BAKU: PACE Co-Rapporteurs For Armenia Offer This Country’s Voting Ri

PACE CO-RAPPORTEURS FOR ARMENIA OFFER TO DISPOSE THIS COUNTRY’S VOTING RIGHTS

Azeri Press Agency
Dec 18 2008
Azerbaijan

Baku. Lachin Sultanova-APA. Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) Monitoring Committee co-rapporteurs for Armenia
offer to dispose this country’s voting rights, PACE Monitoring
Committee co-rapporteur for Azerbaijan Andres Herkel, who attended
the Committee’s Paris meeting, told APA.

He said report on fulfilling of PACE resolutions 1609/1620 about
the situation of democratic institutions in Armenia was heard at the
meeting and it was concluded that the issue of political prisoners is
still topical in the country. The Committee urged its co-rapporteurs
to visit Armenia again until the January session and to learn the
situation.

Russia-Georgia relations were also on the focus of the Paris
meeting. PACE members expressed their concern over this issue. They
stated that Russia didn’t fulfill its duties to withdraw troops from
the territories not related to Abkhazia and South Ossetia, to create
opportunities for the internally displaced persons to return home,
particularly to fulfill PACE summon to eliminate its decision to
recognize Abkhazian and South Ossetian independence. Herkel said both
issues would be widely discussed at the PACE January session.

BAKU: Lithuania Considers Azerbaijan Island Of Stability In South Ca

LITHUANIA CONSIDERS AZERBAIJAN ISLAND OF STABILITY IN SOUTH CAUCASUS: AMBASSADOR

Trend News Agency
Dec 18 2008
Azerbaijan

Azerbaijan, Baku, Dec. 18/ Trend Capital, N. Abdullayeva/ Interview
of Kestutis Kudzmanas, ambassador of Lithuania to Azerbaijan, with
Trend News.

Question: How do you assess current political, economic and cultural
ties between Azerbaijan and Lithuania?

Answer: Lithuania and Azerbaijan has held intensive political dialogue
for the last two years. The mutual visits of Presidents also prove
this. The Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev tripped to Lithuania
twice and Lithuanian President Valdas Adamkus tripped to Azerbaijan
several times.

During high level meetings, over 10 intergovernmental documents on
economic and political cooperation between Lithuania and Azerbaijan
were signed. Our businessmen became more active in your markets. Less
than 10 Lithuanian companies operated in the Azerbaijani market a
year and half ago when I began as an ambassador. Now there are over
200 Lithuanian companies in Azerbaijan. Our businessmen consider
Azerbaijani market successful.

Question: What measures are needed to be taken to enhance bilateral
cooperation and what are priorities for the next year? What assistance
can Lithuania render in Azerbaijanââ~B¬â~D¢ s integration to the
European Union within the framework of Eastern Partnership? Can
Azerbaijan benefit from Lithuaniaââ~B¬â~D¢s experience?

Answer: We will need more specified cooperation in near
future. Lithuania can offer much to Azerbaijan. First of all, the
experience that Lithuania gained during EU, NATO and World Trade
Organization admission. All processes including formalization of our
rights, standards and enhancing skills of staff can be helpful for
Azerbaijan in all these fields and can speed up Azerbaijanââ~B¬â~D¢ s
integration into the European Union.

Lithuania successfully shares its experience and Azeri specialists
from Ministry of Defense and State Border Service are trained in
Lithuania. Lithuanian customs agencies set example for the entire
Europe and we can offer Azerbaijan our experience in this sphere.

Lithuania is interested in Twining programs between European Union and
Azerbaijan, conformance of legislation and documents to international
standards and Lithuania will offer its experience to Azerbaijan within
this program. It can further encourage Azerbaijan-EU cooperation in
line with Eastern partnership.

Lithuania considers Azerbaijan an island of stability in the South
Caucasus. Of course, we are aware of the problems related to the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and latest events in Georgia. Armenia
has caught up in isolation and entire Caucasus is in tension. These
ââ~B¬Â~Xfrozen conflictsââ~B¬â~D¢ influence not only region, but
also the European Union in indirect way. Lithuania is interested in
enlarging zone of security and resolution of these conflicts. We are
hopeful that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict will be settled by peaceful
means. Azerbaijan is an example of stability in pragmatic policy in
the region. This policy yield positive results regarding security
of energy supplies. New routes for transit of hydrocarbon from the
Caspian region to the European markets are closely linked with the
security of the region. Europe needs to make its own contribution to
security in the South Caucasus and the Caspian region.

Question: Lithuania signed Baku Declaration at the end of the energy
summit in Nov. which calls for the establishment of European-Asian
corridor in an attempt to transport hydrocarbon resources from the
Caspian region to international markets. What is Lithuaniaââ~B¬â~D¢s
role in this process?

Answer: Lithuania was one of those to initiate European
Unionââ~B¬â~D&# xA2;s energy policy. EU is interested in diversification
of supply routes to Europe. Azerbaijan can be one of the largest
suppliers who can ensure energy security of whole Europe, not only
of Lithuania. We consider Azerbaijan a country with a promising
future. Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan, Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum and Nabucco will
yield results. Azerbaijan makes every effort to open new trans-Caspian
corridors to the European markets. Even if Azerbaijani oil and gas
is not directly re-transported to Lithuania, it will be delivered to
the European markets and an energy gap in Europe will be reduced. It
will be easier for Lithuania to negotiate with Russia. At present, the
country totally depends on Russian oil and gas. But this dependence
is mutual. If Azerbaijan becomes larger supplier of alternative oil
and gas to the European markets, it will easier for us to found
a common ground with our only supplier ââ~B¬" Russia. There are
realistic prospects of delivery the Azeri oil to the Lithuanian
markets. Lithuania consumes around 12mln tons of oil a year. We buy
Russian gas mainly from Primorsk. We can also receive Caspian oil.

Question: In what other fields of cooperation does Lithuania
interested?

Answer: Energy is not only factor of Azerbaijan-Lithuanian
cooperation. Lithuania and Azerbaijan have found many fields to
cooperate for last years. Possessing of wastes and protection of
environment is carried out at large scale in Lithuania. Lithuanian
ecologist can share experience of cleaning polluted areas and building
purification units in settlements. Our country is a leader in Europe
in this sphere.

The cooperation in the field of medicine could be very
interesting. Lithuania is a leader in cardiosurgery. Our doctors can
help in raising skills of their Azeri counterparts. We have projects on
protection of health of mother and baby, cardiosurgery and improving
skills of medium medical personnel. We have submitted these projects
to Azerbaijan for consideration and await feedback.

Lithuania has worldwide brands. Lithuania has maintained very good
image in several technical fields. It has developed more under
conditions of the European Union. Lithuania has well-known brand
dairy products all over the world. We produce household appliances,
refrigerators and television sets. All these spheres of production
can have their share in Azerbaijani market as well. We are interested
in delivery of furniture to Azerbaijan. Lithuania produces furniture
worth $1bln a year. We export it mainly to the United Kingdom and EU.

Tourism can be viewed as another field of cooperation. We have resorts
and sanatoriums of international importance where Azerbaijani citizens
would be welcome.

–Boundary_(ID_YyxQZii64u18Sww3xALd4w)–

Tbilisi Witnesses Unholy Row

TBILISI WITNESSES UNHOLY ROW
By Fati Mamiashvili and Sara Khojoyan

Institute for War and Peace Reporting
Dec 18 2008
UK

Call for commission to settle long-running dispute over ownership of
Tbilisi church.

At around midday on November 16, 22-year-old Alexander Oganov saw a
bulldozer next to the Armenian church named "Holy Norashen" in the
old town district of the Georgian capital, Tbilisi.

In the churchyard, Oganov saw that the tombstones of 19th century
Armenian benefactor Mikhail Tamashev and his wife Lidia had been
prized up from the ground. The young man photographed the scene on
his mobile phone and then called the police.

"In the churchyard I saw Father Tariel, who is the priest of the
Georgian church next door to Norashen," said Oganov. "He told me,
‘Don’t worry, we’re cleaning the churchyard and levelling the ground
and we will put the tombstones back later’."

Later, after the police arrived, the tombstones were indeed put
back. But this did not prevent a furious row from breaking out,
with Armenian parishioners complaining that the Georgian priest had
insulted the memory of the dead.

The episode has rekindled the long-running row between the Georgian
Orthodox Church and the Armenian Apostolic Church over the ownership
and upkeep of a number of churches on Georgian territory. Amongst them
is the Norashen church in Tbilisi, which the Armenians lay claim to
but which is still owned by the Georgian state.

The row was poorly covered in the Georgian media, with television not
devoting any attention to it at all. In Armenia, however, a series
of angry articles was published, some of them accusing Georgians
of carrying out "enforced Georgianisation" of Armenian churches
in Georgia.

After, Armenian bloggers leapt into action, a protest rally was held
outside the Georgian embassy in Yerevan on November 27, with the
demonstrators demanding the Georgian authorities stop destroying
Armenian cultural monuments.

Vardan Astzatrian, head of the department of nationalist minorities
and religion in the Armenian government, called the incident an act
of vandalism.

"This kind of thing can only happen in a country which is not taking
proper care of things," said Astzatrian. "Moreover, this kind of
action can be very dangerous for the maintenance of stability which
is very important now in the region."

However, Father Tariel, the Georgian priest at the centre of the row,
told IWPR that there had been merely a misunderstanding.

"I would never dishonour graves, even if they were the graves of
[medieval Muslim conquerors of Georgia] Jalal ad-din and Shah Abbas,"
said the priest. "The ground had sunk in that place and I wanted to
level it out again but they didn’t let me."

Mikhail Avakian, spokesman for the Armenian diocese in Georgia, said
he doubted Father Tariel’s version of events. "Cleaning up is the
job of the appropriate mayoral service and not Father Tariel," he said.

This was the latest episode in a long-running quarrel between the
local Armenians and Father Tariel. In May, he had a fence built
alongside one of the walls of Norashen covered in Georgian orthodox
symbols. The priest said he had done this with the permission of the
mayor’s office to help protect the church.

The Armenian diocese called for the fence to be taken down – something
which has not yet been done.

Father Tariel says the Armenians are causing trouble because they want
to get their hands on the Norashen church, whose origins are disputed.

According to Georgia’s 2002 census, Armenians comprise 7.6 per cent
of the population of Tbilisi. A century ago, the Armenian population
in the city was much larger. Georgians and Armenians view the history
of the city in completely different ways.

The Armenian diocese says that Norashen is an Armenian church dating
back to the 15th century. Avakian said that in the 1930s the Bolsheviks
closed it for worship, used it as a book warehouse and handed the
building over to the local government.

The Georgian historian Bondo Arveladze says that Norashen was illegally
built by Armenians on the ruins of an Orthodox church.

"In the archives you won’t find any document authorising its
construction issued by the tsar or the patriarch of that time,"
said Arveladze.

Ever since Georgian regained its independence in 1991, the Armenian
diocese has tried unsuccessfully to recover Norashen. The church
is still owned by the ministry of economics, with the ministry of
culture responsible for its upkeep.

Nikloloz Antadze, who is responsible for the protection of monuments at
the ministry of culture, said that Norashen was not in need of urgent
help and that the issue of its restoration was not on their agenda.

The doors of the church are currently locked. One of the last men
to gain entrance was Father Tariel, a decade ago. He briefly began
holding Georgian services there.

"I didn’t break into the church I simply opened the doors," said
Father Tariel. "The wooden alter was already rotten, we erected a
Georgian one in its place and started to conduct services there,
although the patriarch soon stopped us from doing that."

The Armenian and Georgian churches have agreed to resolve their
differences over Norashen and five other disputed churches, but the
commission tasked with doing this has not yet been set up.

"The political authorities have to form a commission which will
put an end to this conflict," said Levan Ramishvili, head of the
non-governmental Liberty Institute. "If the church is Armenia then
it ought to be given back to the Armenians. The commission should
first establish whose it is."

Armenian prime minister Tigran Sarkisian reportedly raised the issue
during informal talks with his Georgian counterpart on a visit to
Tbilisi on December 9.

In the meantime, the Georgian-Armenian society Nor Serundi (meaning
New Generation) has taken on the role of mediator in the dispute.

"We live together in Georgia and nothing should divide us," read
the slogan of around 300 Armenians and Georgians who formed a human
chain linking a series of Georgian and Armenian churches, amongst
them Norashen. The head of the society, Mari Mikoyan, blamed people
for whipping up tensions about this issue.

"This country is still in a state of war," said Mikoyan, whose father
is Armenian and whose mother is Georgian and who was awarded a medal
for her services as a front-line doctor in the August war over South
Ossetia. "Anyone who artificially raises the issue of disputed churches
and tries to trade on it is an enemy of his people and religion!

"The time has come for historians, cultural scholars and diocesan
officials to think about this."

Fati Mamiashvili is a reporter with Rustavi-2 television in
Tbilisi. Sara Khojoyan is a reporter with Armenianow.com in Yerevan.

ANKARA: Turkish Presidency Says Armenian Campaign A Sign Of Free Atm

TURKISH PRESIDENCY SAYS ARMENIAN CAMPAIGN A SIGN OF FREE ATMOSPHERE

Dec 18 2008
Turkey

A group of people issued an apology on the internet for the events
of 1915 boosting a nationwide discussion.

The Presidential Press Center has said that President Abdullah Gul
considered recent discussions in the Turkish public opinion and
academic circles over the events in 1915 a sign of existence of a
democratic discussion atmosphere in Turkey which was more civilized and
freer than many other countries and of Turkish people’s reconciliation
with their history and their self-confidence.

The Presidential Press Center said in a statement on Thursday that
Gul had always clearly expressed Turkey’s ideas and proposals about
the events and Turkish-Armenian relations on numerous occasions and
in many international platforms.

"During Gul’s term in office as the foreign minister and deputy
prime minister, Turkey proposed Armenia to establish a committee of
historians to examine Turkish and Armenian archives. Gul advocated
the proposal on the international level," it said.

The center also expressed President Gul’s profound regret that the
issue was distorted for some political purposes although his views
were well-known. Gul was criticized by the opposition parties.

A group of people issued an apology on the internet for the events
of 1915 boosting a nationwide discussion.

Turkish Premier Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday that he did not
accept or support the campaign recently launched by a group of Turkish
intellectuals and academicians aiming to apologize to Armenians for
the incidents of 1915.

"They might have committed such a crime themselves, as they
are apologizing now. Republic of Turkey does not have such a
concern. One can apologize if there is a crime necessitating such
an apology. Neither my country, nor my nation has such concerns,"
Erdogan said, replying to questions following his meeting with
Bulgarian President Georgi Parvanov in Istanbul.

Erdogan said that it was unacceptable to support such a campaign just
because it was launched by intellectuals.

Armenia and Turkey do not have diplomatic relations and their shared
border has been closed since 1993 when Turkey protested Armenia’s
occupation of the Upper Karabakh.

Turkey accepts that many Armenians were killed during the waning
years of the Ottoman state, but strongly denies Armenian claims it
was genocide, saying that Armenians also killed Muslim Turks.

The apology describes the events as a great catastrophe.

President Abdullah Gul became the first Turkish leader to visit
Armenia in September as Turkey has sought to improve ties. Several
meetings between Turkish and Armenian officials have followed and
the two countries have expressed hopes of restoring full diplomatic
relations soon.

www.worldbulletin.net

PBS: It’s Back

IT’S BACK
By Michael Getler

PBS – Public Broadcasting
its_back.html
Dec 18 2008

What is broadly described as the "Armenian Genocide" — the epic
saga of what many, but not all, historians and many, but not all,
countries describe as the genocide against the Armenians carried
out by the Young Turks of the Ottoman Empire during World War I —
will never be forgotten. Nor should it be. Nor, it appears, will
PBS’s role in presenting this century-old controversy be forgotten.

More than two years ago, in April 2006, PBS aired a one-hour
documentary titled "The Armenian Genocide" by independent New York
filmmaker Andrew Goldberg and Oregon Public Broadcasting. It was, as I
wrote at the time, "a powerful and skillfully edited production" that
was no "on-the one-hand, on-the-other-hand account. This was a film
that sought to validate the genocide and nail down the issue with the
best evidence the producers could bring to the screen and into American
households." I actually wrote three columns about this program, the
last one, on April 21, 2006, includes links to the two earlier columns.

The reason for three columns is because the issue remains intensely
controversial among some — Turks, in particular, and a small
but committed collection of historians who dispute the mainstream
view and the appropriateness of the term genocide. The issue is so
controversial that PBS convened a televised panel of four scholars
on opposing sides charged with "Exploring the Issues" that appeared
immediately after the 2006 documentary was broadcast. Many stations,
however, including some big ones with lots of Armenians in the local
population, chose not to air the panel that included an American and
a Turkish participant who disagree with the genocide label.

As I said in that last column in April 2006, it seemed to me that
this was not what one would call a balanced issue and that there is
"a more substantial body of evidence and historical assessment on
the side of what happened to the Armenians." This was a sophisticated
documentary that made clear its assessment but also drew at least some
attention to the other side of the story so it did not, in my view,
violate PBS editorial guidelines. The panel that was tacked on could
have added more perspective from the Turkish side, but it was only
25 minutes and I thought it was poorly handled.

The point here is not to go over this unending controversy but
I bring it up, in shortened form, because late in November, PBS’s
Frontline World posted online a film called "Turkey: A Family Erased,"
a 12-minute documentary about an Armenian American family in search
of its ancestral Armenian home in what is now eastern Turkey. The
film is touching in ways that such films can be, and the young Turkish
children they find in the village are as warm and charming as any. But
the father makes clear at the outset that his ancestors were victims
of a series of massacres at the hands of the Turks in what he calls
the first genocide of the 20th century.

So, as was the case with the first documentary, members of the Turkish
American community and the Assembly of Turkish American Associations
have mounted another large e-mail campaign (much of it sent to me)
and a protest letter to PBS criticizing this as "little more than
a paid advertisement for a single view on a genuine and unfinished
historic debate."

I’m not going to go over all of this again but you can watch this short
film on the Frontline World Web site and you can also read well-stated
criticisms, and responses by Frontline World that include references
to my earlier columns, as well as a commentary by the filmmaker,
George Kachadorian.

There are some things about this new online film that bothered me,
but I don’t think it violated Frontline World’s editorial guidelines
for what it calls these "Rough Cut" films. Its guidelines state:
"Rough Cut videos will adhere to the same rigorous journalistic and
production standards as all FRONTLINE/World reports, but they may be
more idiosyncratic, more personal, more unconventional than our usual
television documentaries." This film is certainly more idiosyncratic
and personal than what one might expect.

The film is about the family of the filmmaker, an American of
Armenian descent. One of the things that I found bothersome about
the 2006 documentary for television was that the names of families
and foundations supporting and paying for that film seemed to be
overwhelmingly Armenian American. Another thing that was troublesome
about the 2006 TV production — more specifically about the panel
that was added on — was that congressmen in New York, California
and elsewhere where there are large numbers of Armenian Americans
lobbied hard, and with some success, to have the panel excluded
from the broadcast. The TV documentary, as I said earlier, was a
sophisticated production. This 12-minute film is not. It states its
case, through the family, unequivocally.

Frontline World answers that observation this way: "While we recognize
that some may dispute official estimates of the Armenian dead, and
that there remains plenty of room for scholarly inquiry into the deeply
complicated events of that time, we think Kachadorian’s piece, in its
unqualified assertion of genocide, is squarely within the current
scholarly consensus on the issue. We await future opportunities
to tell more stories — from all possible angles and viewpoints —
that help us reckon with this difficult history."

That’s a fair response. Nevertheless, this sort of home movie on
Frontline World surprised me and it struck me as odd that PBS, having
broadcast an earlier, careful and scholarly documentary, plus an
unusual follow-up panel — both of which attracted national attention,
controversy and thousands of e-mails on all sides — would come back
to this topic in this fashion.

http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/2008/12/

Roselli’s Book On The World’s First Pages (In Italian)

ROSELLI’S BOOK ON THE WORLD’S FIRST PAGES

Il Giornale

venerdì 12 dicembre 2008
Italia

Il libro di Rosselli sulle prime pagine di tutto il mondo

Da qualche giorno il telefono di Alberto Rosselli, autore del
libro "L’olocausto armeno" (Edizioni Solfanelli), non smette di
suonare. In seguito alla pubblicazione della recensione del suo
volume sulle pagine dell’edizione ligure del Giornale, i media
di mezza Europa hanno cominciato a cercarlo per saperne di più
sulle minacce di morte che ha ricevuto, e che continua a ricevere,
soltanto per aver raccontato come nei primi anni del Novecento un
milione e mezzo di cristiani armeni vennero massacrati dalle truppe
islamiche turco-curde. Uomini, donne, vecchi e bambini: l’intera
popolazione dell’Anatolia, colpevole soltanto di essere cristiana in
una terra circondata da una maggioranza musulmana, venne barbaramente
sterminata nei modi più efferati. Rosselli, che nel suo lavoro ha
descritto minuziosamente quanto accadde in quegli anni, dal 2007 è nel
mirino di presunti estremisti turchi che a qualunque ora del giorno
e della notte lo chiamano a casa, sul cellulare e ovunque si trovi,
minacciandolo di tagliare la gola a lui e a sua moglie. E la storia
ha cominciato a fare il giro del mondo.

"In questi giorni mi hanno chiamato la BBC di Londra, il quotidiano
francese Le Figarò, la redazione nazionale di Sky, la Radio Vaticana e
Il Foglio – dice Rosselli – Lunedì 8 dicembre, per esempio, l’Armenian
Television, un’emittente di Stato, ha trasmesso un servizio sul
mio caso, citando il vostro articolo. Tutto è cominciato dopo
quella pubblicazione. Per circa una settimana quasi silenzio. Sono
stato contattato soltanto da qualche amico e conoscente. Poi,
improvvisamente, la notizia è stata ripresa da numerosi siti
Internet, che hanno pubblicato per intero la recensione. È stata una
catena. Proprio di queste ore è la notizia che la Federazione Europea
degli Armeni, mercoledì 3 dicembre, ha presentato al Parlamento
Europeo di Bruxelles un rapporto nel quale, citando quanto avete
scritto voi, ha accostato il mio nome a quello del giornalista turco
Dogan Ozguden e del professor Ronald Monsch, anche loro minacciati da
estremisti turchi, per aver parlato pubblicamente del genocidio degli
armeni. So per certo che, fino ad oggi, l’articolo è stato tradotto
in inglese, turco e armeno. Ad esempio, c’è stata una pubblicazione
integrale sul quotidiano on line L’Italo-Europeo, un giornale di
cultura e approfondimento in italiano e inglese, diffuso in tutti i
Paesi europei. Ma è arrivato anche Oltreatlantico. In Canada è stato
pubblicato dal Corriere Italo-Canadese, mentre negli Stati Uniti è
apparso in inglese su un giornale armeno. Insomma, questa storia ha
avuto una diffusione che davvero non mi aspettavo".

Secondo Rosselli, a fare da cassa di risonanza all’articolo del
Giornale è stata soprattutto la Comunita Armena di Roma che, subito
dopo aver saputo della pubblicazione, ha diffuso immediatamente il
testo in tutti i suoi canali mediatici. Uno dei primi a riportare
l’articolo è stato il sito Zatik dell’Associazione Amicizia
Italo-Armena, subito seguito da Wikipedia, Thema Notizie, Storia
Libera, Rarika-Radice Blogspot e tanti altri ancora.

Senza contare le varie pubblicazioni, quotidiane e periodiche, che
in qualche modo hanno riportato la notizia un po’ ovunque, come ha
fatto appunto la britannica BBC.

"Forse – spiega Rosselli – è stato l’effetto Saviano che ha innescato
tutto questo interesse. Anche se, devo dire, il punto centrale è un
problema di politica internazionale, quale l’ingresso della Turchia
in Europa. L’Unione Europea ha posto ad Ankara, come condizione
imprescindibile per l’integrazione della Turchia, il riconoscimento del
genocidio da parte di Ankara. Riconoscimento che, detto per inciso, non
è ancora avvenuto. Non più tardi di martedì 2 dicembre, l’eurodeputata
olandese Ria Oomen-Ruijten, del Partito Popolare Europeo, ha presentato
la versione provvisoria del suo rapporto 2008 sulla Turchia alla
Commissione degli Affari Esteri del Parlamento Europeo. Ed è un
fatto oggettivamente significativo che questa presentazione sia
avvenuta tardivamente e davanti ad una sparuta platea di eurodeputati,
conosciuti per il loro appoggio incondizionato alla Turchia, oltre a
qualche giornalista dell’Anatolia. L’interesse, voglio dire, non è al
massimo livello. E il non voler riconoscere l’olocausto armeno, non
fa altro che peggiorare la posizione turca nei confronti dell’Europa".

A questo proposito, c’è poi la questione dei Diritti dell’Uomo e
della liberta d’espressione che, mentre sono considerati di primaria
importanza in Europa, non altrettanto si può dire che lo siano
in Turchia. Infatti, sempre secondo fonti della Ue, "la liberta
d’espressione e la liberta di stampa non sono sempre pienamente
protetti in Turchia", anche perche non sono pochi i giornalisti
che vengono perseguitati per le loro idee (come, appunto, Dogan
Ozguden). Inoltre, spesso, siti Internet scomodi vengono oscurati a
discrezione del governo turco.

Ed è proprio in questo contesto che si inserisce il caso dello
scrittore genovese Alberto Rosselli che, tra l’altro, continua
regolarmente a ricevere minacce di morte. "Le più fastidiose sono
quelle notturne – ammette – Verso le due o le tre, il telefono suona
e dall’altra parte qualcuno mi dice che mi ammazzera. Alcune volte,
poi, chi parla non conosce bene l’italiano, per cui si fa anche
fatica a comprendere le parole. Certo è che le voci sono sempre
diverse. Non so quanto sul serio io debba prendere questi episodi,
ormai così ricorrenti; però il dubbio che, tra tanti balordi, ci
possa essere anche qualche estremista particolarmente pericoloso,
c’è. E sono preoccupato soprattutto per mia moglie".

–Boundary_(ID_cQEng66rzpMIRavMHoDw nw)–

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.ilgiornale.it/a.pic1?ID=313869

Venice, Work Of Agostinelli Mark Commemorates The Armenian Genocide

VENICE, WORK OF AGOSTINELLI MARK COMMEMORATES THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

KataWeb
venerdì 12 dicembre 2008
Italia

Venezia, un’opera di Marco Agostinelli commemora il genocidio armeno

Una colonna di sette anfore in vetro di Murano ricordera il genocidio
armeno per mano dei turchi, avvenuto tra il 1915 e 1918.

L’opera, realizzata dall’artista romano in collaborazione con il
maestro vetraio Silvano Signoretto, sara esposta permanentemente nel
salone degli specchi dello splendido Palazzo Zenobio nel sestriere
di dorsoduro a Venezia. L’opera si ispira inoltre ad un verso di una
poesia del poeta armeno Daniel Varujan e l’anfora centrale è tutta
nera, dedicata alle vedove e donne armene. Il lavoro del maestro
Agostinelli è estremamente soggestivo e dialoga con gli specchi del
salone riproducendosi all’infinito.

–Boundary_(ID_HBp0pQR6ODBT2KHxoAx8 Nw)–

Kazakhstan May Impede Peace In The Region

KAZAKHSTAN MAY IMPEDE PEACE IN THE REGION

A1+
[07:19 pm] 18 December, 2008

The Ambassador to Kazakhstan in Armenia Aimdos Bozzhigitov presented
today the "Road to Europe" program, which Kazakhstan plans to implement
in 2009-2011. The Ambassador did not conceal the fact that the basis
for cooperation between Kazakhstan and other countries is economic
interest.

Kazakhstan’s "Road to Europe" program was presented in Armenia with
the initiative of the Council of Europe, which had commended the job
to the Yerevan school of political courses of the Council of Europe.

Among participants of the discussion were representatives of political
forces of the National Assembly, Foreign Affairs Ministry officials,
diplomats and NGO representatives. Accepting the fact that Kazakhstan
has turned into a key player in the region, participants of today’s
discussion took note that Kazakhstan must combine its economic
interest with other circumstances for maintaining peace and security
in the region.

"Today Kazakhstan plays a key role as a country that has an enormous
amount of power-generating resources. It is the second largest country
with petroleum, gas and uranium and the fifth largest wheat producing
country. Many European, American and Russian companies are drawing
their attention to Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is leading a versatile
foreign policy and all countries are tolerating that," said today NA
deputy Armen Ashotyan.

Aside from Kazakhstan’s advantages, Ashotyan talked about Kazakhstan’s
unilateral, crippled economic policy in the South Caucasus in presence
of the Ambassador and said:

"That underlines the difference in economic development between
Armenia and Azerbaijan. In other words, Kazakhstan contributes to
Azerbaijan’s increase in income, makes it become more bellicose
and thus, cripples the military balance in the region. Kazakhstan
may contribute to instability by losing to the militarization of a
country in the region."

Ashotyan believes that Kazakhstan must lay down the condition
that the profits or proceeds from investments must not be spent on
militarization.

As far as the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict settlement is concerned,
Kazakhstan has declared that it will hold a neutral stance in the case
of restart of military operations. Participants of today’s discussion
reminded the Ambassador that Kazakhstan is a member of the CSTO and
is obliged to support member countries in the case of a start of
military operations.

What is Kazakhstan planning on doing if military operations begin
on the Armenian-Azeri border? In response to that, the Ambassador
said: "Kazakhstan is in favor of the peaceful resolution of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict."

During today’s discussion, one of the participants stated that it
is harder to establish cooperation with Kazakhstan due to the lack
of a general border and that the August events in Georgia and Osetia
showed that the Georgian road is not too promising.

Diplomat David Hovhannisyan took note that in that case, Armenia can’t
cooperate with the U.S. and other European countries. He proposed to
the Kazakh Ambassador to cooperate with Armenia in the framework of
the Meiendorf declaration.

"It is a great opportunity to cooperate for peace and security in the
region, even in the framework of only one point," said Hovhannisyan.

Colorado State University Student Takes Key Role In International He

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY STUDENT TAKES KEY ROLE IN INTERNATIONAL HEALTH ISSUES IN ARMENIA
Dell Rae Moellenberg, [email protected]

US Fed News
December 16, 2008 Tuesday 6:11 AM EST

Colorado State University issued the following press release:

A veterinary student in Colorado State University’s College of
Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences is playing a key role in
international health and trade. The student, Litto Suu, is helping
to establish a national animal health program in Armenia along with
Dr. Mo Salman, professor in the college and expert in international
veterinary medicine affairs.

Salman and Suu, along with an Armenian and U.S. Department of
Agriculture team members, tested animals in two villages, Aragatsavan
and Nor Yer Znka, and then provided education to farmers there about
the diseases that were present in their animals.

"Our goal is to establish sound and scientifically based national
animal health program in Armenia that includes the food safety issues,"
Salman said. For the past 30 years, Salman has been traveling and
sharing his expertise in countries throughout the world.

"Many of the farmers didn’t know that so many of their animals
were infected with various diseases," Suu said. "By showing them the
prevalence of these diseases in their animals, especially brucellosis,
we were able to provide them with context to the importance of
preventative medicine in their herds."

The two diseases for which they tested in particular were
foot-and-mouth disease and brucellosis. Brucellosis is a zoonotic
disease, which means that humans can contract it from infected
animals or animal products. Brucellosis is a disease that can cause
spontaneous abortion in animals. Testing for brucellosis is especially
important because of Armenia’s cheese production industry. When spread
to humans, it causes remittent fever. If cheese is not pasteurized,
which it often is not in rural Armenian villages, the disease can be
passed from cheese to the humans who eat it.

The presence of foot-and-mouth disease in animals drastically limits
a country’s trade options.

Suu had the opportunity to run two town hall meetings and provide
the results, brochures about consumer awareness and the importance of
preventative medicine to the surrounding community. The opportunity
for a student to have this much involvement in an international
program is rare.

"She was the best ambassador for CSU in Armenia," Salman said. He saw
that she worked well with many types of people and had a determination
and a willingness to learn that made her successful in Armenia.

"Although we can provide information to the villagers, the government
must play a major role in controlling these diseases," Suu said.

Salman is the university’s point person for the cooperative agreement
between Colorado State and the U.S. Department of Agriculture for this
project in Armenia. Salman and the team of researchers also reached out
to the Armenian government with information on animal health issues.

Salman hopes that Armenia will be able to trade animal and animal
products nationally and internationally with less risk of spreading
animal diseases, including those that can be transmitted to humans.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the USDA monitor food
and drug safety, but Armenia does not have an equivalent to those
organizations.

Suu found this opportunity to study abroad and apply her skills when
she heard Salman speak. Suu, 23, is grateful for the opportunity to
work in Armenia.

"She approached me after she listened to my campus wide presentation
related to our international involvement," Salman said. "She was eager
to be involved in international activities to increase her knowledge
about veterinary medicine and its application in developing countries."

"Being able to work with the farmers and learn first-hand about
epidemiology from Dr. Salman’s team in a foreign country that
lacks strong disease control programs was a one-of-a-kind learning
opportunity for me," Suu said. "I enjoyed being able to work with
the local people and do work that related to my field."

Suu is originally from North East India in Nagaland. She has already
completed her undergraduate studies at Colorado State, and she decided
to attend Colorado State because of its renowned veterinary program.

BAKU: Turkish Public Angered By Campaign Of Apologizing To Armenians

TURKISH PUBLIC ANGERED BY CAMPAIGN OF APOLOGIZING TO ARMENIANS

Assa-Irada
Dec 16 2008
Azerbaijan

A group of scholars, journalists, men of art and NGO representatives of
Turkey have launched a signature campaign online aiming to apologize
to Armenians for the alleged Ottoman Empire-era genocide, sparking
a wave of public resentment. Local Huriyyet newspaper reported that
some 60 former ambassadors have issued a statement condemning the move
as erroneous and contradicting the countrys national interests. The
statement said that the re-settlement of Armenians carried out in 1915
in the conditions of war had caused bitter consequences. However,
the Turks losses, resulting from Armenian terror and riots, are no
less detrimental. It said that Armenians have historically sided with
the enemies and perpetrated atrocities in Anadolu, which is clearly
indicated in both local and foreign archives.