, which was launched in 2005.

ANKARA: Turkey’s ‘Faith Initiative’ Looks East

TURKEY’S ‘FAITH INITIATIVE’ LOOKS EAST

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 5 2009
turkey

Turkey’s Culture and Tourism Ministry says the Surp Hac Church on
Akdamar Island in Lake Van and the Monastery of Sumela in Trabzon will
be open for prayer once a year. Minister Gunay says that a cross will
be erected atop the roof of Surp Hac, just as it had been originally

Mainly spearheaded by efforts to bring prayers back into churches,
Turkey’s cultural initiatives are set to accelerate in 2010, according
to the Culture and Tourism Ministry.

The ministry said it is preparing to open the recently renovated,
historical Surp Hac Church for prayer once a year and affix a cross
to its roof in its original place. Also, the Monastery of Sumela in
Trabzon will be opened for prayer once a year.

Armenia pleased by developments

The protocols signed between Turkey and Armenia for the normalization
of relations has started to bear fruit. Minister of Culture and Tourism
Ertugrul Gunay, who has reached out to his Armenian counterpart through
the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review in the past, reiterated a
standing offer: "Let Armenian and Turkish experts restore the ruins
of Ani together."

The Ani excavation site, near the Armenian border in the Arpacay
District of Kars, was the capital of the Armenian Kingdom of Bagratunis
between 961 and 1045. The Daily News spoke to the International Council
on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) Armenian President Gagik Gurcuyan
about the offer. Gurcuyan expressed pleasure at the developments and
said that the organization will contact the Culture Ministry and will
happily work together to restore the site.

Gunay: ‘I may visit Armenia’

The Ani ruins caused a diplomatic crisis between Turkey and Armenia
years ago. Turkey filed a complaint to ICOMOS, an organization
affiliated with UNSECO, saying that explosions at Armenian stone
quarries are damaging the site. Gunay said the explosions have since
stopped, much to his relief. "Ani is a common legacy of humanity," he
said. "We must do all we can to pass it on to the future generations."

Gunay also told the Daily News he might visit Armenia. "As you
remember, President Gul has visited Armenia. If our President has
visited, there is no reason at all why I would not go, also," he said.

The dialogue began with Surp Hac

It is widely assumed that the dialogue process between Turkey and
Armenia started with the national football match last year. However,
the actual contact began with the restoration process of the Surp Hac
Church on Akdamar Island in Lake Van. Former Culture Minister Atilla
Koc contacted Gagik Gurciyan and invited the Armenian expert to visit
Turkey. Although coordinated efforts were realized despite the two
countries’ closed borders, heavy criticism was levied in Armenia and
among the diaspora following the church’s opening as a museum.

As it was initially reopened as a museum, no cross was placed on the
roof of the church. A replica of the original cross, made according
to the traditions of the Armenian Apostolic Church, was brought to
Istanbul by Armenian experts and delivered to Armenian Patriarch of
Turkey Mesrob Mutafyan. The cross is waiting at the Turkish Armenian
Patriarchate to be placed atop the restored church.

Legal problems

Minister Gunay spoke about the latest developments and delays.

"Unfortunately, there were some hitches with the laws that did not
allow historical churches to be opened for prayer," he said. "That
was the reason for the debates over the cross."

Gunay said the ministry is in the final stage of working out the
legal hitches and that similar problems will not be experienced in
Turkey in the future. Gunay said the cross would be placed atop the
church shortly and the building will be opened for prayer once a year,
if there is demand.

Prayer will also be allowed in Sumela

Along with Surp Hac Church, the Monastery of Sumela in Trabzon
will also be opened for prayer once a year. Last year, a group of
500 tourists from Greece, among them Thessaloniki Mayor Panayotis
Psomyadis and Russian Deputy Ivan Savidis, sought to light candles
at the monastery but were interrupted by Nilgun Yılmazer, museum
director of Trabzon. When reminded of this incident, Minister Gunay
said they would not allow such things to be experienced in Turkey
again and "all believers in these lands will follow their faiths’
requirements freely."

‘A late decision’

Architect Zakaria Mildanoglu, who was assigned by the Turkish Armenian
Patriarchate to the renovation of Surp Hac, evaluated the developments
as a late decision. Mildanoglu said former Minister Koc transferred
the matter to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the time. "The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs deals with foreigners. Minister Koc saw
the citizens of his own country as foreigners, but we have lived on
these lands for hundreds of years; we are not foreigners."

Sarkis Elbe, a prominent Armenian figure in Istanbul, said: "This is
a political decision. If only they had not waited for the signing of
the protocols just to make this decision."

Osman Köker, researcher and owner of Birzamanlar publishing, had
a different take on the developments. "Turkey is trying to play a
leading role in the region and to develop good relations with its
neighbors," he said. "Turkey also protects the rights of minorities
in the country."

Köker added that the process should be supported. "Opening religious
buildings of historical importance to visitors would boost the number
of tourists visiting our country."

ANKARA: Turkey Is Changing Its Shell

TURKEY IS CHANGING ITS SHELL

Hurriyet Daily News
Nov 5 2009
Turkey

Extremely interesting developments are taking place in the relationship
between Turkey and the European Union. In fact not only in its
relationship with the EU but also Turkey’s relation to external
relations in general started to experience a change.

I describe it as "Turkey splitting from the West and sliding toward
the East." But the prime minister says, "No, we are not changing
direction. We are only doing what we have to do." It does not matter
what you name it, what’s obvious is a change is taking place.

It would be easier if I give an example to explain what I mean.

During the Cold War, Turkey’s foreign relations were on a one-way road.

We were on the Western front and we called them allies. Usually
there wouldn’t be any problem in our relationship with our allies in
general. The opposite front was the communist front. We would treat
them like an enemy.

Within this frame we would move in the direction of European countries
and the U.S. Their politics would lead us. In the region, Israel
would be described as our ally, and Iraq and Syria our enemy.

Now the balance has changed.

Especially during the past two or three years of the AKP administration
new balances and new values emerged. What’s been experienced recently
created an interesting impression of Turkey starting new experiments
on external politics.

Turkey for the first time takes Eastern countries seriously

– Relations with Syria have advanced to a never-before-seen
dimension. Both countries have started to act almost in unison. And
this has naturally changed Ankara’s steps and direction.

– Rapprochement with Iraq and especially with northern Iraq is
developing into a never-before-seen dimension. Baghdad and Arbil’s
sensitivities are taken much more seriously by Ankara.

– Advances in the relation with Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan have
started to roll faster. Turkey now better understands these countries
and takes their attitudes much more seriously than before.

– Relations with Israel, on the contrary, are worsening
progressively. In relations that used to be carried out with extreme
caution, boorishness seems to spread. It appears as if they want to
punish Israel on every occasion.

– Besides all these changes, one other country progressively
approached by Ankara is the United States. Especially since the Obama
administration came to power, relations between Ankara and Washington
have tightened incredibly.

– Relations with Russia warm up as well. Turkey started to position
itself as a passageway for particularly Russia but also all other
countries rich in energy resources.

Turkey’s relation with EU somehow doesn’t get on track

After looking at all these developments, when we ask ourselves, "So,
where are relations with the European Union heading?" we are facing
very interesting scenery.

Looked upon from the outside it seems Turkey and the EU are trying to
split their way. The EU’s general reluctance still prevails. Brussels
still gives the cold shoulder and Ankara does not seem enthusiastic
about rolling up its sleeves to take action.

Especially French President Sarkozy’s general attitude is so negative
that it does not signal any hope for Ankara. The same is true for
German Prime Minister Merkel. Both quite often repeat that Turkey
needs to content itself with a privileged partnership instead of
full membership.

We are talking about two countries that are the founding members of the
European Union. This means that it is impossible to realize a project
that would be "negated" by these two countries. On one hand they keep
saying that they are in favor of a continuation of negotiations and
will decide over a full membership or privileged partnership down the
road and will not hinder it. On the other hand they do not deny having
started efforts to fill out the contents of a privileged partnership.

Sarkozy and Merkel take everybody’s enthusiasm

This attitude takes all the enthusiasm in the Turkish government as
well as the business world.

The Turkish private sector hesitates to invest for the sake of meeting
high cost liabilities required for the adaptation to the EU. No one
intends to allocate resources to a subject with uncertain outcome
while anxiety still persists due to an economic and financial crisis.

It also pressures the government to speed up in the EU process.

Almost the same is true for the government.

The administration does not intent to allocate billions of euros as
a resource while it still has a deficit in its budget and while it
is uncertain what will happen next.

When there is lack of power for motivation then somehow the process
does not speed up either.

Don’t get me wrong. Technical effort still continues but especially
laws to ensure political criteria cannot pass under these uncertain
conditions.

Turkey is in a new trial period

Let’s now answer the question asked in the beginning.

I think Turkey tries to satisfy the EU with different approaches and
keep the relationship going rather than fulfilling criteria required
for the membership process.

It tries to take steps which satisfy the EU in issues like the Armenian
and Kurdish Initiative and Iran and Afghanistan issues, and it also
tries to maintain the global picture with steps like signing Nabucco.

This is certainly in favor of some EU countries that would like to
slow down the process.

We need to pay attention to the matter that Turkey does not slip into
a trial period.

Turkey tries to find out whether the world would or would not spin
without the EU and whether or not to create a new world. If it turns
out to be a success then Turkey might continue its path by tightening
its relation with the U.S. and get closer to countries in its own
region.

But if this happens then Ankara might wish for the privileged
partnership which it definitely denies today.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Orange Arrives In Armenia

ORANGE ARRIVES IN ARMENIA

Wireless Week
nov 5 2009

November 5, 2009 – Orange launched mobile telecommunications services
in the Republic of Armenia today providing mobile phone users across
the country with the quality of service and innovative offers that
have become the hallmark of Orange’s reputation worldwide. With this
launch, Armenian customers will join a worldwide community of 126
million people spread across 29 countries who enjoy the benefits of
the Orange brand.

The launch of Orange services has been eagerly awaited in Armenia
following the award of the license on 19 November 2008. Despite
the relatively high penetration rate in the country (80%), there is
strong demand for the wide-ranging, innovative services that have
forged the reputation of the Orange brand across the world.

For the launch of its operations in Armenia, Orange has invested around
100 million EUR. In line with its strategy, the Group will provide
the expertise and investment necessary to ensure the development of a
high-quality 2G and 3G+ network offering nation-wide coverage. Indeed,
Orange will provide coverage for over 80% of the population. Orange
already employs over 300 people in the country and some 500 additional
people are employed indirectly through suppliers and third-party
retailers.

For its launch, Orange has already positioned itself as a strong
challenger to the two other operators already present on the market.

Orange will launch a series of innovative and attractive offers for
both individual consumers and the business community. These already
include a complete catalogue of mobile and data offers, as well as
an attractive range of international tariffs, with over 130 roaming
partners from the launch.

Orange Customer Service will be available from a toll-free hotline
24/7 in three languages (Armenian, Russian and English) to help to
answer any queries, provide information or give technical assistance
during the roll out of services and beyond. Customers will also be
able to stay informed about the latest offers from Orange on the
website , which officially went online today.

www.orangearmenia.am

Orange Launches A Mobile Network In Armenia

ORANGE LAUNCHES A MOBILE NETWORK IN ARMENIA

Cellular News
Nov 5 2009

Orange has launched its mobile network in Armenia, after winning an
operating license last November. For the launch of its operations,
Orange has invested around EUR 100 million, and provides coverage
for over 80% of the population.

Orange said that despite the relatively high penetration rate in the
country (80%), there is strong demand for the wide-ranging, innovative
services that have forged the reputation of the Orange brand across the
world. With a population of around 3.2 million people, including 1.1
million in the capital Yerevan, Armenia offers the Group significant
growth potential.

Orange already employs over 300 people in the country and some 500
additional people are employed indirectly through suppliers and
third-party retailers.

Commenting on the launch, Didier Lombard, Chairman and CEO of France
Telecom said: "We are very pleased to be able to enrich the lives of
Armenians by providing simple, innovative communications products
and services, with unrivalled value and a clear focus on customer
care. We are also proud to contribute to the economic development of
the Republic of Armenia".

Figures from the Mobile World show that the country ended the first
half of this year with a shade over 2.5 million subscribers. The
country has two incumbent operators, VivaCell-MTS and ArmenTel.

Artur Baghdasaryan And Robert Simmons Discuss Armenia-NATO Cooperati

ARTUR BAGHDASARYAN AND ROBERT SIMMONS DISCUSS ARMENIA-NATO COOPERATION

Tert
Nov 5 2009
Armenia

On November 5, Republic of Armenia National Security Council Secretary
Artur Baghdasaryan welcomed the delegation headed by NATO Secretary
General’s Special Representative for the Caucasus and Central Asia
Robert Simmons.

The parties discussed issues related to realizing activities planned
for 2009 by the Armenia-NATO Individual Partnership Action Plan. At
the request of the guest, Baghdasaryan presented work carried out
towards implementing the action plan.

Baghdasaryan said that, according to the Armenia-NATO Individual
Partnership Action Plan, reforms are made in the areas of defense,
justice, emergency situations, health care, and law enforcement. Much
importance was placed on the establishment of an emergency management
centre in Armenia, ensuring border security, the creation of necessary
infrastructures, strengthening of Armenia-NATO cooperation in the
fight against terrorism and organized crime.

Simmons expressed satisfaction with the implementation course of the
action plan and positively evaluated the progress made.

Baghdasaryan and Simmons also referred to regional issues. Simmons
stated that NATO supports the establishment process of Armenian-Turkish
relations, as well as OSCE Minsk Group’s activity in the settlement
of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, informs the Republic of Armenia
National Security Council Secretary’s press office.

Armenia And U.S. Sign Science And Technology Cooperation Agreement

ARMENIA AND U.S. SIGN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COOPERATION AGREEMENT

Tert
Nov 5 2009
Armenia

The Armenia-U.S. Intergovernmental Commission held a regular meeting
at the U.S. State Department on November 3. Armenian Minister of
Economy Nerses Yeritsyan headed the Armenian delegation.

U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia Coordinator Daniel Rosenblum
co-chaired the meeting. U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Tina
Kaidanow and Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the U.S.

to Armenia Marie L. Yovanovitch made welcoming speeches.

Improving the business environment in Armenia, the fight against
corruption, and reforms in democracy and management systems were
discussed during the session. The Armenian delegation presented the
achievements made in the mentioned spheres and measures planned for
the future.

The Armenian delegation also had separate meetings at the State
Department, Department of Commerce, Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative, World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

During the intergovernmental commission’s meeting, an agreement
on cooperation in the areas of science and technology, which will
promote cooperation between the two countries in the sectors of
information technology, intellectual property, and fundamental
sciences, was signed.