‘South-Caucasian Railway’ CJSC Suspends Repair Of Electric Locomotiv

‘SOUTH-CAUCASIAN RAILWAY’ CJSC SUSPENDS REPAIR OF ELECTRIC LOCOMOTIVES

ArmInfo
2008-12-23 14:42:00

‘The South-Caucasian Railway’, being a subsidiary of ‘RRW’ OJSC, has
suspended repair of electric locomotives, Minister for Transport
and Communication of Armenia Gurgen Sarkisyan said at today’s
press-conference.

"We shall still return to the issue of efficiency of using the
investments and the funds allotted to the company, as well as to their
structure and form. Not everything, that is invested, may be considered
investments", the minister said when commenting on the accusations,
published in the mass media, to SCRW on non-target use of funds. In
particular, the repair of the Armenian electric locomotive in Georgia
cost $1,8 mln to the "South-Caucasian Railway". G. Sarkisyan also said
the Ministry should receive the company’s financial report in early,
2009 and start its assessment. A special subdivision is created in
the Ministry to control the financial and investment activity of SCRW.

To recall, SCRW CJSC is the 100 percent subsidiary of Russian
Railways CJSC.

In February 2008 SCRW obtained a concession of the state CJSC Armenian
Railway. The agreement of concession of the Armenian Railroad CJSC
for 30 years with a 20-year renewable period was signed in Yerevan in
February 2008. The Russian Railways will invest $572 million in the
Armenian railway network, including $220 million within the coming
5 years.

Biometric Passports To Be Implemented In Armenia Started January 1,

BIOMETRIC PASSPORTS TO BE IMPLEMENTED IN ARMENIA STARTED JANUARY 1, 2010

ArmInfo
2008-12-23 14:38:00

Biometric passports and cards will be implemented in Armenia beginning
from January 1, 2010, Head of the Visa and Passport Department of the
Armenian Police Norayr Muradkhanyan said at today’s press-conference.

He also added biometric passports will be necessary for the citizens
of Armenia when leaving abroad, and identity cards will be used
inside the country. He also said that after implementation of a new
system, citizens of Armenia will have two documents confirming their
citizenship.

According to M. Muradkhanyan, beginning from 2010 persons having
reached the age of 16 will be given two documents at once, while the
earlier given passports will be replaced by the biometric documents
after expiration of their validity. He added that implementation of
the new system will essentially simplify the process of delivery of
identification documents.

Moreover, due to a more reliable control, this system will prevent
violations by the citizens when receiving social payments.

Head Of VTB (Armenia) Bank: 80% Of Business-Plan For 2008 Fulfilled

HEAD OF VTB (ARMENIA) BANK: 80% OF BUSINESS-PLAN FOR 2008 FULFILLED

ArmInfo
2008-12-23 18:00:00

VTB (Armenia) bank has managed to fulfill 80% of business-plan for
2008, endorsed by the shareholder of the bank – Russian VTB, Director
General, Chairman of Directorate of CJSC VTB (Armenia) Bank Valeriy
Ovsyannikov told ArmInfo.

He also added that over the current year the bank managed to reach
excellent results on all the parameters. ‘We managed to ensure
minimal dynamics of growth by 150% and achieve good volumes’, –
Ovsyannikov said and added that final results will be made public
only after finishing audit at the first decade of the first quarter
2009. Touching on the plans of the bank for 2009, he said the bank
will try to preserve the positions occupied at the market.’I think
that next year such a big dynamics of growth will not be fixed’, –
Ovsyannikov said and added that next year the bank is going to draw
special attention at the quality of the crediting portfolio and risks.

‘I am sure next year will not be so simple for the corporative clients
of the bank as well as private borrowers. Stemming from this we are
already conducting the policy of limitation of the number of borrowers,
selecting the best ones’, – he said.

According to the Ranking of commercial bank prepared by ArmInfo,
as of 1 October 2008, total capital of VTB (Armenia) Bank amounted
to 23.2 bln AMD or $76.7 mln (the second position), assets – 98 bln
AMD or $324.4 mln (the 4th position), crediting portfolio – 74.7 bln
AMD or $247.1 mln (the second position). According to the results
of 9 months profit of the bank amounted to 2.4 bln AMD or $8 mln
(the 4th position).

Passport Issue In Armenia Simplified For Minors

PASSPORT ISSUE IN ARMENIA SIMPLIFIED FOR MINORS

ArmInfo
2008-12-23 18:05:00

Passport issue in Armenia has considerably been simplified for
minors, Head of Visa and Passports Division of Armenian Police Norayr
Muradkhanyan said at today’s press- conference. He also added that the
Armenian Government has introduced amendments into the order of issuing
passports to minors, according to which minors may receive passports
upon application of one of their parents or an authorized person.

Muradkhanyan said that the process of issuing passports has been
simplified for Armenian citizens living abroad as well. Henceforth,
this issue may be tackled in Armenian embassies and consulates to
which the minors and their parents may apply. The amendments to the
passport issue order is connected with the general reformation of the
passport system. According to Muradkhanyan, thanks to the amendments,
persons under arrest may also receive or change their passports.

Muradkhanyan also added that in 2008 a total of 1309 citizens
were admitted to citizenship in Armenia, 310 citizens renounced
citizenship. According to him, the total number of persons having
applied for Armenian citizenship since 2001 is 4077.

Americans In The Gulag

AMERICANS IN THE GULAG

The Times Literary Supplement
December 23, 2008

The little-known story of US citizens trying to escape the Depression
Adam Hochschild Mountainous Kolyma, only a few hundred miles west
of the Bering Strait, is the coldest inhabited area on earth. During
Stalin’s rule, some 2 million prisoners were sent there to mine the
rich deposits of gold that lie beneath the rocky, frozen soil. In 1991,
when researching a book about how Russians were coming to terms with
the Stalin era, I travelled to the region to see some of the old
camps of Kolyma, legendary as the most deadly part of the gulag,
some of whose survivors I had interviewed. In a country beset by
shortages of building materials, all of the hundreds of former prison
camps accessible by truck had long since been stripped bare. The only
ones still standing were those no longer reached by usable roads,
and to see them you had to rent a helicopter.

I spent a full day being flown across this desolate territory, its
gravelly mountainsides streaked with snow even in June. We descended
into three of the old camps, finding rickety wooden guard towers, high
fences of rusted barbed wire, and, in one camp, an internal prison of
punishment cells. Its roof was gone, but thick stone walls still stood;
within them were small windows crossed both vertically and horizontally
by heavy bars, the intersections further cinched with thick iron
bands. At the end of the day in Kolyma, as shadows filled the hollows
like spreading ink,we flew back to the town where I was staying. I sat
in the helicopter cockpit between the two pilots. Beyond every jagged
ridge, it seemed, in every valley, were the ruins of another camp,
the wood blackened by decades of exposure, as if an angry giant’s
hand had scattered them across the harsh, bleak moonscape.

No one knows exactly how many Soviet citizens met unnatural deaths
during the quarter-century that Stalin wielded absolute power, but
adding together those who were sentenced to death and shot, died in
manmade famines, or were worked to death in gulag camps like these,
authoritative estimates put the total at approximately 20 million. Like
the other great horror show unfolding in German-occupied Europe in
the same period, the Soviet story was one of mass deaths on an almost
unimaginable scale. But, unlike the Nazis, the Soviets, in their first
two decades in power, were partly sustained by great idealism on the
part of people all over the world who were fervently hoping for a more
just society. The Forsaken by Tim Tzouliadis is a poignant reminder
of this. For his account of the Stalin years and their aftermath is
seen through an unusual prism: the experience of tens of thousands
of Americans who emigrated to the Soviet Union in the 1930s. Many
of them, like the Russians they lived among, fell vi ctim. Bits and
pieces of this story have been told before, mainly in survivors’
memoirs. But to my knowledge this is the first comprehensive history,
and a sad and fascinating one it is.

Like the thousands of Western Europeans who arrived in the same period,
these immigrants were driven by the Great Depression at home and the
belief that a better, fairer way of life existed in the USSR. A quarter
of the US labour force was unemployed, and millions of Americans
were standing in line at soup kitchens or living in "Hooverville"
shantytowns when they had lost their homes or farms. Was it not
possible to construct a more humane society than this? Of course it
was – and in Russia, apparently, they were doing it. Factories were
hiring – particularly skilled workers and engineers, who were being
offered what seemed to be lucrative contracts.

And these factories were said to have nursery schools, clinics,
libraries.

Although many of the American immigrants had been socialists or
Communists in the US, you didn’t have to be one to believe that
somewhere in the world someone had been able to build a more sensible
economy than the Depression-ridden American one. One of many intriguing
facts Tzouliadis has unearthed is that an English translation of
something originally written for Soviet schoolchildren, New Russia’s
Primer: The story of the Five-Year Plan, spent seven months on the
US 0bestseller list in 1931.

When the Soviet foreign trade agency advertised jobs for skilled
American workers in Russia that year, 100,000 Americans applied. 10,000
Ten thousand of them were hired; untold thousands more headed for the
country on tourist visas, hoping to find work when they got there. By
early 1932, the New York Times was reporting that up to 1,000a
thousand new Americans were arriving in Moscow each week – and that
the number was increasing. The Times correspondent,, Walter Duranty,
was a notorious fellow traveller and may have exaggerated; nonetheless,
that year the number climbed high enough for the English-language
weekly Moscow News to go daily. The Immigrants brought their children,
and soon there were English-medium schools in at least five Soviet
cities. For $40 million, Stalin bought 75,000 Model A sedans from
Henry Ford, plus an entire Ford factory – which, of course, required
expert technicians to run it, and so more Americans came.

With them, the newcomers brought baseball. Tzouliadis includes a
group photograph of smiling young American players at Gorky Park in
the summer of 1934, with the initials on their jerseys identifying
their teams: the Moscow Foreign Workers’ Club and the Gorky Auto
Workers’ Club. Paul Robeson, who had been a star college athlete
before becoming a Communist and a famous singer, was named honorary
catcher of one of the teams. Other American baseball teams sprang up
everywhere from Kharkov in the Ukraine to Yerevan, Armenia. (A map
in this book would have helped, incidentally.) The motif of baseball
threads through The Forsaken, and some of its pages trace what happened
to the men who played that day in Gorky Park.

Baseball caught on with Russians, and they began joining the
American teams, or starting their own, although they considered
the practice of stealing bases somewhat capitalistic. Then suddenly
it was 1936, and the Great Purge had begun. Having already jailed,
shot or exiled all his real political opponents, a paranoid Stalin
now went after imaginary ones, in the process tapping a deep vein of
Russian xenophobia. Waves of mass arrests swept across the country,
with an estimated one out of every eight Soviet men, women and children
being seized in the space of half a dozen years. At the show trials of
high Communist Party officials, the charge was usually espionage for a
foreign power. And so foreigners, or anyone connected with foreigners,
were suspect. No more Russians joined the American baseball games. Very
soon, there was no more baseball.

>From Alexander Solzhenitsyn and other Russians who have borne witness,
we know about the midnight arrests, the interrogations and forced
confessions, the trains hauling packed boxcars of emaciated prisoners
to the labour camps scattered across the Arctic, Siberia, Kazakhstan
and elsewhere. Tzouliadis traces the story20of the Americans who
got caught up in this madness through a wide range of letters and
documents, and the published memoirs of two men who played on American
baseball teams in Moscow in the mid-1930s, Victor Herman and Thomas
Sgovio. Unlike many of their fellow players, whom they occasionally
encountered in the gulag, they survived their imprisonment: Herman
in central Russia and Sgovio in Kolyma. No one knows how many of the
American immigrants were caught up by the Purge and perished either
in execution cellars or in the camps, although one mass grave with
more than 140 American bodies was found in 1997 near the Finnish
border. Tzouliadis does not try to estimate the total American
dead. My own guess would be that the figure is in the thousands;
if we add victims among Britons and other Westerners living in USSR
at the time, the total would be in the tens of thousands.

The testimony of Herman and Sgovio has found its way into some
histories of the gulag. But Tzouliadis’s most unexpected contribution
is the sorry tale of how desperate pleas for help from captive
Americans, some smuggled out of prison, some made by family members
still at liberty who risked their lives by walking into the closely
watched US Eembassy, were ignored by diplomats in Moscow and officials
back in Washington. Tzouliadis has burrowed through hundreds of old
State Department correspondence files for this evidence, finding
even a wooden tag smuggled out of a camp with the words, in English,
"Save me please and all the others". Even though the conservative
Ambassador of tiny Austria was able to save the lives of more than
twenty Austrian left-wingers by sheltering them in his basement, US
officials, contemptuous of the Americans who had come to Russia out
of naive idealism, did virtually nothing. Yet they could have saved
many lives if they had tried, for Stalin was shrewd enough to want to
please a valued foreign trading partner. Again and again, the diplomats
turned aside those begging for help, generally with the excuse that
there was no proof that the prisoner involved was a US citizen. This
was literally often true, for when Americans arrived to work in the
Soviet Union, the Russians usually confiscated their passports – the
better to exert control, and also to acquire a stash of US passports
they could later doctor and use to send Soviet spies abroad.

Why were the officials so callous? For one thing, making too much
noise might get you expelled from what was, for a rising young Foreign
Service officer, a plum post. Beyond that, diplomats temperamentally
are seldom troublemakers; the exceptions, like Raoul Wallenberg
or Henry Morgenthau Sr, the US envoy to Turkey who did so much
to publicize the Armenian genocide, are rare. And finally, behind
those who played it safe at the US Embassy in Moscow in the lates
was another factor: their boss.

In the American practice of handing out ambassadorships to presidential
chums and campaign contributors, never was there a more ill-fated
choice than Franklin D. Roosevelt’s selection of Joseph E. Davies as
US Ambassador to Moscow in 1936. Davies knew nothing about Russia; he
had made a small fortune as a lawyer, defending corporations against
government tax collectors during the boom times of the 1920s. He had
then married the owner of a much larger fortune, the cereal heiress
Marjorie Merriweather Post, known for her array of extravagant homes,
one of which was the world’s largest private yacht, the three-masted
Sea Cloud, with a crew of sixty-two.

Davies "loved bigness", Justice Louis Brandeis once said, criticizing
him for his failures on a government commission that was supposed
to curb monopolies. In Stalin’s Russia, Davies found bigness that
satisfied him completely. To the horror of other diplomats, he attended
several of the Purge show trials and told the State Department that
justice had been done. It did not seem to bother him when Soviet
acquaintances vanished. One Russian diplomatic liaison officer had
taken Davies’s daughter and some friends out for dinner and dancing
when two men came to their table and tapped him on the shoulder. "He
was never seen again", Tzouliadis writes. Nor was Mrs Davies much
disturbed by any of this, even though, she said years later, from
their bedroom at the US Ambassador’s residence, she could sometimes
hear women and children screaming in adjacent apartment buildings as
men were arrested in the middle of the night. Her main interest was
in collecting art, jewellery and china that had once belonged to the
Russian aristocracy, something she was able to do on a lavish scale
as the government raised hard currency by selling off confiscated
collections.

In 1937, the peak year of Purge arrests, Davies managed to spend most
days of the year outside Russia, some of it cruising the Baltic on the
Sea Cloud, with his astonished Soviet secret police guards along as
his invited guests. At the end of his stay in Moscow, he was overjoyed
that Stalin granted him a two-hour audience, after the dictator had
refused to meet other Western ambassadors. "He is really a fine,
upstanding, great man!", Davies told an underling at the Eembassy. Of
all the foreign deniers and abettors who helped Stalin get away with
mass murder, this staunchly capitalist couple were certainly among
the strangest.

There is a later chapter to Tzouliadis’s story, for a second wave
of Americans entered Soviet prison camps – at least 2,800 of them,
according to one Russian document he cites – at the end of the Second
World War, as the Red Army overran POW camps in Germany, and a third,
sm aller wave as the Chinese turned over POWs captured in Korea. The
Russians refused to give back these men or even to acknowledge their
existence. With the Cold War now under way, the leverage that the US
had once had over the Soviet Union was lost, and more Americans met
their end amid snow and ice.

Tzouliadis apparently does not know Russian, but aside from a few odd
transliterations and an infelicity in his subtitle (the acronym gulag
refers to the entire network, not to an individual camp), this has not
limited his research. Soviet officials who dealt with Americans during
the 1930s are by now all dead, many of them Purge victims themselves;
and Russian archives, once briefly accessible in the early 1990s, are
again now mostly closed to foreign researchers. This is an American
as well as a Soviet story, and in telling it skilfully from a wide
variety of rarely used and mostly American sources, Tzouliadis has
etched a small piece of a great historical cataclysm and reminded
us of how Stalin’s regime devoured not just human lives but hopes,
dreams, trust. Those American baseball players who came to Russia
found themselves in a tragic game with no umpire – either in the
Kremlin or the US Eembassy. This book makes me wonder whether the
several mass-grave sites I saw in Russia – one full of earth-stained,
bullet-riddled skulls in central Siberia, and one of bones bleached
white under an electrical transmission tower on a foggy, wind-swept
hillside in Kolyma – might have contained any of my countrymen who
were once catchers, pitchers, or first basemen.

Defendant On "Case Of Seven," NA Deputy Hakob Hakobian Moved From Ho

DEFENDANT ON "CASE OF SEVEN," NA DEPUTY HAKOB HAKOBIAN MOVED FROM HOSPITAL TO KENTRON PENITENTIARY INSTITUTION

NOYAN TAPAN

Dec 23, 2008
Yerevan

Defendant on the "case of the seven," NA deputy Hakob Hakobian was
moved from convicts’ hospital, where he stayed due to health problems,
to Yerevan’s Kentron penitentiary institution. According to Melania
Arustamian, H. Hakobian’s lawyer, it is not known, on the basis
of which the decision to move him to the penitentiary institution
was made.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1010875

Trial On "Case Of Seven" Postponed With Motivation Of Defendants’ Tr

TRIAL ON "CASE OF SEVEN" POSTPONED WITH MOTIVATION OF DEFENDANTS’ TREATING COURT WITH DISREGARD

NOYAN TAPAN

Dec 23, 2008
YEREVAN

The trial on the "case of the seven" that was to continue on December
23 at Yerevan Shengavit community court was again postponed without
being resumed.

Judge Mnatsakan Martirosian presiding over at the sitting explained
the fact that the court sitting started 40 minutes late saying that
one of the defendants, Grigor Voskerchian had health problems. As
G. Voskerchian’s lawyer Stepan Voskanian told journalists afterwards,
the defendant had been beaten in the prison cell. According to
the lawyer, in the morning the same day 4 employees of the special
detachment of the criminal punishments execution department entered the
prison cell of Nubarashen penitentiary institution where G. Voskerchian
is kept. All prisoners except G. Voskerchian were brought out on the
pretext of examining the cell. The special detachment head learning
from the latter that he is accused on the "case of the seven" beat
him hitting him for several times in the face and ear. The defendant
suffering from beating demanded undergoing medical examination.

Before the court sitting started the defendants tried to make a
statement on the incident, but the judge, who had publicized provisions
of the law on manners during the court sitting before, announced thirty
minutes’ break for defendants’ shouting from their seats and hindering
the trial. However the sitting did not take place in thirty minutes,
either. For not meeting the court standing up and therefore treating
it with disregard judge M. Martirosian sent the defendants away from
the hall postponing the court sitting until December 27. He said that
these 4 days will not be included in the defendants’ imprisonment term,
and that decision is not subject to appeal.

Before the sitting the most part of defendants’ relatives were
sent away from the court hall with the motivation of lack of vacant
seats. The men taking those seats in advance behaved aggressively
and refused to introduce themselves saying that they are the
aggrieved, while special seats were intended for the aggrieved at
the court. Journalists being at the court recognized employees of
Kentron Police station among those "aggrieved."

Mass media representatives were also sent away from the hall. A room
had been intended for them on the second floor with the motivation
of creating more favorable conditions for their work, where they had
a possibility to follow the trial on TV. The journalists were also
prohibited to even conduct interviews outside the hall.

After the sitting break the defendants’ lawyers stated that the
incidents in the court hall are a regular provocation organized by the
authorities, the executor of which was judge M. Martirosian. According
to lawyer Hovik Arsenian, the authorities have ordered him to drag
out the start of the trial as far as possible, as all accusations
on the "case of the seven" will be refuted. Besides, by postponing
the sitting the judge did not permit to make a statement on violence
against G. Voskerchian. According to the latter’s lawyer, a crime
has been committed, about which the RA Prosecutor General will be
informed the same day.

http://www.nt.am?shownews=1010870

Issues Of Development Of Armenian-Indian Trade Economic Relations Di

ISSUES OF DEVELOPMENT OF ARMENIAN-INDIAN TRADE ECONOMIC RELATIONS DISCUSSED

ARMENPRESS
Dec 22, 2008

YEREVAN, DECEMBER 22, ARMENPRESS: For taking part in the
Armenian-Indian first business forum and discussing issues connected
with the development of trade-economic relations between the two
countries, on the invitation of the Indian Chamber of Commerce
and Industry the Armenian delegation headed by the deputy Armenian
Agriculture Minister Samvel Avetisian was in Delhi recently.

An official from the Ministry’s department of foreign relations told
Armenpress that during the forum the participants exchanged thoughts
over the directions of development of Armenian-Indian trade-industrial
relations, the peculiarities of investment fields of the two countries,
overcoming of existing barriers, cooperation in the agrarian sphere,
light industry as well as on the collaborative activity in the
IT sphere.

S. Avetisian’s report on "The export of Armenian agrarian sphere
and the preferable directions of foreign investments" in the Indian
Chamber of Commerce and Industry gave rise to a number of practical
requests and comments. Particularly the Indian side was interested
in the risks of investments in the sphere of reprocessing of Armenian
agricultural goods and the opportunities of buying of agro technology.

Within the frameworks of the visit the Armenian delegation visited the
"Ecsports limited" tractor factory, which produces 350,000 tractors
annually and provides them to 45 countries, and got acquainted with
the technology of their production and the variety of the products.

Negotiations have also been conducted with the head of "Brief Company
Profile" company on purchasing fertilizers. It has been decided to
send an invitation for the tender of state purchases of tractors to
the "Ecsports limited" company and after getting the price lists of
fertilizers and tractors to provide them to individual importers.

Accompanied with Armenian ambassador in India A. Kocharian, Indian
ambassador in Armenia R. Pandey and deputy Armenian Economy Minister
M. Tovmasian, S. Avetisian visited the Indian Foreign Ministry,
was in the textile industry and other branches of economy.

During the all above mentioned meetings agreements confirming the
cooperation of the two countries, have been reached.

ANKARA: ‘Cyprus Issue Must Be Solved To Get Results In EU-Turkey Neg

‘CYPRUS ISSUE MUST BE SOLVED TO GET RESULTS IN EU-TURKEY NEGOTIATIONS’

Today’s Zaman
Dec 22 2008
Turkey

Dorothee Schmid, head of the Turkish studies program at Institut
francais des relations internationales (Ifri), has said the
European Commission is concerned that the Cyprus issue may block the
bureaucratic pace of the accession negotiations with Turkey.

"They want to have it solved one way or another but will offer no
solution themselves," she said, adding that the European Union’s
main mistake was not to solve the problem before admitting Cyprus
into the EU in 2004 as a representative of the entire island even
though the island has been divided into a Greek Cypriot south and
a Turkish Cypriot north. Additionally, the Greek Cypriots rejected
the UN-mediated Annan plan to reunify the island just prior to
EU accession. Turkish Cypriots supported the same Annan plan in
a simultaneous referendum, but the EU has not delivered what it
promised, which was to reduce the isolation of the Turkish Cypriots
and, as a result, Turkey has refused to open its air and sea ports
to Greek Cypriot traffic.

The EU suspended accession negotiations on eight chapters in 2006
because of Turkey’s stance and agreed to review the situation in
2009. France alone has refused to open talks on five chapters that
it says are directly related to accession.

The issue was discussed extensively at a conference titled "Turkey
and Europe after the French Presidency of the EU" and organized by
Ifri and the Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV)
in Paris. Schmid elaborates on the subject for Monday Talk.

How would you evaluate French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s EU term
presidency in relation to European Union-Turkey and France-Turkey
relations?

At the bilateral level, the relationship has improved. At the EU level,
France stated from the beginning that it would proceed normally and
that it had no interest in antagonizing the Turks.

Please elaborate on how bilateral relations have improved and why
you think France chose not to irritate Turkey?

At the Franco-Turkish level, there have been a number of meetings and
contacts between the two sides. [Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip]
Erdogan and Sarkozy met several times. The foreign affairs ministries
of both sides have held regular consultations and worked on a number
of projects together in the Middle East and the Caucasus. Two French
ministers also visited Turkey in the last two months. In fact, despite
a strained bilateral political climate between the two countries,
there were significantly more French ministerial visits to Turkey
in 2008 than in the previous year. It was clear from the outset that
France could not afford to antagonize the Turks during its presidency
of the EU because it had to cope with a number of hard European
issues and it was necessary to prioritize them over a short period of
time. In this rather tense context, battling over the Turkish accession
process lost any sense of urgency. Then during the presidency itself,
there were two major crises to deal with at the EU level; one was the
Russian-Georgian crisis and the other is the financial crisis. In the
long run, the French administration’s strategy is determined by the
evolution of the public’s mood both in Turkey and in the EU. Currently,
the public is not in favor of accession on both sides. So there is
no emergency when it comes to dealing with that issue.

What is the next strategy going to be?

We are dealing with the financial crisis now, following which
we have to solve the institutional problem on the EU side. And
then, maybe, comes dealing with the political issue of Turkish
accession. Bureaucratically, negotiations are going on and the opening
of [negotiation] chapters proceeds more or less at the same pace every
year. The European Commission started to stress getting out of the
Cyprus deadlock as soon as possible so that the pace of opening two
chapters a year can continue. Also, the EU’s progress report on Turkey
was quite moderate. We are in a better situation than last year. We
can see that by comparing this year’s and last year’s conference at
Ifri on Franco-Turkish relations and its EU extensions. Last year’s
meeting was more of a diplomatic exercise than this year’s outspoken
tone. Apparently, the level of mutual trust has improved. People were
more personal, maybe even more worried and more critical, but they
could do it because it is easier to talk to each other.

But as the anti-Turkey camp in the EU continues to block the opening
of chapters over the Cyprus issue, how can it be possible to continue
with negotiations at the same pace?

We have to rely on the diplomatic efforts of both sides of the island
in the Cyprus issue. The commission is concerned that the Cyprus issue
is going to block the bureaucratic pace of the negotiations. They
want to have it solved one way or another, but they will offer no
solution themselves.

There has been talk of suspending the negotiations…

Partial suspension already occurred for eight chapters in 2006
precisely because of the Cyprus issue. Apparently, suspension was again
mentioned informally after the opening of a closure case against the
Justice and Development Party (AK Party). EU Enlargement Commissioner
Olli Rehn issued an awkward statement when he said the closure case
could hurt democracy in Turkey and that if things evolve in a negative
way, the EU could consider suspension. Later, the commission realized
that they were going much too far and that this kind of a statement
falls on EU member states to make and not on the commission. Although
the member states were cautious on this issue, they never took sides.

As you said, the EU blocked eight chapters because of the Cyprus
issue. Turks do not think that it is fair to tie the issue to Turkey’s
membership and insert obstacles.

Cyprus is a problem in the background of the EU-Turkish relationship
that has to be solved anyway if we want negotiations to get anywhere
in the end. We know the main mistake was not solving the problem
before admitting Cyprus into the EU. Now the Turks tend to consider
the Cyprus case as a political variable in a process of bargaining
with the EU while the commission is stuck in a legal approach and
some member states envisage it as a test of the normalization of the
Turkish political system.

France alone blocked five chapters that have no direct link to
Cyprus. Why?

The official position of France is that we want to discuss chapters
that are at the core of the accession process not now but later,
at the end of the schedule. Turkey holds the opposite view.

Turks perceive the French position as harboring ill will against
Turkey.

During his presidential campaign Sarkozy openly spoke against Turkey’s
accession into the EU. Once in office he has realized that blocking
things needs unanimity and that France cannot act on this alone. One
could say that the French are now resorting to a variety of legal
tricks to maintain control of the accession process.

What would happen if France went ahead and removed its blockage of
those five chapters? Wouldn’t it be a way of showing good will toward
Turkey — especially during its presidency term?

Just opening chapters is the wrong way of envisaging the whole bulk
of bureaucratic work. The next concern of the commission is that
the pace of reform really stalled in Turkey. Turkish officials at
the conference said the EU blocks Turkey’s way but this view is an
exaggeration. Turkey has been extremely slow in the last couple of
years when it comes to reforms. And reforming is a long and heavy
process. That is why the EU said negotiations would last at least 10
to 15 years.

‘Davutoglu shares with Sarkozy a common understanding of international
relations’

Chief advisor to the Prime Minister of Turkey Ahmet Davutoglu said at
the Ifri/TESEV conference that Turkey is the only candidate country
with the same leverage that France, Britain, Germany and Spain have
in the Middle East, the Balkans, the Caucasus and in Europe. What is
your view of this?

What struck me while listening to Davutoglu is that he apparently
shares with Sarkozy a common understanding of international
relations. The rehabilitation of geopolitics and reasoning in
terms of spheres of influence is very much in fashion in France at
the moment. The "three-leg" approach — bilateral, EU and regional
level — can certainly account for the way the Elysee envisages its
relationship with Turkey.

Do you think Sarkozy can envision acting together with Turkey in
areas where Turkey has been active diplomatically, such as in the
Middle East and in the Caucasus?

In fact, Turkey and France share some interests in the Middle East and
the Caucasus and can certainly work out ways together to deal with
crises in the region. It was important that Erdogan and Sarkozy met
before the Mediterranean summit in July because it showed that Sarkozy
officially recognized Turkey’s added value — at the time specifically
on Middle Eastern and Mediterranean political matters. Other topics of
interest for the French could be energy and advancing French business
presence in Turkey. At the same time, constantly reminding the French
public that Turkey’s neighborhood is so instable and riddled with
crises may not be the best argument to ameliorate its image as an
EU candidate.

Do you think France and Turkey sometimes react in similar ways and
that this is why the two sides clash easily, as Davutoglu suggested?

They probably share some basic psychological features when it comes to
framing a vision and behavior in international arenas. Yet we should
not forget that they are not in an equal position when it comes to
talking about the EU: France is inside, and thus in a position of
force. When the Turks suggest retaliating against the French or speak
of using their veto power in a multilateral framework such as NATO,
I don’t think Sarkozy likes it, but I don’t think he pays serious
attention to it either. Davutoglu’s final suggestion that Turkey
does not really need the EU is more interesting because it implicitly
modifies the balance of power between the two partners.

How has the campaign of some Turkish intellectuals to apologize for
the events of 1915, which Armenians claim constitute "genocide,"
been perceived here?

It has been received very positively by the Armenian diaspora and
the public at large in France. Any evidence that civil society in
Turkey is not monolithic and that it is mature enough to engage in
difficult debates is welcomed.

‘There is no common EU diplomacy’

"Most member states are worried about political instability in
Turkey. Turkey’s political instability has influenced the country’s
image in the eyes of the Europeans. The balance sheet of 2008 shows
that Turkey went through a serious political crisis. We don’t know the
balance of power between the actors. There is a political compromise
now but it has not stabilized institutionally so we don’t know how
it will evolve. However, we had a series of diplomatic crises in the
region and the Turks clearly demonstrated their good will. They were
a key element in helping monitor crises in their neighborhood. So
in some way it makes up for the first part of the picture, but not
completely because, at the end of the day, joining the EU first means
working internally as a member state of the EU, being a ‘reliable’
state internally. So selling the EU-Turkey relationship as a win-win
game as far as diplomacy is concerned is quite tricky because we don’t
have a common EU diplomacy at this stage. Turkey can be a very good
contributor in that respect even if it stays out of the EU."

Year of Turkey in France starts in July 2009

"This is an important event which might impact very positively the
image of Turkey in France. It is an official bilateral event organized
by the French and Turkish foreign ministries. The selection of projects
is extremely important and civil society’s involvement is crucial. The
scope of events programmed will go beyond culture; in addition to
exhibitions, concerts and dances, business encounters and academic
debates will also take place. Turkey will be the honorary guest of
the Paris Film Festival. It will start in July 2009 and end in March.

Dorothee Schmid

Head of the Turkish studies program at the Institut francais des
relations internationales (Ifri), she holds a doctorate in political
science from University Paris-II. As an expert on European foreign
policies, especially vis-a-vis the Mediterranean region and the Middle
East, she has worked for the risk analysis department of the bank
Credit Agricole Indosuez and as an adviser for a French federation of
local authorities, Cites Unies France. Her research interests presently
deal mainly with political economy and the democratization issue as
well as conflict management in the Middle East and the Caucasus. She
teaches European policies and Middle Eastern issues at the Ecole
speciale militaire de Saint-Cyr, the Ecole nationale d’administration
(ENA) and at the Institut des relations internationales et strategiques
(IRIS).

ANKARA: Churches Cause Santa Claus To Work Overtime

CHURCHES CAUSE SANTA CLAUS TO WORK OVERTIME

Hurriyet
Dec 22 2008
Turkey

ISTANBUL – The Christian world celebrates Christmas on different
dates. The cloaks, calpacs and armbands worn by clerics differ because
of doctrine and culture. They also are traces of thousands of years
of mysticism

In the world of Christianity, the cloaks, calpacs, armbands and belts
worn by priests contain traces of thousands of years of mysticism.

The Catholic Church, made an indelible impression in the middle ages
with glorious adornments, followed by a simpler style over time. Long,
white gabardines and black cloaks replaced baroque style dressing. As
the Catholic world became plainer, the Orthodox churches of Christians
living in Anatolia, the Caucasians and the Balkans drew attention with
the alacrity and dynamism of their colours and their adornments. On
Christmas Eve, the Hurriyet Daily News & Economic Review spoke with
Zakeos Ohanian, a theology expert, graduate of the Vatican Urbanian
University and an Orthodox priest, on church garments and why Christmas
was celebrated on different dates in the Christian world by different
doctrines.

Ohanian, chancellor of the Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople in
Kumkapı and a religious functionary from the Surp Asdvazsazsin (Holy
Virgin Mary) church, said, "As is known in history, the churches in
the Christian world divided over disagreements and different doctrines
appeared. The differences in the doctrines was the basis for Christmas
to be celebrated at different times."

Solar Holiday became Christmas Ohanian said that unlike the rest of
the world, Armenian, Syrian, Coptic (Egypt) and Abyssinian (Hindu)
churches celebrated Christmas not on Dec. 24, but on Jan. 6. Another
reason for Christmas being celebrated on different dates goes back
to the second century. "Apostles of Jesus, Saint Peter and Saint
Paul, travelled through Athens and Rome to Portugal and from there
to inner and northern parts of Europe to spread Christianity," said
Ohanian. "Northern Scandinavian countries worshipped the sun before
Christianity and the holiday was celebrated on Dec. 24. With the
acceptance of Christianity, Christmas replaced this holiday. Therefore,
Christmas happened to be celebrated on Dec. 24 in Europe."

The prototype for the cloaks is from the Torah and the Psalms As to
religious garments worn by Christian churches, Ohanyan said despite
differences in doctrine and culture, there was a common tradition
in the garments of clerics. "Starting with preachers and cassocks,
from priests and priestess with the vow of celibacy, to bishops,
all garments were long and loose. The appearance of the garments was
not considered, the purpose was to hide body shape." Ohanian said
the cloaks and calpacs’ prototypes had come from the Torah and the
Psalms. "If we put cultural reflections to the side, the truth is,
all garments worn by clerics of the churches of the world are one to
one with Jewish culture."

Cloaks processed with golden fibres

Ohanian’s area of expertise is the Armenian Church, part of the
Eastern Orthodox Church of which he is a member. Omanyan said until
the 1900s there was over 2,000 Armenian churches and more than 150
monasteries in Anatolia. "Garments of the Anatolian clerics differed
greatly according to the area they were from. The craftsmen used
to process every garment with golden fibres manually. The results
were garments that were lifelike and flamboyant." Ohanian added,
"Unfortunately, we had nothing left from the legacy of Anatolia which
we can use an example."

–Boundary_(ID_mTE4/fxKAaMfwo01Aba 8ZQ)–