Armenia, Turkey Look Forward To Who Is Taking First Step

ARMENIA, TURKEY LOOK FORWARD TO WHO IS TAKING FIRST STEP

Aysor
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

"Armenia and Turkey are awaiting who will take the first step,"
said at today’s press conference head of Yerevan Hay Dat (Armenian
Tribunal, or Armenian Court of Justice) Office and representative
for ARFD Political Affairs, Kiro Manoyan.

"At least some months won’t bring any serious changes in ratification
process," he said adding that Armenian Revolutionary Federation
Dashnaktsutyun still holds on to its position. Kiro Manoyan says:
"as soon as possible Armenia must announce is not going to ratify
Armenian-Turkish protocols."

Referring to regional processes, Kiro Manoyan said that those "don’t
give rise to statements on ‘Turkey’s quick move forward’.

"Turkey won’t take any steps till February-March, then on the eve of
Remembrance Day of April 24 they will act to perform that things are
‘in progress’," said the politician bringing round that Turkey will
stretch the process as long as possible until its expected results
in the issue of Karabakh appear.

Congressman Frank Pallone Helps Give N.J. Democrats A Voice

CONGRESSMAN FRANK PALLONE HELPS GIVE N.J. DEMOCRATS A VOICE

The Star-Ledger – NJ.com
Nov 19 2009

WASHINGTON — Frank Pallone lazily stretches back on the leather chair
in his office, his long legs ranging forward toward his guest, an Army
officer in the new crisp dress blues that emulate Civil War uniforms.

It has been a long day for the congressman and weariness exaggerates
his usual laid-back look.

It made Pallone’s next words surprising:

"You know, I don’t even want to talk to you because you make me
so angry."

The guest, Lt. Col. Stephen Christian, the garrison commander at Fort
Monmouth, blushes and, for a moment, says nothing. Then he goes on with
his report as if Pallone had complimented him on his gold epaulets.

There is a long history to this moment. Over the years Pallone and
other New Jersey representatives have tried- unsuccessfully- to block
Fort Monmouth’s closing by the Pentagon.

Still, the incident illustrates the complexity of the congressman
from the state’s sixth congressional district. He is arguably the
most powerful Democrat in New Jersey’s House delegation, a consequence
not just of seniority but also his central role in developing the new
health care reform bill and other legislation and also his leadership
position with the Democratic majority — he’s in charge of the party’s
message, the man who lines up all those floor speeches seen by C-SPAN
viewers, if no one else.

Pallone also is among the hardest working — running the health
subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce panel that, in this
session alone, produced new food safety standards, extended health
care for children, and developed procedures for approval of new
medicines based on biological, rather than chemical, sources.

He is founder and member of scores of disparate Congressional caucuses,
ranging from American Indians to Asian Indians and Armenians; a
frequent fund-raiser for other Democratic representatives, even headed
Gov. Jon Corzine’s unsuccessful reelection efforts in New Jersey.

"He has built up a lot of points with the party," says Jeff Carroll,
his staff chief.

Yet twice Pallone gave up the chance to achieve what he admits has
been his goal almost since he was elected class president at the
Broadway Elementary School in Long Branch — a seat in the U.S. Senate.

The last time was 2002 when party leaders offered him the chance to
replace former Sen. Bob Torricelli who dropped out of the campaign.

"It just wasn’t right," he says. "I didn’t have the money, and I would
have come in just weeks before the election. There wasn’t enough time."

So the candidacy and the election went to the retired Frank Lautenberg
who, last year, with Pallone often at his side campaigning for him,
won re-election.

"I can imagine remaining here in the House, developing health care
legislation, serving the people in my district," he says with an almost
languid calmness that suggests acceptance, maybe even resignation.

Maybe. But, just as his anger poked through at Col. Christian, his
energy and ambition are frequently on display on Capitol Hill. He is
the last to leave the floor after a vote because he is busy approaching
others, persuading them to give floor speeches.

Pallone is the self-described "message man," carrying stacks of paper,
trailed by an aide, talking other Democrats into coming back to the
well of the House to speak in favor of health care reform or the
energy bill, or the stimulus package. He spends a lot of time in a
virtually empty chamber himself, often late into the night, speaking
to the C-SPAN camera, getting into the record, moving the message.

"It’s something we learned from Newt Gingrich and the Republicans
when they took over in 1994," says Pallone. "They knew how to stay
on message."

So 15 years ago he and Dick Durbin from Illinois and Charles Schumer
from New York — both representatives who went on to the Senate —
put together the message committee. Pallone arranges for early morning
meetings for Democratic House members each Thursday, bringing in
outside experts to reinforce the party’s policy.

Early mornings also are time for fund-raising breakfasts for other
members, less secure in their seats than is Pallone. Before 8 a.m. one
morning, he shows up at The Monocle, a Capitol Hill restaurant, where
a dozen people–many working in health care–pay up to $1,000 each
for omelet’s and the chance to hear him discuss health reform. The
money doesn’t go to Pallone but to the campaign of Anne Kirkpatrick,
an Arizona Democrat who has a tough race next year.

"The system is not sustainable," Pallone says, and outlines his views.

Within two hours, Pallone is running a committee "mark-up" of his
bill to improve food safety, the first major overhaul of the Food
and Drug Administration food monitoring activities in decades.

"The bill requires companies to put in place preventive controls," he
tells the session, a meeting that adopts the bill. He gets bipartisan
support.

At the end of the same day, he’s back on the speaking circuit,
showing up for the convention of the New Jersey Food Council —
representing food retailers and their suppliers — where he pushes
again for health care reform and talks about food safety.

The speech goes well — he is publicly and lavishly praised both by
the grocery executives and also by an FDA administrator attending
the session, but his aides hurry him out the door of the Grand Hyatt
Regency ballroom before the conventioneers begin to discuss a bill,
backed by Pallone, to make it easier for workers to form unions. The
aides don’t want a public scene — the congressman is well handled
by his staff.

But he doesn’t mind an argument and, meeting with liquor distributors,
he disappoints them by saying he will back the so-called Employee
Free Choice Act.

"I will help the economy," he says.

Pallone knows how to fight, and he shows that at yet another health
subcommittee hearing over the issue of "biologics" — medicines derived
from living organisms rather than chemical compounds. The issue is how
long the original developers of the expensive drugs can enjoy market
exclusivity before the equivalent of a generic market is allowed.

The issue is tricky because, with chemical compounds, generics are
exact copies of the original formula — but that’s not possible with
biologics. The aftermarket can only produce "similars," medicines
with biologically similar DNA.

Pallone backs a shorter period of exclusivity than that demanded
by big pharmaceutical firms. At the hearing, he notes most of those
arguing for market control "all have a financial interest." In the
end, he will compromise — "splitting the baby," he calls it. Not so
long as the drug companies wanted it, not as short as he did.

"That’s what it’s about here," he says.

The grandchild of Italian immigrants pursued an educational background
suggesting that, even at a young age, he was preparing for a wide
stage. A degree from Middlebury College in Vermont, a graduate
degree in international studies from Tuft’s Fletcher School of Law
and Diplomacy and a law degree from Rutgers-Camden. He was elected
to the Long Branch school board and city council, the state Senate,
and, in 1988, to the House. He is the most senior Democrat in the
New Jersey delegation.

"Once I was elected back in elementary school, I wanted to expand
the scope of my interests–to be able to do more for more people,"
says Frank Pallone."

Israel Supports Armenians People In Struggle For Historic Justice

ISRAEL SUPPORTS ARMENIANS PEOPLE IN STRUGGLE FOR HISTORIC JUSTICE

news.am
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

In the light of chill in Israeli-Turkish relations, as well as Israel
and Jewish lobby’s role in Genocide recognition, NEWS.am reporter
had a conversation with the source engaged in the matter. The source
preferred to speak on the condition of anonymity under "Aralez"
pseudonym.

Q: Israel is an active partner of Azerbaijan and strategic ally
of Turkey. Tel-Aviv is one of the major opponents of Armenia on
the Armenian Genocide issue (following Turkey). Why Armenia-Israel
relations failed to establish? What is the reason? No mutual interests?

A: Regarding the strategic alliance between Israel and Azerbaijan, the
main reason is Israel’s need of having a political ally among Islamic
countries, since Israel is in a hostile geo-political location. Other
reasons are mostly economical, since Azerbaijan is an oil rich country,
which has a financial potential and is willing to purchase Israeli
defense system, same reasons is true about Turkey.

About Israel being one of major opponents of the Armenian Genocide
recognition is my point of view, is simply not so, being an activist
for the official recognition by Israel, I know that people of Israel
support the Armenian people in their struggle for Historic justice,
the problem is the lack of awareness among the general Israeli
population and the lack of strong pro-Armenian lobby.

About why Armenia and Israel didn’t established diplomatic
relationships is because Armenia was a republic in the USSR which
was anti-Israeli in its politics. I think that right now a strong
partnership between the 2 countries is indeed possible since Armenia
is an independent country. Jewish and Armenian people have many things
in common dating to the ancient history.

As you know the Turkish-Israeli alliance is at lowest point so far,
since Turkey has decided to show her true face in international
politics, as the famous Turkish saying goes: "there is no friend
to a Turk but a Turk. Lately I hear more and more voices calling
to establish full term relationship between Israel and Armenia and
to immediately recognize the Armenian Genocide. I personally think
that both countries should do all they can to become partners on an
international level!!!

Q: Majority of U.S. congressmen confess that many issues in the
Congress and Senate are adopted under the pressure, with the approval
and bidding of Jewish lobby. It is known that Armenian lobbyists are
not less influential. What is the conflict of these lobbies’ interests?

A: On a Jewish lobby subject it’s true indeed that some groups are
trying to prevent the issue of Armenian genocide being brought up
before the US congress, never the less a growing number of Jewish
organizations in the US support the recognition on a government level,
during the Bush administration the congressmen that brought up the
discussion were Jewish.

Q: What is the state of protection of Armenian church interests in
Jerusalem? What is the true reason for disagreement between Armenian
and Greek clergy? Does Armenian church has sufficient potential to
protect its part there and right to hold services in Church of the
Holy Sepulchre?

A: Regarding the Armenian Church in Jerusalem, Israel tries to keep
the statuesque in general but in my opinion should do more in that
direction. The latest conflict between Armenian and Greek churches are
nothing new, since the early times of Christianity in the holy land
the Greek Church tried to destroy the influence of Armenian Church
in order to become the strongest in Jerusalem in same cases it ended
with Armenian blood shed. Fortunally the Armenian Church thanks to the
strong will and faith of its leaders continued to blossom until our
time. Right now the Armenian and the Armenian quarter of Jerusalem
are facing a lot of problems which could be solved with the support
of republic of Armenia, since in my personal view certain circles
in the Israeli government want to minimize the power of the Armenian
church for their political gain.

Baku: Ali Huseynov: "Statement By Any Embassy Or Representative Of F

ALI HUSEYNOV: "STATEMENT BY ANY EMBASSY OR REPRESENTATIVE OF FOREIGN MINISTRY ON ARREST OF BLOGGERS IS THE INTERFERENCE IN DOMESTIC AFFAIRS OF AZERBAIJAN"- INTERVIEW

APA
Nov 19 2009
Azerbaijan

Baku. Elbrus Seyfullayev – APA. APA’s interview with chairman of
parliament’s committee for legal policy and statehood Ali Huseynov

-The Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe appointed new rapporteur for Azerbaijan yesterday. We would
like to know opinion.

-The rapporteurs for Azerbaijan should be unbiased, properly assess
the ongoing processes in the country and describe it in their reports.

We are observing the ongoing processes, tension, civil confrontation in
Armenia. But the rapporteurs for this country shut their eyes to this,
always try to introduce the country in positive aspect. We do not need
someone to demonstrate different opinion on the democratic reforms in
Azerbaijan, our commitments vis-a-vis the Council of Europe. We want
the ongoing processes in Azerbaijan to be reported objectively. So,
we want the new rapporteur to be unbiased. We have witnessed biased
attitude much. We hope the new rapporteur will be unbiased and we
will establish effective relations.

-When will the appointment of the rapporteurs for Azerbaijan finish?

-Azerbaijan is a country under monitoring. By the way, we always raise
the issue to stop the monitoring process. There will be rapporteur
for the country, as the monitoring process exists.

-Secretary General of the Council of Europe and embassies of several
countries in Azerbaijan expressed severe reaction to the court ruling
on the bloggers. What is your attitude toward it?

-First of all, we should differentiate among the position of
international organizations, embassies and foreign ministries.

Azerbaijan is the member of the Council of Europe. We have chosen
the way of integration into Europe. We have a number of commitments
vis-a-vis this organization. They are connected both with legislation
and human rights. So, it is normal hat the Secretary General of the
Council of Europe expresses his view on the above-mentioned case. They
express their views on the election process, state of human rights. It
is quite another matter whether this view is negative or positive. It
is generally acceptable that the Secretary General of the Council
of Europe expresses view on any problem. But I do not agree to the
severity of this view. There is some contradiction here. The Secretary
General expresses his concern over the strictness of the court ruling.

Then it is noted that this ruling is connected with the expression of
speech, not with hooliganism. If the question is the strictness of the
punishment, it means that the essence of the ruling, i.e. accusation
is accepted. It turns out that they principally admit the accusation
on hooliganism. But they are concerned that the punishment is strict.

So, there is contradiction in the statement.

I think they should take more gentle position on this issue. They had
to learn the essence of issue and then to express opinion. This idea
should be more balanced.

– How do you characterize the reaction of embassies?

– Regarding embassies of some countries, it is other question. First of
all, it is not understandable how the embassy or foreign ministry
official of some countries could issue such statement. It is
interference in our domestic affairs. Officer of Azerbaijani Army
Ramil Safarov was arrested in Hungary and was sentenced very hardly.

Do we put the Hungarian court system under the question? We search for
legal ways to assist him. As a lawyer, I think that Ramil Safarov’s
conviction was very hard. It should be not a life sentence, but other
sanction. But our embassy and Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn’t
give a note. It means that statement of one country about the legal
system, human rights and other domestic issues of another country
is confronting with the international law. It was correct that the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan expressed its opinion.

Generally Norway takes biased position on the processes in Azerbaijan.

Non-governmental organizations established and funded by Norway
are also meddling in the election and other processes. But I have
different opinion about Germany. We have very close relations
with Germany. It has unbiased position on many issues, including
Nagorno Karabakh conflict. But there was hasty decision as a result
of relations created by different correspondences. It is abnormal
case when the government agencies show such position and it should
be ended. The situation is clear and legal ways should be found
in this condition. Some people say that there is an experience of
arrest of bloggers in other countries. But there is concrete charge
on hooliganism. People can not be arrested for freedom of expression
in all countries, including Azerbaijan. There are not such cases
in our countries. Therefore I am against such parallels. The charge
is concrete and it is an element of hooliganism. If someone doesn’t
accept it, he must prove its opposition. The approach should be so.

– When will the parliament approve new Human Rights Commissioner?

– First of all, I have to say that amendments to the Constitutional law
on this issue should be put to vote six months later. The six-month
term has not expired yet. The parliament didn’t receive any proposal
or candidacy for the new Human Rights Commissioner.

– Can the incumbent Human Rights Commissioner be elected for the
next term?

– It will be decided by the parliament vote. I have to say that the
law allows that.

Ishkhan Zakaryan: Corruption "Only Extortion And Bribery" In Armenia

ISHKHAN ZAKARYAN: CORRUPTION "ONLY EXTORTION AND BRIBERY" IN ARMENIA

news.am
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

The RA Supervisory Chamber will release a report on the corrupted
field in Armenia, Head of the Chamber Ishkhan Zakaryan told a press
conference held jointly with Jacek PaweÅ~B Jezierski, Head of the
Supreme Chamber of Control of Poland. According to Zakaryan, "it is
difficult" to name the most corrupt fields in Armenia, as "corruption
is presently defined only as extortion and bribery" in Armenia.

His counterpart, however, was not afraid to name Poland’s most corrupt
fields – police and the health system. Although mass bribery has been
done away with in the fields – the employees realize it is a criminal
offence – Mr. Jezierski admits individual cases. The privatization
field is part of the risk group, he said. In some cases, certain
circles tried to pressure Parliament members into adopting laws or
amendments in the circles’ interests. The situation developed when
the Parliament was discussing the bill on gambling industry. The bill
was never adopted, and an ad hoc parliamentary commission is dealing
with the issue.

The Supreme Chamber of Control (Polish: Najwyższa Izba Kontroli,
usually abbreviated the NIK) is the supreme audit institution and
also one of the oldest state institutions in Poland, created under
the Second Republic on February 7, 1919, barely 3 months after the
restoration of Poland’s independence.

Leaders To Meet On Karabakh, Pressure For Progress

LEADERS TO MEET ON KARABAKH, PRESSURE FOR PROGRESS

Reuters
Nov 19 2009
UK

TBILISI, Nov 19 (Reuters) – The presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan
will hold talks on Sunday on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, France
said on Thursday, with Turkey pressing for progress before it seals
a rapprochement with Armenia.

Fifteen years of mediation have failed to produce a peace deal on the
Armenian-populated mountain territory, at the heart of a key transit
region for oil and gas to the West.

But a historic thaw between Armenia and close Azeri ally Turkey —
which has significance for Turkey’s EU membership bid and landlocked
Armenia’s crisis-hit economy — has thrust the conflict back into
the diplomatic spotlight.

Turkey says it wants to see progress on Nagorno-Karabakh before
it ratifies a deal to open its border with Armenia and establish
diplomatic ties, overcoming a century of hostility stemming from the
mass killing of Armenians by Ottoman Turks.

The French Foreign Ministry, in a statement posted on its website,
said Armenia’s Serzh Sarksyan and Azerbaijan’s Ilham Aliyev would
meet on Sunday at the French consulate in Munich.

The negotiations are led by a trio of mediators from the United States,
Russia and France working under the Organisation for Security and
Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).

Backed by Armenia, ethnic Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh threw off
rule by Muslim Azerbaijan in fighting that erupted as the Soviet
Union headed towards its 1991 collapse. Some 30,000 people died and
more than 1 million were made homeless.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993 in solidarity with
Azerbaijan. Ethnic Armenian forces took control of Nagorno-Karabakh and
seven surrounding Azeri districts, including a corridor to Armenia. A
ceasefire was agreed in 1994.

The Munich meeting will be the sixth this year, an intensity fuelling
speculation about a possible breakthrough. Mediators say they are
making progress, but diplomats caution that neither side appears
ready to commit to difficult concessions and sell them to their people.

"Azerbaijan is standing at the middle of the bridge, and waiting for
the other side to approach," Azeri Deputy Foreign Minister Araz Azimov
said on Thursday.

Sarksyan is already under fire from nationalists at home over the thaw
with longtime foe Turkey, making a deal on Nagorno-Karabakh even more
unpalatable, analysts say.

Mediators are working on a deal that would see the return of many
of the Azeri districts held by Armenians, in return for greater
international legitimacy for the Nagorno-Karabakh authorities and a

Armenia Doesn’t Mediate Talks On Upper Lars Checkpoint

ARMENIA DOESN’T MEDIATE TALKS ON UPPER LARS CHECKPOINT

Aysor
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

"If Russia and Georgia come to terms in negotiations on Upper Lars
checkpoint’s opening, Armenia will only welcome this developing,"
told Aysor’s correspondent Armenia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman,
Tigran Balayan.

Armenia is not an official mediator in negotiations between Georgia
and Russia, so Armenia’s Foreign Ministry has no detailed information
related to last developments in the process.

On November 13 Georgia’s Security Council made a decision to open Upper
Lars checkpoint at Russia-Georgia border. The checkpoint closed in 2006
by Russian-made decision, conditioned by ‘some reconstruction’. This
led to a deep reduction in exporting of Georgian goods as well as it
much influenced supply to Armenia. Upper Lars checkpoint provided 30%
of land freight to Armenia.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Hovik Abrahamyan Received Jacek Jezierski

HOVIK ABRAHAMYAN RECEIVED JACEK JEZIERSKI

news.am
Nov 19 2009
Armenia

November 19, 2009 RA NA Speaker Hovik Abrahamyan received Chair of the
EUROSAI Governing Board and the President of Polish Supreme Chamber
of Control (NIK) Jacek Jezierski.

Abrahamyan hailed significant Jezierski’s visit to Armenia within
the framework of Armenian-Polish bilateral cooperation development,
as well as Armenia’s involvement in European structures’ activities,
RA parliamentary press service informed NEWS.am.

Abrahamyan also expressed content with operations of RA Control Chamber
drawing Jezierski’s attention to the steps of legislative and practical
guarantees ensuring independence of RA Control Chamber. The officials
agreed that from the effective activity viewpoint the determinant
factor of supreme control bodies is independence.

Hovik Abrahamyan presented Jacek Jezierski the cooperation between
RA National Assembly and Control Chamber, as well as its substance in
the context of operating expenses of budgetary resources and provision
of effective control.

Is Turkish Deal Reshuffling Armenian Politics?

ARMENIA: IS TURKISH DEAL RESHUFFLING ARMENIAN POLITICS?

EurasiaNet
Nov 19 2009
NY

Political observers in Yerevan are watching for signs of a political
deal between President Serge Sargsyan and his most vocal critic,
Levon Ter-Petrosian.

In surprise comments made on November 11, Ter-Petrosian said that the
Armenian-Turkish rapprochement agreement, signed in October, presented
Sargsyan as "a realistic and resolute statesman worthy of the 21st
century," Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Armenian service reported.

While taking issue with Sargsyan’s agreement that a group of historians
should investigate the 1915 slaughter of ethnic Armenians by Ottoman
Turks, Ter-Petrosian accused the Armenian Revolutionary Federation
(ARF)-Dashnaktsutiun, a vocal critic of the Armenian-Turkish deal,
of throwing "non-existent sins" onto the tally of "numerous sins
committed by Sargsyan," RFERL reported.

In response, Kiro Manoian, an ARF spokesperson accused Ter-Petrosian
of trying to make backroom deals with Sargsyan while publically
maintaining his image as the administration’s sworn enemy, the Tert
news agency reported on November 18.

Lemkin: Holodomor ‘Classic’ Genocide

LEMKIN: HOLODOMOR ‘CLASSIC’ GENOCIDE

Kyiv Post
Nov 19 2009
Ukraine

Today at 22:09 | Lubomyr Luciuk Rafael Lemkin who coined the term
‘genocide,’ called the Holodomor a classic case of Soviet genocide.

Only seven people came to bury him. He rests beneath a simple stone
in New York’s Mount Hebron cemetery, the sole clue to his historical
importance an inscription incised below his name – "Father Of The
Genocide Convention."

As a graduate student I was obliged to read his book,Axis Rule in
Occupied Europe: Laws of Occupation, Analysis of Government, Proposals
for Redress, frankly more door-stopper than page-turner. Nowadays,
with advocates for "humanitarian intervention" shilling the notion of a
"duty to intervene" whenever and wherever necessary to "stop genocide,"
Dr. Raphael Lemkin’s name and words are better known. After all he
fathered the term "genocide" by combining the root words -geno(Greek
for family or race) and -cidium(Latin for killing) then doggedly
lobbied United Nation member states until they adopted a Convention
on Genocide, on Dec. 9, 1948, his crowning achievement.

Because of the horrors committed by Nazi Germany in World War II
what is often forgotten, however, is that Lemkin’s thinking about an
international law to punish perpetrators of what he originally labeled
the "Crime of Barbarity" came not in response to the Holocaust but
rather following the 1915 massacres of Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians
within the Ottoman Turkish empire.

Likewise overlooked were Lemkin’s views on Communist crimes against
humanity. In a 1953 lecture in New York City, for example, he
described the "destruction of the Ukrainian nation" as the "classic
example of Soviet genocide," adding insightfully:"the Ukrainian is
not and never has been a Russian. His culture, his temperament, his
language, his religion, are all different…to eliminate (Ukrainian)
nationalism…the Ukrainian peasantry was sacrificed…a famine was
necessary for the Soviet and so they got one to order…if the Soviet
program succeeds completely, if the intelligentsia, the priest, and
the peasant can be eliminated [then] Ukraine will be as dead as if
every Ukrainian were killed, for it will have lost that part of it
which has kept and developed its culture, its beliefs, its common
ideas, which have guided it and given it a soul, which, in short,
made it a nation…This is not simply a case of mass murder. It is
a case of genocide, of the destruction, not of individuals only,
but of a culture and a nation."

Yet Ukraine’s declaration that the Great Famine of 1932-1933 (known as
theHolodomor)was genocide has secured very little official recognition
from other nations. Canada is among those few. Most have succumbed
to an ongoingHolodomor-denial campaign orchestrated by the Russian
Federation’s barkers, who insist famine occurred throughout the
USSR in the 1930’s, did not target Ukrainians and so can’t be called
genocide. They ignore key evidence – the fact that all foodstuffs were
confiscated from Soviet Ukraine even as its borders were blockaded,
preventing relief supplies from getting in, or anyone from getting
out. And how the Kremlin’s men denied the existence of catastrophic
famine conditions as Ukrainian grain was exported to the West.

Millions could have been saved but were instead allowed to starve.

Most victims were Ukrainians who perished on Ukrainian lands. There’s
no denying that.

A thirst for Siberian oil and gas explains why Germany, France and
Italy have become Moscow’s handmaidens, refusing to acknowledge
theHolodomorand blocking Ukraine’s membership in the European Union,
kowtowing to Russia’s geopolitical claim of having some "right" to
interfere in the affairs of countries in its so-called "near abroad."

More puzzling was a 28 January 2009 pronouncement by Pinhas Avivi,
deputy director-general of the Israeli Foreign Ministry: "We regard
theHolodomoras a tragedy but in no case do we call it genocide…the
Holocaust is the only genocide to us." Yet if only theShoahis genocide
what happened to the Armenians, or to the Rwandans, not to mention
to those many millions of Ukrainians?

This year, Nov. 28 (fourth Saturday of November) is the date on which
theHolodomor’svictims will be hallowed. Thousands of postcards bearing
Lemkin’s image and citing his words have been mailed to ambassadors
worldwide with governments from Belgium to Botswana, from Brazil to
Bhutan, being asked to acknowledge what was arguably the greatest crime
against humanity to befoul 20thcentury European history. There is no
doubt that Lemkin knew the famine in Soviet Ukraine was genocidal. If
the world chooses to ignore what he said than what this good man
fathered – the word "genocide" – will lose all meaning, forever more.

Professor Lubomyr Luciuk teaches political geography at the Royal
Military College of Canada and edited Holodomor: Reflections on the
Great Famine of 1932-1933 in Soviet Ukraine(Kashtan Press, 2008).