Tigran Balayan Says It Is Early To Speak About The Bilateral Meeting

TIGRAN BALAYAN SAYS IT IS EARLY TO SPEAK ABOUT THE BILATERAL MEETINGS OF THE ARMENIAN FOREIGN MINISTER IN ATHENS

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 23, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 23, ARMENPRESS: "As of this moment we can only say
that Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandyan will participate in
the OSCE Ministerial Council in Athens," spokesman for the Armenian
foreign minister Tigran Balayan told Armenpress in a phone conversation
from Italy. The spokesman did not provide any information about the
bilateral meetings of the Armenian minister within the framework of
the gathering, noting that it is early to speak about them.

The statement of the OSCE Minsk group co-chairs about the results of
the Munich meeting of the Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents says
that as a next step the meeting of the foreign ministers of the two
countries is expected to be organized in early December in Athens on
the eve of OSCE Ministerial Council.

Samvel Farmanyan: "It Has Been Stated Many Times That The Core Of Th

SAMVEL FARMANYAN: "IT HAS BEEN STATED MANY TIMES THAT THE CORE OF THE NEGOTIATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS IS THE ISSUE ON THE STATUS OF NAGORNO KARABAKH. THE REST OF THE ISSUES ARE SECONDARY"

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 23, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 23, ARMENPRESS: Spokesman for the Armenian President
Samvel Farmanyan with the request of Armenpress news agency commented
on the statements of the Azerbaijani president and on certain
publications of the Azerbaijani press.

– A day before the Munich meeting the president of Azerbaijan made a
regular military statement, threatening with war. What will Armenia
do if the tension connected with the Nagorno Karabakh conflict really
increases?

– We have already had an occasion to note that no matter how much
such statements are being voiced for the inner audience, at the same
time they hardly create favorable atmosphere for the negotiation
process. The statements of the Azerbaijani president once again
witness about the unconstructive position of Azerbaijan.

The increase of tension over the Nagorno Karabakh conflict of course is
the most undesirable result. It will be the most undesirable reality
for Nagorno Karabakh, Armenia and the whole region. But the Republic
of Armenia cannot be indifferent toward the fate of Nagorno Karabakh
people and that is why the President of Armenia and other officials
have many times stated that we are responsible for the security of
the people of Nagorno Karabakh. There are adopted ways in the world:
in case of such developments, for instance, the Republic of Armenia may
recognize the independence of Nagorno Karabakh with all the stemming
consequences. Secondly, the Republic of Armenia may sign a contract
of mutual assistance with the Republic of Nagorno Karabakh.

There are ways, and I am sure that the Republic of Armenia will make
use of these few variants separately or simultaneously. And I must
note that the Republic of Armenia has not by now recognized the
Nagorno Karabakh Republic for only one reason – not to impede the
negotiations over the peaceful regulation of the conflict. And if
the peaceful negotiations are interrupted and military actions launch
nothing will hinder Armenia to recognize the independence of Nagorno
Karabakh. But today the reality is that the negotiations continue.

Armenia has always stated that it does not see alternative to
the peaceful regulation of the issue. Armenia thinks that through
negotiations it is possible to reach peaceful and comprehensive
settlement of the issue.

– After the Munich meeting certain Azerbaijani mass media spread
information as if during the negotiations it was spoken that by
the end of the year Armenians might liberate Kelbajar region which
will give Turkey an opportunity to ratify Armenian-Turkish protocols
and Azerbaijan to smooth its position in the pre-context of Nagorno
Karabakh conflict settlement. How much does it correspond to reality?

– In Armenia it became usual for us that after each meeting of the
Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents the "strictly aware" sources report
about the not existing discussions and arrangements. It is a clear
disinformation and has no relation with reality. Such issue is not
being discussed, consequently there cannot be such arrangement. It
has been stated many times that the core of the negotiations and
discussions is the issue on the status of Nagorno Karabakh. The rest
of the issues are secondary.

NA Vice President Samvel Nikoyan Meets Members Of Ago Group

NA VICE PRESIDENT SAMVEL NIKOYAN MEETS MEMBERS OF AGO GROUP

National Assembly
Nov 23 2009
Armenia

On November 21 RA NA Vice President Mr. Samvel Nikoyan met the members
of the Monitoring Committee of Ministers’ Committee (Ago Group) of
the Council of Europe led by the permanent representative of Romania
in CoE, Ambassador Mr. Stelian Stoyan.

At the guests’ request Mr. Nikoyan presented the works done by the
Ad-hoc Inquiry Committee into the Events Occurred on 1-2 March 2008
in Yerevan and Their Reasons, the main direction of the final report
and his stance on the current works.

Mr. Nikoyan noted that as a result of hard work, the Ad-hoc Committee
presented a brief objective and unbiased conclusion. Examining the
events the Committee had based on the exact facts, that was the
reason that there was no grounded criticism neither by power, nor by
opposition. Mr. Nikoyan added that the two parliamentary opposition
factions were positive on the presented report. The NA Vice President
noted that for excluding the repetition of the events the NA Ad-hoc
Committee had presented proposals on the solutions of the problems in
political, judicial-legal, social-economic, protection of human rights
and other spheres, and for this he considered necessary to set up a
Monitoring Group. Mr. Nikoyan said that the issue was under discussion:
to assign to any standing committee, or set up a new ad-hoc committee.

The guests expressed their gratitude to Mr. Nikoyan for the
information, and the complicated and thorough work done. They
expressed hope that Mr. Nikoyan would work in implementing the
proposals mentioned in the report.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BAKU: Great Part Of Turkish Society Against Opening Of Turkish-Armen

GREAT PART OF TURKISH SOCIETY AGAINST OPENING OF TURKISH-ARMENIAN BORDER: AZERBAIJANI MP

Today
Azerbaijan
Nov 23 2009

Day.Az: Do you believe the Turkish and Armenian parliaments will
ratify the protocols signed between the countries?

Anar Mammadkhanov: I think that the Armenian parliament will ratify
the Turkish-Armenian protocols and will require a similar step
from the Turkish side. But the Turkish parliament, which is really
democratic and dependent on views of country’s people, will ratify
the Turkish-Armenian protocols until liberation of Azerbaijan’s
Armenian-occupied territories.

Q: What will happen next once the scenario you suggest is realized?

A: It will be followed by a mutual accusations which will give a rise
to more actively involvement in a regular process of reconciliation
efforts by leading world powers. But an attempt to exert pressure on
Turkey, for example, from the U.S. and the EU is doomed to failure
like an attempt by Madame Gritsatsuyeva to regain Ostap Bender, who,
incidentally, was presented as a son of Turkish official. Indeed, in
response to them, the U.S. and the EU, but not Madame Gritsatsuyeva
will hear absolutely reasonable and truthful statement of the Turkish
leadership that it is unable to influence decisions by its own members
of parliament.

After this scenario happens, I do not rule out that the Armenian side
will experience equally unpleasant emotions, such as those experienced
by archivist Korobeinikov who issued a free warrant indicating location
of the chairs searched by "great schemer". It is possible that the
Armenians will all together sing "the old song about the main thing"
in chorus claiming that Turkish-Armenian protocols make no mention
of the Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

But no one will listen these chants. Armenia is a country which over
a dozen years ignored the fact that Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity
is recognized all over the world and numerous UN resolutions and other
influential international organizations call for the liberation of
all occupied Azerbaijani territories.

Secondly, we live in a world of real politics. The realities imply that
vast majority of representatives of Turkish society are against opening
of Turkish-Armenian border without the return of Armenian-occupied
Azerbaijani territories. Therefore, people engaged in real politics
need to understand that the Turkish government delays ratification
of the Turkish-Armenian protocols.

In addition, Turkish authorities have reiterated on many occasions
that these are two parallel processes and Azerbaijan enjoys larger
geopolitical and geo-economic importance in the world.

Q: Former Armenian Foreign Minister Alexander Arzoumanian said that
the protocols will be ratified after a breakthrough in resolving
the Karabakh issue. Recently, similar statements are made in Armenia
more frequently. Does this mean that the process of disillusion has
started in the Armenian society?

A: I believe it is a forced disillusion. There are different causes
for the forced disillusion. First, it is like a case when a man who
loves to drink runs out of money and no one lends it to him.

Secondly, it is similar to a case when a body no longer takes alcohol.

So, there is parallelization of the two causes of forced disillusion
in Armenia. Armenia faces a terrible economic situation that has led
to a loss of interest to Armenia by investors while the "the body" –
the mind of citizens of this country has refused to accept the idea of
living in seclusion, knowing that the only way to "cure" lies through
normalization of relations with all its neighbors which implies the
return of all Armenia-occupied territories of Azerbaijan. This is
understandable. After all, we still see only the first results of
the impact of global economic and financial crisis on Armenian economy.

Next will be even worse.

So, it is high time to sobber up. Otherwise, figuratively speaking,
it would be too late to drink mineral water owing to neglect of kidney
disease: a real war threatens the complete loss of Armenian statehood.

Q: Will the factors you cited lead to an adequate, fair position
by the Armenian government in the negotiations to settle the
Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict?

A: I am convinced that Armenia’s isolation caused by the occupation of
Azerbaijan’s territories was sooner or later bound to increase external
and internal problems of this country. After all, we are dealing with
a classic case of "boomerang effect", when evil launched to the sky
returns back in a form of very painful sensations. Years have passed
and growing number of citizens in Armenia begin to understand this. I
hope that leaders of this country will also understand it.

I would be appropriate to quote Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev who
said: "Personally, I have no doubt that the Azerbaijani lands will be
liberated from the invaders. The main question is whether by peaceful
or military ways." To be exact, Azerbaijan will never reconcile with
the loss of its land and is ready to return them in any way. Remember
the thesis by Winston Churchill’s, brilliant politician and diplomat
who brought the theory about what losses can a state afford during
a war without undermining foundations of its nationhood and gene pool.

Azerbaijan is ready to return Armenian-occupied territories through
military means without risking to undermine the foundations of
statehood and gene pool. Armenia, on backdrop of its current poor
economic and demographic status, is not ready for hostilities
and they could be the beginning of end of its statehood. This is
the most powerful argument for the Armenian leadership to take a
truly constructive stance in the negotiation process to settle the
Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Number Of Cooperation Issues Between Russian And Armenian Eastern Sc

NUMBER OF COOPERATION ISSUES BETWEEN RUSSIAN AND ARMENIAN EASTERN SCIENCES INSTITUTES DISCUSSED

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 23, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 23, ARMENPRESS: Russian ambassador to Armenia
Vyacheslav Kovalenko visited today the Institute of Eastern Sciences
of the Armenian National Academy of Sciences. An official from the
NAS information-analytical center told Armenpress that during the
conversation with the director of the Institute Ruben Safrastyan the
sides discussed issues on consolidation and deepening of scientific
ties between the institute and Russian Eastern Sciences center,
as well as a number of cooperation issues.

Armenian First Lady Rita Sargsyan Receives The Armenian Participants

ARMENIAN FIRST LADY RITA SARGSYAN RECEIVES THE ARMENIAN PARTICIPANTS OF "EUROVISION 2009" JUNIOR INTERNATIONAL SONG CONTEST

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 23, 2009
YEREVAN

YEREVAN, NOVEMBER 23, ARMENPRESS: Armenian first lady Rita Sargsyan
received today Laura Hayrapetyan who represented Armenia at "Eurovision
2009" junior international song contest and the dance group performing
with her. Armenian Culture Minister Hasmik Poghosyan was present at
the meeting. R. Sargsyan, congratulating the children noted that they
came forward at the contest very well highly honoring Armenia. "After
the contest I received a lot of calls from different countries,
all presented their admiration for the children’s performance. They
presented our country in Europe with honor, whole Armenia is proud
of them. I can say surely that the "football ball" of this song has
appeared in the goal of the 12 participant-countries", R. Sargsyan
said. She donated computers to the children and wished them new
successes.

H. Poghosyan congratulating the children, too, noted they have
presented quite a confident and a good performance. "I want the
children never lose the confidence they have achieved. I wish them
great successes", H. Poghosyan said. She donated musical literature
to the children and promised that next year they will leave for
summer camp.

Twelve year-old L. Hayrapetyan living in Russia is very glad for
her participation in junior "Eurovision 2009". She said that it is a
great success for her to occupy the second place in a similar contest.

"Of course, it was difficult, there was a great competitiveness there,
but we were well-prepared, we were in high spirits and we did our best
for good performance", L. Hayrapetyan said. She has started singing
when she was four; besides "Barcelona" she has composed other songs
as well.

BAKU: Regional Security System To Promote Settlement Of Conflicts In

REGIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM TO PROMOTE SETTLEMENT OF CONFLICTS IN SOUTH CAUCASUS

news.az
Nov 23 2009
Azerbaijan

News.Az interviews Mehdi Sanaei, Prof. of Tehran University, Director
of Center for Research on Russia, Central Asia & Caucasus.

Iran has repeatedly offered its mediation services in the resolution
of the Karabakh conflict while Baku was skeptical about it as in 1992
the next day after Azerbaijan and Armenia concluded a reconciliation
agreement under Iran’s mediation, Armenian troops attacked and occupied
Shusha. What do you think about it?

I think Iran trusts Azerbaijan. In general, Iran pays great attention
to Azerbaijan and highly appreciates elations with Azerbaijan. But
conflicts are usually very complicated, therefore, it is not easy
to settle them. But the regional security system would be useful for
the settlement of all existing conflicts.

Do you consider it possible to create the regional security system
in conditions when there are conflicts between the regional countries?

This system is really needed for the settlement of conflicts because
20 years showed that such system supported by non-regional countries
failed to settle the problem.

Which system of regional security can be spoken of in our region
where there are three poles-Russian, western and Iranian? How can
these countries unite to create a general security system?

I think along with having differences these countries also have
common interests. If the regional countries are able to distance
from western states for the purpose of settling conflicts and pay
attention to regional security, we will get the best results.

Armenian-Azeri Leaders Hold Talks

ARMENIAN-AZERI LEADERS HOLD TALKS

CCTV, China Central TV
20091123/102063.shtml
Nov 23 2009

The presidents of Azerbaijan and Armenia have met for talks on
the Nagor-no_Kara-bakh conflict. Azeri President Il-ham Ali-yev
and Armenia’s Serz-h Sarks-yan met on Sunday at the French Consul
General’s residence in Munich, Germany.

A French meditator said "important progress" has been made while some
difficulties have been identified during the four-hour talks. Tensions
over the breakaway mountainous region in Azerbaijan are rising.

Oil-producing Azerbaijan has been angry at a deal between Turkey and
Armenia to reopen their borders, 16 years after Ankara closed it in
solidarity with Azerbaijan during the Nago-rno-Kara_bakh war. Ali-yev,
warned on Saturday that Azerbaijan’s military is ready to take back
the mountainous territory by force.

Backed by Christian Armenia, ethnic Armenians in Nagor-no_Kara-bakh
threw off rule by Muslim Azerbaijan in 1991. The territory is still
seeking independence after 15 years of international mediation since
the 1994 cease-fire.

http://english.cctv.com/program/worldwidewatch/

Heads Of State News Agencies Discuss Issues On Preparation For The C

HEADS OF STATE NEWS AGENCIES DISCUSS ISSUES ON PREPARATION FOR THE CELEBRATIONS DEDICATED TO THE 65TH ANNIVERSARY OF VICTORY IN THE GREAT PATRIOTIC WAR

ARMENPRESS
NOVEMBER 23, 2009
MINSK

The council of the state news agencies of the CIS countries called
today its tenth session to discuss issues on the joint preparation
for the celebrations dedicated to the 65th anniversary of victory in
the Great Patriotic War.

The program of preparation to this event includes particularly
publication of a memorial calendar, conduction of special photo
contest, implementation of joint Internet project. The members of
the council will also discuss the events dedicated to the year of
veterans of the Great Patriotic War which will be conducted in 2010
in CIS countries.

The session will also discuss issue on preparation of journalist
staff for the news agencies, issues on possibility of cooperation
with the leading educational establishments of the CIS countries. The
participants of the session will also discuss prospects of cooperation
in creation of joint information product.

The information council consists of state news agencies of Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia,
Tajikistan. The council is headed by the general director of ITAR-TASS
Vitali Ignatenko.

A Morgenthau Legacy

History News Network
Arnold Reisman

A Morgenthau Legacy

Nov 23 2009

Mr. Reisman is listed in Who’s Who in America, and is a Fellow of the
American Association for the Advancement of Science. The the latest
of his six books on modern Turkey’s history is SHOAH: Turkey, the US,
and the UK.

A new exhibit opened at the Museum of Jewish Heritage in New York
City. It is titled: The Morgenthaus: A Legacy of Service and will run
through December 2010. The Morgenthaus are a unique American family
both wealthy and powerful and among them three Morgenthau generations,
Henry Morgenthau, Sr., Henry Morgenthau, Jr., and Robert M.

Morgenthau, have contributed greatly to America’s history. While all
three men were well connected politically, both Henry Morgenthau Sr.

and Henry Morgenthau Jr. were in positions of great influence at
times when the fate of European Jewry hung in the balance. Raised
in Jewish homes, though not particularly observant, both men were
esteemed members of America’s German Jewry1.

As an immigrant himself Henry Morgenthau Sr. was determined to make a
difference as an American. Having achieved success in law and business
by age 55, he was able to devote the remainder of his life to public
service. He became a key player on the world stage during World War
I as Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, under President Woodrow Wilson.

In the first two years of his post, he witnessed the extreme poverty of
Jewish settlers in Palestine and the plight of the Armenians. He called
international attention to the sufferings of minorities in the Empire,
and helped supply direct aid and relief. His work as Ambassador–and
his service to humanitarian causes–had a profound impact on the
course of history in the first half of the twentieth century.2

Morgenthau Sr., had in fact assimilated into the fabric of America
so much so that he became very close to Woodrow Wilson; hence the
appointment as ambassador. The museum site3 tells us that as Ambassador
to the Ottoman Empire, he became greatly concerned about the dire
poverty in which the Jews of Palestine were living. To help them,
he sent a telegram to Jacob Schiff asking for funds.4

Morgenthau Sr. was in the Ottoman Empire when the massacres of
Armenians occurred and was outraged when he learned the details. That
became a cause he championed for the rest of his life.

His son Henry Morgenthau, Jr. was born into a family deeply committed
to public service. Beginning his career on a farm in Dutchess County,
his life’s work would be defined by his passion for agriculture and
his friendship with neighbor Franklin Delano Roosevelt. As Secretary
of the Treasury, Morgenthau worked to strengthen America’s economy
during the Great Depression, and to prepare the Allies for WWII.

During the Holocaust, he urged President Roosevelt to take
action–leading to the creation of the War Refugee Board in 1944.5

As Secretary of the Treasury from 1934 to 1945 he helped to develop
and institute War Bonds.

The first Series ‘E’ U.S. Savings Bond was sold to President Franklin
D. Roosevelt by Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau. The bonds sold at
75 percent of their face value in denominations of $25 up to $10,000,
with some limitations. The war bonds actually were a loan to the
government to help finance the war effort.

The War Finance Committee was in charge of supervising the sale of all
bonds, and the War Advertising Council promoted voluntary compliance
with bond buying. The work of those two organizations produced the
greatest volume of advertising in U.S. history. In the name of defense
of American liberty and democracy, and as safe havens for investment,
the public was continually urged to buy bonds. 6

The Museum of Jewish Heritage, which publicizes itself as "A Living
Memorial to the Holocaust", declares that its mission is to "tell the
story of the Jews before, during and after the Holocaust." While it
has done a masterful job creating a detailed exhibit about this family,
in the case of Henry Sr. and Henry Jr., a great deal has been omitted
about the "role" of both men before and during the Holocaust, a role
that could have saved the majority of the 6,000,000 who perished. A
museum that purports itself to be a memorial to the Holocaust
ought to tell a complete story but perhaps it is understandable
that unflattering information about the Morgenthaus is not part
of this exhibit considering that Robert Morgenthau is listed as the
museum’s Chairman of the Board. The website does provide the following
unexplained insight.

Like his father, Henry Morgenthau, Jr. would be challenged throughout
his career to balance American and Jewish agendas, which often seemed
at odds with each other. 7

Indeed there were many challenges for the Morgenthaus to balance
their American and Jewish agendas. In 1933 E. Finlay Freundlich,
an astronomer and an early collaborator with Albert Einstein,8 was
forced out of his position as Director of the Potsdam, (Germany)
observatory that he had founded, because his wife was Jewish. Soon
thereafter Freundlich was invited to Istanbul to help create Turkey’s
first observatory.9 The Freundlichs had met the Morgenthaus years
earlier and were obviously on friendly terms with the family because
upon their arrival in Istanbul in 1933, Freundlich wrote a three-page
letter to Morgenthau Sr.10 After dispensing with the social niceties,
Freundlich vividly described what was happening to Jewish intellectuals
back home and pleaded for help from his well connected friend in
America. He asked Morgenthau Sr. to become involved not only by
sounding the alarms but by persuading the people in power to act and
do something to help those who were going to be mowed down by the
Nazis. Morgenthau’s reply is disconcerting. See paragraph 2.

A letter dated February 17th 1934 from Henry Morgenthau Sr. to E.

Finlay Freundlich his friend in Istanbul11

Perhaps Freundlich’s pleas presented a challenge to that delicate
"balance between American and Jewish agendas" that is mentioned in the
exhibit. At any rate, it appears that Sr. was not up to the challenge
because he opted out stating in a manner one would call a brush off
that he was just too busy with American matters.

Henry Morgenthau Jr., like other administration officials, was aware
of the plight of European Jews and as a friend of the President’s he
was in a unique position of both influence and assistance. But here
again, the delicate balance between a Jewish agenda and an American
agenda was challenged.

On May 13, 1939 the luxury liner St. Louis left Germany with 900
passengers, most of them German Jews with documents for entry into
their destination, Cuba. When the ship arrived, however, Havana refused
to allow the passengers to disembark. The St. Louis sat in the harbor
for days, running out of fresh food and water for the 900 people who
were terrified that they would be returned to Nazi Germany.

After frantic international negotiations that were meant to allow
all the refugees to disembark, only 29 passengers were permitted to
land in Havana. The ship was then ordered to leave, which it did,
maneuvering slowly and tantalizingly near the coast of Florida hoping
for permission to disembark its passengers somewhere on American soil.

The U.S., led by Secretary of State Hull and President Roosevelt,
ordered the U.S. Coast Guard12 to keep the ship from port. So, it
changed course and sailed for Europe.

In his book, While Six Million Died: A Chronicle of American Apathy,
Arthur D. Morse13 claimed that the U.S. Coast Guard cutter CG-244
"shadowed the St. Louis, with orders to prevent any refugees from
jumping overboard and swimming ashore."

While the Coast Guard has pictures of all of the ships that were
ever in its service and logs of other incidents, all archivists
contacted at the USCG claim to have no logs, nor any other record of
USCG Cutter 244. Nor does the Fort Lauderdale USCG Station have any
archival documents pertaining to the 244, not even a photo, which
would correspond to the transcripts.

Transcripts of two telephone conversations, one initiated at 3:54 PM
on June 6, 1939 by the Secretary of Treasury to Commander Earl G. Rose
at U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters14 followed by another call at 3:59
PM15 show that above all else, Morgenthau wanted to make sure that
"[t]here would be nothing in the papers"16

Morgenthau wanted no publicity about this incident that would make the
United States government appear heartless or unfeeling to the plight
of refugees or cause any backlash among Roosevelt’s Jewish supporters.

Yet according to the New York Times of June 8, 1939,

After extensive negotiations, the St. Louis docked at Antwerp on June
17, 1939: 214 passengers remained in Belgium, 224 went to France and
181 to the Netherlands. Another 288 passengers went ashore in Britain
on June 21.

History tells us that as the years went on and America entered the war,
the United States did nothing to help European Jewry, a fact which
several decades later still boggles the mind. The American Jewish
community, still extremely wary of encouraging widespread anti-Semitic
and anti-alien sentiments, felt their own situations would become more
difficult if a flood of poor, eastern European immigrants came into
their communities. American Jews were ambivalent and timorous when
lobbying for rescue efforts and they were torn by bitter infighting
principally between Zionists and non-Zionists.

Influential and well connected German American Jews consistently
underplayed the perils of their fellow Jews in Europe while wishful
thinking, sloth and business-as-usual attitudes undermined whatever
efforts were made.17

Led by Rabbi Stephen Wise (1874-1949), the American Jewish Congress
encouraged a boycott of German goods in 1933. Later, during the war,
a different group of Jews led by the Warburgs, bankers whose German
branch of the family had helped found the chemical giant I.G. Farben
(makers of Zyklon B gas used in the death camps) in the 1920’s and
members of Roosevelt’s inner circle visited the President and told
him (via German American Jews’ requests) that "things aren’t all that
bad in Germany."18

… "Jews who were close to the President did very little to encourage
rescue action." Samuel Rosenman, Special Counsel to the President and
his principal adviser on Jewish matters, "considered the rescue issue
politically sensitive, so he consistently tried to insulate Roosevelt
from it." Rosenman opposed formation of a rescue agency, deliberately
watered down a war-crimes declaration so as to eliminate what he
considered "excessive emphasis on the Jews" and argued consistently
that "government aid to European Jews might increase anti-Semitism
in the United States."19

As the museum correctly states Morgenthau Jr. "urged President
Roosevelt to take action–leading to the creation of the War Refugee
Board in 1944." Why did this happen at such a late date? Lawyer Josiah
DuBois Jr., a non Jewish junior staffer at Treasury was going through
some State Department documents and happened upon papers that spelled
out virulent anti-Semitic immigration policies including a document
signed by Breckinridge Long, State’s Under Secretary, immigration
Czar and a rabid anti Semite.20

These documents sent to all staff at State and to all US embassies
and consulates gave complete, how-to instructions on keeping Jewish
immigrants out21 especially with such "Catch 22-type" regulations
in place like the "criminal record" prohibition which by definition
considered those who had been released from concentration or labor
camps criminals and therefore excluded them from immigration. The
"LPC" (likely to become a public charge) prohibition excluded many
Jews since they were not allowed to take any wealth with them when
they left Nazi territory and would arrive destitute. Finally the
"contract labor" prohibition cut off those who could not show that
they would become LPC because they did not have a guaranteed job offer
America. There were other rules to obstruct visas. "American consuls
in Germany [were instructed] not to give visas to Germans [Jews]
without passport or without permission to leave the country … not
to issue immigrant visas to anyone without evidence of a booking on a
ship due to sail within four months … have the ability to pay for
passage and affidavits of support from American relatives."22 This
left many Jews stuck in Germany as Hitler rose to power.

Outraged, Du Bois and two of his asssociates wrote their findings in a
report,23 presented it to Morgenthau Jr. and threatened to go public
with the damaging information in an election year unless FDR swiftly
changed matters at the State Department. Within a week FDR issued an
order proclaiming the War Refugee Board mentioned by the Museum.24
Why did it take so long for action? Could this have been yet again
another challenge to the balance between Jewish and American agendas?

Epilogue

About his father’s conversion "to the cause," Henry Morgenthau
III wrote:

In this climate of Jewish evasiveness it is significant that the
initial breakthrough to my father’s conscience [late in 1943] was
achieved by three zealous Christian Treasury lawyers he trusted and
respected. The most senior member of the triumvirate was Randolph
Paul whom my father brought into the Treasury to draft tax reform
legislation. The two junior members were John Pehle, then thirty-five
director of the Foreign Funds Control Board (subsequently director
of the War Refugee Board), and Josiah E. DuBois the thirty-two-year
old assistant to the general Counsel.25

According to the Museum website:

The exhibition explores the fascinating ways in which three generations
of a family raised awareness of tragedy around the world, and in
doing so changed the course of world events, American politics,
and Jewish history.

>From its video transcripts we obtain these insights into the
individuals.

Lazarus Morgenthau (Father of Morgenthau Sr.) was determined to make
it as an American. (narrator.)

Henry Morgenthau Sr. was determined to insure a greater level of
success. (narrator)

And significantly, Joan Morgenthau Hirshborn, daughter of Henry
Morgenthau Jr. stated "My father changed enormously as a result of
what went on during the Holocaust. He got very much interested in
Israel as a sanctuary for Jews. Totally changed our feeling about,
you know, our heritage." (emphasis added) One can understand that
the enormity of the Holocaust would have an impact on Jr. who did
too little much too late. This, too, is part of the Morgenthau Legacy.

1 For at least three generations this community considered itself
at the top of the social strata among American Jews with their own
elite golf clubs and synagogues. Intermarriage with establishment
Protestants was more acceptable than marriage to any east European
Jew no matter how accomplished or wealthy.

2

3 Ibid

4 Ibid

5 Ibid

6

7

8 Anonymous "Einstein to Modify Theory of Relativity As Light Study
Shows Calculations Wrong, Photographic Method Explained."

Special Cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES. June 13, 1931

9 Reisman,A. Turkey’s Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Ataturk’s
Vision (Washington, DC: New Academia Publishers. 2006) pp191-5 10
Courtesy E. Finlay Freundlich Archives St. Andrews University, St
Andrews Scotland.

11 Courtesy E. Finlay Freundlich archives St. Andrews University, St
Andrews Scotland. For a further explanation see Reisman A. Turkey’s
Modernization: Refugees from Nazism and Ataturk’s Vision (Washington,
DC: New Academia Publishers. 2006) pp 26, 34, 39, 40, 191-7, 227,
232, 233, 235, 266, 284-6, 320, 330, 331, 335-65.

12 The US coast Guard has always been an agency of the Department of
the Treasury.

13 Morse, A.D. While six million died; a chronicle of American apathy
(New York, Random House 1968)

14 Coast Guard History:

15 Ibid

16 Coast Guard History:
an2.asp

17 Sherman, A.J. DOOMED BY THE INDIFFERENCE-AND WORSE, The New York
Times, December 16, 1984.

18 Geidner, Chris "A Question of Integrity: The United States’
Treatment of Jewish Refugees During World War II" 2000,
html

19 Sherman, A.J. DOOMED BY THE INDIFFERENCE-AND WORSE

20 A full transcript of the document appears in Reisman,A. SHOAH:
Turkey, The US and the (Charleston, SC: BookSurge Publishing. 2009),
The actual photocopy of the document will appear in Reisman A.

PERFIDY: Britannia and her all-Jewish army units.

21 There are excellent secondary sources for the reader to consider.

Among them are: Richard Breitman and Alan M. Kraut, American Refugee
Policy. Berenbaum, M. The world must know: the history of the
Holocaust: and Laquer, W. and Baumel, J.T. The Holocaust encyclopedia.

Morse, A.D. While six million died; a chronicle of American apathy;
Feingold, H.L. The politics of rescue; the Roosevelt administration
and the Holocaust, 1938-1945; Gilbert, M. Never again: a history
of the Holocaust; Friedman, S. S. No haven for the oppressed;
United States policy toward Jewish refugees, 1938-1945; Perl,
W. The Holocaust conspiracy: an international policy of genocide;
Wasserstein, B. Britain and the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945; Bolchover,
R. British Jewry and the Holocaust. The list can go on and on.

However, in The Myth of Rescue, William D. Rubenstein provides much
statistical data to support his premise that America and the UK did
do all that could have been done to save Jewish lives, an unorthodox
point of view indeed. Interestingly the word "Turkey" does not appear
in his lengthy and detailed index.

22 Richard Breitman and Alan M. Kraut, American Refugee Policy: p 75

23 Specifically the "Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of
this Government in the Murder of the Jews," written by Josiah E.

DuBois, Jr. , (1913-1983) a Treasury Department official, played
a pivotal role in exposing State Department obstruction of efforts
to provide American visa to Jews trying to escape Nazi Europe. In
no uncertain terms the report said that FDR was "guilty not only
of gross procrastination and willful failure to act, but even of
willful attempts to prevent action from being taken to rescue Jews
from Hitler." One of many facts in the report: "By the act of 1924,
we are permitted to admit approximately 150,000 immigrants each
year. During the last fiscal year only 23,725 came as immigrants. Of
these only 4,705 were Jews fleeing Nazi persecution." None of these
facts should surprise the more knowledgeable.

24 For further information on this episode see Reisman, SHOAH: Turkey,
the US and the UK, (BookSurge, 2009)

25 Morgenthau H. III, Mostly Morgenthaus: (New York: Ticknor & Fields,
1991) p 323.

http://hnn.us/articles/120352.html
http://www.mjhnyc.org/morgenthaus/index.html
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1682.html
http://www.mjhnyc.org/morgenthaus/index.html
http://www.uscg.mil/history/faqs/St_Louis.asp
http://www.uscg.mil/history/faqs/HullMorg
http://www.geocities.com/crgeidner/refugees.